DOCSLIB.ORG

Eukaryotes Microbes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Eukaryotes Microbes rator abo y M L ic ve ro IV Eukaryote Microbes 1–7 ti b c i a o r l o e t g y n I 1 Algae, 2 Lichens, 3 Fungi, I I I I I I I I I I I B 4 Fleshy Fungi, 5 Protozoa, s a e s c ic n , A ie 6 Slime Molds, 7 Water Molds p Sc pl h ied & Healt Eukaryotes 1 Algae top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ✟ 9 motility & structure videos ● Algal Thallus ✟ Carpenter’s diatom motility ● Algal Wet Mount (Biosafety Level 1)✲✱✓ ✟ Chlamydomonas motility ● Algal Wet Mount (Biosafety Level 2)✲✱✓ ✟ Diatom gliding movement ● Algal Wet Mount (disposable loop) ✲✱✱✓ ✟ Euglena motility ● Microscopic Algae✓ ✟ Gyrosigma motility ✟ ❍ Green Algae (Chlorophyta) ✟ Noctiluca scintillans motility ✟ ❍ Chlamydomonas ✟ Peridinium dinoflagellate motility ✟ ❍ Euglenoids (Euglenophyta) ✟ Synura cells & colony ❍ Diatoms (Chrysophyta) ✟ Volvox flagellate cells ✟✟ ❍ 1 frustules & motility ◆ ❍ 2 cell division ❖14 scenic microbiology, 60 images, 9 videos ❍ 3 sexual reproduction ❖ Biofouling 1, 2 ❍ 4 striae ❖ Coral Bleaching: Hawaii ✟◆ ◆ Volvox ❍ Dinoflagellates (Pyrrophyta) ❖ Coral Reefs: Pacific Ocean ❍ Red Tide 1–2 ❖ Coral Reefs 2: Andaman Sea, Indian Ocean◆ ❖ “Doing the Laundry”, India◆◆ ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 1A: Algae ❖ Green Lake, Lanzarote◆ ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 1B: Best Practice ❖ Garden Pond, British Columbia Canada, 1◆, 2 ● Eukaryotes Question Bank1.1✓–1.16◆◆◆◆◆◆◆◆✟✟✟ ❖ Marine Luminescence, Sucia Island, WA, US◆ ❖ Red Tide, Vancouver & Comox, Canada ● 35 interactive pdf pages ❖ Sea Turtle Tracks, Galápagos Islands◆ ● 112 illustrations, 80 images of algae ❖ Sea Turtles & Sea Turtles Diet, Sri Lanka◆ ❖ Toxic Shellfish, Washington State, US ✲ 3 techniques animation ✱ 4 techniques video ✓ 5 best practice animations Eukaryotes 2 Lichens top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ❖ Christmas Tree Lichens, New Zealand ● Lichen Morphology ❖ Cobh City Wall Lichens, Ireland◆ ● Lichen Ecology 1◆–2◆◆ ❖ Dry Stone Fence Lichens, England◆ ● Lichen Structure ❖ Giant’s Causeway, Northern Island◆ ● Lichen Applications ❖ Gravestone Lichens ❖ Isle of Pines Lichen, South Pacific ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 2 ❖ Maunoa Loa Volcano Lichen, Hawaii◆ ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 2.1–2.13◆◆◆◆◆ ❖ Neglected Yacht Lichens, Blaine, WA ❖ St. Mary Virgin Church Lichen, Rye, UK ● 21 interactive pdf pages ❖ Sainte-Mère Église Lichen, Normandy ● 88 illustrations, 57 images of lichens ❖ Seawall Lichens, Argentina◆ Cladonia cristatella Cladonia ❖ Timanfaya Park Lichens, Lanzarote◆ ❖ 15 scenic microbiology, 84 images, 8 videos◆ ❖ Tropical Pine Lichens, Azores. ❖Antarctic & Arctic Glaciers◆◆ ❖ British Soldier Lichen Eukaryotes 3 Fungi top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ✲ 3 techniques animations ● Activities of Fungi 1✓–5 ✱ 6 techniques videos ● Yeast Streak Plate✲✱✓ ✓ 5 best practice animations ● Yeast Wet Mount✲✱✓ ● Staining Molds✲✱✱✱✓ ✟ 1 motility video ● Yeasts & Molds 1✟✟✱–3 ✟ Yeast Brownian Movement ● Fungi Divisions ❍ Zygomycetes 1–3 ✟ 1 cell division video ❍ Ascomycetes 1–4 ✟ Budding Yeasts ❍ Basidiomycetes 1–5 ◆ Penicillium ❍ Imperfect Fungi 1–2 ❖ 7 scenic microbiology, 31 images, 2 videos ❖ Australian Frogs & Chytridiomycosis ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 3A: Fungi 1 ❖ Cordyceps: Chinese caterpillar fungus ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 3B: Fungi 2 ❖ Ecuadorian Frogs & Captive Breeding ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 3C: Best Practice ❖ Last Supper, Sagrada Familia, Barcelona ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 3.1✓–3.10◆◆ ❖ McDonald’s Blue Cheese◆, Montevideo ❖ Straw Hats & Halloween Pumpkins ● 41 interactive pdf pages ❖ Unleavened Bread in the Venice Ghetto◆ ● 110 illustrations, 79 images of fungi Eukaryotes 4 Fleshy Fungi top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 4: Fleshy Fungi ● Fleshy Fungi ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 4.1–4.10 ● Basidiomycetes 1–2 ❍ Agarics 1–2 ❍ Bird’s Nest Fungi ● 39 interactive pdf pages ❍ Boletes ❍ Bracket Fungi ● 112 illustrations, 109 images of fleshy fungi ❍ Cauliflower Fungi ❍ Chanterelles ❍ Club & Coral Fungi ❖ 3 scenic microbiology, 28 images ❍ Earthstars ❍ Inky Caps ❖ Mushroom Graffiti, Buenos Aires, ❍ Jelly Fungi ❍ Polyspores 1–2 ` Argentina ❍ Puffballs ❍ Tooth Fungi ❖ National Museum of Modern Art, Paris Amanita muscaria ● Ascomycetes ❖ Tartufo Bianco Festival, Tuscany, Italy ❍ Cup Fungi ❍ Elfin Saddles/False Morels ❍ Morels ❍ Truffles Eukaryotes 5 Protozoa top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ✲ 2 techniques animations ● Kingdom Protozoa✓ ✱ 4 techniques videos ● Protozoa Wet Mount✲✱✱✓ ✓ 5 best practice animations ● Giemsa Staining Procedure✲✱✓ ● Flagellates (Mastigophora) ❉ Paramecium conjugation animation ❍ Peranema trichophorum✟✟ ❍ Termite Gut Flagellates 1✱✓–2✟✟✟✟✟✟✟ ✟ 14 motility videos ● Ameba (Sarcodina) ✟ Ameboid movement—brightfield ❍ Ameboid Movement✟ ✟ Paramecium motility—interference ❍ Arcella ✟ Peranema—darkfield ● Ciliates (Ciliophora) ✟ Peranema—interference ✟ ❍ Stentor ✟ Peranema Motility—interference ✟ ❍ Paramecium ✟ Stentor motility—brightfield 1 Cell Structures ✟ Streblomastrix strix—interference 2 Asexual Reproduction ✟ Termite Gut Flagellates—brightfield ❉ Trichonympha collaris collaris Trichonympha 3, 4 Conjugation ✟ Termite Gut Flagellates—phase-contrast ● Sporozoans ✟ Termite Gut Flagellates—inteference ✟ Trichomonas termopsidis—interference ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 5A: Protozoa ✟ Trichonympha collaris—brightfield ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 5B: Best Practice ✟ Trichonympha collaris—interference ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 5.1✓–5.6 ❖✟✟ ✟ Vorticella motility ● 27 interactive pdf pages ❖ 1 scenic microbiology, 6 images, 1 video◆ ● 71 illustrations, 58 images of protozoa ❖ Silkworms & Pébrine◆ Eukaryotes 6 Slime Molds top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ● 19 interactive pdf pages ● Cellular & Acellular Slime Molds ● 26 illustrations, 22 images of slime molds ● Culturing Dictyostelium 1✲✱✓–2✲✱✓ ✲✓ ❍ Dictyostelium Wet Mount ✲ 5 techniques animations ❍ Dictyostelium Life Cycle 1–2 ✱ 3 techniques videos ✲✱✓ ✲✓ ● Culturing Physarum 1 –2 ✓ 6 best practice animations ✟ plasmodium ❍ Physarum Plasmodium ❍ Physarum Fruiting Structures ✟ 1 motility video✟ ❍ Physarum Sclerotium ✟ Physarum cytoplasmic movement Physarum Physarum ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 6A: Slime Molds ❖ 1 scenic microbiology, 2 images ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 6B: Best Practice ❖ Slime mold habitat ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 6.1✓–6.4❖ Eukaryotes 7 Water Molds top of page ● Objectives/Key Words ● 22 interactive pdf pages ● “Egg Fungi” ● 55 illustrations, 36 images of water molds ● Culturing Water Molds (BSL1, BSL2)✲✱✓ ● Microscopy of Water Molds (BSL1, BSL2)✱✓ ✲ 2 techniques animation ● Oomycete Wet Mount (BSL2)✲✱✱✓ ✱ 4 techniques videos ● Oomycete Life Cycle 1✓, 2, 3✟, 4 ✓ 5 best practice animations ● Oomycete Characteristics ● Plant Pathogenic Oomycetes ✟ 1 motility video✟ ● Oomycete Infection of Salmon◆ ✟ Oomycete Motile Zoospores✟ water mold oogonium water ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 7A: Water Molds ❖ 4 scenic microbiology, 26 images, 3 videos◆ ● Eukaryotes Quick Quiz 7B: Best Practice ❖ Returning Pacific Salmon, Canada◆ ● Eukaryotes Question Bank 7.1✓–7.6◆◆ ❖ Famine Memorial, Dublin, Ireland◆ ❖ Islas Ballestas, Seabird Guano & The Irish Potato Famine◆ ❖ Phytophora dieback, Western Australia.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Enucleation on Flagellar Regeneration in the Protozoon Peranema Trichophorum
    J. CM Set. 4, 171-178 (1969) 171 Printed in Great Britain THE EFFECT OF ENUCLEATION ON FLAGELLAR REGENERATION IN THE PROTOZOON PERANEMA TRICHOPHORUM S. L. TAMM* Department of Zoology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A. SUMMARY A rotocompressor was used to enucleate the flagellate protozoon Peranema trichophorum at known stages in the mitotic cycle. This new enucleation technique, combined with recently devised methods for amputating the flagellum and recording its regeneration in single living cells, permitted the investigation of the role of the nucleus in flagellar regeneration at different cell ages. The flagellar regeneration capacity of an enucleate Peranema depended on the stage in the cell cycle when the nucleus was removed. Post-division enucleate cells regenerated about half the length reached by sham-operated controls, and at slower rates, while predivision enucleate cells regenerated flagella equally as well as the controls. Therefore, the nucleus is making an immediate contribution to flagellar regeneration early in the cell cycle, but not late in the cell cycle. INTRODUCTION Enucleation is a classic experimental method for investigating interactions between nucleus and cytoplasm during various cell functions. The effects of enucleation on many aspects of cell morphogenesis have been studied extensively by cutting uni- cellular organisms into nucleate and enucleate fragments. The general conclusion has emerged from these merotomy experiments that the nucleus (macronucleus in ciliate protozoans) is essential for regeneration and restoration of normal body form (see reviews by Balamuth, 1940; Brachet, 1961; Hammerling, 1953; Weisz, 1954). The purpose of the present work is to investigate the role of the nucleus in the regeneration of a specific cellular organelle, the flagellum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor Coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (Biology) Department of Biology 2-20-2017 The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Mark M. Slabodnick University of California, San Francisco J. G. Ruby University of California, San Francisco Sarah B. Reiff University of California, San Francisco Estienne C. Swart University of Bern Sager J. Gosai University of Pennsylvania See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers Recommended Citation Slabodnick, M. M., Ruby, J. G., Reiff, S. B., Swart, E. C., Gosai, S. J., Prabakaran, S., Witkowska, E., Larue, G. E., Gregory, B. D., Nowacki, M., Derisi, J., Roy, S. W., Marshall, W. F., & Sood, P. (2017). The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell. Current Biology, 27 (4), 569-575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.057 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/biology_papers/49 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Macronuclear Genome of Stentor coeruleus Reveals Tiny Introns in a Giant Cell Abstract The giant, single-celled organism Stentor coeruleus has a long history as a model system for studying pattern formation and regeneration in single cells. Stentor [1, 2] is a heterotrichous ciliate distantly related to familiar ciliate models, such as Tetrahymena or Paramecium. The primary distinguishing feature of Stentor is its incredible size: a single cell is 1 mm long. Early developmental biologists, including T.H. Morgan [3], were attracted to the system because of its regenerative abilities—if large portions of a cell are surgically removed, the remnant reorganizes into a normal-looking but smaller cell with correct proportionality [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia Pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia
    A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks (Under the direction of Mark A. Farmer) Abstract The genus Ploeotia represents a group of small, colorless, heterotrophic euglenids commonly found in shallow-water marine sediments. Species belonging to this genus have histori- cally been poorly described and studied. However, a Group I intron discovered within the small subunit ribosomal DNA gene of Ploeotia costata, makes P. costata the only euglena- zoan known to possess an actively splicing Group I intron. This intron contains conserved secondary structures that indicate monophyly with introns found in Stramenopiles and Ban- giales red algae. This project describes the internal and external morphology of a related species, Ploeotia pseudanisonema, using light and electron microscopy, and investigates the possibility of a Group I intron within P. pseudanisonema. Using recently obtained SSU rRNA sequences, we also examine the phylogeny of Ploeotia, and comment on the relationship of the genus Keelungia to Ploeotia. Index words: Ploeotia pseudanisonema, Ploeotia costata, Ploeotia vitrea, Keelungia pulex, Transmission electron microscopy, Scanning electron microscopy, Small subunit rRNA, Euglenozoan Phylogeny A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks B.S., University of Alabama, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of The University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Athens, Georgia 2010 c 2014 Andrew Buren Brooks All Right Reserved A Morphological Re-Description of Ploeotia pseudanisonema, and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Genus Ploeotia by Andrew Buren Brooks Approved: Major Professor: Mark A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Integrative Approach Sheds New Light Onto the Systematics
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN An integrative approach sheds new light onto the systematics and ecology of the widespread ciliate genus Coleps (Ciliophora, Prostomatea) Thomas Pröschold1*, Daniel Rieser1, Tatyana Darienko2, Laura Nachbaur1, Barbara Kammerlander1, Kuimei Qian1,3, Gianna Pitsch4, Estelle Patricia Bruni4,5, Zhishuai Qu6, Dominik Forster6, Cecilia Rad‑Menendez7, Thomas Posch4, Thorsten Stoeck6 & Bettina Sonntag1 Species of the genus Coleps are one of the most common planktonic ciliates in lake ecosystems. The study aimed to identify the phenotypic plasticity and genetic variability of diferent Coleps isolates from various water bodies and from culture collections. We used an integrative approach to study the strains by (i) cultivation in a suitable culture medium, (ii) screening of the morphological variability including the presence/absence of algal endosymbionts of living cells by light microscopy, (iii) sequencing of the SSU and ITS rDNA including secondary structures, (iv) assessment of their seasonal and spatial occurrence in two lakes over a one‑year cycle both from morphospecies counts and high‑ throughput sequencing (HTS), and, (v) proof of the co‑occurrence of Coleps and their endosymbiotic algae from HTS‑based network analyses in the two lakes. The Coleps strains showed a high phenotypic plasticity and low genetic variability. The algal endosymbiont in all studied strains was Micractinium conductrix and the mutualistic relationship turned out as facultative. Coleps is common in both lakes over the whole year in diferent depths and HTS has revealed that only one genotype respectively one species, C. viridis, was present in both lakes despite the diferent lifestyles (mixotrophic with green algal endosymbionts or heterotrophic without algae).
    [Show full text]
  • Multigene Eukaryote Phylogeny Reveals the Likely Protozoan Ancestors of Opis- Thokonts (Animals, Fungi, Choanozoans) and Amoebozoa
    Accepted Manuscript Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opis- thokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith, Ema E. Chao, Elizabeth A. Snell, Cédric Berney, Anna Maria Fiore-Donno, Rhodri Lewis PII: S1055-7903(14)00279-6 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012 Reference: YMPEV 4996 To appear in: Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution Received Date: 24 January 2014 Revised Date: 2 August 2014 Accepted Date: 11 August 2014 Please cite this article as: Cavalier-Smith, T., Chao, E.E., Snell, E.A., Berney, C., Fiore-Donno, A.M., Lewis, R., Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (2014), doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.ympev.2014.08.012 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 1 Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts 2 (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa 3 4 Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E. Chao1, Elizabeth A. Snell1, Cédric Berney1,2, Anna Maria 5 Fiore-Donno1,3, and Rhodri Lewis1 6 7 1Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2105.11503V2 [Physics.Bio-Ph] 26 May 2021 3.1 Geometry and Swimming Speeds of the Cells
    The Bank Of Swimming Organisms at the Micron Scale (BOSO-Micro) Marcos F. Velho Rodrigues1, Maciej Lisicki2, Eric Lauga1,* 1 Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom. 2 Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland. *Email: [email protected] Abstract Unicellular microscopic organisms living in aqueous environments outnumber all other creatures on Earth. A large proportion of them are able to self-propel in fluids with a vast diversity of swimming gaits and motility patterns. In this paper we present a biophysical survey of the available experimental data produced to date on the characteristics of motile behaviour in unicellular microswimmers. We assemble from the available literature empirical data on the motility of four broad categories of organisms: bacteria (and archaea), flagellated eukaryotes, spermatozoa and ciliates. Whenever possible, we gather the following biological, morphological, kinematic and dynamical parameters: species, geometry and size of the organisms, swimming speeds, actuation frequencies, actuation amplitudes, number of flagella and properties of the surrounding fluid. We then organise the data using the established fluid mechanics principles for propulsion at low Reynolds number. Specifically, we use theoretical biophysical models for the locomotion of cells within the same taxonomic groups of organisms as a means of rationalising the raw material we have assembled, while demonstrating the variability for organisms of different species within the same group. The material gathered in our work is an attempt to summarise the available experimental data in the field, providing a convenient and practical reference point for future studies. Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Methods 4 2.1 Propulsion at low Reynolds number .
    [Show full text]
  • Protist Phylogeny and the High-Level Classification of Protozoa
    Europ. J. Protistol. 39, 338–348 (2003) © Urban & Fischer Verlag http://www.urbanfischer.de/journals/ejp Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa Thomas Cavalier-Smith Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK; E-mail: [email protected] Received 1 September 2003; 29 September 2003. Accepted: 29 September 2003 Protist large-scale phylogeny is briefly reviewed and a revised higher classification of the kingdom Pro- tozoa into 11 phyla presented. Complementary gene fusions reveal a fundamental bifurcation among eu- karyotes between two major clades: the ancestrally uniciliate (often unicentriolar) unikonts and the an- cestrally biciliate bikonts, which undergo ciliary transformation by converting a younger anterior cilium into a dissimilar older posterior cilium. Unikonts comprise the ancestrally unikont protozoan phylum Amoebozoa and the opisthokonts (kingdom Animalia, phylum Choanozoa, their sisters or ancestors; and kingdom Fungi). They share a derived triple-gene fusion, absent from bikonts. Bikonts contrastingly share a derived gene fusion between dihydrofolate reductase and thymidylate synthase and include plants and all other protists, comprising the protozoan infrakingdoms Rhizaria [phyla Cercozoa and Re- taria (Radiozoa, Foraminifera)] and Excavata (phyla Loukozoa, Metamonada, Euglenozoa, Percolozoa), plus the kingdom Plantae [Viridaeplantae, Rhodophyta (sisters); Glaucophyta], the chromalveolate clade, and the protozoan phylum Apusozoa (Thecomonadea, Diphylleida). Chromalveolates comprise kingdom Chromista (Cryptista, Heterokonta, Haptophyta) and the protozoan infrakingdom Alveolata [phyla Cilio- phora and Miozoa (= Protalveolata, Dinozoa, Apicomplexa)], which diverged from a common ancestor that enslaved a red alga and evolved novel plastid protein-targeting machinery via the host rough ER and the enslaved algal plasma membrane (periplastid membrane).
    [Show full text]
  • Pusillus Poseidon's Guide to Protozoa
    Pusillus Poseidon’s guide to PROTOZOA GENERAL NOTES ABOUT PROTOZOANS Protozoa are also called protists. The word “protist” is the more general term and includes all types of single-celled eukaryotes, whereas “protozoa” is more often used to describe the protists that are animal-like (as opposed to plant-like or fungi-like). Protists are measured using units called microns. There are 1000 microns in one millimeter. A millimeter is the smallest unit on a metric ruler and can be estimated with your fingers: The traditional way of classifying protists is by the way they look (morphology), by the way they move (mo- tility), and how and what they eat. This gives us terms such as ciliates, flagellates, ameboids, and all those colors of algae. Recently, the classification system has been overhauled and has become immensely complicated. (Infor- mation about DNA is now the primary consideration for classification, rather than how a creature looks or acts.) If you research these creatures on Wikipedia, you will see this new system being used. Bear in mind, however, that the categories are constantly shifting as we learn more and more about protist DNA. Here is a visual overview that might help you understand the wide range of similarities and differences. Some organisms fit into more than one category and some don’t fit well into any category. Always remember that classification is an artificial construct made by humans. The organisms don’t know anything about it and they don’t care what we think! CILIATES Eats anything smaller than Blepharisma looks slightly pink because it Blepharisma itself, even smaller Bleph- makes a red pigment that senses light (simi- arismas.
    [Show full text]
  • Parts and During Physiological Reorganization, When New Oral Structures Replace the Pre-Existing Ones for Reasons That Are Not Well Understood
    MACRONUCLEAR DNA SYNTHESIS IN STENTOR: REGULATION BY A CYTOPLASMIC INITIATOR* BY NOEL DE TERRA LABORATORY OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND RADIATION BIOLOGY, DEPARTMENT OF BIOPHYSICS AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, SCHOOL OF MEDICINE, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA (LOS ANGELES) Communicated by Daniel Mazia, December 30, 1966 The large ciliate Stentor coeruleus lends itself well to microsurgical procedures. By combining these techniques with autoradiography after exposure of cells to thymidine-H3, it is possible to study mechanisms regulating the occurrence of macro- nuclear DNA synthesis during the cell growth cycle. Transfer of nuclei between cells which are synthesizing DNA and cells which are not can indicate whether DNA synthesis is determined by the continuous presence or absence of a cytoplasmic factor. Similar experiments involving cell grafting could characterize such a factor as an initiator or an inhibitor. This paper describes these experiments and their results. Previous work on Stentor has suggested that mechanisms regulating the occurrence of several major events in the cell growth cycle are located in the cytoplasm.3-5 The present results will be discussed in terms of these earlier findings and also in relation to current knowledge about regulation of nuclear DNA synthesis. Stentor coeruleus is a large heterotrich ciliate; individual organisms often reach a length of 1 mm when fully extended. Figure 1A shows the main morphological features of S. coeruleus, including the chain macronucleus, the anteriorly placed oral apparatus, and the rows of blue-green pigment granules running longitudinally between the kineties. Throughout interphase, the macronucleus exists as a chain of nodes spiralling almost the entire length of the organism and situated directly beneath the ecto- plasm.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Mechanism of Dinoflagellate Flagella Contraction-Relaxation Cycle
    Biol Cell (1992) 76, 33-42 33 © Elsevier, Paris Original article Analysis of the mechanism of dinoflagellate flagella contraction-relaxation cycle Monique Cachon a, Claude Greuet b, Jacky Cosson a, Philippe Huitorel" a Groupe de Motilitd Cellulaire, URA 671 du CNRS, Universit~ Pet M Curie, Observatoire Ocdanologique, 06230 Villefranche-sur-Mer; b Centre de Biologie Marine, Laboratoire de Cytophysiologie des Protistes, Universitd de Nice-Sophia Antipolis, 06108 Nice Cedex, France (Received 11 May 1992; accepted 29 September 1992) Summary - Dinoflagellates possess two flagella. One of them, the longitudinal flagellum, retracts from time to time in some species, such as Ceratium and Peridinium. Additional structures which run along the axoneme seem to be responsible for this particular beha- viour. The retraction which is rapid (less than 60 ms) may be subdivided into several steps: i) the undulating movement stops; ii) the flagellum appears then as a jagged line during 20 ms; iii) finally a rapid retraction (20 ms) takes place, the flagellum being folded 20 times inside the cylindrical flagellar pocket. The measurements on video-records suggest that the R-fibre shortens to 30°7o of its original length. The contraction and relaxation mechanism of nanofilaments is proposed to be through coiling and uncoiling depen- dent on Ca 2+ concentration. protist / flagellar contraction / nanofilaments Introduction Motility observations Dinoflagellates possess two flagella, one longitudinal and These were made using Leitz and Reichert microscopes equipped one transverse, whose properties are not yet fully under- with differential interference contrast (DIC) Nomarski optics. stood [1-10]. These flagella appear to beat according to Video recordings were made with a Panasomic CCD camera sinusoidal waves [11] but in fact the transverse has a heli- (F.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensive Molecular Tinkering in the Evolution of the Membrane Attachment Mode of the Rheb Gtpase
    Extensive molecular tinkering in the evolution of the membrane attachment mode of the Rheb GTPase Kristína Záhonová1, Romana Petrželková1, Matus Valach2, Euki Yazaki3, Denis V. Tikhonenkov4, Anzhelika Butenko1, Jan Janouškovec5, Štěpánka Hrdá6, Vladimír Klimeš1, Gertraud Burger2, Yuji Inagaki7, Patrick J. Keeling8, Vladimír Hampl6, Pavel Flegontov1, Vyacheslav Yurchenko1, Marek Eliáš1* 1Department of Biology and Ecology & Institute of Environmental Technologies, Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic 2Department of Biochemistry and Robert-Cedergren Centre for Bioinformatics and Genomics, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada 3Institute for Biological Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan 4Laboratory of Microbiology, Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters, Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Russia 5Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, United Kingdom 6Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic 7Center for Computational Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan 8Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada *Author for correspondence: Marek Eliáš, Department of Biology and Ecology, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, 710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic, tel.: +420-597092329, e-mail: [email protected] Supplementary Figures S1 to S7 Fig. S1. Phylogenetic analysis confirming identification of Rheb orthologs. The maximum likelihood tree was inferred using RAxML-HPC2 (LG4X+ substitution model) based on a multiple alignment of the conserved GTPase domain (151 aligned amino acid position). The root is arbitrarily placed between the clade comprising bona fide Rhebs and other Ras family proteins. The numbers at branches refer to ML bootstrap values (shown only when ≥65%) and posterior probabilities (≥0.9) calculated using MrBayes (WAG++I substation model).
    [Show full text]