The Meanings of Boundaries: Contested Landscapes of Resource Use in Malawi Peter A. Walker Department of Geography, University of Oregon Eugene, OR 97403-1251
[email protected] Fax: (541) 346-2067 Pauline E. Peters Harvard Institute for International Development, Harvard University Cambridge, MA 02138
[email protected] Fax: (617) 495-0527 Stream: Multiple Commons Discipline: Geography/Anthropology This paper examines the changing meanings of boundaries that demarcate community, private, and public land in Malawi and their roles in shaping resource use. Boundaries have long been a central concept in many social science disciplines, and recently considerable attention has been given to the ways that boundaries—whether physical or socio-cultural—are socially constructed and contested. In some cases landscapes are said to reflect multiple overlapping or multi-layered boundaries asserted by competing social groups. In other cases boundaries are said to be blurred, or even erased, through social contests and competing discourses. The authors of this paper, one a geographer, one an anthropologist, suggest that such choices in analytical language and metaphors tend to obscure certain key social dynamics in which boundaries play a central role. Specifically, the paper argues that in the two case studies presented from southern and central Malawi, social contests focus not on competing (‘overlapping’, or ‘multi-layered’) sets of spatially-defined boundaries but over the meanings of de jure boundaries that demarcate community, private, and state land. In asserting rights to use resources on private and state land, villagers do not seek to shift or eliminate the boundaries marking community and private or state land or to assert alternative sets of spatial boundaries.