DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Artful: Government and Industry Roles in Britain's Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Artful: Government and Industry Roles in Britain's Future The Royal United Services Institute he launch of HMS Astute and the renewal of Britain’s strategic nuclear deterrent have Tfocused attention on the UK Submarine Industrial Base. Consistent with the Defence Industrial Strategy, the industrial base is in the process of re-structuring to provide an affordable, sustainable defence capability. This Whitehall Report seeks to explore some of the challenges facing the organizations responsible for the design, build, support and disposal of Britain’s nuclear powered submarines, the most complex weapons platform in the UK armed forces. This report begins with an analysis of the role and importance of Whitehall Report 3-07 submarines in UK defence policy. Subsequently, the report analyzes Ministry of Defence and industry from a comprehensive and forward-looking perspective, taking into account the operational requirements for future submarine classes, industrial structure, Artful developments in contracting strategy and questions of emerging technology. Beyond : Government and Industry Roles in Britain’s Future Submarine Design, Build and Support Gavin Ireland The Royal United Services Institute Whitehall Report 3-07 Beyond Artful: Government and Industry Roles in Britain’s Future Submarine Design, Build and Support Gavin Ireland SPONSORED BY: www.rusi.org First Published 2007 © The Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or other- wise, without prior permission of the Royal United Services Institute. Whitehall Report Series ISSN 1750-9432 Series Editor: Dr Terence McNamee Assistant Editor: Victoria Shin Most Whitehall Reports are available as part of a membership package, or individually at £10.00 plus p&p (£1.00 in the UK/£2.00 overseas). Orders should be sent to the Membership Administrator, RUSI Membership Office, South Park Road, Macclesfield, SK11 6SH, United Kingdom and cheques made payable to RUSI. Orders can also be made via the website or by quoting credit card details via email to: [email protected] For more details, visit our website: www.rusi.org Front cover image: The Royal Navy nuclear-powered attack submarine (SSN) HMS Turbulent at sea. © Crown copyright/Ministry of Defence, image from www.photos.mod.uk. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Back cover image: The Royal Navy SSN HMS Trafalgar sailing from Devonport. Photo by DML LW. Printed in Great Britain by Stephen Austin & Sons Ltd. for the Royal United Services Institute, Whitehall, London, SW1A 2ET, UK RUSI is a Registered Charity (No. 210639) The views expressed in this report are those of the author alone and do not represent the views of RUSI or any institution to which the author is associated. Comments pertaining to this report are invited and should be forwarded to Dr Lee Willett, Royal United Services Institute, Whitehall, London, SW1A 2ET, United Kingdom, or via email to [email protected] iii List of Acronyms ASMIPT Attack Submarines Integrated Project Team ASuW Anti-Surface Warfare ASW Anti-Submarine Warfare ATTAC Availability Transformation, Tornado Aircraft Contract BAES BAE Systems BNS Babcock Naval Services CFA Contracting for Availability COTS Commercial-Off-The-Shelf CVF Carrier Vehicular Future (Future Aircraft Carrier) DACP Defence Acquisition Change Programme DE&S Defence Equipment and Support DEC(UWE) Director Equipment Capability (Underwater Effects) DG Nuclear Director General Nuclear DG Sub Director General Submarine DIS Defence Industrial Strategy DLO Defence Logistics Organization DLoD Defence Line of Development DML Devonport Management Limited DPA Defence Procurement Agency DTI Department of Trade and Industry DTS Defence Technology Strategy EB Electric Boat EIPT Equipment Integrated Project Team FRPS Flotilla Reactor Plant Support Contract GIUK Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom HCDC House of Commons Defence Committee HVAC&R Heating, Ventilation, Air Conditioning and Refrigeration IAW Indicators and Warning IPT Integrated Project Team ISR Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance JV Joint Venture KSF Key Supplier Forum LTCA Long Term Collaboration Agreement MARS Maritime Afloat Reach and Sustainability MIS Maritime Industrial Strategy MoD Ministry of Defence NSRP Nuclear Steam-Raising Plant PFG Pricing and Forecasting Group PPP Public-Private Partnership R&T Research and Technology RAMP Revalidation and Assisted Maintenance Period RC Reactor Compartment iv RCS Replacement Combat System SAM Submarine Acquisition Modernization SDR Strategic Defence Review SF Special Forces SIB Submarine Industrial Base SLoC Sea Line of Communication SME Small/Medium Enterprise SPO Submarine Programme Offer SSBN Ship Submersible Ballistic Nuclear SSBN-F Ship Submersible Ballistic Nuclear – Future SSK Ship Submersible Conventional SSMG Submarine Support Management Group SSN Ship Submersible Nuclear SUBIPT Submarine Support Integrated Project Team TLAM Tomahawk Land Attack Missile TLCM Through-life Capability Management TSS-D Transforming Submarine Support - Design UK United Kingdom US United States WHLS Weapons Handling and Launch System v Acknowledgements This Whitehall Report was written while the author was a full-time staff member, on secondment for seven months from October 2006 until May 2007, in the Military Sciences Department at the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security Studies. The author would like to thank Lee Willett (Head, Maritime Studies Programme) and Michael Codner (Director, Military Sciences) at RUSI, and Martin Pulford and Tim Chittenden at BAE Systems for making this Whitehall Report pos- sible. The author also thanks Sandy Morris at ABN Amro, the UK Ministry of Defence, those across the submarine defence industrial base, and those from Government departments, whose profes- sional and personal opinions contributed to this study. Author Gavin Ireland was, for a seven-month secondment during which this report was written, a Researcher in the Military Sciences Department, RUSI. He was seconded to RUSI from BAE Systems Submarine Solutions, where he is on the graduate development scheme. During his time at RUSI, he also co-authored RUSI’s Whitehall Report, ‘The United Kingdom’s Independent Strategic Nuclear Deterrent’, and contributed articles to RUSI Defence Systems and the RUSI Newsbrief. He holds an MA (Hons) in International Relations from the University of St Andrews and an MA in Defence and Security Analysis from the Centre for Defence and International Security Studies at Lancaster University where he wrote his postgraduate dissertation on the role of the nuclear scientific com- plex in shaping emerging US nuclear weapons policy. His particular areas of interest are in the main- tenance of the UK defence industrial base, the role of technology in shaping operations and the transfer of technology and working practices between defence and the motorsport industry. Beyond Artful: Government and Industry Roles in Britain’s Future Submarine Design, Build and Support Introduction On 8 June 2007, the nuclear powered attack pure strategy and more a sort of country submarine (SSN) HMS Astute was rolled out dance in which tricky political and industrial for launch. HMS Astute was the first British steps must be made at precisely the right submarine to go in the water since 1998, intervals.4 when HMS Vengeance, the Vanguard class The decision to proceed with a succes- deterrent submarine was launched, and the sor to the Vanguard class was also important first SSN since the Trafalgar class boat HMS for the Royal Navy’s continued operation of Triumph was launched in 1991. HMS Astute’s nuclear powered attack submarines (SSNs) as launch, and the recent debate on the renewal the build programmes for SSNs and SSBNs of Britain’s strategic nuclear deterrent, has are mutually interdependent. Had the deci- focused public and political attention on the sion been taken to renounce a submarine- future of the UK Submarine Industrial Base based nuclear deterrent, the maintenance of (SIB). In terms of the UK’s strategic deter- a nuclear submarine capability in the UK rent, the Government policy – supported by would most likely have become unviable5 as Parliament following a vote on 14 March an absence of future orders could have jeop- 2007 – approved concept work for the succes- ardized the submarine build and support sor to the current fleet of Vanguard class infrastructure. Whilst a fourth Astute class nuclear powered ballistic missile submarines submarine could have been produced, the (SSBNs).1 Often to the exclusion of wider likely departure of key skilled workers from policy debate, industrial issues formed a cen- the doomed enterprise may have ensured tral point around which the discussion that the third Astute class boat, HMS Artful, revolved, with focus ranging from the pro- would be the last nuclear powered subma- posed seventeen year timescale for the pro- rine to be built in the UK. duction of a new SSBN (hereafter referred to But of course the SSN does not exist as SSBN-F2), to the technical and regulatory solely to sustain industrial capacity. As this challenges inherent in supporting the report discusses, the role of the SSN in Vanguard class beyond a thirty year service Britain’s execution of defence and security life.3 As one commentator observed, ‘the policy is uniquely important, but often future of Trident
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submarine Delivery Agency Corporate Plan 2019 to 2022
    Submarine Delivery Agency Corporate Plan 2019-2022 November 2019 1 Contents Section Chapter Page 1 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence 3 2 Introduction by the SDA Chair and Chief Executive 4 3 Our Background 5 4 Our Vision and Purpose 6 5 Our Strategic Objectives 7 6 How We Are Governed 9 7 How We Deliver 11 8 What We Deliver 14 9 Looking Out to 2022 17 Annex A – Submarine Delivery Agency Key Performance Indicators 19 2 1. Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence I am delighted to introduce the 2019 - 2022 Corporate Plan for the Submarine Delivery Agency (SDA), which sets out the intent for delivery of this essential part of Defence. The Continuous at Sea Deterrent (CASD) is the cornerstone of our national security, reaffirmed by Parliament in 2016, and its delivery demands a strong and clear focus. Our Defence Purpose is to protect the people of the UK, prevent conflict, and be ready to fight the UK’s enemies. Our submarine capability ensures we are prepared for the present. It also guarantees we are fit for the future and provides the ultimate guarantee of our safety for the next 50 years and beyond. In its first year of operation, the SDA has made great strides to sustain the readiness and availability of our current and future key defence capabilities. I have seen the real progress being made on the ground in delivering our submarines in build and ensuring that our in-service fleet is able to fulfil its missions. We have seen commitments of around £2.5Bn to support the second phase of the Dreadnought programme so far.
    [Show full text]
  • Trouble Ahead: Risks and Rising Costs in the UK Nuclear Weapons
    TROUBLE AHEAD RISKS AND RISING COSTS IN THE UK NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAMME TROUBLE AHEAD RISKS AND RISING COSTS IN THE UK NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROGRAMME David Cullen Nuclear Information Service April 2019 1 A note on terminology The National Audit Ofce (NAO) uses the term The terms ‘project’ and ‘programme’ are both used ‘Defence Nuclear Enterprise’. This refers to all of within government in diferent contexts to describe the elements in the programme but also includes the same thing. Although referred to as ‘projects’ elements which are technically and bureaucratically in the annual data produced by the government’s intertwined with it as part of the Astute submarine Infrastructure and Projects Authority (IPA), the programme. The term has also been adopted by the large MOD projects discussed in this report refer to MOD in recent publications. This report will also themselves as ‘programmes’ in their titles, and contain employ the term with the same meaning, usually within them major streams of work which are no doubt preferring the shorter ‘the Enterprise’. managed as separate projects in their own right. This report also uses the NATO shorthand ‘SSBN’ to As a general rule, this report aims to use the terms refer to submarines which are nuclear powered and project and programme to mean diferent things – a nuclear-armed and ‘SSN’ to refer to submarines which project being a relatively streamlined body of work are nuclear powered but not nuclear-armed. with a single purpose, and a programme being a larger-scale endeavour potentially encompassing A full glossary of terms and acronyms can be found at several bodies of work which may themselves be the end of the report on page 53.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation Into Equipment Cannibalisation in the Royal Navy
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ministry of Defence Investigation into equipment cannibalisation in the Royal Navy HC 525 SESSION 2017–2019 1 NOVEMBER 2017 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. Our studies evaluate the value for money of public spending, nationally and locally. Our recommendations and reports on good practice help government improve public services, and our work led to audited savings of £734 million in 2016. Ministry of Defence Investigation into equipment cannibalisation in the Royal Navy Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 30 October 2017 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 26 October 2017 HC 525 | £10.00 Cannibalisation involves removing a working part from one piece of equipment, such as a ship or submarine, to put it into another that is in greater operational need.
    [Show full text]
  • BAE Systems Submarines Prospectus
    Submarines Early Careers 2020 Prospectus 2 Submarines Academy for Skills and Knowledge - Prospectus Submarines Academy for Skills and Knowledge - Prospectus 3 Contents 1 Managing Director’s Welcome 2 Principal’s Welcome 4 Five decades of nuclear-powered submarine building 7 Submarines sites in the UK 8 Submarines Academy for Skills and Knowledge 9 Diversity and Inclusion 10 Celebrating success 11 Community Outreach 12 Careers advice and guidance 14 Intermediate and Advanced Apprenticeships 18 Higher/Degree Apprenticeships 22 Graduate Accelerate Programme 26 Gaining experience of the workplace 4 Submarines Academy for Skills and Knowledge - Prospectus Submarines Academy for Skills and Knowledge - Prospectus 1 Managing Director’s welcome In BAE Systems Submarines we take pride in delivering an essential edge to the Royal Navy, supporting them to protect what matters most. We are proud of our reputation for designing, building, testing, and commissioning world class submarines, and every one of our employees is here to make a vital contribution. Today’s nuclear-powered submarines are among the most complex engineering products in the world, and require a vast range of skills to deliver successfully, offering exciting opportunities for anyone joining our business. The shipyard has a proud and distinguished history of shipbuilding, with 140 years’ experience in supplying ships to the Royal Navy. We built our first submarine in 1886 and our first submarine for the Royal Navy in 1901. As an ambitious, determined and hard-working Apprentice, Higher Apprentice or Graduate, you could be part of our continuing success story. Today we continue to deliver world class submarines for the Royal Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Defence Nuclear Enterprise a Landscape Review
    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ministry of Defence The Defence Nuclear Enterprise: a landscape review HC 1003 SESSION 2017–2019 22 MAY 2018 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund, nationally and locally, have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. The C&AG does this through a range of outputs including value-for-money reports on matters of public interest; investigations to establish the underlying facts in circumstances where concerns have been raised by others or observed through our wider work; landscape reviews to aid transparency; and good-practice guides. Our work ensures that those responsible for the use of public money are held to account and helps government to improve public services, leading to audited savings of £734 million in 2016. Ministry of Defence The Defence Nuclear Enterprise: a landscape review Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 21 May 2018 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 18 May 2018 HC 1003 | £10.00 This landscape report was prepared to help Parliament better understand one of government’s most complex and costly programmes.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy. Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23
    Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23 October 2008 NIKLAS GRANHOLM (ED.) MICHAEL Codner, ROBert DALSJÖ, NORMAN FRIEDMAN, ERIC GROVE, KARL SÖRENSON, LEE WILLett FOI, Swedish Defence Research Agency, is a mainly assignment-funded agency under the Ministry of Defence. The core activities are research, method and technology development, as well as studies conducted in the interests of Swedish defence and the safety and security of society. The organisation employs approximately 1000 personnel of whom about 800 are scientists. This makes FOI Sweden’s largest research institute. FOI gives its customers access to leading-edge expertise in a large number of fields such as security policy studies, defence and security related analyses, the assessment of various types of threat, systems for control and management of crises, protection against and management of hazardous substances, IT security and the potential offered by new sensors. FOI Swedish Defence Research Agency Phone: +46 8 55 50 30 00 www.foi.se FOI-R--2655--SE Base data report Defence Analysis Defence Analysis Fax: +46 8 55 50 31 00 ISSN 1650-1942 December 2008 SE-164 90 Stockholm Michael Codner, Robert Dalsjö, Norman Friedman, Eric Grove, Karl Sörenson and Lee Willett Niklas Granholm (Ed.) Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy Karlskrona and Stockholm, 21-23 October 2008 FOI-R--2655--SE Titel Sex perspektiv på marin strategi. Karlskrona och Stock- holm, 21-23 oktober 2008 Title Six Perspectives on Naval Strategy. Karlskrona & Stock- holm, 21-23 October 2008 Rapportnr/Report no FOI-R--2655--SE Rapporttyp Underlagsrapport Report Type Base data report Månad/Month December/December Utgivningsår/Year 2008 Antal sidor/Pages 92 p ISSN ISSN 1650-1942 Kund/Customer Försvarsmakten Forskningsområde 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of the UK's Strategic Nuclear Deterrent
    House of Commons Defence Committee The Future of the UK’s Strategic Nuclear Deterrent: the Manufacturing and Skills Base Fourth Report of Session 2006–07 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 12 December 2006 HC 59 [Incorporating HC 1705-i, Session 2005–06] Published on 19 December 2006 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Defence Committee The Defence Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Ministry of Defence and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon James Arbuthnot MP (Conservative, North East Hampshire) (Chairman) Mr David S Borrow MP (Labour, South Ribble) Mr David Crausby MP (Labour, Bolton North East) Linda Gilroy MP (Labour, Plymouth Sutton) Mr David Hamilton MP (Labour, Midlothian) Mr Mike Hancock MP (Liberal Democrat, Portsmouth South) Mr Dai Havard MP (Labour, Merthyr Tydfil and Rhymney) Mr Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Mr Bernard Jenkin MP (Conservative, North Essex) Mr Brian Jenkins MP (Labour, Tamworth) Mr Kevan Jones MP (Labour, Durham North) Robert Key MP (Conservative, Salisbury) Willie Rennie MP (Liberal Democrat, Dunfermline and West Fife) John Smith MP (Labour, Vale of Glamorgan) The following Members were also Members of the Committee during the Parliament. Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Derek Conway MP (Conservative, Old Bexley and Sidcup) Mr Mark Lancaster MP (Conservative, North East Milton Keynes) Mr Desmond Swayne MP (Conservative, New Forest West) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • Mariner's Mirror
    THE MARINER ’S MIRROR THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR NAUTICAL RESEARCH BIBLIOGRAPHY FOR 2007 Compiled by M.S. Partridge PhD, FRHistSoc K. Partridge, BA LONDON 2009 2009 The Society for Nautical Research 2 INTRODUCTION This, the twenty-fifth annual maritime bibliography, includes books and articles published in 2007, as well as some works published in earlier years. The subjects included are as follows: naval history, mercantile history, nautical archaeology (but not the more technical works), biography, voyages and travel, and art and weapons and artefacts. A list of acquisitions of manuscripts precedes the published works cited, and we are, as always, grateful to The National Archives: Historical Manuscripts Commission (TNA: HMC) for providing this. With regard to books, International Standard Book Numbers (ISBNs) have been included, when available. The bibliography for 2007 was prepared and edited by: Karen Partridge Michael Partridge, PhD, FRHistSoc It is particularly requested that all correspondence relating to the bibliography for 2008 should be sent to: Dr. M.S. Partridge School of Theology, Philosophy, and History St Mary ’s University College, Twickenham Waldegrave Road Twickenham TW1 4SX email: [email protected] The compilers would like to thank everyone who contributed to the present bibliography, and always welcome the assistance of readers. We should also like to acknowledge our use of the material listed in the Tijdschrift voor Zeegeschiedenis. 3 ARCHIVES The National Archives in its annual Accessions to Repositories exercise collects information from over 200 record repositories throughout the British Isles about manuscript accessions received in the previous twelve months. The information is then edited and used to produce a number of thematic digests which are distributed for publication in a number of learned journals and news- letters, as well as being made available in full on TNA ’s website (www.nationalarchives.gov.uk.).
    [Show full text]
  • Astute Class of Submarines
    BARROW BUILT THE ASTUTE CLASS ATTACK SUBMARINES HMS Astute arrives at Faslane Vickers along with other great armament manufacturers in both the shipbuilding and aircraft industries have finally gone but the tradition of building and designing Royal Navy submarines still continues at Barrow In Furness. The old Vickers yard is now being run by BAE Systems. The Astute Class of submarines is the planned replacement for the Swiftsure and Trafalgar Class SSNs (Sub-Surface Nuclear), and was to start entering service from the middle of this decade. Intended as a relatively low risk low cost approach to providing a next generation nuclear submarine for the Royal Navy, the Astute programme has unfortunately become one of the most troubled UK defence projects since the 1980's, matched only by the Nimrod 2000 programme. Due to serious delays and problems encountered by the prime contractor BAE Systems, the first unit, HMS Astute, is now not expected to be delivered until November 2008 and will become fully operational in 2009 - four years later than forecast when ordered. Up to seven Astute's will be procured by about 2022, and it is possible that a modified variant may also eventually replace the Vanguard class SSBN's. Unlike every previous class of British nuclear submarine since HMS Dreadnought in the early 1960's, a very significant foreign (American) content has been accepted in the design work after the failure of BAE Systems to complete the task in-house. Nuclear powered hunter-killer submarines are at the heart of the Royal Navy force structure. They have a wide variety of roles and, although conceived towards the end of the cold war, are proving extremely adaptable to a revised employment within the new world order.
    [Show full text]
  • Npao News Clippings Dtd 26 July 2021
    Today’s News 26 July 2021 (Monday) A. NAVY NEWS/COVID NEWS/PHOTOS Title Writer Newspaper Page NIL NIL NIL NIL B. NATIONAL HEADLINES Title Writer Newspaper Page 1 ‘Bold moves needed vs Delta’ L Desiderio P Star 1 2 Duterte’s final Sona: A legacy of change’ J Aning PDI A1 C. NATIONAL SECURITY Title Writer Newspaper Page Foreign policy under Duterte: ‘The Chinese D Manhit P Star 4 3 Dream’ and the Dire consequences of an appeasement policy PDI A2 4 More malasakit centers, ‘SIN ‘tax hike among fulfilled SONA goals D. INDO-PACIFIC Title Writer Newspaper Page NIL NIL NIL NIL E. AFP RELATED Title Writer Newspaper Page Southern Tagalog Army unit a has a new E Amoroso P Star 13 5 commander F. CPP-NPA-NDF-LCM Title Writer Newspaper Page G. MNLF/MILF/BIFF/ASG Title Writer Newspaper Page 6 16 Abu Sayaf surrender R Pareño P Star 13 H. EDITORIAL-OPINION-COMMENTARY-SPECIAL Title Writer Newspaper Page 7 ‘Let the people be the judge’ Malaya B8 8 Outer space and the vice race C Aranda M Times A6 9 Crossing over A Cardona D Tribune A5 I. ONLINE NEWS Title Link NATIONAL NEWS Thousands of Filipinos forced to flee https://www.scmp.com/news/asia/southeast- 10 homes as monsoon rains lash the asia/article/3142464/thousands-flee-homes- Philippines monsoon-rains-lash-philippines Typhoon leads to loss of lives, https://businessmirror.com.ph/2021/07/26/typh 11 livelihoods oon-leads-to-loss-of-lives-livelihoods/ 12 Gov't all set for Duterte's final SONA https://www.pna.gov.ph/articles/1148226 Phone signals jammed, traffic and rallies https://manilastandard.net/news/top-
    [Show full text]
  • Fortress Scotland
    FORTRESS SCOTLAND FORTRESS SCOTLAND SCOTTISH CND Published by Scottish CND, 15 Barrland Street Glasgow, G41 1QH Tel: 0141 423 1222 [email protected] www.banthebomb.org September 2004 1 FORTRESS SCOTLAND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report would not exist without the work of several people. James N. started the project in the summer of 2003 before leaving to begin postgraduate studies. The bulk of the report has been produced by Paul C. who spent many long hours searching the World Wide Web to track down information whilst patiently putting up with the pedantry of other Scottish CND activists. Paul deserves the thanks of anybody who finds something of interest in this report as well as from everyone interested in promoting the cause of Peace in Scotland. Without his tremendous contribution, this report would not exist. Carol A. designed the front cover whilst Lucy A. helped put together the maps. Allison H. painstakingly proof-read the final draft and the report was printed with the help of staff and volunteers in Scottish CND’s office. 2 FORTRESS SCOTLAND FORWARD The stag at bay. Glens and bens. Castles and ceilidhs. The familiar shortbread-tin images of Scotland are clichéd but effective symbols for a country where tourism is a major earner. The bonnie, bonnie, banks of Loch Lomond are famed in song. But few who take the high road towards the “steep steep slopes of Ben Lomond”, realise that among the traffic hazards they may face en route are convoys carrying nuclear bombs, which regularly share the same road. Or that they are a few miles from the biggest arsenal of nuclear bombs in Europe – Coulport, a short hike away over the moors to Loch Long.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Appendix: Seventy Years of Gunboat Diplomacy
    Chronological Appendix: Seventy Years of Gunboat Diplomacy This Chronological Appendix is not a complete list of all the examples of the application of limited naval force during the last seventy years; that would need a separate book. The instances listed below have been chosen to show the different ways in which, year by year, many governments have employed this expedient in various parts of the world. Because it is meant to illustrate the range of gunboat diplomacy, and to avoid tedious repetition, the choice made does not reflect the actual distribution of gunboat diplomacy in parti­ cular years or geographical areas. The number of incidents in China during the late 1920s, for instance, was far larger than the selection included here. This chronology does not, therefore, present a historically or geographically representative cross-section of the actual employment of gunboat diplomacy during the last seventy years, and cannot be used as a basis for mathematical conjectures. The choice of examples has been guided by the definition reached in Chapter 1: gunboat diplomacy is the use or threat of limited naval force, otherwise than as an act of war, in order to secure advantage or to avert loss, either in the furtherance of an international dispute or else against foreign nationals within the territory or the jurisdiction of their own state. Naval action in time of war has been excluded, unless this took place against allies or neutrals, and actions resulting in war (whether declared or not) have only been quoted as examples of failure - and on the assumption that only limited force was originally intended.
    [Show full text]