Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Laboratory of Parasitology 2015 Hymenolepis folkertsi n. sp. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the Oldfield ouM se Peromyscus polionotus (Wagner) (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Neotominae) from the Southeastern Nearctic with Comments on Tapeworm Faunal Diversity among Deer Mice Arseny A. Makarikov Russian Academy of Sciences, [email protected] Todd N. Nims Georgia Perimeter College Kurt E. Galbreath Northern Michigan University Eric P. Hoberg United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons, Parasitology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Makarikov, Arseny A.; Nims, Todd N.; Galbreath, Kurt E.; and Hoberg, Eric P., "Hymenolepis folkertsi n. sp. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the Oldfield Mouse Peromyscus polionotus (Wagner) (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Neotominae) from the Southeastern Nearctic with Comments on Tapeworm Faunal Diversity among Deer Mice" (2015). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 795. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/795 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. This article is a U.S. government work and is not subject to copyright in the United States. Parasitol Res DOI 10.1007/s00436-015-4399-x ORIGINAL PAPER Hymenolepis folkertsi n. sp. (Eucestoda: Hymenolepididae) in the oldfield mouse Peromyscus polionotus (Wagner) (Rodentia: Cricetidae: Neotominae) from the southeastern Nearctic with comments on tapeworm faunal diversity among deer mice Arseny A. Makarikov & Todd N. Nims & Kurt E. Galbreath & Eric P. Hoberg Received: 18 December 2014 /Accepted: 27 February 2015 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015 Abstract A previously unrecognized species of host switching among other cricetid, murid, and geomyid ro- hymenolepidid cestode attributable to Hymenolepis is de- dents in sympatry. scribed based on specimens in Peromyscus polionotus, oldfield mouse, from Georgia near the southeastern coast of Keywords Eucestoda . Hymenolepididae . Hymenolepis continental North America. Specimens of Hymenolepis folkertsi . New species . Morphology . Rodents . Peromyscus folkertsi n. sp. differ from those attributed to most other spe- polionotus . Georgia cies in the genus by having testes arranged in a triangle and a scolex with a prominent rostrum-like protrusion. The newly recognized species is further distinguished by the relative po- sition and length of the cirrus sac, shape of seminal receptacle, and relative size of external seminal vesicle and seminal re- ceptacle. Hymenolepidid cestodes have sporadically been re- Introduction ported among the highly diverse assemblage of Peromyscus which includes 56 distinct species in the Nearctic. Although Muroid rodents of the genus Peromyscus Gloger, 1841 the host genus has a great temporal duration and is endemic to (Cricetidae) are among the most diverse assemblage among the Nearctic, current evidence suggests that tapeworm faunal the Neotominae and represent an endemic complex of 56 spe- diversity reflects relatively recent assembly through bouts of cies occurring with restricted and overlapping distributions across a considerable geographic expanse of North America from near Arctic latitudes into central Mexico (Musser and Carleton 2005). The taxonomy and biogeography of these A. A. Makarikov (*) Institute of Systematics and Ecology of Animals, Siberian Branch of rodents are particularly intricate reflecting both the temporal the Russian Academy of Sciences, Frunze Str. 11, duration of this group with origins in the late Miocene and Novosibirsk, Russia 630091 early Pliocene in the Nearctic and the range of habitats that are e-mail: [email protected] occupied by various species (e.g., Kurtén and Anderson 1980; T. N. Nims Avise et al. 1983;Dragooetal.2006). The extensive geo- Science Department, Georgia Perimeter College, 239 Cedar Lane, graphic range of this assemblage suggests the potential for Covington, GA 30014, USA substantial insights about the history and patterns of North American biogeography and ecology, which can be revealed K. E. Galbreath Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, 1401 Presque by exploring diversity and faunal assembly of complex host- Isle Ave., Marquette, MI 49855, USA parasite systems (e.g., Whitaker Jr 1968; Whitaker and Hamilton 1998;Hobergetal.2012; Makarikov et al. 2013a). E. P. Hoberg Biodiversity inventory for helminths has involved few spe- United States National Parasite Collection, Animal Parasitic Disease Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, BARC East No. cies within Peromyscus and has focused, for example, on the 1180, 10300 Baltimore Avenue, Beltsville, MD 20705, USA following: Peromyscus maniculatus (Wagner, 1845) Parasitol Res (Michigan and Wisconsin—Rausch and Tiner 1949; Pers. Comm.; http://arctos.database.museum/ Quebec—Schad 1954; central plains eastern Rocky SpecimenSearch.cfm). In contrast to the considerable Mountains—Smith 1954; Arizona—Kruidenier and diversity of these neotomine rodents, relatively few Gallicchio 1956; Alberta—Lubinsky 1957;Utah— comprehensive studies of host-parasite diversity have been Grundmann and Frandsen 1960; Colorado and Idaho— conducted and the helminth faunas for most species are Leiby 1961, 1962;Montana—Vaughn 2013), Pe. completely unknown or are based on fragmentary survey data maniculatus, Peromyscus eremicus (Baird, 1857), (e.g., species lists summarized in Erickson 1938;Doran1954; Peromyscus truei (Shufeldt, 1885) and Peromyscus crinitus Whitaker Jr 1968;Dyer1969). (Merriam, 1891) (Nevada—Babero and Matthias 1967), Pe. Although ectoparasites of Peromyscus have been reason- maniculatus and Peromyscus leucopus (Rafinesque, 1818) ably well characterized, there remains minimal information (Illinois—Barker et al. 1987), Peromyscus californicus about helminth diversity in these hosts (Whitaker Jr 1968). (Gambell, 1848), Pe. truei and Peromyscus boylii (Baird, Nematodes are prominent components of most communities 1855) (coastal California—Voge 1952), Pe. boylii and Pe. where data are available, but cestodes appear to be relatively maniculatus (central California—Tinkle 1972)and rare other than species of Catenotaenia Janicki, 1904 and Peromyscus gossypinus (LeConte, 1853), Peromyscus Choanotaenia Railliet, 1896 and may be most often associat- polionotus (Wagner, 1843), and Podomys floridanus ed with other rodent hosts in sympatry (e.g., Erickson 1938; (Chapman, 1889) (Florida—Layne 1963; Kinsella 1991). Smith 1954; Doran 1954; Grundmann and Frandsen 1960; Geographically extensive and often site intensive survey Leiby 1961, 1962;Dyer1969;Barkeretal.1987; Kinsella among species of Peromyscus were conducted by mammalo- 1991)(Table1). For example, hymenolepidids have sporadi- gists associated with the Museum of Southwestern Biology cally been documented among Peromyscus spp. including un- (University of New Mexico) and in the Beringian Coevolution armed cestodes referred to Hymenolepis citelli (McLeod, Project exploring diversity across high latitudes of the 1933) and Hymenolepis diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) in Pe. Nearctic. In excess of 800 potential hosts were examined in- maniculatus from Utah (Grundmann and Frandsen 1960) cluding Pe. maniculatus, Peromyscus keeni (Rhoads, 1894), and armed Rodentolepis nana (Siebold, 1852) (as and Peromyscus nasutus (Allen, 1891) with cestodes docu- Hymenolepis)inPe. gossypinus, Pe. polionotus,andPo. mented in about 6 % of these rodents (Mariel Campbell, floridanus from Florida (Kinsella 1991). Unidentified Table 1 Checklist of cestodes reported from Peromyscus spp Cestode species Host species Locality Reference Catenotaenia peromysci Smith, 1954 Pe. maniculatus New Mexico, Colorado, Smith (1954) Wyoming, Pe. maniculatus Colorado Leiby (1961) Pe. maniculatus Illinois Barker et al. (1987) Choanotaenia peromysci (Erickson, 1938) Pe. maniculatus Minnesota Erickson (1938) (syn.: Prochoanotaenia peromysci Erickson, 1938) Pe. maniculatus Illinois Barker et al. (1987) Hymenolepis sp. Pe. maniculatus, Pe. eremicus Nevada Babero and Matthias (1967) Pe. maniculatus Minnesota Erickson (1938) Pe. maniculatus Arizona Kruidenier and Gallicchio (1956) Pe. maniculatus Nebraska Hansen (1950) Pe. maniculatus Montana Vaughn (2013) Hymenolepis sp. (cysticercoids) Pe. maniculatus Idaho Leiby (1962) Hymenolepis bennetti Freeman, 1960 Pe. maniculatus Ontario Freeman (1960) Pe. maniculatus, Pe. leucopus Illinois Barker et al. (1987) H. citelli (McLeod, 1933) Pe. maniculatus Utah Grundmann and Frandsen (1960) H. diminuta (Rudolphi, 1819) Pe. maniculatus Utah Grundmann and Frandsen (1960) H. horrida (Linstow, 1901) Pe. truei, Pe. boylii, California Voge (1952) Pe. californicus H. peromysci Tinkle, 1972 Pe. boylii Pe. maniculatus California Tinkle (1972) Rodentolepis nana (Siebold, 1852) Pe. gossypinus, Pe. polionotus Florida Kinsella (1991) (syn.: Hymenolepis nana (Siebold, 1852)) Taenia rileyi Loewen, 1929 (larva) Pe. gossypinus Florida Kinsella