DOCSLIB.ORG

2011 at a Glance Nonprofit Org

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINANCIAL REPORT 2011 AT A GLANCE NONPROFIT ORG. U.S. POSTAGE HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION HOUSATONIC VALLEY ASSOCIATION, INC. AND HVA FOUNDATION, INC. The Housatonic Valley Association’s mission is to save the PAID PERMIT NO. 19 natural character and environmental health of our communities by CORNWALL BRIDGE HVA CONNECTICUT 2011 ANNUAL REPORT protecting land and water in the Housatonic River valley. Cornwall Bridge, CT 06754-0028 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 OF FINANCIAL POSITION JUNE 30, 2011 How we spent our THE HOUSATONIC WATERSHED TEMPORARILY PERMANENTLY ASSETS resources UNRESTRICTED RESTRICTED RESTRICTED TOTAL Current Assets Cash and Cash Equivalents $ 237,257 SUPPORT AND REVENUE Accounts Receivable 94,345 Membership Dues $ 52,294 $ - $ - $ 52,294 Prepaid Expenses 7,050 Massachusetts Contributions Above Dues 247,138 - - 247,138 __________ Grants 266,936 44,900 - 311,836 22% Total Current Assets __________338,652 HVA STAFF Events 191,462 - - 191,462 LAND PROTECTION Fees 21,169 - - 21,169 Lynn Werner BARON DAVID Executive Director Rent 10,292 - - 10,292 30% Investment Income 4,523 20,701 - 25,224 Property and Equipment MASSACHUSETTS Dennis Regan Donated Goods and Services 8,736 - - 8,736 Land 216,206 WATER Buildings and Renovations 306,414 Berkshire Program Director Unrealized Gains on Investments 51,718 99,294 - 151,012 PROTECTION Northern Furnishings and Equipment 166,848 ADMINISTRATIVE/ Alison Dixon Net Assets Release From Restrictions _________78,646 ___________(78,646) __________- ___________- Connecticut Outreach Program Manager* Less Accumulated Depreciation (373,923) FUNDRAISING __________ 22% CONNECTICUT LAND PROTECTION Total Support & Revenue __________932,914 ___________86,249 __________- ______1,019,163_____ 46% Elaine LaBella Net Property and Equipment 315,545 __________ 13% Land Protection Director Tim Abbott OUTREACH/ Greenprint Director EXPENSES EDUCATION Program Services Other Assets Sam Dzieken New York GIS Manager* Watch 115,908 - - 115,908 Investments, at Market 905,048 Geographic Information Systems 29,933 - - 29,933 Deferred Land Sale Costs ___________6,342 35% 13% CONNECTICUT/NEW YORK Environmental Education 311,795 - - 311,795 Total Other Assets ___________911,390 WATER PROTECTION Southern Meghan Ruta Land Protection 245,564 - - 245,564 TOTAL ASSETS ___________$1,565,587 Connecticut Water Protection Manager ___________ Connecticut Celebrating 70 Water Protection __________80,535 ___________- __________- ______80,535_____ Ron Skurat 19% Southern Housatonic Watershed Coordinator* years of working Total Program Services __________783,735 ___________- __________- ______783,735_____ LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS Tonia Shoumatoff Current Liabilities New York Watershed Manager* together for the COMMUNITY EDUCATION AND OUTREACH Supporting Services Accounts Payable $ 786 Accrued Salaries and Wages 7,034 Richard Sears Housatonic Membership 47,751 - - 47,751 Development Director Tenant’s Security Deposit 551 Events 88,884 - - 88,884 Jane Bakker River Valley! Management and General 33,754 - - 33,754 Equity Line ___________25,000 Development/Marketing Associate* Fundraising __________34,302 ___________- __________- _____34,302_____ TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES ___________33,371 Brenda Singer Membership/Volunteer Coordinator* Total Supporting Services 204,691 - - 204,691 __________ ___________ __________ ___________ Where we spent our resources FINANCIAL Net Assets Total Expenses 988,426 - - 988,426 Patience Lindholm __________ ___________ __________ __________ Unrestricted 488,120 Finance Director* Change in Net Assets (55,512) 86,249 - 30,737 Temporarily Restricted 144,205 Carol Powers __________ ___________ __________ ___________ Grants Consultant* Permanently Restricted ____________899,891 Tony Mitchell TOTAL NET ASSETS ___________1,532,216 www.hvatoday.org IT Specialist* Net Assets at Beginning of Year 543,632 57,956 899,891 1,501,479 __________ ___________ _________ __________ CT: P.O. Box 28, Cornwall Bridge, CT 06754 860-672-6678 E-mail: [email protected] *PARTTIME TOTAL LIABILITIES MA: P.O. Box 251, South Lee, MA 01260 413-394-9796 E-mail: [email protected] Net Assets at End of Year $__________ 488,120 $___________ 144,205 ___________$ 899,891 _____$1,532,216______ AND NET ASSETS ____________$1,565,587 __________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ____________ HVA NY: P.O. Box 315, Wassaic, NY 12592 845-879-1381 E-mail: [email protected]. STEVE HDC TO MEMBERS AND FRIENDS Special Thanks to our FOCUS ON WATER Special Thanks to our FOCUS ON LAND THANKS TO YOU AND OUR PARTNERS Project Sponsors Corporate Associates Board of Directors Aton Forest, Inc. A.E. Olsen Co., Inc. Alternative Support Program, Pittsfi eld Kent Bicycle Tours Pomperaug River Watershed Coalition Berkshire Life 1,600+ Service America School System King’s Mark RC&D Council Pootatuck Watershed Association President he Housatonic River fl exed its considerable muscle Berkshire Bank people celebrating the Advanced Alarms and Aquarion Water Company Kozuchowski Environmental Consultants Republican-American Robert P. Houlihan Berkshire Taconic Community The Asen Foundation Lake Housatonic Authority River Network Housatonic and HVA’s 70th Communications, Inc. Berkshire Environmental Action Team Lake Lillinonah Authority Rivers Alliance of Connecticut in 2011. Spring ice fl ows of historic proportions jammed Foundation Vice Presidents Aqua Environmental Lab Berkshire Natural Resources Council Lake Zoar Authority Rotary Club of New Milford Route 7 in South Kent, followed by record fl oods from The Bok Family Foundation birthday. Stephen Paul Booth Aquarion Company/BHC Borough of Naugatuck Laurel Hill Association Roxbury Conservation Commission snow melt and late summer storms Irene and Lee. Earth, Dennis and Pamela Collins Arch Street Communications, Inc. Branson Ultrasonics Litchfi eld High School Sharon Audubon Ellen M. Rosenberg Colebrook Land Bull’s Bridge Inn Legacy Banks Foundation Sharon Center School trees, roads and buildings were washed away with dispatch. The Becton-Dickinson Co. F. Anthony Zunino T Conservancy, Inc. Bennett Sullivan Associates Canaan Inland Wetlands Commission Litchfi eld Hills Council of Elected Offi cials Shelton Economic Development Corp. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Berkshire Enviro-Lab, Inc. Candlewood Lake Authority Littleville Power Co., Glendale Dam Shelton Land Trust Secretary lesson to be learned is to give rivers respect – and plenty of room! Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies Massachusetts Audubon Society Shepaug River Association Community Foundation of Greater Bicron Electronic Company Leendert T. DeJong Sharon Casdin Massachusetts Environmental Trust Sierra Club New Haven Borden Realtors Kevin Case Massachusetts Executive Offi ce of Energy Sikorsky Aircraft, Div. UTC Treasurer Yet almost on cue in late spring she allowed a tenacious group The Community Foundation of Bouvier Insurance City of Danbury and Environmental Affairs Ellerly Woods Sinclair Michael M. Nesbitt of paddlers to run from her source in Hinsdale, Massachusetts to Northwest Connecticut Brookside Inn City of Derby Massachusetts Fisheries and Wildlife Dr. Robert C. and Tina Sohn Foundation Connecticut Community Fnd. Bulls Bridge Body Shop City of Pittsfi eld National Oceanic Atmospheric Admin. Sound School Milford Point on Long Island Sound. In May we celebrated 70 Cornwall Conservation Trust Cornwall Foundation Southbury Land Trust Linda Allard Charter Business years of collaborative watershed stewardship. For 10 days we David L. Klein Jr. Foundation CLY-DEL Manufacturing Co. Cornwall Volunteer Fire Department Still River Alliance 98 Connecticut Audubon Coastal Center SPECIAL THANKS TO … Still River Cleanup Robert Bailey Dover Knolls Development Co. You protect miles of river and create four new river access sites. Con Serv, Inc. You conserve 170 riverfront acres and protect wildlife habitat and scenic views. guided people down river, stopping along the way for riverfront tributary miles surveyed or Connecticut BASS Federation Nation Marc and Jan Taylor William T. Baker Education Connection Cramer & Anderson Law Offi ce restored. Special Thanks to our Connecticut Chapter, AMC Auction guests, donors, bidders The Nature Conservancy Christine Baranski celebrations with more than 50 partners – environmental EPA/Water Quality Crane & Co., Inc. Connecticut Community Foundation and chairs: Christine Baranski, Thomaston Greenway Committee Joseph Ellis organizations and conservation groups, government leaders, ESS Group, Inc. Crystal Rock LLC Blue Herons Connecticut Department of Energy and Diane von Furstenberg, Annette and Thule, Inc. Protecting rivers Helping to organize the Naugatuck River Conserving riverfront land and trails Assisting Flanders Nature Center to create Shepley Evans Fairfi eld County D & P Floor Covering Environmental Protection Oscar de la Renta, Hamilton South, Town of Cornwall businesses and residents. What an amazing tribute to our collective Community Foundation Conserving 20 acres of undeveloped Housa- new conservation management plans. Connecticut Fund for the Environment Town of Lee Einar Lindholm Assessing/restoring 98 miles of Blackberry, Convocation – the fi rst watershed-wide David E. Lanque, Inc. Robert Couturier, Nancy Novogrod, achievements and to this magnifi cent river valley! This extra- Geoffrey C. Hughes Foundation DSA Companies Conn. Department of Transportation Town of Lenox Far Mill, Naugatuck, Shepaug, Still and gathering on economic and environmental
Recommended publications
  • Town of 2014-24 PLAN of CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

    Town of 2014-24 PLAN of CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT

    2014 Plan of Conservation & Development Town of 2014-24 PLAN OF CONSERVATION & DEVELOPMENT Town of New Fairfield PREPARED FOR: TOWN OF NEW FAIRFIELD PLANNING COMMISSION Acknowledgements BOARD OF SELECTMEN Susan Chapman, First Selectman Michael Gill, Selectman Kim Hanson, Selectman PLANNING COMMISSION Cynthia Ross-Zweig, Chair Lisa Deldin, Vice Chair Kirsten Bennett-O’Rourke Paul Bruno Peter Greco Ernie Lehman, Alternate Suzanne Kloos, Recording Secretary Lyn Sheaffer, Recording Secretary CONSULTANT Milone & MacBroom, Inc. Cheshire, CT Adopted: September 22, 2014 (Planning Commission) Effective: October 15, 2014 New Fairfield Plan of Conservation and Development (2014-24) I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 PUBLIC INPUT & COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS .......................................................................... 2 DEMOGRAPHICS ........................................................................................................................... 5 HOUSING ...................................................................................................................................... 21 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ...................................................................................................... 30 NATURAL RESOURCES, OPEN SPACE, PARKS, RECREATION & AGRICULTURE ...................... 46 COMMUNITY FACILITIES & INFRASTRUCTURE ...........................................................................
  • Western Connecticut Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy

    Western Connecticut Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy

    Western Connecticut Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy December 12, 2013 Western Connecticut Economic Development Alliance Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials Greater Danbury Chamber of Commerce Western Connecticut CEDS and Action Agenda Page i Western Connecticut Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy PROJECT TEAM With the assistance of many other individuals and organizations from the Western Connecticut region, the primary project team responsible for the preparation of this Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) and Action Agenda included: Connecticut Economic Resource Center Garnet Consulting Services, Inc. Greater Danbury Chamber of Commerce Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials Western Connecticut Economic Development Alliance ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Western Connecticut Economic Development Alliance would like to thank the following organizations for financially supporting the development of this Comprehensive Economic Development Strategy (CEDS) and Action Agenda: Commercial Brokers Alliance of Western Connecticut Cramer & Anderson Danbury Fair, Macerich Property Fairfield County Bank Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials MannKind Corporation Newtown Savings Bank Reynolds & Rowella Savings Bank of Danbury Union Savings Bank U.S. Economic Development Administration Western Connecticut Health Network Preparation of this CEDS and Action Agenda would not have been possible without the extensive participation of numerous volunteers, partner organizations, and elected leadership from
  • Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014

    Berkshire Passenger Rail Station Location and Design Analysis, Draft for Public Comment—August 2014

    BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAFT FOR PUBLIC COMMENT—AUGUST 2014 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Staff, Elected Officials, and Residents of the Berkshire Line Communities Karen Christensen and the Bring Back the Trains Campaign Bill Palmer, MassDOT Dustin Rhue, MassDOT Gary Sheppard, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority Bob Malnati, Berkshire Regional Transit Authority John R. Hanlon Jr., Housatonic Railroad Company Colin Pease, Housatonic Railroad Company Deborah Menette,Housatonic Railroad Company Berkshire Regional Planning Commission Nathaniel Karns, AICP, Executive Director Thomas Matuszko, AICP, Assistant Director Clete Kus, AICP, Transportation Manager Mark Maloy, GIS, Data and IT Manager Brian Domina, Senior Planner Patricia Mullins, Senior Planner Gwen Miller, Planner Jaclyn Pacejo, Planner BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This page intentionally left blank. BERKSHIRE PASSENGER RAIL STATION LOCATION AND DESIGN ANALYSIS Page 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive Summary rail service. In some instances, the nearly significant challenge in locating a passen- Map 1: Locus Map The Housatonic Railroad Company (HRRC) century old historic passenger rail stations ger rail station in a downtown area was has proposed re-establishing passenger rail may meet these needs and in other instances, finding sites with sufficient room for park- service between Danbury, Connecticut and new locations may better serve them. ing. Thus, for the recommended down- Pittsfield, Massachusetts on the former town passenger rail stations a smaller To address this issue, the Berkshire Regional Berkshire Line. The passenger rail service amount of parking, compared to a regional Planning Commission (BRPC) partnered between these two locations last operated passenger rail station, will likely be availa- with HRRC to conduct this passenger rail in 1971 shortly after the Penn Central ble.
  • Designation of the Upper Housatonic River As Area Of

    Designation of the Upper Housatonic River As Area Of

    Upper Housatonic River Page 1 of 1 The Official Website of the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Energy and Environmental Affairs EEA Home Agencies Department of Conservation and Recreation Conservation ACEC Upper Housatonic River Upper Housatonic River Designation Date: 03/30/09 Total Approximate Acreage: 12,280 acres Watershed(s): Housatonic River Municipalities (acres; % of ACEC): approximately 1,614 acres in Lee (13% of the ACEC), 3,517 acres in Lenox (29%), 3,166 acres in Pittsfield (26%), and 3,978 acres in Washington (32%). Resource Summary The Upper Housatonic River Area of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC) encompasses the 13-mile corridor of the Housatonic River from southern Pittsfield to northern Lee, and portions of the supporting watersheds that drain into the river from the east and west. This section of the Housatonic River includes a complex ecosystem of the river, adjacent Documents wetlands and floodplains, coldwater tributary streams, large expanses of wildlife and rare species habitat, and the steep, Designation Upper Housatonic River forested, western slopes of October Mountain State Forest. There are also historical and archaeological resources, ACEC 1MB farmland and open space, and scenic and recreational areas. The ACEC includes all nine of the inland resource features listed in the ACEC Regulations - including fisheries, wetlands and surface waters, water supply areas, floodplains and steep slopes, agricultural and forested areas, historical and archaeological resources, wildlife and rare species habitats, Maps and public recreational and natural areas. Housatonic River Area of Critical The regionally significant biodiversity and wildlife habitat in the designated area is indicated by the exceptional number of Environmental Concern 2MB rare species (32), Certified and Potential Vernal Pools (46), and the combined total of 11,405 acres or 93% of the area delineated as viable habitat by the Division of Fisheries and Wildlife’s (DFW) Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP).
  • Weekend Getaways to Berkshires, MA from Boston Or New York | Fodor's

    Weekend Getaways to Berkshires, MA from Boston Or New York | Fodor's

    Arts and Culture Weekend Getaway in the Berkshire Mountains Distance from New York City: 169 miles Best time: May to November Best for: Girl's GetawayArts and CultureFood and Wine It's little wonder that culture hounds makes their way to Western Massachusetts each summer. The hamlets nestled in the Berkshire Mountains are blessed with terrific art, music, theater, and antiquing. Here, eight museums join renowned stage productions and dance festivals, plus a little music venue called Tanglewood. All that, plus a gorgeous natural setting of mountains and meadows—accessible on foot, bike, raft, balloon, horse, or even llama—is enough to uplift spirits. And there's no shortage of spas here, in the event you need extra help working out the kinks. –By Lisa Oppenheimer Friday The Berkshire Mountains Cheat Sheet View a printable list of all sights, restaurants, entertainment, and hotels from this itinerary. View 1. Get your bearings by venturing into Downtown Lenox. Poke your head in and around the shops and galleries located along the main thoroughfares of Main, Franklin, Church, and West streets. 2. Enjoy a lovely dinner in the outdoor courtyard of Cafe Lucia, a Berkshires favorite that's been dishing up Italian specialties based on local ingredients for the last three decades. 3. In season, there's nothing more soothing than al fresco entertainment on the historic grounds of Tanglewood. (Even with no show on, it's still worth visiting to experience the setting.) Classical greats perform at the Koussevitzky Shed, while smaller shows go on at the newer Ozawa Hall. Economical lawn seats are almost always available on the fly except during big events such as James Taylor nights.
  • Final Amendment to the Restoration Plan

    Final Amendment to the Restoration Plan

    Final Amendment to the Housatonic River Basin Final Natural Resources Restoration Plan, Environmental Assessment, and Environmental Impact Evaluation for Connecticut May 2013 State of Connecticut, Department of Energy and Environmental Protection United States Fish and Wildlife Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 4 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS ................................................................................................ 7 2.1 No Action Alternative ........................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Proposed Preferred Alternative ............................................................................................. 7 2.2.1 Power Line Marsh Restoration ...................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Long Beach West Tidal Marsh Restoration ................................................................. 10 2.2.3 Pin Shop Pond Dam Removal...................................................................................... 12 2.2.4 Old Papermill Pond Dam Removal Feasibility Study ................................................. 15 2.2.5 Housatonic Watershed Habitat Continuity in Northwest Connecticut ........................ 18 2.2.6 Tingue Dam Fish Passage ...........................................................................................
  • Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report June 2006 Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report

    Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report June 2006 Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report

    Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report June 2006 Lower Housatonic and Lower Naugatuck Rivers Assessment Report Summary of Findings ......................................................................................................... 2 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 3 Overview Map of Survey Area ........................................................................................... 5 River Sections (Eastern and Western Shores) Section 1 (Oxford and Monroe) ............................................................................. 6 Section 2 (Seymour and Shelton) .......................................................................... 9 Section 3 (Derby and Shelton) ............................................................................... 13 Section 4 (Derby and Shelton) ............................................................................... 16 Section 5 (Derby, Shelton and Orange) ................................................................. 19 Section 6 (Shelton and Orange) ............................................................................. 21 Section 7 (Milford and Stratford) .......................................................................... 24 Section 8 (Milford and Stratford) .......................................................................... 28 Section 9 (Milford and Stratford) .........................................................................
  • The History of the Strong Family and the Farm Written by Norman R

    The History of the Strong Family and the Farm Written by Norman R

    The history of the Strong family and the farm written by Norman R. Strong in the winter of 2009. …. In writing the history of the Strong Farm, it is beneficial that you have the history of the Strong family as given to me by father as given to him by his grandfather. So it is with me working with my dad being in partnership with him and later operating the farm by myself. He told me of Elder Jonathan Strong coming from England to Taunton, Mass. and later on drifting down to Connecticut to Hebron and later to Bolton with his family. He told me of Daniel Strong in Bolton running a gin mill and selling it in New York City. He lost all his money and broke up his large family. He was the father of Nathan Morgan Strong in 1829. He gave Nathan at 6 years of age to a cousin in Glastonbury. At a young age, Nathan worked in a mill in East Glastonbury and also in Cheney Mills in Manchester. Later he worked for a man named Ellis now on Route 85 making charcoal. One afternoon when he was about 15, he gave him a pair of cattle and a horse to take a load of charcoal to Hartford to pedal. He put the cattle in a livery stable with the horse and he slept under the wagon on a blanket so the other wagons wouldn’t run over him as they came in. He pedaled the charcoal all day and got home about 12 a.m.
  • Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix

    Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix

    Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix - September 2018 Year Open/Posted/Cl Rank Town Facility Carried Features Intersected Location Lanes ADT Deck Superstructure Substructure Built osed Hartford County Ranked by Lowest Score 1 Bloomfield ROUTE 189 WASH BROOK 0.4 MILE NORTH OF RTE 178 1916 2 9,800 Open 6 2 7 2 South Windsor MAIN STREET PODUNK RIVER 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-291 1907 2 1,510 Posted 5 3 6 3 Bloomfield ROUTE 178 BEAMAN BROOK 1.2 MI EAST OF ROUTE 189 1915 2 12,000 Open 6 3 7 4 Bristol MELLEN STREET PEQUABUCK RIVER 300 FT SOUTH OF ROUTE 72 1956 2 2,920 Open 3 6 7 5 Southington SPRING STREET QUINNIPIAC RIVER 0.6 MI W. OF ROUTE 10 1960 2 3,866 Open 3 7 6 6 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 MARKET STREET & I-91 NB EAST END I-91 & I-84 INT 1961 4 125,700 Open 5 4 4 7 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING EASTBOUND 1965 3 66,450 Open 6 4 4 8 Hartford INTERSTATE-91 NB PARK RIVER & CSO RR AT EXIT 29A 1964 2 48,200 Open 5 4 4 9 New Britain SR 555 (WEST MAIN PAN AM SOUTHERN RAILROAD 0.4 MILE EAST OF RTE 372 1930 3 10,600 Open 4 5 4 10 West Hartford NORTH MAIN STREET WEST BRANCH TROUT BROOK 0.3 MILE NORTH OF FERN ST 1901 4 10,280 Open N 4 4 11 Manchester HARTFORD ROAD SOUTH FORK HOCKANUM RIV 2000 FT EAST OF SR 502 1875 2 5,610 Open N 4 4 12 Avon OLD FARMS ROAD FARMINGTON RIVER 500 FEET WEST OF ROUTE 10 1950 2 4,999 Open 4 4 6 13 Marlborough JONES HOLLOW ROAD BLACKLEDGE RIVER 3.6 MILES NORTH OF RTE 66 1929 2 1,255 Open 5 4 4 14 Enfield SOUTH RIVER STREET FRESHWATER BROOK 50 FT N OF ASNUNTUCK ST 1920 2 1,016 Open 5 4 4 15 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB BROAD ST, I-84 RAMP 191 1.17 MI S OF JCT US 44 WB 1966 3 71,450 Open 6 4 5 16 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EAST NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 1967 3 69,000 Open 6 4 5 17 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 WB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING .82 MI N OF JCT SR 504 SB 1965 4 66,150 Open 6 4 5 18 Hartford I-91 SB & TR 835 CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RR AT EXIT 29A 1958 5 46,450 Open 6 5 4 19 Hartford SR 530 -AIRPORT RD ROUTE 15 422 FT E OF I-91 1964 5 27,200 Open 5 6 4 20 Bristol MEMORIAL BLVD.
  • 2018 Plan of Conservation and Development Final

    2018 Plan of Conservation and Development Final

    Photo: Charger Way, Ansonia High School ©Melissa Cavanaugh PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ANSONIA, CONNECTICUT PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Effective Date: August 6, 2018 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Special thanks and Acknowledgements to: Members of the Planning and Zoning Commission: Jared Heon-Chairman Larry Pellegrino- Vice Chairman Micheal Bettini Maureen McMcormack Conrado Kenneth Moffat Timothy Holman William Malerba And to: Mayor David S. Cassetti David Elder, AICP – City Planner Sheila O’Malley - Economic Development Director Ronda Porrini - Land Use Administrator Anna Andretta – Grants Specialist As well as to the residents of the City of Ansonia, all past Planning and Zoning Commissioners, and all Boards and Commissions that contributed to this process. Technical assistance provided by NVCOG staff: Mark Nielsen - Director of Planning / Assistant Director Joanna Rogalski - Regional Planner Glenda Prentiss - GIS Program Coordinator Max Tanguay-Colucci – Regional Planner Note: Special Thanks to Planimetrics; portions of this Plan are taken partly or entirely from the 2002 Ansonia Plan of Conservation and Development, originally prepared by Planimetrics. PLAN OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT CITY OF ANSONIA, CT Contents About the POCD ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 POCD Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Renaissance Place Final

    Renaissance Place Final

    Fiscal Impact and Market Analysis Renaissance Place Naugatuck, Connecticut Prepared For: Borough of Naugatuck Naugatuck Economic Development Corporation The Conroy Development Company By: Harrall-Michalowski Associates, Inc. in association with Milone & MacBroom, Inc. – Civil Engineering John Thompson – Traffic Engineering MAY 3, 2006 Executive Summary • Market trends support the feasibility of proposed uses. • A significant amount of demand for residential units will come from eastern portion of Fairfield County. • Retail component will be unique destination lifestyle retail drawing from a regional market area. • Off-site infrastructure improvements will be needed to support site- generated traffic. These will include increased capacity at the Route 8 / Route 63 interchange as well as signalization and geometric improvements at several local street intersections. • On-site improvements to the flood control system may be needed as such relate to outfalls into the Naugatuck River and related pumps. It should be noted that no flooding has been experienced in the recent past and the project site is not within the 100-year flood area as shown on the official flood maps. • These infrastructure needs can be provided at a cost consistent with the value of the development. • The net tax increase to the Borough after payment of municipal and school costs will be approximately $3.5 million on an annual basis. This revenue could support infrastructure investments and contribute to the General Fund. • The development of the project will generate an estimated 1,425 construction jobs and 950 full-time jobs upon occupancy. • The spin-off impact of the project construction will be $179 million in expenditures including $45 million in wages supporting another 1,100 jobs in the region beyond direct construction jobs.
  • National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination

    National Register of Historic Places Inventory-Nomination

    FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department of the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name__________________ historic Housatnnir. Railroad Station_______________ and/or common New Milford Railroad Station 2. Location street & number Railroad not for publication city, town New Milford ftrtdgre~~S£^ vicinity of congressional district state CT code 09 county Litchfield 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use __ district x public occupied agriculture museum x building(s) private x unoccupied commercial park structure both work in progress educational private residence site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process yes: restricted government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation N/A X no military ^x_ other: unused 4. Owner of Property name Town nf IStew Mi 1 ford street & number 10 Main street city, town New Milford vicinity of state 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. New Milford Town Hall street & number 10 Main Street city, town New Milford, state CT 6. Representation in Existing Surveys State Register has this property been determined elegible? yes no date 1983 federal state county local depository for survey records Connecticut Historical Commission 59 South city, town Hartford, state CT 06106 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent deteriorated unaltered x original site good ruins x altered moved date _ X-fair unexposed (roof) Describe the present and original (if known) physical appearance Setting The New Milford Railroad Station is a simple, one-and-one- half-story, gabled-roof frame building which stands on an open site on a commercial street on the west edge of the village center.