A Critical Examination of the Nature of the Public Participation Process: a Case of Solomon Mahlangu Freedom Square Project
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment School of Architecture and Planning Department of Urban and Regional Planning BSc URP Research Report (ARPL 4016) A CRITICAL EXAMINATION OF THE NATURE OF THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS: A CASE OF SOLOMON MAHLANGU FREEDOM SQUARE PROJECT Ntokozo Vincent Khanyile (0419602v) Supervisor: Professor Claire Benit-Gbaffou A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, School of Architecture and Planning at the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Bachelor of Science Urban and Regional Planning with Honours. Johannesburg, November 2014. ii DECLARATION I declare that this is my own unaided work. It is being submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirements of Bachelor of Science in Urban and Regional Planning with Honours to the Department of Urban and Regional Planning, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. It has not been submitted before for degree or examination to any other University. Signed on this.................Day of ....................2014. Signature…………………………………… iii ABSTRACT This research study sought to evaluate the participation process which was put into practice by the Tshwane City Council as part of implementing the Solomon Mahlangu Freedom Square (SMFS) project in 2012. NMA Effective Social Strategies were appointed by the City to facilitate the public participation process and Ikemeleng Architects to do the design of the square. The square is a public space of heritage significance to the locals and its upgrading bears a remembrance devoted to Solomon Mahlangu and other apartheid struggle heroes from Mamelodi Township. Accordingly, a variety of local organisations were invited to share their stories and memories around this memorial marking. In turn, this would help the designers of the space to collate information which would be handy for the design of the space. This study then sought to investigate the nature of the public participation process that was used in the SMFS project. It examines the rationale behind the promotion of participation in this project, the methods used. Furthermore, it analyses the participants’ interests, their roles and inputs which they contributed into the design brief. Hence, the study contributes to the radical theorist’s responses to the mainstreaming of participation that have tended to view participation as dual, i.e. as means to an end (participation to achieve certain development objectives) or an end in itself. Indeed participation holds a promise of mankind emancipation from the oppressive system of power. However, some scholars have observed that participation could be used as a way of co-opting local organisations or civil society and communities into top down development schemes that serve interests of those in power. On the contrary, others have argued that civil society is in place to guard against the exercise of power by the state or those with private interest and thus aiding people’s participation at grassroots level. This report recounts the different perspectives highlighted above in the experience of the SMFS project. It employs data pertinent to the project and in-depth interviews to answer the central question: what was the nature of the public participation process employed in the design of SMFS? The study then seeks to contribute to the understanding of different denotations and procedures of participation. While governments are requires to streamline participation, the study also adds the understanding of civil society’s role and the need for is mobilisation in public participation. The researcher argues that participation spaces and methods should be flexible to allow collective action amongst the state, civil society and communities. Furthermore, the paper argues that participants should begin to take a more intricate process of engaging plans and not to merely shape them through partial inputs and fragmentary processes. iv AKNOWLEDGEMENTS To the most high Jah who does great wonders…. what he blesses, no one can curse! Claire Benit-Gbaffou…. my dear Supervisor, you door has always been open. Thanks for your continuous encouragement and believing in me and I am grateful and thankful for you guidance and for seeing greatness in me. I would like to thank the residents of and leadership of Mamelodi without whom this research report would not have been a success. MNA Effective Social Strategists…. You are a true inspiration and thank you for contributing positively in our society. Mama….thanks for all thy sacrifices and prayers. You are a great pillar of strength in my life. I cannot forget the URP Honours class of 2014 with whom we have shared sleepless nights, successes and failures and a very Memorable trip to Maputo. v CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................... iv AKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ v TABLE OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................ x LIST OF ACRONYMS ........................................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I: MAPPING THE DIRECTIONS ......................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2. Case Study Background ......................................................................................... 1 1.3. Problem Statement ................................................................................................. 3 1.4. Rationale ................................................................................................................ 5 1.4.1. The Solomon Mahlangu Freedom Square Upgrade ......................................... 6 1.4.2. Public Participation: a common practice ........................................................... 6 1.5. Aim of the Research Study ..................................................................................... 8 1.5.1. Research Questions ........................................................................................ 9 1.5. Significance of the Study......................................................................................... 9 1.6. Research Design and Methodology .......................................................................... 10 1.6.1. Case Study ........................................................................................................ 10 1.6.2. Qualitative research ........................................................................................... 10 1.6.3. Interviews ........................................................................................................... 11 1.6.4. Study Limitations ................................................................................................ 13 1.6.5. Ethical Considerations........................................................................................ 13 1.7. Chapter outline ......................................................................................................... 14 CHAPTER II: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: A MULTIFACETED AND MAINSTREAM DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT .............................................................................................. 16 2.1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 16 2.2. Participation: A Concept Defined .............................................................................. 16 2.3. Origins of Participation .............................................................................................. 18 2.4. Evolution of Urban Panning Towards Participation ................................................... 18 2.5. Arnstein’s Ladder of participation .............................................................................. 19 2.6. Pretty’s Typology of Participation .............................................................................. 21 2.7. Mainstreaming of Participation .................................................................................. 23 2.7.1. The African Charter on Participation ................................................................... 24 2.7.2. The International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) .............................. 24 2.8. Communicative planning .......................................................................................... 25 2.9. Role of power in decision making ............................................................................. 26 2.10. Participation: The New Tyranny? ............................................................................ 27 vi 2.11. Different Strategies of Participation ......................................................................... 28 2.11.1. Information sharing strategies .......................................................................... 28 2.11.2. Consulting strategies ........................................................................................ 28 2.11.3. Decision-making strategies .............................................................................. 29 2.11.4. Initiating action strategies ................................................................................