(Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Rocky Mountain Streams

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Great Basin Naturalist Volume 56 Number 4 Article 1 11-21-1996 Species-environment relationships among filter-feeding caddisflies (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Rocky Mountain streams Timothy B. Mihuc Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho G. Wayne Minshall Idaho State University, Pocatello, Idaho Janet R. Mihuc Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Mihuc, Timothy B.; Minshall, G. Wayne; and Mihuc, Janet R. (1996) "Species-environment relationships among filter-feeding caddisflies (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) in Rocky Mountain streams," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 56 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol56/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Great Basin Naturalist PUBLISHED AT PROVO, UTAH, BY BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY [SSN 0017-3614 VOLUME 56 31 OCTOBER 1996 o. 4 Great Basin Naluralist 56(4), © 1996, pp. 287-293 SPECIES-ENVIRONMENT RELATIONSHIPS AMONG FILTER-FEEDING CADDISFLIES (TRICHOPTERA: HYDROPSYCHIDAE) IN ROCKY MOUNTAIN STREAMS TImothy B. Mihuc1,2, G.Wayne MinshalJ!, and Janet R. Mihuc3 ABSTRACT.-Species-enviTonmenl relationships were determined fOT filter-feeding macroinvertebrates from 55 Rocky Mountain stream sites to establish species distribution patterns. Species abundance and 20 environmental vari­ ables were measured at each site with species-envkonment relationships determined using canonical correspondence analysis and stepwise multiple regression. Results suggest that the distribution of several taxa was strongly related to upstream-downstream environmental gradients. ArctOPSYCM grandis abundance increased with stream size (width and depth) and decreased with increasing turbulence (Reynolds number). Brachycentru.s abundance also increa~ed with stream sire {depth). Hydropsyche abundance increased with increasing ba.seflow. PMapsyche elsis abundance demon­ strn.ted negative correlation with depth, Froude number, and conductivity. Taxa followed previously reported patteros, partitioning habitat according to stream size. Arctopsyche grandis, Brachycent1'W. and Hydropsyche were found in larger (3rd- to 6th·order) streams, while P(Uapsydut elsis was obseT\led in small headwater (lst- and 2nd-order) streams. Other filter-feeding taxa such as Stmulium, Pisiditml, and ostracods exhibited little or no apparent habitat partitioning among stream sites. Key lJ)cm:ls: species-environment relationships. fJter feeders. Rocky Mountain streams. Benthic macroinvertebrates adapted for re­ Minshall 1990, Richardson and Mackay 1991). moving particles from suspension (filter feeders) Many studies have determined filterer associa­ are an important component ofstream commu­ tions with food resources and environmental nities. Distribution patterns and habitat associ­ factors such as water velocity or temperature ations among 6lterers have been well docu­ (e.g., Edington 1968, Wallace 1974, Haddock mented, particularly for members of the Tri­ 1977, Wallace and Merritt 1980, A1stad 1982, choptera family Hydropsychidae (e.g., Decamps Hauer and Stanford 1982, Bruns et al. 1987, 1968, Edington and Hildrew 1973, Gordon Osborne and Herricks 1987, Wetmore et. al. and Wallace 1975, Wallace and Merritt 1980, 1990, Voelz and Ward 1992). Few studies have Ross and Wallace 1982, Tachet et al. 1992) and considered the entire filterer component found for lake outlet communities (e.g., Robinson and in natural (unimpounded, unregulated) streams lStream Ec¢logy Center, Dep,u:tment of Biological Sciences, ld.bo State University, Pocatello. ID 83209-8007. 2PreW(lt addl'e~: Loui.suUla Coopenttive Fhberies and wildHre R~-oo. Unit, School of Fore~tty, Wildlife and FI~he'ies. Lo"i>;iana State Unive""ity. Bat,," Rooge, LA 7Q8OJ. 3.Biology Prog,rllm, 104 Ufe Sc.ienl:e$ Buildins. Louis:illJla Stille Unive,-,ity. Baron Roug¢. LA 70803. 287 2.88 GREAT BASIN NATUJIAUST [Volume 56 and distribution pattems of filterer species as temperature at the time of sampling) and with respect to a wide range of environmental minimum temperature (the freezing point of variahles (Edington and Hildrew 1973, Gordon water). Water chemistry variables included and Wallace 1975, Boon 1978, Ross and Wal­ hardness, alkalinity, pH, and specific conduc­ bee 1982). OUf objective was to assess the dis­ tance. Other biotic variables measured at each tribution patterns of filter feeders in unim­ stream reach were chlorophyll a (n = 5 per pounded Rocky Mountain, USA, streams to site), ash-fi·ee dry mass (AFDM) of periphyton determine relationships with specific environ­ (n = 5 per site), biomass/chlorophyll ratio of menlill variables includin~ flow parameters; periphyton (B/C), and benthic organic matter stream size, depth, and width; benthic organic content (BOM; 11 = 5 per site). This study did matter content; slope; water chemistry; peri­ not address food resources or food acquisition phyton hiomass; and temperature. \,Vhile many among filte.. feeders; therefore sampling of studies have considered current velocity, tem­ transported and henthic nne particulate mater­ perature, <Jnd food relationships, partitioning ial was not included in sampling protocol. of habitat by IUter feeders in rclation to other Relationships between species and environ­ environmental variables is poorly known. mental variables were determined using canon­ ical correspondence analysis (Ter Braak 1986) METHODS and stepwise multiple regression. All compar­ isons ,\'ere made on reach-scale data (reach Stream siles encompassed the Rocky Moun­ means for all variables). Comparisons reflect lain region ii·om nurthern Wyoming to c-entral spatial diAerences among sites sampled in 1 Idaho, including 2.2. streams in Yellowslone season (summer) to determine hrge-scale distri­ National !'lu·k and 33 ill centml Idaho. Streams hution patterns offilter feeders in 1st- through ranged from 1st to 6th order in size (Tahle 1). 6th-order streams. Temporal patterns were not All sites were unimpounded and none were considered here. Canonical correspondence located below lake outflows. Yellowstone sites analysis (CCA) allows the investigator to inter­ were sampled each August /i·om 1988 to 1992.. pret multiple species responses along a gradi­ All other sites were sampled heh~!een July and ent of multiple environmental variables. This September during the ycar(s) indicated in analysis provides a useful interpretation of lable 1. Sampling methods were routine meth­ species-enviromnent relationships through the ods nsed in stream ecology (e.g., Platts ct al. resulting ordination plot. Once species~envi­ 1983). Briefly, henthic organisms were sam­ ronment eonelations were identified using plcd using a surher net (2.50 micron mesh) in CCA, multiple regression analysis was used to lime habilat at 5 tr,Ulsects located at 50-m inter­ further discern relationships between species vals along a stream reach (2.50 m total reach abundance and environmental variables. length). Samples were taken to a depth of 10 em. Mean density for each flItcrcr species \vith­ RESULTS in each stream reach \vas lIsed in statistical In the canonical correspondence analysis analyses to determine relationships with physi­ (Fig. 1) thc Ilrst ordination axis (x axis) ex­ cal variahles. Physical environmental variables plained 37.9% ofthe total species-environment measured. at each st.ream reach included stream relationship and the second (y axis) an addi­ order, slope, width, baseflow (1 transect), mean tional 30.7% (Table 2.). Results indicate that depth (n = 100 random measurements), m",m several envi.ronmental variables were impor~ water velocity (n = 100 random measurements), tant in explaining variation in species abun­ mcan embeddedness (11 = 100 random mca­ dance across sites (Fig. I). Arctopsyche grandis surements), and mean suLsh1tte size (n = 100 and Hydropsyche abundance related directly random measurements). Reach-scale means for to increasing baseflow, width, and stream order all variables were used in statistical analyses. (Fig. 1). Parapsyche elsi' abundance was inverse­ Width/depth ratio and scvcral hydraulic para­ ly related to increasing baseflow, width, and meters (mean Fronde numhel; mean Reynolds stream order. Brachycentnvs abundance related number) were calculated f.·om these measure­ primarily to depth, substrate size, .Reynolds ments. Annual sh'eam tcmpcmture range was number, and annual tempemture range (Fig. I). estimated from annual maximum (estimated Simuliwn, PiSidiu.f11.. and Ostracoda abundance 1996] FILTER-FEEDING 1NVERTERRATES IN ROCKY MOUNTAJN STREAMS 289 TABLt: L SummUlY ofthe 55 study streams. Sites are arranged by increasing stream order and tncrc:L'iLlig depth witbiu each order. Slrea". Sample dates Order Avg Avg Basellow Slope depth (m) width (m) (m/s) (%) Cach~. YNP 1988-1992 I 0.06 0.704 0.003 L2 E Blacktail Dt:!er, 'iN P 1988-1992 1 0.13 0.665 0.048 4.7 Twin, YNP 1988-J99'2 1 0.13 0.643 0.06 10.7 W Blacktail Deer, YNP 1988--1992 1 0.17 0.550 0.043 3.S F<l.iry. YNP 1988--199-2 I 0.23 0.307 0.066 1.0 Pinneer, ID 1990 2 0.05 0.342 0.13 6 DllltOO, 10 1990,91 2 0.06 0.109 0.07 17 Goat. 1D 1!Jl.X},91 2 0.06 0.089 0.05 18 Cache, y~p 1988--1992 2 0.09 0.764 0.012 10.1 Packhorse, ID 1991 2 0.09 0.4t3 0.04 4 Castle, 10 1992 2 0.09 0.160 0.03 U.5 Yellow, ID 1992 2 0.09 0.220 0.03 8 Rose, 'iN!' 1988-1992 2 0.10 0.416 0.027 7.S Sliver, IV 1991 2 0.10 0.243 0.04 5 EF Whimslick, ID 1991 2 0.10 0.460 0.02 2 Cache. YI\P 1988-1992 2 O.ll 0.832 0.012 8.8 Cliff, to 1988,90,91 2 0.12 00407 0.18 L2 Amphith~,tcr, Y:-.IP 198B---lOO2 2 0.13 1.11 0.146 4.9 POll)'. ID 1992 2 0.13 0.380 008 13 Iron Springs, YNP 1988---1992 2 0.14 0.237 0,1)38 13.1 E McCall.
Recommended publications
  • Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae) Based on DNA and Morphological Evidence Christy Jo Geraci National Museum on Natural History, Smithsonian Institute

    Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae) Based on DNA and Morphological Evidence Christy Jo Geraci National Museum on Natural History, Smithsonian Institute

    Clemson University TigerPrints Publications Biological Sciences 3-2010 Defining the Genus Hydropsyche (Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae) Based on DNA and Morphological Evidence Christy Jo Geraci National Museum on Natural History, Smithsonian Institute Xin Zhou University of Guelph John C. Morse Clemson University, [email protected] Karl M. Kjer Rutgers University - New Brunswick/Piscataway Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/bio_pubs Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Please use publisher's recommended citation. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Biological Sciences at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 2010, 29(3):918–933 ’ 2010 by The North American Benthological Society DOI: 10.1899/09-031.1 Published online: 29 June 2010 Defining the genus Hydropsyche (Trichoptera:Hydropsychidae) based on DNA and morphological evidence Christy Jo Geraci1 Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013-7012 USA Xin Zhou2 Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada John C. Morse3 Department of Entomology, Soils, and Plant Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634 USA Karl M. Kjer4 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901 USA Abstract. In this paper, we review the history of Hydropsychinae genus-level classification and nomenclature and present new molecular evidence from mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) and nuclear large subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (28S) markers supporting the monophyly of the genus Hydropsyche.
  • 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site

    2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site

    APPENDIX A 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site 04-1422-022.1 King County 2002 Benthic Macroinvertebrate Data Analyses FINAL August 2004 A-1 APPENDIX A - 2002 Benthic Sites with Data Types Available for Each Site Land WQ Hydrology Benthic Use Habitat Station WQ Station Hydrology Watershed Site Code Site Name Data Data Data Code Data Code Data Green-Duwamish 09BLA0675 Black 0675 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0716 Black 0716 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0722 Black 0722 x x x A326 x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0756 Black 0756 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0768 Black 0768 x x x 03B x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0768 Black 0768 Replicate x x x 03B x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0771 Black 0771 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0772 Black 0772 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0813 Black 0813 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0817 Black 0817 x x x Green-Duwamish 09BLA0817 Black 0817 Replicate x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1165 Covington Basin 1165 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1418 Covington Basin 1418 x x x C320 x Green-Duwamish 09COV1753 Covington Basin 1753 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1798 Covington Basin 1798 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1862 Covington Basin 1862 x x x Green-Duwamish 09COV1864 Covington Basin 1864 x x x Green-Duwamish Covington Basin Soos 03 x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2163 Deep/Coal Basin 2163 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2208 Deep/Coal Basin 2208 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2211 Deep/Coal Basin 2211 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2266 Deep/Coal Basin 2266 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2294 Deep/Coal Basin 2294 x x x Green-Duwamish 09DEE2294 Deep/Coal Basin 2294 Replicate x x x Green-Duwamish
  • Nabs 2004 Final

    Nabs 2004 Final

    CURRENT AND SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHIES ON BENTHIC BIOLOGY 2004 Published August, 2005 North American Benthological Society 2 FOREWORD “Current and Selected Bibliographies on Benthic Biology” is published annu- ally for the members of the North American Benthological Society, and summarizes titles of articles published during the previous year. Pertinent titles prior to that year are also included if they have not been cited in previous reviews. I wish to thank each of the members of the NABS Literature Review Committee for providing bibliographic information for the 2004 NABS BIBLIOGRAPHY. I would also like to thank Elizabeth Wohlgemuth, INHS Librarian, and library assis- tants Anna FitzSimmons, Jessica Beverly, and Elizabeth Day, for their assistance in putting the 2004 bibliography together. Membership in the North American Benthological Society may be obtained by contacting Ms. Lucinda B. Johnson, Natural Resources Research Institute, Uni- versity of Minnesota, 5013 Miller Trunk Highway, Duluth, MN 55811. Phone: 218/720-4251. email:[email protected]. Dr. Donald W. Webb, Editor NABS Bibliography Illinois Natural History Survey Center for Biodiversity 607 East Peabody Drive Champaign, IL 61820 217/333-6846 e-mail: [email protected] 3 CONTENTS PERIPHYTON: Christine L. Weilhoefer, Environmental Science and Resources, Portland State University, Portland, O97207.................................5 ANNELIDA (Oligochaeta, etc.): Mark J. Wetzel, Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 607 East Peabody Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.................................................................................................................6 ANNELIDA (Hirudinea): Donald J. Klemm, Ecosystems Research Branch (MS-642), Ecological Exposure Research Division, National Exposure Re- search Laboratory, Office of Research & Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 26 W. Martin Luther King Dr., Cincinnati, OH 45268- 0001 and William E.
  • Full Issue for TGLE Vol. 53 Nos. 1 & 2

    Full Issue for TGLE Vol. 53 Nos. 1 & 2

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 53 Numbers 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Numbers Article 1 1 & 2 - Spring/Summer 2020 Full issue for TGLE Vol. 53 Nos. 1 & 2 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation . "Full issue for TGLE Vol. 53 Nos. 1 & 2," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 53 (1) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol53/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. et al.: Full issue for TGLE Vol. 53 Nos. 1 & 2 Vol. 53, Nos. 1 & 2 Spring/Summer 2020 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Published by ValpoScholar, 1 The Great Lakes Entomologist, Vol. 53, No. 1 [], Art. 1 THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 2019–20 OFFICERS President Elly Maxwell President Elect Duke Elsner Immediate Pate President David Houghton Secretary Adrienne O’Brien Treasurer Angie Pytel Member-at-Large Thomas E. Moore Member-at-Large Martin Andree Member-at-Large James Dunn Member-at-Large Ralph Gorton Lead Journal Scientific Editor Kristi Bugajski Lead Journal Production Editor Alicia Bray Associate Journal Editor Anthony Cognato Associate Journal Editor Julie Craves Associate Journal Editor David Houghton Associate Journal Editor Ronald Priest Associate Journal Editor William Ruesink Associate Journal Editor William Scharf Associate Journal Editor Daniel Swanson Newsletter Editor Crystal Daileay and Duke Elsner Webmaster Mark O’Brien The Michigan Entomological Society traces its origins to the old Detroit Entomological Society and was organized on 4 November 1954 to “.
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • Silk Nets to Incipient Sediment Motion in Gravelbedded Streams

    Silk Nets to Incipient Sediment Motion in Gravelbedded Streams

    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface RESEARCH ARTICLE A mechanistic model linking insect (Hydropsychidae) 10.1002/2013JF003024 silk nets to incipient sediment motion Key Points: in gravel-bedded streams • Caddisfly silk nets are incorporated into a model of incipient sediment motion Lindsey K. Albertson1, Leonard S. Sklar2, Patricia Pontau3, Michelle Dow1, and Bradley J. Cardinale3 • Silk nets increase critical shear stress in gravel-bedded streams 1 fi Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA, • Species-speci c silk and behaviors 2 3 control the range of grain sizes affected Department of Earth and Climate Sciences, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, California, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA Correspondence to: Abstract Plants and animals affect stream morphodynamics across a range of scales, yet including L. K. Albertson, biological traits of organisms in geomorphic process models remains a fundamental challenge. For [email protected] example, laboratory experiments have shown that silk nets built by caddisfly larvae (Trichoptera: Hydropsychidae) can increase the shear stress required to initiate bed motion by more than a factor of 2. The Citation: contributions of specific biological traits are not well understood, however. Here we develop a theoretical Albertson, L. K., L. S. Sklar, P. Pontau, * M. Dow, and B. J. Cardinale (2014), model for the effects of insect nets on the threshold of sediment motion, τ crit, that accounts for the A mechanistic model linking insect mechanical properties, geometry, and vertical distribution of insect silk, as well as interactions between (Hydropsychidae) silk nets to incipient insect species.
  • The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    The Trichoptera of North Carolina

    Families and genera within Trichoptera in North Carolina Spicipalpia (closed-cocoon makers) Integripalpia (portable-case makers) RHYACOPHILIDAE .................................................60 PHRYGANEIDAE .....................................................78 Rhyacophila (Agrypnia) HYDROPTILIDAE ...................................................62 (Banksiola) Oligostomis (Agraylea) (Phryganea) Dibusa Ptilostomis Hydroptila Leucotrichia BRACHYCENTRIDAE .............................................79 Mayatrichia Brachycentrus Neotrichia Micrasema Ochrotrichia LEPIDOSTOMATIDAE ............................................81 Orthotrichia Lepidostoma Oxyethira (Theliopsyche) Palaeagapetus LIMNEPHILIDAE .....................................................81 Stactobiella (Anabolia) GLOSSOSOMATIDAE ..............................................65 (Frenesia) Agapetus Hydatophylax Culoptila Ironoquia Glossosoma (Limnephilus) Matrioptila Platycentropus Protoptila Pseudostenophylax Pycnopsyche APATANIIDAE ..........................................................85 (fixed-retreat makers) Apatania Annulipalpia (Manophylax) PHILOPOTAMIDAE .................................................67 UENOIDAE .................................................................86 Chimarra Neophylax Dolophilodes GOERIDAE .................................................................87 (Fumanta) Goera (Sisko) (Goerita) Wormaldia LEPTOCERIDAE .......................................................88 PSYCHOMYIIDAE ....................................................68
  • DBR Y W OREGON STATE

    DBR Y W OREGON STATE

    The Distribution and Biology of the A. 15 Oregon Trichoptera PEE .1l(-.", DBR Y w OREGON STATE Technical Bulletin 134 AGRICULTURAL 11 EXPERIMENTI STATION Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon INovember 1976 FOREWORD There are four major groups of insectswhoseimmature stages are almost all aquatic: the caddisflies (Trichoptera), the dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata), the mayflies (Ephemeroptera), and the stoneflies (Plecoptera). These groups are conspicuous and important elements in most freshwater habitats. There are about 7,000 described species of caddisflies known from the world, and about 1,200 of these are found in America north of Mexico. All play a significant ro'e in various aquatic ecosystems, some as carnivores and others as consumers of plant tissues. The latter group of species is an important converter of plant to animal biomass. Both groups provide food for fish, not only in larval but in pupal and adult stages as well. Experienced fishermen have long imitated these larvae and adults with a wide variety of flies and other artificial lures. It is not surprising, then, that the caddisflies have been studied in detail in many parts of the world, and Oregon, with its wide variety of aquatic habitats, is no exception. Any significant accumulation of these insects, including their various develop- mental stages (egg, larva, pupa, adult) requires the combined efforts of many people. Some collect, some describe new species or various life stages, and others concentrate on studying and describing the habits of one or more species. Gradually, a body of information accumulates about a group of insects for a particular region, but this information is often widely scattered and much effort is required to synthesize and collate the knowledge.
  • Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater

    Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater Part 8000 TOXICITY 8010 INTRODUCTION*#(1) 8010 A. General Discussion 1. Uses of Toxicity Tests Toxicity tests are desirable in water quality evaluations because chemical and physical tests alone are not sufficient to assess potential effects on aquatic biota.1-3 For example, the effects of chemical interactions and the influence of complex matrices on toxicity cannot be determined from chemical tests alone. Different species of aquatic organisms are not equally susceptible to the same toxic substances nor are organisms equally susceptible throughout the life cycle. Even previous exposure to toxicants can alter susceptibility. In addition, organisms of the same species can respond differently to the same level of a toxicant from time to time, even when all other variables are held constant. Toxicity tests are useful for a variety of purposes that include determining: (a) suitability of environmental conditions for aquatic life, (b) favorable and unfavorable environmental factors, such as DO, pH, temperature, salinity, or turbidity, (c) effect of environmental factors on waste toxicity, (d) toxicity of wastes to a test species, (e) relative sensitivity of aquatic organisms to an effluent or toxicant, (f) amount and type of waste treatment needed to meet water pollution control requirements, (g) effectiveness of waste treatment methods, (h) permissible effluent discharge rates, and (i) compliance with water quality standards, effluent requirements, and discharge permits. In such regulatory assessments, use toxicity test data in conjunction with receiving-water and site-specific discharge data on volumes, dilution rates, and exposure times and concentrations. 2. Test Procedures There is a need to use correct terminology (see Section 8010B, Terminology), and environmentally relevant test procedures to meet regulatory, legal, and research objectives.3-8 The procedures given below allow measurement of biological responses to known and unknown concentrations of materials in both fresh and saline waters.
  • Trichoptera) from Northern Thailand of the Genera Himalopsyche (Rhyacophilidae), Arctopsyche (Arctopsychidae), Cf

    Trichoptera) from Northern Thailand of the Genera Himalopsyche (Rhyacophilidae), Arctopsyche (Arctopsychidae), Cf

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Braueria Jahr/Year: 2005 Band/Volume: 32 Autor(en)/Author(s): Thamsenanupap Penkhae, Chantaramongkol Porntip, Malicky Hans Artikel/Article: Description of caddis larvae (Trichoptera) from northern Thailand of the genera Himalopsyche (Rhyacophilidae), Arctopsyche (Arctopsychidae), cf. Eoneureclipsis (Psychomyiidae) and Inthanopsyche (Odontoceridae). 7-11 © Hans Malicky/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at BRAUERIA (Lunz am See, Austria) 32:7-11 (2005) Description of the larvae Description of caddis larvae (Trichoptera) from Himalopsyche acharai MALICKY & CHANTARAMONGKOL northern Thailand of the genera Himalopsyche 1989 (Rhyacophilidae), Arctopsyche (Arctopsychidae), cf. The larva is large and stout. The sclerites of the head, pronotum, legs and prolegs are dark brown or black. Eoneureclipsis (Psychomyiidae) and Inthanopsyche The head capsule is relatively flat and has a black stripe along (Odontoceridae). the dorsal ecdysial lines. The pronotum is covered by a large sclerite; the meso- and metathorax have ventral dense tufts of Penkae THAMSENANUPAP, gills on each side. The legs and prolegs are very stout, The Porntip CHANTARAMONGKOL & Hans MALICKY trochantin is long and apically pointed. The ventrolateral edge of the abdomen has fleshy protuberances on each Abstract. Larvae of Himalopsyche acharai, Arctopsyche segment. The 9th abdominal segment has a dorsal sclerite. hynreck, A. variabilis,
  • Composition and Abundance of Periphyton and Aquatic Insects in a Sierra Nevada, California, Stream

    Composition and Abundance of Periphyton and Aquatic Insects in a Sierra Nevada, California, Stream

    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 46 Number 4 Article 2 10-31-1986 Composition and abundance of periphyton and aquatic insects in a Sierra Nevada, California, stream Harry V. Leland U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, California Steven V. Fend U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, California James L. Carter U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, California Albert D. Mahood U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Division, Menlo Park, California Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Leland, Harry V.; Fend, Steven V.; Carter, James L.; and Mahood, Albert D. (1986) "Composition and abundance of periphyton and aquatic insects in a Sierra Nevada, California, stream," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 46 : No. 4 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol46/iss4/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. , COMPOSITION AND ABUNDANCE OF PERIPHYTON AND AQUATIC INSECTS IN A SIERRA NEVADA, CALIFORNIA, STREAM Harry V. Leland', Steven V. Fend\ James L. Carter\ and Albert D. Mahood' Abstract. —The species composition ofperiphyton and benthic insect communities and abundances ofcommon taxa (>0.1% of individuals) were examined during snow-free months in Convict Creek, a permanent snowmelt- and spring-fed stream in the Sierra Nevada of California. The communities were highly diverse. The most abundant taxa in the periphyton were diatoms {Achnanthes minutissitna, Cocconeis placentula lineata, Cymbella microcephala, C.
  • Biological Diversity in Headwater Streams

    Biological Diversity in Headwater Streams

    water Review Biological Diversity in Headwater Streams John S. Richardson Department of Forest and Conservation Sciences, the University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-604-822-6586 Received: 21 January 2019; Accepted: 19 February 2019; Published: 21 February 2019 Abstract: Headwaters, the sources of all stream networks, provide habitats that are unique from other freshwater environments and are used by a specialised subset of aquatic species. The features of headwaters that provide special habitats include predator-free or competitor-free spaces; specific resources (particularly detrital based); and moderate variations in flows, temperature and discharge. Headwaters provide key habitats for all or some life stages for a large number of species across just about all freshwater phyla and divisions. Some features of headwaters, including isolation and small population sizes, have allowed for the evolutionary radiation of many groups of organisms within and beyond those habitats. As small and easily engineered physical spaces, headwaters are easily degraded by streambank development, ditching and even burial. Headwater streams are among the most sensitive of freshwater ecosystems due to their intimate linkage with their catchments and how easily they are impacted. As a unique ecosystem with many specialist species, headwater streams deserve better stewardship. Keywords: cold stenotherms; detritus; ecological function; lotic; refuge; richness; species radiation 1. Introduction Headwater streams exist in all landscapes as source streams but are variously defined, and a search of the word “headwater” will attest to that. Here, I define headwaters as the first perennially flowing streams in a network, i.e., having no permanent tributaries [1].