DOCSLIB.ORG

ARMAGEDDON and the Prophets of Doomsday I N Russia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

GARDNER ON THE WORLD BRAIN • THE CASE OF THE PETRIFIED GIRL • MULTIPLE PERSONALITY DISORDER Skeptical THE MAGAZINE FOR SCIENCE REASON Volume 23, No. 1 • January/Febr SPECIAL REPORT ARMAGEDDON and the prophets of Doomsday Fears of the Apocalypse M Bible and the Prophets of Doomd Pseu in Russia testing Dowsing m i,m- Alternative Medicine and Unregulated Remedies Published by the Committee R Scientific J^j Cation of Claims of the Paranormal THE COMMITTEE FOR THE SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATION OF CLAIMS OF THE PARANORMAL AT THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY-INTERNATIONAl (ADJACENT TO THE STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO) P AN INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy. State University of New York at Buffalo Barry Karr, Executive Director Joe Nickell. Senior Research Fellow Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director Matthew Nisbet Public Relations Director FELLOWS James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Thomas Gilovich, psychologist, Cornell Univ. Dorothy Nelkin, sociologist. New York Univ. Toronto Henry Gordon, magician, columnist, Joe Nickell,* senior research fellow, CSICOP Steve Allen, comedian, author, composer, Toronto Lee Nisbet,* philosopher, Medaille College pianist Stephen Jay Gould, Museum of Bill Nye, science educator and television Jerry Andrus, magician and inventor, Comparative Zoology, Harvard Univ. host, Nye Labs Albany, Oregon Susan Haack, Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts James E. Oberg, science writer Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of and Sciences, prof, of philosophy, Loren Pankratz, psychologist, Oregon Kentucky University of Miami Health Sciences Univ. Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, C. E. M. Hansel, psychologist, Univ, of Wales John Paulos, mathematician. Temple Univ. consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa. Al Hibbs, scientist. Jet Propulsion Laboratory W. V. Quine, philosopher, Harvard Univ. Barry Beyerstein, * biopsychologist, Simon Douglas Hofstadter, professor of human Milton Rosenberg, psychologist, Univ. of Fraser Univ., Vancouver, B.C., Canada understanding and cognitive science, Chicago Irving Biederman, psychologist, Univ. of Indiana Univ. Wallace Sampson, M.D., clinical professor Southern California Gerald Holton, Mallinckrodt Professor of of medicine, Stanford Univ. Susan Blackmore, psychologist, Univ. of the Physics and professor of history of science. Evry Schatzman, president. French Physics Harvard Univ. West of England, Bristol Association Ray Hyman,* psychologist, Univ. of Oregon Henri Broch, physicist. Univ. of Nice, France Eugenie Scott,* physical anthropologist. Leon Jaroff, sciences editor emeritus, Time Jan Harold Brunvand, folklorist. professor executive director, National Center for Sergei Kapitza, editor, Russian edition, of English, Univ. of Utah Science Education Vern Bullough, professor of history, Scientific American Glenn T. Seaborg, university professor of Philip J. Klass,* aerospace writer, engineer California State Univ. at Northridge chemistry, Univ. of California, Berkeley; Edwin C. Krupp, astronomer, director, Mario Bunge, philosopher, McGill University Nobel Prize laureate Griffith Observatory John R. Cole, anthropologist, editor, Thomas A. Sebeok, anthropologist. Paul Kurtz,' chairman. CSICOP National Center for Science Education linguist. Indiana Univ. Lawrence Kusche, science writer Robert Sheaffer, science writer F. H. C. Crick, biophysicist, Salk Inst, for Leon Lederman, emeritus director, Biological Studies, La Jolla. Calif; Nobel Elie A. Shneour, biochemist; author, Fermilab; Nobel laureate in physics director. Biosystems Research Institute. Prize laureate Lin Zixin, former editor. Science and Richard Dawkins, zoologist. Oxford Univ. La Jolla, Calif. Technology Daily (China) Dick Smith, film producer, publisher. Terrey L. Sprague de Camp, author, engineer Elizabeth Loftus, professor of psychology, Cornelis de Jager, professor of astro­ Hills, N.S.W.. Australia Univ. of Washington Robert Steiner, magician, author. physics, Univ. of Utrecht, the Netherlands Paul MacCready, scientist/engineer, Bernard Dixon, science writer, London, U.K. El Cerrito, Calif. AeroVironment. Inc., Monrovia, Calif. Jill Cornell Tarter, astronomer, SETI Paul Edwards, philosopher, editor, John Maddox, editor emeritus of Nature Institute, Mountain View, CA Encyclopedia of Philosophy David Marks, psychologist. Middlesex Carol Tavris, psychologist and author, Los Kenneth Feder, professor of anthropology, Polytech, England Angeles, Calif. Central Connecticut State Univ. Walter C. McCrone, microscopist, McCrone Stephen Toulmin, professor of philosophy, Antony Flew, philosopher, Reading Univ., Research Institute Univ. of Southern California U.K. Mario Mendez-Acosta, journalist and Marilyn vos Savant Parade magazine con­ Andrew Fraknoi, astronomer, Foothill science writer, Mexico City, Mexico tributing editor and CBS News correspon­ College, Los Altos Hills. Calif. Marvin Minsky, professor of media arts and dent Kendrick Frazier,* science writer, editor, sciences, M.I.T. Steven Weinberg, professor of physics and SKEPTICAL INQUIRER David Morrison, space scientist. NASA astronomy, Univ. of Texas at Austin; Nobel Yves Galifret. vice-president. Affiliated Ames Research Center Prize laureate Organizations: France Richard A. Muller, professor of physics, Marvin Zelen, statistician, Harvard Univ. Martin Gardner,* author, critic Univ. of Calif., Berkeley Murray Gell-Mann, professor of physics, H. Narasimhaiah, physicist, president. * Member. CSICOP Executive Council Santa Fe Institute; Nobel Prize laureate Bangalore Science Forum, India (Affiliations given for identification only.) Visit the CSICOP web site at http://www.csicop.org The SKI.E'IH'AI. INIJUIKUC (ISSN 0194-0730) ii published bimonthly by the Committee for the Articles, reports, reviews, and letters published in the SKI'mi AI INQUIRIH represent the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal. 1310 Sweet Home Rd.. Amherst. NY views and work of individual authors. Their publication does not necessarily constitute an 1*4228. Printed in U.S.A. Second-class postage paid at Amherst. New York, and additional endorsement by CSICOP or us members unless to stated mailing offices. Subscription prices: one year (six issues), $35; two years. $58; three years. $81 \ Copyright ©1998 by the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the single issue, $4.95. Canadian and foreign orders: Payment in VS. funds drawn on a U.S. bank Paranormal. All rights reserved. The SKEFTICAl INQUIIU.R is available on 16mm microfilm. must accompany orders; please add US$10 per year for shipping Canadian and foreign cus- 35mm microfilm, and 105mm microfiche from University Microfilms International and is tomcrs are encouraged to use Visa or MasterCard. indexed in the Reader's Guide to Periodical Literature Inquiries from the media and the public about the work of the Committee should be made Subscriptions and changes of address should be addressed to SKIPTKAI INQUWIH. Box to Paul Kurrz. Chairman. CSICOP. Box 703. Amherst, NY 14226-0703. Tel.: 716-656-1425. 703. Amherst. NY 14226-0703. Or call toll-free I -800-634-1610 (outside U.S. call 716-636- FAX: 716-636-1733. 1425). Old address as well as new are necessary for change of subscriber's address, with six Manuscripts, letters, books for review, and editorial inquiries should be addressed to weeks advance nonce SKFPIKAI INQUIRER subscribers may not speak on behalf of CSICOP Kendrick Frazier. Editor. SKOTICAI INQUIKIK. 944 Deer Drive NE. Albuquerque NM or the SKI.rTK'Al INCJUIKEIL 87122. FAX 505-828-2080 For Guide for Authors, see page 69 in the May/June issue, or Postmaster Send changes of address to SKEPIKAI INQUIKIK. Box 703. Amherst, NY send a fax request to the Editor. 14226-0703 ON THE COVER Illustration by Brad Skeptical Inquirer Marshall January/February 1999 • VOL 23, NO. 1 SPECIAL REPORT ARMAGEDDON AND THE PROPHETS OF DOOMSDAY Fears of the Apocalypse COLUMNS The Escape from Reason EDITOR'S NOTE Millennium hysteria has been with humankind for a long time, but when it is combhttd with doomsday prophecies, the result can be a dangerous flight NEWS AND COMMENT from reason. World's Longest Firewalk: Physicist Leads Hot Trek for Science in Pennsylvania / Illinois Files Complaint PAUL KURTZ Against Repressed Memory Doctors / Tapes Said to Show Sybil's Multiple Personalities Bogus / Host of The Bible and the Prophets of Doom Paranormal Radio Show Creates a Mystery of His Millenmalism, which suggests thai supernatural powers will soon estab­ Own / CSICOP Research Scholarship Set Up at Hertfordshire / APS Position on EMF Affirmed: 'No lish a perfect world, reflects a failure of nerve and the abandoning of Evidence of Health Effects' / 'Psychic' Sleuth Greta hope in human potential to resolve social and ecological problems. Alexander Dies 5 Despite the claims of divine revelations, it is possible to trace the social historical evolution of the beliefs that lie behind end-ofthe-age theology. NOTES OF A FRINGE-WATCHER GERALD A. LARUE The Internet: A World Brain? MARTIN GARDNER 1 2 New Russian Initiative to Defend INVESTIGATIVE FILES Science and Reason The Case of the Petrified Girl PAUL KURTZ JOE NICKELL 15 PSYCHIC VIBRATIONS Science and Pseudoscience in Russia Apocalypse Soon With the collapse of the Soviet Union and subsequent profound eco­ ROBERT SHEAFFER 18 nomic crisis, science in Russia is in a difficult state. The rampant social NEW BOOKS 55 disruption has been accompanied by a veritable flood of pseudoscience. The rise of irrationality and decline of reason may
Recommended publications
  • Michael Brant Shermer

    Michael Brant Shermer

    Curriculum Vitae Michael Brant Shermer 2761 N. Marengo Ave., Altadena, CA 91001 626/794-3119 (P), 626/794-1301 (F), [email protected] Education Ph.D. Claremont Graduate School: 1991 History of Science (Dissertation: Alfred Russel Wallace: Heretic Scientist. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Dissertation Information Service) M.A. California State University, Fullerton: 1978 Experimental Psychology B.A. Pepperdine University: 1976 Psychology/Biology Professional Positions 2010 – Present: Presidential Fellow, Chapman University 2007 - 2011: Adjunct Professor, Claremont Graduate University 1992 - Present: Founding Publisher/Editor-in-Chief, Skeptic magazine 1992 - Present: Executive Director, Skeptics Society 2015 - Present: Host, Science Salon Podcast 2001 - 2019: Contributing Editor and Monthly Columnist, Scientific American 1992 - 2015: Host, Skeptics Lecture Series at the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) 1998 - 2010: Science Correspondent, KPCC, 89.3 FM, NPR affiliate for L.A. 1999 - 2000 Consulting Producer/Host, Exploring the Unknown 13-hour TV series, Fox Family 1989 - 1998 Adjunct Professor, Cultural Studies Program, Occidental College 1991 - 1993 Adjunct Professor, History of Science, California State University, Los Angeles 1986 - 1991 Assistant Professor of Psychology, Glendale College 1980 - 1986 Instructor of Psychology, Glendale College Courses Taught Chapman University (2010-Present): Skepticism 101: How to Think Like a Scientist Honors Seminar: The Moral Arc of Science Honors Seminar: Evolution, Ethics, and Morality Claremont Graduate University (2007-2011): Evolution, Economics, and the Brain Science and Morality Occidental College (1989-1998): 1. Science: Its History and Impact from Copernicus to Einstein 2. Evolution: The History and Science of the Theory 3. European Intellectual and Cultural History 4. Science, Technology, and Culture (Core program team-taught course) 5.
  • Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11Th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA an Ancient City in Greece, the Capital of Laconia and the Most Powerful State of the Peloponnese

    Ancient History Sourcebook: 11th Brittanica: Sparta SPARTA AN ancient city in Greece, the capital of Laconia and the most powerful state of the Peloponnese. The city lay at the northern end of the central Laconian plain, on the right bank of the river Eurotas, a little south of the point where it is joined by its largest tributary, the Oenus (mount Kelefina). The site is admirably fitted by nature to guard the only routes by which an army can penetrate Laconia from the land side, the Oenus and Eurotas valleys leading from Arcadia, its northern neighbour, and the Langada Pass over Mt Taygetus connecting Laconia and Messenia. At the same time its distance from the sea-Sparta is 27 m. from its seaport, Gythium, made it invulnerable to a maritime attack. I.-HISTORY Prehistoric Period.-Tradition relates that Sparta was founded by Lacedaemon, son of Zeus and Taygete, who called the city after the name of his wife, the daughter of Eurotas. But Amyclae and Therapne (Therapnae) seem to have been in early times of greater importance than Sparta, the former a Minyan foundation a few miles to the south of Sparta, the latter probably the Achaean capital of Laconia and the seat of Menelaus, Agamemnon's younger brother. Eighty years after the Trojan War, according to the traditional chronology, the Dorian migration took place. A band of Dorians united with a body of Aetolians to cross the Corinthian Gulf and invade the Peloponnese from the northwest. The Aetolians settled in Elis, the Dorians pushed up to the headwaters of the Alpheus, where they divided into two forces, one of which under Cresphontes invaded and later subdued Messenia, while the other, led by Aristodemus or, according to another version, by his twin sons Eurysthenes and Procles, made its way down the Eurotas were new settlements were formed and gained Sparta, which became the Dorian capital of Laconia.
  • ANG 5012, Section 6423 Spring 2017 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY and FRINGE SCIENCE

    ANG 5012, Section 6423 Spring 2017 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY and FRINGE SCIENCE

    ANG 5012, section 6423 Spring 2017 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND FRINGE SCIENCE Time: Mondays, periods 7-9 (1:55 – 4:55) Place: TUR 2303 Instructor: David Daegling, Turlington B376 352-294-7603 [email protected] Office Hours: M 10:30 – 11:30 AM; W 1:00 – 3:00 PM. COURSE OBJECTIVES: This course examines the articulation and perpetuation of so-called paranormal and fringe scientific theories concerning the human condition. We will examine these unconventional claims with respect to 1) underlying belief systems, 2) empirical and logical foundations, 3) persistence in the face of refutation, 4) popular treatment by mass media and 5) institutional reaction. The course is divided into five parts. Part I explores forms of inquiry and considers the demarcation of science from pseudoscience. Part II concerns unconventional theories of human evolution. Part III investigates unorthodox ideas of human biology. Part IV examines claims of extraterrestrial and supernatural contact in the world today. Part V further scrutinizes institutional reaction to fringe science, popular coverage of science, and the culture of science in the contemporary United States. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: Attendance is mandatory. Unexcused absences (i.e., other than medical or family emergency) result in a half grade reduction of your final grade. Participation in group and class discussions is required (50% of your final grade). In addition, written work is required for each of the five parts of the course (50% of your grade). These will take the form of essays and short papers to be completed concurrently with our discussions of these topics. Late papers are subject to a full letter grade reduction.
  • Evidence-Based Alternative Medicine?

    Evidence-Based Alternative Medicine?

    (YLGHQFH%DVHG$OWHUQDWLYH0HGLFLQH" .LUVWLQ%RUJHUVRQ 3HUVSHFWLYHVLQ%LRORJ\DQG0HGLFLQH9ROXPH1XPEHU$XWXPQ SS $UWLFOH 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV '2,SEP )RUDGGLWLRQDOLQIRUPDWLRQDERXWWKLVDUWLFOH KWWSVPXVHMKXHGXDUWLFOH Access provided by Dalhousie University (13 Jul 2016 15:54 GMT) 05/Borgerson/Final/502–15 9/6/05 6:55 PM Page 502 Evidence-Based Alternative Medicine? Kirstin Borgerson ABSTRACT The validity of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is the subject of on- going controversy.The EBM movement has proposed a “hierarchy of evidence,” ac- cording to which randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses of RCTs provide the most reliable evidence concerning the efficacy of medical interventions. The evaluation of alternative medicine therapies highlights problems with the EBM hierarchy. Alternative medical researchers—like those in mainstream medicine—wish to evaluate their therapies using methods that are rigorous and that are consistent with their philosophies of medicine and healing.These investigators have three ways to relate their work to EBM.They can accept the EBM hierarchy and carry out RCTs when possible; they can accept the EBM standards but argue that the special characteristics of alternative medicine warrant the acceptance of “lower” forms of evidence; or they can challenge the EBM approach and work to develop new research designs and new stan- dards of evidence that reflect their approach to medical care. For several reasons, this last option is preferable. First, it will best meet the needs of alternative medicine prac- titioners. Moreover, because similar problems beset the evaluation of mainstream med- ical therapies, reevaluation of standards of evidence will benefit everyone in the med- ical community—including, most importantly, patients.
  • Downloading Physics Preprints from Arxiv Would Be Quite Unaware That a Paper in General Physics Has to Be Treated Differently to Papers in Other Categories

    Downloading Physics Preprints from Arxiv Would Be Quite Unaware That a Paper in General Physics Has to Be Treated Differently to Papers in Other Categories

    1 The Ecology of Fringe Science and its Bearing on Policy Harry Collins, Andrew Bartlett and Luis Reyes-Galindo School of Social Sciences, Cardiff University1 emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Introduction Fringe science has been an important topic since the start of the revolution in the social studies of science that occurred in the early 1970s.2 As a softer-edged model of the sciences developed, fringe science was a ‘hard case’ on which to hammer out the idea that scientific truth was whatever came to count as scientific truth: scientific truth emerged from social closure. The job of those studying fringe science was to recapture the rationality of its proponents, showing how, in terms of the procedures of science, they could be right and the mainstream could be wrong and therefore the consensus position is formed by social agreement. One outcome of this way of thinking is that sociologists of science informed by the perspective outlined above find themselves short of argumentative resources for demarcating science from non-science. The distinction with traditional philosophy of science, which readily demarcates fringe subjects such as parapsychology by referring to their ‘irrationality’ or some such, is marked.3 For the sociologist of scientific knowledge, that kind of demarcation comprises 1 This paper is joint work by researchers supported by two grants: ESRC to Harry Collins, (RES/K006401/1) £277,184, What is scientific consensus for policy? Heartlands and hinterlands of physics (2014-2016); British Academy Post-Doctoral Fellowship to Luis Reyes-Galindo, (PF130024) £223,732, The social boundaries of scientific knowledge: a case study of 'green' Open Access (2013-2016).
  • Athens' Domain

    Athens' Domain

    Athens’ Domain: The Loss of Naval Supremacy and an Empire Keegan Laycock Acknowledgements This paper has a lot to owe to the support of Dr. John Walsh. Without his encouragement, guid- ance, and urging to come on a theoretically educational trip to Greece, this paper would be vastly diminished in quality, and perhaps even in existence. I am grateful for the opportunity I have had to present it and the insight I have gained from the process. Special thanks to the editors and or- ganizers of Canta/ἄειδε for their own patience and persistence. %1 For the Athenians, the sea has been a key component of culture, economics, and especial- ly warfare. The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BC) displayed how control of the waves was vital for victory. This was not wholly apparent at the start of the conflict. The Peloponnesian League was militarily led by Sparta who was the greatest land power in Greece; to them naval warfare was excessive. Athens, as the head of the Delian League, was the greatest sea power in Greece whose strengths lay in their navy. However, through a combination of factors, Athens lost control of the sea and lost the war despite being the superior naval power at the war’s outset. Ultimately, Athens lost because they were unable to maintain strong naval authority. The geographic position of Athens and many of its key resources ensured land-based threats made them vulnerable de- spite their naval advantage. Athens also failed to exploit their naval supremacy as they focused on land-based wars in Sicily while the Peloponnesian League built up a rivaling navy of its own.
  • ANG 5012, Section 6423 Fall 2011 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY

    ANG 5012, Section 6423 Fall 2011 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY

    ANG 5012, section 6423 Fall 2011 FANTASTIC ANTHROPOLOGY AND FRINGE SCIENCE Time: Mondays, periods 8-10 (3:00 – 6:00) Place: TUR B304 Instructor: David Daegling, Turlington B376 392-2253 x245 [email protected] Office Hours: MW 10:00 – 11:00 AM; W 2:00 – 3:00 PM. COURSE OBJECTIVES: This course examines the articulation and perpetuation of so- called paranormal and fringe scientific theories concerning the human condition. We will examine these unconventional claims with respect to 1) underlying belief systems, 2) empirical and logical foundations, 3) persistence in the face of refutation, 4) popular treatment by mass media and 5) institutional reaction. The course is divided into five parts, corresponding to major assignments (see below). Part I explores forms of inquiry and considers the demarcation of science from pseudoscience. Part II concerns “crank” theories of human evolution. Part III investigates unorthodox ideas of human biology. Part IV examines claims of extraterrestrial and supernatural contact in the world today. Part V further scrutinizes institutional reaction to fringe science, popular coverage of science, and the culture of science in the contemporary United States. COURSE REQUIREMENTS: Attendance is mandatory. Unexcused absences (i.e., other than medical or family emergency) result in a half grade reduction of your final grade. Participation in class discussions is required (25% of your final grade). In addition, written work is required for each of the five parts of the course (75% of your grade). These will take the form of essays and short papers to be completed concurrently with our discussions of these topics. Late papers are subject to a full letter grade reduction.
  • How Scientific Is Chemistry?

    How Scientific Is Chemistry?

    How Scientific is Chemistry? Sebastian Kozuch Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva 841051, Israel. [email protected] To my father, who loves philosophy and science, but is not really engaged into philosophy of science. Abstract ϕ for philosophy, χ for chemistry. Is there a connection? Is there any interaction? Do chemists have something useful to learn from philosophers? Do philosophers from chemists? How can we define if chemistry is a science, or at least trustworthy? Which disciplines, styles and personalities are progressive in chemistry? Which ones are truth-seekers, progress-seekers or profit-seekers? Is there a point in asking these questions? Is there even an answer to them? Introduction composing it in a light tone, with more interest in presenting an overall idea and having an amusing reading than in seeking for Yes, of course chemistry is a science. That is beyond the point. accuracy or completeness (this is for you, reviewer two! 1). In The question is not if it is a science, but how good a science is it. doing so, and slightly in the style of some renaissance discussion Or, as we can put it, what is the scientificity level of chemistry, a books, I will introduce two characters that will aid in the depiction term defined as the degree or quality of the discipline or project of concepts and viewpoints: Tris the Chemist, and her workmate, (compare to “viscosity”, “luminosity” or “exergonicity”). To be clear, Kris the Chemist. Tris and Kris will act as different persons on in some sense chemistry might even be considered the top each section, always contradicting the other, always showing a science: It does not confront the complete unknown solely with different style of chemists, always believing their way is the best statistical analysis, such as in many areas of life sciences, and it way (any similarity to actual persons is purely coincidental; or does not participate in purely esoterical mathematics, such as in maybe not).
  • Issue-03-14.Pdf

    Issue-03-14.Pdf

    SKEPTICAL INQUIRER Vol. 17. No. 3 Spring 1993/$6.25 FACILITATED COMMUNICATION ? Miracle or Mirage? Al Gore: Education tor Science Richard Dawkins: The 'Awe' Factor Evry Schatzman: A Threat to Science Martin Gardner: E Prime and Isness Donald Tarter: Sale Science with SETI CSICOP Dallas Conference Published by the Committee for the Scientific investigation of Claims of the Paranormal THE SKEPTICAL INQUIRER is the official journal of the Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, an international organization. Editor Kendrick Frazier. Editorial Board James E. Alcock, Barry Beyerstein, Susan J. Blackmore, Martin Gardner, Ray Hyman, Philip J. Klass, Paul Kurtz, Joe Nickell, Lee Nisbet. Consulting Editors Robert A. Baker, William Sims Bainbridge, John R. Cole, Kenneth L. Feder, C. E. M. Hansel, E. C. Krupp, David F. Marks, Andrew Neher, James E. Oberg, Robert Sheaffer, Steven N. Shore. Managing Editor Doris Hawley Doyle. Contributing Editor Lys Ann Shore. Business Manager Mary Rose Hays. Assistant Business Manager Sandra Lesniak. Chief Data Officer Richard Seymour. Computer Assistant Michael Cione. Production Paul E. Loynes. Art Linda Hays. Audio Technician Vance Vigrass. Librarian Jonathan Jiras. Staff Elizabeth Begley, Ron Nicholson, Alfreda Pidgeon, Ranjit Sandhu, Sharon Sikora, Glen Winford. Cartoonist Rob Pudim. The Committee for the Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal Paul Kurtz, Chairman; professor emeritus of philosophy, State University of New York at Buffalo. Barry Karr, Executive Director and Public Relations Director. Lee Nisbet, Special Projects Director. Fellows of the Committee James E. Alcock,* psychologist, York Univ., Toronto; Robert A. Baker, psychologist, Univ. of Kentucky; Stephen Barrett, M.D., psychiatrist, author, consumer advocate, Allentown, Pa.
  • The Science of Software Engineering the Science of Software Engineering

    The Science of Software Engineering the Science of Software Engineering

    The Science of Software Engineering Marvin Zelkowitz Department of Computer Science University of Maryland College Park, Maryland [email protected] ESEM - 2009 1 ESEM – October 2009 A Need for a The Science of Software Engineering Marvin Zelkowitz Department of Computer Science University of Maryland College Park, Maryland [email protected] ESEM - 2009 2 ESEM – October 2009 1 Organization of talk Some personal comments on how I arrived at the theme of this talk What are the issues in developing a science of software engineering? What’s next? ESEM – October 2009 3 So what have I been doing for the past 40 years? Most of my professional life has been at the University of Maryland, teaching and doing research in the general area of software engineering. But those who know me, know that I have three other areas of great interest. ESEM – October 2009 4 2 One is attending science fiction conventions ESEM – October 2009 5 A second is my interest in model railroading Layout obviously unfinished. ESEM – October 2009 6 3 A third is that I consider myself a professional skeptic ESEM – October 2009 7 A third is that I consider myself a professional skeptic I belong to an organization of skeptics. Ha! Ha! ESEM – October 2009 8 4 A third is that I consider myself a professional skeptic That’s No! not true! You can’t do that! It’s all bogus! ESEM – October 2009 9 A third is that I consider myself a professional skeptic What does this really mean? And how does this relate to software engineering? This is the general theme of the rest of this talk.
  • Chapter 2 - the Transpersonal Nature of the Physical Body

    Chapter 2 - the Transpersonal Nature of the Physical Body

    1 Chapter 2 - The Transpersonal Nature of the Physical Body INTRODUCTION A glimpse of the transpersonal nature of the physical body Mr. Wright‟s experience also provides us a The incredible case of Mr. Wright. In 1956, a healthy glimpse of the true transpersonal nature of the physical and vibrantly active individual named Mr. Wright body. The “transpersonal” nature of the physical body developed lymphosarcoma, cancer of the lymph nodes. refers to its transformative capacity to extend and expand His condition had deteriorated to such an extent that the biological processes beyond their usual physiological tumors in his neck, groin, chest, and abdomen had grown parameters to encompass nonphysical aspects of life, to the size of oranges; his chest had to be emptied of one mind and consciousness, and even transcend the to two liters of milky fluid every other day. Doctors did limitations of time and space under certain circumstances. not believe that he had much longer to live. Mr. Wright, It refers to the physical body‟s potential to direct and use however, has heard about an upcoming clinical test of a its energy to richly form from itself, from its biological new experimental drug, called Krebiozen, and pleaded components and inner experience, with a sense of with them to include him in the study. Even though Mr. meaning and purpose, a broad range of possibilities for Wright was past the point of saving, the doctors gave in to human transformative capacity and extraordinary his persistent requests and entered him into the clinical functioning. To start, let us consider twelve varieties of trials of what was later to prove to be a worthless drug.
  • Sparta Made a Sian Fleet Off Cecryphalea, Between Epidaurus and Aegina

    Sparta Made a Sian Fleet Off Cecryphalea, Between Epidaurus and Aegina

    3028 land at Halieis in Argolis but victorious against a Peloponne- to back out of her alliance with Athens, and Sparta made a sian fleet off Cecryphalea, between Epidaurus and Aegina. Thirty-year truce with Argos to clear its access to Attica Alarmed by this Athenian activity in the Saronic Gulf, Ae- gina entered the war against Athens. In 458 BC in a great sea After the Truce battle the Athenians captured seventy Aeginetan and Pelo- Freed from fighting in Greece, the Athenians sent a fleet of ponnesian ships, landed on the island, and laid siege to the two hundred ships, under Cimon, to campaign in Cyprus. Cit- town of Aegina. With substantial Athenian forces being tied ium in southeast Cyprus was besieged, but food shortage and down in Egypt and Aegina, Corinth judged it was a good time Cimon's death caused a general retreat northeastwards to Sa- to invade the Megarid. The Athenians scraped together a lamis. They were attacked by a Persian force of Cyprians, force of men too old and boys too young for ordinary military Phoenicians and Cilicians. The Athenians defeated this force service and sent it under the command of Myronides to re- by both land and sea then sailed back to Greece. lieve Megara. The resulting battle was indecisive, but the After Xerxes' invasion in 479 BC the Persians had continu- Athenians held the field at the end of the day. About twelve ally lost territory and by 450 BC they were ready to make days later the Corinthians returned to the site but the Atheni- peace.