DOCSLIB.ORG

Courts and Tribunals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COURTSCOURTS ANDAND TRIBUNALSTRIBUNALS XII SEMINARIO DE ESTUDIO COMPARADO DE SISTEMAS JUDICIALES Y DE COOPERACIÓN JUDICIAL INTERNACIONAL A TRAVÉS DEL LENGUAJE JURÍDICO Águilas 2010 ConstitutionalConstitutional ReformReform ActAct 20052005 Key changes brought in by the Act: - Duty on government ministers to uphold the independence of the judiciary. - Reform of the post of Lord Chancellor, transferring his judicial functions to the President of the Courts of England and Wales – a new title given to the Lord Chief Justice. - Establishment of a new, independent Supreme Court, separate from the House of Lords and with its own independent appointments system, staff and budget. - A new independent Judicial Appointments Commission, responsible for selecting candidates to recommend for judicial appointment to the Secretary of State for Justice (now Minister of Justice). - A new Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman, responsible for investigating and making recommendations concerning complaints about the judicial appointments process, and the handling of judicial conduct complaints ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 2 BODIES RESPONSIBLE FOR JUSTICE ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 3 CourtsCourts andand tribunalstribunals Lord Chancellor’s Department Ð Department for Constitutional Affairs (created 2003, started 2005) Ð Ministry of Justice (as of 9th May 2007) ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 4 MinistryMinistry ofof JusticeJustice ((MoJMoJ)) MINISTRY OF JUSTICE (as of 9th May 2007): ¾Replaces Lord Chancellor’s Department & Department for Constitutional Affairs. ¾Responsibilities: reforms to Constitution, administration of courts, appointment of judiciary (Judicial Appointments Commission, JAC), human rights, data protection, freedom of information, coroners, local government elections, etc. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 5 LordLord ChancellorChancellor Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice: Rt. Hon. Jack Straw ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 6 LordLord ChancellorChancellor ¾The Lord Chancellor is now the government minister responsible to Parliament for the courts and the justice system. ¾He is a Cabinet Minister and a Member of the House of Commons. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 7 LordLord ChancellorChancellor CHANGES IN THE ROLE OF THE LORD CHANCELLOR: ¾ Not the Head of the Judiciary anymore. [Lord Chief Justice]. ¾ He was the Speaker of the House of Lords, now he is a Member of the House of Commons. ¾ Not a judge of the Court of Appeal and of the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords. Lord Chancellor HAD legislative, judicial and executive powers Î not in conformance with the European Convention on Human Rights [separation of powers] NOW: Distinction between Government, Parliament and the Judiciary (UK Parliament webpage, (http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/principal/lord_chancellor.cfm) ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 8 TheThe LordLord ChiefChief JusticeJustice LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES • President of the Courts of England and Wales. • Head of the Judiciary of England and Wales. • Head of the Criminal Division of the Court of Appeal. Igor Judge, Baron Judge, PC, QC (born 19 May 1941)[2] is the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 9 LordLord ChiefChief JusticeJustice Sir Igor Judge [CoA: Lord Justice Judge] ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 10 LordLord ChancellorChancellor && formerformer LordLord ChiefChief JusticeJustice ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 11 LordLord ChancellorChancellor andand currentcurrent LordLord ChiefChief JusticeJustice ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 12 HerHer MajestyMajesty’’ss CourtCourt ServiceService (HMCS)(HMCS) • HER MAJESTY’S COURTS SERVICE (HMCS), executive agency of the Ministry of Justice (MoJ): manages the business of the courts, including infrastructure and resources. • All staff in HMCS owe a joint duty to the Lord Chancellor and the Lord Chief Justice. • It also administers the Probate Service. Her Majesty’s Court Service: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/ ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 13 HerHer MajestyMajesty’’ss CourtCourt ServiceService (HMCS)(HMCS) At present there are 652 courts (around 2,600 courtrooms) in England & Wales (of which 400 are magistrates’ courts) staffed by some 20,000 members of HMCS. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 14 COURTS ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 15 CourtsCourts • THE SUPREME COURT [of the United Kingdom]. Constitutional Reform Act 2005. In Middlesex Guildhall. • SENIOR COURTS OF ENGLAND AND WALES (since Constitutional Reform Act 2005; formerly The Supreme Courts of Judicature): The High Court of Justice, The Crown Court, The Court of Appeal (Criminal & Civil Division). • INFERIOR COURTS: County Courts, Magistrates’ Courts, (Family Proceedings Courts, Youth Courts). • Her Majesty’s Court Service Annual Report and Accounts: http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/cms/files/HMCS- AnnualReportAndAccounts-2008-09.pdf ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 16 CourtsCourts:: judgesjudges && magistratesmagistrates ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 17 CourtsCourts OTHER COURTS: • Judicial Committee of the Privy Council: 5 Lords of Appeal. Court of final appeal for UK Overseas Territories (Falklands, Cayman, Islands, Gibraltar, Bermuda, etc.), Crown Dependencies (Jersey, Guersey, Isle of Man) + some Commonwealth countries. Also for devolution issues and some domestic jurisdiction. “HoL wearing a different wig”. • Coroner’s Court (suspicious deaths). Inquests. • Ecclesiastical Courts (church property, errant clergy). • Courts-Martial (military). • The Restrictive Practices Court (competition). • The Court of Chivalry (heraldry). ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 18 COURTS EXERCISING CIVIL COURTS EXERCISING JURISDICTION CRIMINAL JURISDICTION THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UK COURT OF APPEAL Civil Division Criminal Division HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE CROWN COURT Chancery Family Queen’s criminal Division Division Bench Division Divisional Divisional Administrative Senior Court Court Court courts COUNTY Inferior courts COURTS MAGISTRATES’ COURTS TRIBUNALS ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 19 ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 20 MAGISTRATES’ COURTS ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 21 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts Bow Street Magistrates’ Court (London) ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 22 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts 2008/2009: 2.03 million criminal cases heard in magistrates’ courts (as compared with approximately 120,000 in the Crown Court). http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/judicialand courtstatistics.htm ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 23 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts 2009: 29,270 magistrates ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 24 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts • They include Family Proceedings Courts & Youth Courts. • Panel (Bench) of 3 magistrates (Justices of the Peace) supported by a legally qualified/trained court clerk (Legal Advisor). Advice given in open court or summarised in open court → transparency. • Not paid (but allowances). ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 25 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts • Also District Judges (“stipendiary magistrates” until August 2000) sitting alone. Requirements: 7 years’ experience (minimum) as Barrister or Solicitor and 2 years’ experience as Deputy District Judge. • Maximum penalty available to Magistrates’ Courts: 6 months imprisonment and/or a fine of £5,000.00. • Also deal with some civil cases (family matters, betting and gaming). ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 26 MagistratesMagistrates’’ CourtsCourts Magistrates deal with three kinds of cases: • Summary offences: less serious cases, such as motoring offences and minor assaults, where the defendant is not usually entitled to trial by jury. • Either-way offences: these can be dealt with either by the Magistrates or before a judge + jury at the Crown Court. Examples: theft, handling stolen goods. A defendant can insist on their right to trial in the Crown Court. Similarly, Magistrates can decide that a case is sufficiently serious that it should be dealt with in the Crown Court – which can impose tougher sentences if the defendant is found guilty. • Preliminary stages of indictable-only offences, such as murder, manslaughter, rape and robbery. These must be heard at a Crown Court (commit for trial). ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 27 FamilyFamily ProceedingsProceedings CourtsCourts && YouthYouth CourtsCourts • Specialised form of Magistrates’ courts. • Youth Courts not open to general public. • Youth Courts: 10 to 17 year olds (BUT NOT serious offences, homicide & rape -Crown Court-). ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 28 YouthYouth CourtsCourts ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 29 COUNTY COURTS ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 30 CountyCounty CourtsCourts Manchester’s Civil Justice Centre (houses County Court). Crown Court + County Court= combined court ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 31 CountyCounty CourtsCourts • 218 across England & Wales. • Majority of civil litigation, subject to nature of the claim: debt repayment, personal injury, breach of contract (concerning goods or property), family issues (divorce or adoption), housing disputes (mortgage, etc.). • Governed by County Courts Act 1984 + Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR). • District judges. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 32 CROWN COURT ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 33 CrownCrown CourtCourt Old Bailey (London), Central Criminal Court ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 34 CrownCrown CourtCourt • 78 centres across England and Wales. • Trials for indictable offences (serious criminal cases: murder, rape, robbery), appeals from magistrates’ courts, cases for sentence. • Except in very limited circumstances, all trials take place with a jury. • Trials: 1 judge + 12-person (randomly selected citizens) jury. • Presided over by High Court Judges, Circuit Judges or Recorders. • Divided
Recommended publications
  • HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11

    HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11

    Pay and Grading: the DCA Deal Inverness London Aberdeen Barnet Edmonton Wood Green Enfield Harrow Hendon Haringey (Highgate) Waltham Forest Romford Snaresbrook Havering Ilford Redbridge Uxbridge Locations in Bow Barking Ealing Stratford Dundee Range 1 are Acton Harmondsworth Brentford listed below Woolwich Isleworth Greenwich Hounslow (Feltham) Richmond Upon Bexley Thames Hatton Cross Stirling Wimbledon Kingston Upon Bromley Thames Glasgow Croydon Edinburgh Berwick upon Tweed Sutton Hamilton Ayr Alnwick Court and Tribunal DCA Offices Morpeth Bedlington Blackfriars Headquarters: DCA / HMCS / Tribunals Bow St. Selborne House Gosforth Brent Newcastle upon Tyne Clive House Hexham Camberwell Green Blaydon North Shields Steel House Central Criminal Court Carlisle Gateshead South Shields Abbey Orchard St. Sunderland Central London Millbank Tower Consett City of London Durham Houghton Le Spring 30 Millbank Peterlee Clerkenwell Maltravers Street Bishop Auckland Penrith Hartlepool Highbury Corner 185 Marylebone Road Workington Newton Aycliffe Horseferry Rd. IL&CFP Darlington Teesside Scotland Office Whitehaven Guisborough Inner London Sessions House Wales Office Thornaby Whitby Lambeth Privy Council Marylebone Public Guardianship Office Kendal Richmond Mayor's & City of London Law Commission Middlesex Guildhall (Theobalds Road) Northallerton Scarborough Royal Courts of Justice Supreme Court Taxing Office Pickering Shoreditch Barrow-in-Furrness (Fetter Lane) South West Balham Statutory Publications Office Bridlington Southwark (Tufton Street) Harrogate
  • Download Download

    Download Download

    AAMICUSMICUS CCURIAEURIAE Journal of the Society for ADVANCED LEGAL STUDIES ISSUE 109 Spring 2017 IN THIS ISSUE A PROPOSAL FOR A GLOBAL OMBUDSMAN SERVICE Seeking redress for supply chain workers for harm done by from global corporations ..............................2 THE TRANSNATIONAL CRIME OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING Taking the Canadian human security approach .............................................20 LEGAL FORM AND INDEPENDENCE OF SPECIALIST REGULATORS The case of the Oil and Gas Authority .....................................25 Amicus Curiae GENERAL EDITOR Professor Roger Kain, Dean, School of Advanced Michael Blair QC, 3 Verulam Buildings Study, University of London Professor Barry A K Rider, Professorial Fellow, The Hon Mr Justice Cranston Development Studies Programme, University of Cambridge, Paul Kohler, School of Oriental and African Studies Fellow Commoner and sometime Fellow, Dean and Tutor of Professor Rosa Greaves, University of Glasgow Jesus College, Cambridge, Honorary Senior Research Fellow, The Rt Hon Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chair, Law IALS Commission Peter Harris, former Official Solicitor Ian Macleod, Legal Adviser to the Foreign and The Rt Hon The Lord Hope of Craighead KT, DEPUTY GENERAL EDITOR Commonwealth Office former Deputy President, The Supreme Court of the United Julian Harris, Associate Research Fellow, Institute of Kingdom Advanced Legal Studies Professor Linda Mulcahy, London School of Economics and Political Science Sonya Leydecker, Herbert Smith Freehills ADVISORY COUNCIL OF THE Professor Valsamis Mitsilegas,
  • Claim Form Commercial Court N1 (CC) : CPR Part 7 : V4.0 Royal Courts of Justice

    Claim Form Commercial Court N1 (CC) : CPR Part 7 : V4.0 Royal Courts of Justice

    In the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division Claim Form Commercial Court N1 (CC) : CPR Part 7 : v4.0 Royal Courts of Justice Claim number Claim title Notes for completion Once completed please e-mail this form to [email protected]. You will receive a 'sealed for service' version and an amendable version of the form by return of e-mail. Claimant(s) Add New Claimant Clear All Claimants Name Address Postcode Country Telephone No Delete this Claimant Add New Claimant Defendant(s) Add New Defendant Clear All Defendants Defendants unknown at present Name Address Postcode Country Telephone No Delete this Defendant Add New Defendant The court office at the Admiralty and Commercial Registry, Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London, WC2A 2LL is open from 10:00am to 4:30pm Monday to Friday. When corresponding with the court, please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number. Page 1 of 3 Financial information Non-Monetary What type of claim is this ? Monetary Only Part Monetary Relief Court fee breakdown Non-monetary relief fee (if applicable) £0.00 Part 7 fee £0.00 Court fee total £0.00 Solicitors costs (£) GBP. To be assessed Reset Financial Data Brief details of claim You should type into this section a concise statement of the nature of the claim, together with the remedy sought and statement of value where appropriate pursuant to CPR 16.2(1) (Part 7 Claim) or CPR 8.2(Part 8 Claim). If you wish to file more detailed particulars of claim with this claim form you can use the attachment option in section 4b, or you may file them separately at a later stage using the 'MultiPurpose' form which will be available to you once you have issued.
  • In the High Court of Justice of the Isle of Man Civil Division Probate Application Form

    In the High Court of Justice of the Isle of Man Civil Division Probate Application Form

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE ISLE OF MAN CIVIL DIVISION PROBATE APPLICATION FORM Please refer to the GUIDANCE NOTES to assist you in completing this form. Please use CAPITAL LETTERS The Guidance Notes can be viewed online at https://www.courts.im/court-procedures/probate-and-admin-of-estates/ or they can be obtained by email from [email protected] or by telephoning (01624) 685243 There are guidance notes provided to help you complete this probate application form. They should not be treated as a complete and authoritative statement of the law. Please note that Probate Office staff members are not permitted to give legal advice or offer opinions and therefore if you are in any doubt about your rights, or the procedures to follow in relation to obtaining probate, you should seek legal advice. The Probate Staff can however provide assistance in the completion of this form. Where required, please refer to the Glossary of Terms of commonly used legal expressions in the Guidance Notes. Section A – Details of the Deceased 1. Surname Title MR MRS MISS MS OTHER 2. Forename(s) 3. Alias name(s) – (if any) 4. Address (enter last, full permanent address, including postcode) 5. Place of Domicile 6. Nationality 7. Occupation (if any) 8. Date of Death (Death Certificate attached herewith) 9. Place of Death (enter full address, including postcode) 1 Section B – Details of the Estate 10. Did the deceased leave a Will? YES NO If NO, go to Q.14 11. Date of Will (being submitted with this form) 12.
  • SAS V. WPL: a Longstanding Transatlantic Dispute with an East Texas Flavor

    SAS V. WPL: a Longstanding Transatlantic Dispute with an East Texas Flavor

    Free Speech, Due Process and Trial by Jury SAS v. WPL: A Longstanding Transatlantic Dispute with an East Texas Flavor NOVEMBER 25, 2020 | BY NATALIE POSGATE SAS Institute and World Programming Limited • The case involved claims of infringement of have sparred against each other in courtrooms “non-literal” elements of a software work, a on both sides of the Atlantic for 11 years. less-frequented claim in intellectual property law that is as nuanced as it is hard to prove; The storied litigation between the two software and programming competitors essentially tells the same tale each time: SAS accuses World • Just as the case was heading to a jury trial Programming of copyright infringement. SAS in September, the complexity of the issues doesn’t prevail. SAS sues WPL somewhere prompted Judge Gilstrap to delay the trial and else but includes additional allegations. WPL set a special hearing to determine the extent counterclaims. And the case has also caused to which the non-literal elements of SAS’ a trans-Atlantic tiff between judges in the U.S. software were copyrightable. “A hearing like and the United Kingdom. that in itself is a rare event, due to the unusual allegations here, but Judge Gilstrap embraced This plot has played out on the home turfs of the need to dig in and make sure the scope of both companies with mixed results. The High SAS’ IP rights were properly framed to a jury,” Court of Justice in London – previously known Caldwell said. as “Her Majesty’s High Court of Justice” – ruled against SAS.
  • Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School

    Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School

    volume 48, number 3 Spring 2005 Making the LIKE SEVERAL OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE AT very different pressures. For me, the greatest Transition THE GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL pressure is thinking on my feet while law stu- from Law OF LAW LIBRARY, I have recently made the dents and public patrons stand before me Firm to change from law firm librarian to law school expecting instant answers. I have always pre- librarian. Every time I run into a library col- ferred a few minutes to quietly digest a problem Law School league, everyone wants to know what it is like before plunging in. I am forced to process the and what the differences are. Let me start off by issue, begin working on it, and keep talking Christine Ciambella offering the obligatory disclaimer – these opin- with the patron all at the same time. Like any- Access & Research ions are my own and do not reflect the beliefs thing else, I am getting better with practice. Services Librarian of my employer (present or former). I did solicit In the law firm I had the luxury of sending George Mason opinions from colleagues and am grateful for an attorney back to his/her office with the University School their insight and experience. The two settings promise to bring my research product to them of Law really are quite different, but I’m not prepared later that day. I am often able to do this with to say one is “better” than the other. professors (but not with students). In contrast During my career as a law firm reference to practicing attorneys, the professors generally librarian I specialized in legislative history.
  • Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group

    Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group

    WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN Illustration credits and copyright references for photographs, maps and other illustrations are under negotiation with the following organisations: Dean and Chapter of Westminster Westminster School Parliamentary Estates Directorate Westminster City Council English Heritage Greater London Authority Simmons Aerofilms / Atkins Atkins / PLB / Barry Stow 2 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including St. Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site Management Plan Prepared on behalf of the Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group, by a consortium led by Atkins, with Barry Stow, conservation architect, and tourism specialists PLB Consulting Ltd. The full steering group chaired by English Heritage comprises representatives of: ICOMOS UK DCMS The Government Office for London The Dean and Chapter of Westminster The Parliamentary Estates Directorate Transport for London The Greater London Authority Westminster School Westminster City Council The London Borough of Lambeth The Royal Parks Agency The Church Commissioners Visit London 3 4 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE S I T E M ANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD by David Lammy MP, Minister for Culture I am delighted to present this Management Plan for the Palace of Westminster, Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site. For over a thousand years, Westminster has held a unique architectural, historic and symbolic significance where the history of church, monarchy, state and law are inexorably intertwined. As a group, the iconic buildings that form part of the World Heritage Site represent masterpieces of monumental architecture from medieval times on and which draw on the best of historic construction techniques and traditional craftsmanship.
  • Judicial and Court Statistics 2007 Cm 7467

    Judicial and Court Statistics 2007 Cm 7467

    Judicial and Court Statistics 2007 Judicial and Court Statistics 2007 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor by Command of Her Majesty The Queen September 2008 Cm 7467 £33.45 © Crown Copyright 2008 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and other departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Where we have identified any third party copyright material you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. For any other use of this material please write to Office of Public Sector Information, Information Policy Team, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU or e-mail: [email protected] ISBN: 9 78 010174 672 4 Contents Introductory Note 5 1. Appellate Courts 7 2. High Court – Chancery Division 31 3. High Court – Queen’s Bench Division 41 4. County courts (non family) 53 5. Family Matters 81 6. The Crown Court 103 7. Magistrates’ Courts 135 8. Offices of the Supreme Court 159 9. The Judiciary 171 10. Assessment of litigation costs, and publicly funded legal services 185 Annex A: Data Quality and Sources 197 Judicial and Court Statistics 2006 | Introductory Note Introductory Note This Ministry of Justice report “Judicial and Court Statistics 2007”, presents a comprehensive set of statistics on judicial and court activity in England and Wales during 2007. This report was formerly entitled “Judicial Statistics” (for the 2005 edition and earlier years) and was published by the Department for Constitutional Affairs and its predecessors.
  • The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of

    The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of

    The Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCOTUS) and The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC): A comparative learning tool This resource summarises some of the similarities and differences between the most senior appeal courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. This is an area often explored by students studying Law at Sixth Form/Further Education level. This resource is intended to encourage discussion within groups, and some questions are provided at the end to encourage you to think about the different approaches of the two courts. This resource is offered as material for schools and colleges and is not intended as a comprehensive guide to the statutory position of either Supreme Court or their practices. Queries about the work of UKSC should be directed via our website, www.supremecourt.uk. SCOTUS UKSC When was it The SCOTUS is over 200 years old and The UKSC is five years old and opened established? was established in 1789. on 16 October 2009. It is located in the former Middlesex Guildhall building. The Article III, Section 1, of the American grade II listed building was built in 1913 Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial and was renovated between 2007 and Power of the United States, shall be 2009 to turn the building into a suitable vested in one supreme Court, and in such home for the Supreme Court. inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The highest court of appeal for the UK used to be found in the House of Lords, The Supreme Court of the United States sitting as what was known as the was created in accordance with this Appellate Committee of the House of provision and by authority of the Lords.
  • In the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division

    In the High Court of Justice Queen's Bench Division

    In the High Court of Justice CO Ref: COI 8229/2011 Queen's Bench Division Administrative Court In the matter of an application for Judicial Review The Queen on the application of GREENPEACE LTD versus SECRETARY OF STATE FOR ENERGY AND CLIMATE CHANGE Application for permission to apply for Judicial Review NOTIFICATION of the Judge's decision (CPR Part 54.11, 54.12) Following consideration of the documents lodged by the Claimant, the Acknowledgement of service filed by the Defendant and the correspondence about Dr Weightman's final report Order by the Honourable Mr Justice OUSELEY Permission is hereby refused. Reasons: The case is not arguable for the reasons given in the AOS. The claim does not in reality recognise the role of the ONR and site licensing in dealing with flood protection, off -site supplies and communications. The potential for the 8 sites to be protected against flooding does not prevent a later decision by the ONR or by IPC on its advice that anyone can not be protected, nor does it prevent a decision by IPC that the as yet undefined measures have planning implications which tell against a site. The claim that a comparative safety exercise was required ignores the fundamental judgment that all were potentially safe, and a decision that no examination of the degree of margin was required is not irrational. The consultation was lawful. • The costs of preparing the Acknowledgment of Service are to be paid by the Claimant to the Defendant in the sum of £ 11813; if the application is renewed, it shall be determined at the renewal hearing.
  • The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor

    The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor

    The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law CUA Law Scholarship Repository Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions Faculty Scholarship 2005 Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor Susanna Frederick Fischer The Catholic University, Columbus School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.edu/scholar Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Susanna Frederick Fischer, Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor, 24 PENN. ST. INT’L L. REV. 257 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at CUA Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Scholarly Articles and Other Contributions by an authorized administrator of CUA Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. I Articles I Playing Poohsticks with the British Constitution? The Blair Government's Proposal to Abolish the Lord Chancellor Susanna Frederick Fischer* ABSTRACT This paper critically assesses a recent and significant constitutional change to the British judicial system. The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 swept away more than a thousand years of constitutional tradition by significantly reforming the ancient office of Lord Chancellor, which straddled all three branches of government. A stated goal of this legislation was to create more favorable external perceptions of the British constitutional and justice system. But even though the enacted legislation does substantively promote this goal, both by enhancing the separation of powers and implementing new statutory safeguards for * Susanna Frederick Fischer is an Assistant Professor at the Columbus School of Law, The Catholic University of America, in Washington D.C.
  • Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System

    Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System

    Edinburgh Research Explorer Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System Citation for published version: Walker, N 2010, Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. <http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/299388/0093334.pdf> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publisher Rights Statement: ©Walker, N. (2010). Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 FINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SCOTTISH LEGAL SYSTEM Crown Copyright 2010 ISBN: 978-0-7559-8213-4 Further copies are available from Eli do Rego The Scottish Government Legal System Division 2nd Floor West St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG 0131 244 3839 [email protected] An electronic copy of the full report including