DOCSLIB.ORG

The Supreme Court Annual Report 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Supreme Court Annual Report 2013 The Supreme Court AnnualCourt ReportAccountsThe Supreme and 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 20 May 2013. HC 3 London: The Stationery Office £21.25 © Crown Copyright 2013 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ doc/open-government-licence/ or email: [email protected]. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.gov.uk ISBN: 9780102983234 Printed in the UK by The Stationery Office Limited on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 2557463 05/13 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2012–2013 4 Contents one two three four FOREWORD AND SETTING DIRECTION: THE SUPREME COURT SERVING THE UK AND INCREASING INTRODUCTION OUR OBJECTIVES AND JUSTICES BEYOND: JURISDICTION ACCESSIBILITY: OPERATING CONTEXT AND CASEWORK (A) UKSC COMMUNICATIONS AND (B) JCPC EXTERNAL RELATIONS Foreword 06 Our mission 09 Appointments 15 (A) UKSC 19 A warm welcome to 37 Introduction 07 Our strategic objectives 09 during the year Overview of 19 visitors Our values 10 Valedictories for Lord 16 jurisdictions Educating and 37 Brown, Lord Phillips Rules and Practice 19 inspiring Maintaining effective 11 and Lord Walker relationships with all Directions Explaining our role 38 jurisdictions in the Possible changes to 17 The procedure 20 Working with media 40 the selection process United Kingdom and for appealing: A user-focused 41 the jurisdictions which Other appointments 17 permission to appeal online presence use the JCPC (PTA) applications Listening to our users 42 The United Kingdom 11 Appeals 20 Maintaining links 43 Judicial Committee 12 Sitting Days 21 with Middlesex of the Privy Council References to the 25 (JCPC) Court of Justice of the Policy Developments 13 European Union Size of panels hearing 26 cases Cases and Judgments 26 (B) JCPC 32 Overview of 32 jurisdictions Rules and Practice 32 Directions The procedure for 32 Appealing Appeals 33 References 34 Sitting Days 34 Cases and Judgments 34 Supreme Court Annual Report 2012–2013 5 five six seven eight annex SHARING GOOD SUPPORTING THE COURT: MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTS PRACTICE: CORPORATE SERVICES COMMENTARY INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Judicial visitors 45 Our governance 53 Management 65 Remuneration 70 Jurisdictions where 99 (Delegations, Who’s who: 54 Commentary Report the Privy Council is Individuals) Membership of Statement of 75 the final Court of Lawyers and 46 Management Board Accounting Officer’s Appeal Academics and Committees responsibilities Diplomats, Ministers 46 Our People 56 Governance 75 and Officials Our information and 58 Statement Sharing good practice: 48 resources, and how Audit Certificate 80 Justices’ international we manage them Statement of 82 links Our building, your 60 Parliamentary Supply German 48 building Statement of 83 Constitutional Court Dealing with 63 Comprehensive Net India 46 complaints Expenditure Visits by individual 49 Statement of 84 Justices of the UKSC Financial Position International 51 Statement of Cash 85 Association for Court Flows Administration Statement of Changes 86 European Judicial 51 in Taxpayers' Equity assistant Notes to the 87 Costs 51 Department Resource Accounts Supreme Court Annual Report 2012–2013 6 foreword BY THE PRESIDENT OF THE SUPREME COURT LORD NEUBERGER Having succeeded Lord Phillips in October also go to the Lord Chief Justices of England 2012, I am writing my first foreword to an and Wales, and of Northern Ireland, and to Annual Report of the UKSC and JCPC. the Lord President of the Court of Session for their assistance in making judges available I would like to start by paying tribute to my for this purpose. predecessor for all that he did to establish the UKSC as an institution separate from the The Supreme Court was very sorry to say United Kingdom Parliament, serving all the goodbye to Lord Brown in the early part jurisdictions of the United Kingdom. Whilst of the year, and to Lord Walker who had there is much about the work here that is to retire towards the end of the year, each familiar from my time as a Lord of Appeal having reached the age of 75. Their wisdom in Ordinary between 2007 and 2009, there and experience will be greatly missed by us have been significant improvements in the all. A reference to the valedictory remarks way in which the Justices go about their made about Lord Walker in court on 14 business, as well as in the way in which the March can be found elsewhere in the report. Justices are supported. Above all, there have been great improvements to the openness, The report summarises the substantial work visibility and accessibility of the Court. that has taken place in order to fulfil the Business Plan for the UKSC and JCPC. My All the Justices deserve gratitude for their thanks, and those of all the Justices, go to hard work during a challenging few months. Jenny Rowe, the Chief Executive and the staff We have been short of a Justice since October of the Supreme Court for their hard work and when Lord Dyson succeeded me as Master support over the past year. of the Rolls. During the period since then the Court has had to consider a number of heavy We look forward to the forthcoming year. and demanding cases. For this, and other reasons, I welcome the fact that the selection commission process has been completed and that two new Justices will be sworn in on 9 April. I am very grateful to those judges from England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland who have sat in both the UKSC and the JCPC to help us out. My thanks Supreme Court Annual Report 2012–2013 7 introduction BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE JENNY ROWE I have pleasure in presenting the Annual There have been some changes in Report and Accounts for the UKSC and JCPC staff over the year. The Deputy Head of for the financial year 2012–13. Communications was promoted to head that team and we welcomed a new Deputy This has been a year of consolidation in some Head who joined from outside the Court. Our areas, whilst in others we have continued temporary Assistant Librarian left to take up to make changes of our own, as well as a post at Lincoln’s Inn and her successor took to respond to significant changes in the up his post in November. We also appointed a environment in which we operate. We have new Finance Manager and are well advanced now achieved full integration of the UKSC in the process to identify a new Information/ and JCPC staff and, in the Registry, all staff Customer Services Officer to replace one who have been trained to support the work of left at Christmas. both courts. The new finance system has bedded in and has successfully supported this We also, of course, had to say goodbye to year's audit. We have continued to review our some Justices. Lord Brown retired on 9 April, external contracts with a view to ensuring the as the longest-serving Judge in the UK. He most appropriate service for our specific needs is much missed by all. Whilst congratulating and the best value for money. The details are Lord Dyson on his appointment as Master covered elsewhere in the Report but we are of the Rolls we were sorry to see him go. pleased with the outcomes we have achieved, Lord Phillips retired from the Court on 30 which will make a contribution to our being September, but has continued to keep closely able to manage within our Spending Review in touch with the Court and developments settlement for the next financial year. which affect our operation and administration. I remain personally grateful for all the support During the year we have been engaged with he provided during his tenure as President. We the Ministry of Justice on potential changes have also recently seen Lord Walker retire and to the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. We we wish him a long and happy retirement. anticipate those changes will form part of the Crime and Courts Act, which is expected to In April Lord Carnwath replaced Lord Brown; receive Royal Assent in April/May 2013. and in October we welcomed Lord Neuberger who became the second President of the Towards the end of this year we welcomed Supreme Court. our 250,000th visitor to the building. This demonstrates the success we have achieved The success of any organisation depends to in enhancing the openness and accessibility of a large extent on its staff and I am grateful the highest court in the United Kingdom, as to all permanent members of staff, as well well as of the JCPC. as those staff who provide essential services, such as security, cleaning, and catering under outsourced contracts, for everything they have done to ensure the Supreme Court and JCPC work smoothly. Supreme Court Annual Report 2012–2013 8 Supreme Court Annual Report 2012–2013 9 section one setting direction: our objectives and operating context Our Mission The mission of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC) is to ensure that the President, Deputy President and Justices of the Court can deliver just and effective determination of appeals heard by the Court, in ways which also best develop the Rule of Law and the administration of justice.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31 July 2016 Contents
    THE GLASGOW SCHOOL OF ART (Company Register No.SC002271) Annual Report and Financial Statements Year Ended 31 July 2016 Contents: Office Bearers and Governors 1 Strategic Report 2 to 8 Directors’ Report (Incorporating the Responsibilities of the Board of Governors) 9 to 11 Statement of Corporate Governance and Internal Control 12 to 14 Governors’ Biographies 15 to 18 Independent Auditor’s Report 19 to 20 Group and School Statement of Comprehensive Income 21 Group and School Statement of Changes in Reserves 22 Group and School Balance Sheet 23 Group Statement of Cash Flows 24 Statement of Principal Accounting Policies and Estimation Techniques 25 to 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 31 to 46 OFFICE BEARERS AND GOVERNORS A Company Limited by Guarantee (Company Register No.SC002271) Patron H.R.H. The Prince of Wales, Duke of Rothesay Hon. President Mr Stewart Grimshaw Hon. Vice President Professor Anthony Jones Chair Ms Muriel Gray BA (Hons) Vice Chair Sir Muir Russell KCB FRSE Ms Alison Lefroy Brooks BA (Hons) ACA MCT (until February 2016) Director Professor Tom Inns BEng (Hons) DIC MDes (RCA) PhD FRSA Professor Ken Neil MA (Hons) MFA PhD PGCert FHEA FRSA Deputy Director (from September 2016) Director of Finance and Resources Mr Eliot S Leviten BSc. (Hons) FCA (until 31 December 2016) Mr Alastair Milloy BAcc FCCA (from 1 January 2017) Registrar and Secretary Dr Craig Williamson LLB (Hons), MSc, PhD Chairs of Committees 2015/16 (and early 2016/17) Audit Ms Alison Lefroy Brooks BA (Hons) ACA MCT (until February 2016) Sir Muir Russell KCB
    [Show full text]
  • HR Map V28020 Sea Tint.FH11
    Pay and Grading: the DCA Deal Inverness London Aberdeen Barnet Edmonton Wood Green Enfield Harrow Hendon Haringey (Highgate) Waltham Forest Romford Snaresbrook Havering Ilford Redbridge Uxbridge Locations in Bow Barking Ealing Stratford Dundee Range 1 are Acton Harmondsworth Brentford listed below Woolwich Isleworth Greenwich Hounslow (Feltham) Richmond Upon Bexley Thames Hatton Cross Stirling Wimbledon Kingston Upon Bromley Thames Glasgow Croydon Edinburgh Berwick upon Tweed Sutton Hamilton Ayr Alnwick Court and Tribunal DCA Offices Morpeth Bedlington Blackfriars Headquarters: DCA / HMCS / Tribunals Bow St. Selborne House Gosforth Brent Newcastle upon Tyne Clive House Hexham Camberwell Green Blaydon North Shields Steel House Central Criminal Court Carlisle Gateshead South Shields Abbey Orchard St. Sunderland Central London Millbank Tower Consett City of London Durham Houghton Le Spring 30 Millbank Peterlee Clerkenwell Maltravers Street Bishop Auckland Penrith Hartlepool Highbury Corner 185 Marylebone Road Workington Newton Aycliffe Horseferry Rd. IL&CFP Darlington Teesside Scotland Office Whitehaven Guisborough Inner London Sessions House Wales Office Thornaby Whitby Lambeth Privy Council Marylebone Public Guardianship Office Kendal Richmond Mayor's & City of London Law Commission Middlesex Guildhall (Theobalds Road) Northallerton Scarborough Royal Courts of Justice Supreme Court Taxing Office Pickering Shoreditch Barrow-in-Furrness (Fetter Lane) South West Balham Statutory Publications Office Bridlington Southwark (Tufton Street) Harrogate
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016–2017
    Annual Report 2016–2017 Annual Report 2016–2017 Published pursuant to section 18 of the Judiciary and Courts (Scotland) Act 2008 Laid before the Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers SG/2017/132 © Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland (JABS) copyright 2017 The text in this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as JABS copyright and the document title specified. Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland Thistle House 91 Haymarket Terrace Edinburgh EH12 5HD E-mail: [email protected] This publication is only available on our website at www.judicialappointments.scot Published by the Judicial Appointments Board for Scotland, September 2017 Designed in the UK by LBD Creative Ltd Annual Report 2016–2017 Contents Our aims ii Foreword 1 Introduction and Membership 3 Committees and Groups 6 Diversity 11 Appointment Rounds 12 Meetings and Outreach 20 Tribunals 21 Complaints 22 Freedom of Information 23 Secretariat 24 Website 25 Financial Statement 26 Annex 1: Board Members and Lay Selection Panel Members 27 Annex 2: Board Member Attendance 33 i i JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS BOARD FOR SCOTLAND Our aims are: To attract applicants of the highest calibre, to encourage diversity in the range of those available for selection, and to recommend applicants for appointment to judicial office on merit through processes that are fair, transparent and command respect.
    [Show full text]
  • University Court Minute of Meeting Held on 6 October 2004 in The
    Court 10 November 2004 Paper 1* UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW University Court Minute of Meeting held on 6 October 2004 in the Senate Room Present: Mrs Joy Travers (Chancellor’s Assessor) Sir Muir Russell (Principal) Dr Jacqueline Atkinson Professor David Bennett Mr Norman Berry Professor John Briggs Mr J Scott Cairns Professor Andrew Christie Professor Mike French Dr Alastair Hunter Margaret McCafferty Dr Geoffrey Moores Mr John Andrew Murray (President, Students’ Representative Council) Dr Keith Nimmo Mrs Margaret RH Paxton Ms Kate Phillips Mr David Ross Mr Ian Russell Mr Michael Sandford Professor David Watt Mr Donald Wilson Mr Ben Zielinski (Assessor, Students’ Representative Council) In attendance: Mr Bob Cunningham (Interim Director of Human Resources), Mr Ian Hawkins (Administrative Officer) Miss Jan Hulme (Academic Secretary) Professor Peter Holmes (Vice-Principal) Professor Robin Leake (Vice-Principal) Professor Malcolm McLeod (Vice-Principal) Professor Chris Morris (Vice-Principal) Professor Anton Muscatelli (Vice-Principal Strategy and Budgeting) Professor Andrew Nash (Vice-Principal and Clerk of Senate) Mr David Newall (Secretary of Court) Annie Vaz (Acting Director of Publicity Services). Apologies: Members: Dr Craig Reedie, Dr Mona Siddiqui. Attendees: Mr Chris Rusbridge (Director of Information Services), Mr Robert Wilson (Director of Estates and Buildings). 1. WELCOMES Court welcomed Mr David Ross, Mr Donald Wilson, Professor John Briggs, Professor Mike French and Mr John Andrew Murray to their first meeting of Court as members of Court. Court also welcomed Mr David Newall to his first meeting of Court as Secretary of Court. 2. MINUTE OF THE LAST MEETING Court approved the minute of the meeting held on 23 June 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Transition from Law Firm to Law School
    volume 48, number 3 Spring 2005 Making the LIKE SEVERAL OF MY COLLEAGUES HERE AT very different pressures. For me, the greatest Transition THE GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL pressure is thinking on my feet while law stu- from Law OF LAW LIBRARY, I have recently made the dents and public patrons stand before me Firm to change from law firm librarian to law school expecting instant answers. I have always pre- librarian. Every time I run into a library col- ferred a few minutes to quietly digest a problem Law School league, everyone wants to know what it is like before plunging in. I am forced to process the and what the differences are. Let me start off by issue, begin working on it, and keep talking Christine Ciambella offering the obligatory disclaimer – these opin- with the patron all at the same time. Like any- Access & Research ions are my own and do not reflect the beliefs thing else, I am getting better with practice. Services Librarian of my employer (present or former). I did solicit In the law firm I had the luxury of sending George Mason opinions from colleagues and am grateful for an attorney back to his/her office with the University School their insight and experience. The two settings promise to bring my research product to them of Law really are quite different, but I’m not prepared later that day. I am often able to do this with to say one is “better” than the other. professors (but not with students). In contrast During my career as a law firm reference to practicing attorneys, the professors generally librarian I specialized in legislative history.
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Principals Receive 10% Pay Rise
    Glasgow University 10th February 2009 Scottish Student Newspaper of the Year Folk Maestros Vintage classics Oisin Kealy and Lewis Porteous on Eleanor Mitchell promotes individual the highlights of Celtic Connections style over copycat chic Music Lifestyle Glasgow Uni occupied by Police fail activists George Binning A SERIES OF STUDENT-DRIVEN to advise protests and occupations in aid of Gaza have prompted drastic action by universities across Scotland. On Wednesday February 4 students of Strathclyde University of attackSarah Smith First-year English Literature staged an occupation of Strathclyde’s Exclusive student, Becky Sharp, told Guardian registry and on Sunday January 25 why she feels it is important for the the Stop the War Coalition (SWC) police and the University to notify and Scottish Palestinian Solidarity THE RESIDENTS OF MURANO students when attacks like this occur. Campaign (SPSC) also staged an Street Student Village were shocked She said: “I think it was irrespon- occupation of the BBC headquarters to learn this week that they had sible for them to not alert the Murano in Glasgow. not been informed of an attack Street residents of the attack as it is Today 10 February around 30 which took place close to one of its important that we know of the threats students of Glasgow University main entrances. that surround the area. were continuing their occupa- A 29-year old woman was inde- “I have, so far, been quite casual tion of the Computing Department cently assaulted whilst walking over about being alone and in the area of the University. The occupation the canal footbridge in the early late at night, and hearing about the was a response to the events of hours of Saturday January 31.
    [Show full text]
  • Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group
    WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN Illustration credits and copyright references for photographs, maps and other illustrations are under negotiation with the following organisations: Dean and Chapter of Westminster Westminster School Parliamentary Estates Directorate Westminster City Council English Heritage Greater London Authority Simmons Aerofilms / Atkins Atkins / PLB / Barry Stow 2 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN The Palace of Westminster and Westminster Abbey including St. Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site Management Plan Prepared on behalf of the Westminster World Heritage Site Management Plan Steering Group, by a consortium led by Atkins, with Barry Stow, conservation architect, and tourism specialists PLB Consulting Ltd. The full steering group chaired by English Heritage comprises representatives of: ICOMOS UK DCMS The Government Office for London The Dean and Chapter of Westminster The Parliamentary Estates Directorate Transport for London The Greater London Authority Westminster School Westminster City Council The London Borough of Lambeth The Royal Parks Agency The Church Commissioners Visit London 3 4 WESTMINSTER WORLD HERITAGE S I T E M ANAGEMENT PLAN FOREWORD by David Lammy MP, Minister for Culture I am delighted to present this Management Plan for the Palace of Westminster, Westminster Abbey and St Margaret’s Church World Heritage Site. For over a thousand years, Westminster has held a unique architectural, historic and symbolic significance where the history of church, monarchy, state and law are inexorably intertwined. As a group, the iconic buildings that form part of the World Heritage Site represent masterpieces of monumental architecture from medieval times on and which draw on the best of historic construction techniques and traditional craftsmanship.
    [Show full text]
  • Archive of Events at the Research Institute of Irish and Scottish Studies
    Archive of events at The Research Institute of Irish and Scottish Studies (RIISS) October 1999 - December 2005 October 5, 1999 Northern Ireland: The Prospect Before Us Aberdeen has nearly 70 academic staff in three faculties with research interests in Irish and/or Scottish topics. Professor Steve Bruce, Department of Sociology, begins this Lunchtime Seminar series which allows those scholars associated with the Institute through the Associated Academic Staff Scheme to present their latest research results to an audience drawn from several disciplines. October 8 -9, 1999 The Irish Act of Union (1801) Joint Interdisciplinary Conference with the Research Institute of Irish and Scottish Studies, Aberdeen, and the Keough Institute, University of Notre Dame, USA. Newman House, Dublin. Booking information from the Institute. October 18, 1999 Spenser and Ireland: Between Race and Culture Landscape & Empire Seminar organised by Dr Glenn Hooper, RIISS, and Dr Willy Maley, University of Glasgow. October 25, 1999 Telling the Story of Scotland Public discussion featuring distinguished academics, educationalists and journalists on Scottish history timed to coincide with the publication of T M Devine’s The Scottish Nation 1700-2000 by Penguin. Sponsored by Blackwell’s Bookshops and Penguin UK. King’s College Conference Centre. October 26, 1999 The Idea of a Democratic Intellect Lunchtime Seminar with Professor Gordon Graham, Department of Philosophy. November 2, 1999 A Profile of the ModernCatholic Community in Scotland Lunchtime Seminar with Iain Paterson, Department Sociology, University of Aberdeen. During the summer, the distinguished composer, James MacMillan, caused a storm when he argued that anti-Catholicism was rife in Scottish society. In the subsequent debate there was much anecdote but little hard evidence produced.
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court of the United States and the Supreme Court Of
    The Supreme Court of the United States of America (SCOTUS) and The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC): A comparative learning tool This resource summarises some of the similarities and differences between the most senior appeal courts in the United States and the United Kingdom. This is an area often explored by students studying Law at Sixth Form/Further Education level. This resource is intended to encourage discussion within groups, and some questions are provided at the end to encourage you to think about the different approaches of the two courts. This resource is offered as material for schools and colleges and is not intended as a comprehensive guide to the statutory position of either Supreme Court or their practices. Queries about the work of UKSC should be directed via our website, www.supremecourt.uk. SCOTUS UKSC When was it The SCOTUS is over 200 years old and The UKSC is five years old and opened established? was established in 1789. on 16 October 2009. It is located in the former Middlesex Guildhall building. The Article III, Section 1, of the American grade II listed building was built in 1913 Constitution provides that "[t]he judicial and was renovated between 2007 and Power of the United States, shall be 2009 to turn the building into a suitable vested in one supreme Court, and in such home for the Supreme Court. inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." The highest court of appeal for the UK used to be found in the House of Lords, The Supreme Court of the United States sitting as what was known as the was created in accordance with this Appellate Committee of the House of provision and by authority of the Lords.
    [Show full text]
  • (Scotland) Act 2002 – Request for Information
    Mr S Cross [email protected] 5 March 2010 Our Ref: FOI 2010/32 – F0085861 Dear Mr Cross, Re: Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002 – Request for Information Thank you for your email which was received by the University on 6 February timed 23:50 hours, requesting the following information: “I have just read in the Glasgow Herald that the Principal has accepted a total salary package of £283,000 a rise of 8% on the previous year for the same post. At a time when the rest of the staff are having to accept 0.5% pay packages this seems a bit off. I have 2 questions that i would like to ask: 1) Are these figures true? and 2) What are the total salary packages of the following directorate level staff, what pay rises have they accepted this year and what are the terms and conditions of their employment in respect of meeting performance targets. Or put bluntly how much do they earn and if they are getting pay rises greater than 0.5% over last year, why? Andrea Nolan - Deputy Vice Chancellor Frank Coton - VP for Learning and Teaching Steve Beaumont - VP R+E Neil Juster - VP Strategy and Resources Christine Lowther - Directory of Student Services Susan Stewart - Director of Corporate Communications Fiona Docherty - International Director Sandy MacDonald - Director IT Services and last but not least David Newall - Secretary of Court” DATA PROTECTION AND FREEDOM OF INFORMATION OFFICE Main Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ Data Protection: Telephone: 0141-330-3111 E-Mail: [email protected] Freedom of Information: Telephone: 0141-330-2523 E-Mail: [email protected] The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401 University’s Response 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System
    Edinburgh Research Explorer Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System Citation for published version: Walker, N 2010, Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. <http://scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/299388/0093334.pdf> Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publisher Rights Statement: ©Walker, N. (2010). Final Appellate Jurisdiction in the Scottish Legal System. Scottish Government. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 FINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION IN THE SCOTTISH LEGAL SYSTEM Crown Copyright 2010 ISBN: 978-0-7559-8213-4 Further copies are available from Eli do Rego The Scottish Government Legal System Division 2nd Floor West St Andrew’s House Edinburgh EH1 3DG 0131 244 3839 [email protected] An electronic copy of the full report including
    [Show full text]
  • The Supreme Court; Annual Report and Accounts 2013–2014 HC 36
    The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 Annual Report presented to Parliament pursuant to Section 54(1) of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005. Accounts presented to the House of Commons pursuant to Section 6(4) of the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000. Accounts presented to the House of Lords by Command of Her Majesty. Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 4 July 2016. HC 32 © Crown Copyright 2016 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@ nationalarchives.gsi.gov.uk. Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at: [email protected] You can download this publication from www.supremecourt.uk Print ISBN 9781474132770 Web ISBN 9781474132787 ID 11051611 06/16 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Front cover image © Kevin Leighton The Supreme Court Annual Report and Accounts 2015–2016 4 contents one two three four FOREWORD AND OVERVIEW: OBJECTIVES
    [Show full text]