Freshwater Microorganisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Freshwater Microorganisms Freshwater Microorganisms • Amoebas are composed of just one cell. They are protozoans with no fixed shape. • Amoebas move by making part of its body move in the direction it wants to travel (a pseudopod). Then slowly the rest of the cell follows. In order to eat, an Amoeba flows around other microorganisms and then engulfs them. To reproduce the Amoeba splits itself into two cells. • Certain kinds of Amoeba can cause Amoebic Dysentery. Paramecium • This slipper-shaped protozoan is found in lakes, ponds, and puddles. Its constantly moving by beating rows of microscopic hairs, called cilia, that work like miniture oars. Paramecium feeds on bacteria and other microoriganisms by sweeping them into its groove shaped mouth. • It has contractile vacuoles to pump water out to maintain homeostasis. Blepharisma • The Blepharisma is a common ciliate found in most any pond. If it lives in bright sunlit ponds it is usually colorless. When exposed to an intense artificial light, the pink pigment emits a poisonous toxin that completely disintegrates the creature. Euglena • Euglena A genus of unicellular, green, photosynthetic protists, sometimes regarded as algae (division Euglenophyta), sometimes as protozoa (class Phytomastigophora). The cell body is typically spindle- shaped but is capable of broadening and narrowing to some extent; it is motile with a single flagellum. Euglena is common in all fresh-water habitats, especially when these are slightly polluted with organic matter. • Euglena has chloroplasts, so it gets its energy by eating and photosynthesizing. Stentor • Stentor, sometimes called trumpet animalcules are a genus of filter-feeding, heterotrophic ciliate protists, representative of the heterotrichs. They are usually horn-shaped, and reaching lengths of 2 millimeters, they are among the biggest known unicellular organisms. • They are named after Stentor, the Greek announcer. Vorticella • The Vorticella is a protist (protozoan) and belongs to the Phyllum Ciliophora. It is a very interesting, stalked ciliate with an inverted bell shape. The stalk contains a contractile fibril called a myoneme. When stimulated, it shortens, causing the stalk to coil like a spring. • Vorticella usually anchor themselves to small particles of material however, it is not uncommon to see them free swimming. When they undergo fission, they split along the longitudinal axis in a process called budding. When they finally split apart, one keeps the myoneme and the other free swims away and grows its own. The main purpose for the cilia at the top is to sweep food down into the gullet. Didinium Didinium’s main prey, Paramecium Didinium • The Didinium belongs to the Phyllum Ciliophora. They are from 80-200 um long. • Didinium are fast moving carnivorous protozoans that feed almost exclusively on live Paramecium. • When its "nose" (shown at top) strikes a Paramecium it latches on with a threadlike trichocyst. Once captured and paralyzed, the didinium devours the Paramecium whole. • The "C"-shaped structure inside the body is a band shaped nucleus and can sometimes be seen with a regular light microscope. • Didinium will encyst when the food source is depleted and excyst when the food returns. Volvox • Volvox is a Chlorophyte, or green alga. It exists as a grand spherical colony. Each little alga within the colony bears two flagella, whip-like hairs. The individual alga are connected to each other by thin strands of cytoplasm that enable the whole colony to swim in a coordinated fashion. The individual alga also have small red eye spots. • The colonies even have what we could call a front and rear end. Or, since Volvox resembles a little planet, a 'north and south pole'. In the northern region the eyespots are more developed. This helps the colony to swim towards the light. This differentiation of cells make Volvox quite unique. It is a colony that comes really close to being a multi-celled organism. • At the end of its life, Volvox bursts open and the small spheres inside it develop into new Volvox. Trypanosoma brucei • Trypanosoma brucei is a parasitic protist species that causes African trypanosomiasis (or sleeping sickness) in humans and nagana in animals in Africa. There are 3 sub-species of T. brucei: T. b. brucei, T. b. gambiense and T. b. rhodesiense. • These obligate parasites have two hosts – the tsetse fly and mammalian host (possibly human). Because of the large difference between these hosts, the trypanosome undergoes complex changes during its life cycle to facilitate its survival in the insect gut and the mammalian bloodstream. Toxoplasma gondii • Toxoplasma gondii is a species of parasitic protozoa in the genus Toxoplasma. The definitive host of T. gondii is the cat, but the parasite can be carried by many warm-blooded animals (birds or mammals). Toxoplasmosis, the disease caused by T. gondii, is usually minor. However, it can have serious or even fatal effects on a fetus whose mother first contracts the disease during pregnancy or on an immunocompromised human or cat. Plasmodium • Plasmodium is a genus of parasitic protists. Infection by these organisms causes malaria. • Of the over 200 known species of Plasmodium, at least 10 species infect humans. Other species infect animals, including monkeys, rodents, birds, and reptiles. The parasite always has two hosts in its life cycle: a mosquito vector and a vertebrate host. Daphnia • Daphnia are tiny crustaceans, never growing larger than a couple of millimeters no matter how well they eat. They are sometimes called water fleas because they are about that size and superficially look like fleas. • But unlike fleas they are nearly transparent, live in water, have a shell, and are graced with an interesting array of modified appendages for sensing, feeding, and swimming. Daphnia are free swimmers, propelling themselves with surprising speed, considering they use a pair of modified antennae to swim. As they travel they filter even tinier organisms from the water. They feed on single-celled algae, yeast, and bacteria. Daphnia in turn are eaten by fish and aquatic insects. It seems that their role in life is to provide a snack for a larger organism. • Eggs are carried in the brood pouch on the back. The heart, found just above the brood patch, can be seen beating in live specimens. .
Recommended publications
  • Life: the Science of Biology
    Lecture Notebook to accompany SINAUER ASSOCIATES, INC. MACMILLAN Copyright © 2014 Sinauer Associates, Inc. Cover photograph © Alex Mustard/naturepl.com. This document may not be modified or distributed (either electronically or on paper) without the permission of the publisher, with the following exception: Individual users may enter their own notes into this document and may print it for their own personal use. The Origin and Diversification of 0027 Eukaryotes 27.1 A Hypothetical Sequence for the Evolution of the Eukaryotic Cell (Page 550) 1 The protective Cell wall cell wall was lost. DNA 2 Infolding of the plasma membrane added surface area without increasing the cell’s volume. 3 Cytoskeleton (microfilament and microtubules) formed. 4 Internal membranes studded with ribosomes formed. 5 As regions of the infolded plasma membrane enclosed the cell’s DNA, a precursor of a nucleus formed. 6 Microtubules from the cytoskeleton formed the eukaryotic flagellum, 7 Early digestive vacuoles enabling propulsion. evolved into lysosomes using enzymes from the early endoplasmic reticulum. 8 Mitochondria formed through endosymbiosis with a proteobacterium. 9 Endosymbiosis with cyanobacteria led to the development of chloroplasts. Flagellum To add your own notes to any page, use Adobe Reader’s Chloroplast Typewriter feature, accessible via the Typewriter bar at Mitochondrion the top of the window. (Requires Adobe Reader 8 or later. Adobe Reader can be downloaded free of charge from the Nucleus Adobe website: http://get.adobe.com/reader.) LIFE2 The Science of Biology 10E Sadava © 2014 Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sinauer Associates Morales Studio Figure 27.01 05-24-12 Chapter 27 | The Origin and Diversification of Eukaryotes 3 (A) Primary endosymbiosis Eukaryote Cyanobacterium Cyanobacterium outer membrane Peptidoglycan Cyanobacterium inner membrane Host cell nucleus Chloroplast Peptidoglycan has been lost except in glaucophytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Interactions Between Phytoplankton and Microzooplankton: Their Influence on the Coupling Between Growth and Grazing Rates in the Sea
    Hydrobiologia 480: 41–54, 2002. 41 C.E. Lee, S. Strom & J. Yen (eds), Progress in Zooplankton Biology: Ecology, Systematics, and Behavior. © 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Novel interactions between phytoplankton and microzooplankton: their influence on the coupling between growth and grazing rates in the sea Suzanne Strom Shannon Point Marine Center, Western Washington University, 1900 Shannon Point Rd., Anacortes, WA 98221, U.S.A. Tel: 360-293-2188. E-mail: [email protected] Key words: phytoplankton, microzooplankton, grazing, stability, behavior, evolution Abstract Understanding the processes that regulate phytoplankton biomass and growth rate remains one of the central issues for biological oceanography. While the role of resources in phytoplankton regulation (‘bottom up’ control) has been explored extensively, the role of grazing (‘top down’ control) is less well understood. This paper seeks to apply the approach pioneered by Frost and others, i.e. exploring consequences of individual grazer behavior for whole ecosystems, to questions about microzooplankton–phytoplankton interactions. Given the diversity and paucity of phytoplankton prey in much of the sea, there should be strong pressure for microzooplankton, the primary grazers of most phytoplankton, to evolve strategies that maximize prey encounter and utilization while allowing for survival in times of scarcity. These strategies include higher grazing rates on faster-growing phytoplankton cells, the direct use of light for enhancement of protist digestion rates, nutritional plasticity, rapid population growth combined with formation of resting stages, and defenses against predatory zooplankton. Most of these phenomena should increase community-level coupling (i.e. the degree of instantaneous and time-dependent similarity) between rates of phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing, tending to stabilize planktonic ecosystems.
    [Show full text]
  • 28-Protistsf20r.Ppt [Compatibility Mode]
    9/3/20 Ch 28: The Protists (a.k.a. Protoctists) (meet these in more detail in your book and lab) 1 Protists invent: eukaryotic cells size complexity Remember: 1°(primary) endosymbiosis? -> mitochondrion -> chloroplast genome unicellular -> multicellular 2 1 9/3/20 For chloroplasts 2° (secondary) happened (more complicated) {3°(tertiary) happened too} 3 4 Eukaryotic “supergroups” (SG; between K and P) 4 2 9/3/20 Protists invent sex: meiosis and fertilization -> 3 Life Cycles/Histories (Fig 13.6) Spores and some protists (Humans do this one) 5 “Algae” Group PS Pigments Euglenoids chl a & b (& carotenoids) Dinoflagellates chl a & c (usually) (& carotenoids) Diatoms chl a & c (& carotenoids) Xanthophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Chrysophytes chl a & c (& carotenoids) Coccolithophorids chl a & c (& carotenoids) Browns chl a & c (& carotenoids) Reds chl a, phycobilins (& carotenoids) Greens chl a & b (& carotenoids) (more groups exist) 6 3 9/3/20 Name word roots (indicate nutrition) “algae” (-phyt-) protozoa (no consistent word ending) “fungal-like” (-myc-) Ecological terms plankton phytoplankton zooplankton 7 SG: Excavata/Excavates “excavated” feeding groove some have reduced mitochondria (e.g.: mitosomes, hydrogenosomes) 8 4 9/3/20 SG: Excavata O: Diplomonads: †Giardia Cl: Parabasalids: Trichonympha (bk only) †Trichomonas P: Euglenophyta/zoa C: Kinetoplastids = trypanosomes/hemoflagellates: †Trypanosoma C: Euglenids: Euglena 9 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates cell membrane 10 5 9/3/20 SG: “SAR” clade: Clade Alveolates P: Dinoflagellata/Pyrrophyta:
    [Show full text]
  • The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor Coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Biology) Department of Biology 2-20-2017 The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Mark M. Slabodnick University of California, San Francisco J. G. Ruby University of California, San Francisco Sarah B. Reiff University of California, San Francisco Estienne C. Swart University of Bern Sager J. Gosai University of Pennsylvania See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers Recommended Citation Slabodnick, M. M., Ruby, J. G., Reiff, S. B., Swart, E. C., Gosai, S. J., Prabakaran, S., Witkowska, E., Larue, G. E., Gregory, B. D., Nowacki, M., Derisi, J., Roy, S. W., Marshall, W. F., & Sood, P. (2017). The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell. Current Biology, 27 (4), 569-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.057 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers/49 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Abstract The giant, single-celled organism Stentor coeruleus has a long history as a model system for studying pattern formation and regeneration in single cells. Stentor [1, 2] is a heterotrichous ciliate distantly related to familiar ciliate models, such as Tetrahymena or Paramecium. The primary distinguishing feature of Stentor is its incredible size: a single cell is 1 mm long. Early developmental biologists, including T.H. Morgan [3], were attracted to the system because of its regenerative abilities—if large portions of a cell are surgically removed, the remnant reorganizes into a normal-looking but smaller cell with correct proportionality [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • There Is Not a Latin Root Word Clear Your Desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz
    There is not a Latin Root Word Clear your desk Protist Quiz Grade Quiz Malaria Fever Wars Classification Kingdom Protista contains THREE main groups of organisms: 1. Protozoa: “animal-like protists” 2. Algae: “plant-like protists” 3. Slime & Water Molds: “fungus-like protists” Basics of Protozoa Unicellular Eukaryotic unlike bacteria 65, 000 different species Heterotrophic Free-living (move in aquatic environments) or Parasitic Habitats include oceans, rivers, ponds, soil, and other organisms. Protozoa Reproduction ALL protozoa can use asexual reproduction through binary fission or multiple fission FEW protozoa reproduce sexually through conjugation. Adaptation Special Protozoa Adaptations Eyespot: detects changes in the quantity/ quality of light, and physical/chemical changes in their environment Cyst: hardened external covering that protects protozoa in extreme environments. Basics of Algae: “Plant-like” protists. MOST unicellular; SOME multicellular. Make food by photosynthesis (“autotrophic prostists”). Were classified as plants, BUT… – Lack tissue differentiation- NO roots, stems, leaves, etc. – Reproduce differently Most algal cells have pyrenoids (organelles that make and store starch) Can use asexual or sexual reproduction. Algae Structure: Thallus: body portion; usually haploid Body Structure: 1) unicellular: single-celled; aquatic (Ex.phytoplankton, Chlamydomonas) 2) colonial: groups of coordinated cells; “division of labor” (Ex. Volvox) 3) filamentous: rod-shaped thallus; some anchor to ocean bottom (Ex. Spyrogyra) 4) multicellular: large, complex, leaflike thallus (Ex. Macrocystis- giant kelp) Basics of Fungus-like Protists: Slime Molds: Water Molds: Once classified as fungi Fungus-like; composed of Found in damp soil, branching filaments rotting logs, and other Commonly freshwater; decaying matter. some in soil; some Some white, most yellow parasites.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaits in Paramecium Escape
    Transitions between three swimming gaits in Paramecium escape Amandine Hamela, Cathy Fischb, Laurent Combettesc,d, Pascale Dupuis-Williamsb,e, and Charles N. Barouda,1 aLadHyX and Department of Mechanics, Ecole Polytechnique, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 91128 Palaiseau cedex, France; bActions Thématiques Incitatives de Genopole® Centriole and Associated Pathologies, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité-Université d’Evry-Val-d’Essonne Unité U829, Université Evry-Val d'Essonne, Bâtiment Maupertuis, Rue du Père André Jarlan, 91025 Evry, France; cInstitut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale Unité UMRS-757, Bâtiment 443, 91405 Orsay, France; dSignalisation Calcique et Interactions Cellulaires dans le Foie, Université de Paris-Sud, Bâtiment 443, 91405 Orsay, France; and eEcole Supérieure de Physique et de Chimie Industrielles ParisTech, 10 rue Vauquelin, 75005 Paris, France Edited* by Harry L. Swinney, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, and approved March 8, 2011 (received for review November 10, 2010) Paramecium and other protists are able to swim at velocities reach- or in the switching between the different swimming behaviors ing several times their body size per second by beating their cilia (11, 13–17). in an organized fashion. The cilia beat in an asymmetric stroke, Below we show that Paramecium may also use an alternative to which breaks the time reversal symmetry of small scale flows. Here cilia to propel itself away from danger, which is based on tricho- we show that Paramecium uses three different swimming gaits to cyst extrusion. Trichocysts are exocytotic organelles, which are escape from an aggression, applied in the form of a focused laser regularly distributed along the plasma membrane in Paramecium heating.
    [Show full text]
  • Eukaryotes Microbes
    rator abo y M L ic ve ro IV Eukaryote Microbes 1–7 ti b c i a o r l o e t g y n I 1 Algae, 2 Lichens, 3 Fungi, I I I I I I I I I I I B 4 Fleshy Fungi, 5 Protozoa, s a e s c ic n , A ie 6 Slime Molds, 7 Water Molds p Sc pl h ied & Healt Eukaryotes 1 Algae top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ✟ 9 motility & structure videos ● Algal Thallus ✟ Carpenter’s diatom motility ● Algal Wet Mount (Biosafety Level 1)✲✱✓ ✟ Chlamydomonas motility ● Algal Wet Mount (Biosafety Level 2)✲✱✓ ✟ Diatom gliding movement ● Algal Wet Mount (disposable loop) ✲✱✱✓ ✟ Euglena motility ● Microscopic Algae✓ ✟ Gyrosigma motility ✟ ❍ Green Algae (Chlorophyta) ✟ Noctiluca scintillans motility ✟ ❍ Chlamydomonas ✟ Peridinium dinoflagellate motility ✟ ❍ Euglenoids (Euglenophyta) ✟ Synura cells & colony ❍ Diatoms (Chrysophyta) ✟ Volvox flagellate cells ✟✟ ❍ 1 frustules & motility ◆ ❍ 2 cell division ❖14 scenic microbiology, 60 images, 9 videos ❍ 3 sexual reproduction ❖ Biofouling 1, 2 ❍ 4 striae ❖ Coral Bleaching: Hawaii ✟◆ ◆ Volvox ❍ Dinoflagellates (Pyrrophyta) ❖ Coral Reefs: Pacific Ocean ❍ Red Tide 1–2 ❖ Coral Reefs 2: Andaman Sea, Indian Ocean◆ ❖ “Doing the Laundry”, India◆◆ ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 1A: Algae ❖ Green Lake, Lanzarote◆ ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 1B: Best Practice ❖ Garden Pond, British Columbia Canada, 1◆, 2 ● Eukaryotes Question Bank1.1✓–1.16◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆✟✟✟ ❖ Marine Luminescence, Sucia Island, WA, US◆ ❖ Red Tide, Vancouver & Comox, Canada ● 35 interactive pdf pages ❖ Sea Turtle Tracks, Galápagos Islands◆ ● 112 illustrations, 80 images of algae ❖ Sea Turtles & Sea
    [Show full text]
  • Wrc Research Report No. 131 Effects of Feedlot Runoff
    WRC RESEARCH REPORT NO. 131 EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA BY Kenneth S. Todd, Jr. College of Veterinary Medicine Department of Veterinary Pathology and Hygiene University of Illinois Urbana, Illinois 61801 FINAL REPORT PROJECT NO. A-074-ILL This project was partially supported by the U. S. ~epartmentof the Interior in accordance with the Water Resources Research Act of 1964, P .L. 88-379, Agreement No. 14-31-0001-7030. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS WATER RESOURCES CENTER 2535 Hydrosystems Laboratory Urbana, Illinois 61801 AUGUST 1977 ABSTRACT Water samples and free-living and sessite ciliated protozoa were col- lected at various distances above and below a stream that received runoff from a feedlot. No correlation was found between the species of protozoa recovered, water chemistry, location in the stream, or time of collection. Kenneth S. Todd, Jr'. EFFECTS OF FEEDLOT RUNOFF ON FREE-LIVING AQUATIC CILIATED PROTOZOA Final Report Project A-074-ILL, Office of Water Resources Research, Department of the Interior, August 1977, Washington, D.C., 13 p. KEYWORDS--*ciliated protozoa/feed lots runoff/*water pollution/water chemistry/Illinois/surface water INTRODUCTION The current trend for feeding livestock in the United States is toward large confinement types of operation. Most of these large commercial feedlots have some means of manure disposal and programs to prevent runoff from feed- lots from reaching streams. However, there are still large numbers of smaller feedlots, many of which do not have adequate facilities for disposal of manure or preventing runoff from reaching waterways. The production of wastes by domestic animals was often not considered in the past, but management of wastes is currently one of the largest problems facing the livestock industry.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evolutionary Switch in the Specificity of an Endosomal CORVET Tether Underlies
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/210328; this version posted October 27, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Title: An evolutionary switch in the specificity of an endosomal CORVET tether underlies formation of regulated secretory vesicles in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila Daniela Sparvolia, Elisabeth Richardsonb*, Hiroko Osakadac*, Xun Land,e*, Masaaki Iwamotoc, Grant R. Bowmana,f, Cassandra Kontura,g, William A. Bourlandh, Denis H. Lynni,j, Jonathan K. Pritchardd,e,k, Tokuko Haraguchic,l, Joel B. Dacksb, and Aaron P. Turkewitza th a Department of Molecular Genetics and Cell Biology, The University of Chicago, 920 E 58 Street, Chicago IL USA b Department of Cell Biology, University of Alberta, Canada c Advanced ICT Research Institute, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT), Kobe 651-2492, Japan. d Department of Genetics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 e Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305 f current affiliation: Department of Molecular Biology, University of Wyoming, Laramie g current affiliation: Department of Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510 h Department of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise ID 83725-1515 I Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON N1G 2W1, Canada j current affiliation: Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada k Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 l Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Suita 565-0871, Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Approach Sheds New Light Onto the Systematics
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN An integrative approach sheds new light onto the systematics and ecology of the widespread ciliate genus Coleps (Ciliophora, Prostomatea) Thomas Pröschold1*, Daniel Rieser1, Tatyana Darienko2, Laura Nachbaur1, Barbara Kammerlander1, Kuimei Qian1,3, Gianna Pitsch4, Estelle Patricia Bruni4,5, Zhishuai Qu6, Dominik Forster6, Cecilia Rad‑Menendez7, Thomas Posch4, Thorsten Stoeck6 & Bettina Sonntag1 Species of the genus Coleps are one of the most common planktonic ciliates in lake ecosystems. The study aimed to identify the phenotypic plasticity and genetic variability of diferent Coleps isolates from various water bodies and from culture collections. We used an integrative approach to study the strains by (i) cultivation in a suitable culture medium, (ii) screening of the morphological variability including the presence/absence of algal endosymbionts of living cells by light microscopy, (iii) sequencing of the SSU and ITS rDNA including secondary structures, (iv) assessment of their seasonal and spatial occurrence in two lakes over a one‑year cycle both from morphospecies counts and high‑ throughput sequencing (HTS), and, (v) proof of the co‑occurrence of Coleps and their endosymbiotic algae from HTS‑based network analyses in the two lakes. The Coleps strains showed a high phenotypic plasticity and low genetic variability. The algal endosymbiont in all studied strains was Micractinium conductrix and the mutualistic relationship turned out as facultative. Coleps is common in both lakes over the whole year in diferent depths and HTS has revealed that only one genotype respectively one species, C. viridis, was present in both lakes despite the diferent lifestyles (mixotrophic with green algal endosymbionts or heterotrophic without algae).
    [Show full text]