STATE EXPERT APPMISAL COMTAITTEE -

Hall. 2nd Floor(Down). Panacal Maliqai. Saidapet. Chennai.

Agenda No: 203-01 (File No: 72422019)

Proposed expansion of Residential Building at S.No 65EO/1(p), ,1428t1 &.3819 in T.Nagar & Mylapore Village, Guindy E l{ylapore Taluk, Chennai District by rus. Tamilnadu Stum Clearance Board - For Enyironmental Clearance.

(SrArfN/Mrs/122542 120 19, 26.10.20t9)

The proposal was placed in the t48b SEAC meeting held on 13.03.2020. The project proponent gave detailed presenbtion. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the followlng:

1, The project proponent, M/s. Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board has apptied for Environmental Clearance for the Proposed Expansion of Residential Building at S.No 6580/1(P) in T.Nagar & 3819 Mylapore Vi age, Guindy & Mytapore Taluk, Chennai Distrlct.

2, The project/activity is covered under Category "B2" of Item 8(a) "Building and Construction Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished, the committee instructed the project proponent to furnish the following details: L The Proponent shall furnish the approval from CMWSSB for supply of 539 kLD *2- [4EMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN SEAC TN -!.-> SEAC- TN - r rDz of fresh water for the proposed project. proposed It was to utilize the treated water from sTp of 262 kLD and 202 kLD

from Grey water treatment plant, a total of 463 kLD for Avenue plantation. A commitment letter shall be obtained from the competent Authority for utiliztng the treated water of 463 kLD for Avenue plantation shall be furnished. project The is lo€ated at abutting the Mambalam tank bund canal and Adayar

River is located at 1.06 km from the proposed site. Hence, the proponent sha furnish the deLails on the design of the Storm Water Drainage plan and Flood Management plan considering the 2015 flood in Chennai with a clear layout plan.

4. proponent The informed that there is a proposal to demolish the damaged slum tenements in the proposed land area for phase II and phase IU for the reconstruction. Hence, the details of demolition plan and management of the same along with the permission from the Corpora$on of Greater Chennai may be obtained as per the Construction and Demolition Rules, 2016. Bio-degradable waste of 1874 kg/day will be generated. The committee felt that slnce the quantity is more than 1 ton/day, the proponent shalt provide the Bio-Methanation plant for treatment and disposal of Bio-degradable instead of owc.

5, The Proponent shall provide the Layout plan with dimensions and GpS coordinates for the Green Belt development by providing a minimum of 3m width tree Plantation all around the periphery of the project site, as per the CrcB guidelines.

7. It is noted that they have not obtained the CMDA approval for the existing bullding (Phase -I). The proponent is instructed to obtain the permission from the CMDA for the existing project.

SEAC decided that on receipt of the above details, the proponent would make a re- presentation for further consideration of the proposal. The Project proponent furnished the above said details to SEIM-TN on 09.09.2020.

SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

2 The Proposal was once again placed in 203d SEAC held on 23.02.2021. Based on the proponent documents furnished, the committee instructed the poect proponent to furnish the following details:

1. The Proponent shall furnish the approval from CMWSSB for supply of 539 kLD of fresh water for the proposed project.

2, It was proposed to utillze the treated water from STp of 262 kLD and 202 kLD from Grey water treatment plant, a total of 463 kLD for Avenue plantation. A detail of committee shall be obtained from the competent Authority for utillzing the treated water of463 kLD for Avenue plantation shall be furnished. 3. The project is at close proximity to l4ambalam tank bund canal at l0 m and Adayar River located at 1.06 km. Hence, the proponent shall furntsh the details on the design of the Storm water Management plan and Flood Management plan considering the 2015 flood with a clear layout plan. 4. It is noted that they have not obtained the CI4DA approval for the existing building (Phase -I). The proponent is instructed to obtain the permission from the CMDA for the existing project.

5, A detailed storm water drainage plan wlth layout shall be furnished to drain out the storm water coming from the upstream side without any hindrance by

designing the storm water drainage arrangement including the maln drains and sub-drains to avoid the future flood inundation in the project site. 6. The project proponent shall provide Community Hall, Childrent play-ground as per the norms for the public usage.

On receipt of the above details, the SE'AC decided to direct the proponent to make a re-presentation for the further course of action on the proposal.

Agenda No: 203-02 (File No: 729312019)

,'9 l--_r"._----,>-'

I4EMBER SECREIARY q, sEAc -rN SEAC- TN Proposed Black Granite quarry rease over an extent of 6,23.0ha at s.F.No.1023/3 in Bargur'B' Vill4e, Anthiwr Taluk, Erode District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. O. Ulaganathan - For Enyironmental Clearance.

(sIArrN/MIN/192921 12021, datedi 13.01.2021) The proposal was placed in this 203d SEAC Meeting hetd on 23.OZ.2OZL. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The detaits of the prolect furnished by the proponent are glven in the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the fo owing: 1. The project proponent, Thiru. O, ulaganathan has applied for Environmental Clearance for proposed the Black Granite quarry lease over an enent of 6.23.oha at S.F.No. 1023/3 in Bargu/B,V tage, Anthiyur Talul! Erode District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The projecvactivity is covered under Category ',B1,'of Item 1(a) ,,Mining of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notiflcation, 2006. 3. Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA_TN vide Lr.No.SElAA_ TN/F.No.7293ISEAC tToR-709 t2O2O, Dated: 02.05.2020. 4, Publlc hearing conducted on 19.12.2020 and Minutes was received from TNpCB vide Lr.No.T2rrNpCB/F.176lpNDlpHt2OzO, dated: 05.01.2021. The project 5. proponent submitted EIA report to SEIAA_TN on 13.01.2021. 6, The production for the flrst five years in total quantity of recoverable as Black granite 600/0 should not exceed 36036cu.m for depth of mining is 56m for the mining plan period. Based on the presentation made and the documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the project proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions, in addition to standard conditions stipulated by the MoEF&CC: The project proponent l. shall allocate a separate area for dumping of waste and proper fencing should be in place for the same. 2, The project proponent shall submlt a correct VAO Certificate, since in VAO

MEMBER SECRETARY SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

4 certiflcate it is stated that there is no habitation within 3OOm radius, whereas

when it was checked with Google map, there are around 7 houses lo€ated at a distance of 175m.

The project proponent should install cautionary board at the entry and important locations of the mining site displaylng caution notice to the public about the danger of the entering the mining areas. The project proponent should not carry out mining below the ground water table without the NoC/ permission from the Centrat Ground Water Authority. 5, The proponent shall form the proper benches as per the approved mine plan during the operation of the quarry. 6. Fugitive emission measurements should be carried out during the mining operation and the report on the same may be submitted to SEIAA once in six months.

7. Proponent shall ensure that the Noise level is monitored during mining operation at the poect site and adequate noise level reduction measures undertaken. L The proponent shall erect fencing all around the boundary of the proposed area with gates for entry/exit as per the conditions and shall furnish the photographs/map of the same before obtaining the CTO from TNPCB.

9, Greenbelt needs to be developed ln the periphery of the mines area so that at the closure time the trees would have grown well. 10, Ground water quality monrtoring should be conducted once every six months and the report shall be submitted to TNPCB. 11, After mining is completed, proper leveling shoutd be done by the project proponent & Environmental lvlanagement Plan furnished by the proponent should be strictly followed.

12. The Project proponent shall, after ceasing mining operations, undertake re- grassing the mining area and any other area which may have been disturbed due to their mining activlties and restore the land to a condition that is flt for

MEII4BER SECRETARY SEAC -TN

5 the growth of fodder, flora, fauna etc. 13, Proper barrler to reduce noise level, dust pollution and to hold down any possible fly materiat (debris) should be estabtished by providing greenbelt and/or metal sheets along the boundary of the quarrying site and suitable working methodology to be adopted by considering the wind direction. 14. The operation of the quarry shoutd not affect the agricutture activitjes & water bodies near the project site and a safety distance of 5Om from the water body should be left vacant without any mining activity. 15. Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road. 16. The Project Proponent shafl compry with the mining and other rerevant rures and regulations wherever applicable. 17, The proponent shall develop an adequate greenbelt with native species on the periphery of the mine lease area before the commencement of the mining activity, in consultation with DFO of the concerned districvagriculture. 18, The quarrying activity shafl be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry tease period and the same shall be monltored by the concerned District Authorities. 19, Prior clearance from Forestry & Wild Life including clearance from committee ofthe National Board for Wildlife as applicable shall be obtained before starting the quarrying operation, if the project site attracts the NBWL clearance. 20, To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards posted are to be during the entire period of the mining operation. 21. The mine ptan closure submitted by the project proponent shall be stricfly followed after the lapse of the mine. 22, As per MoEF&CC the Office Memorandum F.No. 22_65/2017_IA.III dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent shall furnish the detaited EMp mentioning all the activities as proposed in the CER and furnish the same before placing the subject to SEIM.

14E14BER SEAC -TN

6 23 The project proponent shall furnish a detailed action plan for the points raised during the public hearing meeting.

24 All the condition imposed by the Director, Geology & Mining, in the mining plan approval letter Rc.No.6748/14144/2019, dated: 15.11.2019 and the preclse area communication letter 1r.No.8565/MME.2/2019-1, dated: 16.09.2019 should be strictly followed.

Agenda No: 203-03 (File No: 8027/2020)

Proposed construction of 1260 EWS Residential tenements at S.F.No. 347pt, 3,Ept & 349pt in ilanali New Town, Edayanchavadi Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thirwallur District by Lt/s. Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board - For Environmental Clearance.

(srArrN/Mrs/18049 L 12020, 27.t0.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203,i SEAC meeting hetd on 23.02.202t. The project proponent gave detailed presentatlon. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parlvesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following:

1, The project proponent, M/s. Tamilnadu Slum Clearance Board has applied for Environmental Clearance for the proposed construction of 1260 EWS Residential tenements at S.F.No. 347pt, 348pt & 349pt in t'lanali New Town, Edayanchavadi Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District. 2. The projecvactivlty is covered under Category "82" of ltem 8(a) "Building and Construction Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. Based on the presentation made and the documents furnished by the poect proponent, the committee instructed the poect proponent to furnish the following details:

1. The project proponent shall submit Structural Stability Certificate from experts from IIT, Anna University or from any other reputed Government Departments

at. A.. NlEMBER SECRFTARY CHAIRMAN 9/ serc-n SEAC- TN 7 / Institutions. 2. The project proponent ,,No shall submit NOC to the effect of Flood Inundation,, from pWD.

3. The prolect proponent ,,in_principle shall submlt approval or commitment lette/'for water supply from the concerned authority. 4. The Project Proponent shall revise the STp design and grey water treatment plant based on the study of the characteristics of Grey & Sewage water to utitize the treated water for recycling and flushing.

5. A detailed storm water dralnage plan with layout shall be fumished to draln out the storm water coming from the upstream side without any hindrance by designing the storm water drainage arrangement incruding the main drains and sub-drains to avoid the future flood inundation in the project site. 5. Rainwater plan harvesting proposed is not in order and poect proponent sha revise the same as per the MoEF &CC / CGWB guidelines. 7. The project proponent shall provide Community Hall, Children,s playground as per the norms for the public usage. On receipt of the above details, the SEAC decided to direct the proponent to make a re-presentation for the further course of action on the proposal.

Agenda No: 203-04 (File No: 7050/2020)

Proposed expanslon of foundry unit from 22OO Tpfi to 28OO Tpit of cast iron rough castirEs in S.F.l.b.47El1, 47U2 at KaniyLr $llee of SuluTalL*, Coimbatore District, Tamilnadu - By lrt/s. V. R. Foundries - Unit - ll - For Terms of Reference.

(srArrN/rND/39821/2019, Dated: 23 lO7 12019) The proposal was placed in 191* SEAC Meeting held on 30.12.2020. The proponent did not turn up for the appraisal meeting. Hence the SEAC decided to defer the

MEIt4BER SECRETARY * SEAC -TN I proposal. Further, the poect proponent shall furnish the reason in writing for not attending the meeting to SETAA/SEAC. proposal The was once again ptaced in 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The proponent has not turned up for the appraisal meeting once again. Hence the SEAC decided to defer the proposal. Further, the project proponent shall furnish the reason for not attending the meetlng to SEIAL/SEAC.

Agenda No: 203-05 (File No: 71922020)

Proposed Lime Kankar lease over an extent of 2.30.0 Ha in S.F.Nos. 33/lA and 33/18 Karuppur (Senapahty) Village, Ariyalur Taluk, Ariyatur District, Tamll Nadu by I4/s. Chettinad Cements Corporation h^. Ltd - For Terms for Reference (shrrN/t4Is/.t4473l2019 Dated: 09/10/2019) The proposal was placed in this 1586 SEAC l{eeting held on 22.06.2020. The project proponent has not turned up for the meeting (Absent). Hence, the Committee decided to defer the proposal.

The proposal was once again ptaced in 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The proponent has not turned up for the appraisal meeting once again. Hence the SEAC decided to defer the proposal. Further, the project proponent shall furnish the reason for not attending the meeting to SEIAA/SEAC.

Agenda No: 203-06 (File No: 769112020)

Proposed Mill Expansion Plan (MEp) with tnstallation of Board Machine, De-Inking

Plant (DIP) to increase the paper board production capactty from 1,2O,OOO TpA to 3,00,000 TPA and expansion of Power Plant from S tvlw to 29 I4W with other connected auxillaries by ITC Limited-pspD, Kovai, at S.F.Nos. 24111, 40911,40912, 409128, 40912C, 40912D, 40912E, 409/2F, 40912c, 4O9l2H, 4}9t2t, 4rOl2B, 41Ol3A, 410138, 4rtlLB, 4ttlrc, 4LU1D, 4L2l1E, 4t2l1F, 41212, 41213, 4r2BD1, 4121302,

MEMBER SECRETARY SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

9 41213D3, 41412A, 41412C, 4t4l2D, 41412E, 41512,415/3A, 415/38, 4Lsl4, 41612A, 418 in Thekkamapatti Village, Mettupalayam Taluk, Coimbatore District, Tamil Nadu- under schedule 5(i) Pulp & Paper Industry Excludlng the manufacturing of Pap€r from rflaste -for Terms of Reference. (SlAfiN^ND/52074 12020, dated: 0s.03.2020) The proposal was placed in 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021.

On Initial dlscusslons, the SEAC noted,

As per EIA notification 2006, and as amended dated 25s June 2014 the actlvity comes under 5(i) pulp and paper industry and general conditions shall also applicable. In that clause, it is categorically mentioned that "Paper monulocturing lrom wostepoper pulp ond ready pulp without deinking, bleoching ond colouring is exempt". The proponent informed the committee that thelr production process involves "de-lnklng activity" and hence the project may not fall under "B" category, and hence shall be appraised at

central level as "A" category poect.

Agenda No: 203-07 (File No: 797112020)

PrAcEed Ror4h stone quarry lear€ orer an extent c,f 1.30.0ha at S.F.l.l6. 20/2(P) e 2112 in T.Nallalam Vlllage, ,iarakkanam Taluk, Villuppuram District, Tamil )ladu by Thiru. V.Narendiran- For Terms of Reference. (SIArrN/MlN/57654/2020, dated: 21.10.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203'd SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the poect furnished by the proponent are given on the website (Parivesh.nic.in).

The SEAC noted the following: 1. The pOect proponent, Thlru. V.Narendiran, has applled for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.30.0ha at

S.F.Nos. 20/2(P) & 21l2 in T.Nallalam Village, Marakkanam Taluk, viluppuram Dlstrict,Tamil Nadu.

14EMBER utr- sac -nr SEAC- TN

10 2. The project/activity is covered under Caiegory,'B1,,of Item 1(a),,Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedute to the EIA Notiftcation, 2006. production 3. The for the five years in total quantity of recoverable as 68o85cu.m of Rough stone & 7963cu.m of Topsoil should not exceed for ultimate depth of mining, which is 21m below ground level.

4, lt was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category. Based presentation on the and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EN4P report:

1. The Prolect Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and iLs impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2, The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 3, The Project Proponent shall furnish the detaits on the number of groundwater pumping and open wetls within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD tn this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

4. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area.

5. The details of surrounding well and the assessment of cumulauve impact on the groundwater due to mtning shall be the part of EIA study

6, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone

MEMBER SECRETARY SEAC .TN

11 from the mines.

7. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos., name of the species, age etc.,) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 8. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum

of MoEF& CC.

9, A Detalled mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 10, A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitations during operation of mlning for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

11. The recommendation for the issue of "Terms of Reference" is subjected to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (lvl.A.No.1 182/2016) and O.A.N0.102/2017 and O.A.No.40al2016 (M.A.No. 75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, lvl.A.No.12l2017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981/2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

12, A detalled study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

13. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees planted with a copy of photos/documents, and be included in the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-0E (File t{o: 797412020) Proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.88.5ha at S.F.No6. 18611, 19Ol2B1 &. 19O|2BZ in Kundiyanthandalam Village, Vembakkam Taluk, Tiruyannarnalai District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. A.Dasarathan- For Terrns of Reference. (sIArrN/MrN/57649/2020, dated: 21.10.2020)

MEI4BEGtrERETARY, ) serc-nr SEAC. TN 12 proposal The was placed in the 203dSEAC Meeting held on Z3.OZ.ZOZL. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh. nic.in).

The SEAC noted the following:

1. The project proponent, Thiru. A.Dasarathan, has apptied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.gg.sha

at S.F.Nos. t8611, t90lZB1 & 190/282 in Kundiyanthandalam Vi age, Vembakkam Taluk, ,Tamil Nadu. 2. The projecvactivity is covered under Category,,B1,,of Item 1(a)',Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence lt is considered under the B1 category. Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following speciflc conditions in addition to the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EI y'EMp report:

1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 47m to 42m considering the environmentnl impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenfly the maximum minable quantities of 460700 cu.m of Rough stone & 46462 cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years. 2, A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3, The Poect Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water bble detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

aI- z> MEMBER uSECRETARY CHAIRMAN v SEAC -TN SEAC- TN 13 4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geotogical study to evatuate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as riveB, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

5. The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater bore wells and open wells withtn 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data ofground water levels from the PWD / TWAD tn this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons,

6. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activifles around the site area. 7. The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study 8. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER actlvities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum

of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted.

12. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitantsduring operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subjected to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.40412016 (M.A.No.

7 58 12016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No. 112212016, M.A.No. 1212017 & M.A. {-g MET4BER SECRETARY CHAIRFlAN * SEAC .TN SEAC- TN

74 No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U 20t6, lvl.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining tease area shall be furnished.

15. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

16. The project proponent shall re-plant all the trees whlch is located in the existing mines.

Agenda No: 203-09 (File No: 7990/202O)

Proposed Common Bio-lledical Waste Treatment plant capacity of IOTPD at S.F.No. '12314 at i,layapakkam Mllqe, tfthLdrcttai Taluk, Tiruyallur District, Tamil lhdu by l,Vs. Greater Chennai Bio trtedical Waste Management private Limited - For Terms of Reference

(stArrN/Ncp/56910/2020 dated: 30.09.2020) proposal The was placed for appraisal in this 198u meeting of SEAC held on 05.02.2021. The detalls of the project furnished by the proponent are available on the website (parivesh. nic.in). SEAC noted the following:

l, The Project Proponent, ty/s. creater Chennai Bio-Medical Waste l,lanagement Private Limited has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Common ptant Bio-Medical Waste Treatment capactty of 10 TpD at S.F.No. 12314 at Nayapakkam Village, Uthukottai Taluk, Tlruvallur District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category,B1, of ltem 7(d)(a) *Common hazardous waste treatment, storage and disposal facilities (TSDFS),,of the Schedule to the EIA No$ficition,2006.

SEAC noted that the Project proponent didn,t attend the today,s meeting (Absent) and no prior communication recelved from the proponent in this regard. Hence the

MEIVIBER SECRETARY ul> sEAc -rN SEAC- TN

15 committee decided to seek SEIAA to obtain and furnish explanation from the proponent for the absence without any intimation to SEAC/SEIAA.

The poect proposal was placed in the 203d meeting of the SEAC hetd on 23.02.202t. Based on the presentation made by the proponent and the documents furnished the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of References (ToR) to SEIAA with Public Hearing. The proponent shall include the details/particulars raised in the following speciflc ToR in the EIA report, in addition to the standard ToR: 1. Establishment of the facility as per Bio Medial Waste Management Rules 2016. 2, Land requirement for the facility including its break up for various purposes, its availability and optimization.

3, Details of proposed layout, clearly demarcating various activities such as securify. 4, Details on collection and transportation of Bio Medical Waste from health care establishments, No. of vehicles and feature of vehicles, etc. 5, Details of the incineration system - a statement on the compliance to the CPCB guidelines for common bio medical waste incinerato6 in respect of waste feed cutore, operating parameters of combustion chambers, flue gas cleaning, ash handling, etc. 6. Details on fuel requirements for incineration. 7, Details on flue gas emissions likely to get discharged through stack and proposed pollutlon control technologies for the same.

L Monitoring proposals for Toxic aas emission and the proposed control measures. 9, Details on residue/ash generation and management. 10. Details on area storage of BMW, in case of maintenance flow of waste of detail action plan shall be part at EIA study. 11, Details ofthe proposed overall safety and health protection measures. 12. Details of the existing access road(s)/walkways to the designed operations in the site and lts layout.

MEMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMA 9> SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

16 13, Land use map based on satellite imagery lncluding location specific sensitivities such as national parks / wildlife sanctuary, villages, industries, etc. 14. Surface water quality of nearby water bodies. 15. Details on proposed groundwater monitoring wells, locations, frequency of monitoring, parameters, etc.

16. Action plan for the greenbelt development in accordance to CPCB published guidelines.

1i. Details on pollution control technologies and online monitoring equipment. 18. Details of the emergency preparedness plan and on-site & off-site disaster management plan.

19. The proponent shall explore the possibility for use of green technology like plasma technology, etc.,

20, The proponent shall conduct Socio-economlc and health survey.

21. A detailed incinerator design needs to be submitted on the likelihood of emisston, possible types of gases coming out of the process and its measures and mitigation. 22, The proponent shallfurnish SOp forthe process operation. 23. The proponent shall conduct a detailed study on water, land and Air quality.

Agenda No:203-10 (File No: 7993/2020)

Propced Roqh sto.E quarry lease o/er an extent d 1.56.0+la at S,F.th6. 306(part-l) in Pannapalli Village, Sholagiri Taluk, f\rishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. V.Venkatachalam- For Terms of Reference. (srArrN/rvlrN/45552/2020, dated: t7.t2.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting hetd on 23.02.202t. The prgect proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furntshed by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in).

The SEAC noted the following:

1. The poect proponent, Thiru. V.Venkabchalam, has applied for Terms of

MEMBER SECRETARY SEAC .TN

17 Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.56.0ha at S.F.No. 306(Part-I) in pannapalti Vi age, Shootagiri Tatuk, Krishnagiri District,Tamil Nadu. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category.'81,, of ltem 1(a) ,.Mining of Minerals Projects" of the S{hedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC declded to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following speciflc conditions in addition to the poinE mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be inctuded in EIA/Et4p report: 1, Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 64m to 52m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenfly the maximum minable quantities of 598460cu.m of Rough stone & 16000cu.m of Topsoil are permitted for mining over five yea6. 2, A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining. 3. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and iis impacts on the wells due to mining activity. 4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed minlng activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rlvers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 5, The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in

SEAC- TN

18 both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall coflect the pWD data of water table level from the / TWAD in this area tn both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

6, The Proponent shall cirry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7. The detalls ofsurroundlng well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

8. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activlty. 10, CER activlties should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Offlce Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

ll. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 12. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitantsduring operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of principal the Hon'ble NGT, Bench, New Delhi in o.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.1O2l2Ou and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.12l20U & M.A. No. 843/2017) and o.A.No.405/2016 and o.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

15, The prolect proponent shall furnish the details of the existing creen belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

L.\L-^,{ c15 CHAIRITlAN _TN \!r,, sEAc SEAC- TN

19 Agenda No: 203-1 'l (File No: E025/2020)

PrA6€d Rough storp & Gravet quarry lease orer an extent of 3.94.5ha at S.F.tb. 1E2/1B, 14Y1, 183128&.1Er',12 in Therkkuilanthakutam Villqe, lGyathar Taluk, Ttr@thukudi District, Tamit tladu h/ Thiru. P.Jahir HussalD For Terms d RefererEe.

(sIArrN/MrN/57885 I 2020, dated: 30. 10. 2020)

The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project

proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.tn). The SEAC noted the following: 1. The project proponent, Thiru. P.Jahir Hussain, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 3.94.5ha at S.F.Nos. 182/18, 183/1, 183/28 & 184/2 in Therkkuitanthakutam Village, Kayathar Taluk, Thoothukudi District,Tamil Nadu. 2. The poecvactivity is covered under Category "B1" of Item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3, The productlon for the five years in total quantity of recoverable as 297975cu.m of Rough stone & 51450cu.m of gravel should not exceed for depth of mining is 23m below ground level.

4. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the Bl category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference OoR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specif,c conditions in addition to the poinB mentioned ln the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects

and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included ln EIA/EMP report; 1, The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table

MEN4 > sEAc-rN SEAC. TN 20 detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2, The Prolect Proponent shallconduct a detailed hydro-geologicatstudytoevaluate the lmpact of proposed mlning activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanG, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

3, The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) atong with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

4. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study due to mining Crushers and other activities around the site area on the Agricultural activities in that area.

5, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

6, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

7. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 8, CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available wlthin the buffer zone as per Omce Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

9. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 10, A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitanb during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

11. The recommendation forthe issueTerms of Reference issubject tothe outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016

MEM rl2z SerC -n SEAC- TN 2l (M.A.No.350i 2016) and O.A. No.2OO/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2OU and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No.

758120L6, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No.843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

12, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

13. The project proponent shall furnish the deta s of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-12 (File No: 81022020) ,,Eollineni Propced co.Etnrtlm cf Residential Corplex Zion,, in S. No, 44312, 44411, ,t00 44412 of Perumbakkam village E 93 to 97, to 102, 1O3l1AZ, 116t19, 1,t7t2A1, 11712A2, 117128, 11812912, 118t2813, 131121, 13114 of Arasankalani village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Kanchipuram District, Tamil Nadu by l,t/s. BSCpL lnfrastructure Limited-For Terms of Reference

(sIArrN/Mrs/58566/2020, dated : 24.tt.2020) The proposal was placed in the 198$ SEAC meeting hetd on 05.02.2021. The detaits of the poect furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following:

l. The project proponent, M/s. BSCPL Infrastructure Limited has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed construction of Residential Complex "8ollineni Zion" in S. No. 44312, 44411, 44412 of Petumbakkam village & 93 to 97, 100

t0 102, 103/1A2, 116118, 1r712A1, 11712 2, 117128, 11812812, 11812813, 131123, 131/4 of Arasankalani village, Sholinganallur Taluk, Kanchipuram District. 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category "B2" of Item 8(b) "Townships and area development Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notiflcation, 2006.

14EMBER SECREIARY CHAIRI"lA 9 SEAC -TN SEAC- TN 22 SEAC noted that the instructions given to the Consultant regarding presentation for ToR are not being followed, while other consultants are scrupulously following the same. The Committee noted that this particular consultant irrespective of the Committee,s advice, not following the suggestions and thus the Committee had to spend more time appraising the pOect he ls presenting. Hence the proponen( Consultant shall make representation in the ensuing meeting furnishing all relevant details.

The proposal was once again placed tn the 2O3d SEAC Meeting hetd on 23.02.2021. project The proponent gave a detailed presentation. Based on the presentation and the documents furnished the SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for grant of Terms of References (ToR) to SEIAA subject to the following additionalToR in the EIA report, in addition to the standard ToR:

1, The proponent shall obtain the approval from the competent authority for the extractlon of Ground water.

2, The contour levels of the proposed site shall be measured and contour map

may be furnished. The Proponent shall furnish the detailed water balance as per the MoEF& CC guidetines.

3, A register, village map with FMB sketch shall be furnished to check the contiguous nature of the site.

4, A detailed storm water plan to drain out the water from site shall be prepared in accordance with the contour levels of the proposed project site considering the flood occurred in the year 2015 and also considering the surrounding development.

5. The layout plan furnished for the greenbelt area earmarked with GpS coordinates by the project proponent on the periphery of the site and the same shall be submitted for CMDA/DTCP approval.

6, The space allotment for solid waste disposal and sewage treatment shall be furnished.

7, Details of Solid Waste management plan shall be prepared as per Solid waste management Rules, 2016 and shall be furnished.

IYEMBER SECRETARY s>,. SEAC -rN

23 8. Details of Rainwater harvesting system proposed should be furnished.

9, The Proponent shall assess and include the Solid waste Generation and Hazardous waste Generation due to the expired chemicals

10, The Proponent shall carry out the MQ & ANL survey in minimum six places & minimum 6 groundwater samples of Surface Water Quality to be analfzed, 11, The Proponent shall carry out the Trafflc Study at minimum two places. 12. The Proponent shall carry out the assessment and modelling study on Fugitive Emission and analyses the impact of the same.

13. The Proponent shall carryout a Cumulafive impact study for soil, water, air etc. and furnish the report.

Agenda No: 203-13 (File No:8110/2020)

Pr@6€d Ror.Bh storE & eavelquarry lease over an extent d 2.51.0iE at S.F.ib6. gE1/1, EE2(P) e E93/4 in Pavithram Vill4e, Prgalur Taluk, f\arur District, Tamil thdu by ivs. Srl Gan6h lfurugan Blue tletals- For Term of Reference. (snrrN/MrN/s8889/2020, dated: 04.12.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh. nic.in). The SE{C noted the following:

1. The project proponent, M/s. Sri Ganesh Murugan Blue Metals, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.51.0ha at s.F.Nos. 881/1, 882(p) & 893/4 in pavithram v tage, Pugalur Taluk, Karur District,Tamil Nadu. 2, The poecvactivity is covered under Category "Bl" of Item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3, It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category.

CHAIRFlAN SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

24 Based on the presentation and documenb furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points

mentioned inthestandardterms of reference forEIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be inctuded in EIA/EMp report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 4Om to 35m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of Rough stone & 3644gcu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over Rve years.

2. A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3. The Poect Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 5. The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

6, The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agrtcultural area due to Minlng, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study Gt.5 M EN4BER SECRETARY CHAIRPIAN SEAC -TN * SEAC- TN 8, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out wtthin a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mtning activity. 10, CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Omce i4emorandum of MoEF& CC.

11, A Detailed mining closure plan forthe proposed project shallbe submitted. 12. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitanE during operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome

ofthe Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2O1O (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.S8O/2016 (lvl.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.N0.404/2016 (tvt.A.No. 75812Ot6, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2Ot6 (M.A.No. 981 12016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

15. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No:203-14 (File tlo: El1112020)

Propoced Rogh storn quarry lease o/er an extent of 1.79.0ha at S.F.i{G. 556/1 & 557 in Panchakshipuram Village, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. .K.Ravikiran- For Terms of Reference. (SIArIN/MIN/53494i2020, dated: 30.05.2020)

14EMBER SECRETARY v SEAC -TN 26 The proposal was placed in the 203,! SEAC Meeting hetd on Z3.OZ.2O2L. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The detaits of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic. in). The SEAC noted the foltowing:

1, The project proponent, Thiru.M.K.Ravikiran, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.79.0ha at S.F.Nos. 556/1 & 557 in panchakshipuram Vi age, Hosur Taluk, Krishnagiri District,Tamil Nadu. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category,'81,, of Item 1(a)..Mining of lYinerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the Bl category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference forEIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EMp report: l, Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 56.5m to 50.5m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenuy the maximum minable quantities of 586523cu.m of Rough stone & 27596cu.m of Topsoil are permitted for mining over five years. 2. A bench height of 7m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

4, The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the

NlEMBER SECRETARY SEAC .TN * SEAC- TN impact of proposed mining activtty on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tank, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

5, The Project Proponent shall furnish the detnils on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levets in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

6, The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study.

8. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9, A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER activities should be cnrried out taking into consideration the requircment of the local habitants available withtn the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 12, A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13, The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No. 75812Ot6, i4.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.1 12212016, M.A.No.12l2017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.s2o of 2016 (M.A.No.

II4EMBER SECRETARY SEAC -TN SEAC. TN

28 98U20t6, pl.A.No.982/2016 & Iyt.A.No.384/2017).

14. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area sha be furnished.

15. The poect proponent shall furnish the detaits of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documenb along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-15 (File No: 61172020) ftopced Ror4h storE & Cravel quarry lease orer an extent cf i.O1.OfE at S.F.I,b. 79l2A(P)in lfleripalalam \fillqe, lladJkkarai Taluk, Coir$atore District, Tamil t{adu by Thiru. K.Shanmugam- For Terms of Reference.

(sIArrN/MIN/58961 12020, datedi 07.t2.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.202t. The prolect proponent gave a detailed presentation. The detaits of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic. in). The SEAC noted the following: 1. The poject proponent, Thiru. K.Shanmugam, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.01.oha at S.F.No. 7912A(p) in !'lyleripalayam Village, Madukkarai Taluk, Coimbatore District,Tamil Nadu. 2. The poecvactivity is covered under Category "B1" of Item 1(a)',Mining of l"linerals Poects" of the Schedule to the EtA Notification, 2006. 3. The production for the flve years in total quantity of recoverable as 62423cu.m of Rough stone & 2520cu.m of gravel should not exceed for depth of mining is 38m below ground level.

4. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the 81 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponen! SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with ot--> ME14BER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN SEAC .TN SEAC- TN

29 Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the stnndard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projecB and details issued by the MoEF& cc to be inctuded in EIA/EMP report: 1, The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells locnted around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 3. The Prolect Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the PWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

4, The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to [4ining, Crushers and other activities around the slte area. 5, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

6. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

7. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age, etc.,) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 8. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Olfce l4emorandum of MoEF& CC.

9. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed poect shall be submitted. 10. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be

MEMBER SECRETARY * SEAC -TN SEAC- TN 30 submitted.

1l. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principat Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.2OOl2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 7s812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. N0.843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.N0.384/2017).

12, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

13, The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documenE along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-16 (File No: El18/2020)

Propoed Roqh stone quarry lease wer an extent of 1.oo.Oha at S.F.tlo6. 15U1(part-2) (Bit-l) in Periyagoundapuram Village, Vazhapadi Taluk, Salem District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.C.Vijayakumar- For Terms of Reference.

(srArrN/MrN/s9009 12020, dated: 08.r2.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203tu SEAC t4eeting held on 23.02.202L. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in).

The SEAC noted the following: 1. The project proponent, Thiru. C.Vijayakumar, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.00.0ha at S.F.Nos. 158/1(Part-2) (Bit-D in Periyagoundapuram Village, Vazhapadi TaluK Salem District,Tamil Nadu. 2, The poect/activity is covered under Category "B1" of Item 1(a) "Mining of N4lnerals Poects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

( .------.\--afoq-Z: \ 14EI'{BER SECRETARY CHAlRMAN g sEAc -rN SEAC- TN

31 3, It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence lt is considered under the B1 category. Based presentation on the and documents furnished by the poect proponent, SEAC decided !o recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference OoR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be inctuded in EIAy'EMp report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 71m to 61m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and follotving the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenfly the maximum minable quantities of 179572cu.m of Rough stone are permitted for mining over Rve years.

2. A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3, The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water tabte detailing the number of wels located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mtning activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

5. The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the pWD data of water table level from the / TWAD in thts area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

6. The Proponent sha carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agriculturat area due to Mining/ Crushers and other activities around the site area. ,,. -_--7( l-j'-- ^-

T4EIqBER SECRETARY -TN \}A SEAC SEAC. TN

32 7, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study 8, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9, A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name ofthe species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10, CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum

of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mlning closure plan forthe proposed project shall be submitted. 12, A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blastlng shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome ofthe Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. N0.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102i2017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (14.A.No. 75812076, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No.

987 I 2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017). 14, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

15. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and llst of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-17 (File No: E12112020)

ME14BER SECRETARY *. sEAc-rN Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of i.OO.Oha at S.F.Nos. io6(part-i)in Palapatti Village, Valappady Taluk, Salem District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.S.Dhanapal_ For Terms of Reference,

(SIArrN/MIN/58994/2020, dated: 08.12.2020) proposal The was ptaced in the 203d SEAC Meeting hetd on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic. in). The SEAC noted the following: 1. The project proponent, Thiru. S.Dhanapal, has applied for Terms of Reference for proposed the Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.00.0ha at S.F.Nos. patapatti 106(part-1) in Viltage, Vatappady Taluk, Satem District, Tamit Nadu. projecvactivity 2, The is covered under Category',Bi,,of Item 1(a),,Mining of Minerals Poects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3, It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it ls considered under the B1 category. Based on the presentation and documents furnlshed by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following spectfic conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non_coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EMp report: The proponent 1. Project shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2. The Project Proponent shall re-plant all the trees with girth more than 2ocm. 'The 3, Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining actvity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. st--b MEMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN -TN * SEAC SEAC- TN

34 4. The Poect Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater

pumping and open wefls wtthin 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

5, The Proponent shall cnrry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 6. The detalls of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

7. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

8, A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activlty. 9. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office l4emorandum of MoEF& CC.

10, A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 11. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitanE during operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shall be submitted.

12. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome ofthe Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 758120L6, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U 20t6, [4.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/20 17). 13, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

14. The poect proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area

ME14BER SECRETARY u.\_- SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

35 earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documenE along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No:203-18 (File No: 8130/2020)

Proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 0.89.5ha at S.F.No. 17l1A1B in velampalayam Viltage, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur Dlstrict, Tamil Nadu by Tmt.B.Radhika- For Terms of Reference. (snrrN/MrN/58946/2020, dated: 07.12.2020) The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in).

The SEAC noted the following: 1. The poect proponent, Tmt.B.Radhika, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 0.89.5ha at S.F.No. lT llAl9 in Velampalayam Village, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu. 2. The projecvactivity is covered under Category "B1" of Item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3, It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is

considered under the B1 category. Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference OoR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects

and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EUy'EMP report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 26m to 21m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the {-s N4EMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN u! sac -m SEAC-'IN

36 maximum minable quantities of 76420cu.m of Rough stone & 6o96cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years.

2, A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining ptan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining. proponent 3, The Project shall furnish the contour map of the water table detalling the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity. The 4. Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

5. The Project Proponent shall furntsh the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table tevel from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons,

6. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

8. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

9. A tree survey study shall be carrled out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER activitles should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Offlce Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

11, A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. cL-5 IYEMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN ,. SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

37 12. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the

surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome ofthe Hon'ble NGT, Principat Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.N0.404/2016 (M.A.No.

75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.N0.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 981/2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shalt be furnished.

15, The poect proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinaies and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documenB along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-19 (File No:8141/2020) ,153/1Al ProPced Ro(.!gh stone & Garelquarry lease oyer an extert cf O,E4.OIE at S. F.ib. in Velampalayam Viltage, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur Distrlct, Tamll Nadu by Thiru.li"lhnakarathinarF For Term of Reference. (ShfIN/MIN/59088/2020, dated: 72.12.2020)

The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC lvleeting hetd on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the proiect furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following: 1. The project proponent, Thiru.M.Kanakarathinam, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone& Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 0.84.0ha at S.F.No. 153/1A1 in Vetampatayam Village, pa adam Taluk,

-- -./

MEMBER SECRETARY CHAIR14AN Y> SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

38 llruppur District,Tamil Nadu. 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category',B1,, of Item 1(a)..Mining of t'linerals Projects" of the S,chedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3. The production for the flve years in tot3l quantity of recoverable as 53o95cu.m of Rough stone & 10626cu.m of gravet should not exceed for depth of mining is 17m below ground level.

4. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following speciflc conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIly'EMp report: 1. The Project Proponent shatl furntsh the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its lmpacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2, The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activlty, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. Iocated nearby by the proposed mining area. 3, The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the PWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. 4. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agrlcultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 5. The detalls of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

NlEMBERAz: SECRFTARY \1, SEAC -rN SEAC- TN

39 6. The Socio-economic studies shoutd be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines. 7. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease apptied area and its management during mining activity. 8. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

A Detailed 9. mlning closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 10. A detail report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitanb during operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shall be submitted.

11. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome ofthe Hon'ble principal NGT, Bench, New Detht in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.2O0/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.1O212017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, tvl.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No.843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 981120L6, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

12, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished. 13, The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GpS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EtA Report.

Agenda No: 203-20 (File No: E1.14l2020) ftAo6€d Ror€h stone quarry lease o/er an extent d [email protected] at S.F.tb. ,l/4(part_39) in Anandalai Village, walajah Taluk, Vellore Distrlct, Tamil Nadu by lrt/s. Blue Rock Crusher- For Terms of Reference. (sIArrN/MIN/58630/2020, dated: 26.t2.2020)

MEMBER SECRETARY stac -nr -J-=2=CHAIRMAN l$- SEAC- TN

40 The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.202L. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh. nic.in). The SEAC noted the fo owtng: 1. The project proponent, M/s. Blue Rock Crusher, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone& Gravel quarry lease over an extent 0f 1.00.0ha at S.F.No. 1/4(part-39) in Anandalat Vi age, Walajah Taluk, Vellore District,Tamil Nadu. 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category',B1,, of Item 1(a)..Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EtA Notiftcation, 2006.

3. lt was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EMP report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from glm to 6lm considering the environmenbl impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenuy the maximum minable quantities of 312175cu.m of Rough stone & 11332cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mlning over flve years.

2. A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological reglme of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3, The Project Proponent shatl study the impact due to mining on the water storage in the tank located on the downstream side of the mountain. 4. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table ct.-> 14EI4BER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN SEAC -TN SEAC- TN * 41 detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity. lhe Project 5, Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mintng area. The 6, Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open we s within 1 km (radius) along with the water tevets in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the dala pWD of water table level from the / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The 7. Proponent shall carry out the Cumulafive impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 8. The details of surrounding well and the cumulafive impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study 9, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines. 10. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease apptied area and iE management during mining activity. 11. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available withtn the buffer zone as per Omce Flemorandum of MoEF& CC.

12. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submltted. 13. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

14. The recommendaton for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of principal the Hon'ble NGT, Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.tg6 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and o.A. No.2OO/2016 and o.A.No.580/2016 42-'- NlET'1BER SECRETARY CHAIRFlAN .TN v SEAC SEAC- TN 42 (M.A.No.1 182/2016) and o.A.No.102/2017 and o.A.No.4o4l2016 (M.A.No.

75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 8a3/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

15, A detailed study of the lithotogy of the mining lease area shall be furnished. project 15, The proponent shall furnish the detrils of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GpS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-21 (File No:8153/2020)

ProP6ed Roqh sto.E & Gavel qr.rarry lease orer an extent d 1.95.5ha at S.F.lb. 57qp) palayar & 57'l(P) in Tharwai Village, ottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District, Tam t{adu by l'^r's. Sri Durgambika Blue ,ietals- For Terms of Reference.

(snrrN/MrN/59328 12020, datedt 22.12.2020)

The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC tyeeting held on 23.OZ.ZOZL. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the followtng:

1, The project proponent, M/s. Sri Durgamblka Blue Metals, has applied for Terms

of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.95.5ha at S.F.No. 570(p) & 571(p) in Tharuvai Viflage, palayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District,Tamil Nadu. 2. The project/activity is covered under Category,,B1,,of Item 1(a)',Mining of Minerals Projects" of the g{hedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3, lt was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with

MEI.4BER vSEAC -TN 43 Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addltion to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects

and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA,/EMP report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 42m to 37m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenfly the maximum minable quantities of 281575cu.m of Rough stone, 14620cu.m of weathered rock formation & 15136cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years,

2, A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as tvell as for safe mining.

3. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located

nearby by the proposed mining area. 5. The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater

pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the PWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. 6, The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7. The details ofsurrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study 8. The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone rt(,r- sL.-+= I,IEIYBER SECRETARY CHAIRT4AN y' SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

44 from the mines.

9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER activities should be carried out taking into conslderation the requirement of the local habitanB available within the buffer zone as per Offlce Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shalt be submitted. 12. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habltanE during operation of mining fordrilling and blasting shaI be submitted.

13, The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.N0.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.404/2016 (M.A.No. 7s812076, M.A.No.920/2016, tv.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 8a3/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U 2016, 14.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14, A detailed study of the lithology of the mining lease area shall be furnished.

15. The poect proponent shall furnish the details of the exlsting Green belt area

earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documenB along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-22 (File No: El70l2O20) Proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.45.20ha at S.F.No. 824t2, EZ5|?A, 825t2B, 82611(Pl, 826t2(Pl, 84U2(Pl, 843, 8l5t1[ &.84sl24(P) in Tharuvai Vlllage, Palayamkottai Tatuk, Tirunelveli Distrlct, Tamil Nadu by Thiru.K.Selvaraj- For Terms of Reference.

(smrrN/MrN/s9385 12020, dated: 24.t2.2020) cL-2' REIARY CHAIRMAN $) sEAc -rN SEAC. TN 45 The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC tleeting held on Z3.OZ.2O2|. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the proiect furnished by the proponent are given on the webslte (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the fo owing:

1, The project proponent, Thlru.K.Selvaraj, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 4.45.20ha at S.F.No. 824/2, 82sl2A, 825128, 8z6lr(p), B26lZ(p), B4zta(p), 843, g4slLA & 845/2A(P) in Tharuvai Village, patayamkottai Taluk, Tirunelveli District Tamit Nadu. ,.Mining 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Gtegory "81" of Item 1(a) of Minerals Projects" of the S'chedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3, It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence lt is considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following speclfic conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in ELA/EMP report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 43m to 3gm considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequenfly the maximum minable quantities of 810165cu.m of Rough stone,35342cu.m of weathered rock formation & 73582cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five yeaB.

2. A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeotogical regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mining.

3. The Prolect Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table cL-2, MEMBER SECRETARY- CHAIRMAN -TN *. SEAC SEAC. TN

46 detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

4, The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 5. The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the PWD / TWAD in this area both for monsoon and non-monsoon seasons.

6. The Proponent shall cirry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7. The details of surounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study 8, The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines. 9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity.

10, CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum

of l4oEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed poect shall be submitted.

12. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome of the Hon'ble NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi ln O.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016 ct.-> I',lEMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN .$I,' SEAC -TN SEAC- TN 47 (M.A.No.1 182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.4oal2016 (M.A.No. 75812076, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.t212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.5ZO of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U 2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

14. A detailed study of the lithology of the mining tease area shall be furnished. 15. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-23 (Flle No: 8'175/2020)

Propced Roqh stone quarry lease o/er an extent cf 1.q).OtE at S.F.ib. i/4(part-36) in Anandalai Village, Walajah Taluk, Vellore District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. A.lrlaria William- For Terms of Reference. (snrIN/MIN/58586/2020, dated: 25.r1.2020) proposal The was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following:

1. The project proponent, Thiru. A.Maria William, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone quarry lease over an extent of 1.00.0ha at S.F.No. 1/4(paft-36) in Anandatai Vifiage, Walajah Taluk, Ve ore District,Tamil Nadu.

2. The project/activity is covered under Category,.B1,, of Item 1(a).'Mining of lvlinerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is considered under the B1 category. Based on the presentntion and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend proposal the for the grant of Terms of Reference CfoR) with

IYE[4BER SECRETARY I SEAC -TN 48 Public Hearing, subject to the followlng specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects

and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EMP report: 1. Restricting the maximum depth of mining from 51m to 46m considering the environmental impacts due to the minlng, safety of the working peBonnel and following the principle of the sustainable mining and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 345010cu.m of Rough stone & 11248cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years. 2, A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mlning. 3, The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detaillng the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity. 4. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located

nearby by the proposed mining area. 5, The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the data of water table level from the PWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons, 6, The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other actlvities around the site area. 7. The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study L The Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km butfer zone from the mines.

cL. Z-- 14 E14BER CHAIRMAN u,,SEAC-TN SEAC- TN

49 9, A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants avallable within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 12. A detair report on the safety and hearth aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitanB during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13, The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome ofthe Hon'bte NGT, principal Bench, New Delhi in O.A No.1B6 of 2016 (M.A. No.350/2016) and o.A. No.2OOl2016 and o.A.No.580/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.102/2017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 75812076, M.A.N0.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & [4.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.4O5l2016 and O.A.No.520 of 2016 (M.A.No. 98U 2076, M.A.N0.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017). 14, A detailed study of the lithotogy of the mining lease area shall be furnished. 15. The project proponent shafl furnish the detairs of the exrsting Green bert area earmarked with GpS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-24 (File No: El7912020) Proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of O.90.25ha at S.F.No. 17612, 17613(Pl, 17611 1(p) in ,iarapparai Vi[age, Tiruchengode Tatuk, Namakkat District, Tamil ttadu by Thiru. itfuishmrF For TerrB of Referefte. (SIArIN/MIN/59394/2020, dated : 24.12.2020)

c!- N1EMBER SECRETARY > CHAIRMAN sEAc -rN 9'- SEAC- IN

50 The proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC Meeting held on 23.02.2021. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic. in).

The SEAC noted the following:

1. The poect proponent, Thiru. M.Krishnan, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 0.90.25ha at S.F.No. 17612, r7613(P), 776lrI(P) in Marapparai Village, Tlruchengode Taluk, Namakkal District Tamil Nadu. 2. The projecvactlvity is covered under Category "B1" of Item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Poects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is

considered under the B1 category.

Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SE'AC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the following specific conditions in addltion to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal minlng projects

and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be included in EIA/EMP report: 1, Restrictlng the maximum depth of mining from 37m to 32m considering the environmental impacts due to the mining, safety of the working personnel and following the principle of the sustainable mlnlng and consequently the maximum minable quantities of 106675cu.m of Rough stone & 3102cu.m of Gravel are permitted for mining over five years. 2. A bench height of 5m needs to be maintained as per the approved mining plan considering the hydrogeological regime of the surrounding area as well as for safe mlning. 3. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity. at CHAIRM 9" SEAC -TN SEAC- TN 51 The 4. Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area.

5, The Project Proponent shall furnish the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levets in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shall collect the pWD data of water table level from the / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The 6. Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 7, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study The 8, Socio-economic studies should be carried out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines. 9. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the species, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 10. CER activities should be carried out taking into consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Omce Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

11. A Detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted. 12. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workers and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mining for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

13, The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject tothe outcome of Hon'ble principat the NGT, Bench, New Delhi in O.A N0.186 of 2016 (M.A.N0.350/2016) and o.A. No.20o/2016 and o.A.No.580/2016 (lvl.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.1O2l20t7 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A.

,^{. E= CHAIRMAN senc -nt g!- SEAC- TN

52 No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and O.A.No.52O of 2O1G (M.A.No. 981/2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.38al2017).

14. A detalled study of the lithology of the mining lease area sha be furnished. 15. The project proponent shall furnish the details of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are planted with a copy of photos/documents along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-25 (File No: El8412020)

Propo6ed Roqh stone & Gavel quarry lease o/er an extent of 1.21.5ha at S.F.l.b. 5U1 in Velampalayam Vlllage, Palladam Taluk, Tiruppur District, Tamil Nadu by Thiru. P.Venkatachalam- For Terms of Reference. (SIAfrN/PllN/58080/2020, dated: 04.11.2020)

The proposal was placed in the 203,! SEAC Meeting held on 23.O2.ZOZL. The project proponent gave a detailed presentation. The detalls of the project furnished by the proponent are given on the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following: t, The project proponent, Thiru. P.Venkatachalam, has applied for Terms of Reference for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 1.21.5ha at S.F.No. 58/1 in Velampalayam Village, Palladam Taluk, Ttruppur District,Tamil Nadu. 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category "81" of Item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006. 3. The production for the five years in total quantlty of recoverable as 104520cu.m of Rough stone & 2508cu.m of gravel should not exceed for depth of mining is 42m below ground level. 4. It was noted that the total area in the cluster exceeds 5 ha and hence it is consldered under the Bl category.

MEItlBER SECRETARY .TATSEAC -TN Based on the presentation and documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the proposal for the grant of Terms of Reference (ToR) with Public Hearing, subject to the fottowing specific conditions in addition to the points mentioned in the standard terms of reference for EIA study for non-coal mining projects and details issued by the MoEF& CC to be inctuded in EIA/EMP report: 1. The Project Proponent shall furnish the contour map of the water table detailing the number of wells located around the site and its impacts on the wells due to mining activity.

2. The Project Proponent shall conduct the hydro-geological study to evaluate the impact of proposed mining activity on the groundwater table, agriculture activity, and water bodies such as rivers, tanks, canals, ponds etc. located nearby by the proposed mining area. 3. The Project Proponent shall furnlsh the details on the number of groundwater pumping and open wells within 1 km (radius) along with the water levels in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons. The proponent also shalt collect the data of water table level from the pWD / TWAD in this area in both monsoon and non-monsoon seasons,

4. The Proponent shall carry out the Cumulative impact study on the Agricultural area due to Mining, Crushers and other activities around the site area. 5, The details of surrounding well and the cumulative impact on the groundwater shall be part of EIA study

6, The Socio-economic studies should be carrled out within a 10 km buffer zone from the mines.

7. A tree survey study shall be carried out (nos. name of the spectes, age) in the mining lease applied area and its management during mining activity. 8. CER activitles should be carried out taking lnto consideration the requirement of the local habitants available within the buffer zone as per Office Memorandum of MoEF& CC.

9. A detailed mining closure plan for the proposed project shall be submitted.

. MEI.4BER SECRETARY U*,, Seli.:nr SEAC- TN

54 10. A detailed report on the safety and health aspects of the workeB and for the surrounding habitants during operation of mlning for drilling and blasting shall be submitted.

11. The recommendation for the issue Terms of Reference is subject to the outcome principat ofthe Hon'bte NGT, Bench, New Delhi in o.A No.186 of 2016 (M.A.No.350/2016) and O.A. No.200/2016 and O.A.No.s80/2016 (M.A.No.1182/2016) and O.A.No.1O2l2017 and O.A.No.4O4l2016 (M.A.No. 758120t6, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, M.A.No.1212017 & M.A. No. 843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2016 and o.A.No.s2o of 2016 (M.A.No. 981/2016, M.A.No.982/2016 & M.A.No.384/2017).

12. A detailed study of the tithology of the mining lease area shalt be furnished.

13. The poect proponent shall furnish the delails of the existing Green belt area earmarked with GPS coordinates and list of trees are ptanted with a copy of photos/documenb along with the EIA Report.

Agenda No: 203-TA.01 (File No: 717712019)

Proposed Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.24.5ha at S.F.No.1O15/1A, ,t015t21, 1015118, 10'l5l1C, 10151?,', 1015t28, 1O15t3A & 1015/38 in Bargur Village, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District, Tamil Nadu by M/s.GTp Granites Limited - For Environmental Clearance.

(smrrN/lrrN/192853 12021, datedt 13.01.2021) The proposal was placed in this 203dSEAC Meeting hetd on 23.OZ.2OZ!. The project proponent gave detailed presentation. The details of the project furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parivesh.nic.in). The SEAC noted the following: L The project proponent, M/s.GTp Granites Limited has applied for Environmental Clearance for the proposed Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.24.5ha at s.F.No.1015/1A, 1015/18, 1015/1C, t01512A, t0t5tza,

55 1015/2C, 1015/3A & 1015/38 in Bargur Vi[age, Anthiyur TatuK Erode District, Tamil Nadu. ,'B1,,of ,,t4ining 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category Item 1(a) of Mineral Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3. Terms of Reference issued by SEIAA-TN vide LT.No.SEIAA_ TN/F.No.7177ISEAC lToR-68a 12020, Dated: 31.01.2020. 4, Public hearing conducted on 19.12.2020 and Minutes was received from TNrcB vide Lr.No.T2rINPCB/F.176lpNDlpHl2o2o, dated: 05.01.2021. 5. The project proponent submitted EtA report to SEIAA-TN on 13.01.2021. 6, The production schedule for the years 2019-20 to 2023-24 states that the total quantity of recoverable Black Granite 150/0 should not exceed 39g6 cu.m for depth of mining is 24m for the scheme of mintng plan period. Based on the presentation made and the documents furnished by the project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the poect proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions, in addition to standard conditions stipulated by the MoEF&cc:

1. The project proponent shall allo€ate a separate area for waste dumping and proper fencing shoutd be maintained for the same. 2, The project proponent should install cautionary board at the entry and important location of the mining site displaying caution notice to the public about the danger of the entering the mining areas. 3. The project proponent should not carry out mining below the ground water table without the NoC/ permission from the Central ground water Authority. 4. The proponent shall form the proper benches during the operation of quarry. 5. Fugitive emission measurements should be carried out during the mining operation and the report on the same may be submitted to SEIM once in six months.

6. Proponent shall ensure that the Noise level is monitored during mining operation at the poect site and adequate noise level reducuon measures at -+ MEMBER SECRETARY CHAIRMAN ,-$- selc -rr SEAC- TN

56 undertaken.

7. The proponent shall erect fencing all around the boundary of the proposed area with gates for entry/exit as per the conditions and shall furnish the photographs/map of the same before obtaining the CTO from TNPCB. Greenbelt needs to be developed in the periphery of the mines area so that at the closure time the trees would have grown well. 9 Ground water quality monitoring should be conducted once every six months and the report shall be submitted to TNPCB. 10 After mining is completed, proper leveling should be done by the project proponent & Environmental Management Plan furnished by the proponent should be strictly followed.

11 The Project proponent shall, after ceasing mining operations, undertake re- grassing the mining area and any other area which may have been disturbed due to their mining activities and restore the land to a condition that is fit for the growth of fodder, flora, fauna etc.

12. Proper barrier to reduce noise level, dust pollution and to hold down any posslble fly material (debris) should be established by providing greenbelt and/or metal sheets along the boundary of the quarrying site and suitable working methodology to be adopted by considering the wind direction.

13, The operation of the quarry should not a,fect the agriculture activities & water bodies near the project slte and a 50m width from water body is left vacant without any activity.

14, Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.

15, The Project Proponent shall comply with the minlng and other relevant rules and regulations wherever applicable.

16. The proponent shall develop an adequate greenbelt with native species on the periphery of the mine lease area before the commencement of the mining activity, in consultation with DFO of the concerned district/agriculture. ["

MET4BER SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

5-7 17. The quarrying acfivity shalt be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the

Mining plan is quarried even before the expiry of the quarry lease period and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities.

18. Prior clearance from Forestry & Wild Life including clearance from committee ofthe National Board for Wildlife as applicable shall be obtained before sbrting the quarrying operation, lf the poect site attracts the NBWL clearance.

19. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be posted during the entire period of the mining operation. 20. The mine closure plan submitted by the pOect proponent shalt be stricfly followed after the lapse of the mine.

21, As per the i4oEF&CC Office Memorandum F.No. 22-6S12OL7-!A.III dated:

30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent sha furnish the detailed ENlp mentioning all the activibes as proposed in the CER and furnish the same before placing the subject to SEIAA.

22. The project proponent shall furnish a detailed action plan for the points raised during the public hearing meeting.

23, All the conditions imposed by the Director, Geology & Mining, in the mining plan approvat tetter Rc. No.9045/t4 M4l2018, dated: 30.07.2019 sshoutd be strictly followed.

Agenda No. 203-TA-02

(File.No.8338/2021 )

Proposed Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.1E.Oha at S.F.No. 1O9g/1,

109911A, 1099118, 1O99lA, 1O99t28, iio2(part) & 1103/1(part) in Burgur Vi age, Anthiyur Taluk, Erode District, Tamil Nadu by rus. Ashok Granites Limited - for EnYironment Clearance. (shrnl/MtN/19E265/2O21, dated: 15,O2.2O21)

C{---+=/^ MEMBER SECREIARY CHAIRMAN .tD"' seac -nt SEAC- TN

58 The poect proposalwas placed in the 203d SEAC meeting on 23.02.2021. The pOect proponent made detailed presentation. The details of the poect proposal furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parivesh.nic.in). SEAC noted the following: 1, The project proponent, M/s. Ashok Granites Limited has applied for Environmental Clearance for the proposed Black Granite quarry lease over an extent of 3.18.0ha at s.F.No. 1098/1, 1099/1A, 1099178, r09912A, t099128,

1102(Part) & 1103/1(part) in Burgur Village, Anthiyur Tatuk, Erode District, Tamit Nadu. 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category "82" of item 1(a) "Mining of Minerals Projects" ofthe Schedule to the EIA Notification, 2006.

3, The production for the flve years in total quantlty of recoverable as Black granite 15% should not exceed 3017cu.m for ultimate depth of mining is 20m for the mining plan period. Based on the presentation made and the documents furnished by the Project proponent, SEAC decided to recommend the project proposal for grant of Environmental Clearance subject to the following conditions, in additlon to standard

conditions stipulated by the MoEF & CC: 1. Fugitive emission measuremenE should be carried out during the mining operation and the report on the same may be submitted to SEIM once in six months. 2. Proponent shall ensure that the Noise level is monitored during mining operation at the project site and adequate noise level reduction measures undertaken. 3, The proponent shall erect fencing all around the boundary of the proposed area with gates for entry/exit as per the conditions and shall furnish the photographs/map showing the same before obtaining the CTO from TNrcB. 4. Greenbelt needs to be developed in the periphery of the mines area so that at the closure time the trees would have grown well. --.i--7= MEN,lBER CHAIRMAN 9,- sEAc -rN SEAC- TN 59 5, Ground water quality monitorlng should be conducted once every six months and the report should be submitted to TNPCB. 6. After mining is completed, proper leveling should be done by the project proponent & Environmental Management Plan furnlshed by the proponent should be strictly followed.

7, The Project proponent shall, after ceasing mining operations, undertake re- grassing the minlng area and any other area which may have been disturbed due to their mining activities and restore the land to a condltion that is fit for the groMh of fodder, flora, fauna etc. L Proper barrier to reduce noise level, dust pollution and to hold down any possible fly material (debris) should be established by providing greenbelt and/or metal sheets along the boundary of the quarrying site and suitable working methodology to be adopted by considering the wind direction. 9. The operation of the quarry should not affect the agriculture activities & water bodies near the poect site and a 50m width from water body is left vacant wlthout any activity. 10, Transportation of the quarried materials shall not cause any hindrance to the Village people/Existing Village road.

U, The Project Proponent shall comply with the minlng and other relevant rules and regulations wherever applicable.

12, The proponent shall develop an adequate greenbelt with native spectes on the periphery of the mine lease area before the commencement of the mining activity, in consulbtion with DFO of the concerned district/agriculture. 13, The quarrying activity shall be stopped if the entire quantity indicated in the Mining plan is quarrled even before the expiry of the quarry lease pertod and the same shall be monitored by the District Authorities.

14. The recommendation for the issue of environmental clearance is subject to the outcome of the Hontle NGT, Principal Bench, New Delhi in O.ANo.IB6 of 2016 (M.A.No.3s0/2016) and O.A.No.200/2016 and O.A.No.580/2016

SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

60 (lvl.A.No. 1 182/2016) and 0.A.N0.102/2017 and O.A.N0.404/2016 (M.A.No. 75812016, M.A.No.920/2016, M.A.No.112212016, Nl.A.No.1212017 & M.4.No.843/2017) and O.A.No.405/2015 and O.A.No.52O of 2016(M.A.No.981/2016, 14.A.No.982/20I6 & M.A.N0.384/20u). 15, Prior clearance from Forestry & Wld Life including clearance from committee of the National Board for Wildlife as appticable shall be obtained before starting the quarrying operation, if the project site attracts the NBWL ctearance. 16. To ensure safety measures along the boundary of the quarry site, security guards are to be posted during the entire period of the mining operation. 17. The mine closure plan submitted by the project proponent shall be stricuy followed after the lapse of the mine. 18. As per the MoEF&CC Office Memorandum F.No. 22-65/2017-IA.III dated: 30.09.2020 and 20.10.2020 the proponent sha furnish the detaited EMp mentioning all the activities as proposed in the CER and furnish the same before placlng the subject to SEIAA. 19, All the condition imposed by the Director, Geology & l"lining, in the mining plan approval letter Rc.No.6818/MM412020, da\e 03.02.2021 and the precise area communication Letter No.1064UMME.2/2020-1, dated: 05.01.2021 should be strictly followed.

ASenda No. 203-TA-03 (File.No.817712020)

Proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.13.0ha at S,F.No. 19311A, 2A1, 1B & 1C in Kilkolathur Vittage, Che).yar Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu by lL/s. GLITZ - for Environment Clearance.

(Sl,Arnl/ AlN/1 89143/2020, dated: 21.12.2020\

The project proposalwas placed in the 203d SEAC meeting on 23.02.2021. The project proponent made detailed presentation. The details of the project proposal furnished by the proponent are given in the website (parivesh.nic.in). cj--l>/- ME14BER CHAIRIYAN \r,\,,,,sEAC -TN SEAC- TN SEAC noted the following:

1, The project proponent, l'4/s. GLITZ has applied for Environmental Clearance for the proposed Rough stone & Gravel quarry lease over an extent of 2.13.0ha at S.F.No. 193/1A, 2A1, 1B & 1C in Kitkotathur Vi age, Tatuk, nruvannamalai District, Tamil Nadu. ,,Mining 2, The projecvactivity is covered under Category',82,, of item 1(a) of Minerals Projects" of the Schedule to the EIA Notif,cation, 2006.

Based on the initial discussions, the commlttee noted that the land documents are not in the name of the company nor on the name of the proprietor and hence directed the proponent to submit the proper documenb. 0n submission of the same, the committee would consider it for appraisal.

Agenda No. 203-TA-04 (File.No.7746l2020)

Amendment ln the Environrnental Clearance for the quarrying of Sand over an extent of 4.50.0 ha in South Vellaru River at S.F.Nos. 73(p) & i34(p), panavayal village, Taluk, Pudukottai District by Execufive Engineer, lrtining & Monitoring ^lanamelkudi Division, PWD/WRD, Trichy.

(stAflN/MrN/196483 I 2021,04.02.2021)

The Environmental Clearance was accorded vide Lr. No.SEIAA-TN/F.No. 7746lECtt(a)l 448612020, dated: 12.01.2021 to The Executive Engineer, PWD/WRD, Mining and Monitoring Division, Trichy, for the proposed Sand Quarry over an Extent of 4.50.0 Ha at S.F.Nos. 73(P) & 134(p) in panavayal vi age, Manametkudi Tatul! pudukottai District, Tamil Nadu subject to the condttion that',This Environmentat Clearance is granted to Mining of Sand Quarry for the production quanflty of 426o6cu.m of Sand and 28417 cu.m of Shoals in South Vellar River for the period of 1 year from the date of execution of the l4ining Lease period.,,

-4 \=L-__z- 9., MEMBER SECREIARY -l=-+CHAIRMAN .TN v SEAC SEAC- TN 62 Now the proponent vide letter received dated 03.02.2021 has requested for the amendment in the Environmental Clearance for the proposed sand quarry situated at panavayat S.F.Nos. 73(P) & 134(P) in vilage, tr4anametkudi Tatuk, pudukottai District, Tamil Nadu over an extent of 4.50.0 Ha and stated as follows;

l. The method of mining is mentioned as Manuat-Bullock cort in poge-8, S.No.32 of EC conditions ond other relevont pages. tt is mentioned os ,,fil,echanised Quorry Using Excavator ond Tippers', in the approved ttlining plan, EC reports &, PPT.

2. The Proponent hos requested to moke necessory alteration.

The subject was placed before the 424s Authority meeting held on 12.02.2021. The authority decided to forward the unit's request to SEAC for further consideration of the amendment in the EC conditions issued. The project proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC meeUng on 23.02.2021. Aftet detailed discussion, the Committee verified the documents and accepted the proponent request letter for method of minlng as..Mechanized Quarry Using Excavator and l-ippers instead of Manual-Bullock cad" and all other conditions stipulated EC dated 72.01.2027 remain unaltered.

Agenda No. 203-TA-05 (File.No.782412020)

AIIEMrIEnt in the EnvironnEntal Clearance for the quarryirE of Sand o/er an extent of 4.95.0 ha at S.F.No. 16(P), 17(P) & 18(P) in K.Veppangutam Viltage, lGdatai Taluk, Ramanathapuram District by The Executiye Engineer, PWD/WRD Department.

The Environmental Clearance was accorded vide Lr. No.SEIAA-TN/F.No. 782alEClt(a)l 449912020, daled: 25.01.202L to The Executive Engineer, PWDA/VRD department, for the proposed Sand Quarry over an Extent of 4.95.0 ha at S.F.No. 16(P), 17(P) & 18(P) in K.Veppangulam Village, Kadalai Talul( Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu

N4EMBER o)r/SEAC -TN SEAC- TN

63 subject to the condition that "This Environmental Clearance is granted to Mining of

Sand Quarry for the production quantity of 146037cu.m of Sand & 24750cu.m of Silt

in Malattaru River for the period of 1 Year from the date of execution of the l.4ining Lease period."

Now the proponent vide letter received dated 04.02.2021 has requested for the amendment in the Environmental Clearance for the proposed sand quarry sltuated at S.F.No. 16(P), 17(P) & 18(P) in K.Veppangutam Vi age, Kadatai Tatuk,

Ramanathapuram District, Tamil Nadu over an extent of 4.95.0 ha and stated as follows;

1. The method of mining is mentioned os Monuol-Bullock cart in poge-i, S.No.32 ol EC conditions and other relevont poges. lt is mentioned os,,Mechanised

Quorry Using Excavotor ond Tippers" in the opproved ltining plon, EC reports & PPT.

2. The Proponent has requested to moke necessory olterction. The project proposal was placed in the 203d SEAC meeting on 23.02.2021. After detailed discussion, the Committee verified the documents and accepted the proponent request letter for method of mining as',Mechanlzed euarry Ustng Excavator and Tippers instead of lv|anuaFBullock carf, and all other conditions stipulated EC dated 12.01.2021 remain unaltered.

Finally, the meeting ended with thanks to the Chairman and membeB at Og:15 p.t4.

MEMBER SECRETARY $,, serc -nr SEAC'TN 64