DOCSLIB.ORG

HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11 Pay and Grading: the DCA Deal Inverness London Aberdeen Barnet Edmonton Wood Green Enfield Harrow Hendon Haringey (Highgate) Waltham Forest Romford Snaresbrook Havering Ilford Redbridge Uxbridge Locations in Bow Barking Ealing Stratford Dundee Range 1 are Acton Harmondsworth Brentford listed below Woolwich Isleworth Greenwich Hounslow (Feltham) Richmond Upon Bexley Thames Hatton Cross Stirling Wimbledon Kingston Upon Bromley Thames Glasgow Croydon Edinburgh Berwick upon Tweed Sutton Hamilton Ayr Alnwick Court and Tribunal DCA Offices Morpeth Bedlington Blackfriars Headquarters: DCA / HMCS / Tribunals Bow St. Selborne House Gosforth Brent Newcastle upon Tyne Clive House Hexham Camberwell Green Blaydon North Shields Steel House Central Criminal Court Carlisle Gateshead South Shields Abbey Orchard St. Sunderland Central London Millbank Tower Consett City of London Durham Houghton Le Spring 30 Millbank Peterlee Clerkenwell Maltravers Street Bishop Auckland Penrith Hartlepool Highbury Corner 185 Marylebone Road Workington Newton Aycliffe Horseferry Rd. IL&CFP Darlington Teesside Scotland Office Whitehaven Guisborough Inner London Sessions House Wales Office Thornaby Whitby Lambeth Privy Council Marylebone Public Guardianship Office Kendal Richmond Mayor's & City of London Law Commission Middlesex Guildhall (Theobalds Road) Northallerton Scarborough Royal Courts of Justice Supreme Court Taxing Office Pickering Shoreditch Barrow-in-Furrness (Fetter Lane) South West Balham Statutory Publications Office Bridlington Southwark (Tufton Street) Harrogate South Western Lancaster Jury Central Summoning Bureau Skipton Thames (Pocock Street) Nelson York Fleetwood Wetherby Tower Bridge National Taxing Team Reedley Keighley Wandsworth (Bedford Square) Blackpool Burnley Bingley Leeds Beverley West London Judge Advocate General Accrington Bradford Selby Preston Halifax Kingston upon Hull Willesden (Chancery Lane) Blackburn Rawtenstall Leyland Chorley Goole Legal Services Commission Rochdale Dewsbury Wakefield Pontefract Southport Bury (Grays Inn Road) Bolton Huddersfield Scunthorpe Oldham Grimsby HM Inspectorate of Court Administration Ormskirk Wigan Manchester Doncaster Knowsley Leigh Tameside Barnsley (Millbank Tower) Bootle St Helens Salford Office for Judicial Complaints Liverpool Altrincham (Trafford) Glossop Gainsborough Wallasey Warrington Rotherham Louth Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman Holyhead Llandudno Conwy Prestatyn Widnes Stockport Sheffield & Colwyn Birkenhead Worksop East Retford Judicial Appointments Commission Flint Knutsford Llangefni Rhyl Runcorn Northwich Lincoln Macclesfield Buxton Denbigh Mold Chester Chesterfield Caernarfon Mansfield Skegness Crewe Newark Wrexham Sleaford Newcastle- under-Lyme Stoke on Trent Boston Ilkeston Nottingham Grantham Cromer Pwllheli Derby Oswestry Market Drayton Spalding Bourne Stafford Burton upon Trent Melton Mowbray Loughborough Kings Lynn Dolgellau Welshpool Shrewsbury Cannock Coalville Telford Tamworth Rutland Stamford Great Yarmouth Aldridge Leicester Wisbech Norwich Swaffham Walsall Atherstone Wolverhampton Hinckley Peterborough Newtown West Bromwich Market Lowestoft Dudley Sutton Coldfield Harborough Corby Aberystwyth Stourbridge Birmingham Nuneaton Warley Thetford Ludlow Kidderminster Halesowen Coventry Rugby Kettering Ely Redditch Solihull Huntingdon Mildenhall Warwick Leamington Spa Wellingborough Bury St. Daventry Northampton Edmunds Llandrindod Wells Worcester Stratford upon Avon Cambridge Cardigan Evesham Towcester Bedford Hereford Banbury Milton Keynes Sudbury Ipswich Llandovery Brecknock Tewkesbury Hitchin Harwich Carmarthen Cheltenham Bicester Stevenage Haverfordwest Abergavenny Gloucester Luton Colchester Ammanford Merthyr Tydfil Tredegar Aylesbury Hertford Coleford Witney Hemel Harlow Witham Aberdare Abertillery Stroud Oxford Hempstead St. Albans Llanelli Neath Blackwood Pontypool Cirencester Cheshunt Chelmsford Rhondda Dursley Amersham Epping Swansea Cwmbran Watford Pontypridd Chepstow Didcot Port Talbot High Wycombe Caerphilly Newport Wantage Bridgend Yate Swindon Basildon Southend Cardiff Slough Bristol Chippenham Maidenhead Grays Flax Bourton Reading London Barry Dartford Gravesend Bath Newbury Bracknell Staines Weston-Super-Mare Devizes Medway(Chatham) Thanet (Margate) Epsom Sittingbourne Woking Trowbridge Aldershot Sevenoaks Maidstone Canterbury Basingstoke Reigate Wells Frome Guildford Dorking Minehead Redhill Andover Tunbridge Wells Bridgwater Alton Dover Crawley Ashford Barnstaple Salisbury Horsham Folkestone Winchester Taunton Yeovil Haywards Heath Sherborne Eastleigh Southampton Cullompton Lewes Hastings Lyndhurst Fareham Havant Honiton Blandford Hove Wimborne Worthing Brighton Eastbourne Isles of Scilly Okehampton Portsmouth Chichester Exeter Bridport Dorchester Poole Bournemouth Pay Range Key Newport St. Marys Wareham Launceston Weymouth Newton Abbot Range 1 Bodmin Plymouth Liskeard Torquay & Newton Abbot Range 2 Totnes Range 3 Truro Camborne Range 4 Penzance Range 5 © Crown Copyright 2007.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School
    volume 48, number 3 Spring 2005 Making the LIKE SEVERAL OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE AT very different pressures. For me, the greatest Transition THE GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL pressure is thinking on my feet while law stu- from Law OF LAW LIBRARY, I have recently made the dents and public patrons stand before me Firm to change from law firm librarian to law school expecting instant answers. I have always pre- librarian. Every time I run into a library col- ferred a few minutes to quietly digest a problem Law School league, everyone wants to know what it is like before plunging in. I am forced to process the and what the differences are. Let me start off by issue, begin working on it, and keep talking Christine Ciambella offering the obligatory disclaimer – these opin- with the patron all at the same time. Like any- Access & Research ions are my own and do not reflect the beliefs thing else, I am getting better with practice. Services Librarian of my employer (present or former). I did solicit In the law firm I had the luxury of sending George Mason opinions from colleagues and am grateful for an attorney back to his/her office with the University School their insight and experience. The two settings promise to bring my research product to them of Law really are quite different, but I’m not prepared later that day. I am often able to do this with to say one is “better” than the other. professors (but not with students). In contrast During my career as a law firm reference to practicing attorneys, the professors generally librarian I specialized in legislative history.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group
    WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN Illustration credits and copyright references for photographs, maps and other illustrations are under negotiation with the following organisations: Dean and Chapter of Westminster Westminster School Parliamentary Estates Directorate Westminster City Council English Heritage Greater London Authority Simmons Aerofilms / Atkins Atkins / PLB / Barry Stow 2 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including St. Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site Management Plan Prepared on behalf of the Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group, by a consortium led by Atkins, with Barry Stow, conservation architect, and tourism specialists PLB Consulting Ltd. The full steering group chaired by English Heritage comprises representatives of: ICOMOS UK DCMS The Government Office for London The Dean and Chapter of Westminster The Parliamentary Estates Directorate Transport for London The Greater London Authority Westminster School Westminster City Council The London Borough of Lambeth The Royal Parks Agency The Church Commissioners Visit London 3 4 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE S I T E M ANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD by David Lammy MP, Minister for Culture I am delighted to present this Management Plan for the Palace of Westminster, Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site. For over a thousand years, Westminster has held a unique architectural, historic and symbolic significance where the history of church, monarchy, state and law are inexorably intertwined. As a group, the iconic buildings that form part of the World Heritage Site represent masterpieces of monumental architecture from medieval times on and which draw on the best of historic construction techniques and traditional craftsmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of
    The Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCOTUS) and The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC): A comparative learning tool This resource summarises some of the similarities and differences between the most senior appeal courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. This is an area often explored by students studying Law at Sixth Form/Further Education level. This resource is intended to encourage discussion within groups, and some questions are provided at the end to encourage you to think about the different approaches of the two courts. This resource is offered as material for schools and colleges and is not intended as a comprehensive guide to the statutory position of either Supreme Court or their practices. Queries about the work of UKSC should be directed via our website, www.supremecourt.uk. SCOTUS UKSC When was it The SCOTUS is over 200 years old and The UKSC is five years old and opened established? was established in 1789. on 16 October 2009. It is located in the former Middlesex Guildhall building. The Article III, Section 1, of the American grade II listed building was built in 1913 Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial and was renovated between 2007 and Power of the United States, shall be 2009 to turn the building into a suitable vested in one supreme Court, and in such home for the Supreme Court. inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The highest court of appeal for the UK used to be found in the House of Lords, The Supreme Court of the United States sitting as what was known as the was created in accordance with this Appellate Committee of the House of provision and by authority of the Lords.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System Citation for published version: Walker, N 2010, Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. <http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/299388/0093334.pdf> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publisher Rights Statement: ©Walker, N. (2010). Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 FINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SCOTTISH LEGAL SYSTEM Crown Copyright 2010 ISBN: 978-0-7559-8213-4 Further copies are available from Eli do Rego The Scottish Government Legal System Division 2nd Floor West St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG 0131 244 3839 [email protected] An electronic copy of the full report including
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court; Annual Report and Accounts 2013–2014 HC 36
    The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 4 July 2016. HC 32 © Crown Copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@ nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.uk Print ISBN 9781474132770 Web ISBN 9781474132787 ID 11051611 06/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Front cover image © Kevin Leighton The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 4 contents one two three four FOREWORD AND OVERVIEW: OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf; Last Access: June 24, 2014
    International Journal For Court Administration Vol. 6 No. 2 Thirteenth Issue ISSN 2156-7964 Rwandan Gacaca Court Rwamagana District, Eastern Province, Rwanda IACA The Official Publication of the International Association For Court Administration www.iaca.ws International Association For Court Administration International Journal For Court Administration International Association For Court Administration IJCA is an electronic journal published on the IACA website (www.iaca.ws). As its name suggests, IJCA OFFICERS focuses on contemporary court administration and management. Its scope is international, and the Editors welcome submissions from court officials, judges, justice ministry officials, academics and others Cathy Hiuser whose professional work and interests lie in the practical aspects of the effective administration of justice. President Jeffrey A. Apperson Markus Zimmer Philip Langbroek Linda Wade-Bahr Chief Executive Officer Executive Editor Managing Editor Technical Editor Hon. Vladimir Freitas [email protected] [email protected] President-Elect Sheryl L. Loesch Andreas Lienhard Luis Maria Palma Anne Wallace Leisha Lister Chief Administrative Officer Journal Editor Journal Editor Journal Editor Journal Editor Carline Ameerali Vice President, Europe Editorial Board IACA Journal Norman Meyer Vice President, North America Dr. Pim Albers, Senior Project Leader, Institute for Global Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands Andrew Phelan Jeffrey A. Apperson, Vice President for International Affairs NCSC, Virginia, USA, IACA Board Executive CEO Vice President, South Asia & Australia Dr. Carl Baar, Professor Emeritus, Brock University Adjunct Professor of Political Science, York University, Toronto, Collin Ijoma, Ontario, Canada Vice President, Africa Dr. Dacian Dragos, Jean Monnet Associate Professor, Centre for Good Governance Studies, Babes Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania Mark Beer Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Judiciary Rising: Constitutional Change in the United Kingdom
    Copyright 2014 by Erin F. Delaney Printed in U.S.A. Vol. 108, No. 2 JUDICIARY RISING: CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE IN THE UNITED KINGDOM Erin F. Delaney ABSTRACT—Britain is experiencing a period of dramatic change that challenges centuries-old understandings of British constitutionalism. In the past fifteen years, the British Parliament enacted a quasi-constitutional bill of rights; devolved legislative power to Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland; and created a new Supreme Court. British academics debate how each element of this transformation can be best understood: is it consistent with political constitutionalism and historic notions of parliamentary sovereignty, or does it usher in a new regime that places external, rule-of- law-based limits on Parliament? Much of this commentary examines these changes in a piecemeal fashion, failing to account for the systemic factors at play in the British system. This Article assesses the cumulative force of the many recent constitutional changes, shedding new light on the changing nature of the British constitution. Drawing on the U.S. literature on federalism and judicial power, the Article illuminates the role of human rights and devolution in the growing influence of the U.K. Supreme Court. Whether a rising judiciary will truly challenge British notions of parliamentary sovereignty is as yet unknown, but scholars and politicians should pay close attention to the groundwork being laid. AUTHOR—Assistant Professor, Northwestern University School of Law. For helpful conversations during a transatlantic visit at a very early stage of this project, I am grateful to Trevor Allan, Lord Hope, Charlie Jeffery, Lord Collins, and Stephen Tierney.
    [Show full text]
  • CRIMINAL JUSTICE and TAXATION Ii
    i CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND TAXATION ii OXFORD MONOGRAPHS ON CRIMINAL LAW AND JUSTICE Series Editor: Andrew Ashworth CBE QC, Emeritus Vinerian Professor of English Law, All Souls College, Oxford This series aims to cover all aspects of criminal law and procedure including criminal evidence. The scope of this series is wide, encompassing both practical and theoretical works. OTHER TITLES IN THIS SERIES In Search of Criminal Punishment and Freedom Responsibility Alan Brudner Ideas, Interests, and Institutions Nicola Lacey Prosecuting Domestic Violence A Philosophical Analysis Character in the Criminal Trial Michelle Madden Dempsey Mike Redmayne Abuse of Process and Judicial Stays Preventive Justice of Criminal Proceedings Andrew Ashworth and Andrew L.- T. Choo Lucia Zedner A Philosophy of Evidence Law Homicide and the Politics Justice in the Search for Truth of Law Reform Hock Lai Ho Jeremy Horder The Criminal Justice System The Insecurity State and Healthcare Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right Edited by Charles A. Erin and to Security in the Criminal Law Suzanne Ost Peter Ramsay Rethinking Imprisonment Manifest Madness Richard Lippke Mental Incapacity in the Criminal Law Killing in Self- Defence Arlie Loughnan Fiona Leverick The Ethics of Plea Bargaining Richard L. Lippke iii Criminal Justice and Taxation PETER ALLDRIDGE Drapers’ Professor of Law, Queen Mary University of London 1 iv 1 Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP, United Kingdom Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries © P.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLESEX COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Records, 1774-93 Reel M581
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT MIDDLESEX COUNTY RECORD OFFICE Records, 1774-93 Reel M581 Middlesex County Record Office 1 Queen Anne’s Gate Buildings Dartmouth Street London SW1H 9BS National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1964 HISTORICAL NOTE The Middlesex County Record Office evolved from the collection of records of Middlesex Quarter Sessions which the Clerk of the Peace was required to preserve, together with other records such as enclosure awards. At the direction of a committee of the justices of peace, the old records were first sorted and listed in the 1880s. The new Middlesex Guildhall at Westminster, which was equipped with muniment rooms, opened in 1913 and in 1923 a full-time assistant was placed in charge of the records. The first county archivist was appointed in 1946, initially on a part-time basis. In the late 1950s the record office moved into new premises in Dartmouth Street. In 1965 the new Greater London Council took over the record offices of the London County Council and the defunct Middlesex County Council. However they remained in separate premises until 1979, when the Dartmouth Street premises were sold. Both archives were then housed in County Hall. In 1982 the Greater London Record Office moved to a new building in Clerkenwell. In 1986 the Greater London Council was abolished and the record office became the responsibility of the City of London Corporation. Its name was changed to the London Metropolitan Archives in 1997. In addition to the Middlesex Sessions records, selected records held in the Greater London Record Office were filmed by the Australian Joint Copying Project and can be found on reels M3087-3105.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court Annual Report 2013
    The Supreme Court AnnualCourt ReportAccountsThe Supreme and 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 May 2013. HC 3 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Crown Copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102983234 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2557463 05/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 4 Contents one two three four FOREWORD AND SETTING DIRECTION: THE SUPREME COURT SERVING THE UK AND INCREASING INTRODUCTION OUR
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: an Overview of Key Themes, with References to Further Material
    The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom: an overview of key themes, with references to further material Educational resource for Higher Education Institutions May 2012 “A thousand years of judgment stretch behind – The weight of rights and freedoms balancing With fairness and with duty to the world: The clarity time-honoured thinking brings. New structures but an old foundation stone…” (Lines for The Supreme Court, 2009, Andrew Motion – then Poet Laureate) Page 1 of 10 The Supreme Court, which opened in October 2009 as the successor to the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords, is the Highest Court of Appeal in the United Kingdom, dealing with civil cases from the whole of the United Kingdom and criminal cases from England, Wales and Northern Ireland. This is a resource provided by the Communications team of the UK Supreme Court, nothing contained in it should be considered as an official opinion of the Court. 1. Creation of The UK Supreme Court Since the Appellate Jurisdiction Act of 1876, the Lords of Appeal in Ordinary (or Law Lords, as they were known) conducted the judicial work of the House as members of The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords1. While the Law Lords in recent times abstained from speaking or voting on politically sensitive matters, when a Law Lord retired, they were then free to participate in debates on legislation and public policy, as peers. The creation of the Supreme Court by Parliament was highly symbolic and sought to counter the perception that there was not a clear enough separation of powers between the legislature and the judiciary.
    [Show full text]
  • Courts and Tribunals
    COURTSCOURTS ANDAND TRIBUNALSTRIBUNALS XII SEMINARIO DE ESTUDIO COMPARADO DE SISTEMAS JUDICIALES Y DE COOPERACIÓN JUDICIAL INTERNACIONAL A TRAVÉS DEL LENGUAJE JURÍDICO Águilas 2010 ConstitutionalConstitutional ReformReform ActAct 20052005 Key changes brought in by the Act: - Duty on government ministers to uphold the independence of the judiciary. - Reform of the post of Lord Chancellor, transferring his judicial functions to the President of the Courts of England and Wales – a new title given to the Lord Chief Justice. - Establishment of a new, independent Supreme Court, separate from the House of Lords and with its own independent appointments system, staff and budget. - A new independent Judicial Appointments Commission, responsible for selecting candidates to recommend for judicial appointment to the Secretary of State for Justice (now Minister of Justice). - A new Judicial Appointments and Conduct Ombudsman, responsible for investigating and making recommendations concerning complaints about the judicial appointments process, and the handling of judicial conduct complaints ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 2 BODIES RESPONSIBLE FOR JUSTICE ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 3 CourtsCourts andand tribunalstribunals Lord Chancellor’s Department Ð Department for Constitutional Affairs (created 2003, started 2005) Ð Ministry of Justice (as of 9th May 2007) ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 4 MinistryMinistry ofof JusticeJustice ((MoJMoJ)) MINISTRY OF JUSTICE (as of 9th May 2007): ¾Replaces Lord Chancellor’s Department & Department for Constitutional Affairs. ¾Responsibilities: reforms to Constitution, administration of courts, appointment of judiciary (Judicial Appointments Commission, JAC), human rights, data protection, freedom of information, coroners, local government elections, etc. ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 5 LordLord ChancellorChancellor Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice: Rt. Hon. Jack Straw ÁguilasÁguilas 2010 2010 6 LordLord ChancellorChancellor ¾The Lord Chancellor is now the government minister responsible to Parliament for the courts and the justice system.
    [Show full text]