THE INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK of VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS the International Handbook of Virtual Learning Environments Volume I
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 †Working Draft‡
Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (working draft) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (working draft) W3C Working Draft 13-July-1999 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990713 (plain text, HTML gzip tar archive, HTML zip archive, PostScript, PDF) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990503 Editors: Jutta Treviranus <[email protected]> Jan Richards <[email protected]> Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> Copyright © 1999 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Abstract This document provides guidelines for Web authoring tool developers. Its purpose is two-fold: to assist developers in designing authoring tools that generate accessible Web content and to assist developers in creating an accessible authoring interface. Accessible Web content is achieved by encouraging authoring tool users ("authors") to create accessible Web content through mechanisms such as prompts, alerts, checking and repair functions, help files and automated tools. It is equally important that all people can be the authors of Web content, rather than merely recipients. It is therefore of critical importance that the tools used to create this content are themselves accessible. Adoption of these guidelines will result in the proliferation of Web pages that can be read by a broader range of readers and in authoring tools that can be used by a broader range of authors. This document is part of a series of accessibility documents published by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative. -
Report of the Arl Joint Task Force on Services to Patrons with Print Disabilities
REPORT OF THE ARL JOINT TASK FORCE ON SERVICES TO PATRONS WITH PRINT DISABILITIES November 2, 2012 Mary Case, Chair (Illinois at Chicago) Cynthia Archer (York) Nancy Baker (Iowa) Will Cross (North Carolina State) John Harwood (Penn State) Sarah Hawthorne (California, Berkeley) Kurt Herzer (Johns Hopkins) Tito Sierra (MIT) Ed Van Gemert (Wisconsin–Madison) Tom Wall (Boston College) ARL Staff Liaisons: Prue Adler Judy Ruttenberg © 2012 ARL. This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FINDINGS 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 II. PRINT DISABILITIES, LIBRARIES, AND HIGHER EDUCATION 10 SIDEBAR: ADAPTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PRINT DISABILITIES 11 PRINT DISABILITIES AND THE POPULATION 14 III. US AND CANADIAN DISABILITY POLICIES, RECENT CHALLENGES, AND US AND CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW 15 RECENT CHALLENGES TO INSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES 16 AIM COMMISSION 19 US COPYRIGHT LAW AND ISSUES FOR PRINT-DISABILITIES SERVICES 20 AUTHORS GUILD V. HATHITRUST LITIGATION 23 US ENGAGEMENT WITH WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) 24 DISABILITY AND COPYRIGHT LAW IN CANADA 24 LICENSING ISSUES 26 IV. RESEARCH LIBRARIES AND INDIVIDUALS WITH PRINT DISABILITIES 27 RETROSPECTIVE PRINT COLLECTIONS 27 LICENSED ELECTRONIC RESOURCES 28 LIBRARY WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY 29 ELECTRONIC-BOOK READERS 30 USER SERVICES 31 SIDEBAR: ONTARIO COUNCIL OF UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES (OCUL) REPOSITORY 33 V. UNIVERSAL DESIGN, INCLUSIVE DESIGN, ACCESSIBILITY, AND USABILITY 35 VI. CONCLUSION 39 VII. APPENDIX A: MODEL LICENSING LANGUAGE 40 ARL is deeply grateful to Howard P. Knopf, Counsel, Macera & Jarzyna/Moffat & Co., and Peter Jaszi, Washington College of Law, American University, for their assistance in framing the copyright discussions in this report. -
Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project
The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Reports on Digital Media and Learning | November 2008 Living and Learning with New Media: Summary of Findings from the Digital Youth Project Mizuko Ito, Heather Horst Matteo Bittanti, danah boyd, Becky Herr-Stephenson, Patricia G. Lange, C.J. Pascoe, and Laura Robinson with Sonja Baumer, Rachel Cody, Dilan Mahendran, Katynka Martínez, Dan Perkel, Christo Sims, and Lisa Tripp www.macfound.org Living and Learning with New Media | The MacArthur Foundation 1 Building the emerging field of digital media and learning The MacArthur Foundation launched its five-year, $50 million digital media and learning initiative in 2006 to help determine how digital media are changing the way young people learn, play, socialize, and participate in civic life. Answers are critical to developing educational and other social institutions that can meet the needs of this and future generations. The initiative is both marshaling what it is already known about the field and seeding innovation for continued growth. For more information, visit www.digitallearning.macfound.org. To engage in conver- sations about these projects and the field of digital learning, visit the Spotlight blog at spotlight.macfound.org. About the MacArthur Foundation The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation supports creative people and effective institutions committed to building a more just, verdant, and peaceful world. In addition to selecting the MacArthur Fellows, the Foundation works to defend human rights, advance global conservation and security, make cities bet- ter places, and understand how technology is affecting children and society. For more information or to sign up for MacArthur’s monthly electronic newsletter, visit www.macfound.org. -
Revisiting the Potential Uses of Media for Children's Education
Revisiting the Potential Uses of Media in Children’s Education Chris Berdik Winter 2020 The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop About the Author Chris Berdik is a freelance science and education journalist in Boston. A former staff editor at The Atlantic Monthly and Mother Jones, he has covered topics such as virtual schools, DNA forensics, and climate engineering for national publications, including The New York Times, Wired, Popular Science, Politico, New Scientist, and The Washington Post. Since 2015, he has also been a regular contributor to the Hechinger Report, a nonprofit education newsroom. His reporting has won grants from the Pulitzer Center on Crisis Reporting, the Society of Environmental Journalists, and the Solutions Journalism Network. In 2012, Penguin published his book Mind Over Mind, about medical and non-medical placebo effects. He is now working on a book about noise, expected to be published by Norton in 2021. A full-text PDF of this publication is available as a free download from www.joanganzcooneycenter.org. 2 CoNteNtS 4 — INTRODUCTION 6 — PART ONE Uncharted Territory? 7 What’s Been Done (Or Overdone)? 7 Where Are the Gaps? 9 — PART TWO Key Ingredients 10 Starting Points 11 Digital Do’s and Don’ts 13 — PART THREE Adults in the Room 14 Encouraging Adults 15 Desperately Seeking Curation 16 Scaffolding 17 — PART FOUR Fake News! 18 Media Literacy 19 Privacy 21 — PART FIVE Pursuing Equity 22 Big Picture 23 Small Steps 24 — CONCLUSION 26 — CONTRIBUTORS 3 INtroDuCtIoN On November 10, 1969, Big Bird took his first outsized steps down Sesame Street, introducing the world to a character that was endearingly goofy, but always eager to learn. -
DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA)
DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) Author: Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel Provided to Waterfront Toronto: February 17, 2020 Published: February 26, 2020 Summary In August 2019, Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel (DSAP) set out in a Preliminary Commentary its initial impressions, comments and questions on Sidewalk Labs’ Master Innovation Development Plan (MIDP). Since then, significantly more information has been made public about the Quayside project, including a Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) and the October 31 Threshold Issues Resolution letter. This Report is supplemental to the Preliminary Commentary, identifying areas in which the additional information has addressed (in whole or in part) concerns raised and areas in which questions or concerns remain. Panelists have also taken the opportunity to provide input into other matters relevant to their expertise, including considerations related to digital governance and to Sidewalk Labs as an innovation and funding partner. Comments include, but are not limited to: ● Overall impressions of the DIA: Overall, Panelists were generally in agreement that the DIA was a significant improvement over the MIDP and appreciated the amount of information provided in a more streamlined format. However, concerns remain - notably, that certain critical details are still outstanding. ● Digital Governance: While Panelists support the outcome of the October 31 Threshold Issues resolution, which reaffirmed that digital governance belongs exclusively in the purview of Waterfront Toronto and its government partners, the most significant outstanding issues for Panelists was generally the DSAP Supplemental Report 2 lack of a fully realized digital governance framework and the need for expedited public sector leadership. -
Considerations for Ai Fairness for People with Disabilities
AI MATTERS, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3 SEPTEMBER 2019 Considerations for AI Fairness for People with Disabilities Shari Trewin (IBM; [email protected]) Sara Basson (Google Inc.; [email protected]) Michael Muller (IBM Research; michael [email protected]) Stacy Branham (University of California, Irvine; [email protected]) Jutta Treviranus (OCAD University; [email protected]) Daniel Gruen (IBM Research; daniel [email protected]) Daniel Hebert (IBM; [email protected]) Natalia Lyckowski (IBM; [email protected]) Erich Manser (IBM; [email protected]) DOI: 10.1145/3362077.3362086 Abstract Introduction Systems that leverage Artificial Intelligence In society today, people experiencing disabil- are becoming pervasive across industry sec- ity can face discrimination. As artificial intel- tors (Costello, 2019), as are concerns that ligence solutions take on increasingly impor- these technologies can unintentionally ex- tant roles in decision-making and interaction, clude or lead to unfair outcomes for marginal- they have the potential to impact fair treatment ized populations (Bird, Hutchinson, Ken- of people with disabilities in society both pos- thapadi, Kiciman, & Mitchell, 2019)(Cutler, itively and negatively. We describe some of Pribik, & Humphrey, 2019)(IEEE & Sys- the opportunities and risks across four emerg- tems, 2019)(Kroll et al., 2016)(Lepri, Oliver, ing AI application areas: employment, educa- Letouze,´ Pentland, & Vinck, 2018). Initiatives tion, public safety, and healthcare, identified to improve AI fairness for people across racial in a workshop with participants experiencing (Hankerson et al., 2016), gender (Hamidi, a range of disabilities. In many existing situ- Scheuerman, & Branham, 2018a), and other ations, non-AI solutions are already discrimi- identities are emerging, but there has been natory, and introducing AI runs the risk of sim- relatively little work focusing on AI fairness ply perpetuating and replicating these flaws. -
Identify”-Ing a New Way of Seeing Amateurs, Moblogs, and Practices in Mobile Imaging
HEIDI RAE COOLEY “Identify”-ing A New Way of Seeing Amateurs, Moblogs, and Practices in Mobile Imaging Metal filings? Ice crystals on a bathroom window? A passing Tyrannosaurus rex? In November 2002, web designer Adam and a place via his/her MSD provide access Greenfield, coined the term ‘moblogging’.1 to not only a person’s running commentary Derived from ‘mobile’ and ‘weblog’, regarding his/her daily interactions but also, ‘moblogging’ indicated a shift, the emergence and more important to this essay, images that of a distinctive trend in weblogging (also correspond to the way s/he sees the world known as blogging), a form of electronic around him/her.4 journaling on the internet in which a person A particular moblog of interest is “Identify logs his/her thoughts and provides links to Game” located at the Textamerica website other sites to which others can respond and (identify.textamerica.com). Like the other contribute. The prefix ‘mo-’, an abbreviation moblogs hosted by Textamerica (as well as of ‘mobile’, redefined the character of other moblogs on the web), “Identify Game” blog journaling as it had been practiced posts images uploaded from MSDs and previously.2 Whereas blogging required a invites comments, or in the case of “Identify stationary point of access to the web, usually Game,” guesses, from visitors about the a desktop computer, moblogging happens images. However, the images posted to on-the-go. With mobile screenic device “Identify Game” are substantially different (MSD)—such as a camera phone or PDA with from the majority of those posted to other imaging capabilities—in hand, one can move moblogs; they demonstrate a particular about the city or other places and “post [his/ and extreme example of the imaging that her] experiences, narratively and visually, on MSDs foster. -
Accessibility and Development: Environmental Accessibility and Its Implications for Inclusive, Sustainable and Equitable Development for All
Accessibility and Development: environmental accessibility and its implications for inclusive, sustainable and equitable development for all June 2013 Accessibility and Development: environmental accessibility and its implications for inclusive, sustainable and equitable development for all 2 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which Member States of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the present publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of this review also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. -
Accessibility, Inclusion, and the Future of Learning and Work
Accessibility, Inclusion, and the Future of Learning and Work Speakers: Jutta Treviranus, Deborah Stienstra, and Dr. Mahadeo A. Sukhai Moderator: Michelle Fach Michelle Fach: Good afternoon, everyone. I am thrilled to be here today. My name is Michelle Fach and I am the Executive Director of Open Learning and Educational Support. And on behalf of myself, the university and Athol Gow, who is the co-chair of the conference committee as well as the Manager of Accessibility Services at the University of Guelph library. We would like to welcome you to the day one virtual Accessibility Conference closing panel discussion. I know that we're all very excited to be part of this. This session features three distinguished academics and researchers who will be speaking to the conference theme of Accessibility, Inclusion and the Future of Learning and Work from their respective areas of disciplinary expertise and interest. Each panelist will have a chance to speak for 10 minutes. Once all of the panelists have spoken, there will be an opportunity for you, the participants, to address the panelists with some questions. Michelle Fach: So, that will be part of the Q&A. This session is being captioned in-person by a representative from the Canadian Hearing Services, thanks to the support of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Michelle Fach: Well, we do not know definitely how the world of work and education will change after the pandemic. There is a little doubt that they will. In one year COVID 19 and the requirements for social distancing has brought about a digital transformation of learning and work, that otherwise would have been decades in the making. -
One-Size-Fits-One Inclusive Learning
One-Size-Fits-One Inclusive Learning Jutta Treviranus Inclusive Design Institute OCAD University, Toronto, Canada Abstract. The importance of education escalates in the shift to a knowledge economy. This shift also requires retooling of our education systems to support diversity. There can be no sustainable prosperity or social wellbeing unless our education systems include all members of a society. Coincidentally the digitization and networking of our social substrate also provides the mechanisms to provide more inclusive, diversity-supportive education. The paper outlines an approach to inclusive learning through personalization developed over the last decade, supported by the AccessForAll standard and most currently applied in the Open Education Resource community. Keywords: accessibility, inclusive design, universal instructional design, personalization, open education, open education resources, eLearning 1 Introduction In a knowledge economy, education and the full development of human capital becomes ever more critical. The prosperity of a society rests in large part on the educational development of its members. The emergence of the digital economy brings with it a major shift in the goals or required outcomes of education. Digitization is freeing us from the need to mass produce the equivalent of human calculators, human hard drives or standardized human robots to staff our factories or offices. As has been outlined in many discussions of learning transformation (including deep learning or 21st century learning), the new skills and knowledge of value are creativity, resourcefulness, flexibility, collaboration, communication, critical thinking and independent thought [1]. Unfortunately most education systems globally have not been retooled to nurture these skills or knowledge. We are also repeatedly reaffirming that sustainable prosperity can only be achieved when that prosperity includes all members of society [2]. -
A Brief History of Open Educational Resources T
A Brief History of Open Educational Resources T. J. Bliss* and M. Smith Hewlett Foundation *[email protected] Editors’ Commentary The Hewlett Foundation has been a key supporter of the open movement, donating over US170 million dollars over the past 15 years. In this chapter, authors T. J. Bliss and M. Smith—both of the Hewlett Foundation—ask whether this investment has been worthwhile. To answer this provocative question they trace the history of the open movement itself. They begin in the 1990s with fledging programs that formed the foundation for modern open education. From there, they cover the period they refer to as ‘open’s adolescence’ from 2004 to 2010. Finally, they discuss recent trends in open, Hewlett Foundation funding priorities, and their hopes for the future of the movement. Introduction The Open Educational Resources (OER) movement is fifteen years old. This essay reviews OER’s history, extraordinary growth, and place in education from the perspective of one current and one former employee of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.1,2 Since 2001, the Hewlett Foundation has pro- vided just over US$170 million to develop and extend the reach and effective- ness of OER. We tell the story of OER’s development, provide examples and discuss uses of OER, and sketch its potential as a powerful tool for reducing How to cite this book chapter: Bliss, T J and Smith, M. 2017. A Brief History of Open Educational Resources. In: Jhangiani, R S and Biswas-Diener, R. (eds.) Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science. -
Design for Network Communities 04.04.2003 8:58 Uhr
CHI 97: Design For Network Communities 04.04.2003 8:58 Uhr CHI 97 Electronic Publications: Papers Design For Network Communities Elizabeth D. Mynatt Xerox PARC [email protected] Annette Adler Xerox Systems Architecture [email protected] Mizuko Ito Stanford University & Institute for Research on Learning [email protected] Vicki L. O'Day Xerox PARC [email protected] ABSTRACT Collaboration has long been of considerable interest in the CHI community. This paper proposes and explores the concept of network communities as a crucial part of this discussion. Network communities are a form of technology- mediated environment that foster a sense of community among users. We consider several familiar systems and describe the shared characteristics these systems have developed to deal with critical concerns of collaboration. Based on our own experience as designers and users of a variety of network communities, we extend this initial design space along three dimensions: the articulation of a persistent sense of location, the boundary tensions between real and virtual worlds, and the emergence and evolution of community. Keywords media space, MUDs, network community, shared space, metaphor, identity, virtual world © Copyright ACM 1997 ABSTRACT Keywords INTRODUCTION http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/paper/edm.htm#U12 Seite 1 von 13 CHI 97: Design For Network Communities 04.04.2003 8:58 Uhr WHAT ARE NETWORK COMMUNITIES? Design Dimensions of Network Communities Design Examples SHARED SPACE Spaces with Boundaries Space and Social Organization Spatial Metaphors and Physical World Affordances MANAGING THE "REAL" AND THE "VIRTUAL" Identity and Representation Managing Spatial Relations Reshaping Activity EVOLVING COMMUNITIES Technosociality Learning Opportunities History and Change Future Directions CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES ENDNOTES INTRODUCTION There has long been interest in the CHI community in supporting groups of people collaborating, in particular, the informal, awareness-rich, serendipitous, and robust practices of long-term communities.