DOCSLIB.ORG

Awakening the Potential of Plasma Acceleration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Issue No. 35-36/2014 - Monday 25 August 2014 CERN Bulletin More articles at: http://bulletin.cern.ch AWAKENING THE POTENTIAL OF PLASMA ACCELERATION Civil engineering has begun for the new AWAKE experiment, which looks to push the SAFETY ON OUR ROADS boundaries of particle acceleration. This proof-of-principle experiment will harness the power It’s almost the end of August, and many of of wakefields generated by proton beams in plasma cells, producing accelerator gradients us are returning to CERN after a well-earned hundreds of times higher than those used in current RF cavities. rest. (Continued on page 2) In this issue NEWS Awakening the potential of plasma acceleration 1 Safety on our roads 1 LS1 Report: A highly choreographed ballet in the SPS 3 An iron hand in a velvet glove 4 Ready to don a white coat? 5 Discover POPSCIENCE on Researchers’ Night 6 First beam in Linac4 DTL 7 Behind the scenes of GS 7 Civil engineering works are currently ongoing at the AWAKE facility. Computer Security 8 Official news 9 Training 10 As one of CERN’s accelerator R&D Preparations are already underway, as CERN Take note 10 experiments, the AWAKE project is rather teams set out this summer to remake the Seminars 12 unique. Like all of CERN’s experiments, CNGS area into a home for AWAKE. “We have AWAKE is a collaborative endeavour with removed part of the proton beamline and institutes and organisations participating cleared the area upstream of the CNGS target around the world. “But unlike fixed-target to make way for the AWAKE installation, experiments, where the users take over including a laser and 10 metre plasma cell,” once CERN has delivered the facility, in explains Edda. “CNGS’s area downstream of AWAKE, the synchronised proton, electron and laser beams provided by CERN are an the target, however, has been left untouched. integral part of the experiment,” explains As it is radioactive, we constructed a new Edda Gschwendtner, CERN AWAKE project shielding wall in July so that the AWAKE leader. “So, of course, CERN’s involvement facility upstream can be a safe, supervised in the project goes well beyond providing working area for users.” infrastructure and services.” (Continued on page 2) Published by: CERN-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Tel. + 41 22 767 35 86 Printed by: CERN Printshop © 2014 CERN - ISSN: Printed version: 2077-950X Electronic version: 2077-9518 A word from the DG (Continued from page 1) LS1 REPORT: A HIGHLY CHOREOGRAPHED SAFETY ON OUR ROADS BALLET IN THE SPS For those with children, it’s time to prepare safe speeds. I wish we did not need to do should “promote and maintain a safe and them for school – and those of us who this, but it has been necessary as there healthy environment, following relevant drive often see signs to remind us that the have been many reports of unpleasant safety rules”. This is as true of driving at With only one short month left until beam, the SPS teams have been kept busy with powering schools are re-opening and that we should and dangerous, even life-threatening, CERN as of any other activity. So let’s show and operations tests. Alongside this demanding work, they have also successfully removed Meanwhile, elsewhere... take care. behaviour by drivers. some respect and keep our site safe. and replaced four key elements of the accelerator. At the LHC, the cooling of sector 1-2 is still Of course, we should all take care while I’d like to take this opportunity to remind Rolf Heuer in progress. The cooling of sector 5-6, which driving at any time, and this is just as true us all to drive with consideration and Since beginning their hardware-testing “Furthermore, they are big pieces of was next on the list, started at the end of at CERN as anywhere else. You may already respect for everyone who uses the CERN phase in early July, teams have been carrying equipment that take up the entire width of last week. The vacuum teams are currently have noticed that new “traffic-calming” site and shares the same thoroughfares – out Electrical Power Converter tests and a the tunnel. So coordinating which vehicles checking for any final leaks and carrying out measures have been set up near Restaurant pedestrians, cyclists and motorists alike. wide range of start-up tests for the various and teams were where and synchronising sealing tests in various sectors. 2, to encourage drivers to slow down to The CERN Code of Conduct states that we equipment groups. Slotted amongst this their movements was vital.” busy schedule of tests were the final checks At the same time, the CSCM tests (Copper of the accelerator’s magnets and beam Although the SPS teams are well-versed at Stabilizer Continuity Measurement) are in dump. “There are three main types of magnet replacing magnets (swapping as many as four progress in sector 8-1, and will eventually faults and we found we had one of each: an magnets in a two-day short technical stop), be carried out throughout the machine. This (Continued from page 1) electrical fault (short circuit) in the magnet, a replacing the beam dump proved a tougher week the first power tests will begin in sector water leak (as the magnets are water cooled) challenge. As the dump is radioactive, the 6-7, which will therefore be the first sector AWAKENING THE POTENTIAL and a vacuum chamber leak,” says David length of transport had to be kept as short ready for beam. Electrical validation tests are McFarlane, the SPS technical coordinator as possible and moving the dump from the in progress throughout the machine, along OF PLASMA ACCELERATION from the Engineering Department. “On top tunnel to the radiation storage area could with instrumentation tests, particularly on of that, there was a problem with the main not take place if it rained! With this in mind, the beam loss sensors. All of the collimators, beam dump, which meant it also had to be the Operations team created detailed plans the kicker magnets and the beam replaced. In the end, rather than stopping the for the move, providing hourly updates and instrumentation in the straight sections of The AWAKE facility will also feature a clean and their expertise for the AWAKE facility, in tests for each move, we decided to replace all back-up solutions in case of rain. “It was like a the LHC are now installed and under vacuum. room for the laser, a dedicated area for the addition to a number of klystron elements four elements in one go. “ highly choreographed ballet - everything was electron source and two new tunnels for two for the electron source,” says Allen. However, well-timed and perfectly in synchronisation,” At the SPS, hardware tests revealed a new beamlines: one small tunnel to hold the modifying the PHIN electron source to fit the From 10 August to 12 August, the three confirms McFarlane. damaged TIDVG (Target Internal Dump laser beam (which ionises the plasma and needs of AWAKE will require considerable magnets and beam dump were removed Vertical Graphite). It has now successfully seeds the wakefields); and a second, larger work from CERN staff and collaboration and replaced with spares in the SPS tunnel. Despite these replacements, the SPS is still been replaced and the machine is ready tunnel that will be home to the electron members. “The logistics for this move were complex, on schedule to take beam from the PS in for testing of the power converters to beamline (the “witness beam” accelerated by as not only are the magnets and beam early September. The accelerator will be recommence, in advance of the restart in the plasma). These new tunnels are currently The experiment will be conducted in two dumps extremely heavy, the chariot and operational in October, providing beams to October. being carved out for the facility (see image). phases, the first starting in 2016. “We first lifting equipment used to move the items the North Area. need to prove that the plasma cell is creating is a whopping ten tonnes,” says McFarlane. Katarina Anthony While these works are ongoing, the AWAKE accelerating wakefields, showing that the self team at the Max Planck Institute for Physics in modulation is working and can be controlled,” Munich is preparing to move both equipment concludes Edda. “Once we have studied this and know-how to CERN. “In Munich, we are phenomenon in detail, we will then use the working with a 3-metre prototype of the wakefields to accelerate the electron witness plasma cell,” says Allen Caldwell, AWAKE beam. This will take us up to LS2, by which Spokesperson. “Our focus is on the science: time we hope to have a good assessment learning the properties of the plasma cell as of the potential of proton-driven plasma well as possible before we start with the ‘real acceleration.” thing’. For example, we need to ensure that the temperature of the plasma in the cell is Katarina Anthony uniform and that the laser induces reliable wakefields.” “In addition to this, we are also addressing a number of hardware issues,” adds Patric Muggli, AWAKE Physics and Experiment Coordinator. “For example, we are creating valves that allow the laser, proton and electron beams to enter the plasma cell. These need to be extremely fast but also durable, opening and closing an unprecedented 40,000 times in their lifetime.” Although new technology is being created for AWAKE, the experiment also re-uses existing equipment from CNGS and other CERN facilities: “The CLIC/CTF3 collaboration has agreed to provide their PHIN electron source 2 CERN Bulletin Issue No.
Recommended publications
  • Muon Bundles As a Sign of Strangelets from the Universe

    Muon Bundles As a Sign of Strangelets from the Universe

    Draft version October 19, 2018 Typeset using LATEX default style in AASTeX61 MUON BUNDLES AS A SIGN OF STRANGELETS FROM THE UNIVERSE P. Kankiewicz,1 M. Rybczynski,´ 1 Z. W lodarczyk,1 and G. Wilk2 1Institute of Physics, Jan Kochanowski University, 25-406 Kielce, Poland 2National Centre for Nuclear Research, Department of Fundamental Research, 00-681 Warsaw, Poland Submitted to ApJ ABSTRACT Recently the CERN ALICE experiment, in its dedicated cosmic ray run, observed muon bundles of very high multiplicities, thereby confirming similar findings from the LEP era at CERN (in the CosmoLEP project). Originally it was argued that they apparently stem from the primary cosmic rays with a heavy masses. We propose an alternative possibility arguing that muonic bundles of highest multiplicity are produced by strangelets, hypothetical stable lumps of strange quark matter infiltrating our Universe. We also address the possibility of additionally deducing their directionality which could be of astrophysical interest. Significant evidence for anisotropy of arrival directions of the observed high multiplicity muonic bundles is found. Estimated directionality suggests their possible extragalactic provenance. Keywords: astroparticle physics: cosmic rays: reference systems arXiv:1612.04749v2 [hep-ph] 17 Mar 2017 Corresponding author: M. Rybczy´nski [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] 2 Kankiewicz et al. 1. INTRODUCTION Cosmic ray physics is our unique source of information on events in the energy range which will never be accessible in Earth-bound experiments Dar & De Rujula(2008); Letessier-Selvon & Stanev(2011). This is why one of the most important aspects of their investigation is the understanding of the primary cosmic ray (CR) flux and its composition.
  • Trigger and Data Acquisition

    Trigger and Data Acquisition

    Trigger and data acquisition N. Ellis CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract The lectures address some of the issues of triggering and data acquisition in large high-energy physics experiments. Emphasis is placed on hadron-collider experiments that present a particularly challenging environment for event se- lection and data collection. However, the lectures also explain how T/DAQ systems have evolved over the years to meet new challenges. Some examples are given from early experience with LHC T/DAQ systems during the 2008 single-beam operations. 1 Introduction These lectures concentrate on experiments at high-energy particle colliders, especially the general- purpose experiments at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [1]. These experiments represent a very chal- lenging case that illustrates well the problems that have to be addressed in state-of-the-art high-energy physics (HEP) trigger and data-acquisition (T/DAQ) systems. This is also the area in which the author is working (on the trigger for the ATLAS experiment at LHC) and so is the example that he knows best. However, the lectures start with a more general discussion, building up to some examples from LEP [2] that had complementary challenges to those of the LHC. The LEP examples are a good reference point to see how HEP T/DAQ systems have evolved in the last few years. Students at this school come from various backgrounds — phenomenology, experimental data analysis in running experiments, and preparing for future experiments (including working on T/DAQ systems in some cases). These lectures try to strike a balance between making the presentation accessi- ble to all, and going into some details for those already familiar with T/DAQ systems.
  • The Higgs Boson!

    The Higgs Boson!

    MEET THE TIME MAGAZINE PARTICLE OF THE YEAR: THE HIGGS BOSON! Saptaparna Bhattacharya July 11th - 22nd, 2016 Lets start at the beginning! http://poy.time.com/2012/12/19/the-higgs-boson-particle-of-the-year/ Introduction • I am Saptaparna Bhattacharya, a post-doctoral scholar in the department of Physics and Astronomy at Northwestern University in Chicago. • My research is based on the data from the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. • I have worked on the first published result that uses the Higgs boson as a probe for New Physics. • My interest lies in various models of New Physics, ranging from SuperSymmetry to exploring the possibility of finding microscopic black holes. • I am also interested in exploring interesting techniques for data analysis. But, enough about me, where are you guys from? Current Enrollment We are a class of 17 students! Let me quickly check to see if you are all here! What we did last summer! Di-photon invariant mass h_InvariantMass_PhPh Higgs to ZZ invariant mass h_InvariantMass_HZZ Entries 85893 Entries 13235 30000 Mean 125.9 Mean 124.2 RMS 2.636 RMS 3.147 5000 25000 Events/2.0 GeV Events/2.0 GeV 20000 4000 Higgs boson mass distribution Higgs boson mass distribution 15000 3000 10000 2000 5000 1000 0 0 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 m [GeV] m [GeV] γγ µ µ µ µ Di-muon invariant mass h_InvariantMass_MuMu Tranverse Mass with Muons Entries 37122 h_TransverseMass_Mu Mean 90.66 Entries 37791 RMS 4.506 5000 4000 Mean 65.9 RMS 15.36 3500 4000 Events/GeV Events/1.0 GeV 3000 Z boson mass distribution 3000 2500 W boson transverse 2000 mass distribution 2000 1500 1000 1000 500 0 0 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 m [GeV] mµµ [GeV] T Outline • The course is roughly structured into two parts: • Laying down the fundamentals.
  • A BOINC-Based Volunteer Computing Infrastructure for Physics Studies At

    A BOINC-Based Volunteer Computing Infrastructure for Physics Studies At

    Open Eng. 2017; 7:379–393 Research article Javier Barranco, Yunhai Cai, David Cameron, Matthew Crouch, Riccardo De Maria, Laurence Field, Massimo Giovannozzi*, Pascal Hermes, Nils Høimyr, Dobrin Kaltchev, Nikos Karastathis, Cinzia Luzzi, Ewen Maclean, Eric McIntosh, Alessio Mereghetti, James Molson, Yuri Nosochkov, Tatiana Pieloni, Ivan D. Reid, Lenny Rivkin, Ben Segal, Kyrre Sjobak, Peter Skands, Claudia Tambasco, Frederik Van der Veken, and Igor Zacharov LHC@Home: a BOINC-based volunteer computing infrastructure for physics studies at CERN https://doi.org/10.1515/eng-2017-0042 Received October 6, 2017; accepted November 28, 2017 1 Introduction Abstract: The LHC@Home BOINC project has provided This paper addresses the use of volunteer computing at computing capacity for numerical simulations to re- CERN, and its integration with Grid infrastructure and ap- searchers at CERN since 2004, and has since 2011 been plications in High Energy Physics (HEP). The motivation expanded with a wider range of applications. The tradi- for bringing LHC computing under the Berkeley Open In- tional CERN accelerator physics simulation code SixTrack frastructure for Network Computing (BOINC) [1] is that enjoys continuing volunteers support, and thanks to vir- available computing resources at CERN and in the HEP tualisation a number of applications from the LHC ex- community are not sucient to cover the needs for nu- periment collaborations and particle theory groups have merical simulation capacity. Today, active BOINC projects joined the consolidated LHC@Home BOINC project. This together harness about 7.5 Petaops of computing power, paper addresses the challenges related to traditional and covering a wide range of physical application, and also virtualized applications in the BOINC environment, and particle physics communities can benet from these re- how volunteer computing has been integrated into the sources of donated simulation capacity.
  • Cosmic-Ray Studies with Experimental Apparatus at LHC

    Cosmic-Ray Studies with Experimental Apparatus at LHC

    S S symmetry Article Cosmic-Ray Studies with Experimental Apparatus at LHC Emma González Hernández 1, Juan Carlos Arteaga 2, Arturo Fernández Tellez 1 and Mario Rodríguez-Cahuantzi 1,* 1 Facultad de Ciencias Físico Matemáticas, Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de Puebla, Av. San Claudio y 18 Sur, Edif. EMA3-231, Ciudad Universitaria, 72570 Puebla, Mexico; [email protected] (E.G.H.); [email protected] (A.F.T.) 2 Instituto de Física y Matemáticas, Universidad Michoacana, 58040 Morelia, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 2 October 2020; Published: 15 October 2020 Abstract: The study of cosmic rays with underground accelerator experiments started with the LEP detectors at CERN. ALEPH, DELPHI and L3 studied some properties of atmospheric muons such as their multiplicity and momentum. In recent years, an extension and improvement of such studies has been carried out by ALICE and CMS experiments. Along with the LHC high luminosity program some experimental setups have been proposed to increase the potential discovery of LHC. An example is the MAssive Timing Hodoscope for Ultra-Stable neutraL pArticles detector (MATHUSLA) designed for searching of Ultra Stable Neutral Particles, predicted by extensions of the Standard Model such as supersymmetric models, which is planned to be a surface detector placed 100 meters above ATLAS or CMS experiments. Hence, MATHUSLA can be suitable as a cosmic ray detector. In this manuscript the main results regarding cosmic ray studies with LHC experimental underground apparatus are summarized. The potential of future MATHUSLA proposal is also discussed. Keywords: cosmic ray physics at CERN; atmospheric muons; trigger detectors; muon bundles 1.
  • The Second Level Trigger and Dimuon Results

    The Second Level Trigger and Dimuon Results

    ••~ Muonsin UA1; the second level trigger and dimuon results BATS -Data Functional signals /Data )mm; subset AppleTalk. S\S\ IBM 3090 •hard disk keyboard/display • reset button A. L. van Dijk Muons inUAl; the second level trigger and dimuon results ACADEMISCH PROEFSCHRIFT ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, op gezag van de Rector Magnificus Prof. Dr. P. W. M. de Meijer, in het openbaar te verdedigen in de Aula der Universiteit (Oude Lutherse Kerk, ingang Singel 411, hoek Spui) op dinsdag 26 februari 1991 te 15:00 uur. door Adriaan Louis van Dijk geboren te Amsterdam Promotor: Prof. Dr. J. J. Engelen Co-Promotor: Dr. K. Bos The work described in this thesis is part of the research program of the 'Nationaal Instituut voor Kernfysica en Hoge Energie Fysica (NIKHEFH)'. The author was financially supported by the 'Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM)'. Contents I Introduction 1 1.1 Proton-ontlproton physics, motivation 1 1.2 The CERN proton-antiprolon collider 2 1.3 Collider performance and physics achievements 3 1.4 Jets, muons, heavy flavours and flavour mixing S 1.5 Outline of this thesis 7 II TheUAl Experiment 8 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 The UA1 coordinate system 10 2.3 Central detector (CD) 11 2.4 The Hadronic Calorimeter 14 2.5 Muon detection system IS 2.6 Triggering and daia acquisition (1987-1990) 18 III Data Acquisition and Triggers 20 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Daia acquisition 21 3.2.2 The Event Building 23 3.2.3 Hardware and standards 23 3.2.4 Software 24 3.2.5 Ergonomics 24 3.3
  • The Cell Geometry Is Adapted to the Manufacturing Process. One Side Of

    The Cell Geometry Is Adapted to the Manufacturing Process. One Side Of

    R&D for the Future 443 The cell geometry is adapted to the manufacturing process. One side of the cell carries all the features required for the RF, whereas the other side is flat for bonding (Fig. 12.11). The cells are diamond machined, joined by diffusion bonding under hydrogen at about 1000°C and vacuum baked at 650°C. With exacting machining tolerances, typically in the 1 µm range, the tuning of the final structure is avoided. A number of test facilities is in operation worldwide including those at CERN which houses the only facility modelling the two-beam scheme in addition to a number of test stands powered by klystrons for high turn-around of testing structure variants. Nominal accelerating gradients of 100 MV/m have been achieved in the accelerating structures under development in a worldwide collaboration with the required low break-down rate while the PETSs have been tested at the nominal output power of 150 MW. However, more variants of these two structures have to be built and examined to address HOM damping, lifetime, breakdown statistics, industrial-scale fabrication, and better understanding of the break-down mechanisms. The Next Energy Frontier e+e− Collider: Innovation in Detectors Lucie Linssen Throughout the history of particle physics, both protons and electrons, with their respective antiparticles, have been used extensively for high energy colliders [Box 4.1]. The merits and difficulties of physics research with high luminosity proton–proton colliders are briefly described in the Box 8.3. Electrons, in contrast to protons, are genuine elementary particles. Apart from initial-state radiation and beamstrahlung effects (see below), they provide very good knowledge of the initial state of the collision.
  • Learning Physics from ALEPH Events

    Learning Physics from ALEPH Events

    Learning Physics from ALEPH Events This document is an adaptation of the Web pages created by Joe Rothberg and Henri Videau at CERN. These pages can be found at http://aleph.web.cern.ch/aleph/educ/Welcome.html. Last updated: PTD, 5/Oct/2007 1 Introduction The aim of the following project is to provide some means for you to improve your knowledge of particle physics by studying some real data recently collected in the ALEPH experiment. To make it possible we provide some description of the experiment, of its detector and of some physics topics. It will help greatly if you have a copy of a recent particle physics text book to help you with any new concepts. A suggested text is “Introduction to High Energy Physics” by D.H.Perkins. You will need to access the world wide web throughout this project. Various URL’s (internet addresses) will be provided where you can find additional information on specific points. It is highly recommended that you take advantage of this extra information. You will also need access to your Windows account on the lab PC’s, so make sure you have your username validated in advance for this. 2 The Project The project is intended to require three days (21 hours) of study and work, with an additional 6 hours to write up. 1. On day one you should read the sections on “The LEP Collider”, “The ALEPH Exper- iment” and on “Starting with PAW”. After these sections are understood, there are a set of questions to be answered and the answers are to be included in your final report.
  • Studies of Jet Energy Corrections at the CMS Experiment and Their Automation

    Studies of Jet Energy Corrections at the CMS Experiment and Their Automation

    Master’s thesis Theoretical and Computational Methods Studies of jet energy corrections at the CMS experiment and their automation Adelina Lintuluoto February 2021 Supervisor: Asst. prof. Mikko Voutilainen Advisor: Dr. Clemens Lange Examiners: Asst. prof. Mikko Voutilainen Dr. Kati Lassila-Perini UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS PB 64 (Gustaf Hällströms gata 2a) 00014 Helsingfors universitet Tiedekunta – Fakultet – Faculty Koulutusohjelma – Utbildningsprogram – Degree programme Faculty of Science Master’s programme Opintosuunta – Studieinrikting – Study track Theoretical and computational methods Tekijä – Författare – Author Adelina Lintuluoto Työn nimi – Arbetets titel – Title Studies of jet energy corrections at the CMS experiment and their automation Työn laji – Arbetets art – Level Aika – Datum – Month and year Sivumäärä – Sidoantal – Number of pages Master’s thesis February 2021 69 Tiivistelmä – Referat – Abstract At the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) experiment at CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), the building blocks of the Universe are investigated by analysing the observed final-state particles resulting from high-energy proton-proton collisions. However, direct detection of final-state quarks and gluons is not possible due to a phenomenon known as colour confinement. Instead, event properties with a close correspondence with their distributions are studied. These event properties are known as jets. Jets are central to particle physics analysis and our understanding of them, and hence of our Universe, is dependent upon our ability to accurately measure their energy. Unfortunately, current detector technology is imprecise, necessitating downstream correction of measurement discrepancies. To achieve this, the CMS experiment employs a sequential multi-step jet calibration process. The process is performed several times per year, and more often during periods of data collection.
  • Outreach Activities, Web, Radio&TV, Non-Specialized Conferences And

    Outreach Activities, Web, Radio&TV, Non-Specialized Conferences And

    1 Laboratoire de Physique des Hautes Energies (LPHE) Outreach activities, web, radio&TV, non-specialized conferences and publications April 2009 { March 2016 We list here activities aiming at making our research known to less specialized audiences, or more generally to the public at large. April 2015 { March 2016 1. C. Fitzpatrick, guide for visit at CERN of students from Campbell College Belfast, March 19, 2016. 2. O. Schneider, visit organized at CERN (at LHCb, CAST, and LHC magnets) for 60 Bachelor students of EPFL, November 17, 2015. 3. I. Komarov, \On the irreversibility of time and Einstein's theory", online lecture for children in the framework of the \Scientists to kids" project, Experimentarium Museum, Moscow, Russia, October 24, 2015. 4. CERN Courier: \LHCb improves trigger in Run 2", September 25, 2015. 5. O. Schneider, participation in an interdisciplinary podium discussion \Le boson de Higgs { architecte de l'Univers ?" after a public screening of the movie \Particle Fever" (flyer), Lyc´ee-Coll`egedes Creusets, Sion, Switzerland, September 25, 2015. 6. LHCb public web site: \First LHC run2 physics results: measurement of J= production cross- sections in pp collisions at 13 TeV", July 24, 2015. 7. EPFL news: \EPFL contributes to breakthrough experiment at CERN"(\L'EPFL contribue `aune d´ecouverte majeure au CERN", May 21, 2015. 8. EPFL news: \Tatsuya Nakada awarded Honorary Doctorate from University of Zurich"(\Tatsuya Nakada honor´epar l'Universit´ede Zurich"), May 4, 2015. 9. V. Battista, \LHCb: tra bellezza e asimmetrie", science popularization article published in \Quaderni di scienza e scienziati molisani", 2015. April 2014 { March 2015 1.
  • Speed of Light and Rates of Clocks in the Space Generation Model of Gravitation, Part 1

    Speed of Light and Rates of Clocks in the Space Generation Model of Gravitation, Part 1

    GravitationLab.com Speed of Light and Rates of Clocks in the Space Generation Model of Gravitation, Part 1 1 R. BENISH( ) (1) Eugene, Oregon, USA, [email protected] Abstract. — General Relativity’s Schwarzschild solution describes a spherically symmetric gravi- tational field as an utterly static thing. The Space Generation Model (SGM) describes it as an absolutely moving thing. The SGM nevertheless agrees equally well with observations made in the fields of the Earth and Sun, because it predicts almost ex- actly the same spacetime curvature. This success of the SGM motivates deepening the context—especially with regard to the fundamental concepts of motion. The roots of Einstein’s relativity theories thus receive critical examination. A particularly illumi- nating and widely applicable example is that of uniform rotation, which was used to build General Relativity (GR). Comparing Einstein’s logic to that of the SGM, the most significant difference concerns the interpretation of the readings of accelerom- eters and the rates of clocks. Where Einstein infers relativity of motion and space- time symmetry, it is argued to be more logical to infer absoluteness of motion and spacetime asymmetry. This approach leads to reassessments of the essential nature of matter, time, and the dimensionality of space, which lead in turn to some novel cos- mological consequences. Special emphasis is given to the model’s deviations from standard predictions inside matter, which have never been tested, but could be tested by conducting a simple experiment. PACS 04.80.Cc – Experimental tests of gravitational theories. 1. – Introduction; Intended Audience Beware ye, all those bold of spirit who want to suggest new ideas.
  • Curating the Collider: Using Place to Engage Museum Visitors with Particle Physics

    Curating the Collider: Using Place to Engage Museum Visitors with Particle Physics

    Science Museum Group Journal Curating the collider: using place to engage museum visitors with particle physics Journal ISSN number: 2054-5770 This article was written by Alison Boyle, Harry Cliff 10-09-2014 Cite as 10.15180; 140207 Research Curating the collider: using place to engage museum visitors with particle physics Published in Autumn 2014, Issue 02 Article DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/140207 Abstract CERN’s Large Hadron Collider, the world’s largest particle physics facility, provides museological opportunities and challenges. Visitor interest in cutting-edge physics, with its high media profile, is tempered by anxiety about understanding complex content. The topic does not readily lend itself to traditional museum showcase-dominated displays: the technology of modern particle physics is overwhelmingly large, while the phenomena under investigation are invisible. For Collider, a major temporary exhibition, the Science Museum adopted a ‘visit to CERN’ approach, recreating several of the laboratory’s spaces. We explore the effectiveness of this approach, at a time when historical studies of scientific laboratories and museum reconstructions of spaces are subject to renewed interest. Component DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15180/140207/001 Keywords Science Museum, Collider, Large Hadron Collider, CERN, particle physics, place, space, re-creation, room set, museum Introduction Collider: step inside the world’s greatest experiment ran at the Science Museum from November 2013–May 2014 and is touring internationally until 2017. The exhibition covers the work of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN, the world’s largest particle physics facility. Strategically, the subject matter had obvious appeal for the Science Museum, with its long term ambitions to tackle complex scientific topics, attract more adult visitors, and raise its international profile (Science Museum, 2012).