The Guildhall Testimonial (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

The Guildhall Testimonial Stop this folly Most major public buildings and their Stop this folly interiors are familiar from photographs. Marcus Binney Courts are different. President of SAVE The Pugin interiors of the Houses of the magnificent interiors with building legislation what sort of Parliament have been restored with furniture and fittings of the highest precedent will be created? No fine infinite care and pride over more than quality supplied to the specification interior will be safe from similar 20 years. Yet just across Parliament of the original architects. special pleading. Square the Department of Constitutional Affairs is proposing to The majority of these photographs If the Law Lords wish to deliberate in strip out Gothic Revival interiors of were taken in difficult circumstances a minimalist modern ambiance let equal quality and completeness for by Mr James Mortimer who was them commission a new building the proposed new Supreme Court. allowed little more than an hour to which can hold its own with the other The vandalism is the greater as the photograph three of the finest handsome and impressive supreme building in question, the Middlesex Edwardian interiors in England. courts around the world. Britain, as Guildhall, is far from redundant and No time was allowed to even tidy the the leading common law country in in intensive use as one of London’s rooms. But we must be thankful that the world, deserves nothing less. busiest criminal courts, the purpose we have been able to take these for which it was designed. photographs at all. SAVE is determined to challenge the Government, English Heritage and It was restored, modernised and With these photographs come a Westminster Council all the way in reopened by the Lord Chancellor in series of testimonials from leading this disgraceful matter. On the last 1989. What the present Lord authorities on Edwardian page we list ways in which you can Chancellor proposes is a disgrace, an architecture, interior design and support our campaign. example of needless destruction and furniture. They make it crystal clear waste which no other owner of a that the interiors of the Guildhall are Only very recently SAVE fought an listed building, public or private, of the very highest quality both in almost lone campaign to prevent the would be allowed to contemplate. terms of craftsmanship and artistic destruction of a masterpiece of distinction and completeness. Edwardian engineering – Span Four The “statement of importance” by in Paddington Station, brilliantly English Heritage on August 26, 2004 No other owner of a Grade II* listed designed to match the original work classed the three main Court interiors building would be allowed to strip by Brunel; one of the greatest as “unsurpassed by any other out interiors of this quality on the engineering geniuses of all time. courtroom of the period in terms of basis of a vague promise to display a That, too, looked a lost cause, but the quality and completeness of their few key pieces in the basement and Network Rail issued a statement in fittings”. find a home for the rest in some July 2006 withdrawing its proposals to other building not yet designed or demolish and announcing repair Most major public buildings and their built. works to the structure. interiors are of course familiar from photographs. Courts are different as a All the Government planning Please help us stop this madness, blanket prohibition of photography of guidance on listed buildings lays which will never be more than a court proceedings has been down a presumption in favour of temporary stop-gap solution. interpreted as a prohibition of all continuing the original use of a photography inside court buildings. historic building. So why make an exception for the highest court in the The first purpose of this SAVE report, land? If the Lord Chancellor and the like so many others before it, is to Law Lords can drive a proverbial show the quality of what is at stake – coach and horses through the listed The throne of Court 1 with its intricately carved coat of arms. Art Deco influences can be seen in the treatment of the ogee arches and their spandrels The main staircase illustrates the quality of the ironwork, fittings and fixtures. The walls are stucco imitating stone Middlesex Guildhall was the crowning Testimonials: achievement of the career of James Glen Sivewright Gibson, one of the most original Architecture architects of the late Victorian and Edwardian times. DAVID WALKER In partnership with Samuel Bridgman and the still more gifted Frank Chief inspector of historic buildings Scotland Russell, also from Wallace’s office, he Peyton Skipwith, who was 1976-1993, expert adviser to the National had a remarkable run of success in responsible for so much of the Heritage Memorial Fund 1980-99, competitions in the 1890s, notably at superb detail, inside and out, at the Professor of Art History in the University of the County Offices in Wakefield in Middlesex Guildhall. St Andrews 1994- , Director of University of 1894, West Ham Technical College in St Andrews Dictionary of Scottish Architects 1995 and Hull Library, only narrowly Middlesex Guildhall differs from project 2002-. missing Edinburgh North Bridge and Gibson’s other work in being gothic Cardiff City Hall where they came rather than baroque as at Walsall Middlesex Guildhall was the crowning second. Municipal Buildings and Debenham achievement of the career of James and Freebody’s in Wigmore Street. In Glen Sivewright Gibson, one of the All of these were brilliant freestyle its sheer originality of composition most original architects of the late designs developing themes from and detail it is the secular equivalent Victorian and Edwardian times. Born Collcutt. In 1900 he went on to a still of Giles Gilbert Scott’s Liverpool in Arbroath in 1861, sheer brilliance more successful phase in partnership Cathedral, and although a much took him from those unpromising with first Wallace and then with his smaller building it should be treated offices in Dundee to those of William associate Walter Symington Athol with exactly the same respect. British Wallace and most importantly Gordon, a pupil of the Beaux Arts - parallels outwith the mostly Thomas Edward Collcutt in London. trained Frank Worthington Simon, unrealised designs of Harry Wilson Court 2, lit by powerfully designed electroliers and large windows facing a light well, remains a busy court room that imparts the full majesty of the law are hard to suggest. One has to think of the interior ensembles and their the leading Glasgow firm, Wylie & more in terms of the work of the good state of preservation was a Lochhead, who were associated with American Bertram Grosvenor revelation (like most Londoners I was the greatest days of Glasgow Goodhue: the Guildhall is quite familiar with the sophisticated and prosperity, employing distinguished simply a building of international rewarding late Gothic Revival exterior). designers such as E. A. Taylor, George importance in early twentieth century Logan, John Ednie. Already in 1882 gothic revival work, and the notion of Clearly there have been practical they had 1,700 employees. forming a museum of some of the interventions, particularly in the best interior work in that context is infilling of courtyards. But there has I was for over 23 years in the quite unacceptable: the building was been very little damage at all to the Furniture & Woodwork Department of designed as courts and it is hard to original interiors. All the components the Victoria & Albert Museum, ending see why the Law Lords cannot adapt of these grand ensembles, carved up as its Curator, before spending five to what exists. They would have had stone, plasterwork, oak roofs, years as Director of the Fitzwilliam to if Soane’s courts had survived, and panelling and furniture, tiles, stained Museum in Cambridge, and then Gibson’s building should not be glass, electroliers, and numerous seven years as Director of Historic treated any differently because it is details from door furniture to clothes Buildings of the National Trust. I Edwardian. It is not less important. hooks, constitute a paradigm of the continue active in retirement. I am ability of the final generation of shortly to serve as a Senior Research Gothic Revival architects to achieve Fellow at the Center for Advanced SIMON SWYNFEN JERVIS V.P.S.A congruity without monotony, Study in the Visual Arts, which is part supported by an extremely of the National Gallery of Art in On 7th August Mr Laverick showed me accomplished cast of builders, Washington. There, ironically, I shall round the Crown Court at the craftsmen, suppliers etc. I was, be a stone’s throw from the United Middlesex Guildhall. As I had not been naturally, particularly impressed by States Supreme Court, housed in a inside the building before, the quality the excellent woodwork, executed by great purpose-built monument. How sad if its British equivalent were to be set up in a make-shift conversion, involving the vandalising of a distinguished Grade II* building. The proposals involved the flattening out and reorientation of the former Council Chamber, the gutting of one excellently preserved court into a library, and the other into a committee room. I gather that a token and pathetic act of reparation would involve the retention of odd selected elements in a basement ‘museum’. Surely the obvious answer is for the Supreme Court to be housed elsewhere and for the present sympathetic use of the building to continue. Minor adjustments could JGS Gibson 1861-1951 Giant columns and Gibbs surrounds of windows are still permitted, but the turret and cupola shapes for instance are In the early 1880s Gibson moved to London, to the without any period precedent.
Recommended publications
  • HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11

    HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11

    Pay and Grading: the DCA Deal Inverness London Aberdeen Barnet Edmonton Wood Green Enfield Harrow Hendon Haringey (Highgate) Waltham Forest Romford Snaresbrook Havering Ilford Redbridge Uxbridge Locations in Bow Barking Ealing Stratford Dundee Range 1 are Acton Harmondsworth Brentford listed below Woolwich Isleworth Greenwich Hounslow (Feltham) Richmond Upon Bexley Thames Hatton Cross Stirling Wimbledon Kingston Upon Bromley Thames Glasgow Croydon Edinburgh Berwick upon Tweed Sutton Hamilton Ayr Alnwick Court and Tribunal DCA Offices Morpeth Bedlington Blackfriars Headquarters: DCA / HMCS / Tribunals Bow St. Selborne House Gosforth Brent Newcastle upon Tyne Clive House Hexham Camberwell Green Blaydon North Shields Steel House Central Criminal Court Carlisle Gateshead South Shields Abbey Orchard St. Sunderland Central London Millbank Tower Consett City of London Durham Houghton Le Spring 30 Millbank Peterlee Clerkenwell Maltravers Street Bishop Auckland Penrith Hartlepool Highbury Corner 185 Marylebone Road Workington Newton Aycliffe Horseferry Rd. IL&CFP Darlington Teesside Scotland Office Whitehaven Guisborough Inner London Sessions House Wales Office Thornaby Whitby Lambeth Privy Council Marylebone Public Guardianship Office Kendal Richmond Mayor's & City of London Law Commission Middlesex Guildhall (Theobalds Road) Northallerton Scarborough Royal Courts of Justice Supreme Court Taxing Office Pickering Shoreditch Barrow-in-Furrness (Fetter Lane) South West Balham Statutory Publications Office Bridlington Southwark (Tufton Street) Harrogate
  • Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School

    Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School

    volume 48, number 3 Spring 2005 Making the LIKE SEVERAL OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE AT very different pressures. For me, the greatest Transition THE GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL pressure is thinking on my feet while law stu- from Law OF LAW LIBRARY, I have recently made the dents and public patrons stand before me Firm to change from law firm librarian to law school expecting instant answers. I have always pre- librarian. Every time I run into a library col- ferred a few minutes to quietly digest a problem Law School league, everyone wants to know what it is like before plunging in. I am forced to process the and what the differences are. Let me start off by issue, begin working on it, and keep talking Christine Ciambella offering the obligatory disclaimer – these opin- with the patron all at the same time. Like any- Access & Research ions are my own and do not reflect the beliefs thing else, I am getting better with practice. Services Librarian of my employer (present or former). I did solicit In the law firm I had the luxury of sending George Mason opinions from colleagues and am grateful for an attorney back to his/her office with the University School their insight and experience. The two settings promise to bring my research product to them of Law really are quite different, but I’m not prepared later that day. I am often able to do this with to say one is “better” than the other. professors (but not with students). In contrast During my career as a law firm reference to practicing attorneys, the professors generally librarian I specialized in legislative history.
  • Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group

    Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group

    WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN Illustration credits and copyright references for photographs, maps and other illustrations are under negotiation with the following organisations: Dean and Chapter of Westminster Westminster School Parliamentary Estates Directorate Westminster City Council English Heritage Greater London Authority Simmons Aerofilms / Atkins Atkins / PLB / Barry Stow 2 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including St. Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site Management Plan Prepared on behalf of the Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group, by a consortium led by Atkins, with Barry Stow, conservation architect, and tourism specialists PLB Consulting Ltd. The full steering group chaired by English Heritage comprises representatives of: ICOMOS UK DCMS The Government Office for London The Dean and Chapter of Westminster The Parliamentary Estates Directorate Transport for London The Greater London Authority Westminster School Westminster City Council The London Borough of Lambeth The Royal Parks Agency The Church Commissioners Visit London 3 4 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE S I T E M ANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD by David Lammy MP, Minister for Culture I am delighted to present this Management Plan for the Palace of Westminster, Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site. For over a thousand years, Westminster has held a unique architectural, historic and symbolic significance where the history of church, monarchy, state and law are inexorably intertwined. As a group, the iconic buildings that form part of the World Heritage Site represent masterpieces of monumental architecture from medieval times on and which draw on the best of historic construction techniques and traditional craftsmanship.
  • The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of

    The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of

    The Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCOTUS) and The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC): A comparative learning tool This resource summarises some of the similarities and differences between the most senior appeal courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. This is an area often explored by students studying Law at Sixth Form/Further Education level. This resource is intended to encourage discussion within groups, and some questions are provided at the end to encourage you to think about the different approaches of the two courts. This resource is offered as material for schools and colleges and is not intended as a comprehensive guide to the statutory position of either Supreme Court or their practices. Queries about the work of UKSC should be directed via our website, www.supremecourt.uk. SCOTUS UKSC When was it The SCOTUS is over 200 years old and The UKSC is five years old and opened established? was established in 1789. on 16 October 2009. It is located in the former Middlesex Guildhall building. The Article III, Section 1, of the American grade II listed building was built in 1913 Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial and was renovated between 2007 and Power of the United States, shall be 2009 to turn the building into a suitable vested in one supreme Court, and in such home for the Supreme Court. inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The highest court of appeal for the UK used to be found in the House of Lords, The Supreme Court of the United States sitting as what was known as the was created in accordance with this Appellate Committee of the House of provision and by authority of the Lords.
  • Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System

    Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System

    Edinburgh Research Explorer Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System Citation for published version: Walker, N 2010, Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. <http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/299388/0093334.pdf> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publisher Rights Statement: ©Walker, N. (2010). Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 FINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SCOTTISH LEGAL SYSTEM Crown Copyright 2010 ISBN: 978-0-7559-8213-4 Further copies are available from Eli do Rego The Scottish Government Legal System Division 2nd Floor West St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG 0131 244 3839 [email protected] An electronic copy of the full report including
  • The Supreme Court; Annual Report and Accounts 2013–2014 HC 36

    The Supreme Court; Annual Report and Accounts 2013–2014 HC 36

    The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 4 July 2016. HC 32 © Crown Copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@ nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.uk Print ISBN 9781474132770 Web ISBN 9781474132787 ID 11051611 06/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Front cover image © Kevin Leighton The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 4 contents one two three four FOREWORD AND OVERVIEW: OBJECTIVES
  • John Webb Singer and His Wife Sarah, Taken in the 1890S

    The Story of J.W. Singer & Sons, Frome John Webb Singer and his wife Sarah, taken in the 1890s Made in Frome rom the humble beginnings of a simple request for a to Frome Museum. There are over 3,000 surviving glass pair of brass candlesticks in 1848, the J.W. Singer & Sons plate negatives and photographs, the earliest of which are F foundry at Waterloo went on to produce some of the collodion negatives dating from the 1860s when Singer most iconic statues around the British Isles and across the moved into his purpose-built foundry at Waterloo. globe, employing at its height a workforce of seven hundred. Through skill and ingenuity, John Webb Singer amassed The archive is evidence that Singer’s were also leaders in knowledge and made use of every opportunity to train their use of photography and, whilst not documented, we himself and his workforce. He was the perfect example of have to assume that this was due to John Webb Singer’s paternalistic Victorian industry and enterprise, and although knowledge and desire to harness this relatively new heavily influenced by his many trips to Europe, he was made technology. Whether it was ecclesiastical, domestic or and shaped in Frome. In turn, Singer shaped, embellished statuary, an example of every piece of work would be and enriched Frome. photographed before it departed the foundry, usually against a movable white backdrop. It is not always the The story we are able to tell here was so nearly lost to object being photographed that is of most interest to us history but for the quick thinking of Singer’s employee now, but the asides at the edge of the frame showing details Steve Francis.
  • Pdf; Last Access: June 24, 2014

    Pdf; Last Access: June 24, 2014

    International Journal For Court Administration Vol. 6 No. 2 Thirteenth Issue ISSN 2156-7964 Rwandan Gacaca Court Rwamagana District, Eastern Province, Rwanda IACA The Official Publication of the International Association For Court Administration www.iaca.ws International Association For Court Administration International Journal For Court Administration International Association For Court Administration IJCA is an electronic journal published on the IACA website (www.iaca.ws). As its name suggests, IJCA OFFICERS focuses on contemporary court administration and management. Its scope is international, and the Editors welcome submissions from court officials, judges, justice ministry officials, academics and others Cathy Hiuser whose professional work and interests lie in the practical aspects of the effective administration of justice. President Jeffrey A. Apperson Markus Zimmer Philip Langbroek Linda Wade-Bahr Chief Executive Officer Executive Editor Managing Editor Technical Editor Hon. Vladimir Freitas [email protected] [email protected] President-Elect Sheryl L. Loesch Andreas Lienhard Luis Maria Palma Anne Wallace Leisha Lister Chief Administrative Officer Journal Editor Journal Editor Journal Editor Journal Editor Carline Ameerali Vice President, Europe Editorial Board IACA Journal Norman Meyer Vice President, North America Dr. Pim Albers, Senior Project Leader, Institute for Global Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands Andrew Phelan Jeffrey A. Apperson, Vice President for International Affairs NCSC, Virginia, USA, IACA Board Executive CEO Vice President, South Asia & Australia Dr. Carl Baar, Professor Emeritus, Brock University Adjunct Professor of Political Science, York University, Toronto, Collin Ijoma, Ontario, Canada Vice President, Africa Dr. Dacian Dragos, Jean Monnet Associate Professor, Centre for Good Governance Studies, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Mark Beer Dr.
  • Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom

    Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom

    Copyright 2014 by Erin F. Delaney Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 108, No. 2 JUDICIARY RISING: CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Erin F. Delaney ABSTRACT—Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-of- law-based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid. AUTHOR—Assistant Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. For helpful conversations during a transatlantic visit at a very early stage of this project, I am grateful to Trevor Allan, Lord Hope, Charlie Jeffery, Lord Collins, and Stephen Tierney.
  • CRIMINAL JUSTICE and TAXATION Ii

    CRIMINAL JUSTICE and TAXATION Ii

    i CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND TAXATION ii OXFORD MONOGRAPHS ON CRIMINAL LAW AND JUSTICE Series Editor: Andrew Ashworth CBE QC, Emeritus Vinerian Professor of English Law, All Souls College, Oxford This series aims to cover all aspects of criminal law and procedure including criminal evidence. The scope of this series is wide, encompassing both practical and theoretical works. OTHER TITLES IN THIS SERIES In Search of Criminal Punishment and Freedom Responsibility Alan Brudner Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Nicola Lacey Prosecuting Domestic Violence A Philosophical Analysis Character in the Criminal Trial Michelle Madden Dempsey Mike Redmayne Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays Preventive Justice of Criminal Proceedings Andrew Ashworth and Andrew L.- T. Choo Lucia Zedner A Philosophy of Evidence Law Homicide and the Politics Justice in the Search for Truth of Law Reform Hock Lai Ho Jeremy Horder The Criminal Justice System The Insecurity State and Healthcare Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right Edited by Charles A. Erin and to Security in the Criminal Law Suzanne Ost Peter Ramsay Rethinking Imprisonment Manifest Madness Richard Lippke Mental Incapacity in the Criminal Law Killing in Self- Defence Arlie Loughnan Fiona Leverick The Ethics of Plea Bargaining Richard L. Lippke iii Criminal Justice and Taxation PETER ALLDRIDGE Drapers’ Professor of Law, Queen Mary University of London 1 iv 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © P.
  • MIDDLESEX COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Records, 1774-93 Reel M581

    MIDDLESEX COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Records, 1774-93 Reel M581

    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT MIDDLESEX COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Records, 1774-93 Reel M581 Middlesex County Record Office 1 Queen Anne’s Gate Buildings Dartmouth Street London SW1H 9BS National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1964 HISTORICAL NOTE The Middlesex County Record Office evolved from the collection of records of Middlesex Quarter Sessions which the Clerk of the Peace was required to preserve, together with other records such as enclosure awards. At the direction of a committee of the justices of peace, the old records were first sorted and listed in the 1880s. The new Middlesex Guildhall at Westminster, which was equipped with muniment rooms, opened in 1913 and in 1923 a full-time assistant was placed in charge of the records. The first county archivist was appointed in 1946, initially on a part-time basis. In the late 1950s the record office moved into new premises in Dartmouth Street. In 1965 the new Greater London Council took over the record offices of the London County Council and the defunct Middlesex County Council. However they remained in separate premises until 1979, when the Dartmouth Street premises were sold. Both archives were then housed in County Hall. In 1982 the Greater London Record Office moved to a new building in Clerkenwell. In 1986 the Greater London Council was abolished and the record office became the responsibility of the City of London Corporation. Its name was changed to the London Metropolitan Archives in 1997. In addition to the Middlesex Sessions records, selected records held in the Greater London Record Office were filmed by the Australian Joint Copying Project and can be found on reels M3087-3105.
  • The Supreme Court Annual Report 2013

    The Supreme Court Annual Report 2013

    The Supreme Court AnnualCourt ReportAccountsThe Supreme and 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 May 2013. HC 3 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Crown Copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102983234 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2557463 05/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 4 Contents one two three four FOREWORD AND SETTING DIRECTION: THE SUPREME COURT SERVING THE UK AND INCREASING INTRODUCTION OUR