DOCSLIB.ORG

Moldova - Key Challenges and Political Developments Burkhardt, Fabian

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Moldova - Key Challenges and Political Developments Burkhardt, Fabian www.ssoar.info Moldova - Key Challenges and Political Developments Burkhardt, Fabian Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Zeitschriftenartikel / journal article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Burkhardt, F. (2020). Moldova - Key Challenges and Political Developments. Südosteuropa Mitteilungen, 60(01-02), 147-159. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-70278-4 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Südosteuropa Mitteilungen | 01 – 02 | 2020 Berichte 147 Concluding with optimism, Adelheid Wölfl and closed the discussion. Hansjörg Brey thanked the panellists and International Workshop at the European Academy in Berlin Moldova – Key Challenges and Political Developments Organizers: Southeast Europe Association (SOG), funded by the German Federal Foreign Office via the Stability Pact for South Eastern Europe Berlin, 13 / 14 December 2019 Report by Fabian Burkhardt, Berlin Introduction agreement for cooperation, electing Maia Sandu This report gives an overview of discussion in as new Prime Minister of the Republic of Mol- the realm of the Southeast Europe Association’s dova. Sandu is a former Minister of Education Workshop on current political developments and World Bank adviser. Hopes were high that and challenges in Moldova on the 13th and 14th under the new government the country could December 2019 in Berlin. The workshop gath- return to the reform path that had been ne- ered 50 politicians and experts from Moldova, glected in recent years. However, after the fall as well as experts from Germany and other EU of the government on 12 November 2019 follow- countries to discuss the key challenges Moldo- ing a no-confidence vote in parliament, the sit- va faced in 2019 and to give an outlook on what uation seems once again unclear and snap lies ahead in 2020. elections likely. Besides, taking stock of the country’s turbulent In order to shed light on the recent develop- political year 2019, the panels addressed more ments and a turbulent year in Moldova, the specific issues such as reforms, the economy, workshop aimed to take stock of domestic poli- migration, energy as well as foreign policy with tics in 2019 and the prospects for 2020, the a specific focus on the two main external actors state of institutional reforms and the country’s Russia and the EU. Discussions benefited from agenda, Moldova’s economic situation, as well two background papers which have been pub- as its international politics. In order to under- lished in the SOG’s online paper series. As the stand the latest developments and to draw workshop took place under the Chatham House conclusions for the future, also the develop- Rule, discussions are summarized without nam- ments witnessed during the last decade were ing speakers. considered. In 2009, Moldova was already in a similar situation, with the change of govern- Background ment from the Party of Communists to the ‘Alli- After years of polarization between self-de- ance for European Integration’ coalition. Despite clared ‘pro-Russian’ and ‘pro-EU’ camps, the fo- of high hopes for change, domestic politics cus of Moldovan politics seemed lately to be were soon characterized by an infinite struggle shifting from geopolitics to domestic reforms. for power among domestic elites. When it The parliamentary elections on 24 February comes to reforms, the formal adoption of poli- 2019 had split the votes between the Socialist cies to fight corruption, to increase the inde- Party of President Dodon (31.15 %), the reformist pendence of the judiciary, and to strengthen in- and grassroots ACUM platform (26.87 %), and the stitutions was rarely followed-up by proper im- until then ruling Democratic Party (23.62 %), and plementation. Thus, the question was what les- thus gave no single party an outright majority. sons should be drawn from past experience After months of deadlock, in June 2019 the So- and for international actors dealing with Mol- cialists and ACUM surprisingly reached an dova. 148 Südosteuropa Mitteilungen | 01 – 02 | 2020 Berichte Panel 1: Domestic Politics in 2019 elections. Among electoral malpractice, the The speakers of the panel unanimously agreed speakers mentioned the use of administrative that for Moldova, 2019 was a year of turbulence. resources and vote buying. The parliamentary elections in February ended in a constitutional crisis. The deadlock was ter- Of special concern was the lack of impartiality minated in June when a coalition government of media as well as fake news and the spread was formed by the Party of Socialists of the Re- of disinformation on social media. Due to polit- public of Moldova (PSRM, Socialists) and the ical connections of media owners, in particular ACUM electoral bloc. But the coalition govern- TV, national and regional media are used ment headed by Prime Minister Maia Sandu against political opponents. While many TV sta- (ACUM) lasted only until November when it was tions used to be controlled by Vladimir Plahot- brought down by a parliamentary no-confi- niuc, some speakers wondered how the Social- dence vote and was replaced by a new govern- ists managed to increase the number of televi- ment headed by former Minister of Finance Ion sion outlets affiliated with their party in a short Chicu. period of time. Another concern was the in- creasing presence of Russian state television on The various epithets used to describe these two the Moldovan media market. Another feature of governments are already indicative: While the electoral malpractice is the increasing amount Sandu government was described as an “im- of unaccountable money funneled into election possible” or “unnatural” coalition, or even an campaigns. This is both due to loopholes in leg- “unholy alliance”, the “technocratic” Chicu gov- islation as well as non-compliance by a wide- ernment which features a significant number of spread disregard of existing legislation. former advisers of President Igor Dodon was described as a “tacit coalition” between the So- The emergence of the Sandu coalition govern- cialists and the Democratic Party of Moldova ment and diverging goals within the coalition: (PDM, Democrats). While the ouster of the long- The main reasons for the creation of the “un- time grey cardinal behind the PDM, Vladimir natural” or “impossible” coalition between the Plahotniuc, was generally seen as a boon for previously opposed political forces PSRM and the political development of Moldova, concerns ACUM was the common goal to get rid of were raised about the potential emergence of a Vladimir Plahotniuc. The parties shared the in- new “strongman” – President Igor Dodon – terest of dismantling elements of the previous whose major goal is thought to be his reelec- regime, namely the strong control over political tion at the upcoming presidential elections institutions and monopolies over the economy. slated for the end of 2020. Rather than continu- A symbol of the pledge to work together was ing the reform agenda of the previous Sandu the Temporary Provisional Agreement that was government, the intention of the Chicu govern- signed by the parties. In the initial stage, a few ment was primarily to support president Dodon common objectives could be identified: First, in in achieving electoral victory in the next presi- the short-term to conduct a justice reform and dential elections. the depoliticization of state institutions. Sec- ond, to organize snap elections freely, based on Causes for the political turmoil: The main the new proportional electoral system. And thrust of arguments focused on Moldova as a third, there was to be a division of labor in ex- captured state with profound problems with ternal policy: The Sandu government and ACUM good governance and the rule of law. As one were committed to restore good relations with speaker put it: Moldova is not divided by geo- the EU while Igor Dodon and the Socialists were politics or competing narratives about the past, to restore good relations with Russia. but by kleptocracy. Features of this weak state include an oversize role of oligarchs in politics The overall performance of the Sandu govern- and monopolies in the economy, as well as a ment was aptly summarized in the phrase: “one politicized judicial system and civil service. government, two parallel agendas.” The most These general issues with the rule of law have frequent metaphor most speakers appeared to significant effects on political campaigns and agree with was: “ACUM danced ballet while the Südosteuropa Mitteilungen | 01 – 02 | 2020 Berichte 149 Socialists were boxing.” The hardly hidden aim government was committed to restore good re- of this “boxing” approach of the Socialists was lations with the EU, Dodon and the Socialists to take up as many key positions in the “force intended to restore good relations with Russia. institutions” and the judiciary as possible. Meanwhile, the Sandu government was “danc- While some palpable reform progress helped to ing ballet” and pursuing its overarching goal to unlock money from the IMF, EU, and the EBRD, conduct uncompromising reforms. The key pil- the early collapse of the coalition prompted the lars of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Reports 2008–2009 2009–2010
    THE AMERICAN SCHOOL OF CLASSICAL STUDIES AT ATHENS Annual Reports 2008–2009 through 2009–2010 VISION The American School of Classical Studies at Athens strives to maintain and enhance its position as the preeminent center for the study of the Greek world from antiquity to the present day. MISSION The American School of Classical Studies at Athens (ASCSA) advances knowledge of Greece in all periods, as well as other areas of the classical world, by training young scholars, sponsoring and promoting archaeological fieldwork, providing resources for scholarly work, and disseminating research. The ASCSA is also charged by the Hellenic Ministry of Culture and Tourism with primary responsibility for all American archaeological research, and seeks to support the investigation, preservation, and presentation of Greece’s cultural heritage. PHILOSOPHY The study of Greece from antiquity to the present day is critical for understanding the civilizations, history and culture of the Mediterranean, Europe, and Western Asia. The ASCSA supports a multidisciplinary approach to Hellenic studies, encompassing the fields of archaeology, anthropology, the archaeological sciences, topography, architecture, epigraphy, numismatics, history, art, language, literature, philosophy, religion, and cultural studies. As an institution in Greece sponsored by a consortium of institutions of higher education in North America, the ASCSA makes its resources available to qualified scholars, promotes the highest standards of research and archaeological fieldwork, and shares the results of its work. Front cover: 2008–09 Members ascend the akropolis of Orchomenos on Trip III and stand atop its tower (October 2008). Back cover: Visits to the sites and monuments of Athens and Attica are a central part of the School’s academic program in the winter months.
    [Show full text]
  • [Imas] Barometrul Socio-Politic. Decembrie 2019
    barometrul socio-politic Republica Moldova decembrie 2019 raport elaborat de: Doru Petruţi – [email protected] www.imas.md metodologie eşanonare: stra*ficat, probabilist, tri-stadial; volum eşan%on: 1090 respondenţi, 18 ani şi peste; criterii de straficare: 12 unităţi administra*v-teritoriale (UAT). mediu rezidenţial (urban-rural). mărimea localităţilor urbane (2 *puri). *pul localităţilor rurale (centru de comună/sat aparţinător); stadii de randomizare: localitatea (90 localităţi selectate), gospodăria, persoana; reprezenta%vitatea: eşan*onul este reprezenta*v pentru populaţia adultă a Republicii Moldova, exclusiv Transnistria; eroarea maximă de eşan*onare este de ±3.0%; interviurile: au fost realizate la domiciliile respondenţilor de către 48 operatori din reţeaua [imas], în limbile română şi rusă; perioada de culegere a datelor: 02 – 14 decembrie 2019; comanditar sondaj: Public Media Grup structură eşan%on …profil socio-demografic variabila grup număr de persoane procent masculin 494 45.3% gen feminin 596 54.7% 18-25 ani 93 8.5% 26-40 ani 253 23.2% vârsta 41-55 ani 261 23.9% 56-70 ani 374 34.3% peste 71 ani 109 10.1% studii medii incomplete 139 12.8% șc. generală sau profesională 527 48.3% educaţie liceu/șc. postliceală/colegiu 173 15.9% studii superioare 247 22.7% nu răspunde 4 0.3% încadrat în câmpul muncii 374 34.3% temporar nu lucrează 143 13.1% ocupaţie nu lucrează 571 52.4% nu răspunde 2 0.2% moldovean/român 860 78.9% naţionalitate altele (rus, ucrainean etc.) 228 20.9% nu răspunde 2 0.2% municipii 275 25.2% mediu rezidenţă alte orașe 234 21.5% sate 581 53.3% total 1090 100.0% *Datele nu au fost ponderate.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova/Transdniestria: Steps Forward, Stumbles Back
    In: IFSH (ed.), OSCE Yearbook 2018, Baden-Baden 2019, pp. 193-204. William H. Hill Moldova/Transdniestria: Steps Forward, Stumbles Back Introduction The Moldova-Transdniestria political settlement process achieved substantial progress over the past year, beginning with significant agreements adopted and implemented in November 2017, and continuing steadily to the time of writing in September 2018. Several long-standing practical disputed issues in the so- called “package of eight” were resolved in November 2017, most notably the opening of the Gura Bîcului Bridge.1 This key span on the main route through Moldova from the Black Sea towards the Baltic region had been closed since it was damaged in the fighting in June 1992, even after its repair in 2001. A successful meeting of the 5+2 in late November was followed by a strong programmatic statement agreed at the December OSCE Ministerial Council Meeting in Vienna, welcoming the remarkable progress achieved and confirm- ing support of all participating States for the “small-steps” approach adopted by the OSCE under recent Chairmanships. The Italian 2018 OSCE Chairman- ship continued along the same line, appointing former Foreign Minister Franco Frattini as Special Representative. Sufficient progress was achieved to hold a formal 5+2 session in late May. The settlement process continued with a high level of activity through the summer, with especially frequent, active contact between Chişinău and Tiraspol. As Special Representative Frattini visited the region in September 2018, most points in the “package of eight” had been agreed and implemented, and participants were examining how and where this remarkable progress in the settlement process might be extended.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova Parliamentary Elections, 30 November
    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION TO THE PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS IN REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA (30 November 2014) Report by Igor ŠOLTES, Chair of the Delegation Annexes: A - List of Participants and Programme B - EP Delegation press statement C - Preliminary Findings and Conclusions Introduction On 18 September 2014, the Conference of Presidents authorised the sending of an Election Observation Delegation, composed of 7 Members, to observe the parliamentary elections in Moldova, scheduled for 30 November 2014. The participation of one of the members was canceled in last moment. Due to the impossibility to obtain a new accreditation for a replacing member, because of closed deadline for registration, the delegation was composed only of 6 members of the European Parliament. They represented five different EU countries and five different political groups according to the rotating d'Hondt system. The delegation included: Igor ŠOLTES (Head of delegation, Slovenia, Greens/EFA), Alberto CIRIO (Italy, EPP), Andi CRISTEA (Romania, S&D), Soraya POST (Sweden, S&D), Kristina WINBERG (Sweden, EFDD) and Konstantinos PAPADAKIS (Greece, NI). The Delegation conducted its activities in Moldova between 27 November and 2 December 2014. Following the usual practice in the OSCE area, the EP Delegation was integrated in the International Election Observation Mission (IEOM) organised by the ODIHR, and cooperated together with the Parliamentary Assemblies of the OSCE and the Council of Europe present on the ground. According to the preliminary findings and conclusions, which were as well endorsed by the European Parliament, the elections in Moldova were well administrated offering a wide choice of political alternatives, with an election campaign influenced by geo-political aspirations and marked by the late de-registration of one electoral contestants.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE CAPTURE in the REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate Schoo
    THE PUBLIC HAS NO OUTRAGE LEFT: STATE CAPTURE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Conflict Resolution By Ryan Knight, B.A. Washington, DC April 23, 2019 THE PUBLIC HAS NO OUTRAGE LEFT: STATE CAPTURE IN THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Ryan Knight, B.A. Thesis Advisors: Molly Inman, Ph.D. and Alan Tidwell, Ph.D. ABSTRACT Since the theft of $1 billion from its economy in 2014, the Republic of Moldova’s nominally pro-European ruling coalition has failed to implement reforms needed to deal with endemic corruption. Instead, power has become increasingly centralized in the hands of controversial oligarch Vladimir Plahotniuc. This thesis tracks Plahotniuc’s consolidation of power and analyzes Moldova’s recent political history to define the unique characteristics of corruption in a small state. ii This thesis is dedicated to Moldovans working for justice. Thank you to all those generous souls who helped along the way. A special thanks to my thesis advisers, Dr. Molly Inman, and Dr. Alan Tidwell, for their patience and support through the writing process. Thank you as well to Igor Ciurea, Stephanie Roland, and Lyndon Allin for their long hours explaining Moldovan politics, to my graduate colleagues and friends, Brian Kerr and Anna Khandros, for their help and support during the writing and research of this thesis. And to my parents, Steve and Dianne, and my sister, Sarah, for their support over the years.
    [Show full text]
  • Paul Sarbanes Awarded Greece's Highest Honor
    ✽ CMYK CMYK ✽ O C V ΓΡΑΦΕΙ ΤΗΝ ΙΣΤΟΡΙΑ Bringing the news ΤΟΥ ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΥ to generations of ΑΠΟ ΤΟ 1915 The National Herald Greek Americans A WEEKLY GREEK AMERICAN PUBLICATION c v www.thenationalherald.com VOL. 11, ISSUE 555 May 31, 2008 $1.00 GREECE: 1.75 EURO Archbishop Demetrios Paul Sarbanes Awarded Greece’s Highest Honor Meets Church and Political Former U.S. Senator Honored with Order of Leaders in Moscow Visit The Phoenix Cross By National Herald Staff such a deep commitment to the Or- By George Kakarnias Special to The National Herald thodox Faith. Special to The National Herald In the evening, the Archbishop BOSTON – Archbishop Demetrios and the delegation were guests of ATHENS – Former U.S. Senator of America concluded a six day offi- Patriarch Alexios at a concert and Paul Sarbanes addressed an event cial visit in Moscow with meetings performance in the Auditorium of organized by the "Constantine and visits of the high ranking eccle- Christ the Savior Cathedral. The Karamanlis Institute for Democra- siastical and political leaders of performance, including music, po- cy" at a central Athens hotel on Russia. Archbishop Demetrios visit- etry and dance, were a continua- Monday, May 26, during a visit to ed Russia upon the invitation of Pa- tion of the celebration of Slavic Let- Greece where he was also be- triarch Alexios of Moscow and All ters Day. stowed Greece's highest honor, the Russia. According to News Releases Before the official visit to the Order of the Phoenix Cross, by the issued by the Greek Orthodox Arch- parliament of the Russian Federa- President of the Republic Karolos diocese of America, Archbishop tion, the Archbishop, accompanied Papoulias.
    [Show full text]
  • Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova September 11-October 16, 2018 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research. The fieldwork was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (with the exception of Transnistria) between September 11 and October 16, 2018 through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The sample consisted of 1,503 permanent residents of Moldova aged 18 and older and eligible to vote and is representative of the general population by gender, region and settlement size. • Sampling frame: Moldova Statistical Databank. Weighting: Data weighted for 11 regional groups, urban/rural and gender. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with the random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage one: All districts of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups; all regions (with the exception of Transnistria) were surveyed. • Stage two: Selection of the settlements (cities and villages). • Settlements were selected at random. • The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of settlement in each region. • Stage three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 percent for the full sample. • The response rate was 68 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding. • The survey was
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova February 9, 2021 – March 16, 2021 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Ipsos on behalf of the International Republican Institute's Center for Insights in Survey Research (CISR). The survey fieldwork was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (except for Transnistria) between February 9, 2021, and March 16, 2021, through computer-assisted phone interviews (CATI) using a dual-frame survey mode consisting of both mobile phones and landline phones. • Mobile interviews: random selection of respondents using randomly generated mobile numbers of all Moldovan cellphone providers • Landline interviews: • Stage one: All districts (raions) of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups; all regions (with the exception of Transnistria) were surveyed. For all districts (raions) of Moldova numbers were randomly generated for each raion using raion prefixes • Stage two: Respondents were selected in households using the "last birthday" selection principle • The sample, including an oversample of Chisinau, consisted of n=2,001 permanent residents of Moldova aged 18 and older and eligible to vote and is representative of the general population by age, gender, region and settlement size. • Sampling frame: Moldova Statistical Databank. Weighting: Data was weighted for phone ownership, age groups, gender and settlement type using the last available population figures by the National Bureau of Statistics. For national-level analysis, the Chisinau oversample was weighted back down to its national proportion. • The margin of error for the mid-range of the full, national sample does not exceed ±2.4 points at the 95% confidence level. • The margin of error for the mid-range of the full Chisinau sample does not exceed ±4.2 points at the 95% confidence level.
    [Show full text]
  • OSW Commentary
    OSW Commentary CENTRE FOR EASTERN STUDIES NUMBER 321 10.03.2020 www.osw.waw.pl A pseudo-multi-vector policy. Moldova under the socialists Kamil Całus In November 2019 a new government took power in Moldova under Ion Chicu as prime minister. Formally non-partisan, the new cabinet is in fact controlled by President Igor Dodon and the pro-Rus- sian Party of Socialists of the Republic of Moldova (PSRM). The establishment of this government brought an end to the five-month political experiment of Maia Sandu’s coalition government, which was composed of the pro-Western ACUM bloc and the Socialists. In essence, the takeover of power by the latter means a halt to any real reforms, a worsening of relations with the West, and a far smaller chance that the legal proceedings currently underway into the country’s biggest corruption scandals will have a positive outcome. Also, the multi-vector foreign policy declared by the government and President Dodon, which is aimed at maintaining good relations with both Russia and the EU, will in practice increase the Kremlin’s influence in Moldova. Although President Dodon has gathered quite a significant amount of power, his situation remains uncertain. He does not control the parliamentary majority, and is forced to rely on the support of the Democratic Party of Moldova (PDM), which has been weakened by the crisis. The main challenge for Dodon is the presidential election which is scheduled for the end of this year. However, the weak and increasingly fragmented pro-European opposition plays into the hands of Dodon and his group.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova November 16, 2019 – December 8, 2019 Detailed Methodology • The survey fieldwork was carried out by Magenta Consulting on behalf of the International Republican Institute’s Center for Insights in Survey Research. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (with the exception of Transnistria) between November 16, 2019 and December 8, 2019 through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The sample consisted of n=1,204 permanent residents of Moldova aged 18 and older and eligible to vote and is representative of the general population by age, gender, region and settlement size. • Sampling frame: Moldova Statistical Databank. Weighting: Data was weighted for age groups and gender using newly released population figures by the National Bureau of Statistics. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage one: All districts (raions) of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups; all regions (with the exception of Transnistria) were surveyed. • Stage two: Selection of the settlements (cities and villages). • Settlements were selected at random. • The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of settlement in each region. • Stage three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.8 points at the 95% confidence level. • The response rate was 62 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent
    [Show full text]
  • ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION to the PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS in MOLDOVA (30 October 2016 and 13 November 2016) Report by Igor S
    ELECTION OBSERVATION DELEGATION TO THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN MOLDOVA (30 October 2016 and 13 November 2016) Report by Igor SOLTES, Head of the Delegation Annexes: A. First round of elections, programme, list of participants and statement of the Chair of the EP Delegation. B. IEOM Preliminary Findings and Conclusions C. IEOM Joint Press Statement D. Second round of elections, programme, list of participants and statement of the Chair of the EP Delegation. E. IEOM Preliminary Findings and Conclusions F. IEOM Joint Press Statement Introduction Following an invitation from the Chairman of the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Moldova, the Conference of Presidents of the European Parliament authorised, on 30 June 2016, the sending of an Election Observation Delegation to observe the presidential elections in Moldova scheduled for 30 October 2016, with a possible second round on 13 November if no candidate obtained 50% of the votes cast. The European Parliament Election Observation Delegation on the first round was composed of five Members: Mr Igor ŠOLTES, (Greens/EFA, Slovenia), Mr Siegfried MUREŞAN, (EPP, Romania), Ms Heidi HAUTALA, Greens/EFA, Finland), Mr Fabio Massimo CASTALDO, (EFDD, Italy), Mr Janusz KORWIN- MIKKE, (NI, Poland). Mr ŠOLTES was elected Chair of the Delegation at the constituent meeting on 13 October 2016. Following the first round, in which no candidate received more than 50% of the votes cast, a delegation was sent to observe the second round on 13 November. This delegation was composed of the following Members: Igor SOLTES (Greens/EFA Slovenia (Chair), Siegfried MUREŞAN (EPP, Romania), Maria GRAPINI (S&D, Romania), Fabio Massimo CASTALDO (EFDD, Italy) and Janusz KORWIN-MIKKE (NI, Poland).
    [Show full text]
  • Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova
    Public Opinion Survey: Residents of Moldova May 8, 2019 – June 10, 2019 Detailed Methodology • The survey was coordinated by Dr. Rasa Alisauskiene from Baltic Surveys/The Gallup Organization on behalf of the Center for Insights in Survey Research. The field work was carried out by Magenta Consulting. • Data was collected throughout Moldova (with the exception of Transnistria) between May 8, 2019 and June 10, 2019 through face-to-face interviews in respondents’ homes. • The main sample consisted of 1,243 permanent residents of Moldova aged 18 and older and eligible to vote and is representative of the general population by age, gender, region and settlement size. 300 booster interviews were conducted in Chisinau. 617 Chisinau residents were interviewed in total.* • Sampling frame: Moldova Statistical Databank. Weighting: There are 2 weight coefficients calculated. Data of the main sample was weighted for 11 regional groups, urban/rural and gender. The data of Chisinau was weighted separately. • A multistage probability sampling method was used, with the random route and next birthday respondent selection procedures. • Stage one: All districts of Moldova are grouped into 11 groups; all regions (with the exception of Transnistria) were surveyed. • Stage two: Selection of the settlements (cities and villages). • Settlements were selected at random. • The number of settlements selected in each region was proportional to the share of population living in the particular type of settlement in each region. • Stage three: Primary sampling units were described. • The margin of error does not exceed plus or minus 2.5 percent. • The response rate was 59 percent. • Charts and graphs may not add up to 100 percent due to rounding.
    [Show full text]