Arms Regeneration in the Squid Lolliguncula Panamensis (Mollusca: Cephalopoda)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Arms Regeneration in the Squid Lolliguncula Panamensis (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research, 47(2):Arms 356-360 regeneration, 2019 in Lolliguncula panamensis 1 DOI: 10.3856/vol47-issue2-fulltext-16 Short Communication Arms regeneration in the squid Lolliguncula panamensis (Mollusca: Cephalopoda) Sairi Saraí León Guzmán1 & María del Carmen Alejo-Plata2 1Posgrado en Ecología Marina, Universidad del Mar Campus Puerto Ángel, Oaxaca, México 2Instituto de Recursos, Universidad del Mar Campus Puerto Ángel, Oaxaca, México Corresponding author: María del Carmen Alejo-Plata ([email protected]) ABSTRACT. During two sampling trips carried out over the continental platform of Gulf of Tehuantepec, a total of 101 Lolliguncula panamensis Berry, 1911 were caught. Thirty mature specimens (19 females and 11 males) were found to have unusually short arms. Dorsal mantle length, arm's length, and body weight were measured from the fresh specimens. Evidence of regeneration was observed at different points along arms; these may have been the result of partial autonomies. In the injured arms, the surface of the arm's tip was wholly covered with skin. Fracture planes were found in our histological sections; the autotomized arms exhibited constricted muscle fibers in the longitudinal sections indicative of wound closing. The arms of the specimens observed were very similar to the regenerating arms of other squids. This study represents the first to report arms regeneration and hectocotylus in this squid wild-caught. These results suggest that Lolliguncula panamensis exhibit partial autotomy, and the ability to regenerate the arms. Additionally, each of the eight arms can do so, presumably during defensive interaction or mating. Keywords: Lolliguncula panamensis; Loliginidae; arm regeneration; autotomy; Gulf of Tehuantepec Lolliguncula panamensis Berry, 2011 is distributed in ned according to the criteria of Tressler et al. (2014): the Eastern Pacific from the Gulf of California, Mexico frayed edge (I), smooth edge (II), growth bud to Peru (Roper et al., 1995), and principally inhabits appearance (III), tip emergence (IV), and tip elongation depths of less than 45 m (Sánchez, 2003). This species (V). Whole individuals were frozen and later fixed in is a highly opportunistic predator foraging primarily in 10% neutral buffered formalin in seawater tallowed by coastal and epipelagic waters (Arizmendi-Rodríguez et preservation in 70% ethanol. Ten arms were dehydrated al., 2011). In Mexico, this species is recurrent in the in a graded alcohol series, cleared with citrosol and bycatch of the shrimp trawl fishery (Alejo-Plata et al., embedded in paraplast. Longitudinal sections of six 2001); however biological information for this species micros thick were made a Leica rotating microtome and is scarce. stained with hematoxylin-eosin and with Massons Two sampling trips were carried out during trichrome (Bancroft et al., 1990). November-December 2017 and May 2018 to the Gulf The proportion of regeneration was of 19% females of Tehuantepec between Salina Cruz (16º08’29”N, and 10% males. Nineteen females had a total of 50 arms 95º10’50”W) and Barra de Suchiate (16º13’00”N, in regeneration (33%) and 11 males with 48 arms in 92º14’30”W) (Fig. 1). A total of 55 bottom trawls were regeneration (60%) (Table 1). Arm regeneration in ale carried out at a depth of 14.7 to 42.8 m using trawl nets may be important because the arms play an important with a 52.5 mm mesh size. A total of 101 L. panamensis role in grasping the female during mating in this were caught. species. Thirty mature specimens (19 females and 11 males) In females, L4 (left arm 4 length) and R4 (right arm were found to have unusually short arms. Dorsal mantle 4 length) were most frequently lost; in males, L2 and length (ML), arm's length (AL), and body weight (BW) R3 were most frequently lost while L4 (hectocotylus) were measured from the fresh specimens (Roper & and R4 were least frequently missing (Fig. 2). An Voss, 1983). Stages of arm regeneration were determi- accident likely relates the unusual shortness of the arms __________________ Corresponding editor: Eduardo Ríos 3572 Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research Figure 1. Study area with locations of 58 bottoms trawls (black dots). White dots indicate records of Lolliguncula panamensis. Figure 2. Lolliguncula panamensis. Arm positions (L1-L4, R1-R4) that are most often autotomized (regeneration arm stub) in the Gulf of Tehuantepec. L: left; R: right. (e.g., feeding, fighting, jigging) (Ikeda et al., 2004) or arms, the surface of the arm's tip was completely with predator avoidance (Bush, 2012). The hecto- covered with skin (Fig. 3). Fracture planes were cotylized arm was less susceptible to injury in com- observed; the autotomized arms exhibited constricted parison to other arms (Fig. 2) as was observed by Bello muscle fibers in the longitudinal sections, indicative of (1995) for bobtail squids; apparently, only the tip of the wound closing, and cells with dark pink nuclei hectocotylus was involved in the traumatic loss and concentrated at the edges of both ends of arm tissue subsequent regeneration process. Besides, protection were observed (Fig. 4). This study represents the first and more rapid regeneration of this specialized arm to to report for arms regeneration and hectocotylus in L. be due to its importance in mating (Wada, 2017). panamensis wild-caught. The arms of the specimens Evidence of regeneration was observed at different observed were very similar to the regenerating arms of points along arms from L. panamensis; these may have other squids (Bello, 1995; Bush, 2012). been the result of partial autotomies. In the injured (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) RAL 6 (III) 2 (IV) 1.5 (III) 1.3 (III) 1.8 (IV) 34 52 54 12 32 37 28 52 28 39 7.8 7.5 28.3 34.9 33.2 51.3 26.9 22.8 16.5 23.6 47.3 54.9 21.5 29.3 21.9 28.3 32.6 34.1 A4 R 10.05 11.83 V) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) RAL 1.9 ( 2.7 (III) 2.2 (III) 6.7 (III) 29 33 35 33 36 52 16 47 55 29 14 28 40 4.6 13.4 53.4 35.5 10.8 31.5 21.2 27.5 38.2 16.4 16.2 28.2 34.6 56.3 27.2 26.7 37.8 A4 L II (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (III) RAL 4 (III) 3 (IV) 9.7 (III) 3.8 (IV) 2.2 (IV) 32 31 35 20 43 35 27 40 7.1 32.9 39.4 14.2 32.5 22.8 23.2 24.9 22.8 23.4 37.9 20.8 17.9 35.9 44.7 38.9 30.2 30.7 33.7 30.1 30.6 A3 R 15.45 ) (II (II) (II) (II) RAL 2 (III) 1.5 (III) 1.9 (III) 4.4 (IV) Table 1. Measurements of arms Lolliguncula Panamensis caught at the Gulf of Tehuantepec on November-December 2017 and May 2018. Dorsal mantle length 43 42 35 34 33 32 32 32 25 15 42 23 37 36 45 39 34 26 7.6 15.9 19.9 21.5 17.8 13.2 39.6 15.5 44.8 17.3 27.5 39.1 (DML), total weight (W, g), armA3 L 1 length (A1), arm 2 length (A2), arm 3 length (A3), arm 4 length (A4), left (L), right (R), regenerating arm length (RAL), stage, and length (mm). V) I (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) RAL 2 ( 1.8 (IV) 36 22 19 21 19 22 18 33 5.0 42.8 35.4 22.8 40.6 55.2 20.1 14.8 24.1 13.9 22.3 20.8 47.3 22.1 33.3 20.2 36.7 18.8 25.5 25.7 A2 R 11.23 26.21 Arms regeneration in in regeneration Arms V) ( (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) 9 RAL 2 (IV) 2. 1.2 (IV) 13 40 35 16 15 11 18 22 22 20 18 22 20 32 6.3 36.7 44.3 41.5 16.8 19.3 19.3 20.1 46.1 47.4 19.4 32.3 25.8 31.4 A2 L 11.25 11.22 Lolliguncula panamensis Lolliguncula (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) RAL 8.5 (V) 0.9 (III) 2.5 (III) 1.6 (IV) R 27 30 19 17 21 19 30 12 31 6.8 5.7 13.6 16.9 15.3 15.7 27.5 15.7 13.4 17.7 32.9 20.9 21.3 18.8 10.3 11.7 17.5 21.6 18.1 21.5 A1 10.24 ) (V) I (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (II) (I (II) (II) RAL 2.7 26 19 17 20 13 18 17 33 30 30 19 12 17 3.9 20.8 15.4 15.7 14.2 19.4 13.5 16.9 18.8 22.1 12.4 27.7 11.3 12.1 18.2 19.3 28.1 A1 L W 33.3 66.7 51.9 36.5 66.3 75 17.8 41 22.8 4.7 1.6 38.6 55 47 66 40.1 54.8 48.4 52.4 46.8 72.5 85.6 52 75.2 14.2 46 81.3 50 20 20 DML 82.4 99.7 99.3 87.3 104 107 65.1 115 73.6 41.1 28.9 84.9 92.3 100 103 91 104 92.9 98.6 104 110 97.5 96.9 109 62 90 105 98 67.1 62.9 7 /18 /17 Date May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 Dec/1 Dec/17 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May/18 May Nov/17 Nov/17 Nov Sex 358 11 M 10 M 9 M 8 M 7 M 6 M 5 M 4 M 3 M 2 M 1 M 19 F 18 F 17 F 16 F 15 F 14 F 13 F 12 F 11 F 10 F 9 F 8 F 7 F 6 F 5 F 4 F 3 F 2 F 1 F 3 3594 Latin American Journal of Aquatic Research Figure 3.
Recommended publications
  • Feeding Habits and Feeding Grounds of the Northern Elephant Seal Richard
    FEEDING HABITS AND FEEDING GROUNDS OF THE NORTHERN ELEPHANT SEAL RICHARDCONDIT AND BUHNEYJ, LE BOEUF Department of Biology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 ABSTRAC’r-Prey species consumed by northern elephant seals were identified from the stom- ach and throat contents of dead seals and from observations of prey captured. Their diet is catholic, consisting of a variety of pelagic, deep water squid, Pacific hake, sharks, rays, and ratfish. Feeding grounds of elephant seals were inferred from sightings of tagged elephant seals at non-rookery locations. Feeding areas extended from northern Baja California to northern Vancouver Island. Juveniles of both sexes and adult males moved north from their haul out sites in search of food, travelling furthest north during the summer. A few sightings suggested that adult females remain in the vicinity of the rookeries where they breed. Northern elephant seals, Mirounga angustirostris, breed and molt in large aggregations on land in Baja California and California, but spend the majority of the year feeding at sea. The large breeding aggregations are easy to observe and a great deal is known about the elephant seal’s reproductive behavior (Le Boeuf, 1974; Reiter et al., 1981). In contrast, the animals are rarely observed at sea and little is known about their feeding biology. Existing information on the food habits of the northern elephant seal comes from the exam- ination of stomach contents of only nine specimens (Huey, 1930; Freiberg and Dumas, 1954; Cowan and Guiguet, 1956; Morejohn and Baltz, 1970; Antonelis and Fiscus, 1980; Jones, 1981). The remains of sharks, ratfish, squids, and bony fish were identified.
    [Show full text]
  • Forage Fish Management Plan
    Oregon Forage Fish Management Plan November 19, 2016 Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Marine Resources Program 2040 SE Marine Science Drive Newport, OR 97365 (541) 867-4741 http://www.dfw.state.or.us/MRP/ Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Purpose and Need ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Federal action to protect Forage Fish (2016)............................................................................................ 7 The Oregon Marine Fisheries Management Plan Framework .................................................................. 7 Relationship to Other State Policies ......................................................................................................... 7 Public Process Developing this Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 How this Document is Organized .............................................................................................................. 8 A. Resource Analysis ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Revisión Del Género Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) Frente a La Costa Del Pacífico De América Del Sur
    Rev. peru. biol. 20(2): 129 - 136 (Diciembre 2013) the genus LOLLIGUNCULA off the Pacific Coast of South America FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS UNMSM ISSN-L 1561-0837 TRABAJOS ORIGINALES Revision of the genus Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) off the Pacific Coast of South America Revisión del género Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) frente a la costa del Pacífico de América del Sur Franz Cardoso1 and Frederick G. Hochberg2 1 Laboratorio de Biología y Sistemática de Invertebrados Marinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Na- Abstract cional Mayor de San Marcos, Apdo. 11-0058, Lima 11, Perú. In the present paper the species from the genus Lolliguncula Steentrup, 1881 (Cephalopo- 2 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, 2559 Puesta del Sol, Santa da: Loliginidae) in Southeastern Pacific Ocean are reviewed. The presence of Lolliguncula Barbara, California 93105-2936, USA. (Lolliguncula) panamensis Berry, 1911, Lolliguncula (Loliolopsis) diomedeae Hoyle, 1911 and Email Franz Cardoso: [email protected] Lolliguncula (Lolliguncula) argus Brakoniecki and Roper, 1985 are confirmed from Mexican waters to Perú and the species Lolliguncula (Lolliguncula) argus collected during a cruise of the R/V Anton Bruun from 1966 off the coast of South America is recorded for the first time in Peruvian waters. A key to identification of Pacific species is given. We report a diagnostic feature with taxonomic remarks of these species. Updated information on the distribution, biology, and fisheries of each species also is discussed. Keywords: Lolliguncula; taxonomy; distribution; biology; Southeastern Pacific. Resumen En el presente trabajo las especies del género Lolliguncula Steentrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) en el Océano Pacífico Sudeste son revisados.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual
    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
    [Show full text]
  • Defensive Behaviors of Deep-Sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy
    Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy by Stephanie Lynn Bush A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair Professor David R. Lindberg Professor George K. Roderick Dr. Bruce H. Robison Fall, 2009 Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy © 2009 by Stephanie Lynn Bush ABSTRACT Defensive Behaviors of Deep-sea Squids: Ink Release, Body Patterning, and Arm Autotomy by Stephanie Lynn Bush Doctor of Philosophy in Integrative Biology University of California, Berkeley Professor Roy L. Caldwell, Chair The deep sea is the largest habitat on Earth and holds the majority of its’ animal biomass. Due to the limitations of observing, capturing and studying these diverse and numerous organisms, little is known about them. The majority of deep-sea species are known only from net-caught specimens, therefore behavioral ecology and functional morphology were assumed. The advent of human operated vehicles (HOVs) and remotely operated vehicles (ROVs) have allowed scientists to make one-of-a-kind observations and test hypotheses about deep-sea organismal biology. Cephalopods are large, soft-bodied molluscs whose defenses center on crypsis. Individuals can rapidly change coloration (for background matching, mimicry, and disruptive coloration), skin texture, body postures, locomotion, and release ink to avoid recognition as prey or escape when camouflage fails. Squids, octopuses, and cuttlefishes rely on these visual defenses in shallow-water environments, but deep-sea cephalopods were thought to perform only a limited number of these behaviors because of their extremely low light surroundings.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Direct and Indirect Impacts of Marine Dredging Activities on Marine Mammals
    A review of direct and indirect impacts of marine dredging activities on marine mammals Family Scientific name Common name Range of best Frequency of Minimum Methodology Diet Region Habitat Documented Effects of Potential Effects of Dredging (excluding (including hearing (10 dB minimum hearing Dredging subspecies) subspecies) from max; kHz) hearing threshold (dB threshold (kHz) re 1 µPa) Otariidae Arctocephalus Cape & Unknown; — — — Fish (e.g. Emmelichthys nitidus, F, J (Kirkman et Continental shelf waters (IUCN, — Habitat destruction, increase in pusillus Australian fur fundamental Pseudophycis bachus, Trachurus al., 2007; IUCN, 2012) turbidity, changes to prey seal frequency of declivis, Neoplatycephalus 2013; Perrin, availability, masking, incidental male in air barks Richardsoni) (Australian fur seal) 2013) capture or injury, avoidance & is 0.14 & female (Page et al., 2005) an increase in shipping traffic in air barks is 0.15 (Tripovich et al., 2008) Arctophoca Antarctic fur seal Unknown; peak — — — Fish (e.g. Gymnoscopelus A, F, J (IUCN, Forage in deep waters (>500 m) — Habitat destruction, increase in gazella frequency of in piabilis, Electrona subaspera, 2013; Perrin, with a strong chlorophyll turbidity, changes to prey air barks is 0.3– Champsocephalus gunnari) 2013; Reeves et concentration & steep availability, masking, incidental 5.9 (Page et al., (Guinet et al., 2001) al., 2002) bathymetric gradients, otherwise capture or injury, avoidance & 2002) remains close to the colony in an increase in shipping traffic areas with Polar
    [Show full text]
  • Geographic Drivers of Diversification in Loliginid Squids with an Emphasis on the Western Atlantic Species
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.211896; this version posted July 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Original Article Geographic drivers of diversification in loliginid squids with an emphasis on the western Atlantic species Gabrielle Genty1*, Carlos J Pardo-De la Hoz1,2*, Paola Montoya1,3, Elena A. Ritschard1,4* 1Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá D.C, Colombia. 2Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, 27708, United States of America 3Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia 4Department of Neuroscience and Developmental Biology, University of Vienna, Austria * These authors contributed equally to this work. Correspondence author: Gabrielle Genty, [email protected] Acknowledgements We would like to thank Daniel Cadena and Andrew J. Crawford for their suggestions and guidance during the early stages of this investigation. bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.20.211896; this version posted July 21, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 ABSTRACT Aim: Identifying the mechanisms driving divergence in marine organisms is challenging as opportunities for allopatric isolation are less conspicuous than in terrestrial ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1940 Ricketts-Steinbeck Sea of Cortez Expedition: an 80-Year Retrospective Guest Edited by Richard C
    JOURNAL OF THE SOUTHWEST Volume 62, Number 2 Summer 2020 Edited by Jeffrey M. Banister THE SOUTHWEST CENTER UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA TUCSON Associate Editors EMMA PÉREZ Production MANUSCRIPT EDITING: DEBRA MAKAY DESIGN & TYPOGRAPHY: ALENE RANDKLEV West Press, Tucson, AZ COVER DESIGN: CHRISTINE HUBBARD Editorial Advisors LARRY EVERS ERIC PERRAMOND University of Arizona Colorado College MICHAEL BRESCIA LUCERO RADONIC University of Arizona Michigan State University JACQUES GALINIER SYLVIA RODRIGUEZ CNRS, Université de Paris X University of New Mexico CURTIS M. HINSLEY THOMAS E. SHERIDAN Northern Arizona University University of Arizona MARIO MATERASSI CHARLES TATUM Università degli Studi di Firenze University of Arizona CAROLYN O’MEARA FRANCISCO MANZO TAYLOR Universidad Nacional Autónoma Hermosillo, Sonora de México RAYMOND H. THOMPSON MARTIN PADGET University of Arizona University of Wales, Aberystwyth Journal of the Southwest is published in association with the Consortium for Southwest Studies: Austin College, Colorado College, Fort Lewis College, Southern Methodist University, Texas State University, University of Arizona, University of New Mexico, and University of Texas at Arlington. Contents VOLUME 62, NUMBER 2, SUmmer 2020 THE 1940 RICKETTS-STEINBECK SEA OF CORTEZ EXPEDITION: AN 80-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE GUesT EDITed BY RIchard C. BRUsca DedIcaTed TO The WesTerN FLYer FOUNdaTION Publishing the Southwest RIchard C. BRUsca 215 The 1940 Ricketts-Steinbeck Sea of Cortez Expedition, with Annotated Lists of Species and Collection Sites RIchard C. BRUsca 218 The Making of a Marine Biologist: Ed Ricketts RIchard C. BRUsca AND T. LINdseY HasKIN 335 Ed Ricketts: From Pacific Tides to the Sea of Cortez DONald G. Kohrs 373 The Tangled Journey of the Western Flyer: The Boat and Its Fisheries KEVIN M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalog of the Type-Specimens of Recent Cephalopoda in the National Museum of Natural History
    A Catalog of the Type-Specimens of Recent Cephalopoda in the National Museum of Natural History CLYDE F. E. ROPER and MICHAEL J. SWEENEY SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ZOOLOGY • NUMBER 278 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement: "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series: Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Astrophysics Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiotogy Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the Institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world cf science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin of the United States Fish Commission
    A REVIEW OF THE CEPHALOPODS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA By S. Stillman Berry Stanford University, California Blank page retained for pagination A REVIEW OF THE CEPHALOPODS OF WESTERN NORTH AMERICA. By S. STILLMAN BERRY, Stanford University, California. J1. INTRODUCTION. "The region covered by the present report embraces the western shores of North America between Bering Strait on the north and the Coronado Islands on the south, together with the immediately adjacent waters of Bering Sea and the North Pacific Ocean. No attempt is made to present a monograph nor even a complete catalogue of the species now living within this area. The material now at hand is inadequate to properly repre­ sent the fauna of such a vast region, and the stations at which anything resembling extensive collecting has been done are far too few and scattered. Rather I have merely endeavored to bring out of chaos and present under one cover a resume of such work as has already been done, making the necessary corrections wherever possible, and adding accounts of such novelties as have been brought to my notice. Descriptions are given of all the species known to occur or reported from within our limits, and these have been made. as full and accurate as the facilities available to me would allow. I have hoped to do this in such a way that students, particularly in the Western States, will find it unnecessary to have continual access to the widely scattered and often unavailable literature on the subject. In a number of cases, however, the attitude adopted must be understood as little more than provisional in its nature, and more or less extensive revision is to be expected later, especially in the case of the large and difficult genus Polypus, which here attains a development scarcely to be sur­ passed anywhere.
    [Show full text]
  • A FULL DESCRIPTION of LOLIGO SANPAULENSIS, Brakonieckl
    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 34(3): 435-448, 1984 A FULL DESCRIPTION OF LOLIGO SANPAULENSIS, BRAKONIECKl, 1984 AND A REDESCRIPTION OF LOLIGO GAHI D'ORBIGNY, 1835, TWO SPECIES OF SQUID (CEPHALOPODA; MYOPSIDA) FROM THE SOUTHWEST ATLANTIC Thomas F. Brakoniecki ABSTRACT The species of squid referred to as Loligo brasiliensis Blainville, 1823 by Castellanos and Cazzaniga (1979) is shown to be Loligo sanpaulensis (Brakoniecki, 1984). The name Loligo brasiliensis is shown to be a nomen dubium. Loligo gahi d'Orbigny, 1835 and L. sanpaulensis are redescribed and illustrated. Loligo patagonica Smith, 1881 is shown to be a synonym of L. gahi. Loligo ellipsura Hoyle, 1885 is shown to be a nomen dubium. The distribution and identification of Loligo sanpau/ensis and L. gahi are discussed. During the summer of 1982, I was asked to identify some squid obtained by Dr. F. J. Palacio from the coastal waters of Argentina, Uruguay and Brazil. After examining the collection and reviewing the literature, it was evident that the loliginid squid in this area were in need of taxonomic revision. Four nominal species of squid have been reported from these waters: Loligo brasiliensis Blainville, 1823, L. gahi d'Orbigny, 1835, L. patagonica Smith, 1881 and L. ellipsura Hoyle, 1885. These have been discussed in several papers (Cas- tellanos, 1967a; b; Castellanos and Menni, 1968; Filippova, 1969; Castellanos and Cazzaniga, 1977; 1979). In the last of these papers the authors concluded that only two species of loliginids occur in the area, Loligo brasiliensis and L. gahi. Loligo patagonica and L. ellipsura were considered to be junior synonyms of L.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History
    Living Resources Committee ICES CM 2002/G:02 Ref. ACFM, ACE REPORT OF THE Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History Lisbon, Portugal 4–6 December 2002 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Attendance ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Opening of the Meeting and Arrangements for the Preparation of the Report ............................................... 2 2 LANDINGS AND EFFORT STATISTICS AND SURVEY DATA (TOR A)......................................................... 3 2.1 Compilation of Landing Statistics................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 General Trends...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]