Submerged Prehistoric Landscapes and Underwater Site Discovery: Reevaluating the ‘Danish Model’ for International Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submerged Prehistoric Landscapes and Underwater Site Discovery: Reevaluating the ‘Danish Model’ for International Practice Journal of Island & Coastal Archaeology, 5:253–270, 2010 Copyright © 2010 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1556-4894 print / 1556-1828 online DOI: 10.1080/15564894.2010.506623 FORUM Submerged Prehistoric Landscapes and Underwater Site Discovery: Reevaluating the ‘Danish Model’ for International Practice Jonathan Benjamin School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK ABSTRACT Paleoenvironmental studies of late Pleistocene climate change and postglacial sea-level rise have coincided with and inspired archaeolog- ical fieldwork in submarine environments. Underwater archaeologi- cal contributions have significantly enhanced the Mesolithic-Neolithic record in and around Europe; however, despite recent advancements, a clear approach to broadly investigate submerged prehistoric landscapes remains undefined. While a specific survey strategy has been tested in southern Scandinavia, these practices lack some considerations if they are to be productively applied on an international scale. Through a systematic identification of physical and cultural variables and a practical, common-sense approach, this paper re-evaluates the ‘Danish model’ for submerged prehistoric landscape archaeology and presents a framework for the identification of locations for underwater archae- ological survey and site discovery. In addition to the methodological evaluation, specific research priorities are introduced. Keywords underwater archaeology, Mesolithic, Neolithic, submerged prehistoric land- scapes, archaeological prospection, sea-level rise Received 13 May 2009; accepted 28 May 2010. Address correspondence to Jonathan Benjamin, School of History, Classics and Archaeology, University of Edinburgh, Doorway 4, Teviot Place, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Scotland, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 253 Jonathan Benjamin INTRODUCTION Whileitmaybetemptingtotreat‘underwater archaeology’ as a single sub-discipline within archaeology, fieldwork conducted in subma- rine environments should not be considered homogeneous. Variations in scope and prac- tice abound within archaeology underwater and the terminology used to define the sub- fields can be confusing since ‘Underwater Archaeology’ is often used synonymously with ‘Maritime Archaeology’ or ‘Nautical Archaeology’. In his seminal work, Muck- elroy (1978) diagramed the sub-disciplines of archaeology underwater and proposed the term for non-ship, non-maritime related archaeology conducted underwater to be simply “archaeology under water” (Figure 1). Despite this identified distinction, there ex- ists a preconceived notion about underwater archaeology both within popular culture as well as the archaeological community: “To most people maritime archaeology means wrecks, spectacular time capsules like the Mary Rose. Less appreciated are the exten- sive prehistoric landscapes...” (Miles 2004: xiii). Numerous summaries or methodologi- Figure 1. Fields of archaeology concerned with cal publications are devoted to the broader underwater methodology (redrawn topic of archaeology underwater (e.g., Bass after Muckelroy 1978). Nautical Ar- 1966; Blot 1996; Bowens 2009; Dean 1992; chaeology and Maritime Archaeol- Delgado 1997; Gianfrotta and Pomey 1981; ogy are not always underwater as Goggin1960;Green1990;RuppeandBarstad´ illustrated by areas A, B, and C. Sub- 2002; St. John Wilkes 1971; Volpe 1999), merged sites, which can be historic or prehistoric, and are not found within and focus mainly on maritime or nautical 1 the scope of Nautical or Maritime archaeology. Archaeology are indicated by area F. Recent paleoenvironmental studies of late Pleistocene climate change and post- glacial sea-level rise (e.g., Christensen 1995; Dawson 1984; Fairbanks et al. 1989; Flem- 1983, 1995). The pioneering work of these ming 1968; Lambeck et al. 1998, 2001; archaeologists and ‘submerged prehistori- Pirazolli 1985, 1996; Shackelton et al. 1984; ans’ can be considered amongst the most Shennan and Horton 2002; van Andel 1989, technically remarkable fieldwork and have 1990) have coincided with innovative work lead to highly informative archaeological on submerged prehistoric coastal landscapes discoveries in Northern Europe, the Mediter- (e.g., Andersen 1980, 1985; Dunbar et al. ranean Basin, and North America.2 1992; Faught 1988, 2004; Fischer 1987, Despite the advancements in underwa- 1993, 1995; Flemming 1983; Galili et al. ter research, a systematic search strategy to 1993, 1997; Grøn and Skarrup 1991; Hartz broadly investigate submerged prehistoric and Lubke¨ 1995; Hudson 1979; Josenhans landscapesislacking.Thisismainlyduetothe et al. 1997; Larsson 1983; Lubke¨ 2001, 2003; scale of the problem (the sheer number and Masters 1983; Momber 2000, 2005; Raban combined area of archaeological landscapes 1965, 1983; Ruppe 1980, 1988; Skaarup now underwater), the expense of systematic 254 VOLUME 5 • ISSUE 2 • 2010 Submerged Prehistoric Site Discovery investigation underwater, and the fact that mouths, as well as available material for tool submarine environments vary dramatically production. Examples of these materials in- by location. The numerous considerations clude pebbles and river rocks, driftwood, and determining archaeological potential make a other organic materials used for structures; universal methodology virtually impossible. tools; and fuel. Furthermore, recent work in Still, there are fundamental aspects of any the archaeology of submerged cultural land- region that can be evaluated in order to scapes has lead researchers to suggest that consider its appropriateness for an in-depth geomorphological conditions for the preser- assessment for potential cultural resources vation of archaeological and palaeoenviron- on its continental shelf. These methods, mental material exist throughout the world discussed in detail below, can be applied and that new techniques are “providing the on a pan-European, or indeed international momentum for a rapidly expanding field of scale,throughacombinationofsophisticated investigation” (Bailey and Flemming 2008: analysis, common sense, and simple familiar- 2153). Indeed in their recent publication ity with individual landscapes and local re- Archaeology of the Continental Shelf: Ma- sources. Based on the necessary practicality rine Resources, Submerged Landscapes and and flexibility, this paper presents a frame- Underwater Archaeology, Bailey and Flem- work for identifying appropriate variables in ming neatly summarize previous work on order to evaluate coastal regions for potential this topic and, more importantly, broadly ad- prehistoric underwater archaeological site dress geological/geomorphological consid- discovery. erations and issues surrounding submerged site preservation and discovery. Since research in submerged cultural ‘STONE AGE’ ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE landscapes is relatively recent within the SUBMERGED COAST wider field of archaeology, methodology for investigating underwater prehistory is still in development. Furthermore it is often the The importance of the coast to prehistoric case that the initial discovery of material hunter-gatherer populations has been a topic takes place accidentally through commercial of significant research in recent decades (e.g. and/or amateur maritime activity (see Flem- Bailey 2004; Bailey and Parkington 1988; ming 2004; Masters and Flemming 1983). Bonsall 1996; Erlandson 2001; Erlandson and Buildingonmethodsandtechniquesfromthe Fitzpatrick 2006; Larsson 1995; Milner 2005; research of the past four decades, current and Pluciennik 2008; Rowley-Conwy 1983; van future generations of prehistorians working Andel 1989; Zvelebil 1998). Advantages of on land and underwater will continue to coastal living have been defined by Bailey develop the field. Erlandson and Fitzpatrick (2004) and can be simplified as follows: (2006: 14) rightly remind the scientific com- munity that careful consideration and plan- 1. Transportation and communication; this ning for research in submerged terrestrial encompasses trade and social activities, landscapes is essential because “repeated and includes seaborne migrations and failures may threaten the availability of future exchange; funding.” Additionally, it is the responsibility 2. Access to food resources, specifically the of a professional archaeologist to employ the abundance and variety of marine and appropriate staff and equipment needed to terrestrial plants and animals; and carry out proper archaeological fieldwork 3. Access to other (non-food) resources. in submarine environment. The question remains: how can submerged prehistoric This includes fresh water in high water- coastal landscapes be addressed by archae- table environments and at coastal river- ologists? JOURNAL OF ISLAND & COASTAL ARCHAEOLOGY 255 Jonathan Benjamin SOUTHERN SCANDINAVIA AND THE Fischer 1987, 1993, 1995, 1997; Grøn 1995; ‘PRESUPPOSITION MODEL’ FOR Grøn and Skarrup 1991; Larsson 1983, 1995; SUBMERGED PREHISTORIC SITE Malm 1995; Skaarup 1983; Sørensen 1996) DISCOVERY and the Baltic coast of northern Germany (Hartz and Lubke¨ 1995; Lubke¨ 2001, 2003). Prehistoric coastal settlements differ in size, Systematic underwater excavations of artifact quantity and quality, seasonal indica- prehistoric sites in the southwest Baltic were tors, and overall preservation compared with initiated in the 1970s by the Langeland Mu- inland sites (Fischer 1995). There is therefore seum in the South Funen Archipelago (Grøn little doubt that valuable and original infor- 1995;Skarrup1995).Bytheearly1990sabout mation has come from underwater archaeol-
Recommended publications
  • REMOTE SENSING a Bibliography of Cultural Resource Studies
    REMOTE SENSING A Bibliography of Cultural Resource Studies Supplement No. 0 REMOTE SENSING Aerial Anthropological Perspectives: A Bibliography of Remote Sensing in Cultural Resource Studies Thomas R. Lyons Robert K. Hitchcock Wirth H. Wills Supplement No. 3 to Remote Sensing: A Handbook for Archeologists and Cultural Resource Managers Series Editor: Thomas R. Lyons Cultural Resources Management National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, D.C. 1980 Acknowledgments This bibliography on remote sensing in cultural Numerous individuals have aided us. We es­ resource studies has been compiled over a period pecially wish to acknowledge the aid of Rosemary of about five years of research at the Remote Sen­ Ames, Marita Brooks, Galen Brown, Dwight Dra- sing Division, Southwest Cultural Resources Cen­ ger, James Ebert, George Gumerman, James ter, National Park Service. We have been aided Judge, Stephanie Klausner, Robert Lister, Joan by numerous government agencies in the course Mathien, Stanley Morain and Gretchen Obenauf. of this work, including the Department of the In­ Douglas Scovill, Chief Anthropologist of the Na­ terior, National Park Service, the U.S. Geological tional Park Service has also encouraged and sup­ Survey EROS Program, and the National Aero­ ported us in the pursuit of new research directions. nautics and Space Administration (NASA). Fi­ Christina Allen aided immeasurably in the com­ nancial support has been provided by these pilation of this bibliography, not only in procuring agencies as well as by the National Geographic references (especially those dealing with under­ Society (Grant No. 1177). The Department of An­ water remote sensing), but also in proofreading the thropology, University of New Mexico, and the entire manuscript.
    [Show full text]
  • Bog Sites and Wetland Settlement During the Mesolithic: Research from a Bog in Central Scania, Southern Sweden
    LARS LARSSON · ARNE SJÖSTRÖM BOG SITES AND WETLAND SETTLEMENT DURING THE MESOLITHIC: RESEARCH FROM A BOG IN CENTRAL SCANIA, SOUTHERN SWEDEN THE BOG COMPLEX AGERÖDS MOSSE AND RÖNNEHOLMS MOSSE The bogs Ageröds Mosse and Rönneholms Mosse together form a north-westerly arm of the Ringsjön Basin of central Scania, southernmost part of Sweden, the bottom of which is approximately 25 m deeper than the surrounding terrain (fig.1). The whole bog complex, which, with its total area of 12 km2, is one of Scania’s largest, actually constitutes a single bog. It indicates the extent of a prehistoric lake, within the Fig. 1 Location of selected sites in the bogs Ageröds Mosse and Rönneholms Mosse (Skåne län/S). The white area north-west of Lake Ringsjön, on the enlarged map, shows the extent of the ancient lake before it filled in. Topographic elevation on enlarged map: 5m. ARCHÄOLOGISCHES KORRESPONDENZBLATT 41 · 2011 457 Fig. 2 Air photograph of the north-western section of the former lake, with just visible river Rönne å dividing the bog complex into Ageröds Mosse, in the back - ground, and Rönneholms Mosse, in the foreground, where peat is extracted in elongated parcels. – (Photo A. Sjöström). region of Ringsjön that was later filled by organic sediment, ultimately becoming transformed into a raised bog. The river Rönne å, the main drainage of the Lake Ringsjön system, divides the basin into a smaller northern part, i.e. Ageröds Mosse, and a larger southern part, i.e. Rönneholms Mosse (fig. 2). The lake that included the bogs Ageröds Mosse and Rönneholms Mosse was shallow, which resulted in a successive filling up with organic material that started during the Preboreal chronozone and finished during the Subboreal chronozone (Nilsson 1967).
    [Show full text]
  • Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners Indberetning På
    Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægter er ekskl. ordinært § 21 a tilskud, vareafgift til havnene samt moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter i Billetindtægter i perioden marts- perioden marts- september i 2019 (i september i 2020 (i Kommune Rute 1.000 kr.) 1.000 kr.) Assens Baagø-Assens Fanø Fanø-Esbjerg Faaborg-Midtfyn Bjørnø-Faaborg Faaborg-Midtfyn Lyø-Avernakø-Faaborg Haderslev Aarø-Aarøsund Hedensted Hjarnø-Snaptun Holbæk Orø-Holbæk Holbæk Orø- Hammer bakker Horsens Endelave-Snaptun Kalundborg Havnsø-Sejerø Kalundborg Havnsø-Nekselø Langeland Strynø-Rudkøbing Lolland Fejø-Kragenæs Lolland Femø-Kragenæs Lolland Askø-Bandholm Læsø Læsø-Frederikshavn Norddjurs Anholt-Grenaa Odder Tunø-Hou Samsø Hou-Samsø Skive Fur-Branden Slagelse Agersø-Stigsnæs Slagelse Omø-Stigsnæs Struer Venø-Kleppen Svendborg Hjortø-Svendborg 1 3 Svendborg Skarø-drejø-Svendborg 139 111 Ærø Birkholm-Marstal Ærø Ærøskøbing-Svendborg Ærø Søby-Faaborg Ærø Søby-Fynshav Ærø Marstal-Rudkøbing Aabenraa Barsø-Barsø-Landing Aalborg Egholm-Aalborg Kommuners indberetning på godsområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Beregning af mindreindtægter Samlede mindreindtægte r i 2020 (i 1.000 kr.) 2 -28 Kommunenavn: Svendborg Kommuners indberetning på passagerområdet til beregning af økonomisk kompensationsbehov som følge af COVID-19 Billetindtægt er ekskl. ordinært § 21 b tilskud og moms Beregning af mindreindtægter Billetindtægter
    [Show full text]
  • Science in Archaeology: a Review Author(S): Patrick E
    Science in Archaeology: A Review Author(s): Patrick E. McGovern, Thomas L. Sever, J. Wilson Myers, Eleanor Emlen Myers, Bruce Bevan, Naomi F. Miller, S. Bottema, Hitomi Hongo, Richard H. Meadow, Peter Ian Kuniholm, S. G. E. Bowman, M. N. Leese, R. E. M. Hedges, Frederick R. Matson, Ian C. Freestone, Sarah J. Vaughan, Julian Henderson, Pamela B. Vandiver, Charles S. Tumosa, Curt W. Beck, Patricia Smith, A. M. Child, A. M. Pollard, Ingolf Thuesen, Catherine Sease Source: American Journal of Archaeology, Vol. 99, No. 1 (Jan., 1995), pp. 79-142 Published by: Archaeological Institute of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/506880 Accessed: 16/07/2009 14:57 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=aia. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit organization founded in 1995 to build trusted digital archives for scholarship. We work with the scholarly community to preserve their work and the materials they rely upon, and to build a common research platform that promotes the discovery and use of these resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Archaeology W Iny the New Deal
    NEW DEAL ARCHAEOLOGY A NEWW ARCHAEOLOGYY IN THE NEWW DEAL THE RISE OF HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGYY IN THE 1930S Benjamin C. Pykles Benjamin C. Pykles is ann Assistantt Professorr inn thee Departmentt off Anthropologyy att the State University off New York att Potsdam. istorical archaeology—the archaeologyy off the Mod- only standing architectural ern World (approximately the last 500 years off remains from the seven- Hhuman history)—has its disciplinaryy roots in the teenth century. It was not historic preservation movementt off the United States during until 1934, however, when the late nineteenth and earlyy twentieth centuries (Pykles the National Park Service 2008). Historical archaeology’s true institutional beginnings, (NPS) secured possession of however, are tied to the federally sponsored archaeologyy proj- the main portion of ects conducted under the auspices off the Neww Deal pro- Jamestown Island, that a grams off the 1930s. Chieff among those projects in terms of large-scale archaeological the developmentt off historical archaeology in the United program at the site was insti- States were the 1934–1941 excavations at Jamestown, Vir- tuted, relying on the labor of ginia, directed byy J. C. Harrington (Figure 1). During this young African-American critical time in the historyy off the field, Harrington estab- men enrolled in the Civilian lished some off the fundamental methods and practices used Conservation Corps (CCC). Figuree 1. Jeann Carll Harrington by historical archaeologists todayy and did much to promote Because there were few, iff any, (1901-1998), the “founding and legitimize the emerging discipline. As a resultt off these professionally trained archae- ffather”” off historicall archaeology efforts, Harrington is widely recognized as the “founding ologists with any experience, in the Unitedd States.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology, History, and Architectural History in Maine
    (CR) General Information – Archaeology, History, and Architectural History in Maine MAINE PREHISTORIC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES: INTRODUCTION AND MANAGEMENT By Arthur Spiess Maine Historic Preservation Commission (1999) INTRODUCTION Before the arrival of Europeans, Maine’s Native Americans left no written records, indeed few lasting records except for archaeological sites. The first historic record of them was written by European explorers in the 16th century, so we refer to the archaeology of Maine’s Native American inhabitants as “prehistoric” archaeology. The methods of prehistoric archaeologists differ from those of historians. Rather than studying written documents primarily, archaeologists study the material remains of extinct cultures. Archaeological sites were usually not created with the intent of communicating anything to future generations, so we must leave some of the most basic questions about prehistoric people unanswered. For example, we shall never know their names for themselves, or the details of their religious beliefs. We can infer some things about their lives from anthropological accounts of similar cultures elsewhere in the world, or from reading the earliest historic documents from Maine. Mostly we are reliant on the archaeological record, which can be shockingly honest and unmistakable, or frustratingly obscure. To understand Maine’s prehistoric archaeological sites, the threats to them, and the means for their protection, the following paragraphs provide an introduction to Maine prehistory and archaeological site location. The first Native Americans to live in Maine moved in from the south or west about 11,000 years ago as the land recovered from its last glaciation, and as tundra and open spruce woodland vegetation cover grew enough to support the large and small game they hunted (including mastodon and caribou).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution
    On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Bar-Yosef, Ofer. 1998. “On the Nature of Transitions: The Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution.” Cam. Arch. Jnl 8 (02) (October): 141. Published Version doi:10.1017/S0959774300000986 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12211496 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Cambridge Archaeological Journal 8:2 (1998), 141-63 On the Nature of Transitions: the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic and the Neolithic Revolution Ofer Bar-Yosef This article discusses two major revolutions in the history of humankind, namely, the Neolithic and the Middle to Upper Palaeolithic revolutions. The course of the first one is used as a general analogy to study the second, and the older one. This approach puts aside the issue of biological differences among the human fossils, and concentrates solely on the cultural and technological innovations. It also demonstrates that issues that are common- place to the study of the trajisition from foraging to cultivation and animal husbandry can be employed as an overarching model for the study of the transition from the Middle to the Upper Palaeolithic. The advantage of this approach is that it focuses on the core areas where each of these revolutions began, the ensuing dispersals and their geographic contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-Learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By
    A Lesson in Stone: Examining Patterns of Lithic Resource Use and Craft-learning in the Minas Basin Region of Nova Scotia By © Catherine L. Jalbert A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies for partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Department of Archaeology Memorial University of Newfoundland May 2011 St. John’s Newfoundland Abstract Examining the Late Woodland (1500-450 BP) quarry/workshop site of Davidson Cove, located in the Minas Basin region of Nova Scotia, a sample of debitage and a collection of stone implements appear to provide correlates of the novice and raw material production practices. Many researchers have hypothesized that lithic materials discovered at multiple sites within the region originated from the outcrop at Davidson Cove, however little information is available on lithic sourcing of the Minas Basin cherts. Considering the lack of archaeological knowledge concerning lithic procurement and production, patterns of resource use among the prehistoric indigenous populations in this region of Nova Scotia are established through the analysis of existing collections. By analysing the lithic materials quarried and initially reduced at the quarry/workshop with other contemporaneous assemblages from the region, an interpretation of craft-learning can be situated in the overall technological organization and subsistence strategy for the study area. ii Acknowledgements It is a pleasure to thank all those who made this thesis achievable. First and foremost, this thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and support provided by my supervisor, Dr. Michael Deal. His insight throughout the entire thesis process was invaluable. I would also like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for Fish of the Right Age: Developing Predictive Modeling for Submerged Sites Using GIS, Salmon Genetics, and the Human Ecology of Salmon
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jon Krier for the degree of Master of Arts in Applied Anthropology presented on April 2, 2018. Title: Looking for Fish of the Right Age: Developing Predictive Modeling for Submerged Sites Using GIS, Salmon Genetics, and the Human Ecology of Salmon Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Andrew Gerkey Abstract A major challenge to the study of the peopling of the Americas is that much of the Bering Land Bridge (Beringia), the geographic area that people migrating from Northeast Asia into North America would presumably have passed through, is now submerged due to sea-level rise since the last glacial maximum. The scale of this submerged land mass further adds to the challenge of how to search for archaeological evidence of the human migration. This thesis proposes an approach to submerged site discovery in Beringia intended to reduce the total area that needs to be considered in a predictive model by focusing on a key resource, salmon. The cultural importance of salmon to Indigenous peoples across the North Pacific is broadly acknowledged, and increasingly, that importance is being incorporated into hypotheses regarding the peopling of the Americas. The concept of salmon as a “magnet” resource is used here as a way to prioritize submerged areas for further analysis toward a predictive site discovery model. This paper incorporates studies of modern salmon DNA, ethnography, archaeology, and geo- spatial analyses into the preliminary phases of a predictive model. The framework of the Danish Model (Benjamin 2010) for submerged site discovery is adapted here for Beringia. The analyses discussed here are aimed at identifying areas within the larger region that would be suitable for further phase III and IV investigation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations
    Anthropology 6146 Sec 211G/ CBD 234 Dr. Susan D. deFrance Spring 2016 1350-B Turlington Hall/1112 Turlington [email protected] Office hours Tues & Thursday 2-3:30 pm and by appt. The Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations Course Objectives and Goals: This seminar examines issues pertaining to human maritime adaptations in archaeological, ethnohistoric and ethnographic contexts. Issues to be examined include: 1) Definitions of Maritime Adaptations 2) History of Investigations 3) Characteristics of Marine Resources 4) Technology and Organization of Maritime Predation 5) Limitations on Maritime Subsistence 6) Ownership, Territory, and Resource Rights 7) Population, Settlement and Site Size 8) Economic and Political Organization 9) Complexity of Maritime Societies Populations and cultures exhibiting maritime adaptations, among others, include: Jomon, Pacific Islands, Yagan, Andean Coast, Chumash, Northwest Coast, Eskimo/Aleut, Red Paint Archaic, Calusa, European Mesolithic, Coastal Maya Readings are available on the course elearning/Sakai site. Written Work and Class Presentations: 1) Weekly Assignments: 1-2 page review (critique, evaluation – not summaries) of ALL weekly readings. These are due at the start of class; late papers are not accepted without prior permission. 2) Each session students will be assigned one reading to present in detail (max. 15 minutes). Oral presentations will rotate between students depending on the number of reading assignments per week. All students must be prepared to discuss all the weekly readings at class time. 3) Final Paper (due APRIL 25 AT 4 PM- NO late papers, No incompletes, emergencies excluded) – on an approved topic related to the Archaeology of Maritime Adaptations. Final Paper should follow American Antiquity format for bibliography with a minimum of 2 references per page.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long-Term Decline in Terms of Trade and the Neolithisation of Northern Europe Serge Svizzero
    The long-term decline in terms of trade and the neolithisation of Northern Europe Serge Svizzero To cite this version: Serge Svizzero. The long-term decline in terms of trade and the neolithisation of Northern Europe. Scandinavian Economic History Review, 2015, 63 (3), pp.260-279. 10.1080/03585522.2015.1008566. hal-02150104 HAL Id: hal-02150104 https://hal.univ-reunion.fr/hal-02150104 Submitted on 7 Jun 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. The long-term decline in terms of trade and the neolithisation of Northern Europe Serge Svizzero* Faculté de Droit et d’Economie, Université de La Réunion, 15 Avenue René Cassin, BP 7151. 97715 Saint Denis Cedex, France While agriculture spread quite rapidly from the Levant to most parts of Europe during the sixth millennium, its adoption was delayed to the fourth millennium in Northern Europe, an area inhabited by complex hunter-gatherers (HGs) – mainly the Ertebølle culture. This hiatus leads us to reject diffusion by migration or acculturation. It favours integrationist models of contact between foragers and farmers and attributes the shift to agriculture to social competition between HGs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Natural History of the Wadden Sea
    A natural history of the Wadden Sea Riddled by contingencies Karsten Reise People who are always praising the past And especially the times of faith as best Ought to go back to the middle ages and be burned at the stake as witches and sages. Stevie Smith (1902-1971) Contents 4 Preface by Jens Enemark 50 Chapter 5 Beginning of a new wadden alliance? 6 Contents in a clamshell. A few preliminary comments by the author 60 Chapter 6 How natural is wadden nature? 7 Introduction 70 Chapter 7 What does the future hold 10 Chapter 1 for the Wadden Sea? Why natural history? 80 Conclusions and 22 Chapter 2 recommendations Contingency in natural history What is contingency? 84 The Author / Acknowledgements 34 Chapter 3 On the origin of the Wadden Sea 86 Endnotes 42 Chapter 4 Invited to drown 88 Bibliography Hoofdstuk Preface It is a privilege to write the preface of this booklet by Karsten Contingency is a central notion in Reise’s work and vision. Reise A natural history of the Wadden Sea. Riddled by contingencies. It refers to space­and­time coincidences and accidental events. It is the fourth booklet in a series that is being published to mark Contingency is almost always involved in natural patterns. The the occasion of the special lectures being held at the symposia natural history of the Wadden Sea displays such contingencies. organised by the Wadden Academy. It cannot be understood as a self­sustaining and resilient system with an inbuilt capability to find a natural balance. Attention to Karsten Reise delivered the keynote address entitled ‘Turning contingency will strengthen realism and promote prudence tides: A natural history of the Wadden Sea’ at the 13th Inter­ when it comes to projections for the future, Karsten Reise argues.
    [Show full text]