(A) Mcgarry Prelims

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(A) Mcgarry Prelims Northern Ireland and the Divided World The Northern Ireland Conflict and the Good Friday Agreement in Comparative Perspective Edited by JOHN MCGARRY 1 CONTENTS List of Figures xi List of Tables xii List of Abbreviations xiii List of Contributors xv 1. Introduction: The Comparable Northern Ireland John McGarry 1 Part I. General and Theoretical Perspectives 2. Northern Ireland: Consociation or Social Transformation? Rupert Taylor 36 3. Comparative Political Science and the British–Irish Agreement Brendan O’Leary 53 4. The Northern Ireland Agreement: Clear, Consociational, and Risky Donald L. Horowitz 89 5. Northern Ireland, Civic Nationalism, and the Good Friday Agreement John McGarry 109 6. Unsung Heroes? The Role of Peace and Conflict Resolution Organizations in the Northern Ireland Conflict Feargal Cochrane 137 Part II. Comparative Case-Studies 7. From Conflict to Agreement in Northern Ireland: Lessons from Europe Antony Alcock 159 8. Northern Ireland and the Basque Country Michael Keating 181 x Contents 9. Making the Transition from Hegemonic Regime to Power-Sharing: Northern Ireland and Canada in Historical Perspective S. J. R. Noel 209 10. Northern Ireland and Island Status Adrian Guelke 228 11. Taking the Gun out of Politics: Conflict Transformation in Northern Ireland and Lebanon Kirsten E. Schulze 253 12. Northern Ireland and South Africa: ‘Hope and History at a Crossroads’ Padraig O’Malley 276 13. The Tenability of Partition as a Mode of Conflict Regulation: Comparing Ireland with Palestine–Land of Israel Sammy Smooha 309 Index 337 1 Introduction: The Comparable Northern Ireland JOHN MCGARRY Northern Ireland is truly a place apart (editorial, Belfast Telegraph, 5 April 2000) For 30 years the politicians . of Northern Ireland have insisted their conflict cannot be compared to others (Kevin Cullen, journalist, Irish Times, 13 May 2000) ‘Ulster’, the world’s best laager! (sign in David Trimble’s Westminster office) We tried to answer, spoke of Arab, Jew, of Turk and Greek in Cyprus, Pakistan and India, but no sense flickered through that offered reason to a modern man why Europeans, Christians, working-class should thresh and struggle in that old morass (John Hewitt, Ulster poet)1 Say it once, Say it loud, I’m Black an’ I’m proud . The Irish are the niggers of Europe, lads. (Roddy Doyle, The Commitments)2 For many people, like the editorialists of the Belfast Telegraph or the audi- ence of John Hewitt’s poem, Northern Ireland is a place apart, its conflict the result of some unique pathology. This view was particularly dominant from the outbreak of the troubles until the early 1990s, although it is still subscribed to. Northern Ireland has been seen, variously, as a ‘sui generis, untypical and even anachronistic phenomenon’,3 a ‘peculiarly local conflict’,4 an ‘outlandish exception to all the rules’,5 or as possessing a ‘peculiar intractability’.6 However, many people, not just John Hewitt and Roddy Doyle, reject the idea that Northern Ireland is incomparable. Political partisans, contrary to 2 John McGarry Kevin Cullen’s insight, have been drawing parallels between Northern Ireland and other divided societies since at least the nineteenth century. Some of the best academic work on the Northern Ireland conflict, written by leading scholars from both outside and inside Northern Ireland, is com- parative in focus.7 The scope for comparative analysis has increased in recent years. As a result of better international communications, it has become easier for those inside and outside Northern Ireland to compare its conflict with others. With outside governments, particularly the United States, and non- governmental organizations playing an increasingly prominent role in Northern Ireland, there are more incentives for the region’s partisans to seek to influence external opinion through the drawing of appropriate parallels. There also appear to be more conflicts with which Northern Ireland can be compared: the end of the cold war has been followed by a series of confrontations in south-eastern Europe and the Caucasus, and has made it possible to focus more on other ongoing violent intra-state conflicts, in Spain, Indonesia, Sri Lanka, and Cyprus, as well as the non- violent dispute between Quebec and the rest of Canada. It has also ushered in peace processes in South Africa and Israel–Palestine that have been the focus of global attention. Finally, the process of European integration led some scholars to examine the possibilities it offers for different national minorities, including those in Northern Ireland, the Basque Country, and South Tyrol. This collection was assembled in part to allow leading comparativists to discuss Northern Ireland in light of these broad developments. Northern Ireland is compared with a significant number of the cases mentioned, including the Åland Island, Cyprus, and South Tyrol (Alcock); the Basque Country (Keating); Canada (Noel); Cyprus, Corsica, East Timor, Puerto Rico, and Sri Lanka (Guelke); Lebanon (Schulze); South Africa (O’Malley); and Israel–Palestine (Smooha). The collection is also a response to the Good Friday Agreement, the landmark settlement reached in April 1998. Contributors were asked to use comparative analysis to evaluate the Agreement and to assess whether it represents the optimal way forward. The judgements are rich and var- ied. Several of the contributions are written from a pro-Agreement per- spective. These include chapters written from a unionist perspective (Alcock), a loyalist perspective (Schulze), and a position that has been associated with that of moderate nationalists (McGarry, O’Leary). Other chapters are critical of the Agreement, including one that appears close to the position of republican rejectionists (Taylor) and another that reflects Introduction 3 concerns held by the Alliance Party (Horowitz). The various contribu- tions offer a wealth of prescriptive suggestions, including advice on how to design institutions for a bi-national society (McGarry, O’Leary); strengthen the Agreement to prevent breakdown (O’Leary); address the vexed question of the decommissioning of paramilitary weapons (Schulze); ensure that negotiations between rival groups succeed (O’Malley); build a multi-ethnic executive coalition that will last (Horowitz, Noel); and construct an integrated society from the grass roots up (Taylor). While a number of academics have examined Northern Ireland comparatively in monographs and journal articles, this is the first collection of essays on the subject. This introductory chapter provides an overview of the use of compara- tive analysis in Northern Ireland. The first section discusses the ways in which nationalist and unionist partisans have drawn links between Northern Ireland and other divided societies since before the conflict began in the late 1960s. The second section examines comparative analysis by academics over this same period. The chapter ends with a brief sum- mary of the various contributions to the collection, and situates these in relation to the existing literature. Partisans and Parallels8 Partisans everywhere draw parallels with other conflicts. Particular paral- lels are selected because they are considered appropriate: the partisans see the two cases as essentially similar. However, comparisons may also be used for their instrumental value. As the parallels invariably portray the group making them in a positive light and depict rivals negatively, they can help to rally one’s domestic constituency and attract sympathy from outsiders.9 Preferred parallels change, depending on circumstances: a comparison with a particular conflict may be dropped if the conflict ends or loses its international salience. There is also some evidence that an ethnic group’s choice of comparison may have real political consequences. If outsiders, including external governments and non-governmental organizations, accept the validity of a parallel between two conflicts, it may lead them to adopt the same approach towards one that they have taken towards the other. If actors in one conflict come to identify sufficiently with the actors in another, the latter’s behaviour may influence the former’s. There is evid- ence of both effects in Northern Ireland. 4 John McGarry During the 1960s Northern Ireland’s nationalists, particularly moderates, identified their plight with that of American blacks struggling for civil rights.10 This had the advantage of identifying Northern Ireland’s unionist regime with the white racist regimes of Alabama, Mississippi, and other parts of the Deep South. The parallel embarrassed Britain on the world stage and encouraged pressure from the United States for the reform of Northern Ireland. Like the US campaign, the appeal for civil rights in Northern Ireland was aimed at metropolitan citizens. The Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association, which began to challenge the unionist regime in 1964, was based on its American counterpart, although it was also inspired by the UK- based National Council for Civil Liberties. Catholics used the same slogans, ‘One man, one vote’ and ‘The world is watching’, and the same song, ‘We shall overcome’, as their American counterparts. More importantly, they employed the same tactics: civil disobedience and peaceful protest marches. It was thought that these tactics would have the same effect in Northern Ireland as they had in the United States, that is, that they would appeal to moderates in the dominant group and expose the intransigence of local chauvinists to liberal metropolitans. This was what happened. Nationalists
Recommended publications
  • Palacký University Olomouc ANGLOPHONE CONFERENCE 26
    The publication of this volume was generously supported and completed within the Specific researched project 2119, “Teaching Performing, Performing Teaching,” funded by the Faculty of Education, University of Hradec Králové. Vol. 6 HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ No. 1 JOURNAL 2019 OF ANGLOPHONE STUDIES Volume’s editor: Jan Suk Original illustrations: Ivan Mečl Published: Department of English Language and Literature Faculty of Education University of Hradec Králové Rokitanského 62 500 03 Hradec Králové Czech Republic Print: Tiskárna Brázda, Hodonín Web: pdf.uhk.cz/hkjas/ ISSN: 2336-3347 (Print) ISSN: 2571-032X (Online) Editorial Board Bohuslav Mánek, University of Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic Helena Polehlová, University of Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic Editor in Chief Jan Suk, University of Hradec Kralové, Czech Republic Volume’s Guest Editors Cyrielle Garson, Avignon University, France Daniel Schulze, Theater Konstanz, Germany Advisory Board Blanka Babická, Palacký University Olomouc, Czech Republic Šárka Bubíková, University of Pardubice, Czech Republic Richard Burt, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA Yilin Chen, Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan Jan Comorek, Charles University, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic Milada Franková, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic Jana Harťanská, Constantine the Philosopher University, Nitra, Slovakia Kacie Hittel Tam, University of Georgia, Athens, USA Mirka Horová, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic Vladimíra Ježdíková, University of Hradec Králové, Czech Republic Ema Jelínková, Palacký University
    [Show full text]
  • The Lessons of Northern Ireland: Lessons of Northern Ireland and the Relevance of the Regional Context
    Adrian Guelke The lessons of Northern Ireland: lessons of Northern Ireland and the relevance of the regional context Report Original citation: Guelke, Adrian (2011) The lessons of Northern Ireland: lessons of Northern Ireland and the relevance of the regional context. IDEAS reports - special reports, Kitchen, Nicholas (ed.) SR008. LSE IDEAS, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK. This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/43485/ Originally available from LSE IDEAS Available in LSE Research Online: May 2012 © 2011 The Author LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. Lessons of Northern Ireland and the Relevance of the Regional Context Adrian Guelke t should be stated at the outset that the notion of Northern Ireland’s political settlement Ias a model for other societies evokes as much hostility as it does enthusiasm. Indeed, at least as much has been written in criticism of the idea of Northern Ireland as a model as in its support. Understanding the perspective of the critics on this issue is a useful starting point for reviewing the lessons to be learnt from the application to Northern Ireland of a variety of counter terrorism and conflict resolution policies, since it provides a means of sorting out in which respects Northern Ireland’s experience might be relevant to other cases and in which it is not.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Families' History and Heritage Making at the Crossroads of New
    Voicing the stories of the excluded: Albanian families’ history and heritage making at the crossroads of new and old homes Eleni Vomvyla UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted for the award of Doctor in Philosophy in Cultural Heritage 2013 Declaration of originality I, Eleni Vomvyla confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature 2 To the five Albanian families for opening their homes and sharing their stories with me. 3 Abstract My research explores the dialectical relationship between identity and the conceptualisation/creation of history and heritage in migration by studying a socially excluded group in Greece, that of Albanian families. Even though the Albanian community has more than twenty years of presence in the country, its stories, often invested with otherness, remain hidden in the Greek ‘mono-cultural’ landscape. In opposition to these stigmatising discourses, my study draws on movements democratising the past and calling for engagements from below by endorsing the socially constructed nature of identity and the denationalisation of memory. A nine-month fieldwork with five Albanian families took place in their domestic and neighbourhood settings in the areas of Athens and Piraeus. Based on critical ethnography, data collection was derived from participant observation, conversational interviews and participatory techniques. From an individual and family group point of view the notion of habitus led to diverse conceptions of ethnic identity, taking transnational dimensions in families’ literal and metaphorical back- and-forth movements between Greece and Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • How New Is New Loyalism?
    HOW NEW IS NEW LOYALISM? CATHERINE MCGLYNN EUROPEAN STUDIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE UNIVERSITY OF SALFORD SALFORD, UK Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements of the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy, February 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction Page 1 Chapter One Hypothesis and Methodology Page 6 Chapter Two Literature Review: Unionism, Loyalism, Page 18 New Loyalism Chapter Three A Civic Loyalism? Page 50 Chapter Four The Roots of New Loyalism 1966-1982 Page 110 Chapter Five New Loyalism and the Peace Process Page 168 Chapter Six New Loyalism and the Progressive Page 205 Unionist Party Chapter Seven Conclusion: How New is New Loyalism? Page 279 Bibliography Page 294 ABBREVIATONS CLMC Combined Loyalist Military Command DENI Department of Education for Northern Ireland DUP Democratic Unionist Party IOO Independent Orange Order IRA Irish Republican Army LAW Loyalist Association of Workers LVF Loyalist Volunteer Force NICRA Northern Ireland Civil Rights Association NIHE Northern Ireland Housing Executive NILP Northern Ireland Labour Party PUP Progressive Unionist Party RHC Red Hand Commandos RHD Red Hand Defenders SDLP Social Democratic and Labour Party UDA Ulster Defence Association UDP Ulster Democratic Party UDLP Ulster Democratic and Loyalist Party UFF Ulster Freedom Fighters UUP Ulster Unionist Party UUUC United Ulster Unionist Council UWC Ulster Workers' Council UVF Ulster Volunteer Force VPP Volunteer Political Party ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my PhD supervisor, Jonathan Tonge for all his support during my time at Salford University. I am also grateful to all the staff at the Northern Irish Political collection at the Linen Hall Library in Belfast for their help and advice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Referendum in FW De Klerk's War of Manoeuvre
    The referendum in F.W. de Klerk’s war of manoeuvre: An historical institutionalist account of the 1992 referendum. Gary Sussman. London School of Economics and Political Science. Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government and International History, 2003 UMI Number: U615725 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U615725 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 T h e s e s . F 35 SS . Library British Library of Political and Economic Science Abstract: This study presents an original effort to explain referendum use through political science institutionalism and contributes to both the comparative referendum and institutionalist literatures, and to the political history of South Africa. Its source materials are numerous archival collections, newspapers and over 40 personal interviews. This study addresses two questions relating to F.W. de Klerk's use of the referendum mechanism in 1992. The first is why he used the mechanism, highlighting its role in the context of the early stages of his quest for a managed transition.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction
    Notes 1 Introduction 1. For an understanding of the background to the Northern Ireland conflict see Paul Bew and Gordon Gillespie, Northern Ireland: A Chronology of the Troubles 1968–1999 (Dublin: Gill & Macmillan, 1999); Brendan O’Leary and John McGarry, Explaining Northern Ireland (Oxford: Blackwell, 1995); and Jennifer Todd and Joseph Ruane, The Dynamics of Conflict in Northern Ireland: Power, Conflict and Emancipation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996). 2. Inter-party talks were launched by the Secretary of State, Peter Brooke, in January 1990. These continued after the 1992 British general election under Sir Patrick Mayhew. See David Bloomfield, Political Dialogue in Northern Ireland: The Brooke Initiative, 1989–1992 (London: Macmillan, 1998). 3. The Agreement was unofficially dubbed the ‘Good Friday Agreement’ because it was signed on Good Friday, two days before Easter Sunday. However, the Agreement is also referred to as the ‘Belfast Agreement’ because it was signed in Belfast. The official document is simply titled ‘The Agreement’. 4. Hugh Miall, Oliver Ramsbotham and Tom Woodhouse, Contemporary Conflict Resolution (Oxford: Polity Press, 1999) p. 154. 5. See Cynthia Arnson, ed., Comparative Peace Processes in Latin America (Cali- fornia; Stanford University Press, 1999); John Darby and Roger MacGinty, eds, The Management of Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2000); John Darby and Roger MacGinty, Contemporary Peace Making: Conflict, Viol- ence and Peace Processes (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003); Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson, and Pamela Aall, eds, Turbulent Peace: The Challenges of Managing International Conflict (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 2001); and Chester A. Crocker, Fen Osler Hampson and Pamela Aall, eds, Managing Global Chaos: Sources of and Responses to International Conflict (Washington DC: United States Institute of Peace Press, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Pasts, Futures, and Connections Between Scotland, Ulster,1 and Ireland: a Critique of Some Historiographical Tendencies
    G. K. Peatling IRSS 32 (2007) 33 Pasts, Futures, and Connections between Scotland, Ulster,1 and Ireland: a critique of some historiographical tendencies G. K.Peatling* The diversity of historical interactions between Scotland and modern Ireland, especially Northern Ireland, is not in doubt. But the nature and effect of the paramount Scottish influences upon Northern Ireland are disputed. That there are also cognate disputes pertaining to the future of Northern Ireland, and the likely future of relations between Scotland and Northern Ireland, raises fundamental questions as to the purpose of academic study of such historical questions. Even scholarly depictions of the past of Scottish-Irish connections may make implicit assumptions about how the legacy of these connections may impede or nurture certain future developments in both locations. To offer any such depiction may thus be to make political recommendations on some fiercely contested present controversies, such as the likely political future of these constituent nations or regions of the British Isles or north Atlantic archipelago. This paper reviews perceptions of likely futures of Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland which historically-informed commentators have advanced, identifying four strands in such analyses. Because none of these perceptions are entirely sound, this essay is partly an illustration of the seductive, and at times delusive, attraction of historical and political parallels and analogies. Significantly however, a common deficiency in such analyses lies in exaggerations of the significance of connections, parallels and affinities between Northern Ireland (or Ireland) and Scotland. Armed thus with a caution as to the errors that such overstatements may produce, this paper offers its own estimates * Dr Gary Peatling is Lecturer in European/British History at the University of Plymouth.
    [Show full text]
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Party Politics of Political Decentralization Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6jw6f00k Author Wainfan, Kathryn Tanya Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles The Party Politics of Political Decentralization A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 c Copyright by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Party Politics of Political Decentralization by Kathryn Tanya Wainfan Doctor of Philosophy in Political Science University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor Michael F. Thies, Chair In this dissertation, I ask why certain types of parties would agree to support creating or empowering sub-national governments. In particular, I focus on nationalized parties { those that gain support from throughout a country. Political decentralization can negatively impact nationalized parties in at least two ways. First, it reduces the amount of power a party can enjoy should it win control of the national-level government. Second, previous studies show that political decentralization can increase party denationalization, meaning regional parties gain more support, even during national-level elections. I argue that nationalized parties may support decentralization when doing so reduces the ideological conflicts over national-level policy among voters whose support they seek. By altering political institutions, a party may be able to accommodate differing policy prefer- ences in different parts of the country, or limit the damage to the party's electoral fortunes such differences could create.
    [Show full text]
  • Cronin-Sheehan Interviews 2001 and 2002
    Cronin-Sheehan Interviews 2001 and 2002 The two interviews I did with Jeremy Cronin in 2001 and 2002 met with a storm of controversy and were much discussed in the mass media and at political meetings as well as much cited in academic texts. Due to the re-organisation of the DCU website, they have been inaccessible for an interval, but I am reposting them, because it is important that they be accessible for the historical record. I have merged them here as a single document. Jeremy Cronin in his office in the South African Parliament in January 2002. Photo by Helena Sheehan First Interview with Jeremy Cronin MP by Dr Helena Sheehan on 17 April 2001 at University of Cape Town HS: Jeremy, can you outline the basic trajectory of your intellectual development? How would you describe it? JC: It is undeveloped. HS: Well to the extent that any of us are developed … JC: Ok. Grew up in a middle class white English-speaking South African family. All of those things are significant in a South African context, not least for intellectual development. My father was a Catholic and that was also important from an intellectual developmental point of view. He died when I was 10 years old and we moved to very close to where we're sitting now in Rondebosch. I went to a Marist brothers school and I would guess that that was an early influence in terms of an interest in philosophy. A sort of intellectually serious, probably pretentiously serious, approach to things came at that stage when I was 13 or 14 from some extremely eccentric defrocked priests who were then teaching at the Marist brothers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925
    WITHOUT A "DOG'S CHANCE:" THE DEVLINITE IRISH NEWS, NORTHERN IRELAND'S "TRAPPED" NATIONALIST MINORITY, AND THE IRISH BOUNDARY QUESTION, 1921-1925 by James A. Cousins Master ofArts, Acadia University 2000 Bachelor ofArts, Acadia University 1997 THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Department ofHistory © James A. Cousins 2008 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2008 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission ofthe author. APPROVAL Name: James A. Cousins Degree: Doctor of Philosophy Title ofProject: Without a "Dog's Chance:" The Devlinite Irish News, Northern Ireland's "Trapped" Nationalist Minority, and the Irish Boundary Question, 1921-1925 Examining Committee: Chair Dr. Alexander Dawson, Associate Professor Department ofHistory Dr. John Stubbs, Professor Senior Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Wil1een Keough, Assistant Professor Supervisor Department ofHistory Dr. Leith Davis, Professor Supervisor Department ofEnglish Dr. John Craig, Professor Internal Examiner Department ofHistory Dr. Peter Hart, Professor External Examiner Department ofHistory, Memorial University of Newfoundland Date Approved: 11 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY LIBRARY Declaration of Partial Copyright Licence The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project or extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, and to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users.
    [Show full text]
  • Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland's Conflict, and Its Agreement
    John McGarry and Brendan O’Leary1 Consociational Theory, Northern Ireland’s Conflict, and its Agreement. Part 1: What Consociationalists Can Learn from Northern Ireland I did not draw my principles from my prejudices, but from the nature of things.2 ‘What a wonderful place the world would be’, cry the devotees of each way of life, ‘if only everyone were like us’. We can now see the fallacy in this fre- quently expressed lament: it is only the presence in the world of people who are different from them that enables adherents of each way of life to be the way they are.3 CONSOCIATIONAL THEORY, DEVELOPED BY AREND LIJPHART AND other scholars, is one of the most influential theories in comparative political science. Its key contention is that divided territories, be they regions or states, with historically antagonistic ethnically, religiously or linguistically divided peoples, are effectively, prudently, and some- times optimally, governed according to consociational principles. Consociations can be both democratic and authoritarian,4 but 1 The authors thank the editors of Government and Opposition, and its two anony- mous referees, for their very helpful suggestions. McGarry thanks the Carnegie Corporation of New York for funding his research, O’Leary thanks the Lauder endowment, and both authors thank the United States Institute of Peace. 2 Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu, ‘Preface’, in Anne M. Cohler, Basia C. Miller and Harold S. Stone (eds), The Spirit of the Laws, Cambridge, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 1989 (first publication, 1748), p. xliii. 3 Michael Thompson, Richard Ellis, Aaron Wildavsky, Cultural Theory, Boulder, CO, Westview Press, 1990, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Nicholas Brooke Phd Thesis
    THE DOGS THAT DIDN'T BARK: POLITICAL VIOLENCE AND NATIONALISM IN SCOTLAND, WALES AND ENGLAND Nicholas Brooke A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 2016 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/8079 This item is protected by original copyright The Dogs That Didn't Bark: Political Violence and Nationalism in Scotland, Wales and England Nicholas Brooke This thesis is submitted in partial fulfilment for the degree of PhD at the University of St Andrews 30th June 2015 1 Abstract The literature on terrorism and political violence covers in depth the reasons why some national minorities, such as the Irish, Basques and Tamils, have adopted violent methods as a means of achieving their political goals, but the study of why similar groups (such as the Scots and Welsh) remained non-violent, has been largely neglected. In isolation it is difficult to adequately assess the key variables behind why something did not happen, but when compared to a similar violent case, this form of academic exercise can be greatly beneficial. This thesis demonstrates what we can learn from studying ‘negative cases’ - nationalist movements that abstain from political violence - particularly with regards to how the state should respond to minimise the likelihood of violent activity, as well as the interplay of societal factors in the initiation of violent revolt. This is achieved by considering the cases of Wales, England and Scotland, the latter of which recently underwent a referendum on independence from the United Kingdom (accomplished without the use of political violence) and comparing them with the national movement in Ireland, looking at both violent and non-violent manifestations of nationalism in both territories.
    [Show full text]