Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Introduction Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49698-8 — Elementary Particle Physics Andrew J. Larkoski Excerpt More Information 1 Introduction Particle physics is the study of the fundamental principles of Nature. Within the purview of particle physics are some of the deepest questions we can ask, like “What is responsible for mass?” or “Why are there three spatial and one time dimensions?” These are such big questions that no individual or even individual country can hope to answer them alone. Contemporary particle physics is truly an international endeavor, with scientists from nearly every country on Earth involved in the major experiments. Today’s particle physicist may regularly travel to conferences in Argentina, visit collaborators in Japan, watch a live news conference about a major discovery from Switzerland, or even collect data at the South Pole. It is also a dynamic field, with numerous new results in particle physics published every week testing those theories that we have or suggesting new ones. The liveliness and brisk rate at which ideas are transferred in this field is largely due to particle physics having one of the largest and most widely used preprint article servers in all of science. These reasons also make taking a course on particle physics attractive to many physics students. All of the machinery, formalism, insight, and tools that you have gained as a physics student is essential for studying particle physics. This involves the whole range of advanced physics courses: • Classical Mechanics. Lagrangians and Hamiltonians are the principle way in which we express a system in particle physics. • Special Relativity. The particles we explore are traveling at or near the speed of light, c. • Quantum Mechanics. The particles and physical systems we investigate are extremely small, so the fundamental quanta of action, , is necessary in our analysis. • Statistical Mechanics. Particles are classified by their intrinsic spin, which defines them as fermions or bosons. • Electromagnetism. Likely electromagnetism, through Maxwell’s equations, is the first field theory that you encounter in physics courses. The language of particle physics is mathematics. From complex analysis to Fourier transforms, group theory and representation theory, linear algebra, distribution theory, and statistics myriad fields of mathematics are vital to articulate the principles, theories, and data of particle physics. As we will see in this book, the physics is extremely helpful in guiding the mathematical expressions. The goal of this book is to use the intuition gained through other physics courses and apply it to particle physics, which gets us a long way toward understanding, without just blindly following the mathematics. The particle physics introduced in this book is also the gateway to quantum field theory, the result of the harmonious marriage of quantum mechanics and special relativity. 1 © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49698-8 — Elementary Particle Physics Andrew J. Larkoski Excerpt More Information 2 Introduction A complete treatment of quantum field theory is beyond the scope of this book, but we will see glimpses of a richer underlying structure as the book progresses. In particular, quantum field theory is the framework in which three of the four fundamental forces of Nature are formulated. The three forces are electromagnetism, the strong force, and the weak force. The strong and weak forces are the focus of most of this book, with aspects of electromagnetism studied throughout. Quantum field theory enables a formalism which produces predictions that can be compared to data, and it is often (and rightfully!) stated that quantum field theory is the most wide-reaching and precise theory of Nature that exists. This chapter serves as the overview that invites you to study this rich field. Our goal is to frame the rest of the book, which necessitates a review of the forces of Nature, a preview of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, and a glimpse of the Large Hadron Collider, the currently running and most superlative particle physics experiment ever. We also need to introduce natural units to describe particle physics phenomena, and we find that familiar SI units are woefully inadequate. 1.1 A Brief History of Forces Interactions between particles can be expressed through the four fundamental forces. Gravity is the force that was first understood at some analytical level. Gravity is a universally attractive force that couples to energy and momentum. By “universally attractive” we mean that two particles are always attracted to one another through gravity. By “couples” we mean that the strength of the gravitational force is proportional to the energy of the particle. For particles with slow velocities with respect to the speed of light, the energy to which gravity couples is just the mass of the particle. The strength of the force of gravity, defined by either Newton’s universal law of gravitation or general relativity, is quantified by Newton’s constant, GN. For example, in Newton’s theory, the force of gravity between two masses m1 and m2 separated by distance r is G m m F = − N 1 2 ˆr , (1.1) g |r|2 where ˆr is a unit vector in the direction of r. We say that GN is the “strength of coupling” of gravity, or “coupling constant” for short. If GN is larger, the force is larger; if GN is smaller, the force is smaller. In SI units, the value of GN is −11 3 −1 −2 GN = 6.67 × 10 m kg s . (1.2) It turns out that, in appropriate units that we will discuss further later in this chapter, GN is incredibly tiny. Gravitational forces are completely ignorable for any microscopic experiment involving individual particles, like electrons or protons. The next force that was understood is electromagnetism. Unlike gravity, which is universally attractive because mass is always positive, electromagnetism can be either attractive or repulsive (or neutral). Particles or other objects can have positive, negative, © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49698-8 — Elementary Particle Physics Andrew J. Larkoski Excerpt More Information 3 1.2 The Standard Model of Particle Physics or no charge and the relative sign of charges determines whether the force is attractive or repulsive. The electric force between two charges q1 and q2 separated by distance r is 1 q1q2 Fe = 2 ˆr . (1.3) 4πǫ0 |r| −1 Here, the factor of (4πǫ0) is the coupling constant of electromagnetism. The value of ǫ0 in SI units is −12 −1 ǫ0 = 8.85 × 10 F · m , (1.4) where F is the SI unit of the farad. In appropriate units to enable comparison, this is billions and billions of times larger than the coupling of gravity, GN. Electricity and magnetism are intimately related as an electric field in one reference frame produces a magnetic field in another reference frame. This is also the starting point for special relativity, which we’ll review in Chapter 2. This was the story at the end of the nineteenth century. Knowing the mass and charge of an object is sufficient to determine how it will interact with any other object, assuming that the only forces are gravity and electromagnetism. This is also the point where this book begins, at the beginning of the twentieth century. At this time, physics was undergoing huge revolutions: in addition to the formulation of the modern pillars of relativity and quantum mechanics, the electron was recently discovered, as was the nuclear structure of the atom, and even odder things like superconductivity. A nineteenth century physicist was completely powerless to address these phenomena and understand them. They are not described strictly within the paradigm of Newtonian gravity and Maxwellian electromagnetism. Throughout the twentieth century, more and more particles and interactions were discovered: the positron, the anti-particle of the electron; neutrinos, very light cousins to the electron that are electrically neutral and seem to pass through nearly everything; the muon, similar to the electron but more massive; and so on. Near the end of the 1960s, hundreds of new particles had been discovered and their properties (like mass, charge, and intrinsic spin) measured. It was looking like quite a mess, with no clear organizing principle. However, in the late 1960s through the late 1970s, heroic efforts from theoretical and experimental physicists around the world yielded a simple underlying framework that could explain all experimental results. It became known as the Standard Model of Particle Physics. 1.2 The Standard Model of Particle Physics The Standard Model consists of all but one of the fundamental particles and forces that are important in our experiments. It provides an organizing principle for how to construct more complicated objects from these basic building blocks. A fundamental particle is one which we believe is truly elementary: it has no spatial extent (it is a point) and is not made up of any more fundamental parts. For example, hydrogen is not fundamental because it © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-49698-8 — Elementary Particle Physics Andrew J. Larkoski Excerpt More Information 4 Introduction Fig. 1.1 Artistic representation of the 17 Standard Model particles. The top outer ring are the six quarks, the bottom outer ring are the six leptons, the middle ring are the four force-carrying bosons, and the center is the Higgs boson. Courtesy of Particle Fever, LLC. consists of a proton and an electron, while it is believed that the electron is fundamental. In this book, we will study the theoretical predictions and experimental justification of the Standard Model. The particles of the Standard Model can be artistically arranged and represented as a series of concentric rings displayed in Fig.
Recommended publications
  • The Higgs Boson!
    MEET THE TIME MAGAZINE PARTICLE OF THE YEAR: THE HIGGS BOSON! Saptaparna Bhattacharya July 11th - 22nd, 2016 Lets start at the beginning! http://poy.time.com/2012/12/19/the-higgs-boson-particle-of-the-year/ Introduction • I am Saptaparna Bhattacharya, a post-doctoral scholar in the department of Physics and Astronomy at Northwestern University in Chicago. • My research is based on the data from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. • I have worked on the first published result that uses the Higgs boson as a probe for New Physics. • My interest lies in various models of New Physics, ranging from SuperSymmetry to exploring the possibility of finding microscopic black holes. • I am also interested in exploring interesting techniques for data analysis. But, enough about me, where are you guys from? Current Enrollment We are a class of 17 students! Let me quickly check to see if you are all here! What we did last summer! Di-photon invariant mass h_InvariantMass_PhPh Higgs to ZZ invariant mass h_InvariantMass_HZZ Entries 85893 Entries 13235 30000 Mean 125.9 Mean 124.2 RMS 2.636 RMS 3.147 5000 25000 Events/2.0 GeV Events/2.0 GeV 20000 4000 Higgs boson mass distribution Higgs boson mass distribution 15000 3000 10000 2000 5000 1000 0 0 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 m [GeV] m [GeV] γγ µ µ µ µ Di-muon invariant mass h_InvariantMass_MuMu Tranverse Mass with Muons Entries 37122 h_TransverseMass_Mu Mean 90.66 Entries 37791 RMS 4.506 5000 4000 Mean 65.9 RMS 15.36 3500 4000 Events/GeV Events/1.0 GeV 3000 Z boson mass distribution 3000 2500 W boson transverse 2000 mass distribution 2000 1500 1000 1000 500 0 0 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 m [GeV] mµµ [GeV] T Outline • The course is roughly structured into two parts: • Laying down the fundamentals.
    [Show full text]
  • Outreach Activities, Web, Radio&TV, Non-Specialized Conferences And
    1 Laboratoire de Physique des Hautes Energies (LPHE) Outreach activities, web, radio&TV, non-specialized conferences and publications April 2009 { March 2016 We list here activities aiming at making our research known to less specialized audiences, or more generally to the public at large. April 2015 { March 2016 1. C. Fitzpatrick, guide for visit at CERN of students from Campbell College Belfast, March 19, 2016. 2. O. Schneider, visit organized at CERN (at LHCb, CAST, and LHC magnets) for 60 Bachelor students of EPFL, November 17, 2015. 3. I. Komarov, \On the irreversibility of time and Einstein's theory", online lecture for children in the framework of the \Scientists to kids" project, Experimentarium Museum, Moscow, Russia, October 24, 2015. 4. CERN Courier: \LHCb improves trigger in Run 2", September 25, 2015. 5. O. Schneider, participation in an interdisciplinary podium discussion \Le boson de Higgs { architecte de l'Univers ?" after a public screening of the movie \Particle Fever" (flyer), Lyc´ee-Coll`egedes Creusets, Sion, Switzerland, September 25, 2015. 6. LHCb public web site: \First LHC run2 physics results: measurement of J= production cross- sections in pp collisions at 13 TeV", July 24, 2015. 7. EPFL news: \EPFL contributes to breakthrough experiment at CERN"(\L'EPFL contribue `aune d´ecouverte majeure au CERN", May 21, 2015. 8. EPFL news: \Tatsuya Nakada awarded Honorary Doctorate from University of Zurich"(\Tatsuya Nakada honor´epar l'Universit´ede Zurich"), May 4, 2015. 9. V. Battista, \LHCb: tra bellezza e asimmetrie", science popularization article published in \Quaderni di scienza e scienziati molisani", 2015. April 2014 { March 2015 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Speed of Light and Rates of Clocks in the Space Generation Model of Gravitation, Part 1
    GravitationLab.com Speed of Light and Rates of Clocks in the Space Generation Model of Gravitation, Part 1 1 R. BENISH( ) (1) Eugene, Oregon, USA, [email protected] Abstract. — General Relativity’s Schwarzschild solution describes a spherically symmetric gravi- tational field as an utterly static thing. The Space Generation Model (SGM) describes it as an absolutely moving thing. The SGM nevertheless agrees equally well with observations made in the fields of the Earth and Sun, because it predicts almost ex- actly the same spacetime curvature. This success of the SGM motivates deepening the context—especially with regard to the fundamental concepts of motion. The roots of Einstein’s relativity theories thus receive critical examination. A particularly illumi- nating and widely applicable example is that of uniform rotation, which was used to build General Relativity (GR). Comparing Einstein’s logic to that of the SGM, the most significant difference concerns the interpretation of the readings of accelerom- eters and the rates of clocks. Where Einstein infers relativity of motion and space- time symmetry, it is argued to be more logical to infer absoluteness of motion and spacetime asymmetry. This approach leads to reassessments of the essential nature of matter, time, and the dimensionality of space, which lead in turn to some novel cos- mological consequences. Special emphasis is given to the model’s deviations from standard predictions inside matter, which have never been tested, but could be tested by conducting a simple experiment. PACS 04.80.Cc – Experimental tests of gravitational theories. 1. – Introduction; Intended Audience Beware ye, all those bold of spirit who want to suggest new ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Curating the Collider: Using Place to Engage Museum Visitors with Particle Physics
    Science Museum Group Journal Curating the collider: using place to engage museum visitors with particle physics Journal ISSN number: 2054-5770 This article was written by Alison Boyle, Harry Cliff 10-09-2014 Cite as 10.15180; 140207 Research Curating the collider: using place to engage museum visitors with particle physics Published in Autumn 2014, Issue 02 Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/140207 Abstract CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest particle physics facility, provides museological opportunities and challenges. Visitor interest in cutting-edge physics, with its high media profile, is tempered by anxiety about understanding complex content. The topic does not readily lend itself to traditional museum showcase-dominated displays: the technology of modern particle physics is overwhelmingly large, while the phenomena under investigation are invisible. For Collider, a major temporary exhibition, the Science Museum adopted a ‘visit to CERN’ approach, recreating several of the laboratory’s spaces. We explore the effectiveness of this approach, at a time when historical studies of scientific laboratories and museum reconstructions of spaces are subject to renewed interest. Component DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/140207/001 Keywords Science Museum, Collider, Large Hadron Collider, CERN, particle physics, place, space, re-creation, room set, museum Introduction Collider: step inside the world’s greatest experiment ran at the Science Museum from November 2013–May 2014 and is touring internationally until 2017. The exhibition covers the work of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, the world’s largest particle physics facility. Strategically, the subject matter had obvious appeal for the Science Museum, with its long term ambitions to tackle complex scientific topics, attract more adult visitors, and raise its international profile (Science Museum, 2012).
    [Show full text]
  • The Higgs Boson and Big Science Sarah Eno, U. Maryland MASP Lectur
    How many physicists does it take to discover a new particle? The Higgs Boson and Big Science Sarah Eno, U. Maryland MASP lecture 29 April 08 Sarah Eno 1 4 July 2012 CERN Auditorium: announcement of a new particle 8 October 2013 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 2 Two Experiments CMS ATLAS 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 3 Each with a paper Discoveries are made by people, not by detectors. 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 4 CMS: Discovery courtesy of: 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 5 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 6 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 7 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 8 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 9 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 10 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 11 2892 authors from 168 institutions This is just the CMS paper. There is a similar list for ATLAS. 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 12 Outline • What is the Higgs boson? • How do we know that it was created in proton-proton collisions at the Large Hadron Collider • What do all those people actually do? 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 13 Particle Fever Assistant Professor Alberto Belloni 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 14 What is a Higgs Boson? 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 15 Before we talk about the Higgs, let’s think about forces Is it this? Particle physicists think of it as this: Force boson Matter: Quarks (protons) leptons (electron) matter Some more force bosons 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecture 16 Only four of them, each with a “boson” Electricity and Magnetism (QED) photon Strong Force (QCD) gluon Weak Force 1H + 1H ® 2 H + e+ +n 1 1 1 W&Z bosons 20 May 2014 Sarah Eno, MASP lecturehttp://www.dreamstime.com/powerplant-infrastructure-stock-photo-imagefree242420 17 Fourth is gravity, but since its effects are negligible when considering particle collisions at accelerators, I’ll ignore it.
    [Show full text]
  • CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and Beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community IMPRINT
    Vol. 16, No. 6, 2021 swiss-academies.ch CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community IMPRINT PUBLISHER Swiss Academy of Sciences (SCNAT) · Platform Mathematics, Astronomy and Physics (MAP) House of Academies · Laupenstrasse 7 · P.O. Box · 3001 Bern · Switzerland +41 31 306 93 25 · [email protected] · map.scnat.ch @scnatCH CONTACT Swiss Institute of Particle Physics (CHIPP) ETH Zürich · IPA · HPK E 26 · Otto-Stern-Weg 5 · 8093 Zürich Prof. Dr. Rainer Wallny · [email protected] · +41 44 633 40 09 · chipp.ch @CHIPP_news RECOMMENDED FORM OF CITATION Wallny R, Dissertori G, Durrer R, Isidori G, Müller K, Rivkin L, Seidel M, Sfyrla A, Weber M, Benelli A (2021) CHIPP Roadmap for Research and Infrastructure 2025–2028 and beyond by the Swiss Particle Physics Community Swiss Academies Reports 16 (6) SCNAT ROADMAPS COORDINATION Hans-Rudolf Ott (ETH Zürich) · Marc Türler (SCNAT) CHIPP ROADMAP EDITORIAL BOARD A. Benelli (secretary) · G. Dissertorib · R. Durrerd · G. Isidoric · K. Müllerc · L. Rivkina, g · M. Seidela, g · A. Sfyrlad R. Wallnyb (Chair) · M. Weberf CONTRIBUTING AUTHORS A. Antogninia, b · L. Baudisc · HP. Beckf · G. Bisona · A. Blondeld · C. Bottac · S. Braccinif · A. Bravard · L. Caminadaa, c F. Canellic · G. Colangelof · P. Crivellib · A. De Cosab · G. Dissertorib, M. Donegab · R. Durrerd · M. Gaberdielb · T. Gehrmannc T. Gollingd, C. Grabb · M. Grazzinic · M. Hildebrandta · M. Hoferichterf · B. Kilminstera · K. Kircha, b · A. Knechta · I. Kreslof B. Kruschee · G. Iacobuccid · G. Isidoric · M. Lainee · B. Laussa, M. Maggiored · F. Meiera · T. Montarulid · K. Müllerc A. Neronovd, 1 · A.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Fever Teacher Guide.Pdf
    Particle Fever A Teacher Guide for Middle and High School Alan Friedman, Arthur Eisenkraft, and Cary Sneider May, 2014 Discovery of the Higgs Boson. Courtesy of CERN.Retrieved from http://particlefever.com. What makes Particle Fever so appealing for classroom use is its focus on the people and the process of doing science, not just on explaining deep and complex ideas. !" " Table of Contents Overview .........................................................................................................................................3 The Overview offers suggestions for using Particle Fever in the classroom, connections to the Next Generation Science Standards, and describes the resources on the DVD. The Physicists in the Film .............................................................................................................8 These images and short descriptions of the major players in Particle Fever can be helpful reminders in discussing their contributions and comments. Theme 1. Big Science ...................................................................................................................10 A brief history of particle physics provides background information that can help your students understand the development of such a massive science endeavor as we see in the LHC, and several other “big science” efforts underway today. Theme 2. Being a Scientist Today...............................................................................................16 Theme 2 offers suggestions for helping students compare and
    [Show full text]
  • Physicist-Produced Documentary to Appear in New York Film Festival 27 September 2013
    Physicist-produced documentary to appear in New York Film Festival 27 September 2013 The temperature is heating up for Particle Fever, a palpable," Kaplan said. "You see, once you start, documentary produced by Johns Hopkins you can't stop. Particle physics is addictive, like University professor David Kaplan that highlights puzzles are to some people. These are just the the construction of one of the most audacious greatest puzzles of all time, literally." ventures in modern science. The film will be screened on Sept. 29 and Oct. 2 at the New York Kaplan, a theoretical physicist who studies dark Film Festival, one of the most prestigious in the matter, supersymmetry, and the properties of the country. Higgs boson, has been consumed with the LHC for about a decade. His passion for the project lead The New York Film Festival, formed in 1963 by the him to the film's director and film editor, two men Film Society of Lincoln Center, is considered an whose own passions are helping drive attention to essential launch pad for compelling independent the movie's central mystery. and mainstream movies to find distributors, generate industry buzz or capture the attention of Directed by Mark Levinson, a particle physicist movie audiences. The festival is in its 51st year turned filmmaker, the film is edited by Walter and will run from Friday to Oct. 13. Murch, a member of the Johns Hopkins Class of 1965. Murch is an esteemed Hollywood film editor For Particle Fever, the showing in New York is the and sound designer who has worked on some of second prestigious North American festival the most timeless and evocative movies in film booking this year.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Fever
    ABRAMORAMA and BOND360 Presents PARTICLE FEVER A documentary film by Mark Levinson and David Kaplan In theaters beginning March 5, 2014 Runtime: 99 minutes www.particlefever.com/ Press Materials Available At: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/i0eihi330kkzhx1/gEyeME8Cgy Press Contact: BOND Strategy and Influence / Brooke Medansky 212-354-2384 / [email protected] LOGLINE: Particle Fever follows the inside story of six brilliant scientists seeking to unravel the mysteries of the universe, documenting the successes and setbacks in the planet’s most significant and inspiring scientific breakthrough. SHORT SYNOPSIS: Imagine being able to watch as Edison turned on the first light bulb, or as Franklin received his first jolt of electricity. For the first time, a film gives audiences a front row seat to a significant and inspiring scientific breakthrough as it happens. Particle Fever follows six brilliant scientists during the launch of the Large Hadron Collider, marking the start-up of the biggest and most expensive experiment in the history of the planet, pushing the edge of human innovation. As they seek to unravel the mysteries of the universe, 10,000 scientists from over 100 countries joined forces in pursuit of a single goal: to recreate conditions that existed just moments after the Big Bang and find the Higgs boson, potentially explaining the origin of all matter. But our heroes confront an even bigger challenge: have we reached our limit in understanding why we exist? Directed by Mark Levinson, a physicist turned filmmaker, from the inspiration and initiative of producer David Kaplan and masterfully edited by Walter Murch (Apocalypse Now, The English Patient, The Godfather trilogy), Particle Fever is a celebration of discovery, revealing the very human stories behind this epic machine.
    [Show full text]
  • PECT0423-T.Pdf
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA CAMPUS FLORIANÓPOLIS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM EDUCAÇÃO CIENTÍFICA E TECNOLÓGICA Jonathan Thomas de Jesus Neto História e cultura de imagens de partículas elementares: condições de existência e circulação Florianópolis 2019 Jonathan Thomas de Jesus Neto História e cultura de imagens de partículas elementares: condições de existência e circulação Tese submetida ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina para a obtenção do título de doutor em Educação Científica e Tecnológica. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Henrique César da Silva. Florianópolis 2019 Ficha de identificação da obra elaborada pelo autor, através do Programa de Geração Automática da Biblioteca Universitária da UFSC. Neto, Jonathan Thomas de Jesus História e cultura de imagens de partículas elementares : condições de existência e circulação / Jonathan Thomas de Jesus Neto ; orientador, Henrique César da Silva, 2019. 203 p. Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências da Educação, Programa de Pós Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica, Florianópolis, 2019. Inclui referências. 1. Educação Científica e Tecnológica. 2. Imagens. 3. Enunciados. 4. Partículas elementares. 5. Cultura Material. I. Silva, Henrique César da. II. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação Científica e Tecnológica. III. Título. Jonathan Thomas de Jesus Neto História e cultura de imagens de partículas elementares: condições de existência e circulação O presente trabalho em nível de doutorado foi avaliado e aprovado por banca examinadora composta pelos seguintes membros: Profª. Dra. Andreia Guerra de Moraes Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica do Rio de Janeiro – Cefet Profª. Dra. Fernanda Ostermann Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Camp on ILC Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley, Kavli IPMU Tokyo) September 25, 2020
    New Physics Summer Camp on ILC Hitoshi Murayama (Berkeley, Kavli IPMU Tokyo) September 25, 2020 東京大学 2004.2.12 シンボルマーク+ロゴタイプ 新東大ブルー 基本形 漢字のみ 英語のみ Apology • I volunteered to give a talk but for some reason totally forgot about it. • I don’t have a dedicated assistant any more… • and yesterday was 32th anniversary • Thank you for rescheduling the talk for today! Disclaimer • I am trying to find new ways to exploit ILC for new physics searches. The content of the talk is somewhat sketchy and qualitative. You are warned that what I will discuss should not be taken literally. Your mileage may vary. Yes Higgs exists! ATLAS-CONF-2016-067 200 Data ATLAS Preliminary CMS-HIG-16-041 Let there be light -1 Background 180 s = 13 TeV, 13.3 fb Signal + Background -1 H→γγ, m = 125.09 GeV Preliminary 35.9 fb (13 TeV) H CMS What160 isSignal my weights / GeV S/B weighted sum of Data ∑ event categories 100 140 H(125) ggH VBF WH ZH ttH bbH tHjb tWH production mode? qq→ZZ, Zγ* 120 80 gg→ZZ, Zγ* ATLAS Simulation Preliminary H→ γγ s =13 TeV 100 Z+X Events / 4 GeV ttH leptonic 80 ttH hadronic H → ZZ has high resolution and large S/B. An 60 VH dileptons event categorization60 is performed based on the VH leptonic 40 VH MET different production modes (number of leptons, 40 VH hadronic tight jets, b-jets20 and MET) and ME based discriminants VH hadronic loose VBF tight sensitive0 to signal and background kinematics 20 10 VBF loose ggH fwd high-p Tt 5 ggH fwd low-p Tt 0 80 100 200 300 400 500 700 900 ggH central high-p 0 Tt 7 exclusive categories ggH central low-p weights - bkg m (GeV) Tt 4l 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 ∑ −for5 the main Higgs production modes Fraction of each signal process per category CMS110Preliminary 120 130 35.9140 fb-1 (13 TeV) 150 160 CMS Preliminary 35.9 fb-1 (13 TeV) ggH 4e untagged VH-hadr.
    [Show full text]
  • Centre Nodes Partner Institutions
    Centre nodes Monash node School of physics and astronomy Clayton Campus Monash University VIC 3800 T +61 3 9902 0328 E Sydney node School of physics, Building A28 Camperdown Campus The University of Sydney NSW 2006 T +61 2 9351 2539 E [email protected] Adelaide node 1st floor, Physics Building North Terrace Campus The University of Adelaide SA 5005 T +61 8 8313 3533 E [email protected] Melbourne node David Caro Building (Bld 192) Parkville Campus The Unviersity of Melbourne VIC 3010 T +61 3 9035 3873 E [email protected] Partner institutions CONTENTS CONTENTS 85 DEVELOPMENT 2 Acronyms and abbreviations 85 CoEPP Annual Scientific Workshop 5 ABOUT 88 Spring school on particle 5 About CoEPP physics and cosmology 6 Director’s report 90 Awards and recognition 8 Chair’s report 93 OUTREACH AND ENGAGEMENT 9 Report from the International Advisory Committee 93 High schools program 10 Structure and governance 94 International particle physics masterclass 15 PERSONNEL 96 Collision 15 Chief investigators 97 TEDxCERN@Monash and 16 Additional academic staff virtual visit to CMS 17 Honorary fellows and 98 Particle Fever showings at associates National Science Week 18 Partner investigators 99 Global Physics Photowalk 19 Postdoctoral researchers 101 PUBLICATIONS 22 Professional staff 101 Refereed journal articles 24 Students 104 ATLAS Collaboration 37 RESEARCH 110 Belle Collaboration 37 Overview 111 CDF Collaboration 38 Higgs program 111 Refereed conference proceedings 42 Higgs physics theory 113 Conference presentations 44 Searching
    [Show full text]