DOCSLIB.ORG

Rosslyn Multi-Modal Transportation Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Rosslyn Multi-Modal Transportation Study September 2012 – FINAL DRAFT Arlington County DES – Transportation Planning Photo: Courtesy of Rosslyn BID Ross Table of Contents Executive Summary I. Study Overview II. Development and Travel Demand Forecast III. Existing Conditions and Preliminary Recommendations: Chapter A. - Rosslyn Streets Chapter B. – Transit in Rosslyn Chapter C. – Walking in Rosslyn Chapter D. – Bicycling in Rosslyn Chapter E. – Rosslyn Parking and Curb Space Management Chapter F. – Transportation Demand Management IV. Summary of Transportation Recommendations List of Related Studies and Plans This study was written during the summer of 2011, by staff from the Arlington County DES, Transportation Division. Mapping Appendices assistance provided by the Arlington DES, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Office. Development and demographic data provided by the Arlington DCPHD, Planning Research and Analysis Team (PRAT). 1 can spend more time enjoying the attractions of the region and current four-lanes in a single direction to better balanced two- Executive Summary: less time traveling. Arlington County seeks to continually directional streets. Sidewalks, crossings, curb space assignment expand the availability of transportation options, serving more and streetscape should also be revised. Removal of the existing Introduction: travelers as the region continues to grow. Fort Myer underpass of Wilson Boulevard could help to transform the Rosslyn street system and would allow for The Rosslyn Multimodal Transportation Study is an evaluation of One noteworthy transportation concern is how to transition reallocation of considerable street space to other uses. As the existing and planned transportation facilities, services and Rosslyn from a community with significant cut-through vehicle financial costs and disruptions of that change may prove operations for Rosslyn over the next 20 years. The principle traffic to a destination. The one-way couplet of Lynn Street and substantial, it is advised that a full engineering study be impetus of this study is the rapidly changing scale of Fort Myer Drive encourages the movement of vehicle traffic undertaken to ascertain costs and develop a potential development occurring in Rosslyn and the increased demand this through the core of Rosslyn and creates heavy directional flow of reconstruction plan. development places on all modal elements of the existing Rosslyn traffic during the peak periods, blocking of intersections and transportation system. This study catalogues and assesses the pedestrian crossing conflicts. The change of Lynn Street and Fort In addition to Fort Myer Drive and Lynn Street, many of the other basic framework of the Rosslyn multimodal transportation Myer Drive to two-way operation is intended to provide better streets in Rosslyn can be remade as better-functioning urban system including: streets, public transportation, bicycle facilities, curb space access that supports transit, improve vehicle streets. Each of the primary streets within Rosslyn has been pedestrian facilities, parking and curb space management, and circulation and turning movement options at the core of Rosslyn, evaluated as part of this study and potential changes have been Transportation Demand Management (TDM) and identifies incorporate bicycle access and advance safety and access recommended as documented in the Street Cross-Sections. New deficiencies along with opportunities for improvements to the improvements for pedestrians. Re-balancing the right-of-way is street sections would enhance the street grid and significantly system. Recommended improvements to Rosslyn’s an integral part to improving Rosslyn’s sense of place, supports improve vehicular circulation within Rosslyn by breaking up transportation system are based on and consistent with Arlington the development of a multi-modal transportation system and is existing super blocks. County’s Master Transportation Plan (MTP). The study is the tradeoff between mobility and accessibility. intended to inform the transportation component of the new Transit: Rosslyn Sector Plan Addendum to be undertaken in 2011-12. Primary Recommendations: Rosslyn’s economic development has been heavily dependent upon the wealth of transit services that are provided within the Recommendations made in the study should act as a starting area. In addition to having one of the busiest Metrorail stations in point for discussion during the larger sector plan process. Streets: Virginia, five jurisdictions currently provide regular bus service The Rosslyn street network was developed in the1960’s with the to Rosslyn. The two blocks of N. Moore Street, between Wilson Arlington’s integration of transportation into all aspects of urban intent of providing efficient vehicular flow through the Boulevard and Lee Highway act as Rosslyn’s transit center where development emphasizes accessibility options and gives priority neighborhood to Washington, D.C. and the regional highways. more than 40,000 transit trips a day are accessed. to the movement of people rather than vehicles. As part of this Rosslyn’s streets lack many of the characteristics that engender a strategy, Arlington focuses high-density commercial and comfortable and enjoyable walking environment. On many Currently a project is underway to construct a new entrance to residential development around Metrorail stations and corridors blocks, sidewalks are too narrow for pedestrians and commerce, the Rosslyn Metro station via three new, high-speed, high- with extensive transit service, while maintaining lower-density street-side loading overwhelms pedestrian areas, sidewalk capacity elevators in the Central Place plaza. The existing station residential neighborhoods elsewhere. amenities are limited, and traffic volumes and speeds are entrance will also be spruced up and a new ADA-accessible route intimidating. to the station from Fort Myer Drive will be provided. The Arlington’s vision of transportation is a system that provides Rosslyn Commuter Store will be relocated to a spot adjacent to modal choices and equal access to all users. It advocates the In recent years, some improvements have been made that have the Metro station entrance and the bus stops and passenger concentration of investment on projects that yield the greatest greatly enhanced the Rosslyn streetscape. Additional waiting areas along Moore Street will be enhanced. good not only from a transportation standpoint, but also in terms improvements are needed both to the sidewalks and streetscape of overall quality of life. The vision includes walkable, mixed-use and to the overall street network. Chief recommendations of this Future transit service improvements including additional ART neighborhoods well served by public transportation and study are that Rosslyn’s primary north-south streets, Lynn Street bus service and an increase in the frequency of the Metrobus pedestrian facilities in which residents, employees and visitors and Fort Myer Drive, should be rebuilt to switch them from their Route 38B are envisioned. Metrorail overcrowding on the Orange 2 Line is proposed to be addressed by an increase in the use of 8-car is close to several regional trails but it can be somewhat difficult plan conditions. Such arrangement will help keep construction trains. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to access due to barriers such as highways and a lack of desirable costs down while still ensuring that adequate parking is supplied. (WMATA) also has rerouted some Blue Line trains to permit on-street connections. The study identifies where bicycle lanes Shared-parking should also provide more opportunities for more Orange and eventually Silver line trains to pass through the and other improvements can be added to complete the network of evening/late night and weekend garage openings to help support Potomac River tunnel. The Blue Line service change has been bike facilities in Rosslyn and provide better access to the Potomac emerging restaurant and theatre activities in Rosslyn. In addition addressed in part through the addition of new Metrobus service River bridges, and regional trails. As Rosslyn is within a few to increasing the utilization of shared-parking arrangements, the between Rosslyn and Crystal City. Blue Line trains continue to miles of the Washington DC core, the entire Rosslyn-Ballston minimum parking requirements for new office and hotel service Rosslyn, but at a reduced frequency. The addition of the corridor and the Pentagon City/Crystal City area, bicycling can developments should be reduced. Reducing the number of new Silver Line will further reduce Blue Line frequency. These new be a very practical means of travel for persons based in Rosslyn. parking spaces in Rosslyn will help to discourage single-occupant services place additional demand on central Rosslyn to driving as well as reduce the cost of new development projects. accommodate more bus stops. Reconfiguration of Lynn Street Parking requirement reductions should be implemented along and Fort Myer Drive can create opportunities for additonal bus with enhancements to the Transportation Demand Management stops and passenger loading. Current and expanded commuter (TDM) programs implemented by those developments. bus service from Loudoun and Prince William counties could also be better integrated into the transit center by relocating to new Curb space is a highly desired amenity across Arlington and stops on Lynn Street and Fort Myer Drive. especially in Rosslyn.
Recommended publications
  • A History of Residential Development, Planning, and Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia

    A History of Residential Development, Planning, and Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia

    A History of Residential Development, Planning, and Zoning in Arlington County, Virginia April 2020 Acknowledgements This report would not have been possible without the guidance and feedback from Arlington County staff, including Mr. Russell Danao-Schroeder, Ms. Kellie Brown, Mr. Timothy Murphy, and Mr. Richard Tucker. We appreciate your time and insights. Prepared by Dr. Shelley Mastran Jennifer Burch Melissa Cameron Randy Cole Maggie Cooper Andrew De Luca Jose Delcid Dinah Girma Owain James Lynda Ramirez-Blust Noah Solomon Alex Wilkerson Madeline Youngren Cover Image Source: https://www.flickr.com/photos/arlingtonva/29032004740/in/album-72157672142122411/ i Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................................................................................ i Prepared by ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................................................................................. ii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................................................................... iii Key Findings ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Arlington Memorial Bridge Adjacent to the Base of the Lincoln Memorial

    Arlington Memorial Bridge Adjacent to the Base of the Lincoln Memorial

    Arlington Memorial Bridge HAER No. DC-7 Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, VA. Washington District of Columbia PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA Historic American Engineering Record National Park Service Department of the Interior Washington, DC 20013-7127 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ARLINGTON MEMORIAL BRIDGE HAER No. DC-7 Location: Adjacent to the base of the Lincoln Memorial, Washington, D.C., spanning the Potomac River to Arlington Cemetery, Arlington, VA. UTM: 18/321680/4306600 Quad.: Washington West Date of Construction: Designed 1929, Completed 1932 Architects: McKim, Mead and White, New York, New York; William Mitchell Kendall, Designer Engineer: John L. Nagle, W.J. Douglas, Consulting Engineer, Joseph P. Strauss, Bascule Span Engineer Contractor: Forty contractors under the supervision of the Arlington Bridge Commission Present Owner: National Capital Region National Park Service Department of the Interior Present Use: Vehicular and pedestrian bridge Significance: As the final link in the chain of monuments which start at the Capitol building, the Arlington Memorial Bridge connects the Mall in Washington, D.C. with Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia. Designed to connect, both physically and symbolically, the North and the South, this bridge, as designed in the Neoclassical style, complements the other monumental buildings in Washington such as the White House, the Lincoln Memorial, and the Jefferson Memorial. Memorial Bridge was designed by William Mitchell Kendall while in the employ of McKim, Mead and White, a prominent architectural firm based in New York City. Although designed and built almost thirty years after the McMillan Commission had been disbanded, this structure reflects the original intention of the Commission which was to build a memorial bridge on this site which would join the North and South.
  • Fy 2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Plan

    Fy 2021 Adopted Capital Improvement Plan

    FY 2021 ADOPTED CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Arlington will be a diverse and inclusive world-class urban community with secure, attractive residential and commercial neighborhoods where people unite to form a caring, learning, participating, sustainable community in which each person is important. SUMMARY OF FY 2021 CAPITAL PLAN For FY 2021, the County proposed and adopted a one-year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). As the County Manager stated in June 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has created far too much uncertainty in terms of an unstable financial outlook, an increased need for food, housing and health needs, and supporting the business community and workforce. The program presented in the adopted CIP considered the uncertain fiscal horizon of the County and focuses on essential investments with a one-year CIP. As part of the adopted FY 2021 budget, the County Board maintained the existing real estate tax rate at $1.026 per $100 dollars of assessed value (including stormwater tax). The adopted program centers on projects already in progress, projects that are critical to improving County infrastructure and assets, projects that meet legal and regulatory requirements, technology investments and commitments to invest in the stormwater infrastructure system. Highlights of the adopted CIP include: • Fire Station Renovations – The fire stations will be renovated to accommodate additional staff. Renovations include additional storage, living space, locker room facilities and upgrading decontamination areas. • Body Worn Cameras – The new technology will implement Body Worn Cameras for the Police Department and Sheriff’s Office in addition to initial upgrades to four courtrooms to support the program. • Trail Bridge and Modernization Program – This ongoing program will address the replacement of the pedestrian bridges in Glencarlyn and Lubber Run parks, which were destroyed in the July 2019 storm.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    20130904 Table of Contents Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Highlights from the Final Report ................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Supplemental Report Objectives .................................................................................. 1-6 2.0 Refined Multimodal Package ............................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Roadway Refinement ..................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Transit Refinement ......................................................................................................... 2-5 2.3 Refined Package Model Results ................................................................................... 2-8 2.4 Peak-Only Tolls versus All Day Tolls .......................................................................... 2-20 2.5 Refined Multimodal Package Conclusions ................................................................. 2-22 3.0 Refined Bicycle and Pedestrian Recommendations ......................................................... 3-1 3.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian Project Refinement ................................................................ 3-2 3.2 Regionally Significant Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects ............................................ 3-4 3.3 Additional Considerations for Bicycle
  • Nomination Form, N.D

    Nomination Form, N.D

    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024--0018 (Rev. Au g. 2002) United States Department of the ln.terior Vt-fL 1z/10(0o National Park Service fJ tttf .~w NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any Item does not apply to the property being documented. enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance. enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative Items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor. or computer. to complete all items. ==================================================================================-===-======= 1. Name of Property =======================·-=================================--==============-===-===-==-======== historic name Arl ington Ridge Park (000-9707) '> other names/site number U.S. Marine Corps War Memorial (000-9707-0001/000-1233): Netherl3nds Carillon (000-9707- 0002/000-1239): Nevius Tract: lwo Jima Memorial -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------·----------------------------------------·-------------·--- ··---·--·---------------·-·-----------------------·--·-------------
  • Rosslyn Briefing Book

    Rosslyn Briefing Book

    Rosslyn Briefing Book DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING CONDITIONS IN THE ROSSLYN METRO STATION AREA A Resource for the Rosslyn Sector Plan Update MAY 2012 ARLINGTON COUNTY; DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING, HOUSING AND DEVELOPMENT; PLANNING DIVISION ROSSLYN BRIEFING BOOK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................................4 History of the Study Area............................................................................ ........................................................................5 Current Conditions and Description of the Study Area...................................................................................................9 Physical Conditions..............................................................................................................................................................9 Transportation and Access.................................................................................................................................................16 Parks and Open Space ......................................................................................................................................................21 Land Use and Development...............................................................................................................................................23 Demographics......................................................................................................................................................................31
  • District Boundary Increase 1

    District Boundary Increase 1

    NPS Fonn 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. Aug. 2002) (Expires Jan. 2005) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM This fonn is for use in nominating or requesting detenninations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register ofHistoric Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Fonn I0-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Property historic name Buckingham Historic District (Boundary Increase) other names/site number DHR File No. 000-0025 2. Location street & number Area bounded by and including N. Oxford Street, Fifth Street North, North Henderson Road, First Street North, and Second Street North state Virginia code VA county Arlington code 013 zip code 22203 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under theN ational Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certifY that this _x_ nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _meets_ does not meet the National Register Criteria.
  • Arlington County, Virginia

    Arlington County, Virginia

    ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA County Board Agenda Item Meeting of June 15, 2013 DATE: June 4, 2013 SUBJECT: Request to authorize Advertisement of a Public Hearing to consider an Amendment to Chapter 14.2 (Motor Vehicles and Traffic), Section 14.2-12(A), of the Code of Arlington County, Virginia, Concerning Maximum and Minimum Speed Limits along Portions of North Meade Street, Clarendon Boulevard, Wilson Boulevard, North Sycamore Street, I-395 (Henry G. Shirley Memorial Highway), and I-66 (Custis Memorial Parkway). C. M. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Advertisement of a July 13, 2012, public hearing to enact an Ordinance to Amend, Reenact and Recodify Chapter 14.2 (Motor Vehicles and Traffic), Section 14.2- 12(A), of the Code of Arlington County, Virginia, Concerning Maximum and Minimum Speed Limits by Decreasing the Speed Limit along Portions of North Meade Street, Clarendon Boulevard, Wilson Boulevard, and North Sycamore Street, and by Correcting the Speed Limit along Portions of I-66 (Custis Memorial Parkway) and I-395 (Henry G. Shirley Memorial Highway). ISSUES: As part of the regular process, the County Board is being requested to authorize the advertisement of a public hearing concerning a proposed amendment to the County Code. There are no outstanding issues. SUMMARY: The State Code authorizes local governing bodies to enact and enforce ordinances to increase or decrease the speed limits within its boundaries, provided such increase or decrease is based upon a traffic engineering investigation. The Department of Environmental Services, Division of Transportation has conducted studies on the following streets: 1. North Meade Street from Arlington Boulevard to Marshall Drive (formerly Jackson Avenue) 2.
  • Site-Specific Plan Amendment Process, to the Fairfax County Planning Commission for a Possible Amendment of Its Land Use Plan Designation

    Site-Specific Plan Amendment Process, to the Fairfax County Planning Commission for a Possible Amendment of Its Land Use Plan Designation

    \ I ULl V «mmm FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA J L ^r/o, 7 2017 NORTH COUNTY SITE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PROCESS :: \/ NOMINATION TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE PI.AN i : y . / / 4 ... w ' fCtl-r. TYPE OR PRINT RESPONSES IN BLACK INK Incomplete forms will not be accepted for review and will be returned to the nominator. Staff reserves the right to correct errors in street address, tax map number, acreage or current Plan designation and may contact the nominator for clarification before acceptance. Be sure to attach required map and original certified mail receipts as proof of property owner notification. THIS BOX FOR STAFF USE ONLY Date Received: Date Accepted: Planning District: Special Area: 1. NOMINATOR/AGENT INFORMATION Name; Elizabeth D. Baker, agent Daytime Phone: 703-528-4700 Address: c/o Walsh, Colucci, Lubeley & Walsh, P.C., 2200 Clarendon Boulevard, Suite 1300 Arlington, VA 22201 Nominator E-mail Address: [email protected] Signature of Nominator (NOTE: Ttere can be only one nominator per nomination): Signature of dwner(s) if applicable: (NOTE: Attach an additional sheet if necessary. Each owner of a nominated parcel must either sign the nomination or be sent a certified letter): See attached certified letters. Anyone signing on behalf of a business entity, must state the relationship to that organization below or on an attached page: 2. GENERAL INFORMATION Check appropriate | | Dranesville • Hunter Mill \J\ Providence | | Sully supervisor district: Total number of parcels nominated: 6-CIO Total aggregate size of all nominated parcels (in acres and square feet): 86 5 acres sq. 1 Is the nomination a Neighborhood Consolidation Proposal: |L JYes y£jNo (See page 22 of the Guide to the SSPA for more information.
  • Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Streets Element

    Master Transportation Plan (MTP) Streets Element

    ARLINGTON MASTER TRANSPORTATION PLAN STREETS ELEMENT Adopted February 12, 2011 Table of Contents I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………2 II. Summary………………………………………………………….……….……3 III. Policies, Implementation Actions and Performance Measures……….....4 o A Well‐Connected Network of Streets Compatible with Adjacent Land Uses o Complete Streets that Accommodate All Users and Encourage Alternatives to Driving o Manage Streets to reduce Injuries Sustained in Traffic Crashes o Manage Streets to Maximize Their Efficient Use and Minimize Long‐Term Public Expense o Enhance the Human and Natural Environments IV. Functional Classifications and Controlled‐Access Highways …...……..19 o Street Classifications o Controlled Access Highways V. A New Typology for Arlington Streets…………………………………….23 o Arterial Streets o Local (Non‐Arterial) Streets o Alleys and Private Streets o Street Improvement Projects Tables and Figures o Figure 1: Arterial Street Network Functional Classifications…………………………….20 o Table 1: Arlington Street Typology with Associated Street Characteristics…………....26 o Table 2: Local Streets Design Criteria ……………………………………………...………..31 Appendix A: Traffic Crashes Statistical Summary ………..……………..…………….………..….33 Appendix B: Green Streets information ……………………………………………..…………..…..36 Arlington Master Transportation Plan 1 Streets Element – Adopted February 12, 2011 I. Introduction This element of the MTP focuses on multi‐modal use of public streets and rights‐of‐way. Streets have traditionally been seen as the domain of the automobile but are essential facilities for nearly all forms of transportation including individual and mass transit, taxicabs, bicyclists and pedestrians. Moreover, our local streets are not just transportation facilities they also serve as and shape many of our community’s most public spaces. The MTP establishes six broad goals for Arlington’s transportation policy that direct the policies and implementation actions for street development and management that are identified in this document.
  • Bicycle Friendly Arlington Arlington County Bike

    Bicycle Friendly Arlington Arlington County Bike

    Randolph St. Rodman St. Rodman St. Park Rd. Quincy D c St. Quebec St. Quincy St. y. St. Chain Bridge a be w l ue k e Q P 38th St. h c Qu nc Spring Rd. Abbreviations used on this map: a Porter St. eb ra GEORGIA AVE/ r e B Perry Pl. c St. Sherier Pl. l y To Montgomery i Little Falls Rd. e a in Holmead Pl. Porter St. P Ogden St. PETWORTH HS = High School CC = Community Center P DalecarliaPkwy. Quebec Pl. 36th St. County l Ordway St. Oak St. Clara . American Potomac Ave. (YELLOW/GREEN) Arlington County Bike Map 29th St. MS = Middle School Cont. = Continuation Princeton Pl. Clara Barton Pkwy. University Norton 18th St. Loughboro Rd. I n . Otis Pl. Otis Pl. ES = Elementary School C Norton St. d Pl. r Meridian Pl. D i CLEVELAND PARK 14th St. & Watson St. an Newark St. Barton h O Ln. c Newton Pl. Dr. (RED) a C Em k e Chain Bridge Rd. 45th St. bassy P CLEVELAND PARK B a W Idaho Ave. Macomb St. Monroe St. Newton St. n N 13th St. 123 a Newark St. (Shared-use paved trails) METRO STATION 19th St. Park Rd. O-streete trails 34th St. Potomac l v Massachusetts Ave.Capital Bikeshare locations Klingle Rd. Note about street names on this map A Metrorail Stations Public Schools C T ska (Capital Bikeshare station Lowelllocations St. may change. Park Rd. Morton St. Pkwy. Capital ManningPl. hain o ra (BLUE/ORANGE) = Metrorail line color(s) w Bikeeb Lanes New Mexico Ave.
  • Northern Virginia Prime Product Rosslyn • Tysons • Reston

    Northern Virginia Prime Product Rosslyn • Tysons • Reston

    NORTHERN VIRGINIA PRIME PRODUCT ROSSLYN • TYSONS • RESTON WINTER • 2015 For more information contact: Revathi Greenwood Director, Research and Analysis +1 202 585 5662 [email protected] Connor Wilson Research Coordinator +1 703 288 2577 [email protected] John Groce Research Coordinator +1 202 585 5615 [email protected] CBRE 750 9th Street, NW 1861 International Drive Suite 900 Suite 300 Washington, DC 20001 McLean, VA 22102 © Copyright 2015 CBRE Information contained herein, including projections, has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. While we do not doubt its accuracy, we have not verified it and make no guarantee, warranty or representation about it. It is your responsibility to confirm independently its accuracy and completeness. This information is presented exclusively for use by CBRE clients and professionals and all rights to the material are reserved and cannot be reproduced without prior written permission of the CBRE Global Chief Economist. 2 | CBRE RESEARCH OVERVIEW The “flight to quality” narrative is well established in Northern Virginia with prime, well-located assets outperforming the rest of the market on key leasing metrics. However, the definition of quality varies by submarket. This report by CBRE Research explores the key markers that define quality from a leasing perspective in the submarkets of Rosslyn, Tysons, and Reston. Rosslyn’s views of Washington, D.C., Tyson’s new metro accessibility, and Reston’s 24/7 environment in the town center, drive leasing in a prime subset of buildings. ROSSLYN TYSONS RESTON Office Inventory 9.5 26.2 18.3 (MSF) Metro Lines 3 1 1 - McLean - Wiehle-Reston East - Tysons Corner Metro Stations - Rosslyn - Reston Town Center - Greensboro (planned for 2020) - Spring Hill Residents with a college degree 83% 72% 68% or higher Walk score 88 49 36 (/100) Population between 42% 16% 13% 25 and 34 - Metrorail and mall walkability - Prime views of Washington, D.C.