DOCSLIB.ORG

Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames A. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Alan Aburrow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 1: Retain houses fronting Eastfield Road and Southmead Road in Westbury/Henleaze Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Retain houses fronting Eastfield Road and Southmead Road in Westbury/Henleaze Comment text: The proposed boundary between Southmead and Westbury/Henleaze Wards should be repositioned at the REAR of the properties that front Eastfield Road and Southmead Road (at the highlighted location). This would allow these few properties to share the same Ward (Westbury/Henleaze) as the properties on the opposite sides of these sections of Road. I know it is easy to draw a boundary down the centre of a road but this unnecessarily splits communities for no other purpose than simplicity! Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4471 26/01/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Alan Aburrow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The Commission’s current proposals for the “new” Wards of Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze represent a poor attempt at trying to make the best of a bad job. This is admitted by the Commission in the details accompanying their proposals: “In formulating our draft recommendations we also considered joining this [Westbury] ward with Henleaze to form a three-member ward. On balance, we have taken the view that two separate wards provide an accurate reflection of community identity in this area. However, we would particularly welcome submissions on the Henleaze and Westbury-on-Trym areas”.The single most important flaw in the proposals is to annex Westbury village from the heart of the existing Westbury Ward into Henleaze and leave the rump in a Ward named “Westbury” that does not even contain the village of Westbury! This indicates a serious error of judgement on the part of the Boundary Commission in their attempt to balance the number of voters for each of Bristol’s 70 councillors. To arbitrarily assume that Falcondale Road is a natural Ward boundary shows a comprehensive lack of understanding by the Boundary Commission which completely ignores the historical development of the area. Falcondale Road is only the “Westbury Bypass” built in the 1920s and not a natural historical neighbourhood boundary at all. The alternative option (within the Commission’s many constraints) would be to retain Westbury with its village in a new Ward with 2 councillors and create a new Henleaze Ward with 1 councillor. However, this would probably be resisted by the residents of Henleaze and make it difficult to redraw the Westbury/Henleaze Ward boundary without creating the same “New Westbury” problem for “New Henleaze”. Therefore, on balance, the simplest option would be to combine the proposed Wards of Westbury (1 councillor) and Henleaze (2 councillors) into a Ward of 3 councillors, named “Westbury-on-Trym & Henleaze”.The new Ward should, for historical reasons, be named “Westbury-on-Trym & Henleaze” as Westbury’s history as a village stretches back to the 8th century (even pre-dating Bristol by some 200 years). By comparison, Henleaze is the “daughter” of Westbury that only came into being within the last 100 years, or so. Within Bristol, the precedent for not presenting the names of combined Wards in alphabetical order has been set with “Henbury & Brentry”, where Brentry is the much younger sibling of the village of Henbury. Alan Aburrow Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4546 02/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Rob Acton-Campbell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: n/a Feature Annotations 9: Area with path on north side of the river should be St George not Brislington. 10: Continuation of area 9 path should be in St George not Brislington Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: These houses are accessed from Malvern Road and should be in the same ward Annotation 3: Consider putting this area into St George Central to better equalise numbers between wards. This also seems a more natural boundary Annotation 4: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 5: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 6: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 7: This area of green space should be in the same ward as the houses in Meg Thatchers Green which is where the access is. Annotation 8: Remove the unecessary kink in the boundary so that all Troopers Hill Field (recreation ground) is in the same ward. Annotation 9: Area with path on north side of the river should be St George not Brislington. Annotation Continuation of area 9 path should be in St George not Brislington 10: Comment text: I am resident of St George and Chair of St George Neighbourhood Partnership. These are my personal comments and do not necessarily represent the view of the Partnership or any other organisation. a) I support the revised arrangement of wards in St George overall. The proposed St George Troopers Hill and St George West wards do seem to reflect communities better than the current St George East & West arrangement, in particular the Crews Hole area to the south has very little in common with the north east of St George. b) In principle I prefer single Councillor wards as I think they make it clear to the electors who their representative is and individual Councillors have a smaller area to focus on, it might also encourage more people to stand as independent Councillors if they have a smaller area to canvass. Given the Neighbourhood Partnership structure in Bristol Councillors in adjacent wards should be able to cover in the event of a Councillor being on long term sick or similar. On the other hand I can see that arbitrarily dividing a community is not sensible and so a mixture of 1, 2 and 3 Councillor wards can make sense. I would prefer though if there were more than just 4 single Councillor wards across so that they are seen as normal and not as exceptions. c) Areas of green space that are managed by the Council should be in the same ward as the properties adjacent to the entrances where possible so that residents do not have to deal with different Councillors for their street and their green space, I have marked on the map an area where the boundary needs changing to achieve this. d) Residential streets should not have ward boundaries running down them, the boundary should be along the back of the properties so https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4659 09/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 2 of 2 the whole street is in the same ward. New boundaries should certainly follow this principle and existing boundaries should be adjusted as part of the process unless there is very good reasons not to, again I have marked particular areas on the map. e) The River Avon east to Hanham is part of the City of Bristol, currently and in the proposals this is shown as part of Brislington. However, the towpath along the river which is maintained by the Council is on the St George side, this path (and the river) should therefore be part of the St George Troopers Hill Ward so that it is clear that its whole length is covered by the St George Councillor and St George Neighbourhood Partnership. With the current arrangement this strip of land is in effect a detached part of the Brislington Ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4659 09/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 2 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Rob Acton-Campbell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: n/a Feature Annotations 7: This area of green space should be in the same ward as the houses in Meg Thatchers Green which is where the access is. Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: These houses are accessed from Malvern Road and should be in the same ward Annotation 3: Consider putting this area into St George Central to better equalise numbers between wards. This also seems a more natural boundary Annotation 4: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 5: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 6: Move ward boundary so that both sides of residential road are in the same ward. Annotation 7: This area of green space should be in the same ward as the houses in Meg Thatchers Green which is where the access is. Annotation 8: Remove the unecessary kink in the boundary so that all Troopers Hill Field (recreation ground) is in the same ward. Annotation 9: Area with path on north side of the river should be St George not Brislington. Annotation Continuation of area 9 path should be in St George not Brislington 10: Comment text: I am resident of St George and Chair of St George Neighbourhood Partnership.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Green Space in Horfield and Lockleaze
    Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 16/06/2010 13:58 Page 1 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years Horfield Lockleaze_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:29 Page 2 Horfield and Lockleaze Draft Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Horfield Lockleaze_new_text 09/06/2010 11:42 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Horfield and Lockleaze Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page Gainsborough Square Park 8 1. Introduction 2 A city with good quality, Monks Park 9 2. Background 3 Horfield Common, including the Ardagh 10-11 attractive, enjoyable and Blake Road Open Space and 12 Rowlandson Gardens Open Space accessible green spaces which 3. Investment ideas and options to 7 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields 13 improve each open space within the area meet the diverse needs of all Dorian Road Playing Fields 14 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Turnout Mayoral
    Turnout by polling station Bristol Mayoral election November 2012 Bristol All All All 323,310 90,273 27.92 Postal Postal Citywide Postal 46,265 26,758 57.84 Eligible Polling Total Ballot Station votes Polling Polling Box Voters verified station District Ward Constituency Number per box turnout BHA Bishopsworth South 1 1,205 183 15.19 BHB Bishopsworth South 2 1,604 233 14.53 BHC Bishopsworth South 3 2,163 346 16.00 BHD Bishopsworth South 4 2,438 206 8.45 BRA Bedminster South 5 1,378 288 20.90 BRB Bedminster South 6 2,049 562 27.43 BRC Bedminster South 7 2,203 685 31.09 BRD Bedminster South 8 1,669 318 19.05 BRE Bedminster South 9 1,482 356 24.02 FDA Filwood South 10 2,383 267 11.20 FDB Filwood South 11 661 125 18.91 FDC Filwood South 12 2,245 263 11.71 FDD Filwood South 13 2,184 277 12.68 HEA Hartcliffe South 14 2,507 428 17.07 HEB Hartcliffe South 15 2,465 212 8.60 HEC Hartcliffe South 16 2,340 180 7.69 HVA Hengrove South 17 2,388 338 14.15 HVB Hengrove South 18 1,837 282 15.35 HVC Hengrove South 19 1,242 159 12.80 HVD Hengrove South 20 2,149 363 16.89 KEA1 Knowle South 21 2,327 681 29.27 KEB Knowle South 22 2,061 686 33.28 KEC Knowle South 23 1,431 251 17.54 KED Knowle South 24 1,642 194 11.81 SEA Southville South 25 1,343 476 35.44 SEA Southville South 26 1,363 395 28.98 SEB Southville South 27 2,520 978 38.81 SEC Southville South 28 1,270 405 31.89 SEC Southville South 29 1,393 439 31.51 SED Southville South 30 996 174 17.47 WLA Windmill South 31 1,159 345 29.77 WLB Windmill South 32 2,090 602 28.80 WLC Windmill South 33 1,903 573 30.11
    [Show full text]
  • Green Space in Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill
    Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan A spatial and investment plan for the next 20 years • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • 1 Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_Covers 09/06/2010 11:24 Page 2 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan If you would like this Vision for Green Space in informationBristol in a different format, for example, Braille, audio CD, large print, electronic disc, BSL Henbury & Southmead DVD or community Avonmouth & Kingsweston languages, please contact Horfield & Lockleaze us on 0117 922 3719 Henleaze, Westbury-on-Trym & Stoke Bishop Redland, Frome Vale, Cotham & Hillfields & Eastville Bishopston Ashley, Easton & Lawrence Hill St George East & West Cabot, Clifton & Clifton East Bedminster & Brislington Southville East & West Knowle, Filwood & Windmill Hill Hartcliffe, Hengrove & Stockwood Bishopsworth & Whitchurch Park N © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Bristol City Council. Licence No. 100023406 2008. 0 1km • raising quality • setting standards • providing variety • encouraging use • Ashley Easton Lawrence Hill AGSP_new_text 09/06/2010 11:18 Page 1 Ideas and Options Paper Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill Area Green Space Plan Contents Vision for Green Space in Bristol Section Page Park Page A city with good quality, 1. Introduction 2 Riverside Park and Peel Street Green Space 9 Rawnsley Park 10-12 attractive, enjoyable and 2. Background 3 Mina Road Park 13 accessible green spaces which Hassell Drive Open Space 14-15 meet the diverse needs of all 3.
    [Show full text]
  • NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEES TERMS of REFERENCE Version 13 Subject to the Mayors Delegation Decisions to Be Agreed at Full Council on 29Th June
    NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEES TERMS OF REFERENCE version 13 subject to the Mayors delegation decisions to be agreed at full Council on 29th June. 1. Overview 1.1 There is a Neighbourhood Partnership (NP) for each of the following 14 areas (each to be known as a “Neighbourhood”): Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston wards Henbury and Brentry, and Southmead wards Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze, and Stoke Bishop wards Horfield and Lockleaze wards Redland, Cotham and Bishopston and Ashley Down wards Frome Vale, Hillfields and Eastville wards Central, Clifton, Clifton Down, Clifton East Hotwells and Harbourside wards Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill wards St George Central, St George Troopers Hill and St George West wards Brislington East and Brislington West wards Bedminster and Southville wards Knowle, Filwood and Windmill Hill wards Hengrove and Whitchurch Park, and Stockwood wards Hartcliffe and Withywood, Bishopsworth wards 1.2 The councillors elected to serve the wards in a Neighbourhood are members of the corresponding NP, along with other individuals who live and work in the Neighbourhood (see NP terms of reference for more details). For the purposes of the council constitution, all of the councillors on a NP comprise a council committee known as a “Neighbourhood Committee” and have delegated power to take certain local decisions on behalf of the council.i 1.3 This committee of councillors sits within the Neighbourhood Partnership and is expected to take its decisions as part of a meeting of the NP. When taking decisions, the NP councillors should take into account the Neighbourhood Partnership plan and any relevant views expressed by other members of the Neighbourhood Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule 1 Updated Jan 22
    SCHEDULE 1 Sites 1 – 226 below are those where nuisance behaviour that relates to the byelaws had been reported (2013). These are the original sites proposed to be covered by the byelaws in the earlier consultation 2013. 1 Albany Green Park, Lower Cheltenham Place, Ashley, Bristol 2 Allison Avenue Amenity Area, Allison Avenue, Brislington East, Bristol 3 Argyle Place Park, Argyle Place, Clifton, Bristol 4 Arnall Drive Open Space, Arnall Drive, Henbury, Bristol 5 Arnos Court Park, Bath Road, , Bristol 6 Ashley Street Park, Conduit Place, Ashley, Bristol 7 Ashton Court Estate, Clanage Road, , Bristol 8 Ashton Vale Playing Fields, Ashton Drive, Bedminster, Bristol 9 Avonmouth Park, Avonmouth Road, Avonmouth, Bristol 10 Badocks Wood, Doncaster Road, , Bristol 11 Barnard Park, Crow Lane, Henbury, Bristol 12 Barton Hill Road A/A, Barton Hill Road, Lawrence Hill, Bristol 13 Bedminster Common Open Space, Bishopsworth, Bristol 14 Begbrook Green Park, Frenchay Park Road, Frome Val e, Bristol 15 Blaise Castle Estate, Bristol 16 Bonnington Walk Playing Fields, Bonnington Walk, , Bristol 17 Bower Ashton Playing Field, Clanage Road, Southville, Bristol 18 Bradeston Grove & Sterncourt Road, Sterncourt Road, Frome Vale, Bristol 19 Brandon Hill Park, Charlotte Street, Cabot, Bristol 20 Bridgwater Road Amenity Area, Bridgwater Road, Bishopsworth, Bristol 21 Briery Leaze Road Open Space, Briery Leaze Road, Hengrove, Bristol 22 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (Central), Barrow Road, Bristol 23 Bristol/Bath Cycle Path (East), New Station Way, , Bristol 24 Broadwalk
    [Show full text]
  • The Former Baltic Wharf Caravan Club Statement of Community Involvement
    The former Baltic Wharf Caravan Club Statement of Community Involvement For Goram Homes and Hill December 2020 1 Table of Contents 1. .............................................................. Executive Summary 3 2. ....................................................................... Policy Context 4 3 .................................................................. Consultation Plan 5 4 ................................................................ Stakeholders audit 6 5 ................................................................. Raising awareness 7 6 .......................................................Community Consultation 8 7 ............................................... Second round of consultation 9 8 ................................................................................ Feedback 9 8. .......................... How feedback has influenced the scheme 15 9. ............................................................................. Conclusion 15 2 1. Executive Summary Covid and social distancing has impacted the scheme but we’ve actually seen greater participation in the consultation process mainly due to it This document has been prepared by Cadence PR on behalf of Goram being easier and more convenient to access online. We recognise not all Homes and Hill in support of a Full Planning Application for the residential are online and the programme has included a community newsletter and development of 166 dwellings (open market and affordable) at Baltic alternative ways to get in touch to ensure all
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol
    The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project The Impacts of Mayoral Governance in Bristol Robin Hambleton and David Sweeting September 2015 Contents List of tables 4 List of figures 5 Executive summary 6 1 Introduction: what this report is about 8 2 Context: the debate about directly elected mayors in the UK 11 3 The Bristol Civic Leadership Project 15 4 Leadership in the community 21 5 Effective representation of the citizen 26 6 Legitimacy and accountability 31 7 Effectiveness in decision-making and implementation 34 8 Effective scrutiny of policy and performance 39 9 Responsiveness to local people 43 10 Strategic choices for urban governance in Bristol in 2025 45 Notes 50 Appendix 1: Survey research methods 51 Appendix 2: Socio-economic geography of Bristol 54 Appendix 3: Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 56 ward socio-economic category Appendix 4: Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, percent agree, by 59 realm of leadership About the authors 61 Acknowledgements 62 3 List of tables 1 Bristol wards by socio-economic category 17 2 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 21 percent agree 3 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, leadership in the community, 23 percent agree 4 Citizens’ Panel survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 26 citizen, percent agree 5 Civic Leaders’ survey, 2012 and 2014, effective representation of the 28 citizen, percent agree,
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey
    COMMUNITY TRANSPORT Individual Members Needs Survey Report Community Transport Services Needs Survey Report on Individual Members Survey Consultation, Research and Intelligence Team May 2012 Page 1 of 21 | 1 | Contents Response Rates (including by postcode) 3 - 4 Services used (shown by Provider) 5 – 10 Frequency of use in last year 10 - 11 Quality of service provided 11 Reasons for use 12 Meeting travel needs 13 Importance of aspects of service provided 14 Reasons for not using 15 - 16 Other community transport used 17 Booking (including comment received) 17 - 18 Complaints and Improvements 18 – 19 Interest in Future participation 20 Equality analysis 21 Appendices A What other local travel needs do you have B Unable to use the service because of my impairment' ~ details C Reasons if ‘Difficult’ or ‘Very Difficult’ to book a journey D Specific locations that respondents most frequently use CT to travel to E Specific location in neighbouring authorities that respondents would regularly like to use CT to travel to F Other improvements respondents would like to see G Postcode Analysis of Community Transport Service Provider Membership at May 2012 Page 2 of 21 | 2 | Community Transport Individual Members Survey Note: Missing values are excluded from all tables Response Rate Questionnaire issued to the membership of the organisations listed below (Total=14,200). 2,322 questionnaires were returned giving response rate of 16.4%. Table 1. Response by Organisation Organisation Membership Number Response Returned Bristol Community Transport 274 266 97.1 (BCT) Bristol Dial a Ride (BDAR) 12542 1368 10.9 Mede Sprint 447 214 47.9 Catt Bus (HWCP) 478 345 72.2 Lawrence Weston Community 156 91 58.3 Transport (LWCT) St Philips Taxi Sharing 303 62 20.5 Scheme • Very high response for BCT • High response for HWCP • Approx 1in 2 response for Mede and LWCT • Low response for St Philips Taxi sharing scheme • Very low response for BDAR Issue of questionnaires coincided with a full review of Bristol Dial A ride Membership.
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation
    Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation DRAFT REPORT v2.0 Consultation Research and Intelligence Team April 2013 1 CONTENTS Introduction 2 Methodology 2 Analysis 2 Response 2 - 5 Main Findings 6 - 25 SUMMARY 6 - 7 Do you feel you know what’s going on in your area? 8 Do you attend local meetings about local issues? 9 If you don’t attend local meetings about local issues, what stops you? 10 Heard of Your local Neighbourhood Partnership? 11 Heard of Neighbourhood Forums? 12 Taken part in Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum 13 Taken part in other local meetings 14 What like if : Participation in ‘Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum’ or ‘Taken part in other local meetings’ combined 15 What Like if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 16 How could be improved if: If attend Neighbourhood Partnership / Forum or Other Local meetings 17 How could be improved if: Attend ‘Meetings on Local issues’ only 18 Aware NP make decisions on highways etc 19 Do you think it is a good idea for local people to be involved in these decisions 20 Do you think enough decisions about council services are made locally? 21 Would you like to be involved/continue to be involved in local decision-making? 22 How would you like to be involved in local decision-making? 23 What is the best time / day to have community meetings? 24 How do you find out information about your neighbourhood? 25 OPEN COMMENT ANALYSIS 'What do you think should be decided or influenced locally in the future? 26 If you attend neighbourhood partnership / neighbourhood forums/local meetings, how do you think that forums and other local meetings could be made better? 27 Equalities Profile 28 Appendix A ACORN Profile of Respondents by NP area and Overal l Appendix B Equality Analysis on selected questions 2 Neighbourhood Partnership Consultation Final Report Introduction The consultation was commissioned by the Neighbourhood Partnership Management Team and undertaken by BCC Research Consultation and Intelligence Team.
    [Show full text]
  • Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014
    Mid-2013 Population Estimates by Lower Layer Super Output Area (LSOA11) Source: Small Area Population Estimates, Office for National Statistics © Crown Copyright 2014 Total Working Age Older People population Children (0- (16-64 year (65 years and LSOA11 Code LSOA11 Name LSOA11 Local name Ward (all ages) 15 year olds) olds) over) E01014485 Bristol 023A Mina Road Ashley 1,831 353 1,310 168 E01014486 Bristol 023B St Agnes Ashley 2,397 456 1,812 129 E01014487 Bristol 020A Cromwell Road Ashley 2,012 270 1,632 110 E01014488 Bristol 023C Upper Montpelier Ashley 1,977 324 1,524 129 E01014489 Bristol 023D Lower Montpelier Ashley 2,482 341 2,027 114 E01014491 Bristol 020B Ashley Hill Ashley 2,003 408 1,488 107 E01033347 Bristol 023F St Pauls Portland Square Ashley 1,234 196 993 45 E01033348 Bristol 023G St Pauls City Road Ashley 1,135 227 889 19 E01033366 Bristol 023H St Pauls Grosvenor Road Ashley 1,592 590 918 84 E01014492 Bristol 008A Shirehampton Centre Avonmouth 1,575 269 967 339 E01014493 Bristol 008B Barrow Hill Avonmouth 1,473 299 953 221 E01014494 Bristol 008C Shirehampton Portway Avonmouth 1,508 243 979 286 E01014495 Bristol 008D Woodwell Road Avonmouth 1,663 278 1,031 354 E01014496 Bristol 008E Avonmouth Docks Avonmouth 1,688 377 1,142 169 E01014497 Bristol 003A Lawrence Weston West Avonmouth 1,567 366 972 229 E01014498 Bristol 003B Kingsweston Avenue Avonmouth 1,621 439 975 207 E01014499 Bristol 008F Avonmouth Village Avonmouth 1,635 332 1,055 248 E01014500 Bristol 039A Parson Street Bedminster 1,599 273 1,091 235 E01014501 Bristol
    [Show full text]
  • Bristol City Council Polling Districts
    Bristol City Council Polling districts AVONMOUTH A SOUTHMEAD A HENBURY D HENBURY C HENBURY A HENBURY B KINGSWESTON A SOUTHMEAD B SOUTHMEAD D KINGSWESTON B SOUTHMEAD C HORFIELD A WESTBURY ON TRYM A HORFIELD B AVONMOUTH C AVONMOUTH B KINGSWESTON C WESTBURY ON TRYM D LOCKLEAZE A WESTBURY ON TRYM B HORFIELD D HORFIELD C LOCKLEAZE B AVONMOUTH D FROME VALE A AVONMOUTH E FROME VALE C HENLEAZE A HORFIELD E HENLEAZE B STOKE LOCKLEAZE A KINGSWESTON D BISHOP A WESTBURY ON TRYM C AVONMOUTH F FROME VALE B BISHOPSTON D LOCKLEAZE C BISHOPSTON A EASTVILLE A FROME VALE D HENLEAZE C STOKE BISHOP B STOKE BISHOP C REDLAND A HILLFIELDS B BISHOPSTON B BISHOPSTON C EASTVILLE B LOCKLEAZE D HILLFIELDS A REDLAND B REDLAND C EASTVILLE C REDLAND D ASHLEY A HILLFIELDS C ASHLEY C STOKE BISHOP D COTHAM A HILLFIELDS E HILLFIELDS D CLIFTON EAST A ASHLEY B EASTVILLE D EASTON A COTHAM D COTHAM B COTHAM C CLIFTON EAST B ST GEORGE WEST D EASTON D EASTON B ASHLEY D LAWRENCE HILL A ASHLEY E ST GEORGE EAST D ST GEORGE WEST A CABOT B ST GEORGE WEST C CABOT C ST GEORGE EAST A CLIFTON A CLIFTON EAST C LAWRENCE HILL B CABOT A LAWRENCE HILL C ST GEORGE WEST B CLIFTON C EASTON C CLIFTON B LAWRENCE HILL E CABOT G ST GEORGE EAST B CABOT D ST GEORGE EAST C CLIFTON E CLIFTON D LAWRENCE HILL D BRISLINGTON EAST A LAWRENCE HILL F BRISLINGTON EAST B CABOT E CABOT F BRISLINGTON WEST A WINDMILL HILL A SOUTHVILLE A SOUTHVILLE B SOUTHVILLE C SOUTHVILLE D BRISLINGTON EAST C WINDMILL HILL C BRISLINGTON WEST C WINDMILL HILL D WINDMILL HILL B BRISLINGTON WEST B BEDMINSTER E BEDMINSTER C BRISLINGTON EAST D KNOWLE B BEDMINSTER B KNOWLE A BEDMINSTER A WINDMILL HILL E BEDMINSTER D FILWOOD B BRISLINGTON WEST D KNOWLE C FILWOOD A KNOWLE D BISHOPSWORTH B STOCKWOOD A BRISLINGTON WEST E BISHOPSWORTH A FILWOOD D STOCKWOOD C HENGROVE A FILWOOD C HARTCLIFFE A STOCKWOOD B STOCKWOOD E BISHOPSWORTH C HENGROVE C HENGROVE B STOCKWOOD D STOCKWOOD F HARTCLIFFE C BISHOPSWORTH D WHITCHURCH PARK B HARTCLIFFE B HENGROVE D WHITCHURCH PARK C WHITCHURCH PARK D WHITCHURCH PARK A WHITCHURCH PARK E.
    [Show full text]
  • Post 16 Strategy
    better future Be inspired Improving 24 Bristol PostStrategy 16 2019 - Education, Skills and Career Pathways skilled world class post 16 education fulfil your life ambitions Better qualifed 1 Foreword Bristol is proud to be a UNESCO Learning benefit from more diverse and technical City and our Learning City Partnership education opportunities and apprenticeships, has a strong ambition to enable all from inspiring employer engagement, from young people to achieve their full improved careers information, advice and guidance, improved targeted support and a potential in learning, life and work. co-ordinated curriculum that is more linked to Many young people in Bristol are achieving the world of work. great education success and have a smooth The priorities outlined here can only be pathway into further and higher education achieved through world class partnership work that leads to great careers. However, too many – with active involvement of young people and young people from all parts of the city are their parents/carers, generous collaboration failing to meet their full potential; they are between education and training providers, and disengaging early or leaving education without increased contributions from local employers. a clear picture of their skills and the best fit and pathways into employment opportunities. City leaders and partners are now mobilising to move from planning to action to help us Leading post 16 providers have come transform the future for our next amazing together to change this situation. They have generation. We thank them in their help in the worked together by carrying out research challenge to make Bristol a more equal place to and developing a collaborative strategy with live and work.
    [Show full text]