DOCSLIB.ORG

The Rotation Rate Distribution of Small Near-Earth

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Rotation Rate Distribution of Small Near-Earth THE ROTATION RATE DISTRIBUTION OF SMALL NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS A thesis presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science Desire´e Cotto-Figueroa November 2008 c 2008 Desire´e Cotto-Figueroa. All Rights Reserved. This thesis titled THE ROTATION RATE DISTRIBUTION OF SMALL NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS by DESIREE´ COTTO-FIGUEROA has been approved for the Department of Physics and Astronomy and the College of Arts and Sciences by Thomas S. Statler Professor of Physics and Astronomy Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences Abstract 3 COTTO-FIGUEROA, DESIREE,´ M.S., November 2008, Physics and Astronomy The Rotation Rate Distribution of Small Near-Earth Asteroids (101 pp.) Director of Thesis: Thomas S. Statler Rotation periods or lower limits for 34 Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) were ob- tained through optical light curves. Two codes were developed in order to obtain the true fraction of Fast-Rotating Asteroids (FRAs), F, using Fortran 95 and IDL. The first code models the shape of an asteroid and simulates its light curve. The second code, uses the results obtained from the observational program and the simulated light curves to obtain the probability density of F, P(F ). The observational and sta- tistical analysis indicates that the population of asteroids with D<150m is almost equally divided between fast and slow rotators, and that the majority of the popula- tion of asteroids with D>150m consists of slow-rotators. These results also indicate that selection effects have significantly influenced the currently known distribution of rotation periods of NEAs and therefore that it is not representative of the real population of NEAs. Approved: Thomas S. Statler Professor of Physics and Astronomy 4 To my husband Jos´e and our families. Acknowledgments First, I would like to acknowledge and thank my advisor, Thomas S. Statler, for all of his support and advice during the completion of this thesis. I would also like to thank the other members of my thesis defense committee, Alexander Nieman and Joseph C. Shields, for their helpful suggestions. I would also like to thank David Riethmiller for all of his hard work and contributions to this research. Furthermore I would like to thank Jess Wilhelm, Tomomi Watanabe, and Cristopher Haas for their help with the observations. A special thanks to Mangala Sharma, Kellen Murphy, Brett Ragozzine, Kyle Uckert, Sajida Khan, all of my friends and everyone else who supported or helped me in any way. Finally, I would like to thank my husband and our families for their endless love, support, and encouragement. 6 Table of Contents Page Abstract...................................... 3 Dedication..................................... 4 Acknowledgments................................. 5 ListofFigures................................... 8 ListofTables................................... 10 1 Introduction.................................. 11 1.1Near-EarthAsteroids........................... 11 1.2 The Rotation Rate Distribution of NEAs . 17 1.3TheYORPeffect............................. 23 2 ObservationalProgram............................ 28 2.1Data.................................... 28 2.2Reductions................................. 34 2.3LightCurves................................ 36 3 ModelingLightCurves............................ 39 3.1Introduction................................ 39 3.2TACO................................... 40 3.2.1 CodeDescription......................... 40 3.2.2 Gaussian Random Spheres . 41 3.2.3 BidirectionalReflectance..................... 43 3.2.4 HapkeParameters........................ 48 3.2.5 LibraryofSimulatedLightCurves............... 50 3.3SALSA................................... 56 4 ResultsandDiscussions............................ 59 4.1LightCurves................................ 59 4.2 Rotation Rate Distribution of Small NEAs . 63 4.3TruefractionofFRAs.......................... 69 4.4Discussion................................. 72 5 ConclusionsandFutureWork........................ 75 Bibliography.................................... 78 7 A Light Curves of NEAs . 84 8 List of Figures 1.1 The orbits of the three classes of NEAs: Amors, Apollos and Atens. 12 1.2 The orbits of the major planets and the location of asteroids. 16 1.3 The rubble pile asteroid 25143 Itokawa . 17 1.4 The Rotation Rate Distribution for Solar System Bodies. 18 1.5Thespinlimits............................... 20 1.6TheYarvkoskyeffect............................ 24 1.7TheYORPeffect............................. 27 1.8Radiationforces.............................. 27 2.1Anexampleofareduceddataimage................... 35 3.1Gaussianrandomspheres......................... 42 3.2Bidirectionalreflectance. ........................ 44 3.3Correctionformacroscopicroughness................... 47 3.4Uniformdistributionofpointsonasphere................ 51 3.5Object1.................................. 52 3.6LightcurveforObject1inFigure3.5.................. 52 3.7Object2.................................. 53 3.8LightcurveforObject2inFigure3.7.................. 53 3.9Object1atadifferentorientation.................... 54 3.10LightcurveforObject1inFigure3.9 ................. 54 3.11Object2atadifferentorientation.................... 55 3.12LightcurveforObject2inFigure3.11................. 55 3.13 Light curve for one single rotation of a simulated Object . 58 3.14 Light curve in Figure 3.13 after been processed with SALSA. 58 4.1 Light curve for 2008 CP . 60 4.2 Light curve for 2006 CL9. ........................ 61 4.3 Light curve for 2006 CL9 folded to the derived period. 61 4.4 Light curve for 2007 CQ5. ........................ 62 4.5 Distribution of NEAs with our results . 65 4.6 Probability density for the true fraction of FRAs . 71 A.1 Light curve for 2006 CL9. ........................ 84 A.2 Light curve for 2006 CN10......................... 85 A.3 Light curve for 2006 CY10......................... 85 A.4 Light curve for 2005 YT55......................... 86 A.5 Light curve for 2006 CL10. ........................ 86 A.6 Light curve for 2006 BN55......................... 87 A.7 Light curve for 2006 UQ17......................... 87 A.8 Light curve for 2006 PA1. ........................ 88 9 A.9 Light curve for 2006 WU29. ....................... 88 A.10 Light curve for 2006 UN216. ....................... 89 A.11 Light curve for 2006 YU1. ........................ 89 A.12 Light curve for 2007 DB61......................... 90 A.13 Light curve for 2007 CQ5. ........................ 90 A.14 Light curve for 2007 DD. 91 A.15 Light curve for 2007 DW. 91 A.16 Light curve for 2006 VC. 92 A.17 Light curve for 2006 VD13......................... 92 A.18 Light curve for 2007 CO26......................... 93 A.19 Light curve for 2007 DF8. ........................ 93 A.20 Light curve for 2007 AH12......................... 94 A.21 Light curve for 2007 DD49......................... 94 A.22 Light curve for 2007 DY40......................... 95 A.23 Light curve for 2007 DS84. ........................ 95 A.24 Light curve for 2007 EV. 96 A.25 Light curve for 2007 EF. 96 A.26 Light curve for 2007 EQ. 97 A.27 Light curve for 2007 WF55......................... 97 A.28 Light curve for 2008 AF4. ........................ 98 A.29 Light curve for 2007 PS9.......................... 98 A.30 Light curve for 2007 TU24......................... 99 A.31 Light curve for 2006 JY25. ........................ 99 A.32 Light curve for 2008 CC71......................... 100 A.33 Light curve for 2008 CP. 100 A.34 Light curve for 2008 CR116. ....................... 101 10 List of Tables 1.1 Classes of NEAs . 12 2.1 Orbital parameters of NEAs and Observational circumstances. 30 2.1 Orbital parameters of NEAs and Observational circumstances. 31 2.1 Orbital parameters of NEAs and Observational circumstances. 32 2.1 Orbital parameters of NEAs and Observational circumstances. 33 4.1 Rotation periods or lower limits for each observed NEA . 66 4.1 Rotation periods or lower limits for each observed NEA . 67 4.1 Rotation periods or lower limits for each observed NEA . 68 11 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Near-Earth Asteroids Asteroids are rocky and metallic objects, left over pieces from the formation of the solar system about 4.6 billion years ago. Almost two hundred thousand asteroids have been discovered within the solar system and the vast majority is found within the main belt between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) are asteroids with perihelion1 distance less than 1.3 astronomical units (AU )2.There are three classes of NEAs: the Amors, the Apollos and the Atens (see Figure 1.1). NEAs are categorized into these classes according to their orbital semi-major axis and their perihelion and aphelion3 distances (see Table 1.1). The typical lifetime of a NEA is about ten million years (Gladman et al. 2000). NEAs eventually get destroyed by a collision with an inner planet, are ejected from our Solar System or end up in a Sun-grazing state. As their typical lifetime is less than the age of our Solar System, it is thought that NEAs are objects from the main belt constantly delivered to their current orbits by various mechanisms. Bottke et al. (2002) estimated that the replenishment rate from the main belt, in order to have 1The perihelion is the point in the orbit where the object is closest to the Sun. 2The mean distance from the Earth to the Sun is one astronomical unit. 1AU =1.5x1011m 3The aphelion is the point in the orbit where the object is furthest from
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-Rex Imaging and Thermal Analysis
    ARTICLES https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0731-1 Properties of rubble-pile asteroid (101955) Bennu from OSIRIS-REx imaging and thermal analysis D. N. DellaGiustina 1,26*, J. P. Emery 2,26*, D. R. Golish1, B. Rozitis3, C. A. Bennett1, K. N. Burke 1, R.-L. Ballouz 1, K. J. Becker 1, P. R. Christensen4, C. Y. Drouet d’Aubigny1, V. E. Hamilton 5, D. C. Reuter6, B. Rizk 1, A. A. Simon6, E. Asphaug1, J. L. Bandfield 7, O. S. Barnouin 8, M. A. Barucci 9, E. B. Bierhaus10, R. P. Binzel11, W. F. Bottke5, N. E. Bowles12, H. Campins13, B. C. Clark7, B. E. Clark14, H. C. Connolly Jr. 15, M. G. Daly 16, J. de Leon 17, M. Delbo’18, J. D. P. Deshapriya9, C. M. Elder19, S. Fornasier9, C. W. Hergenrother1, E. S. Howell1, E. R. Jawin20, H. H. Kaplan5, T. R. Kareta 1, L. Le Corre 21, J.-Y. Li21, J. Licandro17, L. F. Lim6, P. Michel 18, J. Molaro21, M. C. Nolan 1, M. Pajola 22, M. Popescu 17, J. L. Rizos Garcia 17, A. Ryan18, S. R. Schwartz 1, N. Shultz1, M. A. Siegler21, P. H. Smith1, E. Tatsumi23, C. A. Thomas24, K. J. Walsh 5, C. W. V. Wolner1, X.-D. Zou21, D. S. Lauretta 1 and The OSIRIS-REx Team25 Establishing the abundance and physical properties of regolith and boulders on asteroids is crucial for understanding the for- mation and degradation mechanisms at work on their surfaces. Using images and thermal data from NASA’s Origins, Spectral Interpretation, Resource Identification, and Security-Regolith Explorer (OSIRIS-REx) spacecraft, we show that asteroid (101955) Bennu’s surface is globally rough, dense with boulders, and low in albedo.
    [Show full text]
  • (155140) 2005 UD and (3200) Phaethon*
    The Planetary Science Journal, 1:15 (15pp), 2020 June https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/ab8e45 © 2020. The Author(s). Published by the American Astronomical Society. New Evidence for a Physical Link between Asteroids (155140) 2005 UD and (3200) Phaethon* Maxime Devogèle1 , Eric MacLennan2, Annika Gustafsson3 , Nicholas Moskovitz1 , Joey Chatelain4, Galin Borisov5,6, Shinsuke Abe7, Tomoko Arai8, Grigori Fedorets2,9, Marin Ferrais10,11,12, Mikael Granvik2,13 , Emmanuel Jehin10, Lauri Siltala2,14, Mikko Pöntinen2, Michael Mommert1 , David Polishook15, Brian Skiff1, Paolo Tanga16, and Fumi Yoshida8 1 Lowell Observatory, 1400 W. Mars Hill Rd., Flagstaff, AZ 86001, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Physics, P.O. Box 64, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland 3 Department of Astronomy & Planetary Science, Northern Arizona University, P.O. Box 6010, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA 4 Las Cumbres Observatory, CA, USA 5 Armagh Observatory and Planetarium, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG, UK 6 Institute of Astronomy and National Astronomical Observatory, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 72, Tsarigradsko Chaussèe Blvd., Sofia BG-1784, Bulgaria 7 Aerospace Engineering, Nihon University, 7-24-1 Narashinodai, Funabashi, Chiba 2748501, Japan 8 Planetary Exploration Research Center, Chiba Institute of Technology, Narashino, Japan 9 Astrophysics Research Centre, School of Mathematics and Physics, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK 10 Space sciences, Technologies & Astrophysics Research (STAR) Institute University of Liège Allée du 6 Août 19, B-4000 Liège, Belgium 11 Aix Marseille Université, CNRS, LAM (Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille) UMR 7326, F-13388, Marseille, France 12 Space sciences, Technologies, France 13 Division of Space Technology, LuleåUniversity of Technology, Box 848, SE-98128 Kiruna, Sweden 14 Nordic Optical Telescope, Apartado 474, E-38700 S/C de La Palma, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain 15 Faculty of Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Opposition and Tilt Effects of Saturn's Rings from HST Observations
    The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations Heikki Salo, Richard G. French To cite this version: Heikki Salo, Richard G. French. The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observa- tions. Icarus, Elsevier, 2010, 210 (2), pp.785. 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002. hal-00693815 HAL Id: hal-00693815 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00693815 Submitted on 3 May 2012 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Accepted Manuscript The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations Heikki Salo, Richard G. French PII: S0019-1035(10)00274-5 DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002 Reference: YICAR 9498 To appear in: Icarus Received Date: 30 March 2009 Revised Date: 2 July 2010 Accepted Date: 2 July 2010 Please cite this article as: Salo, H., French, R.G., The opposition and tilt effects of Saturn’s rings from HST observations, Icarus (2010), doi: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.07.002 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Extended Mission Orbit #2 (XMO2, ~1500 Km Altitude)
    Carol A. Raymond Deputy Principal Investigator SBAG 17 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Caltech 13 Jun 2017 • Spacecraft and instruments are healthy and data return has been excellent to date • Primary mission ended on June 30 2016. All mission objectives and Level-1 requirements were met. • Extended mission at Ceres ends June 30 2017. All mission objectives and Level-1 requirements were met. • Primary mission data archive complete pending ongoing review; extended mission archive is up to date • NASA is considering options for continued operations beyond June 2017 2 • Loss of third reaction wheel on April 23rd limits Dawn’s lifetime – but otherwise does not affect the mission – dependent on hydrazine jets for attitude control – Lifetime decreases with orbit altitude • Dawn is currently in a ~20000x50000 km eccentric orbit • Recently performed opposition observation • Four special journal issues in work: – Icarus: Geological Mapping (in revision) – Icarus: Mineralogical Mapping (submitted) – MAPS: Composition/Crosscutting (in submission) – Icarus: Occator Crater (in progress) – Interest in a special issue on ground ice: contact Britney Schmidt if you would like to participate 3 Ceres Extended Mission Timeline Start of End of End of Extended Mission Extended Mission Project Operations Operations XM1 Science Plan Extended Mission Orbit #1 (XMO1, ~385 km altitude) • Obtain IR spectra of high-priority targets (VIR) ✓ • Expand high-resolution color imaging (FC) ✓ • Improve elemental mapping (GRaND) ✓ • Expand high-resolution surface coverage for topography
    [Show full text]
  • March 21–25, 2016
    FORTY-SEVENTH LUNAR AND PLANETARY SCIENCE CONFERENCE PROGRAM OF TECHNICAL SESSIONS MARCH 21–25, 2016 The Woodlands Waterway Marriott Hotel and Convention Center The Woodlands, Texas INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT Universities Space Research Association Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration CONFERENCE CO-CHAIRS Stephen Mackwell, Lunar and Planetary Institute Eileen Stansbery, NASA Johnson Space Center PROGRAM COMMITTEE CHAIRS David Draper, NASA Johnson Space Center Walter Kiefer, Lunar and Planetary Institute PROGRAM COMMITTEE P. Doug Archer, NASA Johnson Space Center Nicolas LeCorvec, Lunar and Planetary Institute Katherine Bermingham, University of Maryland Yo Matsubara, Smithsonian Institute Janice Bishop, SETI and NASA Ames Research Center Francis McCubbin, NASA Johnson Space Center Jeremy Boyce, University of California, Los Angeles Andrew Needham, Carnegie Institution of Washington Lisa Danielson, NASA Johnson Space Center Lan-Anh Nguyen, NASA Johnson Space Center Deepak Dhingra, University of Idaho Paul Niles, NASA Johnson Space Center Stephen Elardo, Carnegie Institution of Washington Dorothy Oehler, NASA Johnson Space Center Marc Fries, NASA Johnson Space Center D. Alex Patthoff, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Cyrena Goodrich, Lunar and Planetary Institute Elizabeth Rampe, Aerodyne Industries, Jacobs JETS at John Gruener, NASA Johnson Space Center NASA Johnson Space Center Justin Hagerty, U.S. Geological Survey Carol Raymond, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Lindsay Hays, Jet Propulsion Laboratory Paul Schenk,
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of the 50Th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO)
    Abstracts of the 50th DDA Meeting (Boulder, CO) American Astronomical Society June, 2019 100 — Dynamics on Asteroids break-up event around a Lagrange point. 100.01 — Simulations of a Synthetic Eurybates 100.02 — High-Fidelity Testing of Binary Asteroid Collisional Family Formation with Applications to 1999 KW4 Timothy Holt1; David Nesvorny2; Jonathan Horner1; Alex B. Davis1; Daniel Scheeres1 Rachel King1; Brad Carter1; Leigh Brookshaw1 1 Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder 1 Centre for Astrophysics, University of Southern Queensland (Boulder, Colorado, United States) (Longmont, Colorado, United States) 2 Southwest Research Institute (Boulder, Connecticut, United The commonly accepted formation process for asym- States) metric binary asteroids is the spin up and eventual fission of rubble pile asteroids as proposed by Walsh, Of the six recognized collisional families in the Jo- Richardson and Michel (Walsh et al., Nature 2008) vian Trojan swarms, the Eurybates family is the and Scheeres (Scheeres, Icarus 2007). In this theory largest, with over 200 recognized members. Located a rubble pile asteroid is spun up by YORP until it around the Jovian L4 Lagrange point, librations of reaches a critical spin rate and experiences a mass the members make this family an interesting study shedding event forming a close, low-eccentricity in orbital dynamics. The Jovian Trojans are thought satellite. Further work by Jacobson and Scheeres to have been captured during an early period of in- used a planar, two-ellipsoid model to analyze the stability in the Solar system. The parent body of the evolutionary pathways of such a formation event family, 3548 Eurybates is one of the targets for the from the moment the bodies initially fission (Jacob- LUCY spacecraft, and our work will provide a dy- son and Scheeres, Icarus 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • A Tale of Two Sides: Pluto's Opposition Surge in 2018 and 2019
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 14, EPSC2020-546, 2020, updated on 27 Sep 2021 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-546 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. A Tale of Two Sides: Pluto's Opposition Surge in 2018 and 2019 Anne Verbiscer1, Paul Helfenstein2, Mark Showalter3, and Marc Buie4 1University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA ([email protected]) 2Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA ([email protected]) 3SETI Institute, Mountain View, CA, USA ([email protected]) 4Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA ([email protected]) Near-opposition photometry employs remote sensing observations to reveal the microphysical properties of regolith-covered surfaces over a wide range of solar system bodies. When aligned directly opposite the Sun, objects exhibit an opposition effect, or surge, a dramatic, non-linear increase in reflectance seen with decreasing solar phase angle (the Sun-target-observer angle). This phenomenon is a consequence of both interparticle shadow hiding and a constructive interference phenomenon known as coherent backscatter [1-3]. While the size of the Earth’s orbit restricts observations of Pluto and its moons to solar phase angles no larger than α = 1.9°, the opposition surge, which occurs largely at α < 1°, can discriminate surface properties [4-6]. The smallest solar phase angles are attainable at node crossings when the Earth transits the solar disk as viewed from the object. In this configuration, a solar system body is at “true” opposition. When combined with observations acquired at larger phase angles, the resulting reflectance measurement can be related to the optical, structural, and thermal properties of the regolith and its inferred collisional history.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Dust Particles Ejected by Catastrophic Asteroidal Disruptions
    EVOLUTION OF DUST PARTICLES EJECTED BY CATASTROPHIC ASTEROIDAL DISRUPTIONS Thomas Kehoe, Stanley Dermott, Ashley Espy Department of Astronomy, University of Florida The contribution of asteroidal dust to the zodiacal cloud has previously been discussed in terms of a collisional cascade process, whereby dust is produced by the grinding down of large objects. However, there is now evidence that debris disks, such as the zodiacal cloud, are refreshed stochastically by the injection of dust produced by the catastrophic collisional breakup of a large planetesimal. Asteroid families provide dramatic proof of the occurrence of such collisions in the solar system. There are now known to be at least two examples of asteroids, tens to hundreds of kilometers in diameter, that have been catastrophically disrupted by an impact within the last ten million years. These collisional events resulted in the creation of the Veritas family and the Karin cluster. Enormous quantities of dust are injected into the zodiacal cloud following such family-forming impact events and the remnants of the collisional debris produced by these disruptions can still be observed today in the form of dust bands. Following its production, this material evolves both dynamically and collisionally, with the result that a wave of dust particles is transported from its source region in the asteroid belt into the inner solar system Evidence shows that many asteroids are not coherent, solid bodies but are instead highly fractured, highly porous, and only loosely bound by gravity. Dust may be generated by im- pact processes in the regoliths of such ”rubble piles” and so the contribution of asteroidal dust to the zodiacal cloud may be determined by a quite different mechanism to the col- lisional cascade process, with only a few rubble piles providing the majority of asteroidal dust in the solar system at any particular epoch.
    [Show full text]
  • Orders of Magnitude (Length) - Wikipedia
    03/08/2018 Orders of magnitude (length) - Wikipedia Orders of magnitude (length) The following are examples of orders of magnitude for different lengths. Contents Overview Detailed list Subatomic Atomic to cellular Cellular to human scale Human to astronomical scale Astronomical less than 10 yoctometres 10 yoctometres 100 yoctometres 1 zeptometre 10 zeptometres 100 zeptometres 1 attometre 10 attometres 100 attometres 1 femtometre 10 femtometres 100 femtometres 1 picometre 10 picometres 100 picometres 1 nanometre 10 nanometres 100 nanometres 1 micrometre 10 micrometres 100 micrometres 1 millimetre 1 centimetre 1 decimetre Conversions Wavelengths Human-defined scales and structures Nature Astronomical 1 metre Conversions https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orders_of_magnitude_(length) 1/44 03/08/2018 Orders of magnitude (length) - Wikipedia Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 decametre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 hectometre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Nature Astronomical 1 kilometre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 10 kilometres Conversions Sports Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 100 kilometres Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 1 megametre Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Sports Geographical Astronomical 10 megametres Conversions Human-defined scales and structures Geographical Astronomical 100 megametres 1 gigametre
    [Show full text]
  • Is Asteroid 2002Ny40 a Rubble Pile Gravitationally Disrupted? J
    Lunar and Planetary Science XXXIX (2008) 1692.pdf IS ASTEROID 2002NY40 A RUBBLE PILE GRAVITATIONALLY DISRUPTED? J. M. Trigo-Rodríguez1,2, W.F. Bottke3, A. Campo Bagatin4, P. Tanga5, J. Llorca6, D.C. Jones7, I.P. Williams7, J.M. Madiedo8, and E. Lyytinen9. 1Institute of Space Sciences (CSIC). Campus UAB, Facultat de Ciències, Torre C5-2ª planta. 08193 Bellaterra, Spain; 2Institut d’Estudis Espacials de Catalunya. Gran Capità 2-4, Ed. Nexus. 08034 Bar- celona, Spain; 3 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA; 4 Universidad de Alicante, Spain; 5 Obser- vatoire de Nice, France; 6 Institut de Tècniques Energètiques, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC), Barce- lona; 7 Astronomy Unit, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom; 8 Facultad de Ciencias, Uni- versidad de Huelva, Spain; 9 Finish Fireball Network, Kehäkukantie 3B, 00720 Helsinki, Finland. Introduction: The existence of meteoroid streams Results and discussion: Due to the relative low containing meter-sized meteoroids capable of produc- population of the NEO region, a collision among as- ing meteorites after atmospheric interaction was pro- teroids is an unlikely, but not negligible process for posed quite recently [1]. Their existence has important producing the observed asteroidal fragments. In any implications because they can be naturally delivering case, we have searched for alternative processes capa- to the Earth different types of rock-forming materials ble of producing the meteoroid stream. a) One option from Potentially Hazardous Asteroids (PHA). would be that the meteoroids were ejected by a fast rotator, unlikely according to the present spin of both The recent identification of Near Earth Object asteroids, but not taking into account the YORP effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Asteroids Do Have Satellites 289
    Merline et al.: Asteroids Do Have Satellites 289 Asteroids Do Have Satellites William J. Merline Southwest Research Institute Stuart J. Weidenschilling Planetary Science Institute Daniel D. Durda Southwest Research Institute Jean-Luc Margot California Institute of Technology Petr Pravec Astronomical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Alex D. Storrs Towson University After years of speculation, satellites of asteroids have now been shown definitively to exist. Asteroid satellites are important in at least two ways: (1) They are a natural laboratory in which to study collisions, a ubiquitous and critically important process in the formation and evolu- tion of the asteroids and in shaping much of the solar system, and (2) their presence allows to us to determine the density of the primary asteroid, something which otherwise (except for certain large asteroids that may have measurable gravitational influence on, e.g., Mars) would require a spacecraft flyby, orbital mission, or sample return. Binaries have now been detected in a variety of dynamical populations, including near-Earth, main-belt, outer main-belt, Tro- jan, and transneptunian regions. Detection of these new systems has been the result of improved observational techniques, including adaptive optics on large telescopes, radar, direct imaging, advanced lightcurve analysis, and spacecraft imaging. Systematics and differences among the observed systems give clues to the formation mechanisms. We describe several processes that may result in binary systems, all of which involve collisions of one type or another, either physi- cal or gravitational. Several mechanisms will likely be required to explain the observations. 1. INTRODUCTION sons between, for example, asteroid taxonomic types and our inventory of meteorites.
    [Show full text]
  • Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem an Application to the Psyche Mission
    Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem An Application to the Psyche Mission Stijn Mast Technische Universiteit Delft Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem Front cover: Artist illustration of the Psyche mission spacecraft orbiting asteroid (16) Psyche. Image courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech. ii Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem An Application to the Psyche Mission by Stijn Mast to obtain the degree of Master of Science at Delft University of Technology, to be defended publicly on Friday August 31, 2018 at 10:00 AM. Student number: 4279425 Project duration: October 2, 2017 – August 31, 2018 Thesis committee: Ir. R. Noomen, TU Delft Dr. D.M. Stam, TU Delft Ir. J.A. Melkert, TU Delft Advisers: Ir. R. Noomen, TU Delft Dr. J.A. Sims, JPL Dr. S. Eggl, JPL Dr. G. Lantoine, JPL An electronic version of this thesis is available at http://repository.tudelft.nl/. Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem This page is intentionally left blank. iv Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem Preface Before you lies the thesis Stable Orbits in the Small-Body Problem: An Application to the Psyche Mission. This thesis has been written to obtain the degree of Master of Science in Aerospace Engineering at Delft University of Technology. Its contents are intended for anyone with an interest in the field of spacecraft trajectory dynamics and stability in the vicinity of small celestial bodies. The methods presented in this thesis have been applied extensively to the Psyche mission. Conse- quently, the work can be of interest to anyone involved in the Psyche mission.
    [Show full text]