DOCSLIB.ORG

Station Turnout Mayoral

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Station Turnout Mayoral Turnout by polling station Bristol Mayoral election November 2012 Bristol All All All 323,310 90,273 27.92 Postal Postal Citywide Postal 46,265 26,758 57.84 Eligible Polling Total Ballot Station votes Polling Polling Box Voters verified station District Ward Constituency Number per box turnout BHA Bishopsworth South 1 1,205 183 15.19 BHB Bishopsworth South 2 1,604 233 14.53 BHC Bishopsworth South 3 2,163 346 16.00 BHD Bishopsworth South 4 2,438 206 8.45 BRA Bedminster South 5 1,378 288 20.90 BRB Bedminster South 6 2,049 562 27.43 BRC Bedminster South 7 2,203 685 31.09 BRD Bedminster South 8 1,669 318 19.05 BRE Bedminster South 9 1,482 356 24.02 FDA Filwood South 10 2,383 267 11.20 FDB Filwood South 11 661 125 18.91 FDC Filwood South 12 2,245 263 11.71 FDD Filwood South 13 2,184 277 12.68 HEA Hartcliffe South 14 2,507 428 17.07 HEB Hartcliffe South 15 2,465 212 8.60 HEC Hartcliffe South 16 2,340 180 7.69 HVA Hengrove South 17 2,388 338 14.15 HVB Hengrove South 18 1,837 282 15.35 HVC Hengrove South 19 1,242 159 12.80 HVD Hengrove South 20 2,149 363 16.89 KEA1 Knowle South 21 2,327 681 29.27 KEB Knowle South 22 2,061 686 33.28 KEC Knowle South 23 1,431 251 17.54 KED Knowle South 24 1,642 194 11.81 SEA Southville South 25 1,343 476 35.44 SEA Southville South 26 1,363 395 28.98 SEB Southville South 27 2,520 978 38.81 SEC Southville South 28 1,270 405 31.89 SEC Southville South 29 1,393 439 31.51 SED Southville South 30 996 174 17.47 WLA Windmill South 31 1,159 345 29.77 WLB Windmill South 32 2,090 602 28.80 WLC Windmill South 33 1,903 573 30.11 WLD Windmill South 34 1,350 487 36.07 WLE Windmill South 35 2,058 362 17.59 WPA Whitchurch Park South 36 2,172 230 10.59 WPB Whitchurch Park South 37 744 54 7.26 WPC Whitchurch Park South 38 1,180 142 12.03 WPD Whitchurch Park South 39 1,754 322 18.36 WPE Whitchurch Park South 40 1,302 283 21.74 EBA Brislington East East 41 601 165 27.45 EBB Brislington East East 42 2,262 363 16.05 EBC Brislington East East 43 2,491 447 17.94 EBD Brislington East East 44 2,407 449 18.65 EEA Eastville East 45 2,203 456 20.70 EEB Eastville East 46 2,302 586 25.46 EEC Eastville East 47 2,028 481 23.72 EED Eastville East 48 1,111 214 19.26 EGA St George East East 49 2,300 296 12.87 EGB St George East East 50 1,532 278 18.15 EGB St George East East 51 1,555 229 14.73 EGC St George East East 52 826 106 12.83 EGD St George East East 53 1,734 239 13.78 FVA Frome Vale East 54 1,502 328 21.84 FVB Frome Vale East 55 1,848 294 15.91 FVC Frome Vale East 56 1,771 366 20.67 FVD Frome Vale East 57 2,244 459 20.45 HSA Hillfields East 58 2,297 408 17.76 HSB Hillfields East 59 1,348 211 15.65 HSC Hillfields East 60 2,358 312 13.23 HSD Hillfields East 61 1,386 186 13.42 HSE Hillfields East 62 1,146 228 19.90 SWA Stockwood East 63 599 142 23.71 SWB Stockwood East 64 1,366 224 16.40 SWC Stockwood East 65 683 99 14.49 SWD Stockwood East 66 1,319 134 10.16 SWE Stockwood East 67 2,278 473 20.76 SWF Stockwood East 68 1,232 234 18.99 WBA Brislington West East 69 1,871 337 18.01 WBB Brislington West East 70 1,688 388 22.99 WBC Brislington West East 71 1,753 475 27.10 WBD Brislington West East 72 691 145 20.98 WBE Brislington West East 73 1,485 262 17.64 WGA St George West East 74 1,215 286 23.54 WGB St George West East 75 2,263 455 20.11 WGC St George West East 76 1,779 291 16.36 WGD St George West East 77 1,057 188 17.79 WGE St George West East 78 1,197 165 13.78 AHA Avonmouth North West 79 1,371 215 15.68 AHB Avonmouth North West 80 1,287 159 12.35 AHC Avonmouth North West 81 1,374 143 10.41 AHD Avonmouth North West 82 1,984 428 21.57 AHE Avonmouth North West 83 1,267 200 15.79 AHF Avonmouth North West 84 985 247 25.08 HDA Horfield North West 85 1,138 242 21.27 HDB Horfield North West 86 1,410 240 17.02 HDC Horfield North West 87 2,346 465 19.82 HDD Horfield North West 88 2,230 511 22.91 HDE Horfield North West 89 452 99 21.90 HDE1 Horfield North West 90 618 215 34.79 HYA Henbury North West 91 2,117 347 16.39 HYB Henbury North West 92 1,932 320 16.56 HYC Henbury North West 93 1,086 247 22.74 HYD Henbury North West 94 1,627 279 17.15 HZA Henleaze North West 95 2,033 892 43.88 HZB Henleaze North West 96 2,141 875 40.87 HZC Henleaze North West 97 2,391 1,032 43.16 KNA Kingsweston North West 98 1,488 202 13.58 KNB Kingsweston North West 99 1,561 185 11.85 KNC Kingsweston North West 100 1,945 537 27.61 KND Kingsweston North West 101 1,742 320 18.37 LZA Lockleaze North West 102 1,441 223 15.48 LZB Lockleaze North West 103 1,516 232 15.30 LZC Lockleaze North West 104 1,297 240 18.50 LZD Lockleaze North West 105 861 171 19.86 LZD1 Lockleaze North West 106 587 149 25.38 LZE Lockleaze North West 107 1,406 241 17.14 SBA Stoke Bishop North West 108 1,767 678 38.37 SBB Stoke Bishop North West 109 1,662 653 39.29 SBC Stoke Bishop North West 110 2,130 417 19.58 SBD Stoke Bishop North West 111 1,378 517 37.52 SOA Southmead North West 112 1,371 247 18.02 SOB Southmead North West 113 2,187 353 16.14 SOC Southmead North West 114 1,862 241 12.94 SOD Southmead North West 115 1,740 175 10.06 WTA Westbury on Trym North West 116 2,385 924 38.74 WTB Westbury on Trym North West 117 1,668 578 34.65 WTC Westbury on Trym North West 118 1,456 613 42.10 WTD Westbury on Trym North West 119 1,031 275 26.67 AYA Ashley West 120 2,245 837 37.28 AYB Ashley West 121 1,393 521 37.40 AYB Ashley West 122 1,382 353 25.54 AYC Ashley West 123 1,920 704 36.67 AYD Ashley West 124 1,840 449 24.40 AYE Ashley West 125 1,185 372 31.39 BSA Bishopston West 126 2,069 766 37.02 BSB Bishopston West 127 2,004 806 40.22 BSC Bishopston West 128 1,371 392 28.59 BSC Bishopston West 129 1,331 487 36.59 BSD Bishopston West 130 2,094 702 33.52 CEA Clifton East West 131 1,282 391 30.50 CEB Clifton East West 132 2,123 576 27.13 CEC Clifton East West 133 2,020 407 20.15 CED Clifton East West 134 2,189 496 22.66 CMA Cotham West 135 2,288 640 27.97 CMB Cotham West 136 1,916 557 29.07 CMC Cotham West 137 2,141 570 26.62 CMD Cotham West 138 2,180 611 28.03 CNA Clifton West 139 1,322 462 34.95 CNB Clifton West 140 1,708 550 32.20 CNC Clifton West 141 1,018 297 29.17 CND Clifton West 142 1,292 424 32.82 CNE Clifton West 143 2,480 720 29.03 CTA Cabot West 144 1,874 309 16.49 CTB Cabot West 145 1,937 590 30.46 CTC Cabot West 146 2,034 296 14.55 CTD Cabot West 147 2,555 476 18.63 CTE Cabot West 148 774 242 31.27 CTF Cabot West 149 443 186 41.99 CTG Cabot West 150 1,549 177 11.43 ENA Easton West 151 2,117 719 33.96 ENB Easton West 152 1,976 471 23.84 ENC Easton West 153 1,860 416 22.37 END Easton West 154 2,266 795 35.08 LHA Lawrence Hill West 155 2,482 703 28.32 LHB Lawrence Hill West 156 2,733 542 19.83 LHC Lawrence Hill West 157 383 82 21.41 LHD Lawrence Hill West 158 1,222 177 14.48 LHE Lawrence Hill West 159 1,832 456 24.89 LHF Lawrence Hill West 160 1,758 292 16.61 RDA Redland West 161 1,718 677 39.41 RDB Redland West 162 2,144 572 26.68 RDC Redland West 163 1,906 714 37.46 RDD Redland West 164 2,041 657 32.19.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Space in Horfield and Lockleaze
    Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 16/06/2010 13:58 Page 1 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:29 Page 2 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Horfield Lockleaze_new_text 09/06/2010 11:42 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page Gainsborough Square Park 8 1. Introduction 2 A city with good quality, Monks Park 9 2. Background 3 Horfield Common, including the Ardagh 10-11 attractive, enjoyable and Blake Road Open Space and 12 Rowlandson Gardens Open Space accessible green spaces which 3. Investment ideas and options to 7 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields 13 improve each open space within the area meet the diverse needs of all Dorian Road Playing Fields 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space in Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill
    Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • 1 Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 2 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_text 09/06/2010 11:18 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page A city with good quality, 1. Introduction 2 Riverside Park and Peel Street Green Space 9 Rawnsley Park 10-12 attractive, enjoyable and 2. Background 3 Mina Road Park 13 accessible green spaces which Hassell Drive Open Space 14-15 meet the diverse needs of all 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22
    SCHEDULE 1 Sites 1 – 226 below are those where nuisance behaviour that relates to the byelaws had been reported (2013). These are the original sites proposed to be covered by the byelaws in the earlier consultation 2013. 1 Albany Green Park, Lower Cheltenham Place, Ashley, Bristol 2 Allison Avenue Amenity Area, Allison Avenue, Brislington East, Bristol 3 Argyle Place Park, Argyle Place, Clifton, Bristol 4 Arnall Drive Open Space, Arnall Drive, Henbury, Bristol 5 Arnos Court Park, Bath Road, , Bristol 6 Ashley Street Park, Conduit Place, Ashley, Bristol 7 Ashton Court Estate, Clanage Road, , Bristol 8 Ashton Vale Playing Fields, Ashton Drive, Bedminster, Bristol 9 Avonmouth Park, Avonmouth Road, Avonmouth, Bristol 10 Badocks Wood, Doncaster Road, , Bristol 11 Barnard Park, Crow Lane, Henbury, Bristol 12 Barton Hill Road A/A, Barton Hill Road, Lawrence Hill, Bristol 13 Bedminster Common Open Space, Bishopsworth, Bristol 14 Begbrook Green Park, Frenchay Park Road, Frome Val e, Bristol 15 Blaise Castle Estate, Bristol 16 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields, Bonnington Walk, , Bristol 17 Bower Ashton Playing Field, Clanage Road, Southville, Bristol 18 Bradeston Grove & Sterncourt Road, Sterncourt Road, Frome Vale, Bristol 19 Brandon Hill Park, Charlotte Street, Cabot, Bristol 20 Bridgwater Road Amenity Area, Bridgwater Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol 21 Briery Leaze Road Open Space, Briery Leaze Road, Hengrove, Bristol 22 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (Central), Barrow Road, Bristol 23 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (East), New Station Way, , Bristol 24 Broadwalk
    [Show full text]
  • And Still Making a Difference
    Support Against Racist Incidents years And still making a difference Annual Report 2011-2012 Contentswith Current Trustees Esther Vikash ʻAs S.A.R.I. has Chairʼs Report: 3 got bigger it has got a good reputation of Directorʼs Report: 4 ʻWhen S.A.R.I. came making a difference.ʼ along my problems were Assistant Directorʼs Report: 5 over.ʼ Trustees: 6 Training: 7 Housing Association partners: 8 Richard Buba Education: 10 Ashfield YOI: 11 Discrimination: 12 21st Anniversary: 14 Vinodkumar Panna Bristol City Council: 17 South Gloucestershire Council: 18 ʻS.A.R.I. makes peoplesʼ lives North Somerset/ B&NES: 19 better.....and helps them realise that life Bristol Youth Offending Team: 20 is not that bad.ʼ Arlene Childʼs Play: 21 Consultancy: 22 ʻBefore S.A.R.I. came along people didnʼt know Avon & Somerset Constabulary: 23 what to do when racism was reported.ʼ Statistics: 24 Maya Area of Incident: 25 Finance Report: 26 Funders: 27 Irvin Kathryn Matthew Charity Number: 1047699 Company Number: 3060925 Chair’s Report Welcome to our Annual Report.This year S.A.R.I. reached a 21 year milestone. We had planned to celebrate this success but with the austerity measures that are affecting us all we decided to cancel this event. The cuts have deeply affected S.A.R.I. and our team are working creatively to maintain standards and meet targets. Examples are: • Beginning the task of changing S.A.R.I.’s charitable objectives to allow us to help all victims of Hate Crime. • Preparing for the submission of our application to be considered for the commissioning of the Hate Crime Services in Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol
    The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 Contents List of tables 4 List of figures 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction: what this report is about 8 2 Context: the debate about directly elected mayors in the UK 11 3 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project 15 4 Leadership in the community 21 5 Effective representation of the citizen 26 6 Legitimacy and accountability 31 7 Effectiveness in decision-making and implementation 34 8 Effective scrutiny of policy and performance 39 9 Responsiveness to local people 43 10 Strategic choices for urban governance in Bristol in 2025 45 Notes 50 Appendix 1: Survey research methods 51 Appendix 2: Socio-economic geography of Bristol 54 Appendix 3: Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 56 ward socio-economic category Appendix 4: Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 59 realm of leadership About the authors 61 Acknowledgements 62 3 List of tables 1 Bristol wards by socio-economic category 17 2 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 21 percent agree 3 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 23 percent agree 4 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 26 citizen, percent agree 5 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 28 citizen, percent agree,
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey Report on Individual Members Survey Consultation, Research and Intelligence Team May 2012 Page 1 of 21 | 1 | Contents Response Rates (including by postcode) 3 - 4 Services used (shown by Provider) 5 – 10 Frequency of use in last year 10 - 11 Quality of service provided 11 Reasons for use 12 Meeting travel needs 13 Importance of aspects of service provided 14 Reasons for not using 15 - 16 Other community transport used 17 Booking (including comment received) 17 - 18 Complaints and Improvements 18 – 19 Interest in Future participation 20 Equality analysis 21 Appendices A What other local travel needs do you have B Unable to use the service because of my impairment' ~ details C Reasons if ‘Difficult’ or ‘Very Difficult’ to book a journey D Specific locations that respondents most frequently use CT to travel to E Specific location in neighbouring authorities that respondents would regularly like to use CT to travel to F Other improvements respondents would like to see G Postcode Analysis of Community Transport Service Provider Membership at May 2012 Page 2 of 21 | 2 | Community Transport Individual Members Survey Note: Missing values are excluded from all tables Response Rate Questionnaire issued to the membership of the organisations listed below (Total=14,200). 2,322 questionnaires were returned giving response rate of 16.4%. Table 1. Response by Organisation Organisation Membership Number Response Returned Bristol Community Transport 274 266 97.1 (BCT) Bristol Dial a Ride (BDAR) 12542 1368 10.9 Mede Sprint 447 214 47.9 Catt Bus (HWCP) 478 345 72.2 Lawrence Weston Community 156 91 58.3 Transport (LWCT) St Philips Taxi Sharing 303 62 20.5 Scheme • Very high response for BCT • High response for HWCP • Approx 1in 2 response for Mede and LWCT • Low response for St Philips Taxi sharing scheme • Very low response for BDAR Issue of questionnaires coincided with a full review of Bristol Dial A ride Membership.
    [Show full text]
  • St George West Statistical Ward Profile 2021 May 2021
    St George West Statistical Ward Profile 2021 May 2021 Insight, Performance and Intelligence Service, Bristol City Council www.bristol.gov.uk/statistics - email: [email protected] CONTENTS - HELP PAGE These 2021 Ward Profiles have been compiled for Bristol City Council wards using latest data as of May 2021. This update publishes new data on quality of life, life expectancy, premature mortality, child poverty, crime and social care. Please note due to the impact of the Coronavirus (Covid-19) it has not been possible to update data for the Public Health National Child Measurement Programme and some education data. This interactive tool provides data for each of the wards and for Bristol overall, highlighting any significant differences for the relevant ward compared to the Bristol average. The tool is designed to allow users to copy pages into other reports, to provide local evidence. There is also a suite of individual Ward Profile reports. See www.bristol.gov.uk/wardprofiles . Contents Page 3 Population - ONS 2019 Page 19 Mapping Tools Page 4 Deprivation - 2019 Page 20 Sources (p1) Page 5 Quality of Life (p1) - 2020-21 Page 21 Sources (p2) Page 6 Quality of Life (p2) - 2020-21 Page 22 Ward Names Page 7 Healthy Lifestyles - 2020-21 Page 23 Ward Boundary Map Page 8 Life Expectancy - 2018-2020 Page 9 Premature Mortality - 2018-2020 Page 10 Child Poverty 2019-20 Page 11 Crime - 2020-21 Page 12 Education - 2019 & 2020 Page 13 Social Care 2021 Page 14 Housing - Census 2011 Page 15 Household Size - Census 2011 Page 16 Car Availability - Census 2011 Page 17 Ethnicity - Census 2011 Help / Notes 1/ The 34 Bristol Wards (established in 2016) are listed in blue down the left hand margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation
    Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation DRAFT REPORT v2.0 Consultation Research and Intelligence Team April 2013 1 CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology 2 Analysis 2 Response 2 - 5 Main Findings 6 - 25 SUMMARY 6 - 7 Do you feel you know what’s going on in your area? 8 Do you attend local meetings about local issues? 9 If you don’t attend local meetings about local issues, what stops you? 10 Heard of Your local Neighbourhood Partnership? 11 Heard of Neighbourhood Forums? 12 Taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum 13 Taken part in other local meetings 14 What like if : Participation in ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Taken part in other local meetings’ combined 15 What Like if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 16 How could be improved if: If attend Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum or Other Local meetings 17 How could be improved if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 18 Aware NP make decisions on highways etc 19 Do you think it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions 20 Do you think enough decisions about council services are made locally? 21 Would you like to be involved/continue to be involved in local decision-making? 22 How would you like to be involved in local decision-making? 23 What is the best time / day to have community meetings? 24 How do you find out information about your neighbourhood? 25 OPEN COMMENT ANALYSIS 'What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the future? 26 If you attend neighbourhood partnership / neighbourhood forums/local meetings, how do you think that forums and other local meetings could be made better? 27 Equalities Profile 28 Appendix A ACORN Profile of Respondents by NP area and Overal l Appendix B Equality Analysis on selected questions 2 Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Final Report Introduction The consultation was commissioned by the Neighbourhood Partnership Management Team and undertaken by BCC Research Consultation and Intelligence Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Step 1: What Is the Proposal? Please Explain Your Proposal in Plain English, Avoiding Acronyms and Jargon
    Bristol City Council Equality Impact Assessment Form – St Werburgh’s Primary School Input (Please refer to the Equality Impact Assessment guidance when completing this form) Name of proposal Draft Model Risk Assessment for Schools Re- Opening after Covid-19 Closure Directorate and Service Area People , Education Services Name of Lead Officer Christina Czarkowski Crouch Step 1: What is the proposal? Please explain your proposal in Plain English, avoiding acronyms and jargon. This section should explain how the proposal will impact service users, staff and/or the wider community. 1.1 What is the proposal? The model risk assessment for School Re-Opening, has been prepared to assist Schools negotiate the various Public Health England guidance in relation to the risks associated with the COVID 19 virus. The assessment has been prepared to help Schools instigate suitable control measures to help protect the School’s Staff / Pupils and Visitors. The risk assessment has been fully completed for the planned wider opening of St Werburgh’s Primary School to children in Reception, Year 1 and Year 6. The proposal is to open for small groups of pupils in Reception, Year 1 and Year 6 initially on a part time basis form Monday 8th June if the government and Bristol City Council advise that it is safe for us to do so. This will ensure that children can be in a familiar setting with familiar staff and come back into school in a phased way. Each group of children will operate as a ‘bubble’ which will not come into contact with or interact with other ‘bubbles’ of children.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014
    Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014 Total Working Age Older People population Children (0- (16-64 year (65 years and LSOA11 Code LSOA11 Name LSOA11 Local name Ward (all ages) 15 year olds) olds) over) E01014485 Bristol 023A Mina Road Ashley 1,831 353 1,310 168 E01014486 Bristol 023B St Agnes Ashley 2,397 456 1,812 129 E01014487 Bristol 020A Cromwell Road Ashley 2,012 270 1,632 110 E01014488 Bristol 023C Upper Montpelier Ashley 1,977 324 1,524 129 E01014489 Bristol 023D Lower Montpelier Ashley 2,482 341 2,027 114 E01014491 Bristol 020B Ashley Hill Ashley 2,003 408 1,488 107 E01033347 Bristol 023F St Pauls Portland Square Ashley 1,234 196 993 45 E01033348 Bristol 023G St Pauls City Road Ashley 1,135 227 889 19 E01033366 Bristol 023H St Pauls Grosvenor Road Ashley 1,592 590 918 84 E01014492 Bristol 008A Shirehampton Centre Avonmouth 1,575 269 967 339 E01014493 Bristol 008B Barrow Hill Avonmouth 1,473 299 953 221 E01014494 Bristol 008C Shirehampton Portway Avonmouth 1,508 243 979 286 E01014495 Bristol 008D Woodwell Road Avonmouth 1,663 278 1,031 354 E01014496 Bristol 008E Avonmouth Docks Avonmouth 1,688 377 1,142 169 E01014497 Bristol 003A Lawrence Weston West Avonmouth 1,567 366 972 229 E01014498 Bristol 003B Kingsweston Avenue Avonmouth 1,621 439 975 207 E01014499 Bristol 008F Avonmouth Village Avonmouth 1,635 332 1,055 248 E01014500 Bristol 039A Parson Street Bedminster 1,599 273 1,091 235 E01014501 Bristol
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol City Council Polling Districts
    Bristol City Council Polling districts AVONMOUTH A SOUTHMEAD A HENBURY D HENBURY C HENBURY A HENBURY B KINGSWESTON A SOUTHMEAD B SOUTHMEAD D KINGSWESTON B SOUTHMEAD C HORFIELD A WESTBURY ON TRYM A HORFIELD B AVONMOUTH C AVONMOUTH B KINGSWESTON C WESTBURY ON TRYM D LOCKLEAZE A WESTBURY ON TRYM B HORFIELD D HORFIELD C LOCKLEAZE B AVONMOUTH D FROME VALE A AVONMOUTH E FROME VALE C HENLEAZE A HORFIELD E HENLEAZE B STOKE LOCKLEAZE A KINGSWESTON D BISHOP A WESTBURY ON TRYM C AVONMOUTH F FROME VALE B BISHOPSTON D LOCKLEAZE C BISHOPSTON A EASTVILLE A FROME VALE D HENLEAZE C STOKE BISHOP B STOKE BISHOP C REDLAND A HILLFIELDS B BISHOPSTON B BISHOPSTON C EASTVILLE B LOCKLEAZE D HILLFIELDS A REDLAND B REDLAND C EASTVILLE C REDLAND D ASHLEY A HILLFIELDS C ASHLEY C STOKE BISHOP D COTHAM A HILLFIELDS E HILLFIELDS D CLIFTON EAST A ASHLEY B EASTVILLE D EASTON A COTHAM D COTHAM B COTHAM C CLIFTON EAST B ST GEORGE WEST D EASTON D EASTON B ASHLEY D LAWRENCE HILL A ASHLEY E ST GEORGE EAST D ST GEORGE WEST A CABOT B ST GEORGE WEST C CABOT C ST GEORGE EAST A CLIFTON A CLIFTON EAST C LAWRENCE HILL B CABOT A LAWRENCE HILL C ST GEORGE WEST B CLIFTON C EASTON C CLIFTON B LAWRENCE HILL E CABOT G ST GEORGE EAST B CABOT D ST GEORGE EAST C CLIFTON E CLIFTON D LAWRENCE HILL D BRISLINGTON EAST A LAWRENCE HILL F BRISLINGTON EAST B CABOT E CABOT F BRISLINGTON WEST A WINDMILL HILL A SOUTHVILLE A SOUTHVILLE B SOUTHVILLE C SOUTHVILLE D BRISLINGTON EAST C WINDMILL HILL C BRISLINGTON WEST C WINDMILL HILL D WINDMILL HILL B BRISLINGTON WEST B BEDMINSTER E BEDMINSTER C BRISLINGTON EAST D KNOWLE B BEDMINSTER B KNOWLE A BEDMINSTER A WINDMILL HILL E BEDMINSTER D FILWOOD B BRISLINGTON WEST D KNOWLE C FILWOOD A KNOWLE D BISHOPSWORTH B STOCKWOOD A BRISLINGTON WEST E BISHOPSWORTH A FILWOOD D STOCKWOOD C HENGROVE A FILWOOD C HARTCLIFFE A STOCKWOOD B STOCKWOOD E BISHOPSWORTH C HENGROVE C HENGROVE B STOCKWOOD D STOCKWOOD F HARTCLIFFE C BISHOPSWORTH D WHITCHURCH PARK B HARTCLIFFE B HENGROVE D WHITCHURCH PARK C WHITCHURCH PARK D WHITCHURCH PARK A WHITCHURCH PARK E.
    [Show full text]
  • Artists and Citizens: Sub -Report S on the Three Cities Deliverable 5.8 Month 18 Produced by Dr
    Artists and Citizens: Sub -Report s on the three cities Deliverable 5.8 Month 18 Produced by Dr. Daniel a Franca Joffe and Dr. Marine Schütz on the behalf of Work Package 5 This work forms part of the ECHOES project which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 770248 1 Table of contents Report on Bristol, Marine Schütz ……………………………………………………………………….…. p. 3. Report on Cape Town , Daniela Franca Joffe.…………………………………………….………….. p. 8 1. Report on Bristol, Marine Schütz ..………………………………………………………………………. p. 135 . 2 Report on Bristol, Marine Schütz Th is report , like the one on Marseille, consists in the presentation of the art projects recently made in the realm of colonial heritage by contemporary artists engaged in the memory - based practices . The analysis presented here are based on interviews that I had with six artist s based in Bristol – Michele Curtis, Valda Jackson, Stacy Olika , thanks to Dr Shawn Sobers , in July 2018 , and in Marseille – Badr El Hammami, Dalila Mahdjoub and Toufik Medjamia – between October 2018 and July 2019. This will be completed by other case stu dies based on interviews already produced and interviews with other artists in Bristol especially, as well as with association leaders. While contextualizing the projects within presentations that recall the debates on heritage in Britain or France, the report broaches the case studies in providing a raw archival material. The oral archives result from interview methods that are both semi -open and follow a recurring pattern where the contexts, motivations, perspectives on colonial history are each time recollected.
    [Show full text]