DOCSLIB.ORG

Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TR 86 Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Jones Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas 2002 Kansas County, Ness Fork, Pawnee on Village the at Archeology Historical Jones Ness County, Kansas National Park Service - Midwest Archeological Center Historical Archeology at the Village on Pawnee Fork, Ness County, Kansas By Bruce A. Jones Midwest Archeological Center Technical Report No. 86 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Midwest Archeological Center Lincoln, Nebraska 2002 This report has been reviewed against the cr iteria contained in 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1) and, upon recommenda tion of the Midwest Regional Office and the Midwest Archeological Center, has been classified as Available Making the report available meets the criteria of 43CFR Part 7, Subpart A, Section 7.18 (a) (1). Abstract Extensive inventory and excavation by avocational archeologist Earl Monger and two episodes of evaluative testing by Kansas State Historical Society archeologists in 1976 and 1977 have confirmed the location of the Cheyenne-Oglala village that was destroyed by the order of Major General Winfield S. Hancock in April 1867. Monger’s work and the Society investigations exposed several concentrations of burned and broken historic Euroamerican materials, together with some other artifacts that are clearly of American Indian manufacture. The artifact concentrations correlate with the piles of Indian belongings that Hancock’s troops collected and burned following the villagers’ flight from the military expedition. The archeological context of the artifactual materials matches well with the various historical descriptions of the village and its destruction. Historic trade goods or Indian annuity materials recovered during the excavations include tin cups of the Civil War era, a variety of buckles that probably represent harness or tack, firearms parts, helmet and uniform buttons, iron kettle and oven fragments, coffee mill parts, bottle glass and crockery, and sheet brass scraps. Artifacts of American Indian manufacture include chipped-stone projectile points, a stone maul, ochre deposits, and a buffalo stone—a baculite fossil that was modified into a bison fetish. No clear evidence of lodge structures was observed, although several small post molds were identified. i Acknowledgments When an archeological project takes more than 20 years to complete, it is important to acknowledge the many individuals who helped to see the project to its completion. Society Archeologist John Reynolds arranged for the 1979 loan of the Kansas State Historical Soci- ety artifacts from 14NS403 after I had left the Society to return to work for the National Park Service. Twenty years later, Society Archeologists Martin Stein and Virginia Wulfkuhle graciously assisted with the second loan of the Society’s artifacts, providing encouragement, useful advice, help with illustrations, and recommendations on the write-up. Former Society Laboratory Supervisor and good friend Verna Detrich, one of my original 1977 crew, patiently functioned as my conscience throughout the long history of the project. Long-lost crew member Marilyn Wyss magically appeared with critical references to what was probably the most important artifact that we recovered in 1977, but given her usual optimistic out- look, Marilyn probably didn’t even know that she was lost. Former Society Archeologist Don Rowlison reviewed the draft manuscript, as did Verna and Marilyn. Fort Larned National Historic Site Superintendent Steve Linderer and Interpreter George Elmore provided partial funding for completion of this report, and loaned the Monger Collection of artifacts, maps, and field notes generated by Earl's multiple episodes of work at the site. Dr. Leo Oliva, Chairman of the Fort Larned Old Guard, provided important corrections in his review of the draft manuscript. Midwest Archeological Center Manager Mark Lynott agreed to bear the remaining cost of analysis and report preparation. Midwest Archeological Center Archeologist Doug Scott lent his considerable ex- pertise in the identification of the Society and Monger artifactual materials and put his personal reference library at my disposal. Tom Frusher willingly provided an opportunity for Doug and Midwest Archeo- logical Center Archeologist Tom Thiessen to examine his personal artifact collection from the site. Both Doug and Tom also reviewed the draft manuscript. Finally, the discovery and study of the Indian village destroyed by the Hancock Expedition in 1867 was a personal labor of love for Earl Monger, a gifted avocational archeologist from Larned, Kansas, and his wife, Iris. Much of this report simply would not have been possible to write without the field notes and maps that the Mongers kept throughout their investigations. Bruce A. Jones June 19, 2002 ii Contents Abstract.......................................................................................................................................................... i Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................ ii List of Tables ................................................................................................................................................ v List of Figures............................................................................................................................................... v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Historical Background............................................................................................................................. 1 Project Background ................................................................................................................................. 7 Site Description ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Context and History of Research............................................................................................................. 9 The KSHS Excavations .............................................................................................................................. 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 11 Excavation Methodology ................................................................................................................. 11 Vertical Stratigraphy......................................................................................................................... 11 Area 761/771 ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Description ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Features ............................................................................................................................................ 12 Area 772 ................................................................................................................................................ 14 Description ....................................................................................................................................... 14 Features ............................................................................................................................................ 14 Material Culture.......................................................................................................................................... 15 Prehistoric and Protohistoric Artifacts................................................................................................... 15 Chipped Stone .................................................................................................................................. 15 Ground Stone ................................................................................................................................... 17 Ceramics........................................................................................................................................... 17 Daub ................................................................................................................................................. 17 Fire-Cracked Rock ........................................................................................................................... 17 Firearms and Weapons........................................................................................................................... 18 Bullets, Balls, Cartridges, and Cartridge Cases................................................................................ 18 Percussion Caps ............................................................................................................................... 19 Bar Lead........................................................................................................................................... 19 Firearms Parts..................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Current Archaeology in Kansas

    Current Archaeology in Kansas

    Current Archaeology in Kansas Number 3 2002 Contents Title and Author(s) Page Empty Quarter Archaeology — Donald J. Blakeslee and David T. Hughes 1 What Lies Beneath: Archeological Investigation of Two Deeply Buried Sites in the Whitewater River Basin — C. Tod Bevitt 5 Ongoing Investigations of the Plains Woodland in Central Kansas — Mark A. Latham 9 A High-Power Use-Wear Analysis of Stone Tools Recovered from 14DO417 — William E. Banks 14 Archaeological Investigation of the Scott Site House (14LV1082) Stranger Creek Valley, Northeastern Kansas, A Progress Report — Brad Logan 20 Kansas Archeology Training Program Field School, 2002 — Virginia A. Wulfkuhle 25 Spatial Variability in Central Plains Tradition Lodges — Donna C. Roper 27 Hit and Run: Preliminary Results of Phase III Test Excavations at 14HO308, a Stratified, Multicomponent, Late Prehistoric Site in Southwest Kansas — C. Tod Bevitt 35 Building a Regional Chronology for Southeast Kansas — H.C. Smith 39 Geoarchaeological Survey of Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge, Northwestern Kansas: Application of GIS Method — Brad Logan, William C. Johnson, and Joshua S. Campbell 44 An Update on the Museum of Anthropology — Mary J. Adair 50 Research Notes: Ceramic Sourcing Study Grant Received — Robert J. Hoard 51 Wallace County Research — Janice A. McLean 52 Another Pawnee Site in Kansas? — Donna C. Roper 53 1 2 Empty Quarter Archaeology Donald J. Blakeslee, Wichita State University David T. Hughes, Wichita State University covered most of the upper end. Furthermore, wind erosion has also created a zone around the When a small survey fails to reveal any lake in which it would be nearly impossible to archaeological sites, it is unusual for someone locate sites even if they were present.
  • The European Bronze Age Sword……………………………………………….21

    The European Bronze Age Sword……………………………………………….21

    48-JLS-0069 The Virtual Armory Interactive Qualifying Project Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by _____________________________ ____________________________ Patrick Feeney Jennifer Baulier _____________________________ Ian Fite February 18th 2013 Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng. Major Advisor Keywords: Higgins Armory, Arms and Armor, QR Code 1 Abstract This project explored the potential of QR technology to provide interactive experiences at museums. The team developed content for selected objects at the Higgins Armory Museum. QR codes installed next to these artifacts allow visitors to access a variety of minigames and fact pages using their mobile devices. Facts for the object are selected randomly from a pool, making the experience different each time the code is scanned, and the pool adapts based on artifacts visited, personalizing the experience. 2 Contents Contents........................................................................................................................... 3 Figures..............................................................................................................................6 Introduction ……………………………………………......................................................... 9 Double Edged Swords In Europe………………………………………………………...21 The European Bronze Age Sword……………………………………………….21 Ancient edged weapons prior to the Bronze Age………………………..21 Uses of European Bronze Age swords, general trends, and common innovations
  • Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911

    Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911

    Kansas State University Libraries New Prairie Press 2013 – Fort Riley, Kansas (Bonnie Lynn-Sherow, Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal Editor) Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911 James E. Sherow Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/sfh This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Sherow, James E. (2013). "Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911," Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal. https://newprairiepress.org/sfh/2013/folioII/5 To order hard copies of the Field Journals, go to shop.symphonyintheflinthills.org. The Field Journals are made possible in part with funding from the Fred C. and Mary R. Koch Foundation. This is brought to you for free and open access by the Conferences at New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Symphony in the Flint Hills Field Journal by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fort Riley and American Indians, 1853-1911 The lure of the Army’s newest post for Indian peoples was irresistible as the following three stories illustrate. In the first instance, a party of well-armed Indians spied a rural farmstead located not far from Fort Riley, and they advanced toward BUFFALO HUNT, CHASE George Catlin the cabin alarming the occupants. Linda Hall Library, Kansas City, Missouri On another day a larger party made its breaks formulaic depictions. way to the fort itself. They rode with an Consider the way in which the three air of confidence, armed and painted previous episodes concluded.
  • Weapon Group Feats for Pathfinder: Class: Weapon Group Proficiencies

    Weapon Group Feats for Pathfinder: Class: Weapon Group Proficiencies

    Weapon Group Feats for Pathfinder: Class: Weapon Group Proficiencies at 1st Level: Alchemist Basic weapons, Natural, Crossbows, any other 1 Barbarian Basic weapons, Natural, any other 4 Bard Basic weapons, Natural, any other 3 Cavalier Basic weapons, Natural, Spears, any other 3 Cleric Basic weapons, Natural, deity’s weapon group, any other 2(3 groups if not following a deity) Druid Basic weapons, Natural, druid weapons, any other 1 Fighter Basic weapons, Natural, any other 5 Gunslinger Basic weapons, Natural, firearms, any other 3 Monk Basic weapons, and all monk weapons Inquisitor Basic weapons, Natural, deity’s weapon group, Bows or Crossbows, any other 3 (4 groups if not following a deity) Magus Basic weapons, Natural, any other 4 Oracle Basic weapons, Natural, any other 1 (+3 if taking Skill at Arms) Paladin/Anti­Paladin Basic weapons, Natural, any other 4 Ranger Basic weapons, Natural, any other 4 Rogue Basic weapons, Natural, any other 3 Sorcerer Basic weapons, Natural, spears, crossbows , any other 1 Summoner Basic weapons, Natural, spears, crossbows , any other 1 Witch Basic weapons, Natural, spears, crossbows , any other 1 Wizard Basic weapons, Natural, spears, crossbows This system doesn’t change Racial Weapon Familiarity. Weapon Group Name: Weapons In Group: Axes bardiche, battleaxe, dwarven waraxe, greataxe, handaxe, heavy pick, hooked axe, knuckle axe, light pick, mattock, orc double axe, pata, and throwing axe Basic club, dagger, quarterstaff, and sling Blades, Heavy bastard sword, chakram, double chicken saber, double
  • Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C

    Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains Edited by George C

    Tri-Services Cultural Resources Research Center USACERL Special Report 97/2 December 1996 U.S. Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Construction Engineering Research Laboratory Archeological and Bioarcheological Resources of the Northern Plains edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort, with contributions by George C. Frison, Dennis L. Toom, Michael L. Gregg, John Williams, Laura L. Scheiber, George W. Gill, James C. Miller, Julie E. Francis, Robert C. Mainfort, David Schwab, L. Adrien Hannus, Peter Winham, David Walter, David Meyer, Paul R. Picha, and David G. Stanley A Volume in the Central and Northern Plains Archeological Overview Arkansas Archeological Survey Research Series No. 47 1996 Arkansas Archeological Survey Fayetteville, Arkansas 1996 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Archeological and bioarcheological resources of the Northern Plains/ edited by George C. Frison and Robert C. Mainfort; with contributions by George C. Frison [et al.] p. cm. — (Arkansas Archeological Survey research series; no. 47 (USACERL special report; 97/2) “A volume in the Central and Northern Plains archeological overview.” Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-56349-078-1 (alk. paper) 1. Indians of North America—Great Plains—Antiquities. 2. Indians of North America—Anthropometry—Great Plains. 3. Great Plains—Antiquities. I. Frison, George C. II. Mainfort, Robert C. III. Arkansas Archeological Survey. IV. Series. V. Series: USA-CERL special report: N-97/2. E78.G73A74 1996 96-44361 978’.01—dc21 CIP Abstract The 12,000 years of human occupation in the Northwestern Great Plains states of Montana, Wyoming, North Dakota, and South Dakota is reviewed here.
  • Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical

    Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical

    Chapter 3 Arapaho Ethnohistory and Historical Ethnography ______________________________________________________ 3.1 Introduction The Arapaho believe they were the first people created on earth. The Arapaho called themselves, the Hinanae'inan, "Our Own Kind of People.”1 After their creation, Arapaho tradition places them at the earth's center. The belief in the centrality of their location is no accident. Sociologically, the Arapaho occupied the geographical center among the five ethnic distinct tribal-nations that existed prior to the direct European contact.2 3.2 Culture History and Territory Similar to many other societies, the ethnic formation of the Arapaho on the Great Plains into a tribal-nation was a complex sociological process. The original homeland for the tribe, according to evidence, was the region of the Red River and the Saskatchewan River in settled horticultural communities. From this original homeland various Arapaho divisions gradually migrated southwest, adapting to living on the Great Plains.3 One of the sacred objects, symbolic of their life as horticulturalists, that they carried with them onto the Northern Plains is a stone resembling an ear of corn. According to their oral traditions, the Arapaho were composed originally of five distinct tribes. 4 Arapaho elders remember the Black Hills country, and claim that they once owned that region, before moving south and west into the heart of the Great Plains. By the early nineteenth century, the Arapaho positioned themselves geographically from the two forks of the Cheyenne River, west of the Black Hills southward to the eastern front 87 of the central Rocky Mountains at the headwaters of the Arkansas River.5 By 1806 the Arapaho formed an alliance with the Cheyenne to resist against further intrusion west by the Sioux beyond the Missouri River.
  • 2018NABI Teams.Pdf

    2018NABI Teams.Pdf

    TEAM NAME COACH TRIBE STATE TEAM NAME COACH TRIBE STATE 1 ALASKA (D1) S. Craft Unalakleet, Akiachak, Akiak, Qipnag, Savoonga, Iqurmiut AK 33 THREE NATIONS (D1) G. Tashquinth Tohono O'odham, Navajo, Gila River AZ 2 APACHE OUTKAST (D1) J. Andreas White Mountain Apache AZ 34 TRIBAL BOYZ (D1) A. Strom Colville, Mekah, Nez Perce, Quinault, Umatilla, Yakama WA 3 APACHES (D1) T. Antonio San Carlos Apache AZ 35 U-NATION (D1) J. Miller Omaha Tribe of Nebraska NE 4 AZ WARRIORS (D1) R. Johnston Hopi, Dine, Onk Akimel O'odham, Tohono O'odham AZ 36 YAQUI WARRIORS (D1) N. Gorosave Pascua Yaqui AZ Pima, Tohono O'odham, Navajo, White Mountain Apache, 5 BADNATIONZ (D1) K. Miller Sr. Prairie Band Potawatomi, Kickapoo, Yakama KS 1 21ST NATIVES (D2) R. Lyons AZ Chemehuevi, Hualapai 6 BIRD CITY (D1) M. Barney Navajo AZ 2 AK-CHIN (D2) T. Carlyle Ak-Chin AZ 7 BLUBIRD BALLERZ (D1) B. Whitehorse Navajo UT 3 AZ FUTURE (D2) T. Blackwater Akimel O'odham, Dine, Hopi AZ 8 CHAOS (D1) D. Kohlus Cheyenne River Sioux, Standing Rock Sioux SD 4 AZ OUTLAWS (D2) S. Amador Mohave, Navajo, Chemehuevi, Digueno AZ CHEYENNEARAPAHO 9 R. Island Cheyenne Arapaho Tribes Of Oklahoma OK 5 AZ SPARTANS (D2) G. Pete Navajo AZ (D1) 10 FLIGHT 701 (D1) B. Kroupa Arikara, Hidatsa, Sioux ND 6 DJ RAP SQUAD (D2) R. Paytiamo Navajo NM 11 FMD (D1) Gerald Doka Yavapai, Pima, CRIT AZ 7 FORT YUMA (D2) D. Taylor Quechan CA 12 FORT MOJAVE (D1) J. Rodriguez Jr. Fort Mojave, Chemehuevi, Colorado River Indian Tribes CA 8 GILA RIVER (D2) R.
  • Tribal and House District Boundaries

    Tribal and House District Boundaries

    ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribal Boundaries and Oklahoma House Boundaries ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 22 ! 18 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 13 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 20 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Cimarron ! ! ! ! 14 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 11 ! ! Texas ! ! Harper ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! n ! ! Beaver ! ! ! ! Ottawa ! ! ! ! Kay 9 o ! Woods ! ! ! ! Grant t ! 61 ! ! ! ! ! Nowata ! ! ! ! ! 37 ! ! ! g ! ! ! ! 7 ! 2 ! ! ! ! Alfalfa ! n ! ! ! ! ! 10 ! ! 27 i ! ! ! ! ! Craig ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! h ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 26 s ! ! Osage 25 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! a ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 16 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! W ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 21 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 58 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 38 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Tribes by House District ! 11 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 Absentee Shawnee* ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Woodward ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2 ! 36 ! Apache* ! ! ! 40 ! 17 ! ! ! 5 8 ! ! ! Rogers ! ! ! ! ! Garfield ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 40 ! ! ! ! ! 3 Noble ! ! ! Caddo* ! ! Major ! ! Delaware ! ! ! ! ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! Mayes ! ! Pawnee ! ! ! 19 ! ! 2 41 ! ! ! ! ! 9 ! 4 ! 74 ! ! ! Cherokee ! ! ! ! ! ! ! Ellis ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 41 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 72 ! ! ! ! ! 35 4 8 6 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 5 3 42 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 77
  • Early History of Junction City, Kansas : the First Generation

    Early History of Junction City, Kansas : the First Generation

    AN EARLY HISTORY OF JUNCTION CITY, KANSAS! THE FIRST GENERATION JOHN B. JEFFRIES B. A., Oklahoma State University, 1950 A MASTER'S THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF ARTS Department of History, Political Science and Philosophy KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 1963 i-V iu,i 7i j[,j TABLE OF CONTENTS C 2- Chapter Page Table of Contents ii Introduction _-----_----_-__-____ i I. Garden of Eden — — 7 II. The Founding of Junction City _ _ _ _ _ 20 III. Transportation — --- — . _ 39 IV. Communications ------------------- 77 Mail Service 77 Newspapers -------------------- 81 Telegraph __________ — — __ — _ 89 V. Government ---------------______ 90 County ---------------_______ 90 Census ---------------------- 97 U. S. Land Office 100 Politics 102 City 104 Streets and sidewalks -- _______ 107 Licensing of Saloons --------------- 108 Stray Livestock - _____ ___ _. 109 Law and Order _---------_------_ no Fire Protection 117 Finances ___ __ _ 121 City Additions _ 123 Home Guard and Militia --_ 123 U. S. Military Forces 125 ili VI. Commerce, Industry, and Agriculture - _-_ - 129 Commerce ---------------------- 130 Industry ------- — — ----- 142 Agriculture ____ — — 151 VII. Cultural and Social Growth 166 Religious Organizations --------------- 166 Episcopal Church 167 Union Church ------------------- 166 Methodist Church 169 Baptist Church 170 Presbyterian Church ---------------- 170 Catholic Church 172 Cemetery -------- — _________ — _ 172 Fraternal Organizations _-_-------_-_-- 173 Social Organizations — - — -- — -- — 176 Cultural Organizations -___ ig_ Education ---------------------- 182 Conclusion -----------------_____ 192 Bibliography - — 199 Appendix A, Firms advertising in 1860 - -- 211 Appendix B, Firms Advertising in 1870 213 Appendix C, Firms Advertising in 1880 215 INTRODUCTION The history of Junction City, Kansas, is more than merely that of an Army town, although the Junction City-Fort Riley connection has existed from the days of the first settlers.
  • Plains Anthropologist Author Index

    Plains Anthropologist Author Index

    Author Index AUTHOR INDEX Aaberg, Stephen A. (see Shelley, Phillip H. and George A. Agogino) 1983 Plant Gathering as a Settlement Determinant at the Pilgrim Stone Circle Site. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. (see Smith, Calvin, John Runyon, and George A. Agogino) 102, pp. 279-303. (see Smith, Shirley and George A. Agogino) Abbott, James T. Agogino, George A. and Al Parrish 1988 A Re-Evaluation of Boulderflow as a Relative Dating 1971 The Fowler-Parrish Site: A Folsom Campsite in Eastern Technique for Surficial Boulder Features. Vol. 33, No. Colorado. Vol. 16, No. 52, pp. 111-114. 119, pp. 113-118. Agogino, George A. and Eugene Galloway Abbott, Jane P. 1963 Osteology of the Four Bear Burials. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. (see Martin, James E., Robert A. Alex, Lynn M. Alex, Jane P. 57-60. Abbott, Rachel C. Benton, and Louise F. Miller) 1965 The Sister’s Hill Site: A Hell Gap Site in North-Central Adams, Gary Wyoming. Vol. 10, No. 29, pp. 190-195. 1983 Tipi Rings at York Factory: An Archaeological- Ethnographic Interface. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. Agogino, George A. and Sally K. Sachs 102, pp. 7-15. 1960 Criticism of the Museum Orientation of Existing Antiquity Laws. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 31-35. Adovasio, James M. (see Frison, George C., James M. Adovasio, and Ronald C. Agogino, George A. and William Sweetland Carlisle) 1985 The Stolle Mammoth: A Possible Clovis Kill-Site. Vol. 30, No. 107, pp. 73-76. Adovasio, James M., R. L. Andrews, and C. S. Fowler 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont Agogino, George A., David K.
  • A Soldier and His Many Hats: the Evolution of American Military Headgear

    A Soldier and His Many Hats: the Evolution of American Military Headgear

    The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of Civil War Institute History 12-5-2016 A Soldier and His Many Hats: The volutE ion of American Military Headgear Jonathan E. Tracey Gettysburg College Follow this and additional works at: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler Part of the Military History Commons, Public History Commons, and the United States History Commons Share feedback about the accessibility of this item. Tracey, Jonathan E., "A Soldier and His Many Hats: The vE olution of American Military Headgear" (2016). The Gettysburg Compiler: On the Front Lines of History. 185. https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/185 This is the author's version of the work. This publication appears in Gettysburg College's institutional repository by permission of the copyright owner for personal use, not for redistribution. Cupola permanent link: https://cupola.gettysburg.edu/compiler/185 This open access blog post is brought to you by The uC pola: Scholarship at Gettysburg College. It has been accepted for inclusion by an authorized administrator of The uC pola. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Soldier and His Many Hats: The volutE ion of American Military Headgear Abstract Military headgear is a fascinating topic. It exists on a spectrum from the gaudy to the protective, but how did headgear evolve with the military? Interestingly, changes from the decorative to the practical can be examined through this blog’s favorite topic, the 1800s and the American Civil War. By tracing key changes in American military headgear in the 1800s, ideas about the nature of war, as well as how the United States was distancing itself from Europe, become clear.
  • Pattern Recognition and Feature Extraction Using Lidar-Derived

    Pattern Recognition and Feature Extraction Using Lidar-Derived

    PATTERN RECOGNITION AND FEATURE EXTRACTION USING LIDAR-DERIVED ELEVATION MODELS IN GIS: A COMPARISON BETWEEN VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUES AND AUTOMATED METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING PREHISTORIC DITCH-FORTIFIED SITES IN NORTH DAKOTA A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Matthew Jeffery Radermacher In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Sociology and Anthropology October 2016 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title Pattern recognition and feature extraction using lidar-derived elevation models in GIS: a comparison between visualization techniques and automated methods for identifying prehistoric ditch-fortified village sites in North Dakota By Matthew J. Radermacher The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Jeffrey T. Clark Chair Thomas Riley Stephanie Day Michael Michlovic Approved: 10/11/2016 Jeffrey Bumgarner Date Department Chair ABSTRACT As technologies advance in the fields of geology and computer science, new methods in remote sensing, including data acquisition and analyses, make it possible to accurately model diverse landscapes. Archaeological applications of these systems are becoming increasingly popular, especially in regards to site prospection and the geospatial analysis of cultural features. Different methodologies were used to identify fortified ditch features of anthropogenic origin using aerial lidar from known prehistoric sites in North Dakota. The results were compared in an attempt to develop a system aimed at detecting similar, unrecorded morphological features on the landscape. The successful development of this program will allow archaeological investigators to review topography and locate specific features on the surface that otherwise could be difficult to identify as a result of poor visibility in the field.