UC Santa Barbara Specialist Research Meetings—Papers and Reports

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

UC Santa Barbara Specialist Research Meetings—Papers and Reports Title International Conference on Discrete Global Grids Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4tm0d1jm Author National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis Publication Date 2000-03-01 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California NCGIA International Conference on Discrete Global Grids Introduction This conference, organized by the U.S. National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis (NCGIA) brought researchers together from many different disciplines to share advances in the rapidly developing fields of discrete global grids, global coordinate systems, and global georeferencing, and their applications. Participants were asked to submit position papers along with their application. The conference was held in the Radisson Hotel on the Santa Barbara waterfront from March 26-28, 2000. This document contains: • The original conference announcement • The participant list • All submitted abstracts (and full position papers where applicable) • The conference agenda Original Announcement The ability to specify geographic location is fundamental to many areas of science and many human activities. In addition to latitude/longitude, horizontal/vertical datums and rectangular coordinate systems such as UTM, new approaches to tessellating planets -- often involving triangulations, some of which are hierarchical -- have been developed by researchers in a variety of domains to satisfy a range of scientific objectives. Papers describing some of these efforts have appeared, and conference sessions have been organized to discuss them, but no international conference has yet been convened to specifically address discrete global grids (DGG) either theoretically or from perspectives of applications they can serve. The meeting described in this Call for Papers is intended to fill this void, and all workers in DGG-related areas are strongly encouraged to participate. Many disciplines are interested in methods for gridding the curved surface of the Earth. They include: • Statistics: sampling schemes and statistical models over the Earth's surface; • Geographic information systems and science: georeferencing, data structures and indexing schemes for global data, global visualization, and Digital Earth; • Remote sensing: consistent schemes for global imagery; • Environmental modeling: finite difference and finite element schemes for solution of partial differential equations in global system modeling; • Digital libraries: methods to support search, assessment, and retrieval of global geospatial and georeferenced data from distributed servers. This conference will bring researchers together from many different disciplines to share advances in the rapidly developing fields of discrete global grids, global coordinate systems, and global georeferencing, and their applications. The program will include keynote presentations, contributed papers, demonstrations, and informal discussions. The conference will be held in the Radisson Hotel on the Santa Barbara waterfront. It will begin with a reception and keynote presentation on Sunday evening March 26, and continue through Tuesday March 28, 2000. It is being organized by the Santa Barbara site of the U.S. National Center for Geographic Santa Barbara, CA: March 26-28, 2000 1 NCGIA International Conference on Discrete Global Grids Information and Analysis, by a steering committee chaired by Michael Goodchild (UCSB), and including Noel Cressie (Ohio State), Geoffrey Dutton (Spatial Effects), Nick Faust (Georgia Tech), Ralph Kahn (JPL), Tony Olsen (EPA), Denis White (EPA), Hrvoje Lukatela (Geodyssey), and Jon Kimerling (Oregon State). Papers are invited that address any aspect of global grids. Suitable topics might include, but are not limited to: • Interoperability of and with global grids; compatibility issues for different grid schemes, and global grids as a medium of exchange for geospatial data. • Data quality issues; what kinds of positional error and distortions do different schemes have, what are the consequences, and for whom and why do they matter. • Application of discrete global grid systems in survey designs for environmental and natural resources. • Alternative discrete global grid systems based on platonic polyhedra. • Discrete global grids in atmospheric and ocean modeling. • Spatial analyses using hierarchical structures in discrete global grids. • Graphics and visualization based on discrete global grids. • Efficient addressing schemes for hierarchical discrete global grids. Participants David Ashkenas Ion Mateescu Informix Software Inc. Ctr. for Intl. Earth Science Information Network Columbia University Mary Jo Brodzik National Snow & Ice Data Center, CIRES Karen A. Mulcahy University of Colorado Dept of Geography East Carolina University Earl F. Burkholder Surveying Engineering Dept Val Noronha New Mexico State University Digital Geographic Research Corporation Mississauga, ON Keith C. Clarke CANADA Dept of Geography University of California, Santa Barbara Anthony R. Olsen Natl. Health & Env. Effects Research Lab John Cloud ORD Western Ecology Division Dept of Geography U.S. Environmental Protection Agency University of California, Santa Barbara Dragan Petrovic Peter H. Dana Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Independent consultant Robert G. Raskin Geoffrey H. Dutton Jet Propulsion Laboratory Spatial Effects California Institute of Technology/NASA Nickolas L. Faust Martin Reddy Electro-Optics, Environment & Materials Lab Artificial Intelligence Center Georgia Tech Research Institute SRI International Georgia Institute of Technology Santa Barbara, CA: March 26-28, 2000 2 NCGIA International Conference on Discrete Global Grids Michael W. Freeston Alexandria Digital Library University of California, Santa Barbara Marc Riedo GIS Laboratory/Dept of Rural Engineering Michael F. Goodchild Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Dept of Geography University of California, Santa Barbara John Russell Geodyssey Limited Matt J. Gregory Dept of Geosciences Kevin M. Sahr Oregon State University Dept of Computer Science University of Oregon Lee Hancock Go2 Systems, Inc. Hanan J. Samet Computer Science Dept Jordan T. Hastings University of Maryland Go2 Systems, Inc. Ashton Shortridge Linda L. Hill Dept of Geography Alexandria Digital Library University of California, Santa Barbara University of California, Santa Barbara Dennis R. Smith Ralph Kahn Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology/ NASA Daniel L. Specht Topographic Engineering Center A. Ross Kiester United States Army Forestry Sciences Laboratory U.S. Dept of Agriculture, Forest Service Waldo Tobler Dept of Geography A. Jon Kimerling University of California, Santa Barbara Dept of Geosciences Oregon State University Tom Van Sant Ken Knowles Richard A. White National Snow & Ice Data Center Earth System Science Center University of Colorado Pennsylvania State University Shohaku Ko Amy Yeh Center for Environmental Remote Sensing ZipRealty.com Chiba University, Japan May Yuan Yvan G. Leclerc Dept of Geography Artificial Intelligence Center University of Oklahoma SRI International Simon Zhang Hrvoje Lukatela University of California, Berkeley Geodyssey Limited Santa Barbara, CA: March 26-28, 2000 3 NCGIA International Conference on Discrete Global Grids Position Papers and Abstracts Augmenting SAND with a spherical data model By Houman Alborzi and Hanan Samet Computer Science Department University of Maryland College Park, MD SAND is a spatial database and information browser system developed at University of Maryland which supports 2D and 3D data models. In this abstract we describe our experience in adding a spherical data model to SAND which enables it to perform spatial queries on spherical data and to browse their results in an incremental manner. In particular, we focus on the issues that arise in adding a spherical data model to a database that has been built on the basis of the planar data model. Special emphasis is place on how the data structure were chosen for the task. We also describe the various geometrical primitives that were needed for modeling spherical data as well as the algorithms that were required in our implementation. As SAND is based on the quadtree representation, a natural method for adding spherical data to SAND was to find a spherical adaptation of the quadtree. We mapped the sphere into a quadtree representation by projecting the sphere onto a cube, and then constructed the quadtree on the faces of cube. Alternatively, it is also possible to map the sphere into a plane, and then simply use a planar quadtree. We discuss some of the differences between these approaches. We also describe the display models and visual query mechanisms used in spherical SAND to ease the task of navigating through the data. By adding a spherical sector primitive, we make it possible for users to locate data on the sphere which are around a great circle of the sphere. The same primitive allows users to query the database using a range of view from any point on the sphere. Santa Barbara, CA: March 26-28, 2000 4 NCGIA International Conference on Discrete Global Grids .. National Snow and Ice Data Center World Data Center for Glaciology EASE-Grid A Versatile Set of Introduction Equal-Area Defining a Gridded Data Set EASE-Grid Map Parameters Projections and Why Equal-Area Maps? Grids Why a Spherical Earth Model? EASE-Grid Family of Grid Definitions
Recommended publications
  • The Power of Virtual Globes for Valorising Cultural Heritage and Enabling Sustainable Tourism: Nasa World Wind Applications

    The Power of Virtual Globes for Valorising Cultural Heritage and Enabling Sustainable Tourism: Nasa World Wind Applications

    International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume XL-4/W2, 2013 ISPRS WebMGS 2013 & DMGIS 2013, 11 – 12 November 2013, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, China Topics: Global Spatial Grid & Cloud-based Services THE POWER OF VIRTUAL GLOBES FOR VALORISING CULTURAL HERITAGE AND ENABLING SUSTAINABLE TOURISM: NASA WORLD WIND APPLICATIONS M. A. Brovelli a , P. Hogan b , M. Minghini a , G. Zamboni a a Politecnico di Milano, DICA, Laboratorio di Geomatica, Como Campus, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy - [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] b NASA Ames Research Center, M/S 244-14, Moffett Field, CA USA - [email protected] Commission IV, Working Group IV/5 KEY WORDS: Cultural Heritage, GIS, Three-dimensional, Virtual Globe, Web based ABSTRACT: Inspired by the visionary idea of Digital Earth, as well as from the tremendous improvements in geo-technologies, use of virtual globes has been changing the way people approach to geographic information on the Web. Unlike the traditional 2D-visualization typical of Geographic Information Systems (GIS), virtual globes offer multi-dimensional, fully-realistic content visualization which allows for a much richer user experience. This research investigates the potential for using virtual globes to foster tourism and enhance cultural heritage. The paper first outlines the state of the art for existing virtual globes, pointing out some possible categorizations according to license type, platform-dependence, application type, default layers, functionalities and freedom of customization. Based on this analysis, the NASA World Wind virtual globe is the preferred tool for promoting tourism and cultural heritage.
  • 35 - VGI and Beyond: from Data to Mapping

    35 - VGI and Beyond: from Data to Mapping

    Antoniou, V., Capineri, C. and Haklay, M., 2018. VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping. in: A.J. Kent and P. Vujakovic (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Mapping and Cartography. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 475 - 488 35 - VGI and Beyond: From Data to Mapping Vyron Antoniou, Cristina Capineri and Muki (Mordechai) Haklay This chapter will introduce the concept of Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) within practices of mapping and cartography. Our aim is to provide an accessible overview of the area, which has grown rapidly in the past decade, but first we need to define what we mean by VGI. Defining VGI In a seminal paper published in 2007, Mike Goodchild coined the term Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) in an effort to describe ‘the widespread engagement of large numbers of private citizens, often with little in the way of formal qualifications, in the creation of geographic information’ (Goodchild, 2007: 217). At that point, rudimentary crowdsourced Geographic Information (GI) was created and disseminated freely with the help of innovative desktop applications (e.g. Google Earth) or web-based platforms (e.g. Wikimapia, OpenStreetMap). By crowdsourcing we refer to the action of multiple participants (sometimes thousands or even millions) in the generation of geographical information, when these participants are external to the organization that manages the information and are not formally employed by it. Since then a lot has changed and VGI now has a deep and broad agenda that ranges from implicitly contributed GI through social networks to rigorously-monitored citizen science projects. However, before we continue the discussion on this subject, it is necessary to shed light onto the key factors that have helped to create this phenomenon.
  • Next-Generation Digital Earth

    Next-Generation Digital Earth

    Next-generation Digital Earth Michael F. Goodchilda,1, Huadong Guob, Alessandro Annonic, Ling Biand, Kees de Biee, Frederick Campbellf, Max Cragliac, Manfred Ehlersg, John van Genderene, Davina Jacksonh, Anthony J. Lewisi, Martino Pesaresic, Gábor Remetey-Fülöppj, Richard Simpsonk, Andrew Skidmoref, Changlin Wangb, and Peter Woodgatel aDepartment of Geography, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106; bCenter for Earth Observation and Digital Earth, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100094, China; cJoint Research Centre of the European Commission, 21027 Ispra, Italy; dDepartment of Geography, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY 14261; eFaculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation, University of Twente, 7500 AE, Enschede, The Netherlands; fFred Campbell Consulting, Ottawa, ON, Canada K2H 5G8; gInstitute for Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, University of Osnabrück, 49076 Osnabrück, Germany; hD_City Network, Newtown 2042, Australia; iDepartment of Geography and Anthropology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803; jHungarian Association for Geo-Information, H-1122, Budapest, Hungary; kNextspace, Auckland 1542, New Zealand; and lCooperative Research Center for Spatial Information, Carlton South 3053, Australia Edited by Kenneth Wachter, University of California, Berkeley, CA, and approved May 14, 2012 (received for review March 1, 2012) A speech of then-Vice President Al Gore in 1998 created a vision for a Digital Earth, and played a role in stimulating the development of a first generation of virtual globes, typified by Google Earth, that achieved many but not all the elements of this vision. The technical achievements of Google Earth, and the functionality of this first generation of virtual globes, are reviewed against the Gore vision.
  • Discrete Global Grid Systems to Integrate Statistical and Geospatial Information

    Discrete Global Grid Systems to Integrate Statistical and Geospatial Information

    Discrete Global Grid Systems to integrate statistical and geospatial information Adam Lewis, A/Chief Scientist, Geoscience Australia ([email protected]) with contributions from Matthew Purss, Stuart Minchin, Robert Gibb, Faramarz Samavati, Perry Peterson, Clinton Dow, Jin Ben, Jonathan Ross, Trevor Dhu, Martin Brady UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards Stockholm, Sweden, 6-8 November 2017 Geographical data in official statistics Geographical data has an established role in official statistics, playing a greater or lesser part in some countries and applications than others • US Department of Agriculture and US National Agricultural Statistical Services may be the exemplar • Applies remote sensing and field data in a rigorous process • Appropriate care is needed; e.g., ‘pixel counting’ is not sufficient - estimation biases need to be addressed (which is straightforward) UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards 2017 Geographical data in official statistics Martin Brady, Australian Bureau of Statistics UNECE – Workshop on Integrating Geospatial and Statistical Standards 2017 The role of geospatial data is increasing Frequent observation is the most important factor in useful data “heavy volumes of time series imagery important” (D M Johnson) Weekly, high-quality, operational observation is now a reality through multiple government and commercial systems E.g., over Australia: • Landsat data 1987-2017 ~ 400TB • Sentinel-2 data 2015-2017 ~ 200TB Globally, Sentinel 1 & 2 ~ 10 PB per
  • A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1

    A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1

    A Companion to Contemporary Documentary Filn1 Edited by Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow WI LEY Blackwell 2 o ,�- This edition first published 2015 © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Inc, excepting Chapter 1 © 2014 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota and Chapter 19 © 2007 Wayne State University Press Registered Office John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK Contents Editorial Offices 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, UK The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, UK For details of our global editorial offices,for customer services, and for informationabout how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow to be identifiedas the authors of the editorial material in this work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print Notes on Contributors ix may not be available in electronic books. Introduction: A World Encountered 1 Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners.
  • Research Directions for the Rhealpix Discrete Global Grid System

    Research Directions for the Rhealpix Discrete Global Grid System

    Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada, 2019, 7(6), 2 Research directions for the rHEALPix Discrete Global Grid System DAVID BOWATER EMMANUEL STEFANAKIS Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick University of Calgary [email protected] [email protected] data management (Yao and Lin 2018) and ABSTRACT as the de facto global reference system for geospatial big data (OGC 2017b). Discrete Global Grid Systems (DGGSs) are Over the years, several different important to Digital Earth, the Open DGGSs have been created each with Geospatial Consortium (OGC), and big data advantages and disadvantages. However, research. A promising OGC conformant only a subset are deemed appropriate under quadrilateral-based approach is the the OGC DGGS Abstract Specification (OGC rHEALPix DGGS. Despite its advantages 2017a). Importantly, an OGC conformant over hexagonal- or triangular-based DGGSs, DGGS must utilize a method that partitions little research is being done to explore or the earth’s surface into a uniform grid of advance our understanding of it. In this equal area cells. Currently, the most popular paper, we briefly review existing work and method is the Icosahedral Snyder Equal then present several important directions Area (ISEA) projection and a considerable for future research related to harmonic amount of research has focused on analysis, discrete line generation, pure- and hexagonal- or triangular-based DGGSs that mixed-aperture DGGSs, and DGGS-based adopt this approach. distance/direction metrics. That being said, quadrilateral-based DGGSs have several advantages over 1. Introduction hexagonal-or triangular DGGSs, such as compatibility with existing data structures, hardware, display devices, and coordinate A Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) systems (Sahr et al.
  • Msdiwg7-2.7A

    Msdiwg7-2.7A

    Open Geospatial Consortium Submission Date: 2015-09-30 Approval Date: <yyyy-dd-mm> Publication Date: <yyyy-dd-mm> External identifier of this OGC® document: <http://www.opengis.net/doc/IS/DGGS/1.0> Internal reference number of this OGC® document: 15-104 Version: 1.0.0 Category: OGC® Implementation Standard Editor: Matthew Purss OGC Discrete Global Grid System (DGGS) Core Standard Copyright notice Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium To obtain additional rights of use, visit http://www.opengeospatial.org/legal/. Warning This document is not an OGC Standard. This document is distributed for review and comment. This document is subject to change without notice and may not be referred to as an OGC Standard. Recipients of this document are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to provide supporting documentation. Document type: OGC® Implementation Standard Document subtype: if applicable Document stage: Draft Document language: English 1 Copyright © 2015 Open Geospatial Consortium OGC 15-104r3 License Agreement Permission is hereby granted by the Open Geospatial Consortium, ("Licensor"), free of charge and subject to the terms set forth below, to any person obtaining a copy of this Intellectual Property and any associated documentation, to deal in the Intellectual Property without restriction (except as set forth below), including without limitation the rights to implement, use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, and/or sublicense copies of the Intellectual Property, and to permit persons to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished to do so, provided that all copyright notices on the intellectual property are retained intact and that each person to whom the Intellectual Property is furnished agrees to the terms of this Agreement.
  • 2016 State of Space Report

    2016 State of Space Report

    2016 STATE OF SPACE REPORT A report by the Australian Government Space Coordination Committee space.gov.au © Commonwealth of Australia 2016 Ownership of intellectual property rights Unless otherwise noted, copyright (and any other intellectual property rights, if any) in this publication is owned by the Commonwealth of Australia. Creative Commons licence Attribution CC BY All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, logos, any material protected by trademark or otherwise noted in this publication, and the Commonwealth Coat of Arms. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. A summary of the licence terms is available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/. The full licence terms are available from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode. Content contained herein should be attributed as The Australian Government State of Space Report 2016. This notice excludes the Commonwealth Coat of Arms, any logos and any material protected by trade mark or otherwise noted in the publication, from the application of the Creative Commons licence. These are all forms of property which the Commonwealth cannot or usually would not licence others to use. Disclaimer: The Australian Government as represented by the Department of Industry, Innovation and Science has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Commonwealth of Australia, its officers, employees, or agents disclaim any liability, including liability for negligence, loss howsoever caused, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law.
  • List of Boundary Lines

    List of Boundary Lines

    A M K RESOURCE WORLD GENERAL KNOWLEDGE www.amkresourceinfo.com List of Boundary Lines The line which demarcates the two countries is termed as Boundary Line List of important boundary lines Durand Line is the line demarcating the boundaries of Pakistan and Afghanistan. It was drawn up in 1896 by Sir Mortimer Durand. Hindenburg Line is the boundary dividing Germany and Poland. The Germans retreated to this line in 1917 during World War I Mason-Dixon Line is a line of demarcation between four states in the United State. Marginal Line was the 320-km line of fortification on the Russia-Finland border. Drawn up by General Mannerheim. Macmahon Line was drawn up by Sir Henry MacMahon, demarcating the frontier of India and China. China did not recognize the MacMahon line and crossed it in 1962. Medicine Line is the border between Canada and the United States. Radcliffe Line was drawn up by Sir Cyril Radcliffe, demarcating the boundary between India and Pakistan. Siegfried Line is the line of fortification drawn up by Germany on its border with France.Order-Neisse Line is the border between Poland and Germany, running along the Order and Neisse rivers, adopted at the Poland Conference (Aug 1945) after World War II. 17th Parallel defined the boundary between North Vietnam and South Vietnam before two were united. 24th Parallel is the line which Pakistan claims for demarcation between India and Pakistan. This, however, is not recognized by India 26th Parallel south is a circle of latitude which crosses through Africa, Australia and South America. 30th Parallel north is a line of latitude that stands one-third of the way between the equator and the North Pole.
  • Guide to Apicultural Potential, Climate Conditions, Air and Soil Quality in the Black Sea Basin

    Guide to Apicultural Potential, Climate Conditions, Air and Soil Quality in the Black Sea Basin

    GUIDE TO APICULTURAL POTENTIAL, CLIMATE CONDITIONS, AIR AND SOIL QUALITY IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN COORDINATOR: ADRIAN ZUGRAVU Project: INCREASING THE TRADING AND MODERNIZATION OF THE BEEKEEPING AND THE CONNECTED SECTORS IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN ITM BEE-BSB Regions: South-Eastern Romania Severoiztochen Bulgaria TR90 (Trabzon, Ordu, Giresun, Rize, Artvin, Gümüşhane) Turkey Moldova Mykolaiv – Ukraine ITM BEE-BSB www.itmbeebsb.com 2020 Common borders. Common solutions 0 CONTENTS What is the Black Sea Region Chapter 1 THE IMPORTANCE OF BEEKEEPING AT EUROPEAN LEVEL (Adrian Zugravu, Constanța Laura Augustin Zugravu) Chapter 2 THE APICULTURAL POTENTIAL 2.1 Introductory notes – definitions, classifications, biological diversity, (Ionica Soare) 2.2. Important melliferous plants in terms of beekeeping and geographical distribution (Ionica Soare) 2.2.1 Trees and shrubs (Ionica Soare) 2.2.2 Technical plants crops (Ionica Soare) 2.2.3 Forage crops (Ionica Soare) 2.2.4. Medicinal and aromatic plants (Adrian Zugravu, Ciprian Petrișor Plenovici) 2.2.5 Table of honey plants (Ionica Soare) Chapter 3. CLIMATE CONDITIONS (Ionica Soare) Chapter 4 AIR AND SOIL QUALITY IN THE BLACK SEA BASIN 4.1 The impact of climate change on the environmental resources in the Black Sea Basin (Adrian Zugravu, Camelia Costela Fasola Lungeanu) 4.2 The state of environmental resources in the Black Sea Region (Adrian Zugravu, Camelia Costela Fasola Lungeanu) 4.3 The soil quality in the Black Sea Basin (Adrian Zugravu, Camelia Costela Fasola Lungeanu) 4.4 Actions taken and issues related to soil / land degradation and desertification (Ionica Soare) 4.5 Developments and trends on the market for phytopharmaceutical products Adrian Zugravu, Camelia Costela Fasola Lungeanu) Bibliography Common borders.
  • What3words Geocoding Extensions and Applications for a University Campus

    What3words Geocoding Extensions and Applications for a University Campus

    WHAT3WORDS GEOCODING EXTENSIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS WEN JIANG August 2018 TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 315 WHAT3WORDS GEOCODING EXTENSIONS AND APPLICATIONS FOR A UNIVERSITY CAMPUS Wen Jiang Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering University of New Brunswick P.O. Box 4400 Fredericton, N.B. Canada E3B 5A3 August 2018 © Wen Jiang, 2018 PREFACE This technical report is a reproduction of a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Engineering in the Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering, August 2018. The research was supervised by Dr. Emmanuel Stefanakis, and support was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. As with any copyrighted material, permission to reprint or quote extensively from this report must be received from the author. The citation to this work should appear as follows: Jiang, Wen (2018). What3Words Geocoding Extensions and Applications for a University Campus. M.Sc.E. thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geomatics Engineering Technical Report No. 315, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, 116 pp. ABSTRACT Geocoded locations have become necessary in many GIS analysis, cartography and decision-making workflows. A reliable geocoding system that can effectively return any location on earth with sufficient accuracy is desired. This study is motivated by a need for a geocoding system to support university campus applications. To this end, the existing geocoding systems were examined. Address-based geocoding systems use address-matching method to retrieve geographic locations from postal addresses. They present limitations in locality coverage, input address standardization, and address database maintenance.
  • Review of Digital Globes 2015

    Review of Digital Globes 2015

    A Digital Earth Globe REVIEW OF DIGITAL GLOBES 2015 JESSICA KEYSERS MARCH 2015 ACCESS AND AVAILABILITY The report is available in PDF format at http://www.crcsi.com.au We welcome your comments regarding the readability and usefulness of this report. To provide feedback, please contact us at [email protected] CITING THIS REPORT Keysers, J. H. (2015), ‘Digital Globe Review 2015’. Published by the Australia and New Zea- land Cooperative Research Centre for Spatial Information. ISBN (online) 978-0-9943019-0-1 Author: Ms Jessica Keysers COPYRIGHT All material in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Aus- tralia Licence, save for content supplied by third parties, and logos. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia Licence is a standard form licence agreement that allows you to copy, distribute, transmit and adapt this publication provided you attribute the work. The full licence terms are available from creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legal- code. A summary of the licence terms is available from creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en. DISCLAIMER While every effort has been made to ensure its accuracy, the CRCS does not offer any express or implied warranties or representations as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained herein. The CRCSI and its employees and agents accept no liability in negligence for the information (or the use of such information) provided in this report. REVIEW OF DIGITAL GLOBES 2015 table OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE OF THIS PAPER ..............................................................................5