(Baker) Ridl. (Zingiberaceae) in Peninsular Malaysia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
GALLEY 631 File # 49Ee
Allen Press • DTPro System GALLEY 631 File # 49ee Name /alis/22_149 12/16/2005 11:34AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 631 # 1 Aliso, 22(1), pp. 631–642 ᭧ 2006, by The Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, CA 91711-3157 GONDWANAN VICARIANCE OR DISPERSAL IN THE TROPICS? THE BIOGEOGRAPHIC HISTORY OF THE TROPICAL MONOCOT FAMILY COSTACEAE (ZINGIBERALES) CHELSEA D. SPECHT1 The New York Botanical Garden, Institute of Plant Systematics, Bronx, New York 10458, USA ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Costaceae are a pantropical family, distinguished from other families within the order Zingiberales by their spiral phyllotaxy and showy labellum comprised of five fused staminodes. While the majority of Costaceae species are found in the neotropics, the pantropical distribution of the family as a whole could be due to a number of historical biogeographic scenarios, including continental-drift mediated vicariance and long-distance dispersal events. Here, the hypothesis of an ancient Gondwanan distri- bution followed by vicariance via continental drift as the leading cause of the current pantropical distribution of Costaceae is tested, using molecular dating of cladogenic events combined with phy- logeny-based biogeographic analyses. Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis (DIVA) is used to determine an- cestral distributions based upon the modern distribution of extant taxa in a phylogenetic context. Diversification ages within Costaceae are estimated using chloroplast DNA data (trnL–F and trnK) analyzed with a local clock procedure. In the absence of fossil evidence, the divergence time between Costaceae and Zingiberaceae, as estimated in an ordinal analysis of Zingiberales, is used as the cali- bration point for converting relative to absolute ages. -
Rich Zingiberales
RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: The Tree of Death: The Role of Fossils in Resolving the Overall Pattern of Plant Phylogeny Building the monocot tree of death: Progress and challenges emerging from the macrofossil- rich Zingiberales Selena Y. Smith1,2,4,6 , William J. D. Iles1,3 , John C. Benedict1,4, and Chelsea D. Specht5 Manuscript received 1 November 2017; revision accepted 2 May PREMISE OF THE STUDY: Inclusion of fossils in phylogenetic analyses is necessary in order 2018. to construct a comprehensive “tree of death” and elucidate evolutionary history of taxa; 1 Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of however, such incorporation of fossils in phylogenetic reconstruction is dependent on the Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA availability and interpretation of extensive morphological data. Here, the Zingiberales, whose 2 Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, familial relationships have been difficult to resolve with high support, are used as a case study MI 48109, USA to illustrate the importance of including fossil taxa in systematic studies. 3 Department of Integrative Biology and the University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA METHODS: Eight fossil taxa and 43 extant Zingiberales were coded for 39 morphological seed 4 Program in the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann characters, and these data were concatenated with previously published molecular sequence Arbor, MI 48109, USA data for analysis in the program MrBayes. 5 School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Plant Biology and the Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA KEY RESULTS: Ensete oregonense is confirmed to be part of Musaceae, and the other 6 Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) seven fossils group with Zingiberaceae. -
Building the Monocot Tree of Death
Received Date: Revised Date: Accepted Date: Article Type: Special Issue Article RESEARCH ARTICLE INVITED SPECIAL ARTICLE For the Special Issue: The Tree of Death: The Role of Fossils in Resolving the Overall Pattern of Plant Phylogeny Short Title: Building the monocot tree of death Building the monocot tree of death: progress and challenges emerging from the macrofossil-rich Zingiberales 1,2,4,6 1,3 1,4 5 Selena Y. Smith , William J. D. Iles , John C. Benedict , and Chelsea D. Specht Manuscript received 1 November 2017; revision accepted 2 May 2018. 1 Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA 2 Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA 3 Department of Integrative Biology and the University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA 4 Program in the Environment, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA 5 School of Integrative Plant Sciences, Section of Plant Biology and the Bailey Hortorium, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA 6 Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]); ORCID id 0000-0002-5923-0404 Author Manuscript This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1123 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved Smith et al.–Building the monocot tree of death Citation: Smith, S. Y., W. J. D. -
Materials Towards a Revision of Aulotandra Gagnep. (Zingiberaceae)
Gardens’Materials Towards Bulletin a Revision Singapore of Aulotandra 59 (1&2): 139-144. 2007 139 Materials Towards a Revision of Aulotandra Gagnep. (Zingiberaceae) M.F. NEWMAN Royal Botanic Garden, 20A Inverleith Row Edinburgh EH3 5LR, Scotland, UK Abstract Aulotandra Gagnep. has recently been transferred from the subfamily Alpinioideae, tribe Alpinieae, to the subfamily Siphonochiloideae. Materials towards a revision of Aulotandra and Siphonochilus J.M.Wood & Franks are presented. Introduction Harris et al. (2006) have included Aulotandra Gagnep. in a phylogenetic analysis in order to determine its correct place in the new classification of Zingiberaceae by Kress et al. (2002). Aulotandra was, until recently, the only African genus of Zingiberaceae which had not been included in a molecular systematic study. Two molecular datasets, chloroplast and nuclear, placed Aulotandra closest to Siphonochilus J.M. Wood & Franks, showing that genetic divergence levels were smaller between accessions of Aulotandra and Siphonochilus than between Aulotandra and any other taxon included in the analysis. In addition, phylogenetic analyses of the two data matrices showed that the species of Aulotandra and Siphonochilus sampled in that study formed a monophyletic group. It was clear from the shared synapomorphies and the high branch support for the clade containing these genera that this relationship was very close. The two data sets showed some discrepancy as to the relationships between these two genera - the ITS analysis indicating that Aulotandra was monophyletic, but the trnL-F results suggesting that the two genera were paraphyletic. Accepting that Aulotandra and Siphonochilus form a monophyletic group led to the transfer of Aulotandra from subfamily Alpinioideae, tribe Alpinieae, to subfamily Siphonochiloideae. -
Response of the Endangered Medicinal Plant Siphonochilus Aethiopicus (Schweif.) B.L. Burt. to Agronomic Practices
Response of the Endangered Medicinal Plant Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweif.) B.L. Burt. to Agronomic Practices by James Francis Hartzell Submitted in fulfillment of the academic requirements of Master of Science in Plant Pathology School of Agricultural Sciences and Agribusiness Faculty of Science and Agriculture University of KwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa December 14, 2011 i Response of the Endangered Medicinal Plant Siphonochilus aethiopicus (Schweif.) B.L. Burt. to Agronomic Practices Thesis Abstract This study examines field cropping constraints for domestication of an endangered, wild medicinal plant, Siphonochilus aethiopicus, (Schweif.) B.L. Burt. Extensive literature review and careful observations of plant growth behavior during two years of crop trials overturned several long-held but erroneous claims that have consistently appeared in the scholarly literature, and revealed previously undocumented plant growth characteristics. S. aethiopicus (Schweif.) B.L. Burt. is a rhizomatous corm, not a rhizome. Field growth observations demonstrated clearly that the false stem and leaves grow continuously from emergence in September to senescence in April-May; the corm retains its tuberous roots during winter senescence, and is genetically preprogrammed to shoot in September. Flowers may emerge throughout the growing season (not only initially prior to shoot emergence), typical leaf count is 11-15, not 6-8 as previously reported, numbers that remain constant even when the plant height increases by 20- 30% under shade, and leaf distichy is independent of the sun’s course and is unaffected by mother corm orientation. S. aethiopicus proved to be unusually resistant to common field diseases and pests, and resilient to severe hail. -
Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene Ndhf Thomas J
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 22 | Issue 1 Article 4 2006 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Thomas J. Givnish University of Wisconsin-Madison J. Chris Pires University of Wisconsin-Madison; University of Missouri Sean W. Graham University of British Columbia Marc A. McPherson University of Alberta; Duke University Linda M. Prince Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Gardens See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Givnish, Thomas J.; Pires, J. Chris; Graham, Sean W.; McPherson, Marc A.; Prince, Linda M.; Patterson, Thomas B.; Rai, Hardeep S.; Roalson, Eric H.; Evans, Timothy M.; Hahn, William J.; Millam, Kendra C.; Meerow, Alan W.; Molvray, Mia; Kores, Paul J.; O'Brien, Heath W.; Hall, Jocelyn C.; Kress, W. John; and Sytsma, Kenneth J. (2006) "Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 22: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/4 Phylogenetic Relationships of Monocots Based on the Highly Informative Plastid Gene ndhF Authors Thomas J. Givnish, J. Chris Pires, Sean W. Graham, Marc A. McPherson, Linda M. Prince, Thomas B. Patterson, Hardeep S. Rai, Eric H. Roalson, Timothy M. Evans, William J. Hahn, Kendra C. Millam, Alan W. Meerow, Mia Molvray, Paul J. Kores, Heath W. O'Brien, Jocelyn C. Hall, W. John Kress, and Kenneth J. Sytsma This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol22/iss1/ 4 Aliso 22, pp. -
Comparisons of Invasive Plants in Southern Africa Originating from Southern Temperate, Northern Temperate and Tropical Regions
Bothalia 36,2: 201-222 (2006) Comparisons of invasive plants in southern Africa originating from southern temperate, northern temperate and tropical regions L. HENDERSON* Keywords: alien invasive plants, comparisons, southern Africa, temperate and tropical origins ABSTRACT A subset o f invasive alien plant species in southern Africa was analysed in terms o f their history o f introduction, rate of spread, countries/region o f origin, taxonomy, growth forms, cultivated uses, weed status and current distribution in southern Africa, and comparisons made o f those originating from south o f the tropic o f Capricorn, north o f the tropic o f Cancer and from the tropics. The subset o f 233 species, belonging to 58 families, includes all important declared species and some po tentially important species. Almost as many species originate from temperate regions (112) as from the tropics (121). Most southern temperate species came from Australia (28/36), most tropical species from tropical America (92/121) and most northern temperate species from Europe (including the Mediterranean) and Asia (58/76). Transformers account for 33% o f all species. More transformers are of tropical origin (36) than o f northern temperate (24) and southern temperate origin (18). However. 50% of southern temperate species are transformers, compared to 32% o f northern temperate and 29% of tropical species. Southern temperate transformer species are mainly woody trees and shrubs that were established on a grand scale as silvicultural crops, barriers (hedges, windbreaks and screens) and cover/binders. Most aquatics, herbs, climbers and succulent shrubs an. trom the tropics. Ornamentals are the single largest category o f plants from all three regions, the tropics having contributed twice as many species as temperate regions. -
Flowering Plants of Africa
Flowering Plants of Africa A magazine containing colour plates with descriptions of flowering plants of Africa and neighbouring islands Edited by G. Germishuizen with assistance of E. du Plessis and G.S. Condy Volume 60 Pretoria 2007 Editorial Board B.J. Huntley formerly South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA G.Ll. Lucas Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK B. Mathew Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK Referees and other co-workers on this volume C. Archer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA H. Beentje, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK C.L. Bredenkamp, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA P.V. Bruyns, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, RSA P. Chesselet, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France C. Craib, Bryanston, RSA A.P. Dold, Botany Department, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, RSA G.D. Duncan, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA V.A. Funk, Department of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, USA P. Goldblatt, Missouri Botanical Garden, St Louis, Missouri, USA S. Hammer, Sphaeroid Institute, Vista USA C. Klak, Department of Botany, University of Cape Town, RSA M. Koekemoer, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA O.A. Leistner, c/o South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA S. Liede-Schumann, Department of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Germany J.C. Manning, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA D.C.H. Plowes, Mutare, Zimbabwe E. Retief, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, RSA S.J. Siebert, Department of Botany, University of Zululand, KwaDlangezwa, RSA D.A. Snijman, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Cape Town, RSA C.D. -
Tanzania Wildlife Tour Botanical Birdwatching Butterfly
Tanzania Flora & Fauna of the Southern Highlands A Greentours Tour Report 16th – 31st January 2012 Led by Phil Benstead & Rosalind Salter 17/1 Dar es Salaam The group arrived after an overnight flight in reasonable shape to be met by Rondi, who had arrived in Dar es Salaam ahead of the team to sort out a research permit (for independent work to be conducted in Kitulo National Park after the tour). We made our way to the Mediterraneo Hotel, although somewhat slowly, due to the usual morning rush hour (or 3!) made infinitely worse by policemen taking over the traffic lights. After a short wait on the pleasantly breezy sea front, overlooking Msasani bay, we got into our rooms to freshen up. We then embarked our boat from the beach in front of the hotel, destination Bongoyo Island. Sadly, to very soon be limping back to shore due to engine failure. This was not a problem though, we were told by the boatmen, because there was another boat... So off they went to get a new boat and outboard motor...they returned, and we were off again, but disappointingly for the boat to again come spluttering to a halt. The island sat temptingly out of reach. We were out of options so we had a leisurely lunch of fish and chips (minus the head and tail which we would have got on the island) and then contented ourselves with a chance to walk the beach at low tide. It wasn’t our day as the low tide was badly affected by the onshore winds and so never got low enough to expose the mud and sandflats that are famous for the shorebirds, including the peerless crab plover. -
An Annotated Checklist of the Coastal Forests of Kenya, East Africa
A peer-reviewed open-access journal PhytoKeys 147: 1–191 (2020) Checklist of coastal forests of Kenya 1 doi: 10.3897/phytokeys.147.49602 CHECKLIST http://phytokeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research An annotated checklist of the coastal forests of Kenya, East Africa Veronicah Mutele Ngumbau1,2,3,4, Quentin Luke4, Mwadime Nyange4, Vincent Okelo Wanga1,2,3, Benjamin Muema Watuma1,2,3, Yuvenalis Morara Mbuni1,2,3,4, Jacinta Ndunge Munyao1,2,3, Millicent Akinyi Oulo1,2,3, Elijah Mbandi Mkala1,2,3, Solomon Kipkoech1,2,3, Malombe Itambo4, Guang-Wan Hu1,2, Qing-Feng Wang1,2 1 CAS Key Laboratory of Plant Germplasm Enhancement and Specialty Agriculture, Wuhan Botanical Gar- den, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China 2 Sino-Africa Joint Research Center (SA- JOREC), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, China 3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 4 East African Herbarium, National Museums of Kenya, P. O. Box 45166 00100, Nairobi, Kenya Corresponding author: Guang-Wan Hu ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Herendeen | Received 23 December 2019 | Accepted 17 March 2020 | Published 12 May 2020 Citation: Ngumbau VM, Luke Q, Nyange M, Wanga VO, Watuma BM, Mbuni YuM, Munyao JN, Oulo MA, Mkala EM, Kipkoech S, Itambo M, Hu G-W, Wang Q-F (2020) An annotated checklist of the coastal forests of Kenya, East Africa. PhytoKeys 147: 1–191. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.147.49602 Abstract The inadequacy of information impedes society’s competence to find out the cause or degree of a prob- lem or even to avoid further losses in an ecosystem. -
Taxonomic Studies and Three New Records on Genus Geostachys (Baker) Ridl
BIODIVERSITAS ISSN: 1412-033X Volume 22, Number 7, July 2021 E-ISSN: 2085-4722 Pages: 3057-3067 DOI: 10.13057/biodiv/d220760 Taxonomic studies and three new records on genus Geostachys (Baker) Ridl. in Thailand PIYAPORN SAENSOUK1, SURAPON SAENSOUK2, 1Plant and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Its Applications Unit Group, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Mahasarakham University, Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand 2Plant and Invertebrate Taxonomy and Its Applications Unit Group, Walai Rukhavej Botanical Research Institute, Mahasarakham University. Kantarawichai District, Maha Sarakham, 44150, Thailand. ♥email: [email protected] Manuscript received: 30 April 2021. Revision accepted: 30 June 2021. Abstract. Saensouk P, Saensouk S. 2021. Taxonomic studies and three new records on genus Geostachys (Baker) Ridl. in Thailand. Biodiversitas 22: 3057-3067. A comprehensive taxonomic study and three new records of genus Geostachys (Baker) Ridl. in Thailand have not been reported. This research aimed to study the taxonomical aspect of the genus Geostachys in Thailand based on herbarium collections, fresh materials, and available literatures. Nine species of Geostachys have been recognized with their updated nomenclature in Thailand, namely G. angustifolia K. Larsen, G. chayanii Mayoe, G. decurvata (Baker) Ridl., G. holttumii K. Larsen, G. kerrii K. Larsen, G. penangensis Ridl., G. pierreana Gagnep., G. smitinandii K. Larsen, and. G. tratensis Picheans. & Mayoe. Three species, namely G. decurvata, G. pierreana, and G. penangensis are found to be new records to Thailand. Six species, namely G. angustifolia, G. chayanii, G. holttumii, G. kerrii, G. smitinandii, and G. tratensis were endemic to Thailand. The identification key to species, detailed descriptions, photographs, vernacular name, geographical distribution, ecology, phenology, conservation status, and taxonomic notes have been provided. -
Vessels in Zingiberaceae
IAWA Journal, Vol. 21 (1), 2000: 61–76 VESSELS IN ZINGIBERACEAE: A LIGHT, SCANNING, AND TRANSMISSION MICROSCOPE STUDY by Jennifer A. Thorsch Department of Ecology Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, U.S.A. SUMMARY The Zingiberales is a tropical group of monocotyledons that includes eight recognized families. The order is considered by most taxono- mists and phylogenists to be a monophyletic lineage of plants, but the phylogenetic relationships among genera are not clearly understood. The tracheary elements in the family Zingiberaceae were examined to characterize the diversity of structure and to better understand the phylo- genetic relationships among related taxa. The distribution and speciali- zation of tracheary elements in roots, stems and leaves of 54 species representing 25 genera were studied. Vessel elements were present in roots of all but one of the species examined, Plagiostachys philippinen- sis. Stems and leaves had only tracheids except for Aulotandra kamerun- ensis, which had vessels with simple perforation plates. The perforation plates and lateral walls of vessel elements were examined for the pres- ence of pit membranes or their remnants with both scanning and trans- mission electron microscopy. The presence and condition of pit mem- branes depended upon the developmental stage, but the perforation plates of mature vessel elements lacked pit membranes entirely. Key words: Zingiberaceae, vessel specialization, pit membranes. INTRODUCTION In the late 1930ʼs, Dr. Vernon I. Cheadle began his studies of tracheary elements in monocotyledons. His research and numerous published papers (Cheadle 1942, 1953; Cheadle & Kosakai 1980; Thorsch & Cheadle 1996) have been based on dozens of monocotyledon families.