2.8 Primary and Secondary Sources

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.8 Primary and Secondary Sources 2.8 Primary and Secondary Sources e have compared the way a historian works to the way a detective SOURCE A works. The main difference between detectives and historians is The temple of Abu Simbel, built theW evidence they work with. Detectives look for witnesses and question by pharaoh Ramesses II between them. In history this is not often possible. You cannot talk to a witness of about 1285 BC and 1265 BC. William of Orange’s assassination in 1584 – they are all dead. Historians have to collect their information from clues that survive. They call these clues sources, and there are two main types. Primary sources come from the time the historian is studying. Some primary sources for the First World War would be: letters and diaries written by soldiers, their uniforms and their weapons. Even if a nurse in a hospital in France during the war wrote her memories of the war much later, they are still a primary source. Secondary sources do not come directly from the events they discuss. They are based on other sources. Books about the First World War by historians, or school textbooks about the First World War, are examples of secondary sources. Not all sources are written. Buildings, archaeological remains, paintings and objects are all valuable sources. There is more to knowing the difference between a primary and secondary source than knowing when it was made. Look at Source A. • It is a photograph of the Egyptian temple of Abu Simbel, taken in 2002. SOURCE B • In the 1960s the Egyptian government decided to build the Aswan High Dam to control the flooding of the Nile. The dam would create a A book first published in 1986. lake, Lake Nasser. Many Ancient Egyptian sites would be flooded. So the government moved some important monuments to places above the water level of Lake Nasser. Between 1964 and 1968 the temple of Abu Simbel was cut into thousands of stone blocks and moved 65m higher and 180m back from the old river. They built an artificial hill to set the temple in. So, in a way, Source A was ‘made’ in either 2002 (when the photo was taken) or 1968 (when the temple was moved). But the photograph is just a way of looking at the building: the building is the source. The rebuilt temple is not a copy of the original. It is the original – moved, and rebuilt exactly as it was. When we look at Source A, we are looking at a temple built by Ramesses II, finished about 1265 bc. It is a primary source for studying Ancient Egypt. It is also a primary source for a historian studying twentieth-century engineering. This is important. You have to know what you are studying before you can decide if a source is primary or secondary. 40 DutchHistoryUnit2.indd 40 8/6/07 12:41:39 SOURCE C SOURCE D A book first published in 1969. The ‘Bent’ Pyramid of Sneferu, so called because it changes angles about halfway up. Built some time between 2613 BC-2589 BC. SOURCE F An artist’s reconstruction from a school textbook. This is the ceremony called ‘the opening of the mouth’. It SOURCE E was performed on a mummy in its case outside the chapel by the tomb A school book first published in before burial. 2002. SOURCE E A painting from the tomb of Ramose, Governor of Thebes in about 1336 BC. Servants carry things into his tomb. 41 DutchHistoryUnit2.indd 41 8/6/07 12:41:54 2.9 The Pyramids n 2648 bc, the pharaoh Djoser was buried in a new spectacular kind Which is the of tomb, a pyramid. The pyramid was at Saqqara, near the capital city ofI Memphis (see map on page 26). It had been rising steadily from the tallest Giza ground for about 40 years. It was built in a series of ‘steps’. Soon, architects had worked out how to build smooth-sided pyramids. Until 1525 bc, pyramid? all pharaohs were buried in pyramids. Family members and important The tallest pyramid at Giza officials were buried nearby, and there were chapels to leave offerings to the is not, in fact, the pyramid pharaohs, too. The most powerful pharaohs had huge stone pyramids. The that looks the tallest. The least powerful pharaohs had small, mud brick pyramids, most of which have tallest pyramid is the one at not survived to today. the back is Source B. It was How were they built? built first, for the pharaoh First, priests studied the stars and chose a good place to build the pyramid. Khufu. The pyramid that looks the tallest was built Then they made sure the ground was perfectly flat. Stone had to be cut in for Khufu’s son, Khafre. He quarries and sailed up as close to the pyramid site as possible, often during had his pyramid built on the inundation. The workers moved the stones on sledges, dragged by slightly higher ground, so animals. They shaped the stones at the pyramid site with copper tools. They that it looked taller. built up the pyramid layer by layer. The workers used an earth ramp to work from once they were above ground level. The outside stones were limestone and were polished until they shone. Shining gold In most pyramids the pharaoh was buried underground. The pyramid itself The tops of the pyramids was a solid block on the top. The limestone blocks of stone on the outside were often covered with a were so perfectly carved that they fitted together exactly. Inside, the stones layer of gold. This shone were more roughly joined together. In places, there were large gaps in the brightly in the sun. It has led stones that were filled with sand or chipped stone. some historians to suggest that the shape of the pyramid is a symbol of the rays of the sun. We cannot know for sure. SOURCE A The Step Pyramid of King Djoser (behind) and the Pyramid of Userkaf (2487 BC). Userkaf ’s pyramid had its outer covering of stones taken away to be re- used. The inner core of the pyramid was not as well built as the outside. 42 DutchHistoryUnit2.indd 42 8/6/07 12:42:02 Pyramid facts • The biggest pyramid is the one built for Khufu • The most unusual pyramid is the ‘bent’ at Giza. It is 146 m high. pyramid, at Dahshur. It was one of two built for • It took about 20 years to build. the Old Kingdom pharaoh Sneferu. This was • The base of Khufu’s pyramid covered about an early smooth-sided pyramid. The builders 5.25 hectares (about 200 tennis courts joined miscalculated the angle they needed to build together). at. After about ten years they realised that the • It is an almost perfect square, and the ground sides were too steep. They were building at an is perfectly level. angle of just over 54°. If they kept on at the • Khufu’s pyramid was made from 2.3 million same angle, the pyramid would collapse. Rather stone blocks. The average weight of a block than waste all their years of work, the builders was 2.5 tons. There were some much bigger simply changed the angle to just over 43°. This blocks. Some weighed 15 tons. worked. The pyramid is still standing. SOURCE B The pyramids at Giza. The nearest is Menkaura (2503 BC), then Khafra (2532 BC) then Khufu (2566 BC). 43 DutchHistoryUnit2.indd 43 8/6/07 12:42:05 2.10 The Valley of the Kings yramids were hard to get into, but still grave with any grave goods left was that of Tutankhamun. robbers succeeded. The valuable grave goods The tombs in the Valley of the Kings area were built madeP it worth the dangers involved. So from 1550 for the most important people, so they are large bc, the pharaohs used a new burial system: tombs and beautifully decorated. A special village, Deir dug into the rocky cliffs in the Valley of the Kings. el-Medina (often just called Deir) was built for Their families were buried in the next valley, the the people who worked on the tombs. Deir is one Valley of the Queens. Important officials were buried of the few ancient Egyptian villages we can study. in the hill between these valleys. Most villages were built and re-built several times. However, Deir was left alone because it was not on All the tombs were beautifully painted. The paintings farmland by the River Nile. It was in the desert, near show the tomb owner with the gods, or living a the tombs. Two chief workmen organised workers perfect life in the Fields of Iaru. They were also filled to dig out, carve and decorate the tombs. They with beautiful, valuable grave goods too. Soldiers also organised the workers who made all the grave guarded the area, but it was hard to guard. Most goods. The tomb painters worked in the dark, deep tombs were robbed in ancient times. Only the underground. How did they manage to produce such paintings are still there. The only pharaoh’s tomb beautiful, detailed paintings? Part of the tomb of an official called Sennefer, built on the hill overlooking the Valley of the Kings. SOURCE A 44 DutchHistoryUnit2.indd 44 8/6/07 12:42:38 SOURCE B A modern artist’s reconstruction of tomb painters at work. SOURCE C This unfinished wall painting from the Tomb of Horemheb shows how the painters worked. The first sketches are in red.
Recommended publications
  • Astronomy, Topography and Dynastic History in the Age of the Pyramids
    Astronomy, topography and dynastic history in the Age of the Pyramids. Giulio Magli Faculty of Civil Architecture - Politecnico di Milano Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy It is known since the 19 century that in the layout of the pyramid field of the pharaohs of the 4 th Egyptian dynasty at Giza, a “main axis” exists. Indeed, the south-east corners of these monuments align towards the site of the temple of Heliopolis, which was plainly visible in ancient times. It was later discovered that a similar situation occurs in the main pyramid field of the subsequent dynasty at Abu Sir. Here, the north-west corners of three chronologically successive pyramids again voluntarily align towards Heliopolis. However, the temple was in this case not visible, due to the rock outcrop- today occupied by the Cairo citadel - which blocks the view. In the present paper, a multi-disciplinary approach based on historical, topographical and archaeoastronomical analysis is developed in an attempt at understanding this peculiar feature, which governed from the very beginning the planning of such wonderful monuments. A general pattern actually arises, which appears to have inspired the choice of the sites and the disposition on the ground of almost all the funerary complexes of the kings during the Old Kingdom. 1. Introduction An interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of Giza and Abu Sir: the presence of a “main axis” directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile. These axes are connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaoh which probably started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometry and Perspective in the Landscape of the Saqqara Pyramids
    GEOMETRY AND PERSPECTIVE IN THE LANDSCAPE OF THE SAQQARA PYRAMIDS MAGLI Giulio, (I) Abstract. A series of peculiar, visual alignments between the pyramids of the pharaohs of the 4th , the 5th and the 6th Egyptian dynasties exists. These alignments governed from the very beginning the planning of the funerary monuments of successive kings and, in some cases, led to establish building sites in quite inconvenient locations from the technical viewpoint. Explaining the topography of these monuments means therefore also investigating on their symbolic motivations: religion, power, dynastic lineage and social context, as well as getting insights on the skills of the ancient architects in astronomy and geometry. In the present paper we focus on the relationships between the Old Kingdom pyramids at Saqqara. Key words. Ancient astronomy. Ancient and sacred geometry. Egyptian pyramids. Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 01A16, 51-03. 1 Introduction th It is known since the 19 century that an interesting feature exists in the layouts of the pyramids of th the 4 dynasty at Giza: the presence of a “main axis” connecting the south-east corners of the three main monuments and directed to the area where the ancient temple of the sun of Heliopolis once stood, on the opposite bank of the Nile [1,2,3]. This line is connected with a process of “solarisation” of the pharaohs which started with Khufu, the builder of the Great Pyramid, and th lasted up Menkaure, the builder of the third Giza pyramid [4,5]. The kings of the 5 dynasty moved - in spite of the presence of several favorable places to the immediate south of Giza - some 7 Kms apart on the plateau of Abusir.
    [Show full text]
  • Palarch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 7(6), 2010
    Miatello, Khufu’s Grand Gallery PalArch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 7(6) (2010) Examining thE grand gallEry in thE Pyramid of Khufu and its fEaturEs Luca Miatello* *Via garibaldi 18 22070 albiolo, Co, italy [email protected] Miatello, Luca. 2010. Examining the grand gallery in the Pyramid of Khufu and its features. – Palarch’s Journal of archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology 7(6) (2010), 1-36. issn 1567-214x. 36 pages + 14 figures, 3 tables (incl.a ppendix). Keywords: old Kingdom architecture, royal funerary complexes, pyramid of Khufu, grand gallery, architecture and decoration programme AbstrAct the explanation of the symmetrical features on the west and east sides of the grand gal- lery in the pyramid of Khufu has always been an intricate puzzle for researchers. the existence of such peculiar features is generally related to the function of parking the granite plugs, but only three or four granite blocks were presumably used to plug the ascending corridor, while a much larger number of slots and niches are found in the gal- lery. Previous interpretations of niches, slots, cuttings and grooves are unsatisfactory, and the present investigation focuses on important, formerly neglected aspects. the analysis of numerical patterns in the design of the grand gallery provides crucial evidence, and a new interpretation of the features in the gallery is, therefore, proposed, by considering the numerous variables implied in the problem. the grand gallery in the pyramid of Khufu, still today block the ascending corridor. how- with its astonishing corbelled ceiling made of ever, previous interpretations of the functions huge limestone blocks, has no parallel in in- of the peculiar features on the west and east ternal passages of pyramid tombs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dry Moat Surrounding the Step Pyramid Complex
    THE DRY MOAT SURROUNDING THE STEP PYRAMID COMPLEX AT SAQQARA THE GREAT RECTANGULAR MONUMENTS OF MIDDLE SAQQARA THE STEP PYRAMID COMPLEX WAS BUILT BY IMHOTEP AND WAS RESTORED BY JEAN-PHILIPPE LAUER THE RECTANGULAR MONUMENTS AT ABYDOS WERE SURROUNDED BY DOUBLE WALLS OR TOMBS OF COURTIERS TOMBS OF COURTIERS ALSO SURROUNDED THE ROYAL TOMBS AT ABYDOS *** THE TOMB OF DEN THE GREAT RECTANGULAR MONUMENTS AT MIDDLE SAQQARA ARE NOT SURROUNDED BY EITHER DOUBLE WALLS OR TOMBS OF COURTIERS THE DISCOVERY OF THE DRY MOAT WITH THE HELP OF AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS OF 1924 AND 1950 THE DISCOVERY WAS ANNOUNCED AT THE 4TH CONGRESS OF EGYPTOLOGISTS MUNICH 1985 AND PUBLISHED LONDON 1988 AND VIENNA 2006 THE PLAN OF THE DRY MOAT SHOWS CHANNELS WHICH OVERLAP ON THE SOUTH SIDE THE HIEROGLYPHS BATTLMENTED ENCLOSURE, REED SHELTER IN THE FIELDS AND ON NARMER’S MACE HEAD; THE ENCLOSURE HAS OVERLAPPING WALLS GUNTER DREYER DISCOVERED THAT AT THE ROYAL TOMBS OF ABYDOS AN EMBANKMENT WALL WHICH SURROUNDED THE LOWER TUMULUS WAS OVERLAPPING ON ONE SIDE THE SOUTHERN OVERLAPING WALLS AT GISR EL MODIR THE ELBOW IN THE SOUTH TEMENOS WALL OF THE PYRAMID OF KHAFRA TO APPROACH THE DRY MOAT WE HAVE TO CONSIDER THE ROYAL TOMBS OF THE SECOND DYNASTY, THE PYRAMID OF UNAS, ITS CAUSEWAY AND BOAT PITS THE POSITION OF THE PYRAMID OF UNAS AT MIDDLE SAQQARA THE PYRAMID OF UNAS WAS BUILT OVER AN UNEXCAVATED PIT AND THE GALLERIES OF HOTEPSEKHEMWY THE UNEXCAVATED PIT EXTENDING UNDER THE PYRAMID OF UNAS THE PYRAMID OF UNAS AND THE UPPER TEMPLE OVER THE TOMB OF HOTEPSEKHEMWY THE LAYOUT OF THE ROYAL
    [Show full text]
  • Tessa Dickinson a Landscape and Materials-Based Approach to Royal Mortuary Architecture in Early Third Millennium BC Egypt Volum
    Tessa Dickinson A Landscape and Materials-based Approach to Royal Mortuary Architecture in Early Third Millennium BC Egypt Volume 1: Text Institute of Archaeology University College London 2014 Thesis submitted to University College London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Disclaimer I, Tessa Dickinson, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Tessa Dickinson 2 Abstract This dissertation examines the role that the building of royal mortuary complexes (RMC hereafter) played in the consolidation of the Egyptian state between the reigns of kings Khasekhemwy and Shepseskaf, c. 2,700-2,500 BC. The theoretical basis for this research is inspired by cross-cultural studies that demonstrate (a) that monuments are not only the after-effect of a centralised state system, but may themselves be integrative strategies that contribute more directly to a state’s formation and consolidation and (b) that a monument’s location and construction materials reflect both logistical and symbolic concerns with salient socio-political scope. The main analysis offered here consists of a sequential, monument-by-monument archaeological assessment of RMC location and construction materials with a particular emphasis on the role of a specialist workforce. This research combines both quantitative and qualitative methods that help flesh out possible logistical and symbolic implications associated with the decision- making process behind each RMC. The working and symbolic properties of a whole range of construction materials is determined via careful use of the limited contemporary, and more abundant later, Egyptian documentary sources, as well as demonstrable patterns of material use in the archaeological record.
    [Show full text]
  • Ägyptisches Museum, Berlin
    1 Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum Past and present members of the staff of the Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Statues, Reliefs and Paintings, especially R. L. B. Moss, E. W. Burney and Jaromir Malek, have taken part in the preparation of this list at the Griffith Institute, University of Oxford This pdf version (situation on 17 January 2012): Elizabeth Fleming, Alison Hobby and Diana Magee (Assistants to the Editor) and Tracy Walker Thebes. TT 1. Sennedjem. Dyn. XIX. i2.5 Outer coffin of woman, Tamakhet, in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 10832. Aeg. Inschr. ii, 323-9; Ausf. Verz. 174. Thebes. TT 1. Sennedjem. Dyn. XIX. i2.5 Inner coffin lid of Tamakhet, in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 10859. Alterthümer pl. 28; Ausf. Verz. 174-5. Thebes. TT 1. Sennedjem. Dyn. XIX. i2.5 Box of son, Ramosi, in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 10195. Kaiser, Äg. Mus. Berlin (1967), Abb. 582; Aeg. Inschr. ii, 274; Ausf. Verz. 197. Thebes. TT 2. Khabekhnet. i2.7 Relief, Kings, etc., in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 1625. L. D. ii. 20; Aeg. Inschr. ii, 190-2; Ausf. Verz. 155-6. <<>> Thebes. TT 23. Thay. i2.40(31)-(32) Relief, deceased with Western goddess, in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 14220 (lost). Scharff, Götter Aegpytens, pl. 32; Aeg. Inschr. ii, 218; Ausf. Verz. 148. Thebes. TT 34. Mentuemhet. i2.61 Statue-group of three ape-guardians, dedicated by deceased, formerly in Bissing colln., then in The Hague, Scheurleer Museum, now in Berlin, Ägyptisches Museum, 23729. Topographical Bibliography of Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Texts, Statues, Reliefs and Paintings Griffith Institute, Sackler Library, 1 St John Street, Oxford OX1 2LG, United Kingdom [email protected] 2 Ä.Z.
    [Show full text]
  • Cults of the God Amun at Memphis: Identification, Prosopography and Toponymy
    CULTS OF THE GOD AMUN AT MEMPHIS: IDENTIFICATION, PROSOPOGRAPHY AND TOPONYMY Mariam Victoria Kamish submitted for the degree of PhD in archaeology University College London 1990 CULTS OF AMUN AT MEMPHIS for Fessar and Zena* *io alphabetical order AL-HORBAN \ \ \ \ 330Sooc- AL-MIDiYAH AL-QUSURAH \ \ TUMAN DAFBABY KHAUQ AR-RAML h BEWAL-BELADON N Birkah NAWA MlT RAHtNAH 330tooo- BAHR AL-QANTARAH ARBAIN FAKHRY S Birkah h \ ALJ QALAAH N3303ooo Memphis HELUL Hod and tom names and boundaries •dent of ruin field boundary M m PTAH ENCLOSURE VWALL 300m SABAKHAH EES grid I b - as published in Jeffreys, Survey o f MmpA/s. 2 Abstract Some fifteen cults of AmOn/Amon-R 6r are attested for Memphis, from the firs t attestations in the reign of Amenhotep II. They are AmOn/Amon-R£r of Prw-nfr/o; ob nswt t& j; of 'Inbw-Mo; pntj bvt Mrw, o\ *pit-nfr/c;<A Uwdntjt ;of N§i;<A 7pt; t/p w tn trn p w t raw n Wsr-m/rt-Rr-stp-n-Rr m pr 7mn,ol Rsbd;ot rbw,ot PJ-v-ro ;ti Pr-bnwM DnlR; and at Msdo, as this place may have been in the memphite region. Most of these cults appear to have been founded during the reign of Ramesses II, in line with a policy of malting manifest the principal deities in all their aspects and therefore in each of the major cities. Most of the temple foundations examined here were of middling size and were located in the area of central Memphis.
    [Show full text]
  • A Layer Monument Locally Called ‘El Oalch’ Meaning the Fortress Is Found at El Fayum
    SEILA A layer monument locally called ‘el OalCh’ meaning the fortress is found at el Fayum. A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE MONUMENT SEILA1 Construction The results of my investigation show that the layer monument of Seila was completely built in the reign of king Snfrw the first king of the 4th dynasty. Subsequently he built 3 pyramids with 2 subsidiaries. These buildings demonstrate a marked development in the history of pyramid construction. It is obvious that this layer monument, because of its striking similarity to step pyramids of his predecessors of the 3rd dynasty, became the last to built in their tradition and his last monument, the Red pyramid at Dahshur became the example followed by his successors of the Old and Middle Kingdoms. The discovery of a pavement, cult chapels and outer facing blocks indicate that the layer monument was completed, preserved and maintained during the 4th dynasty and with the coming of the 5th dynasty violation and destruction began.2 Ancient times During the late Old Kingdom and the First Intermediate Period, the upper part of the nucleus was exposed by the removal of the upper courses of the facing. The lower courses over a pavement were left undamaged. Subsequently the monument was left undisturbed for a considerable period, which goes much later than the Middle Kingdom. Meanwhile the exposed nucleus was subjected to weather erosion.3 Falling limestone spalls accumulated creating a thick homogeneous layer on the pavement. These spalls covered the remaining undamaged blocks of the outer facing, figure 18/4.4 1 Dr. Edwards had visited the site during my second season, and attended my lectures concerning this excavation at Oxford on June 7 1988 and at the Fifth Congress of Egyptologists in Cairo.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egypt: an Introduction Salima Ikram Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-67598-7 - Ancient Egypt: An Introduction Salima Ikram Frontmatter More information Ancient Egypt An Introduction This book provides an introduction to one of the greatest civilisations of all time – ancient Egypt. Beginning with a geographical overview that explains the development of Egyptian belief systems as well as Egypt’s subsequent political development, the book examines Egyptological methodology; the history of the discipline of Egyptology; and Egyptian religion, social organization, urban and rural life, and funerary beliefs. It also discusses how people of all ranks lived in ancient Egypt. Lavishly illustrated, with many photographs of rarely seen sites, this volume is suit- able for use in introductory-level courses on ancient Egypt. It offers a variety of student-friendly features, including a glossary, a bibliography, and a list of sources for those who wish to pursue their interest in ancient Egypt. Salima Ikram is professor of Egyptology at the American University in Cairo. An archaeologist of ancient Egypt, she is the author of several scholarly and popular books, including, most recently, Death and Burial in Ancient Egypt, Divine Creatures: Animal Mummies in Ancient Egyp t, and, with A. M. Dodson, The Tomb in Ancient Egypt and The Mummy in Ancient Egypt. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-67598-7 - Ancient Egypt: An Introduction Salima Ikram Frontmatter More information Agricultural and taxation scenes from the tomb
    [Show full text]
  • Texts from the Pyramid Age Frontstrud.Qxd 8/8/2005 4:25 PM Page Ii
    frontStrud.qxd 8/8/2005 4:25 PM Page i Texts from the Pyramid Age frontStrud.qxd 8/8/2005 4:25 PM Page ii Society of Biblical Literature Writings from the Ancient World Theodore J. Lewis, General Editor Associate Editors Edward Bleiberg Billie Jean Collins F. W. Dobbs-Allsopp Edward L. Greenstein Jo Ann Hackett Ronald J. Leprohon Niek Veldhuis Raymond Westbrook Number 16 Texts from the Pyramid Age by Nigel C. Strudwick Edited by Ronald J. Leprohon frontStrud.qxd 8/8/2005 4:25 PM Page iii Texts from the Pyramid Age by Nigel C. Strudwick Edited by Ronald J. Leprohon Society of Biblical Literature Atlanta frontStrud.qxd 8/8/2005 4:25 PM Page iv TEXTS FROM THE PYRAMID AGE Copyright © 2005 Society of Biblical Literature All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, or by means of any information storage or retrieval system, except as may be expressly permitted by the 1976 Copyright Act or in writing from the pub- lisher. Requests for permission should be addressed in writing to the Rights and Permissions Office, Society of Biblical Literature, 825 Houston Mill Road, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA. The Semitica transliteration font used in this work is available from Linguist Software (www.linguist software.com), 425-775-1130. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Strudwick, Nigel. Texts from the pyramid age / by Nigel C. Strudwick. p. cm. — (Writings from the ancient world ; no. 16) Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • The Layer Monuments
    THE LAYER MONUMENTS Six layer monuments namely Hebenu, Sinki, Nubt, el Kula, el Ghenimiya and Elephantine (see entries) were built by a king or kings unknown to us and serve a purpose which is hitherto unclear. The investigations concerning them are incomplete, but some light however has been cast: they are almost of the same construction, dimensions, and seem to date to the 3rd dynasty; they have no substructures nor temples and are not within a cemetery of that period. To the 6 layer monuments some monuments could be added or related: Two pairs of tumuli at Naqada, investigated by Petrie. A square structure of rough masonry truly oriented to the cardinal points, of a side measurement of 11 m, suggest that it was a core of an unfinished or destroyed layer monument. It was excavated under the Middle Kingdom chapel of Ay at Abydos by C.T. Currelly. A benben named Seketra, and perhaps a pyramid named Nefer, recorded in ink on stone vessels discovered under the step pyramid at Saqqara. The pyramid of Snofru at Seila (see entry). Two step pyramids of queens of Menkaura at Giza (# G3b and G3c), differ in structure and function. Two benbens dating to the 5th dynasty in the sun temples of Userkaf at Abu Sir and Neuserra at Abu Ghurab. Four 5th dynasty benbens of other kings known from texts. With the exception of Ghenimiya which has never been excavated the other 5 layer monuments and Seila have only been partly investigated. The nuclei of Hebenu, Sinki and Nubt were built of quarried limestone and selected concretions from the slopes of the nearby plateau, Seila and el Kula were built of quarried limestone, el Ghenimiya was built of quarried sandstone and Elephantine was built of quarried granite and selected bolder.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place Where Huni Probably Buried Bohai,Xu
    The Place where Huni probably Buried Bohai,Xu Address: Suzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou, China Abstract: From the paper , we can speculate that Huni is exactly 吴回 (wuhui). Besides, the pronunciation of Huni resembles 吴回(wuhui). From the paper I speculate that the eagle in the statue unearthed in Taibo's tomb and the eagle in a statue of a man, dating from the State of Yue era, the eagles in the two statues resemble the God Horus in Egypt, so I can also get a conclusion that Wuxi(无锡) and Zhejiang(浙江) was once Egypt’s colony. I can also get a conclusion that Zhangshan Hill(嶂 山)means Egypt governor or pharaoh had come to Wuxi. Besides, we can get a conclusion that Chanshan Hill(产山)is a man-made pyramid, and Heliekou(河埒口)means enclosure around the man-made pyramid- Chanshan Hill, this pyramid complex looks like Djoser's Pyramid Complex which has enclosure around it. From the paper, we can conclude that Huishan clay figurines(惠山泥人)are ushabtis with Chinese characteristic, it indicates that Wuxi(无锡)was the colony of ancient Egypt. So Wuxi(无锡)means binding spot, Mount Xi(锡山) means a binding hill. And the ruins of Mount Xi(锡山) resemble "Pyramid of Khufu" in Giza pyramid complex. So we can get a hypothesis that Mount Xi(锡山) is a man-made pyramid. Furthermore, Wuxi (无锡)is the cradle of Chinese Wu culture(吴 文化), I think this is owing to Huni. So from the above, we can speculate that Huni probably buried in Mount Xi , Wuxi(无锡锡山).
    [Show full text]