DOCSLIB.ORG

The Former Baltic Wharf Caravan Club Statement of Community Involvement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Former Baltic Wharf Caravan Club Statement of Community Involvement The former Baltic Wharf Caravan Club Statement of Community Involvement For Goram Homes and Hill December 2020 1 Table of Contents 1. .............................................................. Executive Summary 3 2. ....................................................................... Policy Context 4 3 .................................................................. Consultation Plan 5 4 ................................................................ Stakeholders audit 6 5 ................................................................. Raising awareness 7 6 .......................................................Community Consultation 8 7 ............................................... Second round of consultation 9 8 ................................................................................ Feedback 9 8. .......................... How feedback has influenced the scheme 15 9. ............................................................................. Conclusion 15 2 1. Executive Summary Covid and social distancing has impacted the scheme but we’ve actually seen greater participation in the consultation process mainly due to it This document has been prepared by Cadence PR on behalf of Goram being easier and more convenient to access online. We recognise not all Homes and Hill in support of a Full Planning Application for the residential are online and the programme has included a community newsletter and development of 166 dwellings (open market and affordable) at Baltic alternative ways to get in touch to ensure all have access. Wharf Caravan Club Site, Cumberland Road, Bristol. Activity has included: stakeholder meetings, community newsletter (going The team recognise how sensitive development can be but also how out to nearly 3,000 residents), project website (visited by 699 people), important it is in the current housing and affordability crisis. Brown field, media coverage (in the Bristol Post), five interest group presentations and city centre locations like this are rare and making best use of the one public webinars, 150 calls and emails. opportunity, in an appropriate way, is crucial. Key areas of interest has been the: design and materials, height (from a Appropriate is very subjective and our approach has been to engage with local and neighbours perspective), parking, sustainability and ecology. the local and wider community to harness local views and test the emerging proposals. We’ve tried to be proactive, informative, responsive Key changes that have come from the feedback include: reducing the and considerate, combining the team’s technical expertise with local height, removing gables to improve light, increasing planting and knowledge to deliver a better, and we hope, more appropriate scheme. screening. This Statement of Community Involvement (SCI) summarises the activity, Feedback has been largely supportive of the principle, the open space, the community feedback received, how the team have responded to that ecology and climate change aspects. There have been concerns raised by feedback, and the key changes that have come from the consultation. neighbours around potential negative impacts, and questions around how the scheme would fit into the local context from the wider community. This consultation follows advice set out in Bristol City Council’s 2018 We have tried to address all points raised by the consultation. Statement of Community Involvement, as well as NPPF guidance and own professional experience. 3 2. Policy Context Goram and Hill recognises the importance on more effectively and efficiently with improved • Consider any responses before they finalise community involvement as part of the planning outcomes for the community. proposals and submit their applications. application process. • Account for how they have consulted the 16. Plans should be shaped by early, local community, what comments they The Government’s policy on community proportionate and effective engagement... have received and how they have taken involvement is set out in a number of statutory 39. Good quality preapplication discussion those comments into account. and non-statutory documents, including the enables better coordination between National Planning Policy Framework (2012, public and private resources and improved 2.3 Bristol City Council’s Statement of updated 2018), Planning Practice Guidance and outcomes for the community. Community Involvement (SCI) 2018. Localism Act (2011). In addition to national policy, 41. The more issues that can be resolved at Bristol City Council provides guidance on pre- pre-application stage, including the need to The SCI encourages applicants to undertake application consultation in its Statement of deliver improvements in infrastructure and consultation. The headline statement in the Community Involvement (2018). affordable housing, the greater the report is that: ‘The council’s aim is for the benefits... community to be able to shape and comment on 2.1 National Planning Policy Framework (2018) new development proposals and its planning 2.2 Localism Act (2011) policy documents. This reflects the council’s Sets out that the purpose of the planning system commitment to encourage every individual, is to help deliver sustainable development and in Provides the context within which the planning organisation, business and community to play an doing so it should be a collective enterprise. system currently operates. The Localism Act active role in the life of the city.’ (November 2011) sets out the Government’s The Framework specifically promotes pre- continuing intention of shifting power from BREEAM Communities technical manual, 2017 application engagement and the frontloading of central Government back into the hands of consultation. The purpose is to identify issues individuals, communities and councils. The aim is ensure the needs, ideas and knowledge that can be resolved at the pre- application stage, of the community are used to improve the quality thereby enabling the planning system to function Responsibility is placed on developers to: of stakeholder engagement, throughout the design, planning and construction process. 4 3 Consultation Plan The consultation plan aimed to: • To raise awareness, inform and involve the local community, encouraging feedback and improving understanding, both ways. • Be inclusive and provide various ways for people to get in touch. • Proactively involve interested parties including 1) councillors 2) direct neighbours, 3) the wider community 4) local groups and 5) local schools and GPs. • Discuss both the positives benefits and more contentious areas such as height or design. Independent facilitator Hill and Goram appointed Cadence PR to facilitate the consultation, a step away from themselves. Phases 1. Low level issues and opportunities consultation, August 2020 2. Public consultation on the emerging masterplan, September and October 2020 3. Revised scheme neighbour presentation, November 2020 4. Submission, December 2020. Community newsletter sent to nearly 3000 homes in the local area 5 4 Stakeholders audit Ahead of the consultation, a thorough stakeholder audit was carried out to help ensure key interest groups were informed. Their views and opinions helped the team gain a fuller understanding of the local area and respond to community-based issues and objectives. 1. Bristol City Council o Mark Wright, Lib Dem, Hotwells and Harbourside o Nicola Beech, Cabinet Member for Planning o Bristol City Council Planning Officers Goram Homes o Bristol City Council Planning Committee and Hill o Bristol City Council Political Party Representatives 2. Neighbours Planning Policy, o Residents (Baltic Wharf residents particularly) Statutory The o Businesses (The Cottage) Consultees & Development the Design Team o Users (All Aboard, sailing club…) Review Panel 3. Local stakeholder groups o Baltic Wharf – direct neighbour group, directors and managing agent o Hotwells and Clifton Wood Community Association o BS3 Planning Group Neighbours, o Destination Bristol stakeholders Technical o Bristol Tree Forum & the wider Study Findings 4. Design Community o Bristol Urban Design Forum o Bristol Civic Society The Housing 5. Local Media Market The main influencers 6 5 Raising awareness To publicise the proposals and consultation the following activity was carried out: • A newsletter was issued to nearly 3,000 homes in the area marked below • The consultation was promoted by the local media twice. Baltic Wharf Caravan site to have 'up to 190 new homes' (Bristol Post, Apr '20), The new homes coming to Baltic Wharf in Bristol (Bristol Post, Oct '20), and New apartments at Baltic Wharf in Bristol branded a 'monstrosity' (Bristol Post, Oct ’20) • Stakeholders were contacted and encouraged to circulate the information to their networks • It was promoted on both Facebook and Twitter 6. Summary of the community consultation 1. Pre-app Sept 2020 Meeting with Ward Councillor Design Review Panel Pre-app 2. First round of Consultation Oct 2020 Baltic Wharf Managing Agent Baltic Wharf Directors Website launched Destination Bristol Baltic Wharf Neighbours Hotwells and Clifton Wood Community Association BS3 Planning Group Public event Bristol Tree Forum 3. Second round of Consultation Nov 2020 Baltic Wharf residents Dec 2020 Harbourside Water users 7 6 Community Consultation The above newsletter was sent out to nearly 3,000 homes in the local area signposting people to the project website where they could find out more and register for a series of consultation events. Online
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEES TERMS of REFERENCE Version 13 Subject to the Mayors Delegation Decisions to Be Agreed at Full Council on 29Th June
    NEIGHBOURHOOD COMMITTEES TERMS OF REFERENCE version 13 subject to the Mayors delegation decisions to be agreed at full Council on 29th June. 1. Overview 1.1 There is a Neighbourhood Partnership (NP) for each of the following 14 areas (each to be known as a “Neighbourhood”): Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston wards Henbury and Brentry, and Southmead wards Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze, and Stoke Bishop wards Horfield and Lockleaze wards Redland, Cotham and Bishopston and Ashley Down wards Frome Vale, Hillfields and Eastville wards Central, Clifton, Clifton Down, Clifton East Hotwells and Harbourside wards Ashley, Easton and Lawrence Hill wards St George Central, St George Troopers Hill and St George West wards Brislington East and Brislington West wards Bedminster and Southville wards Knowle, Filwood and Windmill Hill wards Hengrove and Whitchurch Park, and Stockwood wards Hartcliffe and Withywood, Bishopsworth wards 1.2 The councillors elected to serve the wards in a Neighbourhood are members of the corresponding NP, along with other individuals who live and work in the Neighbourhood (see NP terms of reference for more details). For the purposes of the council constitution, all of the councillors on a NP comprise a council committee known as a “Neighbourhood Committee” and have delegated power to take certain local decisions on behalf of the council.i 1.3 This committee of councillors sits within the Neighbourhood Partnership and is expected to take its decisions as part of a meeting of the NP. When taking decisions, the NP councillors should take into account the Neighbourhood Partnership plan and any relevant views expressed by other members of the Neighbourhood Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Post 16 Strategy
    better future Be inspired Improving 24 Bristol PostStrategy 16 2019 - Education, Skills and Career Pathways skilled world class post 16 education fulfil your life ambitions Better qualifed 1 Foreword Bristol is proud to be a UNESCO Learning benefit from more diverse and technical City and our Learning City Partnership education opportunities and apprenticeships, has a strong ambition to enable all from inspiring employer engagement, from young people to achieve their full improved careers information, advice and guidance, improved targeted support and a potential in learning, life and work. co-ordinated curriculum that is more linked to Many young people in Bristol are achieving the world of work. great education success and have a smooth The priorities outlined here can only be pathway into further and higher education achieved through world class partnership work that leads to great careers. However, too many – with active involvement of young people and young people from all parts of the city are their parents/carers, generous collaboration failing to meet their full potential; they are between education and training providers, and disengaging early or leaving education without increased contributions from local employers. a clear picture of their skills and the best fit and pathways into employment opportunities. City leaders and partners are now mobilising to move from planning to action to help us Leading post 16 providers have come transform the future for our next amazing together to change this situation. They have generation. We thank them in their help in the worked together by carrying out research challenge to make Bristol a more equal place to and developing a collaborative strategy with live and work.
    [Show full text]
  • Road Ward(S) Allison Road Brislington East Ashley Down Road Bishopston & Ashley Down Ashley Hill B4052 Ashley Ashley Road B
    Road Ward(s) Allison Road Brislington East Ashley Down Road Bishopston & Ashley Down Ashley Hill B4052 Ashley Ashley Road B4051 Ashley Ashton Drive Ashton Drive - Bedminster Bishopsworth Road (20mph section) Bishopsworth Bonnington Walk Lockleaze Broad Walk Knowle Charlton Road, BS10 Henbury and Brentry, Southmead Charlton Road, BS15 Hillfields Cheltenham Road A38 Ashley, Cotham Church Road A420 St George West, Easton Clanage Road (20mph section) Bedminster Clifton Down Clifton Constable Road Lockleaze Stoke Bishop, Westbury-on-Trym and Coombe Lane Henleaze Cotham Brow Cotham Cotham Road Cotham Cranbrook Road Redland Crews Hole Road / Blackswarth Road St George Troopers Hill Daventry Road Knowle Doncaster Road Southmead Duckmoor Road Bedminster, Southville Eastfield Road Westbury-on-Trym, Southmead Easton Road Easton, Lawrence Hill Fishponds Road (Lodge Causeway to Cross Hands) Eastville, Frome Vale Fortfield Road Hengrove and Whitchurch Gloucester Road A38 Redland , Bishopston & Ashley Down Hallen Road Hallen Road - Henbury and Brentry Henshaw Road / Hillfields Henshaw Road / Hillfields - Hillfields High Street / Park Hill (Shirehampton) B4054 Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston Highridge Green Bishopsworth Hotwells Road Hotwells and Harbourside Jacobs Wells Road B4466 Hotwells and Harbourside, Clifton Westbury-on-Trym, Bishopston & Ashley Kellaway Avenue Down Kings Weston Lane (Kings Weston Road to Napier Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston Miles Road) St George Central, St George Troopers Kingsway Hill Ladies Miles Stoke Bishop Leinster Avenue
    [Show full text]
  • Hotwells and Cliftonwood Community Association – Newsletter April 2021
    Hotwells and Cliftonwood Community Association – Newsletter April 2021 Dear Friend Welcome to the Bulletin for April 2021. Easter has come and gone and so have the depths of lockdown – now we have something to look forward to. Spring is here and at least we can meet up with a few people out of doors – for those of us living alone this is a huge relief. Hope too now for our local businesses – many of them will now be able to open their facilities and welcome customers back to their bars and restaurants. May is the month of elections as everyone will be aware – details of meetings and Hustings in various forms can be found in the body of this newsletter. Enjoy the Spring !. HCCA Newsletter – April 2021 Page 1 of 18 Should you wish to raise any local issues/matters of interest, we can always be contacted at the following: [email protected] or leave a message on 01179 291 833 If there is anything you have written and would like to add to the next Bulletin – please send it to this email [email protected] HCCA Newsletter – April 2021 Page 2 of 18 In this issue: 1. Hustings Meetings .................................................................................................. 4 2. Ashton Sidings Clanage Road Proposed development changes ........................... 4 3. Traffic matters. Your chance to have a say in an improvement plan for Hotwell Road. .......................................................................................................................... 5 4. Cumberland Basin/Western Harbour. ..................................................................... 5 5. Piazza News .......................................................................................................... 6 6. Liveable Neighbourhoods comes to Hotwells & Harbourside ................................. 6 7. Well-being festival summer 2021- Anna ................................................................. 7 8. Follow up from FAQs – March Bulletin ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AREA CIL/S.106 COMMITTEES TERMS of REFERENCE
    AREA CIL/s.106 COMMITTEES TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. Overview 1.1 There is an Area CIL/s.106 Committee for each of the following 6 Areas (each to be known as an “Area Committee”): • Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston, Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze, Stoke Bishop, Clifton, Clifton Down, Hotwells and Harbourside (Area 1); • Henbury and Brentry, Southmead, Horfield, Bishopston and Ashley Down, Redland and Cotham (Area 2); • Lockleaze, Eastville, Frome Vale and Hillfields (Area 3); • Ashley, Central, Lawrence Hill, Easton, St George West, St George Central and St George Troopers Hill (Area 4); • Bedminster, Southville, Windmill Hill, Knowle, Brislington East and Brislington West (Area 5); • Bishopsworth, Hartcliffe and Withywood, Filwood, Hengrove and Whitchurch Park and Stockwood (Area 6). 1.2 Area Committees will make decisions about the local element of CIL monies raised within the Area and devolved s.106 monies. 1.3 The councillors elected to serve the wards in a neighbourhood are members of the corresponding Area Committee. For the purposes of the Council constitution, all of the councillors on an Area Committee comprise a Council committee with delegated power to take certain local decisions on behalf of the council. 1.4 The Area Committee is expected to take its decisions as part of a public meeting, following consultation with the community and networks within the community to agree local Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) priorities. 1.5 As a committee of council, Area Committees will be governed by the Committee Procedure Rules, subject to any amendments within these Terms of Reference. 2. Functions delegated to Area Committees 2.1 Decision-making in relation to devolved s.106 monies where there is a decision to made about in relation to what and where the monies should be spent (as opposed to when the funds have already been earmarked for a specific project as part of the agreement) and the expenditure of local CIL.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames C. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: J Camfield E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I think that it is very important for the historic centre of westbury on Trym village and westbury on Trym primary school remain in the westbury on Trym ward. I believe that westbury on Trym and Henleaze have similar issues so would be happy for the wards to merge as westbury on Trym and henleaze ward. I also think that Henleaze lake is an important part of Henleaze ward and should remain within. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4716 10/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Matthew Campbell E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: As someone who lives on and up to now has voted in the Windmill Hill Ward, I and many others have always regarded the housing north and south of Marksbury road to be one area together. I applaud the proposal to make the Bedminster boundary consistent with the railway line, which ic neat and logical, but feel that this leaves many voters who are south of both that line and Marksbury Road as now being within the Filwood ward, the main body of which is separated from them by the ridge of Novers Common.
    [Show full text]
  • Hotwells and Cliftonwood Community Association – Newsletter March 2020 Contents
    Hotwells and Cliftonwood Community Association – Newsletter March 2020 Welcome to this month’s newsletter for HCCA, sharing community news from Hotwells, Cliftonwood, Spike Island and wider Bristol. We hope that you find this material both interesting and informative and a diversion from the endless rain. Should you wish to send in a contribution, we would be very happy to hear from you. Please check our website for further information https://www.hotwellscliftonwood.org.uk/ Suggestions/queries should be sent to [email protected] Contents 1.Update on Cumberland basin/ Western Harbour ............................................................................... 2 2.Calling all local resident and equivalent groups .................................................................................. 2 3.Neighbourhood Forum News – opportunity to plant more trees! ...................................................... 3 4.Hotwells Panto ..................................................................................................................................... 3 5.Update to new bus stop in Hotwell Road ............................................................................................ 4 7.Dates for your diaries – future Hustings .............................................................................................. 4 8.Piazza News .......................................................................................................................................... 5 10.’Should Bristol become a High
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames M. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Amanda MacDonald E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: N/A - local resident Comment text: Boundaries need to make GEOGRAPHICAL as well as POLITICAL sense, and therefore it is utterly nonsensical to exclude the historic core of the ancient settlement of Westbury-on-Trym from its ward. You wouldn't exclude the heart of London from a ward named London for example. Therefore I suggest the North West part of the proposed ward of Henleaze is excluded from that ward and added to Westbury-on- Trym, which is where it should be, containing as it does the Westbury-on-Trym Parish Church and the War Memorial - the heart of Westbury-on- Trym village. I therefore suggest the following revised boundaries (I couldn't easily use the line drawing tool): The Henleaze boundary should run along Brecon Road from Westbury Road towards Grange Road. It should then travel south along Grange Road until it reaches East Field (note NOT Eastfield Road), where it should travel eastwards until it hits the Henleaze Road. It should then travel north until it hits the Southmead Road at the mini roundabout. The lump of proposed "Henleaze" land should be added to the Westbury-on-Trym ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4458 20/01/2015 Pascoe, Mark From: nicki Sent: 30 January 2015 11:24 To: Reviews@ Subject: proposed change of boundary Westbury on Trym, Bristol Dear Sir/ Madam, I wish to register my opposition to the proposed boundary change of Westbury on Trym Bristol.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Wellbeing in Bristol 2018
    Health and Wellbeing in Bristol 2018 Joint Strategic Needs Assessment (JSNA) 2018 data profile www.bristol.gov.uk/jsna Bristol, North Somerset and South Gloucestershire www.bristol.gov.uk Clinical/jsn Commissioninga Group JSNA 2018 data profile report Table of Contents Table of Contents 3.14 Deprivation headlines ...................... 39 Table of Contents ................................... 1 Children & Young People’s Health ........ 40 Summary points ...................................... 40 Foreword from the Co-chairs of the Bristol Health and Wellbeing Board .................. 3 4.1 Low birth weight ................................ 41 JSNA 2018 Executive Summary ............ 4 4.2 Infant mortality ................................... 42 Introduction ............................................. 4 4.3 Breastfeeding .................................... 43 JSNA 2018 Summary .............................. 4 4.4 Smoking during pregnancy ................ 44 Bristol JSNA 2018 - Summary data points 4.5 Disabled children ............................... 45 from each section............................... 7 4.6 Chronic Childhood Illnesses .............. 46 Map of Bristol wards and CCG sub-locality 4.7 Healthy Weight .................................. 48 areas .................................................. 14 4.8 Dental health ..................................... 50 Life Expectancy ...................................... 15 4.9 Childhood Immunisations .................. 51 Summary points ...................................... 15 4.10 Injuries
    [Show full text]
  • Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review
    Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames A. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Alan Aburrow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 1: Retain houses fronting Eastfield Road and Southmead Road in Westbury/Henleaze Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Retain houses fronting Eastfield Road and Southmead Road in Westbury/Henleaze Comment text: The proposed boundary between Southmead and Westbury/Henleaze Wards should be repositioned at the REAR of the properties that front Eastfield Road and Southmead Road (at the highlighted location). This would allow these few properties to share the same Ward (Westbury/Henleaze) as the properties on the opposite sides of these sections of Road. I know it is easy to draw a boundary down the centre of a road but this unnecessarily splits communities for no other purpose than simplicity! Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4471 26/01/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Alan Aburrow E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The Commission’s current proposals for the “new” Wards of Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze represent a poor attempt at trying to make the best of a bad job. This is admitted by the Commission in the details accompanying their proposals: “In formulating our draft recommendations we also considered joining this [Westbury] ward with Henleaze to form a three-member ward.
    [Show full text]
  • JSNA Health and Wellbeing Profile 2021/22
    JSNA Health and Wellbeing Profile 2021/22 Crime Summary points • The total recorded crime rate (all crimes) in Bristol for 2020/21 was 101 crimes per 1,000 of the population, significantly lower than the previous year. • 15.7% of Bristol residents said fear of crime affects their day-to-day life, the same as the previous year. All Crime Trend The total number of recorded crimes in Bristol in 2020/21 was 46,821, significantly lower than 2019/20 (53,270), likely as a result of lockdowns related to the pandemic (Figure 1). Violence against the person represented 33% of all recorded crimes in 2020/21 with 15,379 offences, followed by 7,545 ‘theft’ offences (16% of all crime) Figure 1: Number of all recorded crimes in Bristol. Source: Avon & and 7,267 ‘public order Somerset Police 2020/21. offences’ (15.5% of all crime). All Crime by ward The crime offence rate (all crimes) across Bristol for 2020/21 was 101 per 1,000 of the population. The all crime rate (per 1,000 population) within the wards (see Figure 2) ranged from; Westbury-on-Trym & Henleaze (43.9 per 1,000) and Redland (47.1 per 1,000) to Hotwells & Harbourside (190.7 per 1,000) and Central (234.8 per 1,000). In regard to actual numbers of all crimes by ward, they range from; St. George Troopers Hill (284) and Cotham (574) to Lawrence Hill (3,291) and Central (5,109). When comparing the percentage change from last year, 25 wards experienced decreases in crime whilst 9 experienced an increase.
    [Show full text]
  • 20-360 26 August 2020 by Email Dear Sir/Madam Thank You for Your
    Freedom of Information Request Ref: 20-360 26 August 2020 By Email Dear Sir/Madam Thank you for your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000. The Trust’s response is as follows: We can confirm that we do hold the information you are requesting. 1. Is it possible to know how many babies were born this past year? University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust: 4,952. Please note, the data covers the last 12 months (01/08/19 to 31/07/20) and excludes homebirths. 2. And then, for the Bristol-based mothers of these children, what % were from each of Bristol's 34 wards? 3. And also, what the average age of mothers of newborn babies was for each ward? Please see below response for questions 2 and 3. Avg Age (at Ward % by Ward delivery) Ashley 5.44% 32 Avonmouth and Lawrence Weston 1.01% 31 Bedminster 4.30% 34 Bishopston and Ashley Down 0.77% 36 Bishopsworth 3.93% 31 Brislington East 4.77% 31 Brislington West 5.11% 32 Central 3.02% 32 Clifton 2.39% 33 Clifton Down 2.05% 33 Cotham 2.65% 33 Easton 3.39% 30 Eastville 2.02% 31 Filwood 5.34% 30 Frome Vale 1.11% 34 Hartcliffe and Withywood 7.96% 28 Henbury and Brentry 0.47% 32 Hengrove and Whitchurch Park 6.18% 30 Hillfields 1.01% 33 Horfield 0.34% 33 Hotwells and Harbourside 1.41% 34 Knowle 5.38% 32 Lawrence Hill 7.93% 31 Lockleaze 0.60% 31 Redland 1.51% 35 Southmead 0.30% 28 Southville 4.03% 33 St George Central 1.55% 32 St George Troopers Hill 0.60% 31 St George West 1.24% 34 Stockwood 3.43% 30 Stoke Bishop 0.84% 32 Westbury-on-Trym and Henleaze 1.44% 34 Windmill Hill 6.45% 33 This concludes our response.
    [Show full text]