Local Resident Submissions to the Bristol City Council Electoral Review
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Local resident submissions to the Bristol City Council electoral review This PDF document contains local resident submissions with surnames S. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Catherine Saliveros E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Westbury-on-Trym To maintain our historical identity and preserve the integrity of the whole village of Westbury-on-Trym, I suggest the creation of a partnership ward with Henleaze, combining the two present wards into one and sharing three councillors between us. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4652 09/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Rodney Sampson E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing about the boundary changes proposed by your Commission for the Westbury-on-Trym ward in north Bristol. While appreciating that change is needed in order to maintain a balance in the ratio of voters to councillors across the wards of Bristol, I do not feel that the proposals of your Commission are suitable. Westbury-on-Trym is a historic village going back many centuries and with a continued strong sense of community. Accordingly, the suggestion that it should be split into two halves attached to different wards seems highly inappropriate. In response to the Commission’s proposal, a meeting was convened by the Westbury-on-Trym Society and the outcome of this was a new proposal whereby Westbury-on- Trym should form a new ward with the adjacent ward of Henleaze, and in place of the current four councillors the new ward would have just three. It may be added that this proposal has also received the approval of the committee of the Henleaze Society. Through the adoption by the Commission of this proposed merger, the present integrity of Westbury-on-Trym would be preserved and the desired overall reduction of one councillor would be duly and satisfactorily achieved. In the light of this, I would urge the Commission to reconsider its original proposal and to look with favour on the alternative which the Westbury-on-Trym Society has formulated together with its counterpart in Henleaze. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4698 09/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Christopher Sanders E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: The proposed new Westbury-on-Trym ward excludes the village centre. The centre would be transfered to the new Henlease ward. To retain the full identity of Westbury-on-Trym village I propose that the new Westbury-on-Trym ward and the new Henlease wards are combined (with three councillors). Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4537 02/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Ellen Sanders E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Feature Annotations 1: Westbury on Trym Village Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2013. Map Features: Annotation 1: Westbury on Trym Village Comment text: The proposed changes would put Westbury on Trym Village, the village church, the primary school, doctor's surgery etc as in Henleaze and not Westbury on Trym. The historic village would no longer remain. The proposed change is ridiculous. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4512 30/01/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Paul Sanders E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: We wish to register our disappointment that you are considering moving the village of Westbury on Trym for the Wot ward into the Henleaze ward. We appreciate the need to reduce wards in the area. To ensure that the historic village of Westbury on Trym ward remains within its boundaries, we would recommend reconsidering the boundary line, or as an alternative merging the Westbury on Trym award with the proposed Henleaze ward. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4839 16/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Richard Sargent E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I strongly oppose the plans to make the henleaze lake area part of the southmead ward. We feel part of the westbury and henleaze community and think this plan would adversely affect us and the surrounding neighbourhood and residents. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4818 16/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Graham Saunders E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I oppose the proposal to create a new Hotwells and harbourside ward. Hotwells and Cliftonwood form a strong local community. Pooles Wharf and Rownham Mead are part of this distinct community. Grouping them with part of Southville makes no sense from a community perspective. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4608 04/02/2015 Pascoe, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 10 February 2015 10:02 To: Pascoe, Mark Subject: FW: Henleaze Lake Area-----Bristol Ward Boundary Changes From: savage daniel Sent: 10 February 2015 09:53 To: Reviews@ Subject: Re: Henleaze Lake Area-----Bristol Ward Boundary Changes On 10 February 2015 at 09:45, savage daniel <[email protected]> wrote: I am writing to express our concerns regarding the proposed changes to the local ward boundaries. These are shared by our immediate neighbours who all live opposite the lake. 1. The Lake area has a much closer affinity with both Henleaze and Westbury than with Southmead which is much more to the North and West It would be inappropriate to allocate the area to the Southmead ward. Our preference would be to retain it in the Westbury ward, or allocate it to the Henleaze ward. 2. We bought our houses with particular addresses and post codes and have no wish to see these change. Your proposed changes will adversely affect the value of our houses. 3. Will the name of the Lake have to change if your proposals are adopted. Again this would be inappropriate and unnecessary. The much loved local facility has been known as Henleaze Lake for many years. We hope you will take these concerns on board which are shared by the wider community, before reaching any final decisions. Daniel and Christine Savage 1 Pascoe, Mark From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 10 February 2015 08:56 To: Pascoe, Mark Subject: FW: Proposed ward change in the henlaeaze aera From: christian schmitt [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 09 February 2015 13:05 To: Reviews@ Subject: Proposed ward change in the henlaeaze aera Dear Sir or Madam, I would like to let you know that I am not in favour of the new proposed ward changes in my area and would hope that you will take into account my opinion as much as so many of my neighbour in my street. Yours Sincerely christian schmitt 1 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: Anthony Searles E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: What is the purpose of this change.We have an established community here and I see no benefits by changing what is here. If you go ahead with this,what will happen with RPZ?I suggest that you will have to renegotiate the whole process again. I object. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4592 04/02/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: A Sherwood E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: I strongly believe the historic village of Westbury-on-Trym should be within the boundary of Westbury-on-Trym, rather than Henleaze. This would preserve the Villages' rightful name and keep the village together. I support the idea of a Partnership Ward with Henleaze, combining the two present wards into one and sharing three councillors. Uploaded Documents: None Uploaded https://consultation.lgbce.org.uk/node/print/informed-representation/4470 26/01/2015 Local Boundary Commission for England Consultation Portal Page 1 of 1 City of Bristol Personal Details: Name: ERIC SILLE E-mail: Postcode: Organisation Name: Comment text: Dear Sir/Madam, I wish to comment on the proposed boundary changes to the existing north east boundary of the Westbury-on-Trym ward in Bristol. Removing the historic village centre from the eponymous ward is unjustifiable. It appears that the historic churches, war memorial, public houses, post office and everything that gives Westbury-on- Trym its sense of identity will be moved to Henleaze ward. The main artery of Falcondale Road will no longer unite the ward by going through it but will become an artificial misplaced boundary dividing an established community. These local factors may not be relevant to the planners, who clearly place demographics above everything else, but the residents of Westbury-on-Trym baulk at this idea. Neither would I support any further attempts to tinker with population figures by excluding any other areas from the current ward in order to make numbers appear balanced on a spreadsheet. The residents of Westbury-on-Trym have a strong affinity with the locality and are unswerving in their support for the area and each other.