DOCSLIB.ORG

Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble. The limited amount of parking at the station location and design analysis with the Transportation Company filed for bank- downtown locations should not be prob- primary objective of identifying the most fea- ruptcy. The HRRC proposal would once lematic as an overwhelming majority of sible and advantageous locations for passen- again make it possible for a passenger passengers using the service are projected ger rail stations along the Berkshire Line. boarding the passenger train at Grand Cen- to be traveling north to Berkshire County Other objectives of this study include devel- tral Station in New York City to reach Pitts- and will not have a need for parking. In oping recommendations for passenger rail field, Massachusetts by train in approxi- addition, the passenger rail stations pro- station design, facilities and amenities; eval- mately four (4) hours and vice versa. For posed for the City of Pittsfield and the uating and refining the preliminary railroad the HRRC proposal to become reality, a sig- Town of Sheffield (if one is constructed) operations analysis; and assessing the poten- nificant capital investment in Massachu- are recommended to function as larger tial economic, environmental, land use and setts, Connecticut and New York will need regional stations and will provide more community benefits and impacts of the pro- to be made to upgrade the rail infrastruc- parking for southbound passengers. Only posed passenger rail service and the recom- ture along the Berkshire Line. Massachu- when no feasible location can be found in a mended passenger rail station locations. setts has made an initial commitment to the downtown areas does BRPC support the Funding for this study was provided project by entering into an agreement to construction of a passenger rail station out- through a Transportation, Community and acquire the Berkshire Line from HRRC and side of the mixed use downtown areas un- Systems Preservation Grant awarded to the committing $35 million dollars to upgrade less operational needs dictate otherwise. BRPC by the U.S. Department of Transporta- the rail infrastructure. Connecticut has not Stations located outside of downtown are- tion. yet made a commitment, but discussions as would likely diminish the economic are underway between the state and HRRC. benefit to the communities, and severely The development of the passenger rail sta- diminish the potential for the proposed tion location recommendations follow the The majority of the existing rail infrastruc- passenger rail service to provide intra- Sustainable Development Principles of the ture is nearly a century old in both Con- county transportation for residents and Commonwealth of Massachusetts and smart necticut and Massachusetts. The worn out visitors. growth principles and principles from Sus- jointed rails and ties are not suitable for the tainable Berkshires (the regional plan for safe operation of a passenger rail service Berkshire County). In accordance with these and must be replaced. Another essential principles, a conscious effort was made to component of the rail infrastructure are the identify passenger rail station locations in passenger rail stations. The ideal passenger mixed use downtown areas that have exist- rail station will meet the needs of the com- ing pedestrian connectivity and existing munity, the needs of the region and the op- commercial establishments that would bene- erational needs of the proposed passenger fit from a passenger rail station. The most BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Summary of Key Findings Joseph Scelsi Intermodal Transportation Center Sheffield may be an ideal location for a passen- 11. The attendees at the public meetings and re- 1. The rail infrastructure along the Berkshire ger rail station to serve Sheffield and north- spondents to the online survey identified prior- Line needs total replacement. All of the near- western Connecticut if a passenger rail station ities for the types of amenities and services ly century old existing jointed rail and ties need is not located in North Canaan, Connecticut. A offered at a Berkshire passenger rail station. to be replaced with new ties and welded rail. passenger rail station in both locations would Strong pedestrian connectivity around a pas- The at-grade public crossings require safety not allow the passenger rail service to operate senger rail station was indicated as a top priori- upgrades and passenger rail stations need to be efficiently and is not recommended. HRRC ty. The convenience of ticket purchasing and retrofitted or built new. The estimated total cost owns a ten (10) acre site (State Line) in this access to and from the passenger rail station of the rail infrastructure improvements in both area that is recommended for use as a passen- were also identified as top priorities by Connecticut and Massachusetts exceeds $200 ger rail station. attendees/respondents. million dollars. 8. A passenger rail station is not recommended 12. Further refinement of the 2010 Market Street 2. With input from HRRC, the ideal minimum for the Town of Lenox because it is located Research (MSR) marketing study suggests that spacing between stations was determined to within ten (10) miles of the City of Pittsfield over a five (5) year period annual ridership 5. A new passenger rail station to be constructed be ten (10) miles apart for the passenger rail and the rail corridor passes through the less between Berkshire County and points south on the west side of the downtown area on service to operate efficiently. densely developed area of the town. Lenox will increase to 1,086,874 one-way fares per Railroad Street is the recommended location residents will have access to the passenger rail year. 3. Initial passenger rail stations are recommend- for a passenger rail station in the Town of Lee. service at the Pittsfield station or the Lee sta- ed for the City of Pittsfield, the Town of Lee A new passenger rail station in this location is tion. 13. The MSR marketing study suggests that peak and the Town of Great Barrington. Passenger expected to serve the needs of the local commu- demand for the passenger rail service will be rail stations located in these locations will best nity, support existing commercial establish- 9. A passenger rail station is not recommended on weekends in the summer months as a large serve the needs of the region and the operation- ments in the downtown area, further economic for the Town of Stockbridge because it is lo- majority of the passengers traveling to Berk- al needs of the proposed passenger rail service. development, and facilitate intra-county trans- cated within ten (10) miles of Great Barring- shire County will be visitors as opposed to portation. Two possible scenarios are provided ton and the potential for additional economic commuters. The MSR marketing study also 4. The Joseph Scelsi Intermodal Transportation in this report. development in areas adjacent to the potential showed demand in the fall and winter months Center on Columbus Avenue is the recom- passenger rail station locations is not as great as well. mended location for a regional passenger rail 6. The reuse of the existing historic passenger as the other communities. Stockbridge resi- station in the City of Pittsfield. A passenger rail station site in the downtown area on Cas- dents will have access to the passenger rail ser- 14. The MSR marketing study suggests that travel rail
Recommended publications
  • 2011 at a Glance Nonprofit Org

    2011 at a Glance Nonprofit Org

    FINANCIAL REPORT 2011 AT A GLANCE NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION, INC. AND HVA FOUNDATION, INC. The Housatonic Valley Association’s mission is to save the PAID PERMIT NO. 19 natural character and environmental health of our communities by CORNWALL BRIDGE HVA CONNECTICUT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT protecting land and water in the Housatonic River valley. Cornwall Bridge, CT 06754-0028 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 OF FINANCIAL POSITION JUNE 30, 2011 How we spent our THE HOUSATONIC WATERSHED TEMPORARILY PERMANENTLY ASSETS resources UNRESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED TOTAL Current Assets Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 237,257 SUPPORT AND REVENUE Accounts Receivable 94,345 Membership Dues $ 52,294 $ - $ - $ 52,294 Prepaid Expenses 7,050 Massachusetts Contributions Above Dues 247,138 - - 247,138 __________ Grants 266,936 44,900 - 311,836 22% Total Current Assets __________338,652 HVA STAFF Events 191,462 - - 191,462 LAND PROTECTION Fees 21,169 - - 21,169 Lynn Werner BARON DAVID Executive Director Rent 10,292 - - 10,292 30% Investment Income 4,523 20,701 - 25,224 Property and Equipment MASSACHUSETTS Dennis Regan Donated Goods and Services 8,736 - - 8,736 Land 216,206 WATER Buildings and Renovations 306,414 Berkshire Program Director Unrealized Gains on Investments 51,718 99,294 - 151,012 PROTECTION Northern Furnishings and Equipment 166,848 ADMINISTRATIVE/ Alison Dixon Net Assets Release From Restrictions _________78,646 ___________(78,646)
  • BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION and GROWTH Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Prospectus Local Authorities As Well As Other Key Stakeholders

    BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION and GROWTH Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Prospectus Local Authorities As Well As Other Key Stakeholders

    BERKSHIRE PROSPECTUS AMBITION, COLLABORATION AND GROWTH 02 THE BERKSHIRE Berkshire Prospectus Berkshire PROSPECTUS THE OPPORTUNITIES IN THIS PROSPECTUS It is no coincidence that this prospectus for Berkshire has been released in tandem with the Thames Valley Berkshire Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP) Recovery and REPRESENT A CHANCE Renewal Plan. The two documents sit alongside each other, evidencing the formidable collaborative nature of how TO RESET POST COVID the LEP is working in partnership with the six Berkshire Local Authorities as well as other key stakeholders. AND MAKE BERKSHIRE This prospectus clearly identifies several key schemes and projects which, when delivered, will greatly enhance Berkshire’s appeal as a place to live and EVEN BETTER work in the years ahead. The projects highlighted in this prospectus represent unique opportunities for new investment that will appeal to a wide range of partners, locally, regionally and nationally. The LEP and Local Authorities will work alongside private and public sector colleagues to facilitate the development and successful delivery of these great opportunities. COLLABORATIVE WORKING We should highlight the constructive partnership between the Local Authorities and the LEP, who together have forged a great working relationship with One Public Estate (OPE). Established in 2013, OPE now works nationally with more than 300 councils.These projects are transforming local communities and public services right across the country. They provide technical support and funding to councils to deliver ambitious property and place-focused programmes in collaboration with central government and other public sector partners. Thames Valley Berkshire LEP Berkshire Thames Valley 03 As highlighted in the Recovery and Renewal Plan, Thames Valley Berkshire is more than the sum of its parts.
  • VISION Barnstable Berkshire Bristol Dukes Essex Franklin

    VISION Barnstable Berkshire Bristol Dukes Essex Franklin

    Massachusetts Division of Insurance Annual Report Membership in VISION Insured Preferred Provider Plans by County as of December 31, 2006 VISION Barnstable Berkshire Bristol Dukes Essex Franklin Hampden Hampshire Middlesex Nantucket Norfolk Plymouth Suffolk Worcester MA 1 Insured Preferred Provider Plan Members Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Members at Total 2006 By County End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 End of 2006 Members 2 1 AIG Life Insurance Company 000000000000000 2 (The) Chesapeake Life Insurance Company 000000000010001 3 Columbian Life Insurance Company 0 0 0 13 106 0 0 0 216 0 90 16 41 76 558 4 Combined Insurance Company of America 48 20 422 0 1,288 351 290 246 2,964 0 1,498 422 800 1,417 9,766 5 Connecticut General Life Insurance Company 000000000000000 6 Fidelity Security Insurance Company 169 16 907 6 725 405 665 2,234 2,093 0 2,791 1,503 1,332 1,793 14,639 7 (The) Guardian Life Insurance Company of America 117 0 0 0 160 11 0 9 2,221 0 1,026 0 639 353 4,536 8 Massachusetts Vision Service Plan, Inc. 0 2,860 2,240 83 11,308 0 1,109 279 101,555 0 16,472 3,428 45,968 1,931 187,233 9 (The) MEGA Life and Health Insurance Company 298 96 385 30 563 71 223 107 992 45 472 354 329 371 4,336 10 Mid-West Life Insurance Company of Tennessee 618 47 290 27 656 44 131 71 968 30 408 426 188 470 4,374 11 National Union Fire Insurance Co.
  • Chanukah Cooking with Chef Michael Solomonov of the World

    Chanukah Cooking with Chef Michael Solomonov of the World

    Non-Profit Org. U.S. POSTAGE PAID Pittsfield, MA Berkshire Permit No. 19 JEWISHA publication of the Jewish Federation of the Berkshires, serving V the Berkshires and surrounding ICE NY, CT and VT Vol. 28, No. 9 Kislev/Tevet 5781 November 23 to December 31, 2020 jewishberkshires.org Chanukah Cooking with Chef The Gifts of Chanukah Michael Solomonov of the May being more in each other’s presence be among World-Famous Restaurant Zahav our holiday presents On Wednesday, December 2 at 8 p.m., join Michael Solomonov, execu- tive chef and co-owner of Zahav – 2019 James Beard Foundation award winner for Outstanding Restaurant – to learn to make Apple Shrub, Abe Fisher’s Potato Latkes, Roman Artichokes with Arugula and Olive Oil, Poached Salmon, and Sfenj with Cinnamon and Sugar. Register for this live virtual event at www.tinyurl.com/FedCooks. The event link, password, recipes, and ingredient list will be sent before the event. Chef Michael Solomonov was born in G’nai Yehuda, Israel, and raised in Pittsburgh. At the age of 18, he returned to Israel with no Hebrew language skills, taking the only job he could get – working in a bakery – and his culinary career was born. Chef Solomonov is a beloved cham- pion of Israel’s extraordinarily diverse and vibrant culinary landscape. Chef Michael Solomonov Along with Zahav in Philadelphia, Solomonov’s village of restaurants include Federal Donuts, Dizengoff, Abe Inside Fisher, and Goldie. In July of 2019, Solomonov brought BJV Voluntary Subscriptions at an another significant slice of Israeli food All-Time High! .............................................2 culture to Philadelphia with K’Far, an Distanced Holidays? Been There, Israeli bakery and café.
  • Tec Associates 46 Sawyer Street South Portland, Maine 04106 Table of Contents

    Tec Associates 46 Sawyer Street South Portland, Maine 04106 Table of Contents

    VEGETATION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR: Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation) Grafton and Upton Railroad Company Housatonic Railroad Company Massachusetts Central Railroad Corporation Massachusetts Coastal Railroad New England Central Railroad Providence and Worcester Railroad Company For railroad rights-of-way in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts 1 JANUARY 2021 – 31 DECEMBER 2025 PREPARED BY: TEC ASSOCIATES 46 SAWYER STREET SOUTH PORTLAND, MAINE 04106 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SUMMARY OF RAILROADS COVERED BY THIS PLAN 1 A. Railroads Operating Under This Plan 1 B. Variations from Basic Plan 1 II. INTRODUCTION 1 III. GENERAL STATEMENT OF GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 3 IV. INTEGRATED VEGETATION MANAGEMENT 6 V. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS OF RAILROAD RIGHTS-OF-WAY 8 A. Roadbed 9 B. Bridges 10 C. Culverts 10 D. Ditches 10 E. ROW Area Adjacent to the Shoulder 10 1. At-Grade (Level) Road Crossings 10 2. Railroad Signals and Switch Boxes 10 3. Inside Curves 10 F. Railroad Yards and Facilities 11 VI. VEGETATION MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES 11 A. Mechanical Techniques 12 B. Herbicide Application 12 1. Weed Control 13 a. Preemergence Herbicide Program 14 b. Postemergence Herbicide Program 15 2. Brush Control 15 a. Foliar 15 b. Stem 15 c. Cut surface 16 3. Summation 16 C. Indirect Methods 16 VII. SENSITIVE AREAS 17 A. Identification and Location of Wells and Surface Water Supplies 18 B. Identification and Delineation of Wetlands 18 C. Field Procedure 20 1. Preparation 20 2. Boundary Establishment 20 3. Approval of Findings 20 D. Operational Strategies and Procedures 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS VIII. OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATORS RELATIVE TO HERBICIDE USE 24 A.
  • Designation of the Upper Housatonic River As Area Of

    Designation of the Upper Housatonic River As Area Of

    Upper Housatonic River Page 1 of 1 The Official Website of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Energy and Environmental Affairs EEA Home Agencies Department of Conservation and Recreation Conservation ACEC Upper Housatonic River Upper Housatonic River Designation Date: 03/30/09 Total Approximate Acreage: 12,280 acres Watershed(s): Housatonic River Municipalities (acres; % of ACEC): approximately 1,614 acres in Lee (13% of the ACEC), 3,517 acres in Lenox (29%), 3,166 acres in Pittsfield (26%), and 3,978 acres in Washington (32%). Resource Summary The Upper Housatonic River Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) encompasses the 13-mile corridor of the Housatonic River from southern Pittsfield to northern Lee, and portions of the supporting watersheds that drain into the river from the east and west. This section of the Housatonic River includes a complex ecosystem of the river, adjacent Documents wetlands and floodplains, coldwater tributary streams, large expanses of wildlife and rare species habitat, and the steep, Designation Upper Housatonic River forested, western slopes of October Mountain State Forest. There are also historical and archaeological resources, ACEC 1MB farmland and open space, and scenic and recreational areas. The ACEC includes all nine of the inland resource features listed in the ACEC Regulations - including fisheries, wetlands and surface waters, water supply areas, floodplains and steep slopes, agricultural and forested areas, historical and archaeological resources, wildlife and rare species habitats, Maps and public recreational and natural areas. Housatonic River Area of Critical The regionally significant biodiversity and wildlife habitat in the designated area is indicated by the exceptional number of Environmental Concern 2MB rare species (32), Certified and Potential Vernal Pools (46), and the combined total of 11,405 acres or 93% of the area delineated as viable habitat by the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s (DFW) Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP).
  • Weekend Getaways to Berkshires, MA from Boston Or New York | Fodor's

    Weekend Getaways to Berkshires, MA from Boston Or New York | Fodor's

    Arts and Culture Weekend Getaway in the Berkshire Mountains Distance from New York City: 169 miles Best time: May to November Best for: Girl's GetawayArts and CultureFood and Wine It's little wonder that culture hounds makes their way to Western Massachusetts each summer. The hamlets nestled in the Berkshire Mountains are blessed with terrific art, music, theater, and antiquing. Here, eight museums join renowned stage productions and dance festivals, plus a little music venue called Tanglewood. All that, plus a gorgeous natural setting of mountains and meadows—accessible on foot, bike, raft, balloon, horse, or even llama—is enough to uplift spirits. And there's no shortage of spas here, in the event you need extra help working out the kinks. –By Lisa Oppenheimer Friday The Berkshire Mountains Cheat Sheet View a printable list of all sights, restaurants, entertainment, and hotels from this itinerary. View 1. Get your bearings by venturing into Downtown Lenox. Poke your head in and around the shops and galleries located along the main thoroughfares of Main, Franklin, Church, and West streets. 2. Enjoy a lovely dinner in the outdoor courtyard of Cafe Lucia, a Berkshires favorite that's been dishing up Italian specialties based on local ingredients for the last three decades. 3. In season, there's nothing more soothing than al fresco entertainment on the historic grounds of Tanglewood. (Even with no show on, it's still worth visiting to experience the setting.) Classical greats perform at the Koussevitzky Shed, while smaller shows go on at the newer Ozawa Hall. Economical lawn seats are almost always available on the fly except during big events such as James Taylor nights.
  • Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS an OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT

    Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS an OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT

    Development News Highlights MANHATTAN - MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 PLUS AN OUTER BOROUGH SNAPSHOT Pictured: 315 Meserole Street Looking Ahead U.S. Treasury Releases Additional Opportunity Zones Guidelines On April 17th the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a highly anticipated second set of proposed regulations related to the new Opportunity Zone (OZ) tax incentive. Created by the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, the tax benefi t is designed to drive economic development and create jobs by encouraging long-term investments in economically distressed communities nationwide according to the Treasury department’s press release. The latest 169-page release reportedly delivered guidance in a broader range of areas than many expected, hoping to provide investors who have been on the fence with the clarity needed to begin developing projects in distressed areas nationwide. Some government offi cials anticipate the program could spur $100 billion in new investment into the more than 8,762 zones nationwide, of which 306 are located in New York City; however there exist some concerns among critics that the program will incentivize gentrifi cation, or provide added benefi t to developers for projects they would have been pursued anyway. According to the press release by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), a key part of the newly released guidance clarifi es the “substantially all” requirements for the holding period and use of the tangible business property: • For use of the property, at least 70% of the property must be used in a qualifi ed OZ. • For the holding period of the property, tangible property must be qualifi ed opportunity zone business property for at least 90% of the Qualifi ed Opportunity Fund’s (QOF) or qualifi ed OZ business’s holding period.
  • Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting

    Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting

    Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting March 2019 Members S. Metzger N. Brown R. Glucksman C. Moerdler M. Pally A. Saul V. Vanterpool N. Zuckerman Metro-North Railroad Committee Meeting 2 Broadway 20th Floor Board Room New York, NY Monday, 3/25/2019 8:30 - 9:30 AM ET 1. Public Comments 2. Approval of Minutes Minutes - Page 4 3. 2019 Work Plan 2019 MNR Work Plan - Page 14 4. President's Reports Safety MNR Safety Report - Page 22 MTA Police Report MTA Police Report - Page 25 5. Information Items MNR Information Items - Page 31 Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies Annual Strategic Investments & Planning Studies - Page 32 Annual Elevator & Escalator Report Annual Elevator & Escalator Report - Page 66 Customer Satisfaction Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Results - Page 74 PTC Status Report PTC Status Report - Page 122 Lease Agreement for Hastings Station Lease Agreement for Hastings Station - Page 133 License agreement for Purdy's Station License Agreement for Purdy's Station - Page 135 6. Procurements MNR Procurements - Page 137 MNR Non-Competitive Procurements MNR Non-Competitive Procurements - Page 140 MNR Competitive Procurements MNR Competitive Procurements - Page 142 7. Operations Report MNR Operations Report - Page 149 8. Financial Report MNR Finance Report - Page 160 9. Ridership Report MNR Ridership Report - Page 181 10. Capital Program Report MNR Capital Program Report - Page 192 Next Meeting: Joint meeting with Long Island on Monday, April 15th @ 8:30 a.m. Minutes of the Regular Meeting Metro-North Committee Monday, February 25, 2019 Meeting held at 2 Broadway – 20th Floor New York, New York 10004 8:30 a.m.
  • Concord Coach (NH) O Dartmouth Coach (NH) O Peter Pan Bus Lines (MA)

    Concord Coach (NH) O Dartmouth Coach (NH) O Peter Pan Bus Lines (MA)

    KFH GROUP, INC. 2012 Vermont Public Transit Policy Plan INTERCITY BUS NEEDS ASSESSMENT AND POLICY OPTIONS White Paper January, 2012 Prepared for the: State of Vermont Agency of Transportation 4920 Elm Street, Suite 350 —Bethesda, MD 20814 —(301) 951-8660—FAX (301) 951-0026 Table of Contents Page Chapter 1: Background and Policy Context......................................................................... 1-1 Policy Context...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Chapter 2: Inventory of Existing Intercity Passenger Services.......................................... 2-1 Intercity Bus......................................................................................................................... 2-1 Impacts of the Loss of Rural Intercity Bus Service......................................................... 2-8 Intercity Passenger Rail.................................................................................................... 2-11 Regional Transit Connections ......................................................................................... 2-11 Conclusions........................................................................................................................ 2-13 Chapter 3: Analysis of Intercity Bus Service Needs............................................................ 3-1 Demographic Analysis of Intercity Bus Needs............................................................... 3-1 Public Input on Transit Needs .......................................................................................
  • Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements

    Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements

    Brewster Yard & Southeast Station and Parking Improvements Capital Engineering - Shops and Yards & Strategic Facilities Date: February 2020 Metro-North Railroad Program Goals: Brewster Yard & Southeast Station Parking Improvements Currently Brewster train yard is at capacity and cannot accommodate the future fleet and operations required to support Metro-North (MNR) Harlem Line long-term ridership growth. MNR sets forth to accomplish the following goals to meet the demand: Relocate the existing Southeast Station parking into a new parking facility, east of the station within the Metro-North’s, 52-acre property: Improve customer service and traffic circulation with more convenient, expanded parking and intermodal access. Expand and modernize Brewster Yard to support long-term ridership growth: Extend the existing yard to the north into the current Southeast Parking footprint after the new parking facility is complete. Improve Southeast Station’s overpass, platform, and canopy to enhance its aesthetics, safety and amenities. 2 Three-Phased Program Approach Phase I Parking and Access Improvements Brewster Yard Station Improvements Phase II North Yard CONSTRUCTION / Construction MAINTENANCE ACCESS ROAD PEDSTRIAN ACCESS East Parcel Phase III South Yard Reconfiguration 3 PHASE I – Parking Facility, Access and Station Improvements Major project elements: Construct a new 1,000 plus - space garage to replace the existing surface parking lots at Southeast Station. Construct a new fly-over bridge that will connect Independent Way to the new parking facility. Extend the existing pedestrian overpass to the new parking facility. Pedestrian Access from the parking facility to the northern end of island platform is being planned; existing track curvature may have an impact.
  • Trains 2019 Index

    Trains 2019 Index

    INDEX TO VOLUME 79 Reproduction of any part of this volume for commercial pur poses is not allowed without the specific permission of the publishers. All contents © 2018 and 2019 by Kalmbach Media Co., Wau kesha, Wis. JANUARY 2019 THROUGH DECEMBER 2019 – 862 PAGES HOW TO USE THIS INDEX: Feature material has been indexed three or more times—once by the title under which it was published, again under the author’s last name, and finally under one or more of the subject categories or railroads. Photographs standing alone are indexed (usually by railroad), but photo graphs within a feature article are not separately indexed. Brief news items are indexed under the appropriate railroad and/or category; news stories are indexed under the appro- priate railroad and/or category and under the author’s last name. Most references to people are indexed under the company with which they are easily identified; if there is no easy identification, they may be indexed under the person’s last name (for deaths, see “Obi t uaries”). Maps, museums, radio frequencies, railroad historical societies, rosters of locomotives and equipment, product reviews, and stations are indexed under these categories. Items from countries other than the U.S. and Canada are indexed under the appropriate country. A Amtrak's elephant style, Ask TRAINS, Mar 62 Aiken Railway: Amtrak’s lost transcons, Jul 22-31 Once upon a time: Seaboard and Southern, Apr 51 Amtrak’s money mystery, Jan 50-55 A tale of two South Carolina short lines, Apr 46-53 At fault: train or track? Passenger, Nov