DOCSLIB.ORG

Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd T H A M E S V A L L E Y ARCHAEOLOGICAL S E R V I C E S 14–16 Milkingpen Lane, Old Basing, Basingstoke, Hampshire An Archaeological Watching Brief by Jennifer Lowe and Sean Wallis Site Code: MLB06/65 (SU 6675 5302) 14-16 Milkingpen Lane, Old Basing, Basingstoke, Hampshire An Archaeological Watching Brief For Dr Weaver & Partners by Jennifer Lowe and Sean Wallis Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd Site Code MLB 06/65 December 2006 Summary Site name: 14-16 Milkingpen Lane, Old Basing, Basingstoke, Hampshire Grid reference: SU6675 5302 Site activity: Watching Brief Date and duration of project: 19th July – 21st August 2006 Project manager: Steve Ford Site supervisor: Jennifer Lowe and Sean Wallis Site code: MLB06/65 Area of site: 2688 sq m Summary of results: The watching brief revealed a moderate quantity of archaeological features including ditches, gullies, several pits and a square structure. The majority of features encountered suggested activity on the site during the 13th century with later activity, mid 16th-17th century, in the form of a ditch. Three sherds of residual Romano-British pottery were also recovered during the course of the works. Monuments identified: Medieval pits, ditches, square structure. Post-medieval ditch. Location and reference of archive: The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited Hampshire Museum Service in due course. This report may be copied for bona fide research or planning purposes without the explicit permission of the copyright holder Report edited/checked by: Steve Ford 21.12.06 Steve Preston 21.12.06 i Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd, 47–49 De Beauvoir Road, Reading RG1 5NR Tel. (0118) 926 0552; Fax (0118) 926 0553; email [email protected]; website : www.tvas.co.uk 14-16 Milkingpen Lane, Old Basing, Basingstoke, Hampshire An Archaeological Watching Brief by Jennifer Lowe and Sean Wallis Report 06/65 Introduction This report documents the results of an archaeological watching brief carried out at 14–16 Milkingpen Lane, Old Basing, Basingstoke, Hampshire (SU 6675 5302) (Fig. 1). The work was commissioned by Mr Paul Rogers of CMS Bath Ltd, The Mews, 51–53 High Street, Corsham, Wiltshire, SN13 0EZ on behalf of Dr A Weaver and Partners, Odiham GP Surgery, Deer Park View, Odiham, Hampshire, RG29 1JY. Planning permission (BDB/58724) has been gained from Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council to demolish two existing bungalows on the site at Milkingpen Lane and erect a new doctor’s surgery and pharmacy as well as some residential properties. The consent is subject to a condition (28) which requires the implementation of a programme of archaeological work, in this case a watching brief, to be carried out on any ground disturbing works. This is in accordance with the Department of the Environment’s Planning Policy Guidance, Archaeology and Planning (PPG16 1990), and the Borough’s policies on archaeology. The field investigation was carried out to a specification approved by Mr Stephen Appleby, Senior Archaeologist for Hampshire County Council, archaeological adviser to Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council. The fieldwork was undertaken by Jennifer Lowe, Marianne Moen and Sean Wallis between 19th July and 21st August 2006 and the site code is MLB06/65. The archive is presently held at Thames Valley Archaeological Services, Reading and will be deposited with Hampshire Museum Service in due course. Location, topography and geology The site is situated within the historic core of Old Basing, which is located to the east of Basingstoke (Fig. 1). The site is a roughly rectangular plot of land with its northern boundary delineated by a railway line and Milkingpen Lane forming its eastern boundary (Fig. 2). Manor Lane marks its southern boundary and a residential property with associated garden is situated to the west. The site, prior to development, was occupied by two bungalows towards the centre of the site; gardens occupied the remainder of the plot. The centre of the site lies at height of approximately 81m above Ordnance Datum, however, there is a gradual slope upwards from 1 Manor Lane to the railway. The underlying geology is mapped as Reading Beds (BGS 1978); a yellow clay natural was observed on site. Archaeological background Prehistoric activity is recorded within close proximity of the site with numerous Mesolithic and Neolithic flint scatters in the area as well as Bronze Age and Iron Age burials. Several Bronze Age barrows are also recorded to the south-east of Old Basing. Roman activity is well recorded in the area with settlement sites excavated at Old Basing and Cowdery’s Down and Roman pottery scatters close to Milkingpen Lane. The Roman Road from Silchester (Calleva Atrebatum) to Chichester (Noviomagus Regensium) passes to the east of Milkingpen Lane, and a small section of the road was excavated during the laying of a pipeline (Moore 2002). Saxon activity is not as well represented in the area, although a Middle Saxon settlement has been excavated to the west of the site at Riverdene (Hall and Weaver 2003) and both Basingstoke and Old Basing have Saxon origins. Old Basing is recorded as Basengum in 871 AD meaning ‘(Settlement of) the family or followers of (a man called) Basa’ (Mills 1998). Basingstoke is recorded as Basingastoc in 990 and Basingestoches by 1086 meaning ‘a secondary settlement or outlying farmstead of the family or followers of a man called Basa’ (Mills 1998). By the time of Domesday Book (AD1086) Basing is recorded as Basinges and was held by a Hugh de Port. Before the conquest the settlement was assessed at 11 hides however post Conquest it was only accounted at 6½ hides. (Williams and Martin 2002). According to Domesday Book there was land for 10 ploughs, 7 slaves, 3 mills, 19 acres of meadow and woodland for 25 pigs; before the Conquest Old Basing was valued at £12 and by 1086 at £16 (Williams and Martin 2002). The archaeological potential of the site stems from its location within the historic core of Old Basing, with the parish church located roughly 150m to the south west of the site. Work carried out to the west of the site at 7 Manor Lane identified human remains indicating the presence of a possible graveyard close to the site (Coles 2004). The site of a Norman ringwork and bailey exists at Old Basing House further to the south-west, and a later fortified Tudor house is located inside the ringwork. This site was besieged during the Civil War with the Royalist civil war earthworks still present. A medieval Tithe Barn and post-medieval watermill also exist within close proximity to the site. 2 Objectives and methodology The purpose of the watching brief was to excavate and record any archaeological deposits affected by the groundworks. This would involve examination of all areas of intrusive groundworks, in particular any ground reduction, and the digging of foundation trenches and service runs. Two plots were to be excavated on the site (Fig. 3). Plot 1, in the north-west corner of the site was for a doctor’s surgery. This entire plot was to be reduced by over a metre therefore disturbing any archaeology, if present. The remainder of the site including Plot 2 in the south-east corner was also to be reduced but not by quite so much as Plot 1. In discussion with the county archaeologist it was decided that the site should be stripped to the archaeologically relevant layer and any archaeology exposed to be dealt with prior to construction, particularly in the case of Plot 1, where any archaeology would be completely destroyed by the proposed development. Approximately 0.10-0.20m of topsoil was removed across the site to reveal the archaeologically relevant level. All archaeology exposed within the foundation of plot 1 was planned and excavated. Across the remainder of the site archaeology was simply planned if it was not to be disturbed further or planned and recorded in section in the case of Plot 2. Where possible, finds were retrieved from all deposits and features. An electricity cable trench was excavated along the east edge of the site, in the south east corner. The trench was approximately 0.70m wide and 0.50m deep. No archaeology was observed in this trench. Results A total of 23 features were identified, including ditches, pits and a square structure (Figs 3 and 4). Pottery was retrieved from approximately half of the features and many, particularly in Plot 2, had a direct stratigraphic relationship with another. Apart from a single ditch (1001), all the features can be dated either closely to the early 13th century or only more generally to an undetermined date between the 11th and 14th century. Ceramic periods can be distinguished within this medieval phase, but essentially these amount to little more than ‘closely dated (CP2: early to middle 13th century)’ and ‘broadly dated’ (CP1 and CP3; and CP3’s pottery is all in a post- medieval feature). As the features all appear to involve the same kinds of activity in the same location, it is considered that they all form a single phase in the 13th century. 3 Phase 1: 13th century Pit 8 was identified during the initial strip of the site, on the southern margins of Plot 1 (Fig. 3). This feature was approximately 5m in length, 3m wide and 1.20m deep. It had six fills (58–63) with a total of 26 sherds of pottery collected from 60, 63 and 64. A single sherd of Roman pottery was recovered from fill 58. Ditch 1000, recorded crossing Plot 1 from north-east to south-west had two slots (1 and 4) excavated through its length.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Medieval Pottery from Romsey: an Overview
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 67 (pt. II), 2012, 323–346 (Hampshire Studies 2012) MEDIEVAL POTTERY FROM ROMSEY: AN OVERVIEW By BEN JERVIS ABSTRACT is evidence of both prehistoric and Roman occupation, but this paper will deal only with This paper summarises the medieval pottery recovered the medieval archaeology, from the mid-Saxon from excavations undertaken by Test Valley Archae- period to the 16th century. ological Trust in Romsey, Hampshire from the Several excavations took place between the 1970’s–1990’s. A brief synthesis of the archaeology of 1970’s–90’s in the precinct of Romsey Abbey Romsey is presented followed by a dated catalogue of (see Scott 1996). It has been suggested on the pottery types identified, including discussions of the basis of historical evidence and a series fabric, form and wider affinities. The paper concludes of excavated, early, graves that the late Saxon with discussions of the supply of pottery to Romsey in abbey was built on the site of an existing eccle- the medieval period and also considers ceramic use siastical establishment, possibly a minster in the town. church (Collier 1990, 45; Scott 1996, 7). The foundation of the nunnery itself can be dated to the 10th century (Scott 1996, 158), but it INTRODUCTION was evacuated in AD 1001, due to the threat of Danish attack, being re-founded later in The small town of Romsey has been the focus the 11th century. The abbey expanded during of much archaeological excavation over the last the Norman period, with the building of the 30–40 years, but very little has been published choir and nave (Scott 1996, 7).
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin N U M B E R 3 2 0 May/June 1998
    Registered Charity No: 272098 ISSN 0585-9980 SURREY ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY CASTLE ARCH, GUILDFORD GU1 3SX Tel/Fax: 01483 532454 E-mail: [email protected] Bulletin N u m b e r 3 2 0 May/June 1998 BRONZE AGE HUT FOUND AT LALEHAM Post-built round house, looking north-west through its entrance. Preliminary work on the finds suggest a date in the late 2nd millennium BC. Ranging Rods marl<ed in 0.20m divisions, but ttie director, Graham t-iayman, provides a human scale whilst demonstrating his understanding of contemporary folk-dancing. Excavations at Home Farm, Laleham in 1997 Graham Hayman In May and June of last year the Surrey County Archaeological Unit undertook excavations at Home Farm, Laleham, for Greenham Construction Materials Ltd, as part of an archaeological scheme of work approved to comply with the conditions of a Planning Permission for the extraction of gravel. Home Farm Quarry Is being worked In phases over several years, with each phase area being restored to Its agricultural purposes once quarrying Is completed. Work in 1997 was in the Phase 6 area and proceeded as a result of discoveries made during an evaluation by trenching in March 1997. Five areas A to E were excavated. Areas A to C in the south revealed occasional small pits and post-holes, two large water-holes, various ditches, and at least two cremation burials. Most features were sparsely distributed, however, with no significant concentrations; and produced only a few pot sherds and/or pieces of struck flint. Such a paucity of finds made it difficult to date some features, but a provisional assessment is that most were of Bronze Age date, some may be Neolithic, and at least one ditch was probably Roman.
    [Show full text]
  • Surrey-Hampshire Border Ware Ceramics in Seventeenth-Century
    SURREY-HAMPSHIRE BORDER WARE CERAMICS IN SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH NORTH AMERICA by © Catherine Margaret Hawkins A Thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland April 2016 St. John’s Newfoundland and Labrador Abstract During the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, Surrey-Hampshire Border ware ceramics were among of the most popular and widely used ceramics in southern England. This ceramic, produced along the Surrey-Hampshire border, was also shipped to English colonies in North America throughout the seventeenth century. This thesis will explore the types of vessels uncovered on archaeological sites in Newfoundland, New England and the Chesapeake, and examine the similarities and differences in the forms available to various colonists during this time period. By comparing the collections of Border ware found at various sites it is possible to not only determine what vessel forms are present in Northeastern English North America, but to determine the similarities and differences in vessels based on temporal, geographic, social or economic factors. A comparative study of Border ware also provides information on the socio- economic status of the colonists and on trading networks between England and North America during the seventeenth century. i Acknowledgements Grateful thanks are due first and foremost to my supervisor, Dr. Barry Gaulton, for everything he has done for me over the years. My interest in historical archaeology originated through working with Barry and Dr. Jim Tuck at Ferryland several years ago and I cannot thank him enough for his continued support, enthusiasm, advice and encouragement throughout the course of this research project.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDIEVAL POTTERY RESEARCH GROUP Newsletter 74 November 2012 ______
    MEDIEVAL POTTERY RESEARCH GROUP newsletter 74 November 2012 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Secretary’s Notes Council met in September at the British Museum had held some very constructive discussions about the future directions which the group’s activities may take. Two topics dominated the agenda, the first of these was training. Alice Forward has undertaken some research into the kinds of specialist and non-specialist training currently available and which might be offered by the group in the future. We welcome any comments from members regarding the kinds of training which you would find useful and any comments on this subject should be addressed to the president. The second issue relates to the maintaining of standards, particularly within reports produced from developer-led projects. Central to this is co-operation with our Prehistoric and Roman colleagues in the production of joint standards, which can be easily disseminated to local authority curators. A need for non-specialist training into these standards was identified and we will be pursuing this with our colleagues within the curatorial sector going forward. In November members of the group came together with colleagues from the Association for the History of Glass at a conference held in honour of the late Sarah Jennings. Unfortunately I was unable to attend, but I hear from colleagues that this day was a great success and, more importantly, a fitting tribute to Sarah. Thanks are extended to Julie Edwards and Sarah Paynter for their hard work in organising the conference, and in pushing forward with plans for a festschrift in Sarah’s memory. Additionally, Chris Jarrett is continuing to work on a similar publication in honour of Anna Slowikowski.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Newsletter 78
    MEDIEVAL POTTERY RESEARCH GROUP newsletter 78 April 2014 _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Secretary’s Notes Pipkins are red, Stonewares are blue, Your MPRG Council really needs you! Rather than write the usual set of Secretary’s Notes that goes out in advance of an impending MPRG AGM, this time round I thought I would keep it short and sweet and instead direct you to a separate mailing, coming hot on the heels of this Newsletter, which will shed some light on what drives the Secretary to start penning very bad verse! Council met again at the end of January to discuss and drive on the work of the group. These days there is a great deal to cover in meetings with the wide range of work that the Group is involved in, from managing the John Hurst Travel Fund (see this issue for more information) and liaising with the British Museum over improving access to the Alan Vince Archive, through arranging a new set of Specialist Training Courses for 2015 and developing an online type-series database, to producing the next volume of Medieval Ceramics and making out of print copies of Medieval Ceramics available online via Scribe over the next few months (please check the website for updates). This list doesn’t even cover the work to produce a new Occasional Paper on Medieval Roof Furniture and of course the efforts going into arranging this year’s three-day conference in Lisbon (also see this issue for more information). Sadly these days, with the challenges that we face in funding the work we do for the benefit, not only of the membership, but for the whole of the archaeological community, much of our more recent meetings have focused on reducing costs, maximising funds and finding new ways of doing more with less.
    [Show full text]
  • EH20-WB Final Report.Pdf
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL WATCHING BRIEF AT EYOT HOUSE, CHURCH STREET, SHOREHAM, SEVENOAKS, KENT TN14 7SB Planning Reference: SE/20/00795 NGR: TQ 5208 6159 DAS Site Code: EH20-WB OASIS Reference Number: TBC Report prepared for Duncan MacRae (Client) By Darnley Archaeological Services Ltd Company, No 12320658 Report Number DAS 006/20/EH20-WB November 2020 1 Contents 1.0 SUMMARY 3 2.0 INTRODUCTION 3 3.0 LOCATION, TOPOGRAPHY & GEOLOGY 4 4.0 ARCHAEOLOGICAL & HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 6 5.0 METHODOLOGY 10 6.0 SUMMARY OF RESULTS 11 7.0 FINDS 19 8.0 INTERPRETATION 20 9.0 CONCLUSION 20 10.0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 20 11.0 REFERENCES 21 List of Appendices 12. APPENDIX A – SITE IMAGES 22-27 13. APPENDIX B – SITE FINDS 25-27 List of Figures Figure 1 - 1:250000 Site Location of EH20-WB 4 Figure 2 – 1:25000 Site Location of EH20-WB 5 Figure 3 – 1:3500 Heritage Assets nearby EH20-WB 5 Figure 4 – 1:5000 Site Location within Conservation Area 6 Figure 5 – 1:500 EH20-WB Groundworks Location 6 Figure 6 - 1:200 EH20-WB Completed Groundworks 11 Figure 7 – 1:50 EH20-WB Trench 1 13 Figure 8 – 1:10 EN20-WB Section 1 13 Figure 9 – 1:50 EH20-WB Trench 2 15 Figure 10 – 1:10 EH20-WB Section 2 15 Figure 11 – 1:50 EH20-WB Trench 3 16 Figure 12 – 1:10 EH20-WB Section 3 16 Figure 13 – 1871 OS Map 17 Figure 14 – 1897 OS Map 18 Document Control Component: Name: Date: Report prepared by: Richard Taylor 19 Nov 2020 Illustrations prepared by: Darnley Archaeological Services Report edited by: Sarah Hall 20 Nov 2020 Report reviewed by: n/a Version no: 1.1 2 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Enfield Archaeological Society Archive Report
    ENFIELD ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOCIETY ARCHIVE REPORT A SECTION ACROSS THE SOUTHERN PERIMETER OF ELSYNG PALACE, FORTY HALL, ENFIELD, JULY 2014 (SITE CODE FXI14) (SCHEDULED ANCIENT MONUMENT LO 59) (EXCAVATION CENTRED TQ 3379 9885) by MARTIN J. DEARNE with contributions by NEIL PINCHBECK IAN JONES Illustrators Martin J. Dearne Neil Pinchbeck The material contained herein is and remains the sole property of the Enfield Archaeological Society and is not for publication to third parties without prior consent. Whilst every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information contained within this report the Enfield Archaeological Society cannot be held responsible for errors or inaccuracies herein. Cover: Cologne Stoneware Vessel Decorated with Oak Leaves and Acorns (See Appendix 3, 5.1) (Photograph Neil Pinchbeck) Enfield Archaeological Society and the Authors 2014 FXI14: site director and project manager Martin J. Dearne; co project manager Mike Dewbrey. Client commissioning the EAS: London Borough of Enfield. Contracting organisations’ contact details : www.enfarchsoc.org.uk Val Munday Mike Dewbrey, Secretary, EAS, Chairman, EAS, 88 Gordon Hill, 35 Dahlia Close Enfield Cheshunt EN7 6NR, EN2 0QS Tel : 01707 873 756 Tel: 0795 735 2570 Martin J. Dearne Research and Excavations Director, EAS 9 Junction Rd. Edmonton London N9 7JS Tel : 0208 807 7079 E-mail : [email protected] CONTENTS Abstract 2 Illustrations: Introduction 2 Fig. 1 Geophysical Evidence 21 Objectives and Methods 3 Fig. 2 Overall Plan and Section 21 Historical Background 3 Fig. 3 The Outer ?Moat 22 Archaeological Background 3 Fig. 4 The Inner Moat 23 Stratigraphic Sequence 4 Fig. 5 The Facade Wall 24 Discussion 8 Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise & Fall and Stumbles of English Ceramic Factories
    London Ceramic Circle at Morley College Programme for the 49th Annual Seminar The rise & fall and stumbles of English ceramic factories 20 & 21 October 2018 Front cover: New Jazz' a stoneware and porcelain thrown and assembled sculpture, from the 'Isolator' series, Johannes Nagel, Germany, 2014. © Victoria and Albert Museum 2 Saturday 20 October 2018 10.00 John Sandon Welcome and Introduction LCC President 10.10 Anton Gabszewicz The Minnie Holdaway Memorial Lecture: Three Pioneers of English Porcelain 11.10 COFFEE 11.45 Felicity Marno The Rise of Derby, Fall of Rockingham and Stumble of Lord Dudley 12.45 LUNCH 14.00 Jacqui Pearce The inexorable rise of the medieval Surrey whiteware potteries Artistic Ambitions and Business Realities in 15.00 Robin Emmerson Wedgwood’s Ornamental Ware 16.00 TEA 16.30 John Democratis Spode: “Bad Taste”. “Vulgarity”. “Neat when … least pretentious”. “Hideous”. “Commercial success evidently enormous.” 17.30 WINE & CHEESE PARTY 18.30 EXIT 3 Sunday 21 October 2018 10.00 Jonathan Gray The rise and fall of the Swansea and Nantgarw Potteries focusing on 1764-1823 11.00 COFFEE 11.45 Chris Brown Caughley - The Factory that Vanished 12.45 LUNCH 14.00 John Sandon Where Worcester went wrong The Varied Fortunes of 18th- Century 15.00 Maurice Hillis Liverpool Porcelain Factories 16.00 John Sandon Closing Address 16.15 TEA 17.00 EXIT 4 Anton Gabszewicz Saturday 10.10 The Minnie Holdaway Memorial Lecture: Three Pioneers of English Porcelain It is remarkable that the three men who were most involved with the early years of the English porcelain industry should have made their names first in other disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections Development Policy Kingston Museum Revised October
    Collections Development Policy Kingston Museum Revised October 2016 1 Governing Body: Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames The governing body within the Council is the Place Directorate. Policies are approved by the Director of Place and were approved on: Roy Thompson Director of Place Date at which policy due for review: October 2020 Policy review procedure: The collections development policy will be published and reviewed from time to time, at least once every five years. Arts Council England will be notified of any changes to the collections development policy, and the implications of any such changes for the future of collections. 1. Relationship to other relevant policies/plans of the organisation: This Collections Development Policy relates to and is supported by the Forward Plan 2016-2020, the Documentation Policy Statement, the Care and Conservation Policy, the Access and Research Policy and the Audience Development Plan. It will also influence the development of planned policies, such as those around digital collections. This policy has been created in consultation with Kingston Heritage Service (KHS) staff, the Head of Libraries, Museums and Archives, and the Interim Head of Culture, to align with the strategy for the entire Heritage Service and Culture Team . These policies have been written to incorporate requirements of Museum Accreditation for Kingston Museum. Next year Kingston History Centre will apply for Archive Accreditation. The museum’s statement of purpose is: To identify and celebrate what is uniquely special about our borough and its people, locales, traditions and institutions and to build on this history while striving to discover, record and share the new stories occurring all around us.
    [Show full text]
  • Es a Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and Medieval
    LINCOLN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES NO. 7 Medieval Pottery from Lincoln from Pottery Medieval A Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and A Corpus A Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Pottery from Lincoln Lincoln Archaeological Studies Series Editors: Michael J. Jones and Alan Vince No. 1 No. 6 Pre-Viking Lindsey Corpus of Roman Pottery from Lincoln No. 2 No. 7 The Archaeology of Wigford ACorpus of Anglo-Saxon and the Brayford Pool and Medieval Pottery from Lincoln Vince and Alan Jane Young No. 3 No. 8 with Victoria Nailor The Archaeology of The Upper City A Corpus of Roman Glass and Adjacent Suburbs from Lincoln No. 4 No. 9 The Archaeology of The Lower City Finds from the Well and Adjacent Suburbs at St Paul-in-the-Bail No. 5 No. 10 Of Butchers and Breeds The City by the Pool Jane Young and Alan Vince with Victoria Nailor Oxbow Books LINCOLN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES NO. 7 A Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Pottery from Lincoln ii iii LINCOLN ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES NO. 7 GENERAL EDITORS: MICHAEL J. JONES AND ALAN VINCE A Corpus of Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Pottery from Lincoln Jane Young and Alan Vince, with Victoria Nailor Oxbow Books Published by Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK © Jane Young, Alan Vince and Victoria Nailor 2005 ISBN 978-1-84217-083-0 A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library This book is published with the aid of a grant from English Heritage. English Heritage is now Historic England This book is available to download from http://books.casematepublishing.com/A_Corpus_of_Anglo-Saxon_and_Medieval_Pottery_from_Lincoln.pdf Front cover photo by George Jacklin Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harold's House, Portskewett, Monmouthshire, South Wales
    Wessex Archaeology Harold’s House, Portskewett, Monmouthshire, South Wales Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Ref: 65301.01 June 2007 Harold’s House, Portskewett, Monmouthshire, South Wales Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Prepared on behalf of Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON W12 8QP By Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB Report reference: 65301.01 June 2007 © Wessex Archaeology Limited 2007, all rights reserved Wessex Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No. 287786 Harold’s House, Portskewett, Monmouthshire, South Wales Archaeological Evaluation and Assessment of Results Contents Summary Acknowledgements 1 BACKGROUND..................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction................................................................................................1 1.2 Site Location, Topography and Geology..................................................1 1.3 Archaeological Background......................................................................2 Neolithic and Bronze Age ............................................................................2 Iron Age........................................................................................................2 Romano-British ............................................................................................2 Early Medieval.............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • An Early 19Th-Century Tile Kiln, with Early Post-Medieval Occupation and Medieval Activity at the Former Queen’S Head Public House, Marrowbrook Lane, Farnborough
    Proc. Hampshire Field Club Archaeol. Soc. 67 (pt. II), 2012, 379–399 (Hampshire Studies 2012) AN EARLY 19TH-CENTURY TILE KILN, WITH EARLY POST-MEDIEVAL OCCUPATION AND MEDIEVAL ACTIVITY AT THE FORMER QUEEN’S HEAD PUBLIC HOUSE, MARROWBROOK LANE, FARNBOROUGH By ANDY TAYLOR with contributions by PAUL BLINKHORN, ROZ MCKENNA, DANIELLE MILBANK and GEOQUEST ASSOCIATES ABSTRACT (Hopkins 2009). In general, archaeologi- cal finds and deposits are rare in the area. An excavation, prior to re-development of the site, However, the significant exception is the identified medieval activity along with early post- presence of late medieval and post-medieval medieval features containing pottery production pottery production at several sites in Cove, waste and the remnants of a kiln. The site lies in a including a dump of pottery wasters indicating part of Hampshire which, along with adjacent areas a late 17th-century kiln at Romayne Close (SU of Surrey, is noted for the production of ‘Border Ware’ 863562) and more wasters again suggesting a pottery in post-medieval times. However, although 17th-century kiln at the Alma public house (SU pottery was undoubtedly produced at or near the site 859555). Physical remains of a kiln (probably in both the 16th and 18th/19th centuries, the kiln dating from the 19th or even 20th century) structure, archaeomagnetically dated to the early were excavated at Arrow Road (SU 857547). 19th century, was almost certainly primarily for the Nineteenth-century maps show several kilns all production of brick or tile. very close to the site, including two on adjacent plots of land. One of these, immediately north of the site, was excavated in 1981, when the INTRODUCTION floor of the kiln and large quantities of pottery were recorded (AHBR reference 28629), while Archaeological excavation was carried out a 1973 excavation at the other, immediately to between 20th July and 5th August 2009 by the west, revealed a ditch containing kiln waste Thames Valley Archaeological Services Ltd at (AHBR ref.
    [Show full text]