DOCSLIB.ORG

Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant Intake Improvements – Schedule B Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant Intake Improvements – Schedule B Environmental Assessment ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT – DRAFT Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant Intake Improvements – Schedule B Environmental Assessment Prepared for City of Ottawa October 2015 CH2M HILL Canada Limited 1101 Prince of Wales Drive Suite 330 Ottawa ON K2C 3W7 CH2M HILL CANADA LIMITED • COMPANY PROPRIETARY Contents Section Page 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................... 1‐1 1.2 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 1‐1 1.3 Ontario’s Environmental Assessment Act........................................................................ 1‐1 1.4 Municipal Class EA ........................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.4.1 Municipal Class EA Planning Process .................................................................. 1‐2 1.4.2 Municipal Class EA Project Schedules ................................................................. 1‐5 1.5 Canadian Environmental Assessment Act ....................................................................... 1‐6 1.6 Project Approach ............................................................................................................. 1‐6 1.6.1 Phase 1 – Problem/Opportunity Statement ....................................................... 1‐7 1.6.2 Phase 2 – Alternative Solutions .......................................................................... 1‐7 1.6.3 Phase 5 – Implementation .................................................................................. 1‐8 2. Background .......................................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Problem/Opportunity Statement .................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1 Study Area ........................................................................................................................ 2‐1 2.1.1 Lemieux Island .................................................................................................... 2‐1 2.1.2 Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant ............................................................ 2‐2 2.1.3 Ottawa River ....................................................................................................... 2‐3 3. Environmental Inventories ................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1 Social/Cultural .................................................................................................................. 3‐1 3.1.1 Social ................................................................................................................... 3‐1 3.1.2 Cultural................................................................................................................ 3‐1 3.2 Natural Environment ....................................................................................................... 3‐2 3.2.1 Bathymetry ......................................................................................................... 3‐2 3.2.2 Aquatic and Terrestrial Ecosystems .................................................................... 3‐3 3.2.3 Soil and Groundwater ......................................................................................... 3‐3 3.3 Technical .......................................................................................................................... 3‐3 3.3.1 Geotechnical ....................................................................................................... 3‐3 3.3.2 Ice Conditions ..................................................................................................... 3‐5 4. Alternative Solutions ............................................................................................................ 4‐1 4.1 Identification of Potential Alternatives ............................................................................ 4‐1 4.1.1 Alternative 1: Do Nothing ................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1.2 Alternative 2: Proximity to Shore Intake (Berm Solution) .................................. 4‐2 4.1.3 Alternative 3: Deep Water Intake Under Ice Cover ............................................ 4‐2 4.1.4 Alternative 4: Deep Water Intake Beyond Ice Cover .......................................... 4‐3 4.1.5 Alternative 5: Ice Boom ...................................................................................... 4‐3 4.2 Summary of Alternatives ................................................................................................. 4‐4 5. Short‐Listed Alternatives ...................................................................................................... 5‐1 5.1 Eliminated Long‐Term Alternatives ................................................................................. 5‐1 5.1.1 Alternative 1 ‐ Do Nothing .................................................................................. 5‐1 5.1.2 Alternative 5 – Ice Boom .................................................................................... 5‐1 5.2 Short‐listed Alternatives .................................................................................................. 5‐2 6. Detailed Evaluation of Short‐listed Alternatives .................................................................... 6‐1 6.1 Multi‐Criteria Tool ............................................................................................................ 6‐1 650389_WT0804151025OTT CH2M HILL CANADA LIMITED • COMPANY PROPRIETARY III CONTENTS Section Page 6.2 Multi‐Criteria Analysis Set Up and Evaluation Scoring .................................................... 6‐1 6.2.1 Evaluation Criteria .............................................................................................. 6‐2 6.2.2 Criteria Weightings ............................................................................................. 6‐3 6.2.3 Scoring ................................................................................................................ 6‐4 6.3 Evaluation Summary ........................................................................................................ 6‐4 6.4 Preliminary Recommendation ......................................................................................... 6‐7 6.4.1 Long‐Term Preliminary Recommendation .......................................................... 6‐7 6.4.2 Short‐Term Preliminary Recommendation ......................................................... 6‐7 7. Summary of Impacts and Mitigation Measures ..................................................................... 7‐1 7.1 Long‐term Preliminary Recommendation – Deep Water Intake Beyond Ice Cover ........ 7‐1 7.1.1 Technical Performance ....................................................................................... 7‐1 7.1.2 Project Implementation ...................................................................................... 7‐1 7.1.3 Social Environment ............................................................................................. 7‐3 7.1.4 Natural Environment .......................................................................................... 7‐4 7.1.5 Economics ........................................................................................................... 7‐6 7.2 Short‐Term Preliminary Recommendation – Ice Boom ................................................... 7‐7 7.2.1 Technical Performance ....................................................................................... 7‐7 7.2.2 Project Implementation ...................................................................................... 7‐7 7.2.3 Social Environment ............................................................................................. 7‐7 7.2.4 Natural Environment .......................................................................................... 7‐7 7.2.5 Economics ........................................................................................................... 7‐7 8. Stakeholder Consultation ..................................................................................................... 8‐1 8.1 Notice of Commencement of EA ..................................................................................... 8‐1 8.2 Public Information Centre................................................................................................ 8‐1 8.3 Technical Advisory Meetings ........................................................................................... 8‐1 8.4 Notice of Completion ....................................................................................................... 8‐2 9. References ............................................................................................................................ 9‐1 Appendices A List of Stakeholders and Review Agencies B Notices C Public Information Center Documents Tables 4‐1 Summary of Alternatives 5‐1 Alternative Solution Descriptions 6‐1 Intake Improvements Multi‐Criteria Analysis Parameters 6‐2 Evaluation of Alternatives 6‐3 Alternative Solution Rankings – Multi‐Criteria Analysis Results 7‐1 Construction Selection
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preliminary Heritage Value Assessment: Prince of Wales Bridge
    – DRAFT DRAFT - PRELIMINARY HERITAGE VALUE ASSESSMENT PRINCE OF WALES BRIDGE, OTTAWA, ON - GATINEAU, QC 2.1. HERITAGE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2. LAND USE PLANNING ................................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. HERITAGE RESOURCE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................... 11 4.2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ..................................................................................... 12 4.3. IMPACT OF PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT ON IDENTIFIED HERITAGE VALUE: SUMMARY ............................ 13 4.4. OPPORTUNITIES FOR MITIGATION ............................................................................................................. 15 4.5. PRECENDENCE & LIMITATIONS .................................................................................................................. 16 4.6. CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................................. 16 APPENDIX “A” - 125TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE OPENING OF THE POW BRIDGE ...................................................... 18 APPENDIX “B” - PRINCE OF WALES BRIDGE ............................................................................................................ 29 APPENDIX “C” - SLEEPING PRINCE - A
    [Show full text]
  • A Look Back on Ottawa's Railway Heritage
    Heritage Ottawa NEWSLETTER Dedicated to Preserving Our Built Heritage Winter 2005 Volume 32, No. 1 A look back on Ottawa’s Railway Heritage By David Jeanes ne hundred and fifty years ago on Christmas O Day, 1854, scheduled rail service first began on the Bytown and Prescott railway. The line linked Ottawa to Montreal and the United States via Ogdensburg and a year later to both Montreal and Toronto via Prescott. Without this railway link, Ottawa likely would not have become the capital of Canada and its lumber industry would not have developed into the largest in the world by the end of the nineteenth century. But how much of the architectural and engineering heritage of Ottawa’s railways remains from the early years? Last spring, one of the oldest pieces from that era was destroyed when an 1854 stone arch under an abutment of the old railway bridge from Photo: David Jeanes New Edinburgh was demolished due to concerns CPR 1898 railway bridge over Green’s Creek about the safety of the public pathway which passed beneath it. A bronze plaque commemorating both two attractive stone arch bridges of the same date the first railway and the bridge piers which remain cross Green’s Creek near Highway 417. The O-Train standing in the river will soon be erected at the site still uses a hundred-year-old steel bridge, brought by the National Capital Commission (NCC). here from Magog, Quebec in 1914, over the Rideau Other hundred-year and older railway bridges River at Carleton University. can be found around the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Doors Open Ottawa 2017 Guide
    Two days. Over 150 buildings. Free admission. Presented by DOORS OPEN OTTAWA 2017 Doublespace Photography June 3 and 4 FREE Ottawa Citizen shuttle bus to nearly 70 sites. On June 3 and 4, you and your family have the opportunity to Doors Open Ottawa unlocks more than 150 of the area’s most architecturally interesting and explore more than 150 of Ottawa’s historically significant buildings, many of which are not normally open to the public. most interesting places, including 40 new sites, free of charge. Embassies, places of worship, museums, artist studios, architectural firms, You can learn about Ottawa’s rich and science labs are yours to explore free of charge. architectural and cultural heritage while getting behind-the-scenes access to some of the city’s most treasured landmarks. I am particularly excited about some new additions to this Shuttle Stops year’s list of participants: the beautifully renovated Bank of Canada building, the Canada Council Art Bank which houses 1. Sussex between Bruyère l St. Peter’s Lutheran Church 7. Laurier Ave. W. before beautiful works of art by Canada’s most talented artists, & St. Andrew l St. Andrew’s Presbyterian Church pedestrian crosswalk l in front of City Hall and the Parliament of Canada: East Block building. l Global Centre for Pluralism N Library and Archives Canada l The Delegation of the Ismaili Imamat l Parliament of Canada: East Block N l Embassy of Hungary N Of course, there are annual favourites such as the l Billings Estate Artefact Collection l Sir John A. Macdonald Building l Heritage Building, Ottawa City Hall Diefenbunker, Canada’s Cold War Museum, and Storage l Wellington Building l Ottawa Sport Hall of Fame Firefighters’ Day which coincides with Doors Open Ottawa l Lester B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rideau Valley Conservation Authority Technical Memorandum
    Rideau Valley Conservation Authority 3889 Rideau Valley Drive, PO Box 599, Manotick, Ontario, Canada | 613-692-3571 | www.rvca.ca Technical Memorandum October 14, 2014 Subject: Ottawa River Flood Risk Mapping from Shirley’s Bay to Cumberland Lead Investigator1: Ferdous Ahmed, Ph.D., P.Eng. Senior Water Resources Engineer Contributing staff: Daley Mikalson, Engineering Assistant Perry Ghioureliotis, GIS Specialist Evelyn Liu, Water Resources Engineer Andrea Larsen, Resource Technician Executive Summary This report provides a summary of the analytical methods used and underlying assumptions applied in the preparation of flood plain mapping for the Ottawa River from Shirley’s Bay to Cumberland. The project has been done in accordance with the technical guidelines set out under the Canada-Ontario Flood Damage Reduction Program (FDRP) (MNR, 1986), and the technical guide for the flood hazard delineation in Ontario (MNR, 2002) as laid out by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. The 1:100 year flood lines delineated here are suitable for use in the RVCA’s regulation limits mapping (referred to in Section 12 of Ontario Regulation 174/06) and in municipal land use planning and development approval processes under the Planning Act. 1 We gratefully acknowledge the guidance provided by Bruce Reid. Ottawa2014Mapping.doc 10/14/2014 2:17:03 PM Page 1 of 40 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Lebreton Flats Plan I
    lP 2¿tÔ -t0 1 The LeBreton Flats Plan I it I 1,* incorporating Official PIan Amendments rli¡ rû Nat¡onalCap¡lal Commission 1997 +ûrtir Commiss¡on de la capilale nat¡onale January I r t:I I¡. t. li l.l li I t, f i. [, tt: t L t_ L The LeBreton Flats Plan incorporatitg Official Plan Amendments prepared by the National Capital Commission January 1997 l Table of Contents Section PaSe Introduction 1 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1 History of LeBreton Flats 2 2.O LOCATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS zJl, Site Location 4 2.2 Land Ownership 4 2.3 Existing Land Uses 4 2.4 Adjacent Community Character 8 2.5 Heritage 9 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 Geology and Topography 10 3.2 Surface Water and Groundwater 10 3.3 Soil and Groundwater Contamination '1.2 3.4 Vegetation Inventory 1,6 3.5 Wildlife Inventory 18 3.6 Aquatic Inventory 19 4.0 PLANNING CONTEXT Ajl, Federal Land Use Plan 2L 4.2 Regional Official Plan 22 4.3 City of Ottawa Official Plan 23 4.4 City of Ottawa Zoning Bylaw 24 4.4.1, Zoning By-law 72-K 24 4.4.2 Zoning By-law 2020 25 5.0 SERVICING 5.1 Fleet Street Pumping Station and Aqueducts 26 5.2 Combined Sewers and Storm Sewer Network 26 5.3 Trunk Services 26 i 5.4 Utilities 27 5.5 Transportation 27 5.5.1 Roads 27 -ll- 5.5.2 Bridges 28 5.5.3 Transitway 29 5.5.4 Recreational Pathways 6.0 LEBRETON FLATS CONCEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • Reimagining Lemieux Island
    REIMAGINING LEMIEUX ISLAND by Ruamporn Ridthiprasart A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Post Doctoral Affairs in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture Carleton University Ottawa, Canada © 2020, Ruamporn Ridthiprasart i ABSTRACT This thesis explores the preservation and adaptive re-use of Ottawa’s Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant, incorporating new programs – biological water purification, aquaponics, water-based recreation, and education. Recently, rising water levels in the Ottawa River have led to flooding and threatened the operations at this plant. Extreme weather conditions, along with the public’s accessibility to new options in water treatment in the future, may mean that the original function of the plant will become obsolete, offering opportunities for the facilities to be repurposed. Based on current scientific information about increasing precipitation and ongoing climate instability, as well as on the existing flood patterns of the Ottawa River, the thesis design incorporates changes to the island’s topography in order to protect the historical buildings that are at lower elevations from flooding. Simultaneously, I propose a utilization of the industrial settling and filtering buildings with large water-holding capacities at higher elevations to test and study methods of bioremediation of water from the Ottawa River. This reimagined filtration plant will supply various other programs within the adapted historical building that include recreation, agriculture, and education. The main water bioremediation method used is Dr. John Todd’s “Living Machine” system, that mimics the cleansing function of natural wetlands. The recreational element of the project includes natural swimming pools with separate water cleansing components.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Travel for the Flâneur
    EFFICIENT TRAVEL FOR THE FLÂNEUR INTERMODAL STATION AND CENTRAL LIBRARY FOR OTTAWA by Boris Ivanov Kourtev A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Affairs in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Architecture Carleton University Ottawa, Ontario ©2016 Boris Ivanov Kourtev ABSTRACT The proposed expansion and long-awaited light rail connection to the Ottawa Macdonald–Cartier International Airport offers the opportunity to create a practical and symbolic transportation node within Canada’s capital city. Overlooking the majestic Ottawa River, Bayview Station occupies an almost barren site, detached from its context and making a subpar connection between the east-west bus and north-south O-Train routes. A proposed Intermodal Station at Bayview will not only unify these lines, but promises to organize a multifaceted social and cultural landscape for persons arriving to the City from afar and for commuting residents, alike. At the shoreline of the Ottawa River, immediately flanking the Central Business District, the axial termination of the Prince of Wales Bridge -- Bayview Station -- becomes a fundamental mediator between Ottawa and Gatineau. The programmatic pairing of Intermodal Station and Central Ottawa Library intertwines the paths associated with, respectively, efficient travel and wandering, opening a space to reflect on the dual nature of urban movement. Figure 01 - Node connecting West, East, North and South ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I hereby give warm thanks to the following people for their continuous support, guidance, and encouragement in both academic and personal level. My mom Iordanka Guenova, father Ivan Kourtev, and sister Lubomira Kourteva. My advisor Janine Debanne, professor Greg Andonian, and director Jill Stoner for their creative ideas, always pushing this thesis to reach higher potential.
    [Show full text]
  • A SONIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY of the CHANGING RIVERSCAPE from the CHAUDIÈRE FALLS to KETTLE and DUCK ISLANDS, 1880 to 1980
    SONGS OF THE OTTAWA: A SONIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL HISTORY OF THE CHANGING RIVERSCAPE FROM THE CHAUDIÈRE FALLS TO KETTLE AND DUCK ISLANDS, 1880 to 1980 by CRISTINA MARIE WOOD A research essay submitted to Carleton University in fulfillment of the requirements for the course HIST 5908, as credit toward the degree of Master of Arts in History – Public History with Specialization in Digital Humanities Department of History Carleton University Ottawa, Canada May 14, 2019 © Copyright, 2019, Cristina Wood ii Abstract “Songs of the Ottawa” is an experiment in the digital data sonification of the Ottawa River’s pasts. This study examines a stretch of river extending from below the Chaudière, Akikodjiwan, or Kana:tso Falls, past the points of confluence with three important waterways – the man-made locks at the Rideau Canal, the tumbling Rideau River falls and the low-lying delta of the Gatineau – to the sandy Kettle and Duck Islands. “Sonifying” the history of the river means to express history to achieve a particular sensual engagement with the past. Sonification is the “visualization” of historical data auditorially, to achieve a particular sensory affect. This project asks readers and listeners to hear uncanny, affective pasts and consider the ways in which storytellers can “de- form” and “re-form” data and sources. The three “songs of the Ottawa” offer a way into the stories of the river’s flows, of commerce and industry extending up and downstream, and of recreation on the water and shores. iii Acknowledgements This project has been generously supported by Carleton University and the Ontario Graduate Scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant Intake Improvements Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study
    1 Report to Rapport au: Environment Committee Comité de l’environnement 17 May 2016 / 17 mai 2016 and Council et au Conseil 25 May 2016 / 25 mai 2016 Submitted on May 10, 2016 Soumis le 10 mai 2016 Submitted by Soumis par: Susan Jones, Acting Deputy City Manager / Directrice municipal adjointe par intérim, City Operations / Opérations municipales Contact Person Personne ressource: Dixon Weir, General Manager / Directeur général, Environmental Services / Services environnementaux 613-580-2424, x22002 [email protected] Ward: KITCHISSIPPI (15) File Number: ACS2016-COS-ESD-0010 SUBJECT: Lemieux Island Water Purification Plant Intake Improvements Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Study OBJET: Étude d’évaluation environnementale municipale de portée générale portant sur l’amélioration des prises d’eau de l’usine de purification de l’eau de l’île Lemieux 2 REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS That the Environment Committee recommend Council to: 1. Approve the selection of the Deep Water Intake Beyond Ice Cover, as detailed in Document 1 and as described in this report, as the preferred alternative for the Lemieux Island Intake Improvements Project. 2. Direct staff to proceed with the filing of the Notice of Completion for a 30- day public review period in accordance with the Ontario Municipal Class Environmental Assessment Schedule "B" process. RECOMMANDATIONS DU RAPPORT Que le Comité de l’environnement recommande au Conseil d’approuver : 1. Approuver la solution privilégiée de la prise d’eau en eaux profondes au- delà de la couverture de glace, décrite dans le document 1, pour le projet d’amélioration des prises d’eau de l’usine de l’île Lemieux; 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Ottawa NEWSLETTER
    Heritage Ottawa NEWSLETTER Dedicated to Preserving Our Built Heritage Summer 2004 Volume 31, No. 2 Relic of Ottawa’s Railway History Lost By David Jeanes, President, Transport 2000 and Board Member, Heritage Ottawa ttawa’s first railway arrived 150 years ago O but its last relic in the original city was demolished on May 4. At the end of 1854 the Bytown and Prescott Railway came through Gloucester to New Edinburgh and crossed the Rideau River on a 441-foot wooden truss bridge. At the Ottawa bridge abutment a stone arch carried the railway over a riverbank path. The first station was between Dalhousie and Sussex. The “Black Bridge”, (so called to distinguish it from Photo: Ontario Archives I-0005775, 1970, detail. the “White Bridge” near Carleton University), was rebuilt in 1866 and 1923, eventually in steel with King Edward Avenue, stone arched pathway (arrow), and concrete around the piers. previously demolished rail bridge (left), Minto Bridge (right). In 1964 the Gréber plan removed the railway nearly 150 years that arch has been demolished by line for the Vanier Parkway and the Macdonald- the National Capital Commission after complaints Cartier bridge approaches. The bridge steel was that it was being used by the homeless. removed but not the piers in the river nor the The bridge piers still stand in the river but the abutment with its original stone arch. Now after arch had given pleasure over the years to local residents, including Councillor Georges Bédard who remembers it from his childhood. The NCC saved the stones but did not record the bridge appearance before hasty demolition by a mechanical excavator, which probably damaged them.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Champlain Park Community History by Daniel Buckles and Debra Huron Natural
    Champlain Park Community History by Daniel Buckles and Debra Huron Natural History Flooded by the Champlain Sea after the retreat of glaciers of the last Ice Age, the Ottawa River valley has a varied geology (Hogarth, 1962; Champman and Putnam, 1984). The shoreline at what is now Remic Rapids in Ottawa and Deschênes Rapids in Gatineau is a limestone plain with very thin soil known as an alvar (Huggett, 1993; 1995). Innis Point near Shirley’s Bay is also a shoreline alvar. This is a rare ecosystem in Ontario and Quebec with plant associations adapted to extremes of wet and dry. Two major alvar plant associations are Red Cedar-Prickly Ash and Bur Oak-Prickly Ash (Laird, 1995; Catling et. al., 2012). Bur Oak (Quercus macrocarpa) is a species of oak native to the deciduous forest Zone of eastern and midwestern North America. Ottawa is on the northern edge of the bur oak species range. Also known as Burr Oak and the Mossycup White Oak, the tree commonly lives 250 years, and may survive up to 400 years. It is drought- tolerant and fire-resistant because of its thick bark, a feature that accounts for its presence in open-forest savannas. Once established, the Bur Oak tolerates urban pollution (Laird, 1995) and grows faster than most other oak species. “The Champlain Oaks” (Map 1) are a community of healthy, pre-settlement Bur Oaks descended directly from the open forest of the shoreline alvar between Chaudière Falls and Deschênes Rapids. Oaks of this age (50-180 years) in an urban environment are very rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Package
    Date: February 11, 2021 Time: 1 pm Location: Zoom (see email invitation for instructions) Welcome and Introductions 1.0 a. Agenda Review Pg. Chair Graham b. Notice of Proxies c. Adoption of the Agenda (D) d. Declarations of Interest e. Approval of Minutes –October 27, 2020 (D) ► draft minutes attached as a separate document f. Correspondence – none Staff Reports, Updates and Presentation 2.0 Section 34 Amendments—staff report attached (D)………………………………… 1-2 Marika Livingston 3.0 Section 36 Workplan Update—staff report attached (I)……………………………. 3-4 Marika Livingston 4.0 Hydrocarbon Pipeline Threat Policy—staff report attached (D)………………….. 5-8 Marika Livingston 5.0 RMO Annual Reports—staff report attached (I)……………………………………… 9-14 Brian Stratton Other 6.0 Other Business Chair Graham 7.0 Member Inquiries Chair Graham 8.0 Next Meeting – April 8, 2021 Chair Graham 9.0 Adjournment Chair Graham (I) = Information (D) = Decision Delegations: If you wish to speak to an item on the Agenda please contact Marika Livingston before the meeting ([email protected] or 1-800-267-3504 x 1148) If you are a member of the public and would like to join the Zoom meeting please contact the above for remote meeting details. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Box 599, 3889 Rideau Valley Drive Telephone 613-692-3571 Fax 613-692-0831 Manotick, ON K4M 1A5 Toll-free 1-800-267-3504 www.mrsourcewater.ca 2.0 Section 34 Amendments Date: February 11, 2021 To: Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Committee From: Marika Livingston, Project Manager Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Region _____________________________________________________________________ Recommendation: That the Mississippi-Rideau Source Protection Committee receive this update about the upcoming amendments.
    [Show full text]