DOCSLIB.ORG

New York Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads …

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New York Rail Fast Facts for 2019 Freight Railroads … Freight Railroads in New York Rail Fast Facts For 2019 Freight railroads ….............................................................................................................................................................41 Freight railroad mileage …..........................................................................................................................................3,687 Freight rail employees …...............................................................................................................................................2,645 Average wages & benefits per employee …...................................................................................................$125,240 Railroad retirement beneficiaries …......................................................................................................................20,600 Railroad retirement benefits paid ….....................................................................................................................$525 million U.S. Economy: According to a Towson University study, in 2017, America's Class I railroads supported: Sustainability: Railroads are the most fuel efficient way to move freight over land. It would have taken approximately 3.7 million additional trucks to handle the 66.7 million tons of freight that moved by rail in New York in 2019. Rail Traffic Originated in 2019 Total Tons: 10.4 million Total Carloads: 201,000 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Waste and Scrap 3.7 39,900 Nonmetallic Minerals 2.1 20,500 Chemicals 1.4 14,300 Intermodal 1.3 97,300 Pulp and Paper 0.5 6,200 Other 1.4 22,700 Source: AAR analysis of industry data Pulp and Paper 5% (% based on tonnage) Rail Traffic Terminated in 2019 Total Tons: 17.8 million Total Carloads: 314,900 Commodity Tons (mil) Carloads Chemicals 2.8 29,700 Food Products 2.7 27,900 Farm Products 2.0 19,600 Nonmetallic Minerals 2.0 19,000 Chemicals Intermodal 1.6 116,300 16% Other 6.7 102,400 Other Source: AAR analysis of industry data 38% (% based on tonnage) © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021 Freight Railroads in New York Miles Operated In New York Miles Operated New York in 2019 2019 Totals Number Excluding Including Class I Railroads of Freight Trackage Trackage Canadian National 220 Railroads Rights Rights Canadian Pacific Railway 413 CSX Transportation 1,275 Class I 4 1,896 2,747 Norfolk Southern Corp. 839 Regional 5 332 490 2,747 Short Line 31 1,457 1,572 Regional Railroads Total 41 3,687 4,812 Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad 101 New York, Susquehanna & Western 306 Pan Am Railways 1 Miles Operated In Pan Am Southern 70 New York in 2019 Providence and Worcester Railroad 12 Short Line Railroads, cont. 490 Mohawk, Adirondack & Northern Railroad 124 Short Line Railroads New York & Atlantic Railway 270 Albany Port Railroad 10 New York & Lake Erie Railroad 35 Arcade & Attica Railroad 15 New York & Ogdensburg Railroad 28 B&H Rail Corp. 47 New York New Jersey Rail 4 Batten Kill Railroad 35 Ontario Central Railroad 13 Brookhaven Rail 3 Ontario Midland Railroad 47 Buffalo Southern Railroad 32 R.J. Corman Railroad - Owego & Harford Line 27 Central New York Railroadoration 81 Rochester & Southern Railroad 166 Clarendon & Pittsford Railway 19 SMS Rail Lines of New York 25 Depew, Lancaster & Western Railroad 14 South Brooklyn Railway 1 Falls Road Railroad 42 South Buffalo Railway 54 Finger Lakes Railway 144 Vermont Railway 4 Housatonic Railroad 41 Wellsboro & Corning Railroad 13 Ithaca Central Railroad 47 Western New York & Pennsylvania Railroad 127 Livonia, Avon & Lakeville Railroad 32 1,504 Massena Terminal Railroad 4 Middletown and New Jersey Railway 68 Class I Railroad: A railroad with 2019 operating revenues of at least $504.8 million. Regional Railroad: A non-Class I line-haul railroad that has annual revenues of at least $40 million, or that operates at least 350 miles of road and revenues of at least $20 million. Short Line Railroad: A railroad which is neither a Class I nor a Regional Railroad. © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021 Freight Railroads in New York Amtrak KCS BNSF NS CN UP CP Short Line/Regional CSX Multiple Owners Map is based on the 2020 National Transportation Atlas Database published by the U.S. DOT, Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Some mileage figures are AAR estimates. © 1993–2021, Association of American Railroads. For more information about railroads, visit www.aar.org. Jan. 2021.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reporting Marks
    Lettres d'appellation / Reporting Marks AA Ann Arbor Railroad AALX Advanced Aromatics LP AAMX ACFA Arrendadora de Carros de Ferrocarril S.A. AAPV American Association of Private RR Car Owners Inc. AAR Association of American Railroads AATX Ampacet Corporation AB Akron and Barberton Cluster Railway Company ABB Akron and Barberton Belt Railroad Company ABBX Abbott Labs ABIX Anheuser-Busch Incorporated ABL Alameda Belt Line ABOX TTX Company ABRX AB Rail Investments Incorporated ABWX Asea Brown Boveri Incorporated AC Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACAX Honeywell International Incorporated ACBL American Commercial Barge Lines ACCX Consolidation Coal Company ACDX Honeywell International Incorporated ACEX Ace Cogeneration Company ACFX General Electric Rail Services Corporation ACGX Suburban Propane LP ACHX American Cyanamid Company ACIS Algoma Central Railway Incorporated ACIX Great Lakes Chemical Corporation ACJR Ashtabula Carson Jefferson Railroad Company ACJU American Coastal Lines Joint Venture Incorporated ACL CSX Transportation Incorporated ACLU Atlantic Container Line Limited ACLX American Car Line Company ACMX Voith Hydro Incorporated ACNU AKZO Chemie B V ACOU Associated Octel Company Limited ACPX Amoco Oil Company ACPZ American Concrete Products Company ACRX American Chrome and Chemicals Incorporated ACSU Atlantic Cargo Services AB ACSX Honeywell International Incorporated ACSZ American Carrier Equipment ACTU Associated Container Transport (Australia) Limited ACTX Honeywell International Incorporated ACUU Acugreen Limited ACWR
    [Show full text]
  • Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 Lb (129,844 Kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas
    Report No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 ▪ FINAL REPORT▪ August 2017 Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) Railcar Operational Status in Kansas Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D. Lisa Shofstall Kansas State University Transportation Center 1 Report No. 2 Government Accession No. 3 Recipient Catalog No. K-TRAN: KSU-16-5 4 Title and Subtitle 5 Report Date Class III / Short Line System Inventory to Determine 286,000 lb (129,844 kg) August 2017 Railcar Operational Status in Kansas 6 Performing Organization Code 7 Author(s) 7 Performing Organization Report Eric J. Fitzsimmons, Ph.D., Stacey Tucker-Kulesza, Ph.D., Lisa Shofstall No. 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10 Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Kansas State University Transportation Center Department of Civil Engineering 11 Contract or Grant No. 2109 Fiedler Hall C2069 Manhattan, Kansas 66506 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13 Type of Report and Period Kansas Department of Transportation Covered Bureau of Research Final Report 2300 SW Van Buren October 2015–December 2016 Topeka, Kansas 66611-1195 14 Sponsoring Agency Code RE-0691-01 15 Supplementary Notes For more information write to address in block 9. The rail industry’s recent shift towards larger and heavier railcars has influenced Class III/short line railroad operation and track maintenance costs. Class III railroads earn less than $38.1 million in annual revenue and generally operate first and last leg shipping for their customers. In Kansas, Class III railroads operate approximately 40 percent of the roughly 2,800 miles (4,500 km) of rail; however, due to the current Class III track condition, they move lighter railcars at lower speeds than Class I railroads.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014
    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
    [Show full text]
  • Tec Associates 46 Sawyer Street South Portland, Maine 04106 Table of Contents
    VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR: Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) Grafton and Upton Railroad Company Housatonic Railroad Company Massachusetts Central Railroad Corporation Massachusetts Coastal Railroad New England Central Railroad Providence and Worcester Railroad Company For railroad rights-of-way in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1 JANUARY 2021 – 31 DECEMBER 2025 PREPARED BY: TEC ASSOCIATES 46 SAWYER STREET SOUTH PORTLAND, MAINE 04106 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF RAILROADS COVERED BY THIS PLAN 1 A. Railroads Operating Under This Plan 1 B. Variations from Basic Plan 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. GENERAL STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3 IV. INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 6 V. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY 8 A. Roadbed 9 B. Bridges 10 C. Culverts 10 D. Ditches 10 E. ROW Area Adjacent to the Shoulder 10 1. At-Grade (Level) Road Crossings 10 2. Railroad Signals and Switch Boxes 10 3. Inside Curves 10 F. Railroad Yards and Facilities 11 VI. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES 11 A. Mechanical Techniques 12 B. Herbicide Application 12 1. Weed Control 13 a. Preemergence Herbicide Program 14 b. Postemergence Herbicide Program 15 2. Brush Control 15 a. Foliar 15 b. Stem 15 c. Cut surface 16 3. Summation 16 C. Indirect Methods 16 VII. SENSITIVE AREAS 17 A. Identification and Location of Wells and Surface Water Supplies 18 B. Identification and Delineation of Wetlands 18 C. Field Procedure 20 1. Preparation 20 2. Boundary Establishment 20 3. Approval of Findings 20 D. Operational Strategies and Procedures 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS VIII. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATORS RELATIVE TO HERBICIDE USE 24 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 2016 Annual Report Genesee & Wyoming Inc.*owns or leases 122 freight railroads worldwide that are organized into 10 operating regions with approximately 7,300 employees and 3,000 customers. * The terms “Genesee & Wyoming,” “G&W,” “the company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer collectively to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies. Financial Highlights Years Ended December 31 (In thousands, except per share amounts) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Statement of Operations Data Operating revenues $874,916 $1,568,643 $1,639,012 $2,000,401 $2,001,527 Operating income 190,322 380,188 421,571 384,261 289,612 Net income 52,433 271,296 261,006 225,037 141,096 Net income attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. 48,058 269,157 260,755 225,037 141,137 Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Genesee & Wyoming Inc. common stockholders: Diluted earnings per common share (EPS) $1.02 $4.79 $4.58 $3.89 $2.42 Weighted average shares - Diluted 51,316 56,679 56,972 57,848 58,256 Balance Sheet Data as of Period End Total assets $5,226,115 $5,319,821 $5,595,753 $6,703,082 $7,634,958 Total debt 1,858,135 1,624,712 1,615,449 2,281,751 2,359,453 Total equity 1,500,462 2,149,070 2,357,980 2,519,461 3,187,121 Operating Revenues Operating Income Net Income Diluted Earnings ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) ($ In Millions) 421.61,2 Per Common Share 2 2,001.5 401.6 1 $2,000 2,000.4 $400 394.12 $275 271.3 $5.00 1 2 4.79 1 374.3 1 380.21 384.3 261.0 4.581 1,800 250 4.50 350 1,639.0 225.01 225 2 1 1,600 233.5 4.00 2 3.89 1,568.6 4.10 2 300 2 200 213.9 213.3 2 3.78 2 1,400 1 3.50 3.69 289.6 183.32 3.142 250 175 1,200 3.00 211.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.5: Freight Movement
    3.5 Freight Movement 3.5 Freight Movement A. INTRODUCTION This section describes the characteristics of the existing rail freight services and railroad operators in the project area. Also addressed is the relationship between those services and Build Alternative long-term operations. The study area contains several rail freight lines and yards that play key roles in the movement of goods to and from the Port of New York and New Jersey, the largest port on the east coast, as well as in the movement of goods vital to businesses and residents in multiple states. However, no long-term freight movement impacts are anticipated with the Build Alternative, and no mitigation measures will be required. B. SERVICE TYPES The following freight rail services are offered in the project area: • Containerized or “inter-modal” consists primarily of containers or Example of Doublestack Train with Maritime truck trailers moved on rail cars. Containers Intermodal rail traffic is considered the fastest growing rail freight market, and is anticipated to grow in the region between 3.9 and 5.6 percent annually through 2030, based on the NJTPA Freight System Performance Study (see Table 3.5-1). • Carload traffic consists of products that are typically moved in boxcars, hopper cars, tank cars, and special lumber cars over a long distance by rail, and then either transported directly by rail or Example of Carload Rail Traffic shifted to truck for delivery to more local customers. The characteristics of these commodities (e.g., bulk, heavy or over- dimensional) make rail the preferred option for long-distance movement.
    [Show full text]
  • CP's North American Rail
    2020_CP_NetworkMap_Large_Front_1.6_Final_LowRes.pdf 1 6/5/2020 8:24:47 AM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Lake CP Railway Mileage Between Cities Rail Industry Index Legend Athabasca AGR Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway ETR Essex Terminal Railway MNRR Minnesota Commercial Railway TCWR Twin Cities & Western Railroad CP Average scale y y y a AMTK Amtrak EXO EXO MRL Montana Rail Link Inc TPLC Toronto Port Lands Company t t y i i er e C on C r v APD Albany Port Railroad FEC Florida East Coast Railway NBR Northern & Bergen Railroad TPW Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway t oon y o ork éal t y t r 0 100 200 300 km r er Y a n t APM Montreal Port Authority FLR Fife Lake Railway NBSR New Brunswick Southern Railway TRR Torch River Rail CP trackage, haulage and commercial rights oit ago r k tland c ding on xico w r r r uébec innipeg Fort Nelson é APNC Appanoose County Community Railroad FMR Forty Mile Railroad NCR Nipissing Central Railway UP Union Pacic e ansas hi alga ancou egina as o dmon hunder B o o Q Det E F K M Minneapolis Mon Mont N Alba Buffalo C C P R Saint John S T T V W APR Alberta Prairie Railway Excursions GEXR Goderich-Exeter Railway NECR New England Central Railroad VAEX Vale Railway CP principal shortline connections Albany 689 2622 1092 792 2636 2702 1574 3518 1517 2965 234 147 3528 412 2150 691 2272 1373 552 3253 1792 BCR The British Columbia Railway Company GFR Grand Forks Railway NJT New Jersey Transit Rail Operations VIA Via Rail A BCRY Barrie-Collingwood Railway GJR Guelph Junction Railway NLR Northern Light Rail VTR
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf 2013 A-GFTC Long Range Plan 2035
    ADIRONDACK/ GLENS FALLS TRANSPORTATION COUNCIL Long Range Plan Update: 2035 November 12, 2013 Adirondack/Glens Falls Transportation Council 11 South St., Suite 203, Glens Falls, NY 12801 P: 518‐223‐0086 F: 518‐223‐0584 Web: www.agftc.org Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 1 Public Outreach and Input ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Planning Principles for A/GFTC ................................................................................................................................ 15 Demographic Trends ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Highways and Bridges .............................................................................................................................................. 22 Public Transportation .............................................................................................................................................. 34 Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities .................................................................................................................................... 41 Freight .....................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS
    New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN %FDFNCFS Table of CONTENTS Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the Author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the Federal Highway Administration. New Jersey Statewide FREIGHT PLAN Page left blank intentionally. Table of CONTENTS Acknowledgements The New Jersey Department of Transportation’s Division of Multimodal Services thanks the many organizations and individuals for their time and contribution in making this document possible. New Jersey Department of Transportation Nicole Minutoli Paul Truban Genevieve Clifton Himanshu Patel Andrew Ludasi New Jersey Freight Advisory Committee Calvin Edghill, FHWA Keith Skilton, FHWA Anne Strauss-Wieder, NJTPA Jakub Rowinski, NJTPA Ted Dahlburg, DVRPC Mike Ruane, DVRPC Bill Schiavi, SJTPO David Heller, SJTPO Steve Brown, PANYNJ Victoria Farr, PANYNJ Stephanie Molden, PANYNJ Alan Kearns, NJ TRANSIT Steve Mazur, SJTA Rodney Oglesby, CSX Rick Crawford, Norfolk Southern Michael Fesen, Norfolk Southern Jocelyn Hill, Conrail Adam Baginski, Conrail Kelvin MacKavanagh, New Jersey Short Line Railroad Association Brian Hare, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation David Rosenberg, New York State Department of Transportation Consultant Team Jennifer Grenier, WSP Stephen Chiaramonte, WSP Alan Meyers, WSP Carlos Bastida, WSP Joseph Bryan, WSP Sebastian Guerrero, WSP Debbie Hartman, WSP Ruchi Shrivastava, WSP Reed Sibley, WSP Scudder Smith, WSP Scott Parker, Jacobs Engineering Jayne Yost, Jacobs Engineering
    [Show full text]
  • MDOT Michigan State Rail Plan Tech Memo 2 Existing Conditions
    Technical Memorandum #2 March 2011 Prepared for: Prepared by: HNTB Corporation Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 2. Freight Rail System Profile ......................................................................................2 2.1. Overview ...........................................................................................................2 2.2. Class I Railroads ...............................................................................................2 2.3. Regional Railroads ............................................................................................6 2.4. Class III Shortline Railroads .............................................................................7 2.5. Switching & Terminal Railroads ....................................................................12 2.7. State Owned Railroads ...................................................................................16 2.8. Abandonments ................................................................................................18 2.10. International Border Crossings .....................................................................22 2.11. Ongoing Border Crossing Activities .............................................................24 2.12. Port Access Facilities ....................................................................................24 3. Freight Rail Traffic ................................................................................................25
    [Show full text]
  • Seneca Lake Guardian
    GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE April 2, 2018 at 1:30 pm Location: Legislative Chambers Committee members: Tim Dennis Chair, Jim Multer, Vice Chair, Carlie Chilson, Tim Cutler, Earle Gleason, Bonnie Percy Tim and Tim Cutler will sign the audit this month Approve minutes of the March meeting Public Comment o Joseph Campbell, President Seneca Lake Guardian Legislative Operations Tim Dennis – Resolution Opposing Waste-To-Energy Plant Proposed Fro Former Seneca Lake Army Depot Site. Elections – Robert Brechko/Amy Daines State Legislative update March Accomplishments April Objectives Soil & Water –Colby Petersen Program updates Cornell Cooperative Extension – Arlene Wilson Program updates IT – Tim Groth Help Desk calls Program updates County Clerk – Lois Hall Statistical summary DMV updates Clerk updates Clerk of the Legislature – Connie Hayes Nothing to report this month Personnel – Kerry Brennan Various Department updates Policy Discussions Continuing Education Resolution – Amending Resolution No. 129-18 Adopt 2018 Non-Union Salary Schedule County Administrator – Robert Lawton Recruit new Historian Various other activity updates EXECUTIVE SESSION – If needed SENECA LAKE GUARDIAN senecalakeguardian.org PO Box 333 Watkins Glen, NY 14891 [email protected] Know the Facts about the Trash Incinerator Plant Proposed for the Seneca Army Depot in Romulus NY. Sponsor: Circular enerG, Rochester company with no experience handling garbage or energy production, has proposed building a giant waste incinerator. Circular enerG was incorporated in January of 2017 and the names of the investors and officers are a secret. Property owner: The land is owned by Seneca Depot LLC, a subsidiary of Flaum Management. Seneca Depot LLC is promoting the project. Seneca Depot LLC shares a Rochester address with Circular enerG, Rochester developer David M.
    [Show full text]
  • INSIDE Strive to Provide an “Authentic” Experience While the Recognition Is Great, It Is for Our Visitors
    NEXT MEETING: July 18 Join us at Industry Depot for a NEWSLETTER OF THE ROCHESTER & GENESEE VALLEY RAILROAD MUSEUM ride on your museum railroad JULY 2013 VOL. 56 No. 11 Volunteer Depot Guide Jim Moore holds the door open for visitors touring Industry Depot and our museum displays. We strive to provide an authentic experience for our visitors, what else can we do to make someone’s visit special? PHOTO BY OTTO M. VONDRAK Keeping it Real “What is real?” That is a question that has right. More people are coming through the plagued philosophers for many years. door, and we would like to keep that trend As far as relating to our museum, we going as long as we can. INSIDE strive to provide an “authentic” experience While the recognition is great, it is for our visitors. That means train crews in important that we remain focused on our acceptable “period” uniforms for freight goals. We published a list of priority proj - Train Bulletin . 2 service employees. It means keeping our ects earlier this year that your board of facilities neat and clean and making a good trustees will be reviewing. Look for an first impression. Several visitors have update in these pages on how we’re doing. Museum News . 3 commented favorably about the recent Do you see areas we can improve? Is changes we have made, from less clutter in there something missing from our muse - Picnic Aug. 17 . 5 the depot, to expanded displays elsewhere. um? What can we do to keep people People are noticing our extra efforts.
    [Show full text]