DOCSLIB.ORG

Cults of the God Amun at Memphis: Identification, Prosopography and Toponymy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cults of the God Amun at Memphis: Identification, Prosopography and Toponymy CULTS OF THE GOD AMUN AT MEMPHIS: IDENTIFICATION, PROSOPOGRAPHY AND TOPONYMY Mariam Victoria Kamish submitted for the degree of PhD in archaeology University College London 1990 CULTS OF AMUN AT MEMPHIS for Fessar and Zena* *io alphabetical order AL-HORBAN \ \ \ \ 330Sooc- AL-MIDiYAH AL-QUSURAH \ \ TUMAN DAFBABY KHAUQ AR-RAML h BEWAL-BELADON N Birkah NAWA MlT RAHtNAH 330tooo- BAHR AL-QANTARAH ARBAIN FAKHRY S Birkah h \ ALJ QALAAH N3303ooo Memphis HELUL Hod and tom names and boundaries •dent of ruin field boundary M m PTAH ENCLOSURE VWALL 300m SABAKHAH EES grid I b - as published in Jeffreys, Survey o f MmpA/s. 2 Abstract Some fifteen cults of AmOn/Amon-R 6r are attested for Memphis, from the firs t attestations in the reign of Amenhotep II. They are AmOn/Amon-R£r of Prw-nfr/o; ob nswt t& j; of 'Inbw-Mo; pntj bvt Mrw, o\ *pit-nfr/c;<A Uwdntjt ;of N§i;<A 7pt; t/p w tn trn p w t raw n Wsr-m/rt-Rr-stp-n-Rr m pr 7mn,ol Rsbd;ot rbw,ot PJ-v-ro ;ti Pr-bnwM DnlR; and at Msdo, as this place may have been in the memphite region. Most of these cults appear to have been founded during the reign of Ramesses II, in line with a policy of malting manifest the principal deities in all their aspects and therefore in each of the major cities. Most of the temple foundations examined here were of middling size and were located in the area of central Memphis. AmOn/Amon-Rftr of P rw -a fr/*, however, was the chief deity at P rw -n fr/ 9, some distance from the central city, and several others of the cults were also sited elsewhere in the memphite region. The iconography and epithets associated with AmOn/Amon-Rt'' of Memphis are standard, with no local peculiarities. Am0n/Amon-R0r is notably well-attested at Memphis. The period examined terminates with the conquest of Alexander. A few Ptolemaic attestations, however, are included. The material surveyed includes private monuments and votive material, royal monuments, temple inscriptions, administrative papyri, scarabs and amulets. The principal aim of the study has been to make a contribution to knowledge of Memphis in the context of rescue archaeology at the site. 4 acknowledgements During work ofi the thesis In Egypt in 19S3 and in the course of an A.R.C.E. fellowship in 1986- 87 l t a great many people were very kind to me in my work. I should like to thank Dr. Mohammed Saleh, director of the Cairo Museum, Dr. A li al-Khouli, Mr. Nassif Hassan, Mr. Fouad Yacoub and Madame Fauzia Bishara of the Egyptian Antiquities Organisation administration. Professor Hassanein Rahtra of the University of Cairo, Dr. Holeil Ghaly of the Saqq&rah and M it Rahinah inspectorates, Dr. Abdel Fatah Sobahy of the Glzah inspectorate, Mr. Nadir Ramadan, Mr. Ferghali Qandfl and Mr. Mohammed Rashid of the M lt Rahinah inspectorate and Madame Amlra Khattab of the American Research Center in Egypt and her staff. Dr. Lanny Bell, former director of Chicago House, Luxor, gave me access to the Chicago House Library and to archive material. Many staff and former staff of the Cairo Museum, in particular Mr. Mohammed Hagros; staff of the Cairo Museum Library; and the French Institute Library gave me their assistance. I am grateful to Mr. Okasha Edaly and his family, to Rais Hilmi Mohammed Yusuf and his family, to Mr Salah al-Dln Mohammed Hasiballa and his family, to Rais Said Salim, and to Mr Michael Jones for their kindness and their discussions on the historical topography of the Memphis region. 1 should also like to mention the countless people, whom I met only in passing in the course of the toponym survey, who gave of their time and hospitality, as the survey group passed through their area. I must particularly thank Madame Mai Trad of the Cairo Museum, my partner and teacher in the toponym survey, who gave so generously of her time, her deep knowledge and expertise, and her s k ill in solving administrative difficulties. My thanks also go to Rais Qatb Mohammed Mojiammed Saif whose vast knowledge and resource were responsible for so much of our results. I am grateful to the American Research Center in Egypt for sponsoring the fellowship, to the Egyptian M inistry of Education for providing the opportunity for me to study in Egypt and to the Egyptian Antiquities Organisation for making the work possible. Dr. David O'Connor of the Department of Egyptology, the University of Pennsylvania, at the request of Professor H.S. Smith, made it possible for me to work on unpublished material from Memphis in the storerooms and archives of the University of Pennsylvania Musem. It is by his permission that the Philadelphia material is quoted here. Ms. Mary Elizabeth Ruwell of the University of Pennsylvania Museum Archives made the archive material available and the late Mr. Charles Detwiler of the antiquities stores of the museum gave me a great deal of his help. Professor Edward Wente and the late Dr. Klaus Baer of the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago discussed ancient egyptlan religion with me and with Professor George Hughes encouraged me as an undergraduate. Staff of the Oriental Institute Museum Archives and the antiquities stores also gave me their help. Dr. Jaromir Malek of the TopographicalBibi^hy, the G riffith Institute, Oxford, gave me access to the G riffith Institute Library and the benefit of valuable discussions. Dr. Jeffrey Spencer of the British Museum gave me access to object cards in the British Museum. Dr. Patricia Spencer, chief archivist, the Egypt Exploration Society, gave me help on numerous occasions and encouraged me in the original choice of subject. Ms. Barbara Adams, curator and Ms. Rosalind Hall, assistant curator of the Petrie Museum were a great help on very many occasions. Dr. Alison Roberts, Honourary Fellow of the Petrie Museum, discussed Mut and Hathor and the psychology of religion with me, and gave me references to material published and unpublished. I would like to give my thanks to staff of the Department of Egyptology, University College London: to Ms. Elizabeth Blyth for all her kindness and her help both academic and practical; to Dr. David Dixon, who gave me valuable bibliographical references and advice; to Professor Geoffrey Martin, who was responsible for the theme of the thesis, as references to Amun at Memphis had long interested him, and who gave me the benefit of much advice in the early stages of the work, including help with references, format and prosopographical methodology; and to Dr. David Jeffreys, by whose kindness plates from The survey o f Memphis appear here, who took the time to 1 made possible with a grant from the U.S.I.A. 5 teach me a great deal during the field work in 1983, and who has often given me advice and encouragement in the memphite work. I am very grateful to my colleagues at University College London: to Mr. Saif al-Islam Mohammed Assim abd al-Kader who spent enormous amounts of time teaching colloquial Arabic to a most unpromising student and who arranged accoa/mdation for me through his family for the fellowship year in Egypt; to Mr. Robert Morkot who has always kept a weather eye for any references which might be of use, particularly in nubian and nubian related material, a kindness which has brought me several invaluable finds which would entirely have escaped my notice and whose thoughts on the evolution of conceptions of kingship have been very illuminating; to Dr. Mark Collier, as he is now, whose devotion to Intellectual rigour has been an inspiration and a challenge and who has always been w illin g to give his time to other people s work, most recently in chasing up references when I was unable to get to a library. To all my colleagues at University College London, I give my thanks; in Wepwawtt and in the UQL egypto/ogy seminars we did work which brought a ll of us forward and perhaps laid the basis, as we hoped, of future contributions by those of us who remain in the field towards coherency of thought in the discipline. None of that would ever have been begun if it had not been for the influence of Professor Harry Smith of the Department of Egyptology, University College London, who has a great g ift as a gardiner of human beings. He has always given, in the kindest possible way, his thoughtful attention and the fru its of his observation and experience to every individual with whom he has come into contact. Many of the group of students whom 1 knew have gone on to various other work, but they each bear the mark of Professor Smith s encouragement in iconoclasm, so that it is those who have grown to disagree with him in various matters who most particularly owe him a tremendous debt for his nourishing of their minds and characters. I certainly owe him a great deal. 6 preface i. def ence of the methodology of the research. There is today in egyptology some contention between proponents of the model-forming and the descriptive approaches. Perhaps it is not the case that every one of us takes part in the debate, but it is fa ir to say that its reverberations are fe lt everywhere in the field. Each of the methods is claimed for science and rigour. The model-maker finds the descriptive egyptologist a curator of data rather than an original thinker (and derides this), while the descriptive egyptologist finds the model maker too hotly imaginative, a dilettante f ather fields and insufficiently versed in the technical details of his or her own.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Make an Egyptian Diorama
    How to Make an Egyptian Diorama http://www.wikihow.com/Make‐a‐Diorama A diorama is a small model of a real‐life scene that has lifelike details and a realistic background. Since we are reading, “The Curse of the Pharaohs”, you will be creating an Egyptian themed tomb as though you were an ancient Egyptian King or Queen. Steps for creating your Egyptian Tomb 1. Choose a tomb scene to re‐create in a shoebox. 2. Make sketches of how you want your diorama to look. Plan the front, back, sides, and top. Make the inside of the diorama look as deep and 3 dimensional as you can. Make a list of the things you will need to make your diorama. Use a variety of materials. 3. Make a base for the model out of a shoebox. Make sure your box is sturdy. 4. Find small figures to go along with your scene or make them out of clay, printouts, pipe cleaners, plasticine or other materials. Use your imagination. 5. Be creative. Anything you can find (cotton balls, leaves, twigs, etc.) will work. 6. Hang flying objects with clear string such as monofilament used for fishing line, if you have it. 7. Write a caption for your diorama. In your caption include the book you read and author. 8. You will also put an Egyptian‐styled Curse to warn others not to disturb your tomb. Tips • Put bigger items in the back, leaving the scene easy to see. • The most important object of your diorama should be centered or just a bit off center to draw the viewers attention to it first.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Language Was Created by Sumerian Turks
    Advances in Anthropology, 2017, 7, 197-250 http://www.scirp.org/journal/aa ISSN Online: 2163-9361 ISSN Print: 2163-9353 The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Language Was Created by Sumerian Turks Metin Gündüz Retired Physician, Diplomate ABEM (American Board of Emergency Medicine), Izmir, Turkey How to cite this paper: Gündüz, M. (2017). Abstract The Ancient Egyptian Hieroglyphic Lan- guage Was Created by Sumerian Turks. The “phonetic sound value of each and every hieroglyphic picture’s expressed Advances in Anthropology, 7, 197-250. and intended meaning as a verb or as a noun by the creators of the ancient https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2017.74013 Egyptian hieroglyphic picture symbols, ‘exactly matches’, the same meaning” Received: August 2, 2017 as well as the “first letter of the corresponding meaning of the Turkish word’s Accepted: October 13, 2017 first syllable” with the currently spoken dialects of the Turkish language. The Published: October 16, 2017 exact intended sound value as well as the meaning of hieroglyphic pictures as Copyright © 2017 by author and nouns or verbs is individually and clearly expressed in the original hierog- Scientific Research Publishing Inc. lyphic pictures. This includes the 30 hieroglyphic pictures of well-known con- This work is licensed under the Creative sonants as well as some vowel sounds-of the language of the ancient Egyp- Commons Attribution International tians. There is no exception to this rule. Statistical and probabilistic certainty License (CC BY 4.0). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ beyond any reasonable doubt proves the Turkish language connection. The Open Access hieroglyphic pictures match with 2 variables (the phonetic value and intended meaning).
    [Show full text]
  • A Catalogue of the Egyptian Collection in the Fitzwilliam
    ~ O=Jl."'~~] lJlC01~~~] ~ O~!>hl!>hl-;] lJl G~~~] S:O=~f1"'~~] CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY CO LL E C TION Books of enduring scholarly value Cambridge The city of Cambridge received its royal charter in 1201, having already been home to Britons, Romans and Anglo-Saxons for many centuries. Cambridge University was founded soon afterwards and celebrates its octocentenary in 2009. This series explores the history and influence of Cambridge as a centre of science, learning, and discovery, its contributions to national and global politics and culture, and its inevitable controversies and scandals. A Catalogue of the Egyptian Collection in the Fitzwilliam Museum, Cambridge Since the first donations of Egyptian artefacts to the Fitzwilliam Museum, including most notably the sarcophagus lid of Rameses III donated in 1823, its ancient Egyptian holdings have grown steadily. This collection, now one of the most important in Britain, was catalogued for the first time by Sir Ernest Alfred Thompson Wallis Budge (1857–1934) of the British Museum’s department of antiquities. Budge was a leading authority on ancient Egypt and had himself acquired several pieces for the museum in Egypt in 1886-7. The collection as listed in this 1893 publication included 577 objects: sarcophagi, coffins, canopic jars, mummies, scarabs, sculptures, and other decorative objects. Budge provided transcriptions and translations of the hieroglyphs that appear on the objects with his descriptions of each item. Although the collection has been augmented by many further gifts and purchases, Budge’s catalogue remains a valuable record of the collection in the late Victorian period. Cambridge University Press has long been a pioneer in the reissuing of out-of- print titles from its own backlist, producing digital reprints of books that are still sought after by scholars and students but could not be reprinted economically using traditional technology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Face of Augustus's Aggressive Inclination to Egypt
    Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality Volume 12 - June 2015 - No 1 - Pages: (35 : 56) The Other Face of Augustus’s Aggressive Inclination to Egypt Wahid Omran Lecturer in Tourist Guidance Dep., Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Fayoum University Introduction The initial attitude of Octavian against Egypt is proved by his speech to his troops on the evening before the battle of Actium. Pride in his Roman birth is compared to the despicability of an Egyptian woman as an opponent, who is supported by Dio Cassius reference.1 "Alexandrians and Egyptians- what worse or what truer name could one apply to them?- who worship reptiles and beasts as gods, who embalm their own bodies to give them semblance of immortality, who are most reckless in effrontery but most feeble in courage, and worst of all are slaves to a woman and not to a man". Since The Roman poet Virgile (70- 19 B.C), 2 the Romans opposed the animal – cult of the Egyptians, and considered these gods as monsters.3 The Egyptian character of the Augustus's opponents is related to the Augustan propaganda, represented the Augustus's war against Antony and Cleopatra not only a civil war between Rome and Egypt, but like a struggle between the West and the East. Whose Mark Antony was a traitor joined the powers of the East, whereas Octavian's victory in Actium was not only for himself, but basically for Rome and the Romans. This struggle was described in literature's documents as a civil strife or a foreign war.4 Augustus also knew he had a compensated war against Antony and Cleopatra as a republican magistrate crushing Oriental despotism.5 He is supported by the Roman society ethics and the star of the sacred Caesar, on the other hand, Antony, once a great Roman commander-in-chief, but now supported by a foreign army and followed by unnamed Egyptian spouse.6 The Romans considered the battle not only a military, but either a religious one between the Roman and the Egyptian Pantheons.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.02 Base of a Bronze Statuette May Osiris-Iah-Thoth Give Life, Prosperity and Health to Padiwesir, Son of Udjahekau, Born of the Lady of the Bronze
    01 Part 1-3/S. 1-249/korr.drh 04.08.2006 16:00 Uhr Seite 171 Late Period, Ptolemaic and Roman Periods 171 been found in this hollow space. Often the space is not many thousands of animal mummies laid to rest in nearly large enough to contain a complete animal underground catacombs at this time – what to us is a mummy, so a relic consisting of only a few bones had to rather bizarre custom served to ensure a personal con- suffice. These relic holders served the same aim as the tact between the god and man. MJR 3.02 Base of a bronze statuette May Osiris-Iah-Thoth give life, prosperity and health to Padiwesir, son of Udjahekau, born of the lady of the Bronze. house, the lay priestess of Mut, Iriru”. The title given to Late Period, Dynasty 25–26, c.712–525BC. the mother is quite rare; its literal meaning is “follower” H. 2.4cm, W. 4.5cm, D. 5.7cm. or “female servant” of Mut; women with this title appear to have served as a kind of unofficial, uncanon- ical priestesses in the temple of the goddess Mut in Kar- This hollow rectangular base is all that is left of what nak.2 They are chiefly known from a number of bronze was once a statuette of Osiris-Iah-Thoth, a lunar form 1 mirrors which played an important part in certain ritu- of the god Osiris. The appearance of the god would in als connected with Mut. The title is attested only from all essential aspects have been the same as our no.3.16: the time of Dynasties 25 and 26.
    [Show full text]
  • Demotic Dictionary Project
    oi.uchicago.edu PHILOLOGY DEMOTIC DICTIONARY PROJECT Janet H.Johnson This year, as for the past several years, the Demotic Dictionary staff concentrated on checking drafts of entries for individual letters in the Egyptian "alphabet" and preparing and entering computer scan copies of the actual Demotic words. The only student work­ ing on the project this year was Thomas Dousa, whose command of Egyptian and Greek and the extensive literature in both has allowed him to make major contributions to the checking and rewriting of first draft entries. Thanks to a very generous bequest from Professor and Mrs. George R. Hughes, we anticipate being able next year to hire a recent Ph.D. graduate as Research Associate to work full time on checking of draft and preparation of scans and copies. The checking and rewriting of first draft entries involves double checking of all in­ formation provided in the entry and the incorporation of several categories of informa­ tion that we decided to include after the first drafts had been written. Many of these categories are being added to provide social or cultural information as part of the "meaning" of a word. For example, whenever the "word" is the name of a deity, a refer­ ence is provided to every geographic location (e.g., a specific city or cemetery) with which the deity is associated in the texts of the corpus from which the Chicago Demotic Dictionary is being drawn. Similarly, whenever the "word" being discussed is the name of a geographic location, reference is made to all deities mentioned in the texts of our corpus in conjunction with that geographic location.
    [Show full text]
  • CANAANITES READING HIEROGLYPHS* Horus Is Hathor? – the Invention of the Alphabet in Sinai
    CANAANITES READING HIEROGLYPHS* Horus is Hathor? – The Invention of the Alphabet in Sinai By Orly Goldwasser This article is dedicated to the memory of Menakhem Shuval, a student at Tel Aviv University. Shuval wrote a Ph.D. thesis on local scarab production in Middle Bronze Age Canaan under the supervision of the late Pirhia Beck and myself. He concentrated on the definition of the local Canaanite scarab industry and collected hundreds of examples, which he divided into types of “specific Canaanite motifs.”1 His sudden death in December 1995 left behind a very extensive, unfinished manuscript, which comprises hundreds of pages of texts and plates and which has never been published. Many recent publications have confirmed his conclusions. May he rest in peace. PART ONE: HORUS IS HATHOR? to identify by the uninitiated as well, carry full meanings6 such as “the king of Upper and Lower An early, yet very common, combination of signs Egypt,” “life,7” “good,” “stability,” “gold,” “unifica- on Middle Bronze Age scarabs is (Fig. 1). It is tion,” “His Majesty,” “protection,” etc.; all these very frequently attested in Canaan and Byblos, signs may have simultaneously carried the addi- but is rare in Egypt.2 It does not appear in the tional prestige value “Egyptian” for their users. Uronarti collection or any other dated Egyptian One should remember that even in Egypt only a example, and is known from Tell el-Dabca from very small percentage of the population could two surface finds to date.3 This motif was by and read and write: the estimated range is 1–3%.8 Yet large explained by scholars as a combination of probably every Egyptian, and many foreigners the hieroglyph of the Horus falcon and a crudely too, would have recognized these specific icons executed n®r (R8) hieroglyph.4 and would have understood their meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Religion a Handbook
    A HANDBOOK OF EGYPTIAN RELIGION A HANDBOOK OF EGYPTIAN RELIGION BY ADOLF ERMAN WITH 130 ILLUSTRATIONS Published in tile original German edition as r handbook, by the Ge:r*rm/?'~?~~ltunf of the Berlin Imperial Morcums TRANSLATED BY A. S. GRIFFITH LONDON ARCHIBALD CONSTABLE & CO. LTD. '907 Itic~mnoCLAY B 80~8,L~~II'ED BRIIO 6Tllll&I "ILL, E.C., AY" DUN,I*Y, RUFIOLP. ; ,, . ,ill . I., . 1 / / ., l I. - ' PREFACE TO THE ENGLISH EDITION THEvolume here translated appeared originally in 1904 as one of the excellent series of handbooks which, in addition to descriptive catalogues, are ~rovidedby the Berlin Museums for the guida,nce of visitors to their great collections. The haud- book of the Egyptian Religion seemed cspecially worthy of a wide circulation. It is a survey by the founder of the modern school of Egyptology in Germany, of perhaps tile most interest- ing of all the departments of this subject. The Egyptian religion appeals to some because of its endless variety of form, and the many phases of superstition and belief that it represents ; to others because of its early recognition of a high moral principle, its elaborate conceptions of a life aftcr death, and its connection with the development of Christianity; to others again no doubt because it explains pretty things dear to the collector of antiquities, and familiar objects in museums. Professor Erman is the first to present the Egyptian religion in historical perspective; and it is surely a merit in his worlc that out of his profound knowledge of the Egyptian texts, he permits them to tell their own tale almost in their own words, either by extracts or by summaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Dieties
    Ancient Egyptian Dieties Amun: When Amun’s city, Thebes, rose to power in the New Kingdom (1539-1070 B.C.), Amun became known as the “King of the Gods.” He was worshipped as the high god throughout Egypt. Able to take many shapes, Amun was sometimes shown as a ram or goose, but was usually shown in human form. He is fundamentally a Creator God and his name, Amun, means “The Hidden One.” Amun-Re: Originating in the Middle Kingdom, (2055 - 1650 B.C.), Amun-Re is a fusion of the Gods Amun and Re. He combined the invisible power of creation and the power visible in heat and light. Anubis: Usually represented as a black jackal, or as a human with a canine head, Anubis was a guardian of mummies, tombs, and cemeteries, as well as an escort of the deceased to the afterlife. Atum: According to the most ancient Egyptian creation myths, Atum is the creator of the world. He also brought the first gods Shu (air), Tefnut (water), Geb (earth), and Nut (sky) to Egypt. He is also god of the setting sun. Atum was represented in many forms such as a human, a human with the head of a ram, and a combination of an eel and a cobra. Bastet: Originating as early as Dynasty II (2820-2670 B.C.), Bastet was represented as a cat or a woman with a lioness’s head. She eventually became Egypt’s most important “cat goddess.” If Bastet took the form of a cat she was considered content, but if Bastet was a lioness she was considered an angry goddess.
    [Show full text]
  • Karnak: Settlements
    UCLA UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology Title Karnak: Settlements Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1q346284 Journal UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, 1(1) Authors Millet, Marie Masson, Aurélia Publication Date 2011-07-27 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California KARNAK: SETTLEMENTS الكرنك: المناطق السكنية Marie Millet and Aurélia Masson EDITORS WILLEKE WENDRICH Editor-in-Chief Area Editor Geography University of California, Los Angeles JACCO DIELEMAN Editor University of California, Los Angeles ELIZABETH FROOD Editor University of Oxford JOHN BAINES Senior Editorial Consultant University of Oxford Short Citation: Millet and Masson, 2011, Karnak: Settlements. UEE. Full Citation: Millet, Marie and Aurélia Masson, 2011, Karnak: Settlements. In Willeke Wendrich (ed.), UCLA Encyclopedia of Egyptology, Los Angeles. http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0027fcnz 1176 Version 1, July 2011 http://digital2.library.ucla.edu/viewItem.do?ark=21198/zz0027fcnz KARNAK: SETTLEMENTS الكرنك: المناطق السكنية Marie Millet and Aurélia Masson Karnak: Siedlungen Karnak: L’habitat At Karnak, in addition to the well known temples, there is another type of architecture: the settlements. They are a testimony of the everyday life of the ancient Egyptians for which remains have been found throughout all of the temples of Karnak. Continuous occupation from the First Intermediate Period until the Late Roman Period is well attested at different locations in the complex of Karnak. Settlements are easily recognizable by their use of brick, especially mud-brick. The artifacts and organic remains found during new excavations of settlements give us a good idea of the inhabitants and their daily life.
    [Show full text]
  • Toponymic Culture of China's Ethnic Minorities' Languages
    E/CONF.94/CRP.24 7 June 2002 English only Eighth United Nations Conference on the Standardization of Geographical Names Berlin, 27 August-5 September 2002 Item 9 (c) of the provisional agenda* National standardization: treatment of names in multilingual areas Toponymic culture of China’s ethnic minorities’ languages Submitted by China** * E/CONF.94/1. ** Prepared by Wang Jitong, General-Director, China Institute of Toponymy. 02-41902 (E) *0241902* E/CONF.94/CRP.24 Toponymic Culture of China’s Ethnic Minorities’ Languages Geographical names are fossil of history and culture. Many important meanings are contained in the geographical names of China’s Ethnic Minorities’ languages. I. The number and distribution of China’s Ethnic Minorities There are 55 minorities in China have been determined now. 53 of them have their own languages, which belong to 5 language families, but the Hui and the Man use Chinese (Han language). There are 29 nationalities’ languages belong to Sino-Tibetan family, including Zang, Menba, Zhuang, Bouyei, Dai, Dong, Mulam, Shui, Maonan, Li, Yi, Lisu, Naxi, Hani, Lahu, Jino, Bai, Jingpo, Derung, Qiang, Primi, Lhoba, Nu, Aching, Miao, Yao, She, Tujia and Gelao. These nationalities distribute mainly in west and center of Southern China. There are 17 minority nationalities’ languages belong to Altaic family, including Uygul, Kazak, Uzbek, Salar, Tatar, Yugur, Kirgiz, Mongol, Tu, Dongxiang, Baoan, Daur, Xibe, Hezhen, Oroqin, Ewenki and Chaoxian. These nationalities distribute mainly in west and east of Northern China. There are 3 minority nationalities’ languages belong to South- Asian family, including Va, Benglong and Blang. These nationalities distribute mainly in Southwest China’s Yunnan Province.
    [Show full text]
  • Egyptian Ushabtis HIXENBAUGH ANCIENT ART 320 East 81St Street New York, NY 10028
    Hixenbaugh Ancient Art 320 East 81st Street New York Servants for Eternity: Egyptian Ushabtis HIXENBAUGH ANCIENT ART 320 East 81st Street New York, NY 10028 Tuesday - Saturday 11 to 6 and by appointment For more information and to view hundreds of other fine authentic antiquities see our web site: www.hixenbaugh.net [email protected] 212.861.9743 Member: International Association of Dealers in Ancient Art (IADAA) Appraisers Association of America (AAA) Art and Antique Dealers League of America (AADLA) Confederation Internationale des Negociants en Oeuvres d'Art (CINOA) All pieces are guaranteed authentic and as described and have been acquired and imported in full accordance with all U.S. and foreign regulations governing the antiquities trade. © Hixenbaugh Ancient Art Ltd, 2014 Table of Contents 1. Overview (page 3) 2. New Kingdom Limestone Ushabti (page 4) 3. Crown Prince Khaemwaset (pages 5 - 7) 4. Queen Isetnofret (page 8) 5. Crown Prince Ramesses (page 8) 6. Princess Meryetptah (page 9) 7. Hori (page 10) 8. Prince Maatptah (page 11) 9. Huy (page 11) 10. Neferrenpet (pages 12 - 13) 11. Overseer (Reis) Ushabtis (page 14) 12. New Kingdom Ladies of the House (page 15) 13. High Priestess, Divine Adoratrice, Henuttawy (pages 16 - 17) 14. Third Intermediate Period Ushabtis (pages 18 - 19) 15. Late Period Ushabtis (pages 20 - 21) 16. Select Reading (page 22) 1 Overview Ushabtis (shabtis or shawabtis), ancient Egyptian mummiform statuettes, have long fascinated Egyptologists and collectors of ancient art. The ushabti’s appeal manifests itself on multiple levels – artistic, historical, and epigraphic. Since these mummiform tomb figures were produced in great numbers in antiquity and vary widely in terms of quality, medium, and size, they are available to collectors today of different tastes and at all price levels.
    [Show full text]