DOCSLIB.ORG

Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Living Resources Committee ICES CM 2002/G:02 Ref. ACFM, ACE REPORT OF THE Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History Lisbon, Portugal 4–6 December 2002 This report is not to be quoted without prior consultation with the General Secretary. The document is a report of an expert group under the auspices of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea and does not necessarily represent the views of the Council. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea Conseil International pour l’Exploration de la Mer Palægade 2–4 DK–1261 Copenhagen K Denmark TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Terms of Reference......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Attendance ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Opening of the Meeting and Arrangements for the Preparation of the Report ............................................... 2 2 LANDINGS AND EFFORT STATISTICS AND SURVEY DATA (TOR A)......................................................... 3 2.1 Compilation of Landing Statistics................................................................................................................... 3 2.2 General Trends................................................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 National Trends............................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.1 England and Wales ........................................................................................................................... 4 2.3.2 France ............................................................................................................................................. 17 2.3.3 Portugal........................................................................................................................................... 19 2.3.4 Spain ............................................................................................................................................... 22 2.3.5 Ireland............................................................................................................................................. 22 2.3.6 Cephalopod Fishery Trends outside ICES waters........................................................................... 23 2.4 Cephalopod discards data.............................................................................................................................. 23 2.5 Gear selectivity data...................................................................................................................................... 24 2.6 Conclusions................................................................................................................................................... 24 3 STOCK IDENTIFICATION AND POPULATION SIZE ESTIMATION (TOR B)............................................... 32 3.1 Stock identification ....................................................................................................................................... 32 3.2 Estimates of population trends based on indices........................................................................................... 32 3.3 Total stock size assessments ......................................................................................................................... 32 4 POSSIBLE PRECAUTIONARY APPROACHES TO MANAGEMENT (TOR C)............................................... 33 4.1 Minimum Landing Sizes (MLS) ................................................................................................................... 33 4.2 Minimum Mesh Sizes (MMS) ...................................................................................................................... 33 4.3 Stock enhancement and protected areas........................................................................................................ 33 4.4 Catch and effort controls............................................................................................................................... 33 4.4.1 Licences. ......................................................................................................................................... 34 4.4.2 Total Allowable Catches and Effort restrictions............................................................................. 34 4.5 General considerations.................................................................................................................................. 34 5 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS AFFECTING RECRUITMENT AND DISTRIBUTION PATTERNS (TOR D)........................................................................................................ 34 6 CEPHALOPOD CULTURE TECHNIQUES (TOR E) ...........................................................................................35 7 CEPHALOPOD LITERATURE RELEVANT TO FISHERIES (TOR F) .............................................................. 35 8 RESEARCH PRIORITIES ...................................................................................................................................... 35 8.1 Importance of including cephalopods in the National Sampling .................................................................. 35 8.2 Research priorities ........................................................................................................................................ 36 9 THE FUTURE PROGRAMME OF WGCEPH AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 36 9.1 Terms of reference ........................................................................................................................................ 36 9.2 Next WGCEPH meeting ............................................................................................................................... 37 10 OTHER BUSINESS................................................................................................................................................. 37 11 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... 37 12 REFERENCES......................................................................................................................................................... 37 ANNEX 1 CEPHALOPOD BIBLIOGRAPHY (2002-03).............................................................................................. 40 ANNEX 2 ......................................................................................................................................................................... 49 @# 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Terms of Reference As indicated in the ICES Annual Report for 2002, ICES Council Resolution 2002/2G01 stated that the Working Group on Cephalopod Fisheries and Life History [WGCEPH] (Chair: Dr .J.P. Robin, France) would meet in Lisbon, Portugal from 4-6 December 2002 to: a) update currently available landing statistics and information on fishing effort and discards and gear selectivity; explore existing resource survey databases for information about sampled cephalopods in the ICES area; b) compile methods and results available for stock identification and estimation of population size of fished cephalopods; c) identify possible precautionary approaches to the management of these cephalopod resources; and provide management options. d) compile available data and identify relationships between abundance and environmental conditions, factors affecting recruitment, migration and distribution patterns of juveniles and adults, and trophic interactions; e) review cephalopod culture techniques and results and their interest in the understanding of biological phenomena. f) update the bibliographic database of cephalopod literature relevant to fisheries, including grey literature; WGCEPH will report by the end of April 2003 for the attention of the Living Resources Committee, ACFM and ACE. 1.2 Attendance The WGCEPH meeting at the Tivoli Tejo Hotel, Lisbon, 5-6 December 2002, was attended by 11 of the currently appointed WGCEPH members. These participants represented 5 ICES member states (France, Germany, Portugal, Spain, UK). Participants: 1) WGCEPH members Name Address Telephone and Fax E-mail Dr. Teresa Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR) Tel: +351.289 800924 [email protected] Cerveira University of Algarve, Campus de Gambelas Fax: +351.289 818353 Borges 8000-810 Faro Portugal Dr. Matthew CEFAS Lowestoft Laboratory,Pakefield Road Tel: +44 1502 562244 [email protected] Dunn Lowestoft, Suffolk NR33 0HT, UK Fax +44 1502 513865 Dr. Angel ECOBIOMAR, Instituto de Investigacions Tel +34-986-231930 [email protected] Guerra Mariñas, Eduardo Cabello 6, E-36208 Vigo, (Ext. 181) Spain Fax: 34 986 292762 Dr. Noussithé Université de Caen, 14032 Caen Cedex, Tel +33 231 538016 [email protected] Koueta France Fax +33 231 538009 Dr. Ana IPIMAR, Avenida de Brasília, S/N, 1449-006 Tel +351-1-3027000 [email protected] Moreno Lisbon, Portugal Fax +351-1-3015948 Dr. João IPIMAR, Avenida de Brasília, S/N, 1449-006 Tel +351-1-3027000 [email protected]
Recommended publications
  • Length-Weight Relationship of Neon Flying Squid Ommastrephes Bartramii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) Caught from Indian Sector of Southern Ocean

    Length-Weight Relationship of Neon Flying Squid Ommastrephes Bartramii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) Caught from Indian Sector of Southern Ocean

    Indian Journal of Geo-Marine Science Vol. 43(8), August 2014, pp 1581-1584 Length-weight relationship of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) caught from Indian sector of Southern Ocean. *Aneesh Kumar K. V1#., Pravin P1., Ragesh N2 & Meenakumari B3. 1Central Institute of Fisheries Technology, Matsyapuri, Willingdon Island. Cochin-682029, India, 2Central Marine Fisheries Research Institute, Cochin- 682018, India, 3Indian Council of Agricultural Research, Krishi Anusandhan Bhavan 2, New Delhi-110012, India #Present address: Centre for Marine Living Resources and Ecology Kendriya Bhavan, CSEZ P.O., Cochin-682037, India *[E. Mail: [email protected]] Received 1 July 2013; revised 7 August 2013 Length-weight relationship of the Neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii, caught from the Indian Sector of Southern Ocean was estimated as male W= 0.0235 L 3.05 (R2 = 0.990719) and females W= 0.0283 L 2.99 (R2 = 0.919944). The species follows an isometric growth pattern and no significant difference was observed between both sexes. [Key words: Length- Weight Relation, Squid, Ommastrephes bartramii, Southern Ocean] Introduction Ommastrephes bartramii (Lesueur, 1821) is a morphometric characters gives a better idea for widely distributed oceanic ommastrephid species understanding the relationship between the species throughout the subtropical and temperate waters of and to compare same species in different both northern and southern hemisphere and geographical areas8. The study of the individual excluded from the equatorial waters of all three growth pattern gives an insight about the population oceans1 and forms a major fishery in the Japanese dynamics of the species such as growth and squid fisheries in the Pacific Ocean2.
  • REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus Bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO

    REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus Bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO

    INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL CENTRO INTERDISCIPLINARIO DE CIENCIAS MARINAS REPRODUCCIÓN DEL PULPO Octopus bimaculatus Verrill, 1883 EN BAHÍA DE LOS ÁNGELES, BAJA CALIFORNIA, MÉXICO TESIS QUE PARA OBTENER EL GRADO ACADÉMICO DE MAESTRO EN CIENCIAS PRESENTA BIÓL. MAR. SHEILA CASTELLANOS MARTINEZ La Paz, B.C.S., Agosto de 2008 AGRADECIMIENTOS Agradezco al Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas por abrirme las puertas para llevar a cabo mis estudios de maestría, así como al Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) y a los proyectos PIFI por el respaldo económico brindado durante dicho periodo. Deseo expresar mi agradecimiento a mis directores, Dr. Marcial Arellano Martínez y Dr. Federico A. García Domínguez por apoyarme para aprender a revisar cortes histológicos (algo que siempre dije que no haría jaja!), lidiar con mis carencias de conocimiento, enseñarme cosas nuevas y ayudarme a encauzar las ideas. Gracias también a la Dra. Patricia Ceballos (Pati) por la asesoría con las numerosas dudas que surgieron a lo largo de este estudio, las correcciones y por enseñarme algunos trucos para que los cortes histológicos me quedaran bien. Los valiosos comentarios del Dr. Oscar E. Holguín Quiñones y M.C. Marcial Villalejo Fuerte definitivamente han sido imprescindibles para concluir satisfactoriamente este trabajo. A todos, gracias por contribuir en mi formación profesional y personal. Quiero extender mi gratitud al Dr. Gustavo Danemann (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) así como al Lic. Esteban Torreblanca (PRONATURA Noroeste, A.C.) por todo su apoyo para el desarrollo de la tesis; igualmente, a la Asociación de Buzos de Bahía de Los Ángeles, A.C. por su importante participación en la obtención de muestras y por el interés activo que siempre han mostrado hacia este estudio.
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    Os Nomes Galegos Dos Moluscos

    A Chave Os nomes galegos dos moluscos 2017 Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (2017): Nomes galegos dos moluscos recomendados pola Chave. http://www.achave.gal/wp-content/uploads/achave_osnomesgalegosdos_moluscos.pdf 1 Notas introdutorias O que contén este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións para as especies de moluscos galegos (e) ou europeos, e tamén para algunhas das especies exóticas máis coñecidas (xeralmente no ámbito divulgativo, por causa do seu interese científico ou económico, ou por seren moi comúns noutras áreas xeográficas). En total, achéganse nomes galegos para 534 especies de moluscos. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase unha clasificación taxonómica que considera as clases, ordes, superfamilias e familias de moluscos. Aquí apúntase, de maneira xeral, os nomes dos moluscos que hai en cada familia. A seguir vén o corpo do documento, onde se indica, especie por especie, alén do nome científico, os nomes galegos e ingleses de cada molusco (nalgún caso, tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles). Ao final inclúese unha listaxe de referencias bibliográficas que foron utilizadas para a elaboración do presente documento. Nalgunhas desas referencias recolléronse ou propuxéronse nomes galegos para os moluscos, quer xenéricos quer específicos. Outras referencias achegan nomes para os moluscos noutras linguas, que tamén foron tidos en conta. Alén diso, inclúense algunhas fontes básicas a respecto da metodoloxía e dos criterios terminolóxicos empregados. 2 Tratamento terminolóxico De modo moi resumido, traballouse nas seguintes liñas e cos seguintes criterios: En primeiro lugar, aprofundouse no acervo lingüístico galego. A respecto dos nomes dos moluscos, a lingua galega é riquísima e dispomos dunha chea de nomes, tanto específicos (que designan un único animal) como xenéricos (que designan varios animais parecidos).
  • Crustacea-Arthropoda) Fauna of Sinop and Samsun and Their Ecology

    Crustacea-Arthropoda) Fauna of Sinop and Samsun and Their Ecology

    J. Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment Vol. 15: 47- 60 (2009) Freshwater and brackish water Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) fauna of Sinop and Samsun and their ecology Sinop ve Samsun illeri tatlısu ve acısu Malacostraca (Crustacea-Arthropoda) faunası ve ekolojileri Mehmet Akbulut1*, M. Ruşen Ustaoğlu2, Ekrem Şanver Çelik1 1 Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Fisheries Faculty, Çanakkale-Turkey 2 Ege University, Fisheries Faculty, Izmir-Turkey Abstract Malacostraca fauna collected from freshwater and brackishwater in Sinop and Samsun were studied from 181 stations between February 1999 and September 2000. 19 species and 4 subspecies belonging to 15 genuses were found in 134 stations. In total, 23 taxon were found: 11 Amphipoda, 6 Decapoda, 4 Isopoda, and 2 Mysidacea. Limnomysis benedeni is the first time in Turkish Mysidacea fauna. In this work at the first time recorded group are Gammarus pulex pulex, Gammarus aequicauda, Gammarus uludagi, Gammarus komareki, Gammarus longipedis, Gammarus balcanicus, Echinogammarus ischnus, Orchestia stephenseni Paramysis kosswigi, Idotea baltica basteri, Idotea hectica, Sphaeroma serratum, Palaemon adspersus, Crangon crangon, Potamon ibericum tauricum and Carcinus aestuarii in the studied area. Potamon ibericum tauricum is the most encountered and widespread species. Key words: Freshwater, brackish water, Malacostraca, Sinop, Samsun, Turkey Introduction The Malacostraca is the largest subgroup of crustaceans and includes the decapods such as crabs, mole crabs, lobsters, true shrimps and the stomatopods or mantis shrimps. There are more than 22,000 taxa in this group representing two third of all crustacean species and contains all the larger forms. *Corresponding author: [email protected] 47 Malacostracans play an important role in aquatic ecosystems and therefore their conservation is important.
  • Squid and Octopus

    Squid and Octopus

    Sector Improvement Profile: Squid and Octopus More than half (52%) of global production is yellow- or red-rated, indicating that improvements are needed, and 45% is status unknown. Our improvement efforts prioritize: • The 27% of global squid and octopus production that is red-rated; and • The 39% within the scope of Sustainable Fisheries Partnership’s Target 75 Initiative. Red-rated Species Source country Argentine shortfin squid Argentina Common octopus Mexico, Portugal, Spain Common squids nei Indonesia, Thailand Japanese flying squid Japan Mexican four-eyed octopus Mexico Octopuses nei Indonesia, Mauritania, Morocco, Philippines Various squids nei China, India The Monterey Bay Aquarium’s Seafood Watch Program ratings are based on specific location and production method information and make exceptions for specific brands. For detailed information, visit the Seafood Watch recommendations on squid and octopus. FIP or AIP Where available, the links below lead to detailed information about FIPs listed on FisheryProgress.org. Species Source country Day Octopus Madagascar California Two-Spot Octopus Mexico Giant Pacific Octopus Japan Japanese Flying Squid China Jumbo Squid Mexico, Peru Mitre Squid China Red octopus Chile, Mexico Octopus China The Seafood Certification & Ratings Collaboration unites five global seafood certification and ratings programs working together to coordinate our tools and increase our impact so that more seafood producers move along a clear path toward environmental sustainability and social responsibility. Learn
  • Revisión Del Género Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) Frente a La Costa Del Pacífico De América Del Sur

    Revisión Del Género Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) Frente a La Costa Del Pacífico De América Del Sur

    Rev. peru. biol. 20(2): 129 - 136 (Diciembre 2013) the genus LOLLIGUNCULA off the Pacific Coast of South America FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS BIOLÓGICAS UNMSM ISSN-L 1561-0837 TRABAJOS ORIGINALES Revision of the genus Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) off the Pacific Coast of South America Revisión del género Lolliguncula Steenstrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) frente a la costa del Pacífico de América del Sur Franz Cardoso1 and Frederick G. Hochberg2 1 Laboratorio de Biología y Sistemática de Invertebrados Marinos, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Na- Abstract cional Mayor de San Marcos, Apdo. 11-0058, Lima 11, Perú. In the present paper the species from the genus Lolliguncula Steentrup, 1881 (Cephalopo- 2 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, 2559 Puesta del Sol, Santa da: Loliginidae) in Southeastern Pacific Ocean are reviewed. The presence of Lolliguncula Barbara, California 93105-2936, USA. (Lolliguncula) panamensis Berry, 1911, Lolliguncula (Loliolopsis) diomedeae Hoyle, 1911 and Email Franz Cardoso: [email protected] Lolliguncula (Lolliguncula) argus Brakoniecki and Roper, 1985 are confirmed from Mexican waters to Perú and the species Lolliguncula (Lolliguncula) argus collected during a cruise of the R/V Anton Bruun from 1966 off the coast of South America is recorded for the first time in Peruvian waters. A key to identification of Pacific species is given. We report a diagnostic feature with taxonomic remarks of these species. Updated information on the distribution, biology, and fisheries of each species also is discussed. Keywords: Lolliguncula; taxonomy; distribution; biology; Southeastern Pacific. Resumen En el presente trabajo las especies del género Lolliguncula Steentrup, 1881 (Cephalopoda: Loliginidae) en el Océano Pacífico Sudeste son revisados.
  • Life History, Mating Behavior, and Multiple Paternity in Octopus

    Life History, Mating Behavior, and Multiple Paternity in Octopus

    LIFE HISTORY, MATING BEHAVIOR, AND MULTIPLE PATERNITY IN OCTOPUS OLIVERI (BERRY, 1914) (CEPHALOPODA: OCTOPODIDAE) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI´I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ZOOLOGY DECEMBER 2014 By Heather Anne Ylitalo-Ward Dissertation Committee: Les Watling, Chairperson Rob Toonen James Wood Tom Oliver Jeff Drazen Chuck Birkeland Keywords: Cephalopod, Octopus, Sexual Selection, Multiple Paternity, Mating DEDICATION To my family, I would not have been able to do this without your unending support and love. Thank you for always believing in me. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank all of the people who helped me collect the specimens for this study, braving the rocks and the waves in the middle of the night: Leigh Ann Boswell, Shannon Evers, and Steffiny Nelson, you were the hard core tako hunters. I am eternally grateful that you sacrificed your evenings to the octopus gods. Also, thank you to David Harrington (best bucket boy), Bert Tanigutchi, Melanie Hutchinson, Christine Ambrosino, Mark Royer, Chelsea Szydlowski, Ily Iglesias, Katherine Livins, James Wood, Seth Ylitalo-Ward, Jessica Watts, and Steven Zubler. This dissertation would not have happened without the support of my wonderful advisor, Dr. Les Watling. Even though I know he wanted me to study a different kind of “octo” (octocoral), I am so thankful he let me follow my foolish passion for cephalopod sexual selection. Also, he provided me with the opportunity to ride in a submersible, which was one of the most magical moments of my graduate career.
  • Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena Lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae)

    Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena Lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae)

    Husbandry Manual for BLUE-RINGED OCTOPUS Hapalochlaena lunulata (Mollusca: Octopodidae) Date By From Version 2005 Leanne Hayter Ultimo TAFE v 1 T A B L E O F C O N T E N T S 1 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ 5 2 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 CLASSIFICATION .............................................................................................................................. 8 2.2 GENERAL FEATURES ....................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 HISTORY IN CAPTIVITY ..................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 EDUCATION ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.5 CONSERVATION & RESEARCH ........................................................................................................ 10 3 TAXONOMY ............................................................................................................................12 3.1 NOMENCLATURE ........................................................................................................................... 12 3.2 OTHER SPECIES ...........................................................................................................................
  • Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus Dofleini) Care Manual

    Giant Pacific Octopus Insert Photo within this space (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual CREATED BY AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxonomic Advisory Group IN ASSOCIATION WITH AZA Animal Welfare Committee Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual Published by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums in association with the AZA Animal Welfare Committee Formal Citation: AZA Aquatic Invertebrate Taxon Advisory Group (AITAG) (2014). Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) Care Manual. Association of Zoos and Aquariums, Silver Spring, MD. Original Completion Date: September 2014 Dedication: This work is dedicated to the memory of Roland C. Anderson, who passed away suddenly before its completion. No one person is more responsible for advancing and elevating the state of husbandry of this species, and we hope his lifelong body of work will inspire the next generation of aquarists towards the same ideals. Authors and Significant Contributors: Barrett L. Christie, The Dallas Zoo and Children’s Aquarium at Fair Park, AITAG Steering Committee Alan Peters, Smithsonian Institution, National Zoological Park, AITAG Steering Committee Gregory J. Barord, City University of New York, AITAG Advisor Mark J. Rehling, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo Roland C. Anderson, PhD Reviewers: Mike Brittsan, Columbus Zoo and Aquarium Paula Carlson, Dallas World Aquarium Marie Collins, Sea Life Aquarium Carlsbad David DeNardo, New York Aquarium Joshua Frey Sr., Downtown Aquarium Houston Jay Hemdal, Toledo
  • Mercury Levels of Seafood Commonly Consumed in Taiwan

    Mercury Levels of Seafood Commonly Consumed in Taiwan

    373 Journal of Food and Drug Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2006, Pages 373-378 藥物食品分析 第十四卷 第四期 Mercury Levels of Seafood Commonly Consumed in Taiwan Y. C. CHEN1,2 AND M. H. CHEN2* 1. Department of Food Nutrition, Chung Hwa College of Medical Technology, Jen-Te Hsiang, Tainan 717, Taiwan, R.O.C. 2. Department of Marine Biotechnology and Resources, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City 80424, Taiwan, R.O.C. (Received: February 14, 2006; Accepted: June 26, 2006) ABSTRACT In this study, the mercury level in 25 commonly consumed seafood species was identified and used to evaluate the mercury intake for Taiwan population. Total mercury concentrations were determined by using furnace-gold amalgation mercury analyzer. The results indicated that mercury concentrations of the 25 seafood species ranged from 0.002 to 0.198 mg/kg wet wt. and varied significantly across species (p < 0.05). All mercury concentrations of the 25 seafood species were below the safety standards, 0.5 mg/kg, set by TWDOH, EC and FAO/WHO. Mercury intake from seafood consumption for female and male adults in Taiwan was estimated to be 21 and 30 μg/week, respectively, which was well below the PTWI. Among the seafood items tested, fish was the major source of total mercury intake for Taiwan population (74-83%). The marine fish contributed the most, followed by shellfish and freshwater fish. The highest mercury level was found in tuna. The mercury intake could be within the PTWI if general popu- lation weighted 65 kg consumed daily 90 g of seafood with mercury concentration as 0.17 mg/kg.
  • Feeding Ecology of Enteroctopus Megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in Southern Chile Christian M

    Feeding Ecology of Enteroctopus Megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in Southern Chile Christian M

    Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2008, 88(4), 793–798. #2008 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom doi:10.1017/S0025315408001227 Printed in the United Kingdom Feeding ecology of Enteroctopus megalocyathus (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae) in southern Chile christian m. ibanez~ 1 and javier v. chong2 1Instituto de Ecologı´a y Biodiversidad, Departamento de Ciencias Ecolo´gicas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, PO Box 563, Santiago, Chile, 2Departamento de Ecologı´a Costera, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Cato´lica de la Santı´sima Concepcio´n, P.O. BOX 297, Concepcio´n, Chile In this research we studied the diet of Enteroctopus megalocyathus from three principal locations of the octopus fishery (Ancud, Quello´n and Melinka) in southern Chile. The gastric contents of 523 individuals, collected between October 1999 and September 2000, were examined and statistically analysed. Diet composition was described using detrended correspon- dence analysis and analysed as a function of predator gender, body size and fishing area. Food items were found in ~50% of the octopuses examined and a total of 14 prey items were recognized. The diet of E. megalocyathus consisted primarily in brachyuran and anomuran crustaceans, fish and conspecifics. The diet differed in composition between fishing zones and mantle length of the specimens and size of octopuses varied between locations. After adjusting for octopus mantle length, diet composition was found to be different between fishing areas. Large octopuses fed on large crabs at Ancud, while in Quello´n and Melinka small octopuses fed mainly on small crustaceans. There were no differences in prey composition between the gender and the size of octopuses was a better predictor of the variance in the diet composition (16%) than the fishing zone (6%).
  • Feeding Habits of an Exotic Species, the Mediterranean Green Crab Carcinus Aestuarii, in Tokyo Bay

    Feeding Habits of an Exotic Species, the Mediterranean Green Crab Carcinus Aestuarii, in Tokyo Bay

    Feeding habits of Car cinus aestuarii RB Chen et al. 10.1046/j.1444-2906.2004.00822.x Original Article430435BEES SGML FISHERIES SCIENCE 2004; 70: 430–435 Feeding habits of an exotic species, the Mediterranean green crab Carcinus aestuarii, in Tokyo Bay Rong Bin CHEN, Seiichi WATANABE* AND Masashi YOKOTA Department of Aquatic Biosciences, Tokyo University of Marine Science and Technology, Minato, Tokyo 108-8477, Japan ABSTRACT: Feeding habits of an exotic species, the Mediterranean green crab Carcinus aestuarii, in Tokyo Bay, Japan, were studied based on the analysis of stomach contents. Monthly samples were taken from May 2000 to October 2001 at stations near the Keihin Canal along the northern shore of Tokyo Bay. Stomach contents of 367 crabs (male n = 200, female n = 167) were examined. Carapace width ranged from 18.50 mm to 60.67 mm. Eleven food categories were identified: Bivalvia (mostly Mytilus galloprovincialis), other Mollusca, Cirripedia, Amphipoda, Brachyura, other Crustacea, Poly- chaeta, Pisces, unidentified animal materials, plant materials, and unidentified materials. The results showed that C. aestuarii is an omnivorous predator and that its diet depends greatly upon the availability of local prey species, especially in intertidal areas. Moreover, the analysis found no significant differences in the feeding habits of crabs of different sizes or sexes. KEY WORDS: Carcinus aestuarii, exotic species, feeding habits, stomach contents, Tokyo Bay. INTRODUCTION that they were scavengers and predators. The bulk of their prey consisted of slow-moving and sessile Many exotic species have established natural invertebrates, with algae comprising only a small populations in Japan in recent years.