DOCSLIB.ORG

Accessibility and Development: Environmental Accessibility and Its Implications for Inclusive, Sustainable and Equitable Development for All

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Accessibility and Development: Environmental Accessibility and Its Implications for Inclusive, Sustainable and Equitable Development for All Accessibility and Development: environmental accessibility and its implications for inclusive, sustainable and equitable development for all June 2013 Accessibility and Development: environmental accessibility and its implications for inclusive, sustainable and equitable development for all 2 Department of Economic and Social Affairs The Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) of the United Nations Secretariat is a vital interface between global policies in the economic, social and environmental spheres and national action. The Department works in three main interlinked areas: (i) it compiles, generates and analyses a wide range of economic, social and environmental data and information on which Member States of the United Nations draw to review common problems and to take stock of policy options; (ii) it facilitates the negotiations of Member States in many intergovernmental bodies on joint courses of action to address ongoing or emerging global challenges; and (iii) it advises interested Governments on the ways and means of translating policy frameworks developed in United Nations conferences and summits into programmes at the country level and, through technical assistance, helps build national capacities. Note The designations employed and the presentation of the material in the present publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitations of its frontiers. The term “country” as used in the text of this review also refers, as appropriate, to territories or areas. The designations of country groups in the text and the tables are intended solely for statistical or analytical convenience and do not necessarily express a judgment about the stage reached by a particular country or area in the development process. Mention of the names of firms and commercial products does not imply the endorsement of the United Nations. Symbols of United Nations documents are composed of capital letters combined with figures. 3 Acknowledgements 1/ This paper entitled “Environmental accessibility and its implications for inclusive, sustainable and equitable development for all”, prepared by Mr. Clinton E. Rapley, is in collaboration with United Nations agencies, Disabled Persons Organizations (DPOs) and other NGOs, as well as disability and development communities from around the world. In particular, we would like to thank the following: * Participants in the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Accessibility: Innovative and Cost-effective Approaches for Inclusive and Accessible Development, organized by DESA in collaboration with the World Bank, Washington D.C, 28-30 June 2010 1; * Participants in the United Nations Expert Group Meeting on Building Inclusive Societies and Development through Promotion of Accessible Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs): Emerging issues and trends, organized by DESA in collaboration with the Nippon Foundation and United Nations Information Center, Tokyo, 19 – 21 April 2012 2. ________________________________ 1/ The paper is prepared based on outcome of the two recent United Nations Experts Group Meeting on accessibility issues and re-issued as a resource reference for the High Level Meeting on disability and development and ongoing discussions concerning Post-2015 Development Frameworks and Disability. Unless stated otherwise, the views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not represent the official position of the United Nations. Products and service marks are presented for reference only and do not constitute endorsement by the United Nations. Product and service names are the property of the respective owner or copy right holder. 1 http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?navid=46&pid=1596 2 http://www.un.org/disabilities/default.asp?id=1516 4 Executive Summary The paper reviews (a) norms and standards related to accessibility in the built environment, transport systems, and information and communications technologies, and (b) international development policies and programmes with reference to the objectives of sustainability, equity and inclusiveness. The paper notes that environmental accessibility is a major theme in international disability instruments, in the light of its contribution to promoting opportunities for all to participate on the basis of equality in development. Policy concern with accessibility remains, however, elusive in mainstream development strategies, policies and programmes. The paper proposes that one way to address environmental accessibility as a mainstream development issue is to recognize that environmental accessibility is a global public good, which provides universal benefits, covers multiple groups of countries and all populations. Accessible and usable environments are non-excludable - accessibility benefits all - and non-rivalrous – use by one person does not detract from use by others. The select review of national and regional experience in promotion and provision of accessible and usable products, services and environments indicates that a considerable and continuously expanding body of knowledge and extensive range of skills is available in countries. The challenge is to promote widely the view that provision of accessible and usable products, services and environments is an investment that benefits all and is reflected in value chains rather than to be viewed as social consumption for targeted populations. The discussion of environmental accessibility issues and options for the way forward examines the role of policies, structures, technologies, and production and distribution processes. The discussion concludes with a short list of key principles to reinforce accessibility and disability-inclusive concerns in mainstream development. 5 Table of Contents Page I Introduction 9 Norms and standards related to environmental accessibility and II 10 development A Accessibility as a human right 10 Environmental accessibility and advancement of persons with B 12 disabilities C Accessibility in the context of international development 19 International development policies, strategies and programmes at a D 26 crossroads E Accessibility: a global public good 27 Accessibility in policy and practice: select review of issues and trends III related to the built environment, transport and to information and 32 communication technologies A Introduction 32 Review of accessibility in the built environment, transport and public B 37 facilities 1 Top-down approaches to accessible environments 38 Bottom-up approaches and local initiative in promoting accessible 2 46 environments 3 Comparative study of Universal Design in practice 48 International standards related to accessibility in built environments, C 56 transport and public facilities Role of non-binding instruments: Standard Rules on Equalization of 1 56 Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and global 2 59 accessibility benchmarks Selected regional and global standards on accessible built 3 61 environments Review of accessibility in the field of information and communication D 83 technologies 1 Internet: a brief introduction 87 2 Technical guidance: Internet architecture, protocols and standards 90 3 Internet governance: a brief review 96 Selected trends in information and communication structures and 4 100 technologies 5 Implications for provision of accessible and usable Internet resources 108 Select review of regulatory guidance and technical standards 6 115 concerning accessibility on the Internet Accessibility in the general systems of society: issues and options for IV 124 the way forward A Options for post-2015 international development frameworks 124 B A global public good 126 C Capacity building, and engaging and empowering end users 134 Concluding remark: reconsidering accessibility in the context of V 138 mainstream development 6 I. Introduction This paper considers accessibility in the context of development. The United Nations General Assembly has long identified “accessibility” as a priority in measures promoting equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities.3 A substantial body of data documents the universal benefits that accessible and usable environments provide all populations. 4 The paper reviews and discusses accessibility in the built environment, transportation systems and public facilities, and in information and communication technologies. Assessments of issues and trends are forward looking and focus on international development agenda for the period beyond 2015, the end point of the period identified by the General Assembly to promote and implement and the Millennium Development Goals. The paper considers options to incorporate environmental accessibility in mainstream development to further achievement of the sustainable, inclusive and equitable development and poverty eradication priorities identified by the General Assembly 5 for all. The paper uses the concise and pragmatic definition of “accessibility” the Secretary-General presented in his report to the General Assembly on advancement of persons with disabilities: “Accessibility refers to provision of ‘flexibility’ to accommodate each user’s needs and preferences.” 6 The paper has three main sections. The first section reviews international norms related to environmental accessibility and advancement of persons with disabilities in development, and examines
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 †Working Draft‡
    Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (working draft) Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (working draft) W3C Working Draft 13-July-1999 This version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990713 (plain text, HTML gzip tar archive, HTML zip archive, PostScript, PDF) Latest version: http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-AUTOOLS Previous version: http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/WAI-AUTOOLS-19990503 Editors: Jutta Treviranus <[email protected]> Jan Richards <[email protected]> Ian Jacobs <[email protected]> Charles McCathieNevile <[email protected]> Copyright © 1999 W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. Abstract This document provides guidelines for Web authoring tool developers. Its purpose is two-fold: to assist developers in designing authoring tools that generate accessible Web content and to assist developers in creating an accessible authoring interface. Accessible Web content is achieved by encouraging authoring tool users ("authors") to create accessible Web content through mechanisms such as prompts, alerts, checking and repair functions, help files and automated tools. It is equally important that all people can be the authors of Web content, rather than merely recipients. It is therefore of critical importance that the tools used to create this content are themselves accessible. Adoption of these guidelines will result in the proliferation of Web pages that can be read by a broader range of readers and in authoring tools that can be used by a broader range of authors. This document is part of a series of accessibility documents published by the W3C Web Accessibility Initiative.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Arl Joint Task Force on Services to Patrons with Print Disabilities
    REPORT OF THE ARL JOINT TASK FORCE ON SERVICES TO PATRONS WITH PRINT DISABILITIES November 2, 2012 Mary Case, Chair (Illinois at Chicago) Cynthia Archer (York) Nancy Baker (Iowa) Will Cross (North Carolina State) John Harwood (Penn State) Sarah Hawthorne (California, Berkeley) Kurt Herzer (Johns Hopkins) Tito Sierra (MIT) Ed Van Gemert (Wisconsin–Madison) Tom Wall (Boston College) ARL Staff Liaisons: Prue Adler Judy Ruttenberg © 2012 ARL. This report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution­ Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 FINDINGS 6 RECOMMENDATIONS 8 II. PRINT DISABILITIES, LIBRARIES, AND HIGHER EDUCATION 10 SIDEBAR: ADAPTIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR PRINT DISABILITIES 11 PRINT DISABILITIES AND THE POPULATION 14 III. US AND CANADIAN DISABILITY POLICIES, RECENT CHALLENGES, AND US AND CANADIAN COPYRIGHT LAW 15 RECENT CHALLENGES TO INSTITUTIONAL PRACTICES 16 AIM COMMISSION 19 US COPYRIGHT LAW AND ISSUES FOR PRINT-DISABILITIES SERVICES 20 AUTHORS GUILD V. HATHITRUST LITIGATION 23 US ENGAGEMENT WITH WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION (WIPO) 24 DISABILITY AND COPYRIGHT LAW IN CANADA 24 LICENSING ISSUES 26 IV. RESEARCH LIBRARIES AND INDIVIDUALS WITH PRINT DISABILITIES 27 RETROSPECTIVE PRINT COLLECTIONS 27 LICENSED ELECTRONIC RESOURCES 28 LIBRARY WEBSITE ACCESSIBILITY 29 ELECTRONIC-BOOK READERS 30 USER SERVICES 31 SIDEBAR: ONTARIO COUNCIL OF UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES (OCUL) REPOSITORY 33 V. UNIVERSAL DESIGN, INCLUSIVE DESIGN, ACCESSIBILITY, AND USABILITY 35 VI. CONCLUSION 39 VII. APPENDIX A: MODEL LICENSING LANGUAGE 40 ARL is deeply grateful to Howard P. Knopf, Counsel, Macera & Jarzyna/Moffat & Co., and Peter Jaszi, Washington College of Law, American University, for their assistance in framing the copyright discussions in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Certification of Quality and Safety Standards
    REPORT ON THE CERTIFICATION OF QUALITY AND SAFETY STANDARDS July 2010 REPORT ON THE CERTIFICATION OF QUALITY AND SAFETY STANDARDS Certification of quality and safety standards plays an important role in the economy, since it provides assurance that products and services conform to certain standards and specifications. During the last decade, certification services have been subject to several Resolutions of the Spanish Competition Commission and the former Spanish Competition Tribunal. This Report analyses the regulatory framework of these services and explores to what extent certain practices which have been subject to Resolutions still pose relevant problems in terms of competition. In addition, it identifies several factors which may restrict competition and proposes some recommendations to overcome these deficiencies. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 1 I. INTRODUCTION. ..................................................................................................... 7 II. THE CERTIFICATION ACTIVITY ............................................................................ 9 II.1 Standards ......................................................................................................... 9 II.2 Certification bodies........................................................................................ 16 II.3 Characteristics of the market ........................................................................ 23 III. RESTRICTIONS OF COMPETITION
    [Show full text]
  • DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA)
    DSAP Supplemental Report on the Sidewalk Labs Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) Author: Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel Provided to Waterfront Toronto: February 17, 2020 Published: February 26, 2020 Summary In August 2019, Waterfront Toronto’s Digital Strategy Advisory Panel (DSAP) set out in a Preliminary Commentary its initial impressions, comments and questions on Sidewalk Labs’ Master Innovation Development Plan (MIDP). Since then, significantly more information has been made public about the Quayside project, including a Digital Innovation Appendix (DIA) and the October 31 Threshold Issues Resolution letter. This Report is supplemental to the Preliminary Commentary, identifying areas in which the additional information has addressed (in whole or in part) concerns raised and areas in which questions or concerns remain. Panelists have also taken the opportunity to provide input into other matters relevant to their expertise, including considerations related to digital governance and to Sidewalk Labs as an innovation and funding partner. Comments include, but are not limited to: ● Overall impressions of the DIA: Overall, Panelists were generally in agreement that the DIA was a significant improvement over the MIDP and appreciated the amount of information provided in a more streamlined format. However, concerns remain - notably, that certain critical details are still outstanding. ● Digital Governance: While Panelists support the outcome of the October 31 Threshold Issues resolution, which reaffirmed that digital governance belongs exclusively in the purview of Waterfront Toronto and its government partners, the most significant outstanding issues for Panelists was generally the DSAP Supplemental Report 2 lack of a fully realized digital governance framework and the need for expedited public sector leadership.
    [Show full text]
  • Considerations for Ai Fairness for People with Disabilities
    AI MATTERS, VOLUME 5, ISSUE 3 SEPTEMBER 2019 Considerations for AI Fairness for People with Disabilities Shari Trewin (IBM; [email protected]) Sara Basson (Google Inc.; [email protected]) Michael Muller (IBM Research; michael [email protected]) Stacy Branham (University of California, Irvine; [email protected]) Jutta Treviranus (OCAD University; [email protected]) Daniel Gruen (IBM Research; daniel [email protected]) Daniel Hebert (IBM; [email protected]) Natalia Lyckowski (IBM; [email protected]) Erich Manser (IBM; [email protected]) DOI: 10.1145/3362077.3362086 Abstract Introduction Systems that leverage Artificial Intelligence In society today, people experiencing disabil- are becoming pervasive across industry sec- ity can face discrimination. As artificial intel- tors (Costello, 2019), as are concerns that ligence solutions take on increasingly impor- these technologies can unintentionally ex- tant roles in decision-making and interaction, clude or lead to unfair outcomes for marginal- they have the potential to impact fair treatment ized populations (Bird, Hutchinson, Ken- of people with disabilities in society both pos- thapadi, Kiciman, & Mitchell, 2019)(Cutler, itively and negatively. We describe some of Pribik, & Humphrey, 2019)(IEEE & Sys- the opportunities and risks across four emerg- tems, 2019)(Kroll et al., 2016)(Lepri, Oliver, ing AI application areas: employment, educa- Letouze,´ Pentland, & Vinck, 2018). Initiatives tion, public safety, and healthcare, identified to improve AI fairness for people across racial in a workshop with participants experiencing (Hankerson et al., 2016), gender (Hamidi, a range of disabilities. In many existing situ- Scheuerman, & Branham, 2018a), and other ations, non-AI solutions are already discrimi- identities are emerging, but there has been natory, and introducing AI runs the risk of sim- relatively little work focusing on AI fairness ply perpetuating and replicating these flaws.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility, Inclusion, and the Future of Learning and Work
    Accessibility, Inclusion, and the Future of Learning and Work Speakers: Jutta Treviranus, Deborah Stienstra, and Dr. Mahadeo A. Sukhai Moderator: Michelle Fach Michelle Fach: Good afternoon, everyone. I am thrilled to be here today. My name is Michelle Fach and I am the Executive Director of Open Learning and Educational Support. And on behalf of myself, the university and Athol Gow, who is the co-chair of the conference committee as well as the Manager of Accessibility Services at the University of Guelph library. We would like to welcome you to the day one virtual Accessibility Conference closing panel discussion. I know that we're all very excited to be part of this. This session features three distinguished academics and researchers who will be speaking to the conference theme of Accessibility, Inclusion and the Future of Learning and Work from their respective areas of disciplinary expertise and interest. Each panelist will have a chance to speak for 10 minutes. Once all of the panelists have spoken, there will be an opportunity for you, the participants, to address the panelists with some questions. Michelle Fach: So, that will be part of the Q&A. This session is being captioned in-person by a representative from the Canadian Hearing Services, thanks to the support of the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. Michelle Fach: Well, we do not know definitely how the world of work and education will change after the pandemic. There is a little doubt that they will. In one year COVID 19 and the requirements for social distancing has brought about a digital transformation of learning and work, that otherwise would have been decades in the making.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Size-Fits-One Inclusive Learning
    One-Size-Fits-One Inclusive Learning Jutta Treviranus Inclusive Design Institute OCAD University, Toronto, Canada Abstract. The importance of education escalates in the shift to a knowledge economy. This shift also requires retooling of our education systems to support diversity. There can be no sustainable prosperity or social wellbeing unless our education systems include all members of a society. Coincidentally the digitization and networking of our social substrate also provides the mechanisms to provide more inclusive, diversity-supportive education. The paper outlines an approach to inclusive learning through personalization developed over the last decade, supported by the AccessForAll standard and most currently applied in the Open Education Resource community. Keywords: accessibility, inclusive design, universal instructional design, personalization, open education, open education resources, eLearning 1 Introduction In a knowledge economy, education and the full development of human capital becomes ever more critical. The prosperity of a society rests in large part on the educational development of its members. The emergence of the digital economy brings with it a major shift in the goals or required outcomes of education. Digitization is freeing us from the need to mass produce the equivalent of human calculators, human hard drives or standardized human robots to staff our factories or offices. As has been outlined in many discussions of learning transformation (including deep learning or 21st century learning), the new skills and knowledge of value are creativity, resourcefulness, flexibility, collaboration, communication, critical thinking and independent thought [1]. Unfortunately most education systems globally have not been retooled to nurture these skills or knowledge. We are also repeatedly reaffirming that sustainable prosperity can only be achieved when that prosperity includes all members of society [2].
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Open Educational Resources T
    A Brief History of Open Educational Resources T. J. Bliss* and M. Smith Hewlett Foundation *[email protected] Editors’ Commentary The Hewlett Foundation has been a key supporter of the open movement, donating over US170 million dollars over the past 15 years. In this chapter, authors T. J. Bliss and M. Smith—both of the Hewlett Foundation—ask whether this investment has been worthwhile. To answer this provocative question they trace the history of the open movement itself. They begin in the 1990s with fledging programs that formed the foundation for modern open education. From there, they cover the period they refer to as ‘open’s adolescence’ from 2004 to 2010. Finally, they discuss recent trends in open, Hewlett Foundation funding priorities, and their hopes for the future of the movement. Introduction The Open Educational Resources (OER) movement is fifteen years old. This essay reviews OER’s history, extraordinary growth, and place in education from the perspective of one current and one former employee of the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.1,2 Since 2001, the Hewlett Foundation has pro- vided just over US$170 million to develop and extend the reach and effective- ness of OER. We tell the story of OER’s development, provide examples and discuss uses of OER, and sketch its potential as a powerful tool for reducing How to cite this book chapter: Bliss, T J and Smith, M. 2017. A Brief History of Open Educational Resources. In: Jhangiani, R S and Biswas-Diener, R. (eds.) Open: The Philosophy and Practices that are Revolutionizing Education and Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Jutta Treviranus: Background For
    Jutta Treviranus: Background for ECM Short Biography: Jutta Treviranus is the Director of the Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) and professor in the faculty of Design at OCAD University in Toronto http://idrc.ocad.ca . With it’s origins in the ATRC established in 1993, the IDRC is an internationally recognized center of expertise in the inclusive design of emerging information and communication technology and practices. Jutta also heads the Inclusive Design Institute a multi‐university regional centre of expertise. Jutta has led many international multi‐partner research networks that have created broadly implemented technical innovations that support inclusion. Jutta and her team have pioneered personalization as an approach to accessibility in the digital domain. Her team also leads many international open source projects that attempt to infuse inclusive user experience design sensibilities into open source networks. She has played a leading role in developing accessibility legislation, standards and specifications internationally (including WAI ATAG, IMS AccessForAll, ISO 24751, and AODA Information and Communication). Jutta established and directs a graduate program in Inclusive Design at OCAD U. She is also a member of a number of key advisory panels nationally and internationally that advance approaches to equitable access to the digital domain. Work in the field of accessibility: As indicated in my biography I have worked in the field of accessibility for more than 30 years. Since the emergence of personal computers I have conducted research and development, policy development, educationanddirect service to ensure that computers, networks, digital content and applications are accessible to people with disabilitiesand to harness computers to address accessibility barriers faced by people with disabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • International Standardisation in the Field of Renewable Energy IRENA REP
    T IRENA R International Renewable Energy Agency O International Standardisation in the Field of Renewable Energy IRENA REP ROL NT O C Y y T I L D A U E Q y V A PP RO March 2013 Copyright (c) IRENA 2013 Unless otherwise indicated, material in this publication may be used freely, shared or reprinted, so long as IRENA is acknowledged as the source. About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) is an intergovernmental organisa- tion that supports countries in their transition to a sustainable energy future, and serves as the principal platform for international cooperation, a centre of excellence, and a re- pository of policy, technology, resource and fi nancial knowledge on renewable energy. IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org. Acknowledgements The production of this report was led by Gideon Richards of Consulting With Purpose Ltd (CWP) and supported by Kyung-Jin Boo of the Seoul National University (SNU). The paper benefitted from internal IRENA reviews, discussions with participants at the workshop on international standardisation for renewable energy hosted by IRENA on 24 October 2012, as well as the valuable comments by Gabriel Barta and Françoise Rauser of the Inter- national Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and Müge Dolun of the United Nations Indus- trial Development Organization (UNIDO). For further information or to provide feedback, please contact Francisco Boshell, IRENA Innovation and Technology Centre, Robert-Schuman-Platz 3, 53175 Bonn, Germany; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Addressing the Imagination Gap Through STEAMM D and Indigenous Knowledge
    PAPER Addressing the imagination gap through STEAMM+D COLLOQUIUM and indigenous knowledge Sara Diamonda,1 aVisual Analytics Laboratory, OCAD University, Toronto, ON M5T 1W1, Canada Edited by Ben Shneiderman, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Eva Tardos November 5, 2018 (received for review May 21, 2018) Alex Manu describes an “imagination gap,” that is, “the gap be- Methods ” tween current capability and future possibility [Manu A (2006) This paper begins with a discussion of science, technology, engineering, arts, The Imagination Challenge: Strategic Foresight and Innovation in math, medicine, and design (STEAMM+D) themes and provides case studies the Global Economy]. Merriam-Webster defines imagination as and lessons drawn from several decades of work. A discussion of Indigenous “the act of forming a mental image of something not present to knowledge embedded in an integrated approach to the arts and sciences the senses or never before wholly perceived in reality”; imagina- follows. I write this paper from the perspective of a non-Indigenous person tion combines “creative ability” and “resourcefulness” [Merriam- and draw on referenced sources by Indigenous thinkers, researchers, and Webster (2018) Imagination. Merriam-Webster Dictionary Online. makers. I appreciate the advice of Julie Nagam, Chair of Indigenous Art in North America, University of Winnipeg (Winnipeg, MB, Canada), who acted Available at https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/imagination]. as a critical reader of this paper (9). STEAMM+D and Indigenous knowledge This paper considers two interdisciplinary fields in which distinct are potentially complementary approaches, yet the divergences in thinking “ ” approaches have sought a solution to the imagination gap and are also challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Jutta Treviranus
    Court File No.223/21 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (Divisional Court) BETWEEN: DAVID DANESHVAR Applicant - and - HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN IN RIGHT OF ONTARIO AS REPRESENTED BY THE MINISTER OF HEALTH, and the HONOURABLE CHRISTINE ELLIOTT, MINISTER OF HEALTH for the PROVINCE OF ONTARIO Respondents AFFIDAVIT OF DR. JUTTA TREVIRANUS (Affirmed March 16, 2021) I, Dr. Jutta Treviranus, of the City of Toronto, in the Province of Ontario, AFFIRM AND SAY: About Me I. I am the founder and Director of the Inclusive Design Research Centre (IDRC) operating out of the OCAD University, previously the Adaptive Technology Resource Centre ("A TRC") at the University of Toronto. I am also a full Professor at OCAD University and founder of a graduate program in inclusive design, my curriculum vitae is attached as Exhibit "1 ". 2. I founded the Centre in 1993 to proactively work to ensure that emerging technical systems and their associated practices consider the full range of human difference and are accessible to all; through research, development, education, proactive design consultation and direct service. 1 3. As is delineated in my CV at Exhibit "l", I have been an expert advisor in drafting and implementing Web accessibility standards, specifications and guidelines since the beginning of the Web. I have been chair, project editor or contributing editor in many of the Web accessibility standards. I have also consulted with the Federal and Ontario Governments and participated in a number of education, advisory and policy initiatives addressing the accessibility of Government Web space. 4. As reflected in the Ontario Government Website, I helped draft the seed original Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Information and Communication standards, served a term on the Minister's Advisory Committee and Chaired the Digital Inclusion Task Force of the Information and Communication Standards Development Committee.
    [Show full text]