DOCSLIB.ORG

3-3 Potential Open Space Linkages.Indd

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Potential Open Space Linkages Chapter 3 · Community Background Potential Open Space Linkages Vegetation along the Schuylkill River Bank What are Open Space Linkages? Open space linkages are linear, undeveloped cor- regional location, the Township needs to ensure that ridors that contain natural features, trails, or open its residents can access these regional resources easily spaces that connect existing or proposed open space through local trail networks that link to their neigh- areas. They can form a link between multiple resi- borhoods. dential neighborhoods, and they can connect neigh- The Township contains multiple creek and stream borhoods to other districts and the greater region. corridors, a significant utility right-of-way, and an Typically, open space linkages follow creeks, streams extensive network of public open spaces. These cor- or river banks, utility rights-of-way, abandoned or ridors represent opportunities to create local feeder inactive rail lines, and in some cases, abandoned trails to Township parks and open spaces as well as roadways. These linkages can be multi-modal, serv- the regional trail network. ing many different users including pedestrians, bicy- The primary documents guiding the current trail clists and equestrians, or they can serve only one user development within Whitemarsh Township are Mont- group, typically depending on the type of trail and gomery County’s Bicycle Mobility Plan, Whitemarsh the terrain. Township’s 2003 Comprehensive Plan and the Open There are many different features within Space Plan Update of 1996. The proposed trails sys- Whitemarsh Township that already serve as open tem, both on- and off-street, is shown on Map #14 space linkages or present excellent opportunities for Pathways and Trails. the expansion of existing linkages. The Township is The existing trails and potential linkages use the fortunate to be centrally located within the regional following natural and man-made features: trail network. Four major regional trails traverse the Township and create a well-developed basis for the Creek Corridors creation and development of a comprehensive Town- The following creek corridors represent potential ship-wide trail network. To take full advantage of its open space linkages, either as natural areas or poten- tial trail linkages, as determined by the Township. · Whitemarsh Township Open Space Plan · 37 Chapter 3 · Community Background Lorraine Run · Lorraine Run is the Township’s largest Country Club with the proposed sidewalk/pathway creek, west of the Wissahickon. Lorraine Run flows to be located along Germantown Pike. east from the west side of Sheaff Lane, between a gap in Cold Point and Militia Hill, along the north Sandy Run Creek · Sandy Run Creek flows southwest side of Stenton Avenue, through the Philadelphia from Upper Dublin Township for a short distance Cricket Club, before emptying into the Wissahickon before converging with Wissahickon Creek in Fort Creek, near West Valley Green Road. Most of the Hill. The majority of this creek is located within the Lorraine Run Corridor is located on Sunnybrook and Sandy Run and Fort Hill Areas of Fort Washington Philadelphia Cricket Club lands, with a small portion State Park. Enhanced connections between the Cross between the two flowing through large residential County Trail and the Sandy Run Area would allow lots. Along its course, Lorraine Run crosses the Cross Sandy Run Area users to easily access the Cross County Trail and the Wissahickon Trail, just before County Trail and SEPTA’s Fort Washington Station. emptying into the Wissahickon Creek. Utility Rights-of-Way Spring Mill Creek · The Spring Mill Creek begins PECO Transmission Line · This transmission line within the Green Valley Country Club and flows located in the southern portion of the Township en- south through Kline Park and Spring Mill Park before ters Whitemarsh from Plymouth Township, south of emptying in to the Schuylkill River. The proposed Silt Sherry Lake. The transmission line and the associated Basin Trail follows its course south from Germantown right-of-way travels south to Spring Mill Park before Pike, through Kline Park and several undeveloped turning to the east and paralleling the Schuylkill Riv- parcels, before terminating at the proposed sidewalk/ er before entering into Philadelphia. The right-of-way pathway to be constructed along the length of Cedar passes by a variety of land uses including single- and Grove Road. Completion of this proposed trail would multi-family residential developments, several office provide a connection from Miles Park to Spring Mill parks, undeveloped parcels, and Whitemarsh Town- Park. ship’s Cedar Grove Park and Montgomery County’s Spring Mill Park. The western portion of the right- Andorra Creek · Andorra Creek flows southwest from Harts Lane and enters the Schuylkill River near Spring Mill Park. Andorra Creek flows through a large parcel of privately owned open space, a significant area of residential development, past the former ski slope parcel, across the PECO right-of-way, before crossing the Schuylkill River Trail and entering the Schuylkill River. Acquisition of the linear space along Andorra Creek would allow the creation of a riparian corridor and possibly a trail connecting the areas west of ACE PECO right-of-way 38 · Whitemarsh Township Open Space Plan · Potential Open Space Linkages of-way presents the potential for a connection of sur- Norfolk Southern Freight Line · The abandoned Nor- rounding residential neighborhood with Cedar Grove folk Southern Freight railroad line enters Whitemarsh Park, Spring Mill Park and the Schuylkill River Trail. Township from Plymouth Township in close proxim- ity to Flourtown Road. From this point it travels east Transportation Rights-of-Way towards the intersection of Joshua Road and Sten- SEPTA R5 Line · SEPTA’s R5 rail line enters ton Avenue, where it turns to the northeast. It exits Whitemarsh Township from Springfield Township, the Township near the Fort Washington exit of the north of Camp Hill Road in the Stenton/Wissahickon Pennsylvania Turnpike. Along its course, the Norfolk District. It travels through the Township for a short Southern Freight Line passes Sunnybrook Golf Club, distance before exiting into Upper Dublin Township, crosses the Philadelphia Cricket Club, and travels near Germantown Academy. The R5’s Fort Washing- through, or near, large portions of Fort Washington ton Station is located along the line near Bethlehem State Park and Wissahickon Valley Park. Several sig- Pike. The R5 line traverses the edge of the Sandy nificant portions of trail already exist along this cor- Run Area of Fort Washington State Park. It crosses ridor. The Cross County Trail utilizes the Norfolk the Norfolk Southern railroad lines which travel in Southern Freight Line, from its entrance into the a north-south direction through the Township. The Township until it turns to the north at Joshua Road. Cross County Trail utilizes a small portion of the R5 At this point the Cross County Trail diverges from line corridor from Commerce Drive to Bethlehem the Norfolk Southern line for a short distance, before Pike. The Whitemarsh Township Comprehensive rejoining it at the south end of Fort Washington State Plan indicates a proposed trail which closely paral- Park. The trail again follows the Norfolk Southern lels the R5 Line from Bethlehem Pike to the point at Line until it crosses the Wissahickon Creek, at which which the line joins the Wissahickon Creek Corridor. point the trail turns north and joins the Wissahickon Extension of the existing trail portion along the re- Trail. A small spur of the Wissahickon Trail, which maining portion of the R5 line corridor would quick- follows Stenton Avenue, crosses the Norfolk South- ly expand the service area of both the Cross County ern Line shortly after the Cross County Trail diverg- and Wissahickon Creek Trails. es. An on-street sidewalk/pathway is proposed along the length of Joshua Road and would also cross the SEPTA R6 Line · The R6 rail line enters Whitemarsh rail right-of-way at this point. Township from the City of Philadelphia along the banks of the Schuylkill River, the Riverfront District. Trail Linkages The line runs through the Township in close prox- Open space linkages in the form of trails have been imity to the River and moves away from the river- detailed in the Whitemarsh Township Comprehen- bank as it enters the Borough of Conshohocken. The sive Plan of 2003. Most of the trails shown in the Schuylkill River Trail parallels the rail line in this Comprehensive Plan are proposed trails; however, area and is a popular resource for bicyclists, runners, there are extensive segments of existing trails. The walkers and rollerbladers. addition of the trails proposed in the plan will create · Whitemarsh Township Open Space Plan · 39 Chapter 3 · Community Background a comprehensive trail network that serves the major- Map #13 Existing Trails by District ity of Whitemarsh Township residents. In particular, AMBLER AMBLER AMBLER the proposed Joshua RoadUPPER Trail DUBLIN will enable residents UPPER DUBLIN UPPER DUBLIN in the Central District to connect with the resources in the Township and beyond. ��������������������� ��������������������� ��������������������� ������ ������ ������ WHITPAIN ��������� WHITPAIN ��������� WHITPAIN ��������� SPRINGFIELD SPRINGFIELD SPRINGFIELD ������� ���������� ������� ���������� ������� ���������� ����������� ����������� ����������� ������ ������ ������ PLYMOUTH ������� PLYMOUTH ������� PLYMOUTH
Recommended publications
  • Some Notes on the State-Owned Columbia and Philadelphia Railroad*

    Some Notes on the State-Owned Columbia and Philadelphia Railroad*

    SOME NOTES ON THE STATE-OWNED COLUMBIA AND PHILADELPHIA RAILROAD* By HUBERTIS CUMMINGS r IGURATIVELY speaking, on the subject of the Columbia F and Philadelphia Railroad one could go riding off-as did the Leacockian hero-in all directions. If one could adopt and adhere to one line of travel for it, the journey might not be, according to twentieth-century ideals of railway convenience and luxury, very comfortable. The state-built and state-owned railroad between William Penn's great city on the Delaware and the river town on the Susquehanna long known as Wright's Ferry emerged from a dilemma, and it was its eventual destiny to be implicated in a fiasco. The course of its history was as multifarious as was its inception. In nothing is the tale of it simple. To cover the many- sided story in one brief paper, then, is impossible. For the connec- tions of the Columbia and Philadelphia Railroad with the policy of public improvements adopted by the Commonwealth of Penn- sylvania in 1826 are not only connections with the canal fever of that era in the Keystone State. They are connections with both the Erie Canal in New York State and with a whole epoch of American transportation history. Historians who trace the succession of events leading to the public system of transportation and travel which was owned by Pennsylvania between 1827 and 1857, usually tell much of Wil- liam Penn,' David Rittenhouse, Provost William Smith,2 financier and promoter Robert Morris,3 and Legislator William Lehman,4 as *Paper read at the meeting of the Pennsylvania Historical Association at Dickinson College, Carlisle, October 21, 1949.
  • The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal

    The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal

    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1989 The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Stuart William Wells University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Wells, Stuart William, "The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal" (1989). Theses (Historic Preservation). 350. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Wells, Stuart William (1989). The Schuylkill Navigation and the Girard Canal. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/350 UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYLVANIA. LIBRARIES THE SCHUYLKILL NAVIGATION AND THE GIRARD CANAL Stuart William
  • 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update

    2020 Comprehensive Plan Update

    2020 Comprehensive Plan Update UPPER FREDERICK TOWNSHIP Montgomery County, PA Updated November 2020 by Tackett Planning, Incorporated Originally prepared January 2008 by CHPlanning Limited Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan UPPER FREDERICK TOWNSHIP OFFICIALS BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Troy Armstrong, Chairman William Tray, Vice-Chairperson Sean Frisco, Member TOWNSHIP MANAGER Jackie Tallon PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS Richard Buckman, Chairman Joseph Buick Robert Keenan William O’Donnell Jared Landis Township Building 3205 Big Road Obelisk, Pennsylvania 19492 Upper Frederick Township Comprehensive Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS: Chapter 1: Introduction & History...................................................................................... 2 1.1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Community Background ...................................................................................... 2 1.3 Regional Setting .................................................................................................. 4 1.4 Population ........................................................................................................... 7 1.5 Community Issues Survey .................................................................................... 9 Chapter 2: Resource Protection .....................................................................................
  • INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING in OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed

    INVESTING IN OUR FUTURE Quantifying the Impact of Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware River Watershed Report Prepared For: Prepared By: Executive Summary Completing the East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed will provide: 175 2 MILES OF MULTI-USE TRAIL 2,460 TEMPORARY JOBS $840M IN ANNUAL TOURISM BENEFITS ($4.8M/MILE LOCAL ECONOMIC IMPACT) $2.2B ONE-TIME ECONOMIC BENEFITS Table of Contents What is the East Coast Greenway? 5 The East Coast Greenway in the Delaware Watershed 6 What the Greenway Connects 8 Transport + Safety Benefits 10 Case Study: Jack A. Markell Trail 12 Economic Benefits + Planning for Equity 14 Case Study: Bristol Borough 20 Health Benefits 22 Environmental Benefits 24 Case Study: Riverfront North Partnership 26 Conclusion 28 Bartram’s Mile segment of East Coast Greenway along west bank of Schuylkill River in Philadelphia. East Coast Greenway Alliance photo Sources 30 On the cover: celebrations on Schuylkill River Trail Schuylkill Banks photos ME Calais Bangor Augusta Portland NH Delaware Portsmouth MA Boston Watershed NY Hartford New Haven CT Providence NJ RI PA New York Philadelphia Trenton Wilmington MD Baltimore Washington DC Annapolis DE Fredericksburg VA Richmond 4 Norfolk NC Raleigh Fayetteville New Bern Wilmington SC Myrtle Beach Charleston GA Savannah Brunswick Jacksonville St.Augustine FL Melbourne Miami Key West greenway.org What is the East Coast Greenway? The East Coast Greenway is developing into one of the nation’s longest continuous biking and walking paths, connecting 15 states and 450 communities from Key West, Florida, to Calais, Maine. The in-progress Greenway is a place that bicyclists, walkers, runners, skaters, horseback riders, wheelchair users, and cross-country skiers of all ages and abilities can enjoy.
  • Philadelphia and Camden Waterfronts NOAA Chart 12313

    Philadelphia and Camden Waterfronts NOAA Chart 12313

    BookletChart™ Philadelphia and Camden Waterfronts NOAA Chart 12313 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Published by the feet for the middle 800 feet of the span and 128 feet under the rest of the span. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration The wind direction for the summer is from the southwest, while National Ocean Service northwesterly winds prevail during the winter. The annual prevailing Office of Coast Survey direction is from the west-southwest. Destructive velocities are comparatively rare and occur mostly in gusts during summer www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov thunderstorms. Only rarely have hurricanes in the vicinity caused 888-990-NOAA widespread damage, then primarily through flooding. Flood stages in the Schuylkill River normally occur twice a year. Flood What are Nautical Charts? stages seldom last over 12 hours and occur after excessive falls of precipitation during summer thunderstorms. Flood stages in the Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show Delaware River are caused by abnormally high tides due to the water water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much “backing up” under the strong south or southeast winds. more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and Schuylkill River is navigable for 7.3 miles to Fairmount Dam, Fairmount efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial and is an important outlet for a part of the commerce of Philadelphia. ships that carry America’s commerce. They are also used on every Navy The Federal project provides for a channel 33 feet deep to Passyunk and Coast Guard ship, fishing and passenger vessels, and are widely Avenue bridge, thence 26 feet deep to Gibson Point, thence 22 feet carried by recreational boaters.
  • Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste D Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type D Award Allocatio Funding Types

    Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Alverthorpe Manor BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Cultural Park (6422) 11-3 11 Development $223,000 $136,900 Key - Community Abington Township TAP Trail- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township (1101296) 22-171 22 Trails $90,000 $90,000 Key - Community Ardsley Wildlife Sanctuary- BRC-PRD- Region 1 Abington Township Development 22-37 22 Development $40,000 $40,000 Key - Community Briar Bush Nature Center Master Site Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1007785) 20-12 20 Planning $42,000 $37,000 Key - Community Pool Feasibility Studies BRC-TAG- Region 1 Abington Township (1100063) 21-127 21 Planning $15,000 $15,000 Key - Community Rubicam Avenue Park KEY-PRD-1- Region 1 Abington Township (1) 1 01 Development $25,750 $25,700 Key - Community Demonstration Trail - KEY-PRD-4- Region 1 Abington Township Phase I (1659) 4 04 Development $114,330 $114,000 Key - Community KEY-SC-3- Region 1 Aldan Borough Borough Park (5) 6 03 Development $20,000 $2,000 Key - Community Ambler Pocket Park- Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Ambler Borough (1102237) 23-176 23 Development $102,340 $102,000 Key - Community Comp. Rec. & Park Plan BRC-TAG- Region 1 Ambler Borough (4438) 8-16 08 Planning $10,400 $10,000 Key - Community American Littoral Upper & Middle Soc/Delaware Neshaminy Watershed BRC-RCP- Region 1 Riverkeeper Network Plan (3337) 6-9 06 Planning $62,500 $62,500 Key - Rivers Keystone Fund Projects by Applicant (1994-2017) Propose DCNR Contract Requeste d Region Applicant Project Title # Round Grant Type d Award Allocatio Funding Types Valley View Park - Development BRC-PRD- Region 1 Aston Township (1100582) 21-114 21 Development $184,000 $164,000 Key - Community Comp.
  • The Schuylkill River Trail from the Past to the Present

    The Schuylkill River Trail from the Past to the Present

    M O N T G O M E R Y C O U N T Y P A T R A I L S Y S T E M The Schuylkill River Trail From the past to the present. From the historic river Extension. For those seeking public transportation to the trail, towns of Conshohocken, Norristown, and Pottstown to the SEPTA offers excellent access via regional rail service and bus rolling hills of Valley Forge National Historical Park. The lines in Miquon, Spring Mill, Conshohocken, and Norristown. Schuylkill River Trail in Montgomery County takes visitors Visit www.montcopa.org/schuylkillrivertrail for more through a rich blend of natural, cultural, and historical information or contact Montgomery County Division of Parks, resources. The trail runs through a variety of urban, Trails, & Historic Sites at 610.278.3555. suburban, and rural landscapes, offering nearly 20 miles to hikers, joggers, bicyclists, equestrians, and in-line skaters. Trail Rules The Schuylkill River Trail (SRT) is the spine of the • Trail speed limit is 15 mph Schuylkill River National and State Heritage Corridor. When completed, the trail will run over 100 miles from the coal region • Trail is open dawn to dusk of Schuylkill County to the Delaware River in Philadelphia. • No unauthorized motor vehicles are permitted on trail Evidence of several centuries of industrial use remains • Dogs must be leashed where river and canal navigation, quarrying of limestone and • Owners are responsible for cleaning up all pet waste iron ore, and production of iron and steel have succeeded each • No littering—please practice “Carry In - Carry Out” other as mainstays of this region’s economy.
  • Some Clips May Be Behind a Paywall. If You Need Access to These Clips, Email Me at Djagiela@Pa.Gov

    Some Clips May Be Behind a Paywall. If You Need Access to These Clips, Email Me at [email protected]

    Some clips may be behind a paywall. If you need access to these clips, email me at [email protected]. Top DEP Clips The Center Square: DEP announces improvements to program to help builders get low-interest loans for energy conservation projects https://www.thecentersquare.com/pennsylvania/dep-announces-improvements-to-program-to-help- builders-get-low-interest-loans-for-energy-conservation/article 66a9f6f8-8e52-11eb-b07d- 13921f274e75.html Herald Standard: Gov. Wolf encourages residents to 'Pick Up Pennsylvania' https://www.heraldstandard.com/sports/outdoors/gov-wolf-encourages-residents-to-pick-up- pennsylvania/article b1875666-8e52-11eb-b6ad-dfa74e351cf4.html MyChesCo: Gov. Wolf Encourages Residents to “Pick Up Pennsylvania” https://www.mychesco.com/a/news/pennsylvania/gov-wolf-encourages-residents-to-pick-up- pennsylvania/ Scranton Times: State to power up through sunlight https://www.thetimes-tribune.com/news/business/state-to-power-up-through- sunlight/article 787faf70-4e16-5321-b1cb-501b2f184552.html Allegheny Front: Chesapeake Fined $1.9 Million for Wetland, Stream Violations in PA https://www.alleghenyfront.org/chesapeake-fined-1-9-million-for-wetland-stream-violations-in-pa/ Mentions Mon Valley Independent: DEP closes N. Eagle dump site https://monvalleyindependent.com/2021/03/dep-closes-n-eagle-dump-site/ Mon Valley Independent: Landfill concerns expressed to DEP official https://monvalleyindependent.com/2021/03/landfill-concerns-expressed-to-dep-official/ Shamokin News-Item: Pollinator Patriots honor veterans at Kulpmont garden
  • Chapter 3.5 Southern Highlands Region 3.5 Southern Highlands Region

    Chapter 3.5 Southern Highlands Region 3.5 Southern Highlands Region

    Chapter 3.5 Southern Highlands Region 3.5 Southern Highlands Region 3.5 Southern Highlands Region mentioned are large resources there are also many smaller recreational opportunities scattered throughout the region. When The Southern Highlands Region is located within the southern totaled, the Southern Highlands Region as a whole has more portion of Berks County and bordered by the Metro Region to the than twice the existing recreational acreage recommended by the north and Lancaster and Chester Counties to the southwest and National Recreation & Park Association. southeast. Throughout this region is an abundance of recreational, ecological and historical resources. This region is Recreation considered to be one area of the County that is going to see a steady rise in population as more and more people move into the Recreation is mainly of the passive type in this region. There are area along the US 422 and Pennsylvania Turnpike corridors. large State and Federally-owned parks within the Southern New Morgan Borough has been the site of a number of ambitious Highlands and they provide much of the recreational development proposals that could contribute significantly to the opportunities to not only the citizens of the region but the citizens region’s population. of neighboring Counties as well as all of Berks County. School districts, municipalities and privately-owned facilities cater mainly The Southern Highlands Region has a multitude of recreational, to the local need of residents. Although there seems to be a ecological and historical resources with the majority being geared toward passive recreation. The Schuylkill River Greenway/Trail extends through this region ultimately winding its way to Philadelphia.
  • State of the Schuylkill River Watershed

    State of the Schuylkill River Watershed

    A Report on the S TATE OF THE SCHUYLKILL RIVER W ATERSHED 2002 Prepared by The Conservation Fund for the Schuylkill River Watershed Initiative T ABLE OF CONTENTS L IST OF FIGURES Forward ............................................................. 1 4. Public Awareness and Education 1 ...... Regional Location 2 ...... Physiographic Regions Introduction ....................................................... 2 Overview ........................................................... 27 3 ...... Percentage of Stream Miles by Stream 4 ...... Dams in the Schuylkill Watershed Enhancing Public Awareness ............................... 28 5 ...... Land Cover 1. The Watershed Today Educating the Next Generation .......................... 29 6 ...... 1990-2000 Population Change, by Municipality 7 ...... Land Development Trends, Montgomery County Overview ........................................................... 3 Environmental Education Centers ...................... 30 8 ...... 1970-95 Trends in Population and Land Consumption, Environmental Setting ........................................ 4 Special Recognition of the Schuylkill ................. 31 Montgomery County 9 ...... Water Supply Intakes Historical Influences ........................................... 5 10 .... Seasonal Relationships Between Water Withdrawals and River Flow 11 .... Water Withdrawals in the Schuylkill Watershed Land Use and Population Change....................... 6 5. Looking Out for the Watershed - Who is Involved 12 .... Monitoring Locations and Tributaries Surveyed
  • 2.0 the Planning Alternatives

    2.0 the Planning Alternatives

    2.0 THE PLANNING ALTERNATIVES LIVING WITH THE RIVER: Schuylkill River Valley National Heritage Area LIVING WITH THE RIVER: Schuylkill River Valley National Heritage Area Final Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement Final Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement 2.0 THE PLANNING ALTERNATIVES 2.1 ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED The planning process included consideration of a range of alternatives for the future management of the Schuylkill River Valley National Heritage Area. Four alternatives were developed and evaluated for their Alternatives Considered performance in meeting the mission and goals set forth in Section 1.3: the No Action Alternative (A) and three Action Alternatives (B, C, and • A: No Action D). The evaluation was based on the varying emphases placed by the alternatives on the 13 strategies presented in Section 1.3 to achieve the • B: Places mission and goals (Table 2-1). • C: Experiences As part of the planning process, a series of public meetings was • D: Layers (Preferred and conducted at which the alternatives were presented for review. Based Environmentally upon the evaluation of the alternatives and public comment, Alternative Preferred Alternative) D (Layers) was selected as the Preferred Alternative developed into the recommended plan described in Section 2.2. 2.1.1 Alternative A: No Action Alternative A does not propose any change to the current operation and management of the Schuylkill River Valley National Heritage Area. Although the Schuylkill River Valley has been designated as a National Heritage Area, current programs and levels of funding would continue to be administered by SRGA and no additional funding would be provided.
  • Pennsylvania's Return on Investment in the Keystone Recreation, Park

    Pennsylvania's Return on Investment in the Keystone Recreation, Park

    Pennsylvania’s Return on Investment in the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund Pennsylvania’s Return on Investment in the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund Right cover photo: Western Pennsylvania Conservancy. Printed on 100% recycled paper. ©2013 The Trust for Public Land. Project support was provided by The Doris Duke Charitable Foundation, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act, and the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds (FPW) in partnership with Richard King Mellon Foundation. FPW is an environmental nonprofit serving Pennsylvania’s water quality needs. To learn more about FPW, visit pennsylvaniawatersheds.org. Table of Contents Executive Summary 6 Introduction 9 Conservation 12 Investment in Land and Water Conservation 12 Natural Goods and Services 12 Highlighting the Economic Value of Natural Goods and Services 14 Return on Investment 16 Methodology 16 Results 17 Tourism and Outdoor Recreation 18 Visitor Spending 18 Outdoor Recreation 19 Hunting, Fishing, and Wildlife Watching 20 State Parks 21 Enhanced Property Values 22 Reduced Local Taxes 22 Quality of Life 23 Leveraged Private and Local Dollars 23 Parks, Trails, and Recreation 24 Job Creation 24 Visitor Spending 25 Enhanced Property Values 26 Cultural Institutions 28 Libraries 28 Job Creation 28 Additional Economic Benefits 28 Historic Preservation 31 Direct Economic Impact 31 Tourism 31 Property Values 33 Higher Education 33 Conclusion 34 References 35 Appendix: Methodology 38 Executive Summary The Trust for Public Land conducted an economic analysis of the return on Pennsylvania’s investment in land and water conservation through the Keystone Recreation, Park, and Conservation Fund and found that every $1 invested in land conservation returned $7 in natural goods and services to the Pennsylvania economy.