DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains 30 submissions with surnames A-H. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Fuller, Heather From: Sent: 29 September 2014 15:31 To: Reviews@ Subject: Bristol Ward Boundary revisions Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed To the Local Government Boundary Commission for England 3rd Floor, Layden House 76-86 Turnmill Street London EC1M 5LG Bristol Ward Boundaries I send this as an individual submission but wish to reinforce some of the ideas in the Bristol Labour Party submission from my own experience of living and standing for election in Bristol wards and Bristol West constituency. I wish however that we had adopted the voting system used in Scotland, single transferable vote, which would I believe give better more representative governance alongside the elected mayor. I also make suggestions if you decide to join up areas previously in the same ward now separated by lines on maps, either parliamentary constituencies or the M32 or other main roads. I refer only to the current Bristol West and adjacent areas. I have lived in since 1976 and during that time I have been in two wards, first Bishopston and then Redland which was created in the early 1980s. I previous lived in Lawrence Hill for a few months. Although I stood as a parliamentary candidate for Bristol West, I have attended parliamentary boundary inquiries as a champion of electoral reform believing as I do that parties should fight for every vote, be a vehicle for information and communication between the electorate and politics. So although I understand the party political imperative for creating safe seats and marginals I genuinely believe in taking notice of the ways communities work together, the way they orientate because of geographical reasons, schools, medical surgeries, faith meeting places. As a self taught psephologist, co-writing a book Making Votes Count, I have made a special study of my home constituency and ideally look forward to Bristol West becoming Bristol Central which reflects what I believe it really has become. Even in the old Bristol West before the addition of Lawrence Hill and Easton, the St Werburgh's Community Centre branded itself as working with the people of East Bristol. This inquiry only affects the current ward boundary changes but I do believe with the growing population in new build, often gated communities in the inner city wards, you will have an eye on the future parliamentary review. If you wanted to make the electorate in central Bristol more coherent this could be done in two ways. Either a new ward in central Bristol drawing on adjacent 1 wards of Cabot, Dove Street, the areas of St Paul's and lower Montpelier on either side of Ashley Road and Lawrence Hill. Or by uniting areas which used to be in the same ward or simply shifting the population up through the constituency so that the north of Bishopston and Redland are reunited with parts of Horfield and Henleaze (Durdham) that used to be in the same ward. In terms of orientation, the new Redland Green School, gives a new dynamic to the immediate area of Redland/Bishopston. Cranbrook Road (east, evens) was included in the Bishopston. The Bishopston - Kuppam Link helped create community in Bristol by having street wardens (I was one) as well as supporting a similarly sized community in K V Kuppam, Tamil Nadu, India. Because of the daunting hill which cuts off older people and parents with push chairs from the polling station used in May 2014 at the last minute, and the Gloucester Road shops, people in this area have links not only with the people in St Andrew's but use the park there. In previous boundary changes I have been involved in, it has clearly been tempting to erect boundaries in terms of main roads, motorways, rail tracks, parks and some indeed initially create barriers. But often where communities have things in common, they will overcome barriers even the M32 and A38. The bottom of Ashley, minus the St Andrew's which has more in common with Gloucester Road and lower Redland share a park. Cromwell Road is currently in Ashley and Redland yet they both orientate to Gloucester Road. Perhaps you will draw on former boundary changes and revisit them. Redland was carved out of Cotham, Durdham and Bishopston. This changed the wards which with the growing inner city have northern polling districts which still orientate north rather than to the rest of their wards in the inner city. Perhaps they could be rejoined to Henleaze and Horfield if you decide to cross constituency boundaries. I have noticed that St Werburgh's has linked up with the other part of Baptist Mills now on the East of the M32 where Millpond School exists now but used to be Baptist Mills School where I was a school government. Cabot School in Halston Drive has many children from Easton. The shops on Ashley Road have shoppers from Dove Street, Cabot, as well as local residents of St Paul's. The people living in Banner and Norrisville, Albert and Brook Roads and Sussex Place have more in common with St Paul's than they do with either St Werburgh's than upper Montpelier. The people in the top of Montpelier despite the railway have much in common with the St Andrew's area. In many ways middle class people do not need councillors to show them the way through bureaucracy, or jumping the hoops, in the same way as recently arrived immigrants, established but ethnic minority communities and people who are transient in a constituency which has greater church than virtually any way else in the UK. I don't envy you your job of making sense of the city but I do think that wards containing students could have larger electorates since they draw on services at the University rather than call on councillors for help. I further believe that people in multioccupation, council and social housing, often have health, mental as well as physical, problems similar to each other and different from their neighbouring more middle class areas. These inner city or outer estates need to call on council support more often and therefore case loads are greater. This suggests they should have smaller populations not only because their registration rates are smaller. I believe Stephen Williams the current MP believes the population of Bristol West is near 120,000 than the registered population because of under registration. Best wishes and good luck, 2 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Ben Appleby E-mail: Organisation Name: Comment text: The wards need to be more equal in size Cabot in particular is huge , contains the whole city centre as well as several unconnected residential communities Ward boundaries should not divide high streets communities. the boundary between cabot and ashley runs through stokes croft. this means that different sides of the same community are in different neighbourhood partnerships. Stokes Croft. Until the recent riots the police beat boundary ran through stokes croft meaning that different teams policed the two sides of the road - very unhelpful. Same in whiteladies Rd, this high street needs all the help it can get but the ward boundary Clifton East / Cotham means that the two sides of the road are in different neighbourhood partnerships. Thes hgh streets should be at the centre of a ward not used as a convenient boundary More care needs to go into thinking about how the ward boundaries impact on neighbourhood partnerships. The big problem remains that \Bristol ends too soon areas that are wholly dependant on Bristol are not political part of the city. North Somerset starting immediately over the bridge is daft. South Glos has no reason to exist it is almost wholly dependant on Bristol, BANES should not control kingswood etc which are really all part of Bristol This is a real problem for Bristol and its role within the region Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3668 08/08/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Jane Armstrong E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I am happy with the boundary as it is for Ashley ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3584 24/07/2014 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Charlotte Ballard E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I live in Horfield and am happy with the current boundaries. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/3596 25/07/2014 Fuller, Heather From: Mary Bannerman < > Sent: 27 September 2014 11:10 To: Reviews@ Subject: Bristol wards Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Completed Dear sir or madam I understand that Bristol central wards are too large. Having lived in Redcliffe for nearly 20 years, I am only too well aware that in spite of being a well‐defined and lively community area, it suffers greatly from being in two wards. Lawrence Hill and Cabot are both high‐density urban areas, but Redcliffe is distinct from both and is marginal to both. Please could it be a ward on its own? Mary Bannerman 1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Keith Beresford E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Postcode , currently Stockwood, but makes far more sense to be Brislington.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Space in Horfield and Lockleaze
    Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 16/06/2010 13:58 Page 1 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:29 Page 2 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Horfield Lockleaze_new_text 09/06/2010 11:42 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page Gainsborough Square Park 8 1. Introduction 2 A city with good quality, Monks Park 9 2. Background 3 Horfield Common, including the Ardagh 10-11 attractive, enjoyable and Blake Road Open Space and 12 Rowlandson Gardens Open Space accessible green spaces which 3. Investment ideas and options to 7 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields 13 improve each open space within the area meet the diverse needs of all Dorian Road Playing Fields 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Turnout Mayoral
    Turnout by polling station Bristol Mayoral election November 2012 Bristol All All All 323,310 90,273 27.92 Postal Postal Citywide Postal 46,265 26,758 57.84 Eligible Polling Total Ballot Station votes Polling Polling Box Voters verified station District Ward Constituency Number per box turnout BHA Bishopsworth South 1 1,205 183 15.19 BHB Bishopsworth South 2 1,604 233 14.53 BHC Bishopsworth South 3 2,163 346 16.00 BHD Bishopsworth South 4 2,438 206 8.45 BRA Bedminster South 5 1,378 288 20.90 BRB Bedminster South 6 2,049 562 27.43 BRC Bedminster South 7 2,203 685 31.09 BRD Bedminster South 8 1,669 318 19.05 BRE Bedminster South 9 1,482 356 24.02 FDA Filwood South 10 2,383 267 11.20 FDB Filwood South 11 661 125 18.91 FDC Filwood South 12 2,245 263 11.71 FDD Filwood South 13 2,184 277 12.68 HEA Hartcliffe South 14 2,507 428 17.07 HEB Hartcliffe South 15 2,465 212 8.60 HEC Hartcliffe South 16 2,340 180 7.69 HVA Hengrove South 17 2,388 338 14.15 HVB Hengrove South 18 1,837 282 15.35 HVC Hengrove South 19 1,242 159 12.80 HVD Hengrove South 20 2,149 363 16.89 KEA1 Knowle South 21 2,327 681 29.27 KEB Knowle South 22 2,061 686 33.28 KEC Knowle South 23 1,431 251 17.54 KED Knowle South 24 1,642 194 11.81 SEA Southville South 25 1,343 476 35.44 SEA Southville South 26 1,363 395 28.98 SEB Southville South 27 2,520 978 38.81 SEC Southville South 28 1,270 405 31.89 SEC Southville South 29 1,393 439 31.51 SED Southville South 30 996 174 17.47 WLA Windmill South 31 1,159 345 29.77 WLB Windmill South 32 2,090 602 28.80 WLC Windmill South 33 1,903 573 30.11
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space in Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill
    Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • 1 Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 2 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_text 09/06/2010 11:18 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page A city with good quality, 1. Introduction 2 Riverside Park and Peel Street Green Space 9 Rawnsley Park 10-12 attractive, enjoyable and 2. Background 3 Mina Road Park 13 accessible green spaces which Hassell Drive Open Space 14-15 meet the diverse needs of all 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22
    SCHEDULE 1 Sites 1 – 226 below are those where nuisance behaviour that relates to the byelaws had been reported (2013). These are the original sites proposed to be covered by the byelaws in the earlier consultation 2013. 1 Albany Green Park, Lower Cheltenham Place, Ashley, Bristol 2 Allison Avenue Amenity Area, Allison Avenue, Brislington East, Bristol 3 Argyle Place Park, Argyle Place, Clifton, Bristol 4 Arnall Drive Open Space, Arnall Drive, Henbury, Bristol 5 Arnos Court Park, Bath Road, , Bristol 6 Ashley Street Park, Conduit Place, Ashley, Bristol 7 Ashton Court Estate, Clanage Road, , Bristol 8 Ashton Vale Playing Fields, Ashton Drive, Bedminster, Bristol 9 Avonmouth Park, Avonmouth Road, Avonmouth, Bristol 10 Badocks Wood, Doncaster Road, , Bristol 11 Barnard Park, Crow Lane, Henbury, Bristol 12 Barton Hill Road A/A, Barton Hill Road, Lawrence Hill, Bristol 13 Bedminster Common Open Space, Bishopsworth, Bristol 14 Begbrook Green Park, Frenchay Park Road, Frome Val e, Bristol 15 Blaise Castle Estate, Bristol 16 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields, Bonnington Walk, , Bristol 17 Bower Ashton Playing Field, Clanage Road, Southville, Bristol 18 Bradeston Grove & Sterncourt Road, Sterncourt Road, Frome Vale, Bristol 19 Brandon Hill Park, Charlotte Street, Cabot, Bristol 20 Bridgwater Road Amenity Area, Bridgwater Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol 21 Briery Leaze Road Open Space, Briery Leaze Road, Hengrove, Bristol 22 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (Central), Barrow Road, Bristol 23 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (East), New Station Way, , Bristol 24 Broadwalk
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol
    The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 Contents List of tables 4 List of figures 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction: what this report is about 8 2 Context: the debate about directly elected mayors in the UK 11 3 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project 15 4 Leadership in the community 21 5 Effective representation of the citizen 26 6 Legitimacy and accountability 31 7 Effectiveness in decision-making and implementation 34 8 Effective scrutiny of policy and performance 39 9 Responsiveness to local people 43 10 Strategic choices for urban governance in Bristol in 2025 45 Notes 50 Appendix 1: Survey research methods 51 Appendix 2: Socio-economic geography of Bristol 54 Appendix 3: Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 56 ward socio-economic category Appendix 4: Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 59 realm of leadership About the authors 61 Acknowledgements 62 3 List of tables 1 Bristol wards by socio-economic category 17 2 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 21 percent agree 3 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 23 percent agree 4 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 26 citizen, percent agree 5 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 28 citizen, percent agree,
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey Report on Individual Members Survey Consultation, Research and Intelligence Team May 2012 Page 1 of 21 | 1 | Contents Response Rates (including by postcode) 3 - 4 Services used (shown by Provider) 5 – 10 Frequency of use in last year 10 - 11 Quality of service provided 11 Reasons for use 12 Meeting travel needs 13 Importance of aspects of service provided 14 Reasons for not using 15 - 16 Other community transport used 17 Booking (including comment received) 17 - 18 Complaints and Improvements 18 – 19 Interest in Future participation 20 Equality analysis 21 Appendices A What other local travel needs do you have B Unable to use the service because of my impairment' ~ details C Reasons if ‘Difficult’ or ‘Very Difficult’ to book a journey D Specific locations that respondents most frequently use CT to travel to E Specific location in neighbouring authorities that respondents would regularly like to use CT to travel to F Other improvements respondents would like to see G Postcode Analysis of Community Transport Service Provider Membership at May 2012 Page 2 of 21 | 2 | Community Transport Individual Members Survey Note: Missing values are excluded from all tables Response Rate Questionnaire issued to the membership of the organisations listed below (Total=14,200). 2,322 questionnaires were returned giving response rate of 16.4%. Table 1. Response by Organisation Organisation Membership Number Response Returned Bristol Community Transport 274 266 97.1 (BCT) Bristol Dial a Ride (BDAR) 12542 1368 10.9 Mede Sprint 447 214 47.9 Catt Bus (HWCP) 478 345 72.2 Lawrence Weston Community 156 91 58.3 Transport (LWCT) St Philips Taxi Sharing 303 62 20.5 Scheme • Very high response for BCT • High response for HWCP • Approx 1in 2 response for Mede and LWCT • Low response for St Philips Taxi sharing scheme • Very low response for BDAR Issue of questionnaires coincided with a full review of Bristol Dial A ride Membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation
    Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation DRAFT REPORT v2.0 Consultation Research and Intelligence Team April 2013 1 CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology 2 Analysis 2 Response 2 - 5 Main Findings 6 - 25 SUMMARY 6 - 7 Do you feel you know what’s going on in your area? 8 Do you attend local meetings about local issues? 9 If you don’t attend local meetings about local issues, what stops you? 10 Heard of Your local Neighbourhood Partnership? 11 Heard of Neighbourhood Forums? 12 Taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum 13 Taken part in other local meetings 14 What like if : Participation in ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Taken part in other local meetings’ combined 15 What Like if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 16 How could be improved if: If attend Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum or Other Local meetings 17 How could be improved if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 18 Aware NP make decisions on highways etc 19 Do you think it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions 20 Do you think enough decisions about council services are made locally? 21 Would you like to be involved/continue to be involved in local decision-making? 22 How would you like to be involved in local decision-making? 23 What is the best time / day to have community meetings? 24 How do you find out information about your neighbourhood? 25 OPEN COMMENT ANALYSIS 'What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the future? 26 If you attend neighbourhood partnership / neighbourhood forums/local meetings, how do you think that forums and other local meetings could be made better? 27 Equalities Profile 28 Appendix A ACORN Profile of Respondents by NP area and Overal l Appendix B Equality Analysis on selected questions 2 Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Final Report Introduction The consultation was commissioned by the Neighbourhood Partnership Management Team and undertaken by BCC Research Consultation and Intelligence Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014
    Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014 Total Working Age Older People population Children (0- (16-64 year (65 years and LSOA11 Code LSOA11 Name LSOA11 Local name Ward (all ages) 15 year olds) olds) over) E01014485 Bristol 023A Mina Road Ashley 1,831 353 1,310 168 E01014486 Bristol 023B St Agnes Ashley 2,397 456 1,812 129 E01014487 Bristol 020A Cromwell Road Ashley 2,012 270 1,632 110 E01014488 Bristol 023C Upper Montpelier Ashley 1,977 324 1,524 129 E01014489 Bristol 023D Lower Montpelier Ashley 2,482 341 2,027 114 E01014491 Bristol 020B Ashley Hill Ashley 2,003 408 1,488 107 E01033347 Bristol 023F St Pauls Portland Square Ashley 1,234 196 993 45 E01033348 Bristol 023G St Pauls City Road Ashley 1,135 227 889 19 E01033366 Bristol 023H St Pauls Grosvenor Road Ashley 1,592 590 918 84 E01014492 Bristol 008A Shirehampton Centre Avonmouth 1,575 269 967 339 E01014493 Bristol 008B Barrow Hill Avonmouth 1,473 299 953 221 E01014494 Bristol 008C Shirehampton Portway Avonmouth 1,508 243 979 286 E01014495 Bristol 008D Woodwell Road Avonmouth 1,663 278 1,031 354 E01014496 Bristol 008E Avonmouth Docks Avonmouth 1,688 377 1,142 169 E01014497 Bristol 003A Lawrence Weston West Avonmouth 1,567 366 972 229 E01014498 Bristol 003B Kingsweston Avenue Avonmouth 1,621 439 975 207 E01014499 Bristol 008F Avonmouth Village Avonmouth 1,635 332 1,055 248 E01014500 Bristol 039A Parson Street Bedminster 1,599 273 1,091 235 E01014501 Bristol
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol City Council Polling Districts
    Bristol City Council Polling districts AVONMOUTH A SOUTHMEAD A HENBURY D HENBURY C HENBURY A HENBURY B KINGSWESTON A SOUTHMEAD B SOUTHMEAD D KINGSWESTON B SOUTHMEAD C HORFIELD A WESTBURY ON TRYM A HORFIELD B AVONMOUTH C AVONMOUTH B KINGSWESTON C WESTBURY ON TRYM D LOCKLEAZE A WESTBURY ON TRYM B HORFIELD D HORFIELD C LOCKLEAZE B AVONMOUTH D FROME VALE A AVONMOUTH E FROME VALE C HENLEAZE A HORFIELD E HENLEAZE B STOKE LOCKLEAZE A KINGSWESTON D BISHOP A WESTBURY ON TRYM C AVONMOUTH F FROME VALE B BISHOPSTON D LOCKLEAZE C BISHOPSTON A EASTVILLE A FROME VALE D HENLEAZE C STOKE BISHOP B STOKE BISHOP C REDLAND A HILLFIELDS B BISHOPSTON B BISHOPSTON C EASTVILLE B LOCKLEAZE D HILLFIELDS A REDLAND B REDLAND C EASTVILLE C REDLAND D ASHLEY A HILLFIELDS C ASHLEY C STOKE BISHOP D COTHAM A HILLFIELDS E HILLFIELDS D CLIFTON EAST A ASHLEY B EASTVILLE D EASTON A COTHAM D COTHAM B COTHAM C CLIFTON EAST B ST GEORGE WEST D EASTON D EASTON B ASHLEY D LAWRENCE HILL A ASHLEY E ST GEORGE EAST D ST GEORGE WEST A CABOT B ST GEORGE WEST C CABOT C ST GEORGE EAST A CLIFTON A CLIFTON EAST C LAWRENCE HILL B CABOT A LAWRENCE HILL C ST GEORGE WEST B CLIFTON C EASTON C CLIFTON B LAWRENCE HILL E CABOT G ST GEORGE EAST B CABOT D ST GEORGE EAST C CLIFTON E CLIFTON D LAWRENCE HILL D BRISLINGTON EAST A LAWRENCE HILL F BRISLINGTON EAST B CABOT E CABOT F BRISLINGTON WEST A WINDMILL HILL A SOUTHVILLE A SOUTHVILLE B SOUTHVILLE C SOUTHVILLE D BRISLINGTON EAST C WINDMILL HILL C BRISLINGTON WEST C WINDMILL HILL D WINDMILL HILL B BRISLINGTON WEST B BEDMINSTER E BEDMINSTER C BRISLINGTON EAST D KNOWLE B BEDMINSTER B KNOWLE A BEDMINSTER A WINDMILL HILL E BEDMINSTER D FILWOOD B BRISLINGTON WEST D KNOWLE C FILWOOD A KNOWLE D BISHOPSWORTH B STOCKWOOD A BRISLINGTON WEST E BISHOPSWORTH A FILWOOD D STOCKWOOD C HENGROVE A FILWOOD C HARTCLIFFE A STOCKWOOD B STOCKWOOD E BISHOPSWORTH C HENGROVE C HENGROVE B STOCKWOOD D STOCKWOOD F HARTCLIFFE C BISHOPSWORTH D WHITCHURCH PARK B HARTCLIFFE B HENGROVE D WHITCHURCH PARK C WHITCHURCH PARK D WHITCHURCH PARK A WHITCHURCH PARK E.
    [Show full text]
  • Parishes Churches and Chapels on BAFHS Cds Or WEBSITE Formatted
    BAFHS PUBLICATIONS on CD or on the WEBSITE THE BRISTOL and AVON AREA PARISHES, CHURCHES and CHAPELS COVERED TO DATE (Dec 2009) Tithes Baptisms Baptisms Baptisms Baptisms Marriages Marriages Marriages Marriages Burials Burials Burials Vol 8-10 Vol 11-14 Vol 1-7 Non-Conformist Vol 9 Vol 10 Vol 8 Vol 11 Vol 3 (They lived (ON WEBSITE) North Som. South Glos. in Bristol) South Glos. 1754-1812 1754-1812 1813-1837 1754-1837 1754-1812 1754-1837 1813-1837 1837-1901 1754-1812 1813-1837 1813-1871 Abbots Leigh (Holy Trinity) y y y y y y y Abson (St. James) - see Wick y All Saints - Bristol y y y y y y Almondsbury (St. Mary The Virgin) y y y y y y y y Alveston (St. Helen) y y y y y y y y Aust (St. John) y y y y y Aust Chapel y Backwell (St. Andrew) y Banwell (St. Andrew) y Barrow Gurney (St. Mary the Virgin and Edward the Martyr) y Bath Abbey (St's Peter & Paul) y Bath (St. James) y Bath (St. Michael) y Bathampton (St. Nicholas) y Batheaston (Good Shepherd) y Bathford (St. Swithin) y Bathwick (St. Mary) y Bedminster (St. John) - Bristol y y y y y y y Bitton (St. Mary) y y y y y y y y Blagdon (St. Andrew) y Bleadon (St. Peter and Paul) y Bridge Street Congregational Chapel - Bristol y Brislington (St. Luke) - Bristol y y y y y y y Bristol Cathedral - Bristol y y y British Road Ebenezer Chapel, Bedminster - Bristol y Broadmead Baptist Church - Bristol y y Broadmead Welsh Chapel - Bristol y Brockley (St.
    [Show full text]
  • Byelaws for Pleasure Grounds, Public Walks and Open Spaces
    BRISTOL CITY COUNCIL BYELAWS FOR PLEASURE GROUNDS, PUBLIC WALKS AND OPEN SPACES ARRANGEMENT OF BYELAWS PART 1 GENERAL 1. General interpretation 2. Application 3. Opening times PART 2 PROTECTION OF THE GROUND, ITS WILDLIFE AND THE PUBLIC 4. Protection of structures and plants 5. Unauthorised erection of structures 6. Grazing 7. Protection of wildlife 8. Camping 9. Fires 10. Missiles 11. Interference with life-saving equipment PART 3 HORSES, CYCLES AND VEHICLES 12. Interpretation of Part 3 13. Horses 14. Cycling 15. Motor vehicles 16. Overnight parking PART 4 PLAY AREAS, GAMES AND SPORTS 17. Interpretation of Part 4 18. Archery 19. Field sports 20. Golf PART 5 WATERWAYS 21. Interpretation of Part 5 22. Fishing 23. Blocking of watercourses PART 6 MODEL AIRCRAFT 24. Interpretation of Part 6 25. Model aircraft PART 7 OTHER REGULATED ACTIVITIES 26. Provision of services 27. Excessive noise 28. Public shows and performances 29. Aircraft, hang-gliders and hot air balloons PART 8 MISCELLANEOUS 30. Obstruction 31. Savings 32. Removal of offenders 33. Penalty 34. Revocation 2 SCHEDULE 1 Grounds to which byelaws apply generally SCHEDULE 2 Grounds to which byelaw 13 does not apply Byelaws made under section 164 of the Public Health Act 1875, section 15 of the Open Spaces Act 1906 and sections 12 and 15 of the Open Spaces Act 1906 by the Bristol City Council with respect to the pleasure grounds, public walks and open spaces specified in Schedule 1. PART 1 GENERAL General Interpretation 1. In these byelaws: “the Council” means the City Council of Bristol
    [Show full text]
  • FOOD POVERTY in BRISTOL the Matthew Tree Project © TMTP APRIL 2013
    FOOD POVERTY in BRISTOL The Matthew Tree Project © TMTP APRIL 2013 The Matthew Tree Project, registered office address: 5 Jupiter House, Calleva Park, Aldermaston, Reading RG7 8NN The Matthew Tree Project is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales number: 7324296. Registered charity number: 1146401 © TMTP 2013 INDEX 1 BACKGROUND: Introduction – The Problem of Hunger 1.1 What does ending hunger mean? 1.2 The Effects on Behaviour of a Poor or Non-existent Diet 1.3 Why it Matters to Society not to ignore this need 1.4 The Size of the Problem 2 What is the solution? 2.1 How does it Work? 2.2 How is it funded? 3 Finding Enough Food to Meet the Need 3.1 Food appeal collections 3.2 Food rescue 3.3 Purchasing 3.4 Fareshare 3.5 Churches and other organisations 4 Conclusion The Matthew Tree Project, registered office address: 5 Jupiter House, Calleva Park, Aldermaston, Reading RG7 8NN The Matthew Tree Project is a company limited by guarantee, registered in England and Wales number: 7324296. Registered charity number: 1146401 © TMTP 2013 1. BACKGROUND Introduction: The Problem of hunger Food insecurity and hunger are very real problems in Bristol. Though the U.K. has long been among the richest nations in the world, our national income poverty rate in 2010 was 22% (13.4 million people). Of those individuals and families living above the poverty line, many can easily be plunged into a financial crisis by a lost job, a health emergency, a broken down car, a stolen purse, or other unexpected expense or loss of income.
    [Show full text]