2018 MS NHBB Nationals Bee Round 9
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Engaging with the Trans-East Asian Cultural Tradition in Modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Literatures, 1880S-1940S
Afterlives of the Culture: Engaging with the Trans-East Asian Cultural Tradition in Modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Literatures, 1880s-1940s The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Hashimoto, Satoru. 2014. Afterlives of the Culture: Engaging with the Trans-East Asian Cultural Tradition in Modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Literatures, 1880s-1940s. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:13064962 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Afterlives of the Culture: Engaging with the Trans-East Asian Cultural Tradition in Modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Literatures, 1880s-1940s A dissertation presented by Satoru Hashimoto to The Department of East Asian Languages and Civilizations in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of East Asian Languages and Civilizations Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2014 ! ! © 2014 Satoru Hashimoto All rights reserved. ! ! Dissertation Advisor: Professor David Der-Wei Wang Satoru Hashimoto Afterlives of the Culture: Engaging with the Trans-East Asian Cultural Tradition in Modern Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese Literatures, 1880s-1940s Abstract This dissertation examines how modern literature in China, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan in the late-nineteenth to the early-twentieth centuries was practiced within contexts of these countries’ deeply interrelated literary traditions. -
Chinese Literature in the Second Half of a Modern Century: a Critical Survey
CHINESE LITERATURE IN THE SECOND HALF OF A MODERN CENTURY A CRITICAL SURVEY Edited by PANG-YUAN CHI and DAVID DER-WEI WANG INDIANA UNIVERSITY PRESS • BLOOMINGTON AND INDIANAPOLIS William Tay’s “Colonialism, the Cold War Era, and Marginal Space: The Existential Condition of Five Decades of Hong Kong Literature,” Li Tuo’s “Resistance to Modernity: Reflections on Mainland Chinese Literary Criticism in the 1980s,” and Michelle Yeh’s “Death of the Poet: Poetry and Society in Contemporary China and Taiwan” first ap- peared in the special issue “Contemporary Chinese Literature: Crossing the Bound- aries” (edited by Yvonne Chang) of Literature East and West (1995). Jeffrey Kinkley’s “A Bibliographic Survey of Publications on Chinese Literature in Translation from 1949 to 1999” first appeared in Choice (April 1994; copyright by the American Library Associ- ation). All of the essays have been revised for this volume. This book is a publication of Indiana University Press 601 North Morton Street Bloomington, IN 47404-3797 USA http://www.indiana.edu/~iupress Telephone orders 800-842-6796 Fax orders 812-855-7931 Orders by e-mail [email protected] © 2000 by David D. W. Wang All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. The Association of American University Presses’ Resolution on Permissions constitutes the only exception to this prohibition. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences— Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. -
2015 Mil History Autobiography Field
The information given in this document is not to be communicated either directly or indirectly to the press or to any person not holding an official position in the service of the Government of India/ State Government of the Union of India. PRE STAFF COURSE - 2015 MIL HISTORY AUTOBIOGRAPHY FIELD MARSHALL THE VISCOUNT WILLIAM SLIM PUBLISHED BY THE DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF MILITARY TRAINING (MT-2) INTEGRATED HEADQUARTERS OF MoD (ARMY) i MIL HISTORY AUTOBIOGRAPHY FIELD MARSHALL THE VISCOUNT WILLIAM SLIM TABLE OF CONTENTS S No Chapter Contents Page No 1. Chapter 1 Introduction 1-2 2. Chapter 2 Early Life till the Burma Campaign: 3-12 Opportunities And Lessons Learnt (1891-1942) 3. Chapter 3 The Burma Campaign: Retreat (15 January to 13-24 15 May 1942) 4. Chapter 4 The Burma Campaign: Rebuild (16 May 1942 25-30 to 15 October 1943) 5. Chapter 5 The Burma Campaign: Redemption 31-73 (16 October 1943 to 14 August 1945) 6. Chapter 6 Evaluation of Slim as a Military Leader 74-82 7. Chapter 7 Conclusion 83-86 8. Chapter 8 Questionnaire 87 ii ILLUSTRATIONS S No Sketch Page No 88 1. Sketch 1- Map of Gallabat, 1940 2. Sketch 2- Map of Deir-Ez-Zor, 1941 89 3. Sketch 3- Burma And South-East Asia, December 1941 90 4. Sketch 4- Japanese Onslaught, December 1941-May 1942 91 5. Sketch 5- Japanese Ha-Go Offensive, February 1944 92 6. Sketch 6- Operation Thursday, February 1944 93 7. Sketch 7- Japanese Thrust on Imphal-Kohima 94 8. Sketch 8- Capital and Extended Capital 95 9. -
H-Diplo Roundtable- Assuming the Burden , Foster on Lawrence
H-Diplo Roundtable- Assuming the Burden , Foster on Lawrence Mark Atwood Lawrence, Assuming the Burden: Europe and the American Commitment to War in Vietnam (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005) Roundtable Editor: Thomas Maddux Reviewers: Anne Foster, Indiana State University, Shawn McHale, George Washington University, Lien-Hang T. Nguyen, Harvard University, Douglas Porch, Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, Martin Thomas, Exeter University, UK Commentary by Anne L. Foster, Indiana State University In his introduction, Mark Lawrence asks “How did a faraway corner of the French empire acquire such significance that Americans saw fit to intervene with economic and military aid?” The question is so ubiquitous in works on Vietnam that it has become nearly rhetorical, but Lawrence is actually interested in the answer. He explores how Vietnam, in the years after World War II, gained sufficient international importance in Paris, London and Washington to prompt the latter two countries to pursue the policies of their most hawkish officials in support of French ambitions to retain Vietnam, or at least to determine its form of government. It is a deeply appealing work. He deftly moves among viewpoints of French, British, and US officials, demonstrating the interplay of ideas, policies and men which led to outcomes different from those any one nation wanted at the outset. He convincingly argues for the contingent nature of policy in the late 1940s, especially in the United States. U.S. officials may have realized that the United States would wage a Cold War but it was not yet obvious whose strategy for winning would prevail. -
World Bank Document
World Bank-financed Project Public Disclosure Authorized Gansu Revitalization and Innovation Project Social Assessment Report Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Gansu Project Management Office Public Disclosure Authorized April 2019 Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 SA TASKS ............................................................................................................................................. 3 1.3 SA METHODS ........................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3.1 Organizational interview and literature collection ............................................................................. 3 1.3.2 FGD ................................................................................................................................................... 4 1.3.3 Key informant interview ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.3.4 Questionnaire survey ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.3.5 Field investigation ............................................................................................................................ -
The Organizational Evolution of Oss Detachment 101 In
THE ORGANIZATIONAL EVOLUTION OF OSS DETACHMENT 101 IN BURMA, 1942-1945 A Dissertation by TROY JAMES SACQUETY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2008 Major Subject: History THE ORGANIZATIONAL EVOLUTION OF OSS DETACHMENT 101 IN BURMA, 1942-1945 A Dissertation by TROY JAMES SACQUETY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Brian McAllister Linn Committee Members, James C. Bradford H.W. Brands Richard M. Crooks Arnold Krammer Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger May 2008 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Organizational Evolution of OSS Detachment 101 in Burma, 1942-1945. (May 2008) Troy James Sacquety, B.A., Mary Washington College; M.A., University of Nebraska-Lincoln Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Brian McAllister Linn The Office of Strategic Services (OSS), was created during the Second World War to be a central collector, producer, and disseminator of foreign intelligence. Its secondary role of clandestine warfare did not come easily. One OSS unit, Detachment 101, surmounted numerous problems to become a model clandestine and special operations unit able to create its own indigenous army that waged war behind Japanese lines in Burma. This study uses previously unexplored primary source materials from the OSS records held by the U.S. National Archives to examine the unit and its organizational changes from 1942 to 1945. Detachment 101 succeeded in the China-Burma-India Theater (CBI) for the simple reason that it was able to function independent of immediate control from either the U.S. -
Chinax Course Notes
Part 6: The Manchus and the Qing 23: The Qing Vision of Empire Professor Mark Elliot taught most of this section, allowing us to benefit from his personal focus on the Qing and the Manchus. Professor Bol stepped in for one week to teach The Scholars and Prosperous Suzhou, which must have been his special interest. It was one of the most fascinating weeks of the course129 and by far the toughest. Historical Overview The origins of the Qing dynasty date back to the 1630s with a peasant rebellion led by Li Zicheng, a former postal official. Indeed, this may be the first recorded instance of an individual 'going postal.' 130 Li's rebellion spread through central China, drawing upon the anger of farmers, clerks, and soldiers who were devastated by, among other things, the inflation of copper currency against the silver required for tax payments.131 By the 1640s, the rebel army was moving toward Beijing. Meanwhile, the Manchus, descendents of the Jurchens of the Jin dynasty, were uniting tribal groups northeast of China, forging alliances with the eastern Mongols and raiding the Ming, all under the leadership of Nurhaci. By the late 1620s, the Ming had lost control of the northeast. Hong Taiji, Nurhaci's son and successor, re-organized and strengthened the Jin state, and in the 1630s conquered Korea, bolstering Manchu security and prestige. In 1636, Hong renamed his dynasty the Great Qing (da qing). In 1644, Li's rebels captured Beijing, leading the Ming emperor to hang himself. Shortly after that, the Ming general Wu Sangui, who was guarding the Great Wall at the Shanhai Pass, allied with the Manchus against Li Zicheng, deciding that he preferred the organized armies of the Manchus to the pillaging forces of the rebellion. -
Great Wall of China Ebcid:Com.Britannica.Oec2.Identifier.Articleidentifier?Tocid=9037891&Ar
Great Wall of China ebcid:com.britannica.oec2.identifier.ArticleIdentifier?tocId=9037891&ar... Great Wall of China Encyclopædia Britannica Article Introduction Chinese (Pinyin) Wanli Changcheng or (Wade-Giles romanization) Wan-li Ch'ang-ch'eng (“10,000-Li Long Wall”) extensive bulwark erected in ancient China, one of the largest building-construction projects ever undertaken. The Great Wall actually consists of numerous walls—many of them parallel to each other—built over some two millennia across northern China and southern Mongolia. The most extensive and best-preserved version of the wall dates from the Ming dynasty (1368–1644) and Great Wall of China, eastern runs for some 5,500 miles (8,850 km) east to west from Mount Hu Asia, designated a near Dandong, southeastern Liaoning province, to Jiayu Pass west World Heritage site in 1987. of Jiuquan, northwestern Gansu province. This wall often traces the crestlines of hills and mountains as it snakes across the Chinese countryside, and about one-fourth of its length consists solely of natural barriers such as rivers and mountain ridges. Nearly all of the rest (about 70 percent of the total length) is actual constructed wall, with the small remaining stretches constituting ditches or moats. Although lengthy sections of the wall are now in ruins or have disappeared completely, it is still one of the more remarkable structures on Earth. The Great Wall was designated a UNESCO World Heritage site in 1987. Large parts of the fortification system date from the 7th through the 4th century BCE. In the 3rd century BCE Shihuangdi (Qin Shihuang), the first emperor of a united China (under the Qin dynasty), connected a number of existing defensive walls into a single system. -
170 Proceedings of the Society, 1956-57
170 PROCEEDING E SOCIETYTH F O S , 1956-57. XI. BANNOCKBURN—23RD AND 24TH JUNE 1314. A STUD MILITARN YI Y HISTORY. BY GENERAL SIR PHILIP CHRISTISON, BT., G.B.E., C.B., D.S.O., M.C., D.L., B.A., F.S.A.ScoT. Much controvers s rageha y d ovee sitf thith ro e s decisive battln ei Scottish history, and over the numbers engaged in it. Until comparatively recently most historians were content to accept the "traditional" location in the neighbourhood of the Borestone, given by Nimmo in his History of Stirlingshire, 1771; Nimmo does not state his authority earliese th t tbu , appearanc prinn ei referencn i t Borestone th o et e John i s i n Mackay' JourneyA s through Scotland, publishe 1723n i e d H . says, "On my road, near a village called St Ringin remains the stone, whicn i h King Robert Bruce's standar famoue fixes th t dwa da s battlf eo Bannockburn." He does not say that the battle itself actually took place coursf thereo d ean , standard. s up wer t se e t borneno d ,an That very accurate historian, Lord Hailes, writing in 1779 after reading Barbou visitind an r grounde gth , specifically disagrees with Nimmo (Annals of Scotland, n, 42) and places the battle "on a field which had Stirling on the left, and the brook of Bannock on the right." An account of St Ninian's parish written about the same time as Mackay, place battl e Pelstrea e o. sth f th efurtheNE a e mth o rt (Macfarlane' milo s r eo s Geogr. -
The Great Wall of China by Vickie Chao
Name Date The Great Wall of China By Vickie Chao The Great Wall of China is like a long winding dragon. It stretches more than 4,000 miles from east to west. For thousands of years, this fortification helped block the advances of northern nomadic tribes. The sheer size of the entire construction is so vast that it is one of the largest building projects ever carried out in human history! Recognizing its architectural achievement and historical significance, UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization) added the Great Wall of China to its World Heritage List in 1987. Contrary to what many people may think, the Great Wall of China was not a one-time effort. It was, in fact, an on-going one with its origin dating back to the 7th century B.C. China was not a unified country back then. There were many warlords, each with a claim to a part of China. Among those warlords, one from the state of Chu began to use packed earth to build a wall around his territory. He called it the "Square Wall." When warlords from other states saw how effective the Square Wall was for defense, they began to follow suit. For the next several hundred years, there were many Square Walls in China. In 221 B.C., Ying Zheng, the warlord from the state of Qin, eradicated all other warlords and unified China. He established a dynasty called Qin and proclaimed himself "Shih Huangdi," meaning "The First Emperor" in Chinese. About the same time, a northern nomadic tribe called Xiongnu grew aggressive and became an imminent threat to Qin. -
Kata Pengantar
KATA PENGANTAR Undang-Undang No. 43 Tahun 2009 tentang Kearsipan mengamanatkan Arsip Nasional Republik Indonesia (ANRI) untuk melaksanakan pengelolaan arsip statis berskala nasional yang diterima dari lembaga negara, perusahaan, organisasi politik, kemasyarakatan dan perseorangan. Pengelolaan arsip statis bertujuan menjamin keselamatan dan keamanan arsip sebagai bukti pertanggungjawaban nasional dalam kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara. Arsip statis yang dikelola oleh ANRI merupakan memori kolektif, identitas bangsa, bahan pengembangan ilmu pengetahuan, dan sumber informasi publik. Oleh karena itu, untuk meningkatkan mutu pengolahan arsip statis, maka khazanah arsip statis yang tersimpan di ANRI harus diolah dengan benar berdasarkan kaidah-kaidah kearsipan sehingga arsip statis dapat ditemukan dengan cepat, tepat dan lengkap. Pada tahun anggaran 2016 ini, salah satu program kerja Sub Bidang Pengolahan Arsip Pengolahan I yang berada di bawah Direktorat Pengolahan adalah menyusun Guide Arsip Presiden RI: Sukarno 1945-1967. Guide arsip ini merupakan sarana bantu penemuan kembali arsip statis bertema Sukarno sebagai Presiden dengan kurun waktu 1945-1967 yang arsipnya tersimpan dan dapat diakses di ANRI. Seperti kata pepatah, “tiada gading yang tak retak”, maka guide arsip ini tentunya belum sempurna dan masih ada kekurangan. Namun demikian guide arsip ini sudah dapat digunakan sebagai finding aid untuk mengakses dan menemukan arsip statis mengenai Presiden Sukarno yang tersimpan di ANRI dalam rangka pelayanan arsip statis kepada pengguna arsip (user). Akhirnya, kami mengucapkan banyak terima kasih kepada pimpinan ANRI, anggota tim, Museum Kepresidenan, Yayasan Bung Karno dan semua pihak yang telah membantu penyusunan guide arsip ini hingga selesai. Semoga Allah SWT, Tuhan Yang Maha Esa membalas amal baik yang telah Bapak/Ibu/Saudara berikan. -
The London Gazette of FRIDAY, 6Th APRIL, 1951
39195 1881 SECOND SUPPLEMENT TO The London Gazette OF FRIDAY, 6th APRIL, 1951 Registered as a Newspaper THURSDAY, 12 APRIL, 1951 .The War Office, 1951. OPERATIONS IN BURMA FROM 12th NOVEMBER, 1944, TO 15th AUGUST, 1945 NOTE.—A set of maps for this Despatch is on separate sale at Is. Od. net. This set of maps also covers the operations described in the other Army and Air Despatches of the Burma Campaign from 16th November, 1943 to 12th September, 1945. The following Despatch was submitted to the Finally, I have attached a table of contents Secretary of State for War on the 4th of the Despatch and two other Appendices to February, 1947, by LIEUTENANT- which reference is made in the body of the GENERAL SIR OLIVER LEESE, Bart., Despatch. K.C.B., C.B.E., D.S.O., Commander-in- PART I Chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East NARRATIVE OF OPERATIONS Asia. SECTION I (paras. 2-18) THE SITUATION ON INTRODUCTION TAKING OVER COMMAND Location of my H.Q.: Constitution of the 1. This Despatch covers the period from the command: Note on the topography and climate 12th November, 1944, on which date I of Burma: The task: Strategic plans already assumed the appointment of Commander-in- in existence: The new directive. chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East Asia, to the 15th August, 1945, when the Japanese 2. I took over 11 Army Group from General surrendered and when I relinquished my Sir George Giffard on the 12th November, appointment. I have included the planning 1944, with the new title of Commander-in- for subsequent operations, as it was initiated Chief, Allied Land Forces, South-East Asia.