DOCSLIB.ORG

Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation DRAFT REPORT v2.0 Consultation Research and Intelligence Team April 2013 1 CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology 2 Analysis 2 Response 2 - 5 Main Findings 6 - 25 SUMMARY 6 - 7 Do you feel you know what’s going on in your area? 8 Do you attend local meetings about local issues? 9 If you don’t attend local meetings about local issues, what stops you? 10 Heard of Your local Neighbourhood Partnership? 11 Heard of Neighbourhood Forums? 12 Taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum 13 Taken part in other local meetings 14 What like if : Participation in ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Taken part in other local meetings’ combined 15 What Like if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 16 How could be improved if: If attend Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum or Other Local meetings 17 How could be improved if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 18 Aware NP make decisions on highways etc 19 Do you think it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions 20 Do you think enough decisions about council services are made locally? 21 Would you like to be involved/continue to be involved in local decision-making? 22 How would you like to be involved in local decision-making? 23 What is the best time / day to have community meetings? 24 How do you find out information about your neighbourhood? 25 OPEN COMMENT ANALYSIS 'What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the future? 26 If you attend neighbourhood partnership / neighbourhood forums/local meetings, how do you think that forums and other local meetings could be made better? 27 Equalities Profile 28 Appendix A ACORN Profile of Respondents by NP area and Overal l Appendix B Equality Analysis on selected questions 2 Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Final Report Introduction The consultation was commissioned by the Neighbourhood Partnership Management Team and undertaken by BCC Research Consultation and Intelligence Team. The consultation ran from 1 st February 2013 until 1 st April 2013. The following text ws listed on the Consukltation Finder entry: “The Mayor of Bristol is dedicated to giving local communities more influence over their neighbourhoods. We want to develop our Neighbourhood Partnerships and to bring more influence and decision-making about local services to local communities. In order to do this, we would like to hear from our citizens about what they would like more control and responsibility for in their neighbourhoods, and about how they would like to take part in local decision making. The information gained from this survey will be used alongside detailed consultation within each neighbourhood to improve our Neighbourhood Partnerships. We want to ensure that we design our service based on what our citizens tell us.” Methodology An online questionnaire and background information was available via the City Council Consultation Finder portal on the Council website: https://www.citizenspace.com/bristol/neighbourhoods/npreview The survey link was widely publicized and a paper copy of the questionnaire was also made available for completion by those with restricted access to the internet. The online questionnaire was also available via SNAP Mobile enabling fieldworkers in each of the neighbourhood partnership areas to gather responses in the community using ipad/tablets. Analysis Responses to each question are shown in both tablular and chart form. The tables display both counts and percentages whilst the charts shown percentages only. Where appropriate responses are shown by Neighbourhood Partnership Area and by ‘overall’ for comparison. Note: missing values are excluded in most tables. The total (base) used is given in each table. The main observations from each question are bulleted underneath each table. 3 Response There were 3101 returns in total. 161 from the fieldwork surveys and 2940 from the online survey. Data Collection Neighbourhood Partnership Area Approach Tablet Online Total missing Count 25 215 240 % 10.4 89.6 100.0 Outside area Count 1 25 26 % 3.8 96.2 100.0 Avonmouth and Kingsweston Count 2 235 237 % .8 99.2 100.0 Henbury and Southmead Count 24 236 260 % 9.2 90.8 100.0 Henleaze, Stoke Bishop and Westbury-on- Count 2 170 172 Trym % 1.2 98.8 100.0 Horfield and Lockleaze Count 1 89 90 % 1.1 98.9 100.0 Eastville, Hillfields and Frome Vale Count 22 95 117 % 18.8 81.2 100.0 Bishopston, Cotham and Redland Count 1 266 267 % .4 99.6 100.0 Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East Count 45 76 121 % 37.2 62.8 100.0 Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Count 5 420 425 % 1.2 98.8 100.0 St George East and St George West Count 7 89 96 % 7.3 92.7 100.0 Bedminster and Southville Count 25 99 124 % 20.2 79.8 100.0 Filwood, Knowle and Windmill Hill Count 1 208 209 % .5 99.5 100.0 Brislington East and Brislington West Count 0 162 162 % .0 100.0 100.0 Bishopsworth, Hartcliffe and Whitchurch Count 0 319 319 Park % .0 100.0 100.0 Hengrove and Stockwood Count 0 236 236 % .0 100.0 100.0 Total Count 161 2940 3101 % 5.2% 94.8% 100.0% 4 The overall response by neighbourhood partnership area is shown below: Neighbourhood Partnership Area Frequency Percent Outside area 26 .8 Horfield and Lockleaze 90 2.9 St George East and St George West 96 3.1 Eastville, Hillfields and Frome Vale 117 3.8 Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East 121 3.9 Bedminster and Southville 124 4.0 Brislington East and Brislington West 162 5.2 Henleaze, Stoke Bishop and Westbury-on-Trym 172 5.5 Filwood, Knowle and Windmill Hill 209 6.7 Hengrove and Stockwood 236 7.6 Avonmouth and Kingsweston 237 7.6 missing 240 7.7 Henbury and Southmead 260 8.4 Bishopston, Cotham and Redland 267 8.6 Bishopsworth, Hartcliffe and Whitchurch Park 319 10.3 Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill 425 13.7 Total/Base 3101 100.0 Response by Neighbourhood Partnership Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Bishopsworth, Hartcliffe and Whitchurch Park Bishopston, Cotham and Redland Henbury and Southmead missing Avonmouth and Kingsweston Hengrove and Stockwood Filwood, Knowle and Windmill Hill Henleaze, Stoke Bishop and Westbury-on-Trym Brislington East and Brislington West Bedminster and Southville Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East Eastville, Hillfields and Frome Vale St George East and St George West Horfield and Lockleaze Outside area 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 percent 5 Main findings SUMMARY • The consultation attracted a good response • There were good levels of responder awareness of what was going on their area but there were notable differences between the NP areas. Highest: Bedminster and Southville and Lowest Brislington East and Brislington West . • About a third of respondents said they attended local meetings. Again there were notable differences between the NP areas. Highest attendance in Henleaze, Stoke Bishop and lowest in Hengrove. • The main reason for non attendance was lack of time (1 in 5). Time of day was identified by approx 1 in 8 respondents and 1 in 10 would prefer online options. • Overall approx 2 in 3 had heard of their Neighbourhood Partnership but there were large discrepancies in awareness between NP areas. Highest awareness in Henleaze,Stoke Bishop and lowest awareness in Hengrove and Stockwood. • Overall approx 2 in 3 heard of Neighbourhood Forums. Highest awareness in Henleaze,Stoke Bishop and Westbury-on-Trym. The lowest awareness was in Hengrove and Stockwood. • Overall approximately 1 in 5 had taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum. There were wide differences between NP areas. Higest participation in Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East and Lowest participation in Hengrove and Stockwood. • Overall approximately 1 in 3 had taken part in ‘other local meetings’. There were wide differences between NP areas. Highest participation in Horfield and Lockleaze and lowest participation in Hengrove and Stockwood. • Of respondents who attended either ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Other local meeting’, they particularly liked aspects of findings out what was going on in their neighbourhood (2 in 3) influencing (1 in 2) and speaking to providers (1 in 2). There was less liking of ‘concerns being taken seriously’ (1 in 3) and of ‘organisation issues’ (1) • Suggestions for improving NP/local meetings highlighted ‘better advertising’ as the main issue (1 in 2) followed by (1 in 3) suggesting ‘improved feedback’, ‘linking to other group meetings in the area’ and better links to ‘community groups’. • Overall approx 1 in 2 were aware that NP make decisions on highways etc. Highest awareness in Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East and Lowest 6 awareness in Hengrove and Stockwood • There was an overwhelming majority of respondents who thought that ‘it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions’. This was consistently high across all NP areas. • Only 1 in 5 respondents though that ‘enough decisions about council services are made locally’. Highest level of agreement in Cabot, Clifton and Clifton East (1 in 3) and lowest level in Eastville, Hillfields and Frome Vale (1 in 7) • Overall approx 1 in 2 wish to be more involved in local decision making. Less differential between NP areas. Highest in Horfield and Lockleaze (2 in 3) andLowest in Hengrove and Stockwood (1 in 3) • Preference for evening meetings at mixture of times. Far less interest in weekend meetings. • Most (1 in 2) found information about their neighbourhood via ‘word of word of mouth’ and ‘local newspapers’. 1 in 5 hear via BCC website and 1 in 7 via social media • The top 5 suggestion s from the open question: What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Space in Horfield and Lockleaze
    Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 16/06/2010 13:58 Page 1 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:29 Page 2 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Horfield Lockleaze_new_text 09/06/2010 11:42 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page Gainsborough Square Park 8 1. Introduction 2 A city with good quality, Monks Park 9 2. Background 3 Horfield Common, including the Ardagh 10-11 attractive, enjoyable and Blake Road Open Space and 12 Rowlandson Gardens Open Space accessible green spaces which 3. Investment ideas and options to 7 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields 13 improve each open space within the area meet the diverse needs of all Dorian Road Playing Fields 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Plan 2013-2018 Achieving the Vision the Road Ahead
    St Pauls Advice Centre The road ahead Strategic Plan 2013-2018 Achieving the vision The road ahead Contents Chair’s foreword 3 Core values 13 Our history 4 Strategic priorities 14 Our challenge 6 Strategic direction 20 Our services 7 Financial plan 22 Our future 8 Management team 24 Charitable aims 12 2 St Pauls Advice Centre has been a community resource at the heart of St Pauls for four decades. Our strategic plan sets out how we will continue to be one of Bristol’s key independent legal advice centres for the future. We have met and adapted to many Trustees and staff have worked changes in our time, while staying true together to agree five strategic to our core purpose of supporting priorities and a strategic direction, citizenship by providing reliable which will clarify the focus for our advice. The challenges we face now, future work and the outcomes we alongside many community groups, aspire to achieve. We will make this are unprecedented in their scale plan the backbone of SPAC, aligning and rapidity. This tough working our policies, procedures, services and environment is unlikely to change values with it. If we are to succeed significantly over the next five years. over the next five years, it is vital that the plan permeates all that we do We have reviewed our mission, taken a and is embraced by trustees, staff and fresh look at the values that underpin volunteers alike. our ethos and the vision that drives us. This review will be a firm foundation on Laura Corballis, Chair which we can build our future for the St Pauls Advice Centre benefit of clients and stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol Local Plan Review: Policies and Site Allocations Proposed to Be
    Bristol Local Plan Review: Policies and site allocations proposed to be retained The following Bristol Local Plan policies and site allocations were proposed to be retained in the Bristol Local Plan Review consultation (March 2019). Core Strategy (July 2011) Policies • BCS7: Centres and retailing • BCS9: Green Infrastructure • BCS12: Community facilities • BCS16: Flood risk and water management • BCS21: Quality urban design • BCS22: Conservation and the historic environment Site Allocations and Development Management Policies (June 2014) Community Facilities policies • DM5: Protection of Community Facilities • DM6: Public Houses Centres and Retailing policies • DM7: Town Centre Uses • DM8: Shopping areas and frontages • DM9: Local centres • DM10: Food and drink uses and the evening economy • DM11: Markets Health policies • DM14: The Health Impacts of Development Green Infrastructure policies • DM15: Green Infrastructure Provision • DM16: Open Space for Recreation Bristol Local Plan Review: Policies and site allocations proposed to be retained • DM17: Development involving existing green infrastructure (Trees and Urban Landscape) • DM19: Development and Nature Conservation • DM20: Regionally Important Geological Sites • DM21: Private Gardens • DM22: Development Adjacent to Waterways Transport and Movement policies • DM23: Transport Development Management • DM25: Greenways Design and Conservation policies • DM27: Layout and form • DM28: Public Realm • DM29: Design of New Buildings • DM30: Alterations to Existing Buildings • DM31: Heritage
    [Show full text]
  • Station Turnout Mayoral
    Turnout by polling station Bristol Mayoral election November 2012 Bristol All All All 323,310 90,273 27.92 Postal Postal Citywide Postal 46,265 26,758 57.84 Eligible Polling Total Ballot Station votes Polling Polling Box Voters verified station District Ward Constituency Number per box turnout BHA Bishopsworth South 1 1,205 183 15.19 BHB Bishopsworth South 2 1,604 233 14.53 BHC Bishopsworth South 3 2,163 346 16.00 BHD Bishopsworth South 4 2,438 206 8.45 BRA Bedminster South 5 1,378 288 20.90 BRB Bedminster South 6 2,049 562 27.43 BRC Bedminster South 7 2,203 685 31.09 BRD Bedminster South 8 1,669 318 19.05 BRE Bedminster South 9 1,482 356 24.02 FDA Filwood South 10 2,383 267 11.20 FDB Filwood South 11 661 125 18.91 FDC Filwood South 12 2,245 263 11.71 FDD Filwood South 13 2,184 277 12.68 HEA Hartcliffe South 14 2,507 428 17.07 HEB Hartcliffe South 15 2,465 212 8.60 HEC Hartcliffe South 16 2,340 180 7.69 HVA Hengrove South 17 2,388 338 14.15 HVB Hengrove South 18 1,837 282 15.35 HVC Hengrove South 19 1,242 159 12.80 HVD Hengrove South 20 2,149 363 16.89 KEA1 Knowle South 21 2,327 681 29.27 KEB Knowle South 22 2,061 686 33.28 KEC Knowle South 23 1,431 251 17.54 KED Knowle South 24 1,642 194 11.81 SEA Southville South 25 1,343 476 35.44 SEA Southville South 26 1,363 395 28.98 SEB Southville South 27 2,520 978 38.81 SEC Southville South 28 1,270 405 31.89 SEC Southville South 29 1,393 439 31.51 SED Southville South 30 996 174 17.47 WLA Windmill South 31 1,159 345 29.77 WLB Windmill South 32 2,090 602 28.80 WLC Windmill South 33 1,903 573 30.11
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space in Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill
    Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • 1 Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 2 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_text 09/06/2010 11:18 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page A city with good quality, 1. Introduction 2 Riverside Park and Peel Street Green Space 9 Rawnsley Park 10-12 attractive, enjoyable and 2. Background 3 Mina Road Park 13 accessible green spaces which Hassell Drive Open Space 14-15 meet the diverse needs of all 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Bridge Over the River Avon Being Considered Once More
    THE WEEK IN East Bristol & North East Somerset FREE Issue 644 9th September 2020 Read by more than 40,000 people each week Bridge over the River Avon being considered once more Wessex Water is once needs to be upgraded in faces is how to get works without the need to travel Council had screened the to Saltford Parish Council to again exploring the order to both improve the traffic to and from the site. through Saltford village, as proposals from an advise that it had exhausted prospect of a bridge across quality of water and handle The company engaged well as open up leisure environmental point of view all the alternative options the River Avon from the increased demand from consultants to evaluate the access for pedestrians and and said there would be no and was considering the Swineford to Saltford. new housing schemes in prospect of a 25ft high cyclists. Last August (Issue significant impacts. bridge option once more. The water recycling centre Bath and the local area. But bridge across the river which 589) we reported that Bath While the prospect of a Continued on page 2 at Mead Lane in Saltford the problem Wessex Water could serve Mead Lane & North East Somerset pedestrian crossing was welcomed, there were major concerns in the Bitton and Swineford area over the increase in traffic and the junction with the A431 which would have been necessary. Wessex Water ultimately decided not to pursue the The plan produced by Atkins last year project but last week wrote Also in this EE apologises for lost Deadlock over Keynsham students left Popular Oldland pub mobile phone service Brislington housing plan stranded without bus on the market week’s issue .
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22
    SCHEDULE 1 Sites 1 – 226 below are those where nuisance behaviour that relates to the byelaws had been reported (2013). These are the original sites proposed to be covered by the byelaws in the earlier consultation 2013. 1 Albany Green Park, Lower Cheltenham Place, Ashley, Bristol 2 Allison Avenue Amenity Area, Allison Avenue, Brislington East, Bristol 3 Argyle Place Park, Argyle Place, Clifton, Bristol 4 Arnall Drive Open Space, Arnall Drive, Henbury, Bristol 5 Arnos Court Park, Bath Road, , Bristol 6 Ashley Street Park, Conduit Place, Ashley, Bristol 7 Ashton Court Estate, Clanage Road, , Bristol 8 Ashton Vale Playing Fields, Ashton Drive, Bedminster, Bristol 9 Avonmouth Park, Avonmouth Road, Avonmouth, Bristol 10 Badocks Wood, Doncaster Road, , Bristol 11 Barnard Park, Crow Lane, Henbury, Bristol 12 Barton Hill Road A/A, Barton Hill Road, Lawrence Hill, Bristol 13 Bedminster Common Open Space, Bishopsworth, Bristol 14 Begbrook Green Park, Frenchay Park Road, Frome Val e, Bristol 15 Blaise Castle Estate, Bristol 16 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields, Bonnington Walk, , Bristol 17 Bower Ashton Playing Field, Clanage Road, Southville, Bristol 18 Bradeston Grove & Sterncourt Road, Sterncourt Road, Frome Vale, Bristol 19 Brandon Hill Park, Charlotte Street, Cabot, Bristol 20 Bridgwater Road Amenity Area, Bridgwater Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol 21 Briery Leaze Road Open Space, Briery Leaze Road, Hengrove, Bristol 22 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (Central), Barrow Road, Bristol 23 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (East), New Station Way, , Bristol 24 Broadwalk
    [Show full text]
  • And Still Making a Difference
    Support Against Racist Incidents years And still making a difference Annual Report 2011-2012 Contentswith Current Trustees Esther Vikash ʻAs S.A.R.I. has Chairʼs Report: 3 got bigger it has got a good reputation of Directorʼs Report: 4 ʻWhen S.A.R.I. came making a difference.ʼ along my problems were Assistant Directorʼs Report: 5 over.ʼ Trustees: 6 Training: 7 Housing Association partners: 8 Richard Buba Education: 10 Ashfield YOI: 11 Discrimination: 12 21st Anniversary: 14 Vinodkumar Panna Bristol City Council: 17 South Gloucestershire Council: 18 ʻS.A.R.I. makes peoplesʼ lives North Somerset/ B&NES: 19 better.....and helps them realise that life Bristol Youth Offending Team: 20 is not that bad.ʼ Arlene Childʼs Play: 21 Consultancy: 22 ʻBefore S.A.R.I. came along people didnʼt know Avon & Somerset Constabulary: 23 what to do when racism was reported.ʼ Statistics: 24 Maya Area of Incident: 25 Finance Report: 26 Funders: 27 Irvin Kathryn Matthew Charity Number: 1047699 Company Number: 3060925 Chair’s Report Welcome to our Annual Report.This year S.A.R.I. reached a 21 year milestone. We had planned to celebrate this success but with the austerity measures that are affecting us all we decided to cancel this event. The cuts have deeply affected S.A.R.I. and our team are working creatively to maintain standards and meet targets. Examples are: • Beginning the task of changing S.A.R.I.’s charitable objectives to allow us to help all victims of Hate Crime. • Preparing for the submission of our application to be considered for the commissioning of the Hate Crime Services in Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Report Executive Summary
    2016 Report Executive Summary INTRODUCTION This executive summary outlines the Happy City Pulse purpose and framework, and the headline findings from the 2016 Bristol Pilot. It aims to show how such data can inform local policy1 and cities now and in the future. Contents page Background to the project . .3–6 Happiness pulse framework . .7–8 2016 Pilot results . 9 Part 1: Overall picture of wellbeing . 10–13 Part 2: Wellbeing resilient wards . .14–18 Next steps . .19 1 We also have a range of case studies available demonstrating the role it can play for organisations Happiness Pulse: Executive Summary 2016 page 2 Why this and why now? Increasingly, economists, politicians, academics and environmentalists are recognising that we need to improve what and how we measure and define progress. Wellbeing is emerging as the front-runner as it encompassing elements of so much of our lives – including health, education, economy, environment and justice. Whilst much work is emerging at an international or national level on this, there is a significant gap when it comes to local scale change, despite the major pressures of urbanisation globally. Happy City is leading the field in providing innovative yet practical solutions to delivering real wellbeing improvement at a city-scale. 81% of Britons believe that the Government should prioritise creating the greatest happiness, not the greatest wealth. 81% of Britons believe that the Government should prioritise creating the greatest happiness, not the greatest wealth. statistic Happiness Pulse: Executive Summary 2016 page 3 A new measure of city wellbeing Policymakers and citizens in cities around the world are beginning to see the power of measuring wellbeing for public policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Hengrove Park Bristol
    LAND AT HENGROVE PARK BRISTOL ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION CA PROJECT: 1953 CA REPORT: 05072 Author: Allen Wright Approved: Simon Cox Signed: ……………………………………………………………. Issue: 01 Date: 28 APRIL 2005 This report is confidential to the client. Cotswold Archaeology accepts no responsibility or liability to any third party to whom this report, or any part of it, is made known. Any such party relies upon this report entirely at their own risk. No part of this report may be reproduced by any means without permission. © Cotswold Archaeology Building 11, Kemble Enterprise Park, Cirencester, Gloucestershire, GL7 6BQ Tel. 01285 771022 Fax. 01285 771033 E-mail: [email protected] Land at Hengrove Park, Bristol: Archaeological Evaluation © Cotswold Archaeology CONTENTS SUMMARY........................................................................................................................2 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................. 3 The site ................................................................................................................ 3 Archaeological background.................................................................................. 3 Archaeological objectives .................................................................................... 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 4 2. RESULTS ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 515 Bus Service Valid from January 2019
    .travelwest.info www BD11449 DesignedandprintedonsustainablysourcedmaterialbyBristolDesign,CityCouncil–January2019 on 0117 922 2910 922 0117 on CD-ROM or plain text please contact Bristol City Council Council City Bristol contact please text plain or CD-ROM Braille, audio tape, large print, easy English, BSL video, video, BSL English, easy print, large tape, audio Braille, If you would like this information in another language, language, another in information this like would you If Hartcliffe – Imperial Park Imperial – Hartcliffe Whitchurch – Hengrove Park – Park Hengrove – Whitchurch Stockwood – Hengrove – Hengrove – Stockwood Valid from January 2019 January from Valid Bus Service Bus 515 www.travelwest.info/bus other bus services in Bristol is available at: available is Bristol in services bus other Timetable, route and fares information for service 515 and and 515 service for information fares and route Timetable, Produced by Sustainable Transport. Sustainable by Produced www.bristolcommunitytransport.org.uk w: [email protected] e: contract by Bristol Community Transport. Community Bristol by contract 0117 941 3713 941 0117 t: under operated is and Council City Bristol please contact Bristol Community Transport: Community Bristol contact please Service 515 is financially supported by by supported financially is 515 Service enquiries property lost and information fares For 0 37 A SS PA holidays. public [email protected] Y e: B N O ST except Saturday to Monday operates service The A 2910 922 0117 t: G N LO Information
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol
    The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 Contents List of tables 4 List of figures 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction: what this report is about 8 2 Context: the debate about directly elected mayors in the UK 11 3 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project 15 4 Leadership in the community 21 5 Effective representation of the citizen 26 6 Legitimacy and accountability 31 7 Effectiveness in decision-making and implementation 34 8 Effective scrutiny of policy and performance 39 9 Responsiveness to local people 43 10 Strategic choices for urban governance in Bristol in 2025 45 Notes 50 Appendix 1: Survey research methods 51 Appendix 2: Socio-economic geography of Bristol 54 Appendix 3: Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 56 ward socio-economic category Appendix 4: Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 59 realm of leadership About the authors 61 Acknowledgements 62 3 List of tables 1 Bristol wards by socio-economic category 17 2 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 21 percent agree 3 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 23 percent agree 4 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 26 citizen, percent agree 5 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 28 citizen, percent agree,
    [Show full text]