DOCSLIB.ORG

4 Cellulose Acetate Membrane Spanning and Adhesion Properties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4 Cellulose Acetate Membrane Spanning and Adhesion Properties Cellulose Acetate Membrane Spanning 4 and Adhesion Properties To create a suspended, organic membrane over an inorganic substrate with large topographical features requires various strategies. This chapter discusses the spanning of a cellulose acetate membrane across silicon microchannels and the method used for good adhesion between cellulose acetate and the substrate. An overview of adhesion theory is first discussed along with factors that affect adhesion and techniques used to characterize adhesion strength. Porous polymer films, prepared using phase inversion techniques, are coated onto inorganic silicon substrates and then characterized for adhesion strength. Experimental data from a blister test setup was used to measure the critical pressure point when a leak was observed on both chemically and mechanically roughened surfaces with a spin-coated, phase-separated cellulose acetate film. These films were observed to have the best adhesion with surfaces treated with octadecyltrichlorosilane (OTS), withstanding pressures above 50 kPa. The last section of this chapter presents the theory and experimental results for spanning cellulose acetate membranes across silicon microchannels. Based on the surface properties of the substrate and the material properties of the cellulose acetate lacquer, it was possible to successfully span 75 µm wide silicon microchannels. 4.1. Polymer adhesion overview Polymeric films are widely used in the microelectronic industry in such application areas as photoresists, interlayer dielectrics, and packaging [87]. Porous polymers, such as those formed using the phase inversion process, have gained interest in the fields of filtration, drug delivery, protein separation, and microdialysis [187]. Unfortunately these films undergo a considerable amount of residual stress after formation, causing them to delaminate from the substrate. In order to enhance film adhesion, microfabricated structures as well as chemical coupling agents have been employed to adhere polyimide films to silicon substrates [71, 75]. In this section a short 89 background on the theory of adhesion, characterization techniques used to gauge the adhesion strength, and factors that affect adhesion quality will be discussed. 4.1.1. Theories of Adhesion Adhesion is defined as the state in which two surfaces are held together by physical and/or chemical attraction. The main adhesion theories include (i) mechanical interlocking, (ii) interdiffusion, (iii) adsorption and surface reaction, and (iv) electrostatic surface attraction. The next four sections provide a description of each theory. Due to the variety of materials and the diversity of adhesion conditions, the field of adhesion is a complex topic and can’t be defined solely by a single model or theory. In reality, several adhesion theories are involved simultaneously to describe an adhesion interface. In the following discussion, the terms ‘coating’, ‘film’, and ‘membrane’ are used interchangeably. 4.1.1.1. Mechanical interlocking theory. The mechanical interlocking theory of adhesion proposes that surface irregularities, such as cavities, pores, and asperities shown in Figure 4-1, are the determining factor for adhesion strength between a coating and a substrate, due the ability of the coating to key and latch to the substrate. The situation is analogous to using a dovetail joint to hold two pieces of wood together. In many cases, the improvement in adhesion due to mechanical interlocking structures can be attributed to the increase in the interfacial area due to surface roughness (as long as the wetting of the surface occurs). Surface roughness increases the adhesive strength of films by promoting wetting as well as providing mechanical anchoring sites. Packham and coworkers found high values of peel strength for polyethylene on metallic substrates when a rough and fibrous-type oxide surface was formed on the substrate [128]. Jiang et al. used mushroom-shaped silicon microstructures to adhere a polyimide film to the substrate [71] Figure 4-1. (left) Smooth surface. (right) rough surface on a microscopic scale allowing for interlocking with coating. Chip 90 One of the criticisms of the mechanical interlocking theory is that the adhesion improvement does not necessarily result from the latching or keying mechanism but that the surface roughness can increase the energy dissipated viscoelastically around a failure point. The scale of the roughness of surfaces can vary from macroscopic to submicroscopic. The factor that controls the rate of penetration of a liquid into cavities and crevices is analogous to the penetration of a liquid into a capillary. The rate of penetration is greatest if the surface tension of the coating is high. The rate is fastest when the contact angle is zero, in this circumstance the surface tension of the liquid is less than that of the solid substrate. The main coating property that an experimentalist can control is the viscosity. The lower the viscosity, the more rapid the penetration. Yet total penetration of an adhesive into cavities and pores is not always possible because of back pressure from entrapped air within these cavities. Mechanical interlocking structures were explored as a mechanism to improve adhesion of thin cellulose acetate membranes onto silicon wafers. Unlike the polyimide films investigated by Jiang et al. [3], the films prepared are porous, suspended over microcavities, and undergo delaminating forces from pressure-driven fluid flow. 4.1.1.2. Interdiffusion theory This theory proposes the adhesion mechanism to mutual interdiffusion of surface layers to form an interphase region. Similar to the mechanical interlocking theory, interdiffusion involves interpenetration of the adhesive material onto the substrate, yet this is done at the molecular level. The interdiffusion theory was originally proposed as a way to explain the autoadhesion (the capability of a material to adhere to itself) of rubbery polymers [182]. When two polymer samples are brought to intimate contact, the polymer chains in the rubbery state possess enough mobility to diffuse across the initial interface. After some time the interface is blurred, and the interfacial adhesion strength becomes close the bulk cohesion strength. Solvent bonding or welding is an interesting case of coupling by interdiffusion. Solvent bonding is a process where the surfaces of polymers to be joined are treated with a solvent. This swells and softens the surfaces and by applying pressure on the joint and with the evaporation of the solvent, 91 the two surfaces bond. Interdiffusion presumably occurs in the presence of the solvent, even if the polymers are immiscible to each other in a lacquer. 4.1.1.3. Adsorption and surface reaction theory Adsorption theory of adhesion is the most widely applicable and assumes that adhesive materials will adhere to a substrate due to interatomic and intermolecular forces at the interface. The most common interfacial forces are from van der Waals and Lewis acid-base interactions and less frequently ionic, covalent, or metallic interfacial bonds. The magnitude of these forces can be generally related to fundamental thermodynamic quantities, such as surface free energies of both the adhesive and adherend. Covalent bonds are generally considered the strongest bonding force in comparison with physical interactions such as van der Waals, which are secondary force interactions. The typical strength of a covalent bond is of the order of 100 to 1000 kJ/mol, while van der Waals interactions and hydrogen bonds do not exceed 50 kJ/mol. The formation of chemical bonds relies on the reactivity of both the coating and the substrate. The best adhesion method is multiple, strong linkages across the interface between two materials. Two distinct surface modification methods that provide a large number of linkages to improve adhesion based on adsorption theory, are surfactants and silane coupling agents. In addition, it is possible to modify the polymer structure to improve adhesion to the substrate using polymer graft copolymerization. These modification methods will now be overviewed briefly. 4.1.1.3.1. Surfactants A surfactant is a substance that has the property of absorbing onto surfaces and altering the free energy of these surfaces [145]. Surfactants essentially lower the surface tension of coatings. Surfactants are usually organic compounds that are amphipathic, meaning they contain both hydrophobic groups (the "tail" of the molecule) and hydrophilic groups (the "head" of the molecule). These two different chemical groups have the purpose of one end being compatible with the liquid to be modified and the other having a lower surface tension. Therefore, they are typically soluble in both organic solvents and water. A surfactant can be classified by the presence of charged groups in its head. A nonionic surfactant has no charge groups in its head while the head of an ionic surfactant carries a net charge. If that net charge is negative, the surfactant is more 92 specifically called anionic; if the net charge is positive, it is called cationic; if both positive and negative charges are present then it is called zwitterionic. Since most surfaces are negatively charges and in order to make those surfaces hydrophobic by use of a surfactant, the best type is a cationic surfactant. This surfactant will adsorb onto the surface with its positively charged hydrophilic head group oriented toward the negatively charged surface and its hydrophobic group oriented away from the surface.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cellulose Acetate Microfilm Forum
    Addressing Cellulose Acetate Microfilm from a British Library Perspective The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Shenton, Helen. 2005. Addressing cellulose acetate microfilm from a British library perspective. Liber Quarterly 15(2). Published Version http://liber.library.uu.nl/publish/articles/000134/article.pdf Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:3965108 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Addressing Cellulose Acetate Microfilm from a British Library perspective by HELEN SHENTON INTRODUCTION This paper is about cellulose acetate microfilm from the British Library perspective. It traces how acetate microfilm became an issue for the British Library and describes cellulose acetate deterioration. This is followed by details of what has already been done about the situation and what action is planned for the future. THE PROBLEM: CELLULOSE ACETATE DETERIORATION In order to tackle the issue it was important to be clear about what cellulose acetate deterioration is, and what can be done about it. Cellulose acetate replaced cellulose nitrate in the late 1940s and was called safety film. This was in use until the mid-1980s, when it was replaced by polyester. One definition of cellulose acetate film from the Image Permanence Institute’s Storage Guide for Acetate Film has not been bettered: “Cellulose acetate film is a modified form of cellulose, and can slowly decompose under the influence of heat, moisture and acids.
    [Show full text]
  • General Introduction Sustainability Issues in the Preservation of Black and White Cellulose Esters Film- Based Negatives Collections
    Élia Catarina Tavares Costa Roldão Licenciada em Conservação e Restauro A contribution for the preservation of cellulose esters black and white negatives Dissertação para obtenção do Grau de Doutor em Ciências da Conservação do Património, Especialidade em Ciências da Conservação Orientador: Doutora Ana Maria Martelo Ramos, Professora Associada, FCT NOVA Co-orientadores: Doutor Bertrand Lavédrine, CRC Doutor António Jorge D. Parola, Professor Associado com Agregação, FCT NOVA Júri: Presidente: Doutora Maria João Seixas de Melo, Professora Catedrática, FCTNOVA Arguentes: Doutor Hugh Douglas Burrows, Professor Catedrático Jubilado, FCT-UC Doutora Ana Isabel S. C. Delgado Martins, Directora do AHU-DGLAB Vogais: Doutora Ana Maria Martelo Ramos, Professora Associada, FCT NOVA Doutor João Pedro Martins de Almeida Lopes, Professor Auxiliar, FF- UL Novembro, 2018 A contribution for the preservation of cellulose esters black and white negatives Copyright © Élia Catarina Tavares Costa Roldão, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa. A Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia e Universidade Nova de Lisboa têm o direito, perpétuo e sem limites geográficos, de arquivar e publicar esta dissertação através de exemplares impressos reproduzidos em papel ou de forma digital, ou por qualquer outro meio conhecido ou que venha a ser inventado, e de divulgar através de repositórios científicos e de admitir a sua cópia e distribuição com objectivos educacionais ou de investigação, não comerciais, desde que seja dado crédito ao autor e editor.
    [Show full text]
  • Object - Photo Report
    Object - Photo Report 82.57.5 Name Moving image Photographer Kingery, Hugh Title Skiing in Colorado Non-original Title Skiing in Colorado Description Black-and-white 16mm movie on cellulose acetate film stock made circa 1950-1955, shot by Hugh Kingery. The film has not been reviewed (as of 7/16/2015) but appears to depict skiing in Colorado. The film is approximately 200 ft. in length. This film is #1 in a series of 3. Inscription The film reel in in a cardboard box with a Colorado Historical Society label. It reads: "Skiing in Colorado / 16mm film by Mr. Kingery / Gift of Mrs. Elinor Kingery / 4629 East Cedar Denver, Colorado 80222 / June 1982" ; Handwritten on label: "1982 prints" Subject Skis and skiing--Colorado, Amateur films Provenance Gift of Elinor Kingery, 1982. Collection Name Hugh M. and Elinor Kingery collection (Ph.00244) 82.57.6 Name Moving image Photographer Kingery, Hugh Title Skiing in Colorado Non-original Title Skiing in Colorado Description Black-and-white 16mm home movie on cellulose acetate film stock made circa 1950-1955, shot by Hugh Kingery. The film has not been reviewed (as of 7/16/2015) but appears to depict skiing in Colorado. The film is approximately 100 ft. in length. This film is #2 in a series of 3. Inscription The film reel in in a cardboard box with a Colorado Historical Society label. It reads: "Skiing in Colorado / 16mm film by Mr. Kingery / Gift of Mrs. Elinor Kingery / 4629 East Cedar Denver, Colorado 80222 / June 1982" ; Handwritten on label: "1982 prints" Subject Skis and skiing--Colorado Provenance Gift of Elinor Kingery, 1982.
    [Show full text]
  • Mellon Guide.Qxd
    THE FILM PRESERVATION GUIDE THE BASICS FOR ARCHIVES, LIBRARIES, AND MUSEUMS National Film Preservation Foundation San Francisco, California National Film Preservation Foundation 870 Market Street, Suite 1113 San Francisco, CA 94102 © 2004 by the National Film Preservation Foundation Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data The film preservation guide : the basics for archives, libraries, and museums. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-9747099-0-5 (alk. paper) 1. Motion picture film—Preservation. I. National Film Preservation Foundation (U.S.) TR886.3F58 2003 778.5’8—dc22 2003024032 CIP This publication was made possible through a grant from The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. It may be downloaded as a PDF file from the National Film Preservation Foundation Web site: www.filmpreservation.org. Credits Except as noted below, all photographs were provided by Barbara Galasso and the L. Jeffrey Selznick School of Film Preservation at George Eastman House. The following contributed illustrations and text material: American Museum of Natural History (94), Anonymous (67), California Pacific Medical Center (57), Chace Productions Inc. (12 center and right), Duke University (48 top), Estate of Edith Lutyens Bel Geddes and the Harry Ransom Humanities Research Center at the University of Texas at Austin (84), Florida Moving Image Archive (91), Image Permanence Institute at the Rochester Institute of Technology (10 top), Library of Congress (48 bottom, 51, 63, 87), Minnesota Historical Society (92), National Center for Jewish Film (90), Nebraska State Historical Society (69, 73, 74), Northeast Historic Film (back cover, 62 bottom, 76, 85), Oklahoma Historical Society (5), Pacific Film Archive at the University of California at Berkeley (back cover), Sabucat Productions (93), UCLA Film and Tele- vision Archive (86), University of Alaska Fairbanks (40), University of South Carolina Newsfilm Library (89), Visual Communications (58).
    [Show full text]
  • Quantification of the Degree of Substitution As a Diagnostic Tool for Assessing the Conservation Condition of Cellulose Nitrate and Acetate in Heritage Collections
    Quantification of the degree of substitution as a diagnostic tool for assessing the conservation condition of cellulose nitrate and acetate in heritage collections Sofia Nunes REQUIMTE – Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Departamento de Química e Departamento de Conservação e Restauro, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] Francesca Ramacciotti Department of Chemistry ‘‘G. Ciamician’’, University of Bologna, Ravenna Campus, Via Guaccimanni 42, 48123 Ravenna, Italy; [email protected] Artur Neves REQUIMTE – Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Departamento de Química e Departamento de Conservação e Restauro, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] Eva Marisole Angelin REQUIMTE – Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Departamento de Química e Departamento de Conservação e Restauro, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] Ana Ramos REQUIMTE – Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Departamento de Química e Departamento de Conservação e Restauro, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516 Monte de Caparica, Portugal; [email protected] Élia Roldão REQUIMTE – Laboratório Associado para a Química Verde, Departamento de Química e Departamento de Conservação e Restauro, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia,
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Identification of Cellulose Nitrate and Cellulose Acetate Film In
    Carter et al. Herit Sci (2020) 8:51 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-020-00395-y RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Rapid identifcation of cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate flm in historic photograph collections Elizabeth A. Carter1,2* , Brad Swarbrick2, Thérèse M. Harrison1 and Lucilla Ronai3 Abstract Cellulose nitrate transparent plastic flm was used by photographers and movie flmmakers from its release in the 1880s to the 1950s. The storage of this material is a challenge for cultural institutions because of its instability and haz- ardous nature, as nitrate is highly fammable and deteriorates over time. Historically, cellulose acetate gradually began to replace cellulose nitrate as it is not fammable. Despite its non-fammable properties, leading to cellulose acetate being called ‘safety’ flm, over time it became clear that it also deteriorates in hazardous ways. Identifcation of cellu- lose nitrate and cellulose acetate in collections is necessary for preservation and risk management to collections and humans. Both cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate are found in gallery, library, archive and museum photographic collections. As a result, identifcation and management of this material might be the responsibility of curators, librar- ians, archivists, collection managers, registrars or conservators, depending on the institution stafng and structure. Currently, there is no single identifcation method readily available to heritage institutions that meets the require- ments to identify and distinguish between cellulose nitrate and cellulose acetate reliably, non-destructively and rapidly. In this study samples from both the Sydney University Museums and Australian National Maritime Museum collections have been analysed using infrared total refectance spectroscopy, a novel approach which demonstrates great potential for rapid and non-invasive identifcation particularly when combined with multivariate statistical analysis methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Acetate Negative Survey
    THE ACETATE NEGATIVE SURVEY FINAL REPORT A PROJECT FUNDED BY THE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE AND THE NATIONAL MUSEUM ACT David G. Horvath University of Louisville Ekstrom Library Photographic Archives February 1987 The University of Louisville Photographic Archives Ekstrom Library Louisville, KY 40292 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The subject of this study should be of great interest to those who are responsible for the preservation of historical photographic negatives. It has involved the cooperation and advice of many people who, piece by piece, have helped construct the method, process, and format of the final product. My wife, Mary has been very supportive and kept me from becoming discouraged by the endless details of the project. My colleagues at the Photographic Archives were most helpful in their constant encouragement, suggestions and warm friendship, especially Andy Anderson, Bill Carner, and Barbara Crawford; Michel C. Atlas was invaluable for her editorial contributions. I thank the National Museum Act of the Smithsonian Institution and the University of Louisville for their assistance and support, especially Barbara Schneider and Martha Bowman, the University of Louisville Librarian. I am indebted to all the institutions which allowed me access to their collections and provided me with a wealth of background information upon which much of this study is based. I owe special thanks to Ford Peatross, Carol Johnson, and Stephen Ostrow of the Library of Congress; Amy Doherty of the Special Collection Department at Syracuse University; Tim Peterson
    [Show full text]
  • Preserving Your Collection of Film-Based Photographic Negatives
    Preserving Your Collection of Film-Based Photographic Negatives Paul Messier Conservator of Photographic Materials and Works of Art on Paper Rocky Mountain Conservation Center Technical bulletin, funded by the Bay Foundation, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................... 1 HISTORY OF FILM-BASED PHOTOGRAPHIC NEGATIVES.................................. 1 DETERIORATION OF FILM-BASED NEGATIVES................................................... 2 Deterioration of Nitrate................................................................................................ 2 Deteriorartion of diacetate and Triacetate.................................................................... 3 HAZARDS ...................................................................................................................... 3 Heath risks from deteriorated negatives....................................................................... 3 Fire hazard posed by nitrate negatives......................................................................... 4 IDENTIFICATION OF FILM-BASED NEGATIVES................................................... 4 STORAGE TECHNIQUES, MATERIALS, AND ENVIRONMENT........................... 4 General Recommendations .......................................................................................... 4 Storage environment .................................................................................................... 5 Cold storage
    [Show full text]
  • Microfilm “Diseases”
    Microfilm “Diseases” Common Microfilm diseases and how to prevent them Introduction • Most collecting institutions still hold materials in microformats. While the most common are the familiar 16mm and 35mm roll microfilm and the flat, card-shaped microfiche, microforms come in a number of shapes, sizes, film bases, and film types. Other, less commonly found microformats include aperture cards (a paper-stock card with a single microfilm frame, usually 35mm, often used for archiving engineering drawings) and microcards (similar to fiche but printed on photographic paper rather than film). Brief History • The concept of micro-photography was introduced in 1839 and was proposed as a document preservation technique in 1851. However, it was not until the era of flexible film that the idea caught on. Originally developed in the 1920s for use in banking, microfilm was embraced by libraries and other institutions: the Library of Congress began a major filming project in 1927. The era of newspaper filming began in 1935 when The New York Times started filming and publishing its print run. In the wake of these two considerable projects, cultural heritage organizations realized they could affordably film their collections not just for preservation, but also for access and distribution, much as digitization is used today. Film Bases Through the years, microforms have been manufactured on various film bases, including cellulose nitrate, cellulose acetate, and polyester. • Cellulose nitrate-based microforms, like other cellulose nitrate films, are highly flammable, prone to releasing hazardous gases over time, and subject to natural decomposition. By the early 1950s, commercial production of all formats of cellulose nitrate film had permanently ceased.
    [Show full text]
  • María Fernanda Valverde Advanced Residency Program in Photograph Conservation Contents Preface
    María Fernanda Valverde Advanced Residency Program in Photograph Conservation CONTENTS Preface ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 4 Paper Negatives ............................................................................................................................... 5 Collodion Glass Plate Negatives ...................................................................................................... 9 Gelatin Dry Plate Negatives ........................................................................................................... 14 Cellulose Nitrate Film Negatives .................................................................................................... 19 Cellulose Acetate Film Negatives................................................................................................... 24 Polyester Film Negatives ................................................................................................................ 29 General Bibliography ..................................................................................................................... 32 Glossary ........................................................................................................................................ 33 Endnotes ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eastman Kodak Date Code Chart
    APPENDIX A: EDGE CODE CHART These charts reproduce the date edge codes from Kodak and Dupont motion pic- ture film. To date your film, find the film’s edge code and select the matching code on the chart. Kodak repeated symbols every 20 years, so you will need additional data to pinpoint the date. For 8mm edge codes used after 1965, see the Web site www.filmforever.org. Fuji film uses a four-digit code; the first two numbers repre- sent the year of manufacture. For more on using edge codes for dating, see 3.3. EASTMAN KODAK DATE CODE CHART DUPONT DATE 1922 1942 1962 ● ■ 1982 ● ■ x CODE CHART 1923 1943 1963 ● ▲ 1983 x ▲x 1956 KL 1924 1944 1964 ▲ ■ 1984 ▲■ ▲ 1957 KN 1925 1945 1965 ■ ● 1985 ■ ● ▲ 1958 KS 1926 1946 1966 ▲ ● 1986 ▲● ▲ 1959 LN 1927 1947 1967 ■ ▲ 1987 ■ ▲▲ 1960 LS 1928 1948 1968* ● ● ● 1988 + + ▲ 1961 NS 1929 1949 1969 + 1989 x + ▲ 1962 K 1930 1950 1970 ▲+ 1990 ▲+ ▲ 1963 L 1931 1951 1971 ● + 1991 x + x 1964 N 1932 1952 1972 ■ + 1992 ■ + ▲ 1965 S 1933 1953 1973 + ▲ 1993 + ▲▲ 1966 KLT 1934 1954 1974 + ● 1994 + ● ▲ 1967 KNT 1935 1955 1975 + ■ 1995 + ■ ▲ 1968 KST 1936 1956 1976 ● 1996 x ● ▲ 1969 LNT 1937 1957 1977 ■ 1997 x ■ ▲ 1970 LST 1938 1958 1978 ▲ 1998 x ▲▲ 1971 NST 1939 1959 1979 ● ● 1999 ● x ▲ 1972 KT 1940 1960 1980 ■ ■ 2000 ■ ■ ▲ 1973 LT 1941 1961 1981 ▲ ▲ 2001 ▲▲● 1974 NT WHERE EASTMAN KODAK STOCK WAS MANUFACTURED SAFETY• - ROCHESTER SAFETY• - CANADA SAFETY• - ENGLAND SAFETY• - FRANCE SAFETY• - AUSTRALIA Source: Adapted from a design by Lauren Jones-Joseph, Sabucat Productions.
    [Show full text]
  • 31St MAY 2019 LISBON, PORTUGAL
    29th – 31st MAY 2019 LISBON, PORTUGAL 0 Title The Plastics Heritage Congress 2019: History, Limits and Possibilities Editors Inês Soares Maria Elvira Callapez Design Inês Soares Paulo Fuentez Printing Gráfica Digital ARP Date 29th – 31st May 2019, Lisbon, Portugal TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME TO THE PLASTICS HERITAGE CONGRESS 2019: HISTORY, LIMITS AND POSSIBILITIES .............................. 3 The congress ................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 About CIUHCT .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 About PHEA (Plastics Heritage European Association) ...................................................................................................... 4 THE CONGRESS VENUE: MUSEU NACIONAL DOS COCHES/ NATIONAL COACH MUSEUM .............................................6 Library ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Auditorium ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Exhibition building.........................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]