19312 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS STILL MORE INFORMATION OF fighters o1f Hokkaido on October 7, 1952 and which came down 1n the Baltic Sea area on AMERICAN AIRMEN POSSmLY the B-50 destroyed by Soviet fighters over April 8, 1960. The Govenunent HELD IN U.S.S.R.! the Sea of Japan on J.uly 29, 1953. This De­ has since that time received reports that partment, however, made ·to specl.f1c inquiry various members o! the crew of this Unl ted with respect to the detention of survivors of States aircraft were, and are, detained in HON. LARRY McDONALD the United States Na'Vy Privateer shot down Soviet detention places in the Far Eastern by Soviet fighters over the Baltic Sea on area of the . In particular, it 1e OJ' AprU 8, 1950, nor with respect to the B-29 informed, and believes, that in 1950 and in IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES missing over the area of the Sea of Japan October, 1953 at least one American mmtary Wednesday, June 15, 1977 on June 13, 1952; nor has it made specific aviation person, belleved to be a member of representations with respect to the reported the crew of this Privateer, Mr. McDONALD. Mr. Speaker, in detention of United States aviation person­ was held 8lt Camp No. 20 allegedly near Tai­ 1975, on two previous occasions I in­ nel who may have come into Soviet custody shet, and Collective Farm No. 25, approxi­ serted in the during the Korean hostillties. There have mately 54 kilometers from Taishet, said to be items on the missing crewmen of a U.S. been reports mentioned in the communica­ under sentence for alleged espionage. This tions under reference, from Amarican, Jap­ American national was described as having plane shot down by the Soviet Union in anese and other sources indicating specif­ the Baltic in 1950. These two items are suffered burns on the !ace and legs in the ically the detention of American aviation crash o! his aircraft and using crutches or found on pages 34535-34536 of the personnel since 1949 and the possibtlity that a cane. October 30, 1975 REcoRD and on page among them are included crew members of Reports have been received from former 35011 of the November 4, 1975 CoN­ such lost or destroyed aircraft. The Embassies prisoners ot the Soviet Government at Vor­ GRESSIONAL RECORD. At numerous times are, of course, aware of the widely publicized kuta th81t in September, 1950 as many as allegations of the repatriate, Jolin Noble, eight American nationals, believed to be information has come out of the U.S.S.R. which have been corroborated in part by from persons who were in the forced other repatriates, concerning the Navy Prl· members of the crew of the United States labor camps that these and other Ameri­ vateer crew. It is believed that the informa­ Navy Privateer to which reference 1s made, cans were still being held in the U.S.S.R. tion may be specific enough to justify a de­ had been seen ln the Area of Vorkuta and In support of this thesis I recently was parture from the existing practice o! identi­ specifically, that one person who was in­ given the declassified text of a State fying by name individual survivors held in terned at Vorkuta in September, 1950 stated Department message dated June 20, detention; and publicity to the request may that he was serving a twenty-five year es­ encourage other repatriates to come forward pionage sentence and had been a member of 1956 sent to M;oscow and Tokyo for a down United. States aircraft. comment as to how best to approach the with information. Moscow's and Tokyo's comments are re­ For the information o! the Soviet Govern­ Soviet Government relative to the :fliers quested o:r;t the general des1rab111ty of such ment, the crew of the United States Navy from the 1950 incident in the Baltic, as action and particularly on the following pro­ Privateer when it departed for its flight over well as the B-50 plane destroyed by posed note. the high seas of the Baltic consisted o! the Soviet fighters oft' Hokkaido in 1952, VERBATIM TEXT following United States Navy personnel, all nationals o! the United States: since there were indications of survivors The Embassy of the United States of Amer­ in both cases. ica presents its compliments to the Minis­ NAME, RANK AND SERIAL NUMBER Navy and CIA messages recently de­ try of Foreign A1fairs of the Union of Soviet Fette. John H., Lt., 320676 USNR. classified also bolster the case that these Socialist Republics and has the honor to re­ Seescha.!, Ho~ard W., Lt., 264095 USN. men were prisoners. Since these ar..d fer to the question of the detention of United. Reynolds, Robert D., Lt. jg, 368573 USN. other Americans have never been ac­ States military personnel in the Soviet Union. Burgess, Tommy L., Ens., 506762 USN. counted for by the Soviet Union, it seems The United States Governmelllt haa for some Danens Jr., Joe H., AD1, 3685438 USN. to me that we ought to continue to ask time received, from persons of various na­ Thomas, Jack W .• ADl, 2242750 USN. tionalities freed from Soviet Government Beckman, FrankL., ATl, 2799076 USN. and that the Soviets be required to Purcell, Edward J., CT3, 2540438 USN. render a full accounting of these in­ imprisonment during the last several years, reports that they have conversed with, seen Rinnlar Jr., Joseph Norris, AT3, 2542600 cidents, because obviously some of these USN. or heard reports concerning United states Bourassa, Joseph Jay, ALS, 9539864 USN. men were prisoners at one time. It is my m111tary aviation personnel, belonging either intention to contact the Department of to the United States Air Force or to the 2. One or more members of the crew of a State to ask what followup measures United States Navy Air Arm, in actual deten­ United States Air Force B-29 which came were taken and with what results. tion in the Soviet Union. Th& United States down on June 13, 1952, either over the Sea of Japan or near the Kamchatka area of the Whether they are alive now is diftlcult has Government sought in all such cases to Soviet Union. An omcer, believed by the to say but detente notwithstanding, we obtain, 1f possible, precise identlfleation of United States Government to have been a owe it to their families. The text of the American nationals detained by the Soviet member of this crew, was observed in Octo­ State Department message follows: Government, although it notes that by inter­ ber, 1953 in a Soviet hospital north of Maga­ national law and international practice the dan near the crossing o! the Kolyma River [Department of State Instruction, CA-101155, Soviet GovM'nment 1s obliged to inform the June 20, 1956) between Elgen and Debin at a nlace called United States Government first of any Amer­ Narionburg. Th1s officer stated that he had SOVIET DETENTION OF UNITED STATES AmCRAFT ican nationals whom the Soviet Government been convicted, wrongfully, under Item 6 of INCmENT SURVIVORS holds in custody or to permit such nationals Article 58 of the Soviet Penal Code. To: The American Embassy, Moscow. Ameri- to communicate wt.th the proper United For the information of the Soviet Govern­ can Embassy, Tokyo. · States authorities. The reports concerntng ment, the United States Air Force personnel Reference 1s made to the Department's such personnel have now become so persts­ on board the B-29 which has been missing Airgram A-785 of Apr1116, 1954 to the Amer­ tent and detailed, and so credible, that, al­ sines June 13, 1952 were as follows: ican Embassy, Tokyo on the subject "Aircraft though the United States Government 1s not NAME, RANK AND SERIAL NU114BER Incidents-Survivors" and related telegraphic able to identify by name these American na­ Busch, Samuel N .• Major, AO 733811. correspondence, including Section 2 o! Mos­ tionals now detained by the Soviet Govern­ Sculley, James A., 1st Lt., AO 693414. cow's Telegram to the Department No. 944 ment, it requests the Soviet Government to Service, Samuel D., 1st Lt., AO 752509. of February 1, 1954, final paragraph. inform the United States Government in McDonnell, Robert J., 1st Lt., AO 2222264. The Department is considering whether it detail concerning each American mwtary Homer, wuuam B., M/Sgt., AF 7025704. has become appropriate as well as desirable person who has been detained in the Soviet Moore, David L., M/Sgt., AP 15229915. at this time to question the Soviet Govern­ Union at any time since January 1, 1949 of BUzzard, Wllliam A., S/Sgt., AP 19244175. ment specifically with reference to the de­ whom the United States Government haa not Monserrat, Miguel W., S/Sgt., AF 13164064. tention of American filers whose presence heretofore been informed by the Soviet Gov­ Berg, Eddie R., S/Sgt., !J' 17281746. has been reported by repatriates from Soviet ernment, giving in each case the name of the Bonura, Leon P., S/Sgt., AP 18359162. prison camps and detention places, even person :-.nd the circumstances underlying his Becker, Roscoe G., S/Sgt., AP 19391813. though the basic information received in the detention. P11lsbury, Danny H., A/lC, AP 18245964. Department is not as specl.f1c as that which Specifically, the United States Govenunent 3. While the foregoing specific cases involve has underlain the representations made to is informed and 1s compelled to believe th81t the crew members of two aircraft, it may well the Soviet Government in other cases. the Soviet Government has had and con­ be that the Soviet Government has in Its The Soviet Government has already de­ tinues to have under detention the following: custody members of the crews of other United nied knowledge of the whereabouts o! any 1. One or more members of the crew of States aircraft, particularly crew members of crew members of the B-29 destroyed by Soviet a United States Navy ~ivateer-type aircraft aircraft engaged on behalf of the United Na- June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19313 tions Command side of the m111tary action domestic bus manufacturers to produce pro­ capped persons for whom the high floors and in Korea. since 1950. totype buses that would attract greater stairs of current buses provide serious ob­ The United States Government desires that ridership, be accessible to all passengers, In­ stacles and encourage continued competition the Soviet Government make its Inquiry on cluding the elderly and physically handi· among the manufacturers of transit buses. the foregoing subject as thoroughly as pos­ capped. UMTA enlisted the of the three major do­ sible, but that it keep this Embassy Informed I am aware that many who are opposed mestic bus manufacturers, AM General, Gen­ of progress a,s soon as possible. to mandating Transbus argue that it is not eral Motors and the Flexible Co. (a wholly­ -An early response as to the Soviet Govern­ now within our ab111ty to produce a low­ owned subsidiary of Rohr Industries), to sup­ ment's intentions wit h respect to the present floor, ramped bus which can operate safely ply prototypes of such a bus !or testing. Pro­ request will be appreciated. and ef!lciently in day-to-day transit service. totypes were built by all three manufac­ End of Verbatim Text. These objections are discussed in detail 1n turers, tested by UMTA contractors and de­ the decision document and are, 1n my judg­ monstrated in actual service in !our cities. ment, satisfactorily refuted. This process enabled the development of Additionally, a Transbus mandate does draft specification for production of TO AID ELDERLY AND HANDI­ not, in my judgment, interfere with the re­ CAPPED PERSONS Transbus. sponsibillty of local otncials to plan for and In July 1976, Robert E. Patricelll, who was implement mass transportation projects. then UMTA Administrator, announced that HON. JOHN BRADEMAS· Transbus, in fact, wlll permit faster and DOT would not mandate TrNlSbus. Insteii.d, more ef!lcient bus service by mlnim1zing the the agency would permit the Antroduction of OF INDIANA time required to take on and discharge all an advanced design bus (''DB"), would IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES passengers, including those who are elderly mandate requirements for making buses ac­ or handicapped. · Wednesday, June 15, 1977 cessible to elderly and handicapped passen­ I believe it is my responsib111ty to insure gers (to become effective on February 15, Mr. BRADEMAS. Mr. Speaker, elderly to the extent feasible that no segment of 1977) and would provide funds !or research and handicapped people in this country our population is needlessly denied access and development of under-the-floor compo­ to public transportation. It is now withm nenets that would be needed by a low-floor are often isolated and homebound be­ our technological capablllty to insure that cause public transportation is not acces­ bus in the future. This decision generated elderly and handicapped persons are ac­ considerable public discussion. Many elderly sible to them. Urban mass transit buses corded access to urban mass transit buses. and handicapped groups asserted that the present barriers to disabled individuals This access is fundamental to the ability of bus accessibility requirements were unsatis­ and the elderly who' cannot board easily such persons to lead independent and pro· factory. Litigation was initiated challenging or without assistance. ductive lives. We cannot deny them rights UMTA's authority to fund acqu isition of To enable more Americans to use pub­ that so many others enjoy, when it is within ADBs. Work on developing Transbus came to lic transportation, the distinguished Sec­ our ablllty to accord them s:uch rights. a virtual halt. retary of Transportation, the Honorable PRODUCTION OF TRANSBUS Shortly after I was sworn in as Secretary of Brock Adams has recently announced A review of the record convinces me that, Transportation in January, I took several that all new public buses purchased with at a minimum, the three major domestic bus steps to address these issues. First, I an­ Department of Transportation grants manufacturers could begin Transbus deliv­ nounced that the decision against mandating eries within 3~ years. This date allows al­ Transbus would be reconsidered and a public will be designed with low fioors and most 2~ years for development before bid­ hearing on the matter would be held on ramps for easy access by older people and ding would begin, and approximately 15 March 15. Second, I waived that portion of handicapped individuals. This new months thereafter before the buses are the regulations on accessiblllty for the elderly program, Transbus, will increase the actually delivered. and handicapped that might have been in­ opportunities of disabled and elderly in­ As I said in my opening remarks at the consistent with a future decision on Trans­ dividuals to lead lives of greater inde­ Transbus hearing, we have a very competent bus, until after that decision was made. pendence. bus manufacturing capab111ty 1n this coun­ Third, I Initiated new policies and procedures try as well as abroad, and I believe competi­ !or the interim acquisition of ADBs. A deci­ Mr. Speaker, I commend Secretary tion, as well as Innovation, must be encour­ sion on Transbus was promised by May 27. Adams warmly for his decision to man­ aged. I am certain that these manufacturers In reviewing this matter I have had avail­ date the Transbus program. At this point can meet the challenge of producing Trans­ abel to me the record on which former Ad­ I insert in the RECORD his statement on bus. Additionally, I believe the pressure of ministrator Patricelll based his decision, the that decision, and the text of the decision effective competition among the manufac­ transcript of the March 15 public hearing, of Secretary Adams: turers wlll result 1n a prompt Introduction written material subsequently submitted for of this needed improvement. If one manu­ STATEMENT OF U.S. SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTA• the record, summaries of staJf discussions facturer substantially beats the effective with interested parties, also in the record, TION BROCK ADAMS AT PRESS CONFERENCE date of the mandate, we wlll consider sole ON TRANSBUS, MAY 19, 1977 and, of course, the relevant statutes I am re­ source procurements to get Transbus on the sponsible for administering. I am announcing today my decision to re­ streets as soon as it is available. quire all new publfc buses purchased with Further, I have decided to leave in effect THK- DECISION Department of Transportation grants to be the interim policy on accessiblllty for the After carefully weighing the data and views designed for easy a.ccess by elderly and 'handi­ elderly and handicapped. That is, manufac­ submitted by manufa.cturers, the American capped persons. turers must continue to offer optional Public Transit Association ("APTA"), indi­ ACCESSIBLE URBAN BUSES wheelchair lifts and local transit authorities vidual transit authorities, groups represent­ ing the elderly and handicapped and others, I am directing the use of a new bus specifi­ must either purchase buses with lifts or cation, requiring all buses offered for bid provide special services for elderly ' and I have decided, for the reasons stated below, handicapped passengers. to mandate Transbus. This mandate will take after September 30, 1979, to have a floor the form of requiring the use of a Transbus height of not more than 22 inches capable of kneeling to 18 inches above the ground SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION, specification for all standard-size buses ac­ Washington, D.C., May 19, 1977. quired with UMTA assistance. The mandate and be equipped with a. ramp for boarding. wlll apply to all procurements containing ve­ This decision is based on a public hearing DECISION OF BROCK ADAMS, SECRETARY OF hicle specifications approved by UMTA, is­ held by this department on March 15 and my TRANSPORTATION, TO M.u."DATE TRANSBUS sued for bid after September 30, 1979. The review of the information and views sub­ INTRODUCTION specifications already developed after consul­ mitted by bus manufacturers, groups repre­ The question before me is whether to man­ tation with APTA and others will be used senting the elderly and handicapped, the date or encourage the acquisition of a low­ with some minor modiflcations. The specifi­ American Public Transit Association, and floor, ramped bus ("Transbus") by all local cations Include a requirement for a station­ others. transit authorities seeking federal assistance ary floor height of not more than 22 inches. A review of the history of the Transbus for the purchase of standard-size mass transit !or an effective floor height including a kneel­ program convinces me that simply encour­ buses, after a certain date. Further question ing feature of not more than 18 inches, and aging Transbus may not result in its Intro­ include: 1f Transbus is mandated, what for a ramp for boarding and exiting. duction now or in the future. Even atter this should be (i) the effective date of the man­ Additionally, I have decided that DOT department invested about $27 million tn date; (11) the design of the bus; (111) the fed­ should encourage the formation of groups of the Transbus program, all serious efforts to­ eral role in introducing the bus; and (iv) the purchasers to make the initial purchases o! ward producing Transbus stopped when the interim bus acquisition policy. Transbus through advertised, low-bid com­ Urban Mass Transportation Administration In 1971, the Urban Mass Transportation petitions. Progress payments w1ll be per­ announced in July, 1976, that it would not Administration ("UMTA") of the Department mitted for these initial purchases. Finally, I bo mandated. of Transportation ("DOT") initiated a :najor have decided to leave in effect the interim MANDATE TO DEVELOP TRANSBUS research project to develop an improved poUcy on accessiblllty for the elderly and As most of you are aware, the Transbus transit but that would attract mass ridership, handicapped. That is, manufacturers must program enlisted the aid of the three major be accessible to those elderly and handi- continue to offer optional wheelchair lifts, 19314 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 and local transit authorities must either pur­ In April 1976, the earlier guidance to grantees The history of change in bus design is not chase buses with lifts or provide special serv­ was formalized and strengthened by the pub­ one of constant innovation. As noted earlier, ices for elderly and handicapped passengers. llcatlon of UMTA's regulations on transpor­ the so-called "new look" bus, the one cur­ Each of these decisions is discussed more tation for elderly and handicapped persons. rently in use, was introduced in 1959.2 ADBs fully below. These regulations set forth a comprehensive will not be in the streets for another year and THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK scheme of planning, service and design do not offer the advances of Transbus. In 1964, Congress responded to a growing requirements. A review of the statutes that guide this pattern of declining ridership and increasing DOT has long recognized that a low-floor, decision suggests strongly that any inclina­ financial difficulties in the Nation's mass standard-size bus that provides access for tion to postpone a mandate further would transports. tion systems by enacting the ur­ nonambulatory and wheelchair-bound pas­ thwart the intent of the Congress. A review ban Mass Transportation Act of 1964 (UMT sengers would be an effective means to ac­ of recent litigation suggests equally strongly Act). There have been several major amend­ commodate these several statutory mandates. that the courts are also not prepared to ments since 1964, and, as amended, it con­ The Tranbus program was initiated, at least countenance needless delay in making urban tinues to provide the legislative basis for the in part, to test the fea.stb111ty of such a bus. mass transit vehicles accessible to the elderly federal role in urban mass transports. tlon. Of the methods of accomplishing accessi­ and handicapped. Section 2 of the UMT Act states that its pur­ b111ty that were studied and demonstrated Even if the Congressional and judicial con­ poses are: to assist in the development of in the Transbus program, UM'I'A acknowl­ cerns were not as clear as they are, I believe improved mass transportation fac111tles, edged that the ramped Transbus emerged as it is my responsibillty to insure to the extent equipment, techniques, and methods; to en­ the most desirable. The ramp was nonethe­ feasible. that no segment of our population courage the planning and establishment of less not required in the specifications that is needlessly denied access to public trans­ areawide mass transportation systems needed were subsequently developed. The existing portation. It is now within our technological for economical and desirable urban develop­ statutory mandates regarding transportation capabllity to insure that elderly and handi­ ment; and to provide assistance to State and for the elderly and handicapped and the .t:apped persons are accorded access to urban local governments and their instrumentali­ proven feasibility of a low-floor, ramped mass transit buses. This access is fundamen­ ties in financing such systems. Transbus that will result in substantial tal to the ablllty of such persons to lead in­ To accomplish these purposes, sections 3 benefits to the able-bodied as well as the dis­ dependent and productive lives. In my view, and 5 of the UMT Act authorize grants to abled, argue convincingly for a Transbus a decision assuring that access could have State and local publlc bodies to assist in the mandate. been made some years ago. financing of maS3 transportation related Section 16 of the UMT Act, section 504 of Today, the ADB represents the state-of­ capital fac11lties including standard-sized the Rehab111tatlon Act and other statuto['y the-art in bus design from ~he floor up. But transit buses. The federal share of a capital provisions have resulted in a number of law­ their floor height (even with a kneeling fea­ facilities grant under section 3 is 80 per­ suits brought by elderly and handicapped ture) does not make them accessible to the cent of net project cost. Under section 5, persons. Although DOT has generally been elderly and handicapped without a wheel­ which also authorizes payments for operat­ successful in that litigation, litigation suc­ chair lift. The 11ft is an expensive piece of ing assistance, the Federal share of a capt tal cess alone provides no reason to a void or hardware, principally benefiting those in facil1tles grant is a maximum of 80 percent defer a federal mandate ot technological im­ wheelchairs. Many of those individuals, how­ of net project cost.l provements as they become available, espe­ ever, regard the lift as degrading and have Section 6 of the UMT Act, under which the cially when, as here, those improvements expressed concern about the difficulty and Transbus research activities were funded au·­ significantly advance the mass transporta­ safety of. using it. In addition, use of the lift thorizes research, development and de~on­ tion interests of all persons, including the slows bus operations since it takes time to stration projects in all phases of urban mass elderly and handicapped, and when the im­ deploy and other passengers cannot board or transportation. Section 9 authorizes grants provements are quite unlikely to be intro­ exit during that time. for urban mass transportation planning and duced without a federal mandate. The low-floor Transbus can, on the other technical studies. There ls one additional statutory reason, hand, accommodate a ramp. The ramp is A 1970 amendment to the UMT Act de­ apart from improved accessibility, for :nan­ swift to deploy and can be used beneficially clared the mass transports.tion needs of dating Transbus. First, DOT has a statutory by many passengers, including most cate­ elderly and handicapped persons to be of na­ obligation to assist in the development of gories of mobile elderly and handicapped. A tional importance and required DOT to ex­ improved mass transportation fac111ties and low-floor, ramped bus w111 decrease the load­ ercise a special leadership role to insure that equipment. Until the recent introduction of ing and unloading time for all passengers. their rights were protected. This 1970 amend­ ADB's there had been essentially no change It is important to keep in mind that in ment added section 16 to the Act to read in in bus design since the advent of the "new discussing bus accessibillty for the elderly part, an follows: ' look" bus in 1959. The advanced designs and handicapped we are not concerned only SECTION 16. (a) It is hereby declared to be pa-esently being offered are logical intermedi­ with those confined to wheelchairs. We are the national policy that elderly and handi­ ate steps on the way to the introduction of concerned as well with any mob111ty-im­ capped persons have the same right as other Transbus, and in fact, they are in part out­ paire•d person, a group which numbers at persons to utilize mass transportation faclli­ growths of the Transbus program. Yet these least 10 mlllion. At any time there may be tles and services; that special efforts shall be advanced designs fall short of accomplishing many other riders who are at least tempo­ made in the planning and design of mass one of the major goals of the Tra.nsbus pro­ rarilt disabled. We cannot deny these people transportation facillties and services so that gram-a low-floor with attendant benefits in the rights that so many others enjoy when the avallab111ty to elder!~ and handicapped boarding and existing for all passengers. it is within our ab111ty to accord them such persons of mass transportation which they Thus, a Transbus mandate will bring to rights. can effectively utilize will be assured; and fruition the full benefits of federally-assisted I am acutely aware that many who are op­ that all Federal programs offering assistance research and developmen-t in the area of posed to Transbus argue that it is not now in the field of mass transoortation (includ­ stand~rd-size buses. within our ability to produce a low-floor, ing the programs under this Act) should con­ Finally, as the transit bus ma1·ket has ramped bus which can operate safely and t:tin provisions implementing this policy." moved to new levels of product improvement, efficiently in day-to-day transit service. Equally important, section 504 of the Re­ it has become increasingly difficult to fashion These objections are discussed in detail be­ hab111tation Act of 1973 established the right procurement methods since ADB's are of low and, in my Judgment, satisfactorily of every handicapped person to be free of somewhat different designs, with different refuted. discrimination in any federally-assisted pro­ levels of performance and, quite naturally, Further, a Transbus mandate does not in­ gram. Section 504 reads: different prices. A Transbus mandate will terfere with the traditional responsibility of "No otherwise qualified handicapped indi­ provide the necessary federal leadership in local officials to plan for and implement mass vidual in the United States . . . shall, solely the marketplace to allow transit bus manu­ transportation projects. Routes, schedules by reason of his handicap, be excluded from facturers to plan investments and tooling and fares continue to be matters of local de­ the participation in, be denied the benefits costs around certain required minimum per­ cision and State and local officials retain the of, or be subjected to discrimination under formance and design characteristics. This, in any program or activity receiving Federal turn, wm permit low-bid procurements that :1 The lack of innovation in bus design financial assistance." will assist in the maintenance of a viable and prompted a study by the National Academy Shortly after the adoption of section 16, competitive bus manufacturing industry of Engineering (NAE) documenting the need DOT began implementing the legislative based upon a predictable federal policy. for an improved transit bus. The NAE study mandate requiring special federal lea.dershlo THE NEED FOR A MANDATE concluded that a low-floor bus was: "The in the area of mass transportation for elderly A review of the history of the Transbus most desirable means-within the existing and handicapped persons through written program convinces me that simply encourag­ state of the art-for improving bus trans­ guidelines for UMTA grantees. UMTA also ing Transbus will not result 1n its prompt portation." The low-floor, the NAE noted, financed research .and studies in the area. introduction and may not result in its intro­ would result tn a bus that was "not only ... duction even in the long-run. Even after easy and comfortable to use, but usable 1 The Federal-Aid Highway Act of 1973 .also approximately $27 m1llion of UMTA invest­ readily and without embarrassment by the authorizes capital assistance to mass trans­ ment, all serious efforts toward producing physically and economically handicapped, portation including assistance to acquire Transbus stopped when UMTA announced the aged, the pregnant woman, the business­ standard size transit buses. in July 1976 that it would not be mandated. man, and the young adult." June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19315 authority to plan for and implement all The TPR was developed for DOT by Booz­ There is, however, another important re­ transit services including specialized services Allen Applied Research with full participa­ sponsibility for the government to under­ where these can contribute to overall tion by the APTA Bus Technology Commit­ l;ake in introducing 'lransbus into the mar­ mobility needs. For those communities utiliz­ tee, AM General, General Motors, Flexible, ketplace. We should, I believe, do everything ing standard-size bus service over fixed and UMTA. It was designed to be used by feasible to assure early purchases of sub­ routes, the Transbus will permit faster and procuring agencies in competitive procure­ stantial numbers of the first production more efficient bus service by minimizing the ments of Transbuses under the UM:TA Capi­ Transbuses. To this end, we will encourage time required to take on and discharge all tal Grants Program. formation of purchaser groups to make in­ passengers, including those who are elderly It was originally intended that the Trans­ itial procurements of Transbuses from each or handicapped. Better accessibility, new bus prototypes developed by each manufac .. manufacturer through advertised, low-bid styling features and a. better ride will attract turer would be tested and evaluated and a competitions. While I do not think it is ap­ and retain new ridership, and to the operat­ winning design selected for use by all manu~ propriate to allocate the market in an effort ing revenue of transit operators and enhance facturers. However, while the three Trans~ to guarantee that each manufacturer's bus the image of mass transportation in every bus manufacturers met the performance re­ will be bought, we will permit each consor­ community. Moreover, testimony at the pub­ quirements for Transbus prototypes, all tium to make initial Transbus purchases lice hearing, as well as a. number of com­ three used different approaches based on from more than one manufacturer if the ments on the Transbus question, indicate their individual body styling, construction consortium members so desire. that several communities have been and con­ and manufacturing techniques. UMTA con­ Additionally, we wlll agree to make progress tinue to be vitally interested in obtaining cluded that to require all three manufac­ payments in connection with these initial low-floor standard-size buses, but have been turers to build buses around one manufac­ purchases to help defray start-up produc­ unable to do so because of the commercial turer's design would put two of the manu­ tion costs. As I have already stated, we will unavailabllity of Tra.nsbus. A Tra.nsbus man­ facturers at an unnecessary competitive dis·· also consider making sole source procure­ date will permit DOT to be responsive to advantage and would stifle innovation. ments of any manufacturer's Transbus which these locally conceived mass transportation Thus, the design specification approach was is available substantially earlier than the objectives, as contemplated by the UMT abandoned on January 8, 1975, when UMTA others. Act. announced a. policy which would permit all I believe that these steps represent the maximum necessary federal role in intro­ THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE MANDATE three designs to qualify for production if ducing Transbus. The record of the March 15 hearing (and they met a. performance specification to be the hearing conducted by UMTA in 1976) developed by UMTA as a result of testing INTERIM ACCESSmiLITY POLICY contains conflicting projections of when and evaluation of the prototype vehicles. I am aware that even after Transbus is Transbus could be ready for production. AM The specifications that were develope:i as mandated purchases of conventional buses General indicates that Transbus could be a result of this decision nevertheless include will continue, with UMTA financial assist­ available approximately 34 months from the certain design requirements such as floor ance, for slightly more than two years. Inas­ date of a. mandate. Flexible says 36-60 height, door width, step riser height and much as these newly purchased buses wm months, and G~nera.l Motors says five years. tread depths intended to insure that acces­ continue in operation for 12 or more years, These manufacturers have different views sibility goals are met. The specifications in­ I believe it is necessary to announce the pol­ about the deslrablllty of Transbus and the clude options for features such as power icy that we wlll follow concerning accessi­ adequacy of ADBs, and their existing in­ plant size, air-conditioning, bus width, bus bility of mass transit for elderly and handi­ vestments reflect these judgments. length, etc. The TPR requires every manu­ capped in the period before the introduction My analysis of the enttre record con­ facturer to be able to bid on any specified of Transbus. I have decided that our existing vinces me that all three current manufac­ combination of options in direct cost com­ policy in this matter should be continued. turers could begin deliveries in 3 Y2 years. petition. The specifications are intended to That policy is based on requirements that This date allows almost 2 Y2 years for develop­ be modified, from time to time, as improved all manufacturers offer optional equipment ment before bidding would begin, and ap­ components or designs are developed. (e.q., lifts) for loading wheelchair-bound proximately 15 months thereafter before the I am today adopting, with some modifica­ and other handicapped passengers, and that buses are actually delivered. tions, the specifications developed and set local transit authorities must either pur­ As I sa.ld in my opening remarks at the forth in the TPR. The most important modi­ chase accessible buses, or provide special Tra.nsbus hearing, we have a. very competent fication is the one which makes the ramp services suitable for transporting elder!y bus manufacturing industry and I believe a mandatory feature of the bus. The TPR and handicapped passengers. competition, as well as innovation, must be as modified, will be available from UMTA o~ :Many handicapped passengers have ex­ encouraged. I am certain that these manu­ June 13. pressed concern about the operation and facturers can meet the challenge of produc­ In my judgment, use of this specification safety of the lift. Additionally, the lifts are ing Tra.nsbus. Additionally, I believe the will promote the earliest availability of cumbersome and time-consuming to operat e pressure of effective competition among the Transbus without stUUng innovation in and will become entirely outmoded by the manufacturers will result in a. prompt intro­ manufacture and design. Transbus ramp. They do, however, ma1:e duction of. this needed improvement. If one THE FEDERAL ROLE IN INTRODUCING TRANSBUS buses accessible to mobility-impaired pas­ manufacturer is ready substantially before sengers. On the other hand, many elderly As I indicated above, DOT has already in­ and handicapped representatives oppose spe­ the effecive date of the mandate, we will vested approximately $27 million in the consider sole source procurements to get cial services since they require advance noti­ Transbus program. As a result of that invest­ fication or have other dlsadavantages not Tra.nsbus on the streets as soon as tt 1s ment we have learned what is and is not a.valla.ble. associated with regular scheduled bus serv­ technologically feasible in connection with ice. These representatives argue that "sepa­ Accordingly, as I stated above, I am order­ development of a low-floor, ramped bus. We ing that all bus procurements utlllzing rate but equal" transit services are inher­ have identified the problems of the proto­ ently unequal and do not enable elderly and UMTA capital assistance funds must use the type buses as well as solutions to them. we Tra.nsbus specifications after September 30, handicapped persons to lead the most fully have determined which components need integrated lives possible. 1979. I urge those manufacturers who can further development, and which are pres­ to make Transbus available voluntarily at ently able to be produced. In my judgment, Accordingly, I believe it appropriate to al­ an earlier date. tho $27 mlllion was well spent. low local governments to decide how best to serve their elderly and handicapped popu­ THE DESIGN OF TRANSBUS I am aware that costs remain in connection lations until Transbus is ready for produc­ In connection with the research effort with going to production models of Trans­ bus. I am convinced, however, that this type tion. Those who purchase lift-equipped buses to develop Tra.nsbus. UMTA developed a. will thereby offer substantially enhanced complete procurement document-the of cost should properly be borne by the man­ ufacturers. Direct federal funding for tool­ accessibility to their elderly and handicapped Tra.nsbus Procurement Requirements (TPR) citizens. Those offering special services wt.ll -for use by local transit authorities tn ing and start-up costs is not appropriate given the knowledge and experience already provide valuable experience for the period buying Tra.nsbuses. The document contains after Transbus is introduced since even fUlly four parts: gained through the DOT investment. Prod­ uct quality, production methods and related accessible fixed route buses wi11 not meet Part I: Bid Requirements/Contractual the transportation needs of all elderly ar:.d Provisions. Provides legal and other instru­ matters are and shoUld be uniquely the re­ sponsibility of the manufacturer. handicapped. DOT will carefully monitor the ments for procuring coaches; activities of grantees of UMTA funds to be Part II: Technical Specifications. Specifies This would not be the case had the federal certain that the transportation needs of the buses being procured; investment not already proven the under­ lying feasibillty of Transbus. We could not elderly and handicapped citizens are being Part III: Quality Assurance Provisions. reasonably require manufacturers to invest addressed. Specifies the minimum quality control re­ in a wholly unproven technology. But, as THE TECHNOLOGICAL FEASmiLITY OF TRANSBUS quirements in the manufacture of the discussed more completely elsewhere, I am A critical factor in determining the desir­ buses; and convinced the technology for Transbus is ability of a Federal mandate of Transbus IS Part IV: Warranty Provisions. Describes proven and consequently I believe it appro­ technological and economic feasibility. I find the warranty coverage on the buses after priate to require the manufacturers to put that a bus that meets the existing Transbu s their acceptance by local transit authorities. that technology into production. specifications, as modified to require a ramp, 19316 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 serves the needs of the elderly lind handle The record of the public hearing and stud­ BALTIC STATES GENOCIDE DAY capped, can be produced in a reasonable pee ies done for UMTA demonstrate the emcacy riod of time and would be operationally ac· of the ramp in providing access for those oeptable. with mob111ty impairments. The Transbus HON. TOM CORCORAN Axles, tires and brakes are the most unique specifications call for a ramp that wm yield OF n.LINOIS components of the Transbus. These compo­ the full benefit of this technology. The spec­ nents do not require technological break­ ifications provide that the maximum ramp IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES throughs, but merely enough time for proper angle on a level street with no curb must Wednesday, June 15, 1977 development. The Transbus prototypes, not be more than 14 degrees. This means manufactured by AM General, General that on a level street With a six-inch curb, Mr. CORCORAN of Dlinois. Mr. Speak­ Motors and Flexible, showed that in at least the ramp angle will be less than ten degrees; er, during the night of June 14, 1941, one instance the new axles were lightweight, even with a typical crowned street and no hundreds of Soviet Secret Police swept used many existing internal subcomponents curb, the ramp angle would be approxi­ through the three tiny Baltic States of and can accommodate the current design mately 15 degrees. This is within the range Latvia, Estonia, and Lithuania. These automatic transmission. in which most wheelchair-bound persons can Similarly, Transbus will probably require be expected to make unassisted entry al­ "merchants of terror" arrested thou­ tires which are substantially smaller than though in some cases those in wheelchairs sands of citizens, dragging them from those presently available. Such tires have may need assistance in exiting. These angles their beds to be transported to the hor­ been undergoing development for some time can be accommodated with a ramp not more rors of slave labor camps in the far and could be put into production in time than 6 feet long and a slight incline where reaches of the Soviet Union. Many of for Transbus deliveries. While I understand the ramp meets the bus floor. This type of these people were never heard from that these tires will have shorter lives than technology has already been utmzed by at again. current tires, estimates of Transbus operating least one of the prototype manufacturers. This despicable act ended the brief costs, as discussed later, include an assumpe Probably the most complex feasib111ty tion that the smaller tires will be used. In questions with respect to Transbus involve reign of liberty in the Baltic States, my view, any problems that the tires may its economic viab1lity. The Transbus proto­ which had begun only two decades cause are more than offset by the greater types included spacious seating arrange­ earlier. accessib111ty of the Transbus. ments with seating capacity for 42 to 43 peo­ Since then, the tribulations of the Bal­ Transbus brakes will also be somewhat ple as compared to the maximum seating tic people read like a modern day Book different than existing bus brakes, yet wm capacity of current production buses of 51 of Job. They have suffered the collectivi­ utilize essentially the same technology. Dee to 53. Actually, Transbus could have a seat­ zation of their farms and the nationali­ spite the smaller diameter wheels, the Transe ing capacity of 47 if it is designed with that zation of their industry. They have en­ bus specification provides for more brake goal in mind. ADBs seat between 43-47 pas4 area per pound of vehicle weight than on sengers, depending on their seat design. dured religious persecution and their current buses. Since this specification can Therefore, I do not believe that there will be children have endured brainwashing at be met using conventional drum brakes, very a serious loss of seating capacity. Moreover, the hands of Communist teachers. little development will be required. full load capacity is more relevant in deter­ Hundreds of thousands of Latvians, Several Transbus operating issues have mining transit system revenues, and Trans­ Estonians, and Lithuanians have been arisen. These include road clearance, prob­ bus will have a full load capacity comparable deported-scattered to the far corners of lems associated with the kneeling feature and to current buses. the Soviet Union-to be replaced by the appropriate width of the front door. Be­ A similar situation exists with regard to cause the Transbus prototypes experienced weight and fuel economy. The Transbus spec­ usurpers from other parts of the Com­ minor road clearance problems, the final ifications require that curb weight not exceed munist confederation. The reason for Transbus specifications require additional 26,000 pounds. This weight is about 1,000 to this wholesale forced migration is simple: road clearance. After the prototypes were 2,000 pounds more than current production the Communist masters wish to destroy tested, every observed ground clearance prob­ buses but is the same as the ADB speclfi­ the national identity of the Baltic peo­ lem was carefully analyzed and the final ca tions. The added weight is a reflection of ple. They know that the surest way to specifications written so as to eliminate those the need for an additional axle and related conquer a people is to destroy their iden­ problems within the limits of the prototype components. Transbus rel1ab111ty and main­ tity as a nation. technology. The specifications call for road ta.inablllty have become issues as a result of clearance equivalent to or better than that the greater complexity of Transbus proto­ Try as they might, though, the masters attained by all three current model buses. types, especially as compared to current of the Kremlin have not been able to ex­ Some problems have been experienced in buses. The low-fioor of the Transbus neces­ tinguish the "Light of Liberty" complete­ the past with the kneeling feature found on sitates greater mechanical complexity in the ly. It is only a dim glow, but it is there. ADBs, some current buses and Transbus. running gear of the bus, but does not neces­ And like a smoldering ember in a forest, First, the earliest kneeling devices did not sitate new or unique technology. It is impor­ it waits only for a fresh breeze to burst always operate properly. This was found to be tant to remember that there has been no sig­ into life. a result of corrosion within electrical com­ nificant change in bus design in almost 20 ponents. When greater protection for that years. It is not surprising, therefore, that The Baltic people in this country nur­ system was provided, the problem was solved. those with responsiblllty for maintaining ture that tiny glow. They continue to Further, there were complaints of drivers buses are concerned. Experience and famll~ maintain their national traditions-reli­ not kneeling the bus when passengers needed iarity with these changes and good product gious, civic, and cultural-and to work in it. While this remains a potential problem, design will remedy this problem. I am, there­ behalf of th~ir countrymen, who are it can be overcome by proper driver training. fore, convinced that bus maintainabllity and pinned beneath the boot heels of their A bus that can kneel to at least 18 inches reliab111ty will not be seriously affected. Above Russian oppressors. wlll benefit all passengers, not just those who the fioor, Transbus will be similar to ADBs. need the ramp. These benefits far outweigh We will have had considerable experience These people have not given up, and the dimculties. with ADBs before Transbuses are actually on neither should we. So long as the Soviet The front door width called for in the the street. Union continues to treat the Baltic peo­ specifications is 44 inches. This is wide Because of its greater complexity, smaller ple as conquered subjects; as long as the enough to allow room for wheelchair-bound diameter tires and slightly increased weight, Russians treat the Baltic people like passengers or to allow for a double stream the Transbus wlll cost more than the cur­ cattle, to be shipped wherever it pleases of ambulatory passengers. This feature is rent bus. The most reliable cost estimates the Moscow regime; in short, as long as desired by many operators because it allows indicate that, while the initial cost of Trans­ the Russians continue their program of an inbound and outbound stream at the bus will be approximately 15 to 18 percent national genocide, we in the United same time, thus shortening the loading and more than current buses, this is only about States must continue to refuse to recog­ unloading time. Some operators prefer a nar­ five percent more than ADBs. A comprehen­ row (24") door making a double stream sive analysis of cost estimates showed that nize the illegal Soviet domination of the impossible and, therefore, fares easier to col­ the Transbus would have operating costs Baltic States. lect. The productivity improvements stem­ only about one percent higher than current Furthermore, if President Carter is ming from the wide door and consequent re­ sincere in his desire to promote human duced loading time should more than offset buses. I conclude that these added costs are any occasional inconvenience in fare collec­ not unreasonable in light of the substantial rights throughout the world, he must tion, and the wide door is a prerequisite to benefits to all bus riders which Transbus will continue to make clear to the Soviets achieving accessibility. For these reasons, the provide. that the United States will always sup­ narrow door option has been dropped from BROCK ADAMS, port the aspirations of people in the Bal­ the specifications. Secretary of Transportation. tic States to regain their freedom. June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19317 clerk, Ms. Murray was the first woman It is my belief, Mr. Speaker, that the· Go along will of the Baltic people, and their com­ without elected as city clerk, Ms. Murray was the mitment to liberty, will ultimately pre­ enthusi- No first woman to be elected president of vail over the bayonets of the Communist + Pro asm Con opinion the Calumet City Chamber of Com­ invaders. merce. She also has served as the cham­ With regard to the ~roblem ber's secretary and vice president. To ~~ 8n~~J~~hl~~rat i on, those privileged to know her personally, (a) Give 1st priority in our she is a devoted friend, church worker, POPULAR SUPPORT FOR STRONG foreign policy agenda and respected community member. to controlling the NUCLEAR NONPROLIFERATION spread of nuclear I know my colleagues join with me MEASURES 72 14 8 6 and the people of Calumet City and (b) u~~g~~ry-ban""ihii" sale of sensitive nu­ Thornton Township in commending Ms. clear technology and Murray for her years of service. HON. JONATHAN B. BINGHAM fuel to nonnuclear OF NEW YORK weapons nations.... 43 20 22 15 (c) Seek agreement with IN THE HOUSE OP REPRESENTATIVES all other nuclear ex­ porting nations to WORLD WAR I VETERANS Wednesday, June 15, 1977 ban the sale of sensi­ tive nuclear technol­ Mr. BINGHAM. Mr. Speaker, each ogy and fuel to non­ year the Foreign Policy Association con­ nuclear weapons na- HON. CLAUDE PEPPER ducts a poll on a number of key foreign tions______64 13 9 14 OF FLORWA (d) Give priority to devel­ policy issues. The results of the "Great oping nonnuclear en­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Decisions '77 Opinion Ballots" are in er~ sources even if th1s means a slower Wednesday, June 15, 1977 and indicate wide support for strong rate of economic nuclear nonproliferation efforts by the growth for the United _Mr. PEPPER. Mr. Speaker, truly, the U.S. Government: 72 percent of the poll's States------51 17 18 14 forgotten man in America is the veteran respondents gave "first priority in our of World War I. His average age is now foreign policy agenda to controlling the 81. Only 850,000 of them survive today spread of nuclear weapons: 64 percent MS. HELEN E. MURRAY out of a mighty horde of 4,750,000 who of the respondents urged the United turned the tide in favor of the Allies who States to "seek agreement with all other were face to face with defeat when the nuclear exporting nations to ban the HON. MARTY. RUSSO first Americans entered the trenches. sale of sensitive nuclear technology and OF ILLINOIS Seventy-five percent of today's living fuel to nonnuclear weapons states. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVI:S Americans were not yet born at that I believe that the Foreign Policy As­ Wednesday, June 15, 1977 time. sociation's poll offers the Congress a For his sacrifice and efforts that cul­ significant indication of how informed Mr~ RUSSO. Mr. Speaker, I would like minated in victory, the World War I vet­ Americans feel about the proliferation to congratulate a distinguished citizen eran, upon discharge, was given train issue. of Illinois and of my district on the oc­ fare home and the princely sum of $60 The Great Decisions poll, as noted in casion of her leaving her post as Calumet cash to buy civilian clothes and get a the Foreign Policy Association's June City city clerk. new start in life. 1977 newsletter excerpted below, involved For 38 years, Ms. Helen E. Murray has Sixty dollars.· more than 60,000 Americans in discus­ been an e1fective. dedicated, and cour­ No GI education bill. no GI housing sion groups throughout the Nation: teous public servant, and on June 24. the loans, no VA hospitalization-except for The 1977 program-23rd in an annual se­ people of Calumet City will honor her at service-connected disabilities--no vet­ ries begun by FPA in 1955-involved an esti­ a testimonial dinner. How many contri­ erans' employment services. And he came mated 60,000 Americans in discussion groups butions she has made during these years. into a civilian economy on a downward across the nation. Participants are not a During World War I. from 1941 to plunge following the war boom years. national cross-section such as 1s used in a 1946, Ms. Murray was the price clerk on Very many could not find jobs. Many Gallup poll. Their participation indicates could not adjust adequately to a non-war that, on the average, they have more educa­ Calumet City's Ration Board. She was assistant city clerk from 1946 until 1957 environment. Many had mental scars tion than most Americans and take a more from the shocks of war. lively interest in foreign affairs. This is prob­ and was elected city clerk three times, ably still more true of those who took the serving from 1965 until the spring of this Within 10 years came the great depres­ trouble to 1lll out ballots. Moreover, those year. sion and many of those who were begin­ ning to get their feet on the ground responding are more inclined than the In the 12 years Ms. Murray served as average citizen to make their views known. found their economic base swept away To a question whether the participant had, city clerk, she set a standard of perform­ from under them. in the past year, "communicated with some ance and respect for the office which will Even a march on Washington was of offtclal or representative in Washington (by be diftlcult to match. City residents knew little avail. Congress, in the early 1930's, letter, telephone, etc. or in person) on some her as the gracious lady in the city hall did issue an "adjusted service certificate" foreign policy matter," some 15% said yes, who offered the services of her office with based on the length of time the veteran a figure far above the national average. Sur­ such efficiency and courteousness and served, but again, it was woefully inade­ veys have indicated that even at the height who insisted that her sta1f do the same. of the , fewer than 3% of the quate. it averaged only $547.50 per population communicated with offtclals in During these years, she made major veteran. Washington regarding foreign affairs. changes in the omce of clerk, such as up­ Other efforts were made to more ade­ Great Decisions participants thus repre­ dating the bookkeeping records, updating quately compensate World War I vet­ sent an tmoortant minority of the elec­ city sticker lists, getting plans adooted erans, but most of this legislation was torate-one which Is above average In Inter­ for recodifying ordinances and, because based on need. Increases in personal in­ ests, knowledge and activity In regard to of such efforts, Calumet City was named come, social security benefits, and others foreign policy. the No. 1 city in Cook County in special all too often nu111fled the payments vet­ Participants were polled on a number assessments. bookkeeping, and bond pay­ erans were meant to receive. of key foreign policy issues including ments. Her administration of the clerk's The ranks of those veterans are thin­ Middle East policy, conventional arms office and its employees won acclaim ning rapidly. Only 1 in 5 survive today. control issues, and the nuclear prolifera­ throughout the State of IDinois. Mr. Speaker, we have delayed long tion dilemma. The results in the latter But her contributions and impressive enough. We have side-stepped justice area outlined below, give a strong indi­ record do not end with the clerk's office. long enough. While there is yet time, cation of the depth of concern held by She is active in the Calumet City Cham­ while some of these veterans still live, the American people on the prolifera­ ber of Commerce and, in addition to this Congress must act to express a small tion crisis: being the first woman elected as city measure of our Nation's gratitude to 19318 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 those valiant men who saved our Nation's options, both will be ruled out anyw'ay if must never allow its dedication to human honor in World War I. the Kremlin ultimately accepts the strategic rights to diminish. arms control package proposed by the Presi­ With the support and cooperation of I am today introducing legislation to dent, which would forbid deployment of new pay service pensions to veterans of World land-based ICBMs and place range restric­ millions throughout this country and With I, their surviving spouses, and tions on the cruise missile. other nations, we can urge the Soviet children. Strategic bombers have some special char­ Union to comply with the human rights acteristics in their favor. provisions of the Helsinki Final Act and Bombers, unlike ballistic missiles, take sev­ ensure that the just cause of Lithuanian eral hours to reach their targets and can be self-determination will not be aban­ THE CASE FOR THE B-1 called back. This is a comforting thought to doned. Presidents, who don't like the idea of order­ ing Armageddon on 15 minutes' notice; it is HON. ROBERT J. LAGOMARSINO an important consideration for the rest of us, SPRING QUESTIONNAffiE OF CALIFORNIA too. The B-1 is designed for high-speed, low­ RESULTS IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES level penetration of Soviet air defenses. But Wednesday, June 15, 1977 it would be too slow for us~ as a surprise­ HON. JIM LLOYD attack weapon. Thus the B-1 would appear Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Mr. Speaker, a less threatening than the same number of OF CALIFORNIA decision on the future of the B-1 bomber missiles to any potential adversary who IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES is expected soon. As an advocate for con­ thinks that a surprise U.S. attack is a serious Wednesday, June 15, 1977 tinuing the program, I would like to call possibility. to the attention of my colleagues the Los Finally, because bombers can easily be dis­ Mr. LLOYD of California. Mr. Speaker, Angeles Times editorial of June 10, 1977. persed among many airfields and can be air­ I would like to share the results of my borne on short notice, they are relatively in­ spring questionnaire which was sent to I believe the editorial explains concisely vulnerable to surprise attack themselves. and forcefully the reasons for continuing The B-1 bomber is costly. So, unfortunate­ every household in the 35th District. the B-1 bomber program: ly, are all modern weapon systems. But the Energy, the size of the Federal Gov­ THE CASE FOR THE B-1 B-1 would greatly enhance this country's ernment, and crime are recognized as It appears that President Carter w111 soon security-and do it in a way that would least prime concerns of the Nation. Congress announce a decision to go ahead with the interfere with efforts to interest the Russians is responding to these problems and re­ B-1 bomber program. The decision would be in reducing the strategic arsenals on both cently passed legislation which would controversial-especially in view of the Presi­ sides. create a department of energy to con­ dent's preelection skepticism toward the solidate and focus our energy effort. project. Other proposals, such as taxes on gaso­ But, in view of the nature of the Soviet LITHUANIAN OCCUPATION line and gas guzzlers, are the subject of Union's growing strategic arsenal and the REMEMBERED likely shape of an eventual strategic arms intense study and will be ready for a limitation agreement, we believe that a de­ vote within the next few months. cision to proceed with the new bomber would HON. LAWRENCE COUGHLIN The administration has accelerated be sound. OF PENNSYLVANIA congressional efforts to cut back on the Opposition to the B-1 has centered on its size and cost of the Federal Government, cost-$102 milllon per plane, according to IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES beginning with zero-base budget studies the latest estimates-and on the argument Wednesday, June 15, 1977 of the Executive omce and major agen­ that manned bombers aren't necessary in an era when nuclear missiles can reach any­ Mr. COUGHLIN. Mr. Speaker, for Lith­ cies. My regulatory reform proposal, place on earth in less time than it takes to uanians, June 15 is a sad reminder that which requires an agency's "self-destruc­ drive to the oftlce. Neither point is persuasive. the right of all men to rule themselves tion" after a set number of years, is part U.S. defense strategy is based on the thesis should not be taken for granted. On this of the proposed Federal Energy Admin­ that this country must maintain strategic day in 1940, the independent Republic of istration's charter and, hopefully, will forces that, even if hit by a surprise nuclear Lithuania was invaded by Soviet forces, become a requirement for all regulatory attack, will be capable of retaliating with occupied, and forcibly annexed to the agencies whose continued existence enough force to destroy the attacking na­ should be periodically justified. tion. The American posture in the SALT Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. negotiations assumes that the Russians are Although Lithuania revolted in 1941 In response to national fears about entitled to the same assurance. and mounted a guerrilla war from 1944 to crime, Congress has drafted and passed The American nuclear deterrent now rests­ 1953, the nation has not been able to a number of bills in such areas as juve­ on a triad of B-52 strategic bombers, land­ free herself from Soviet domination. nile delinquency and law enforcement based Minuteman missiles and submarine­ Lithuania has paid dearly for its fight assistance to local police departments. launched missiles. If the Russians• new Back­ to regain independence. Thousands of The recodification of public laws now in fire bomber is deployed as a strategic weapon, Lithuanians died in the resistance to So­ process will include a recommendation Soviet forces will constitute a similar triad. for mandatory sentencing for convic­ H~wever, the aging B-52s are increasingly viet annexation and hundreds of thou­ incapable of penetrating Soviet air defenses, sands more were imprisoned or deported tions of certain Federal crimes. Man­ and the Minuteman ICBMs are growing more to Siberian prison camps and exiled. To datory sentencing, if it passes the test of and more vulnerable as the Soviet Union the people of Lithuanian descent the courts, will expedite due process and builds up a fleet of superheavy offensive mis­ throughout the world, the sorrow that solve the problem of persons committing siles. additional offenses while awaiting sen­ The sea-based leg of the American triad has afflicted their homeland has not been is still in good shape, and will be in even eased by the years which have passed tencing for a previous violent crime. better shape when subs equipped with larger, since World War II. The House has passed the Water Pol­ longer-range Trident missiles go on station. Despite the recent Soviet signing of lution Control Act and the Clean Air Act No President, though, can feel comfortable the Final Act at Helsinki, documented Amendments, which continue and ex­ about depending too heavily on a sea-based reports of ruthless Soviet oppression of pand Federal efforts to protect the pub­ deterrent. Deep-cruising nuclear submarines Lithuanians continue to reach the west. lic from pollutants and, at the same are out of dependable radio contact for hours time, assist industry in the cost of clean­ at a time. And there is always the posslbl11ty Yet in spite of political and cultural re­ of a breakthrough in Soviet antisubmarine pression and religious persecution, the ing up. The Clean Air Amendments, warfare capab111ties. Lithuanians' gallant spirit continues to which keep existing auto emission con­ Two corrective options are available. It is flourish. Dissidents continue to battle trol requirements in .the interests of possible to reduce, at least for awhile, the for their basic human rights at great energy conservation and employment, vulnerab111ty of this country's land-based personal risk and struggle to keep com­ exempt California from the act, allow­ deterrent by building new, semlmobile MX munications open to the west. ing our State to set the highest standards missiles that would be harder for the Rus­ in the Nation. sians to hit. And existing B-25s could be con­ As a Nation which was founded on verted to carry long-range cruise missiles the primacy of individual liberties and Aside from its effort to cut the cost of that could be fired at Soviet targets from rights basic to all men, the United States Government, Congress furthered its well outside Russian borders. must not forget the plight of Lithuanians stimulus to business by the passage of Leaving aside the cost and effectiveness and the millions of others silenced by the Tax Reduction and Simplification controversies that surround each of these Soviet oppression. The United States Act, which provides hiring incentives and June .15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19319 continues certain tax cuts for small busi­ PhUadelphia Yearly Meeting of the the day when there will be "rebirth of nesses. Rellgious Society of Friends calls on elected omcials: freedom in Lithuania, and Lithuanians More than two-thirds of the question­ To act under existing legislation to end will again be a part of the free world. naire respondents indicated that insuffi­ all aid, credits, and guarantees to any govern­ The text of the resolution follows: cient retirement income was the greatest ment which practices torture or prolonged PRisONERS OF CONSCIENCE PATRIOTS FOB problem facing our senior citizens. Fi­ detention without charges or other flagrant HUMAN RIGHTS nancing the social security system is the denials of 111e, Uberty, or security of the Political repression, religious persecution, subject of committee hearings now. While person, unless such aid directly benefits cultural genocide, deportation to Siberia social security, from its inception, was needy persons; and the denial of basic human rights-these meant only to supplement regular retire­ To amend the Food for Peace Law to as­ are the indignities su1fered by the Lithuan­ sure that U.S. food aid is sent to countries i-an people over the last 37 years at the hands ment income, Congress has recognized with such repressive governments only U it of their Communist occupiers, the Soviet that many persons are not eligible for directly benefits needy people; Union. pensions because of their particular job, To direct U.S. representatives to Interna­ Lithuanians have not su1fered in sUence. mobility, or inability to contribute finan­ tional lending institutions to vote against The Western World has seen and hears of cially. Generous tax deductions now pro­ economic aid to repressive governments un­ the many sacrifices of Lithuanian patriots vide an incentive to persons setting up less such aid directly benefits needy people. for human rights, despite attempts by the individual retirement acccunts. Soviet Union to suppress all such communi­ cations with the Western World. The under­ I think the 95th Congress, only 6- ground publications, ..The Chronicle of the months old, is meeting its responsibilities ANNIVERSARY OF LITHUANIAN Lithuanian Cathollc Church" and "Ausr-a" head on, and I would like to share with OCCUPATION (The Dawn), are published and disseminated my colleagues the opinions of my con­ by Lithuanians, 1n spite of the constant stituents: threat of arrest a.nd imprisonment by their ( 1) In your opinion, what is the most press- Russian occupiers. Indeed, Russian prisons HON. MATTHEW J. RINALDO are filled with such prisoners of conscience. ing problem before Congress? OJ' NEW JERSEY Energy, 31 percent. The Soviet Union has blatently ignored Unemployment, 17 percent. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES the human rights provision of its own con­ stitution, the provisions for human rights in Big Government, 27 percent. Wednesday, June 15, 1977 Crime, 21 percent. the Charter, and most re­ Other, 4 percent. Mr. RINALDO. Mr. Speaker, I have re­ cently it has ignored the implementation of (2) The Defense budget has been steadily quested this time today to join with my the provisions of the Final Act of Helsinki. increasing. Do you favor: colleagues and Americans of Lithuanian Lithuania, a sovereign nation since 1251, Continuing increases, 36 percent. established its independence on February 16, descent in observing the 37th anniver­ 1918, but was invaded and occupied by the Holding the line, 46 percent. sary of the occupation of Lithuania by CUtting back, 18 percent. Soviet Union on June 15, 1940, and subse­ (3) Do you favor the death penalty? Soviet troops. . quently, more than 300,000 freedom-loving Yes, 84 percent. The fate of Lithuania provides us with Lithuanians were deported to Siberian Don't know, 1 percent. living testimony of the worthlessness of forced-labor camps. These tragic events are No, 15 percent. Soviet promises. Though the Soviet con­ commemorated by Lithuanians throughout the Free World on June 15th. (4) Air and water pollution controls should sitution provides for individual liber­ be: This summer, the United States will be ties and the Soviet Union has agreed to attending the follow-up Conference on Eu­ Continued, 45 percent. the Final Act at Helsinki, the Communist Relaxed, 12 percent. ropean Security and Cooperation in Belgrade, Strengthened, 43 percent. dictatorship in Moscow has steadfastly Yugoslavia. The people of Lithu-ania are (5) Business ca.n be stimulated best by: denied independence to Lithuania. In­ anxiously awaiting the outcome of the Bel­ Cutting regulations, 32 percent. stead, it has engaged in systematic per­ grade Conference, because it represents the Providing tax incentives, 25 percent. secution of dissidents and a totalitarian only foreseeable means for them to benefit Balancing the budget, 43 percent. from the provisions of the Final Act of the repression of religious, political, and civil European Security and Cooperation Confer­ (6) What do you see as the major problem rights to the Baltic nations. From 1944 to ence 1n Helsinki. facing senior citizens? 1952, over 50,000 Lithuanian freedom Health and nutrition, 13 percent. There is world-wide concern for Soviet Retirement income, 68 percent. fighters lost their lives trying to return Jewry, and justly so, however, Lithuanians, Housing, 10 percent. freedom to Lithuania. Latvians, Estonians and the people of the Other, 9 percent. The Helsinki accord does not legitimize other Captive Nations also deserve our con­ the annexation of Lithuania. The United cern, and action. The Belgrade Conference presents a States has consistently refused to recog­ Unique opportunity to bring the force of nize the overthrow of the legitimate worid public opinion and the diplomatic PHILADELPHIA YEARLY MEETING Lithuanian Government, and we should power of the Western World to bear on the OF RELIGIOUS SOCIETY OF continue to support Lithuanians in their Soviet Union's disregard of the human rights FRIENDS SPEAKS OUT ON HUMAN efforts to throw off the shackles of com­ provisions of the Final Act of Helslnki. The RIGHTS ISSUE munism. Commission on Security and Cooperation in I Europe, established by the United States have introduced legislation-House Congress last year, has documented evidence Concurrent Resolution 235-which calls of the Soviet Union's non-compliance with HON. JOSHUA EILBERG upon U.S. representatives to the Belgrade these provisions. OJ' PENNSYLVANIA conference to confront the Soviet Union We urge the President of the United States, with its noncompliance with the Helsinki and the Secretary of State to direct our rep­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES accord. A1s one of the most important resentatives to the Belgrade Conference to Wednesday, June 15, 1977 foreign policy issues facing up today, I confront the Soviet Union about their non­ compliance and evidence of bad faith. Since Mr. En.BERG. Mr. Speaker, the urge my colleagues to join with me in pressing for adoption of my r~olution. the Soviet Union seeks better relations with Philadelphia yearly meeting of the the Western World for its own purposes, let Religious Society of Friends-Quakers­ Mr. Speaker, the United States cannot us make compliance with the Final Act of has spoken out in a very forthright and afford to be passive in its relations with Helsinki a condition on which those relations commendable manner on the issue of the Soviet Union: we must forcefully depend. human rights around the globe. support the captive nations and apply pressure to Russian leaders to live up A1s a long-time supporter of efforts to LITHUANIAN INDEPENDENCE secure for all peoples the basic right to to the Helsinki pact. which, as human beings, they are en­ I would like to include with my re­ titled, I am proud to place in the RECORD marks a copy of a position paper I have HON. JOHN D. DINGELL the following text of the resolution which received from the Lithuanian-American OJ' MICHIGAN th€y have adopted: Community of the United States. This IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES document succinctly and forcefully ex­ Holding that U.S. trade and aid pollcies Wednesday, June 15, 1977 should be 1n harmony with a deep concern presses the views of Americans of Lithu­ for the observance of human rights through­ anian descent, and I agree wholeheart­ Mr. DINGELL. Mr.. Speaker, today, out the world: edly with their goals. I look forward to Lithuanian-Americans join in com- 19320 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 memorating the military occupation and age in the United States who have diabetes. newal, and strengthening. In other areas, forcible incorporation of Lithuania into As you know, the ingestion of soft drinks l8 such as southern Africa and the Mideast, he a key element of the llfe-style of youngsters has made changes in emphasis as well as the Soviet Union in 1940. It is a most in the U.S.A. today. If saccharin 1s removed major modifications In previous baste policy. timely observation in that worldwide at­ from soft drinks, then diabetic chlldren will In a speech on May 22nd, In which he dealt tention is focusing on the issue of human be tempted to practices which w111 have a broadly with foreign policy, he set forth rights. At this moment, a meeting is con­ very adverse effect on their blood sugar con­ these "five cardinal premises:" vening in Belgrade for review of the trol. This concern can be appreciated if one . "First, our policy should reflect our peo­ Helsinki Accords, pledging respect for recognizes that a normal person whose blood ple's basic commitment to promote the cause fundamental human rights. sugar is 100 mg. per 100 ml. of blood has a of human rights. The tragedy of suppression of inde­ total blood glucose of about 20 grams. An 8- "Next, our pollcy should be based on close ounce soft drink contains about 30 grams of cooperation among the industrial democra­ pendence and expression of individual sugar. A normal chUd has the Insulin secret­ cies of the world-because we share the same rights is well recorded in Lithuania's ing capacity to metabolize this sugar load. values and because together we can help to history. The brutal occupation of the A diabetic chUd clearly does not and the in­ shape a more decent Ufe for all. 1940's infticted indelible scars on a proud gestion of one Coke, for instance, carries "Based on a strong defense capabllity, our and once free people. The indignities with It the acute risk of marked increases in pollcy must also seek to Improve relations were immense and the suffering im­ the blood sugar and a resurgence of the signs with the Soviet Union and with China. In measurable. People were gagged, dragged and symptoms of poor blood sugar control. ways that are both more comprehensive and The chronic effects of several soft drinks per more reciprocal. Even If we cannot heal ideo­ in chains, and separated from loved week may have disastrous consequences In logical divisions, we must reach accommoda­ ones. Churches and schools were trans­ terms of mobidlty and mortality for the tions that reduce the risk of war. formed into concentration camps and juvenile-type diabetic. "Also, our pollcy must reach out to the many died or were maimed both physi­ For the nondiabetic the ingestion of one developing nations to alleviate suffering and cally and emotionally. 8-ounce sugar containing drink dally con­ to reduce the chasm between the world's rich But, despite this travesty of justice sists of a caloric load of about 120 calories and poor. and its perpetuation over many years, with the potential for the gain of one pound "Finally, our policy must encourage all the Lithuanian people have remained every month or ten to twelve pounds per year. countries to rise above narrow national in­ If we really are concerned about the $140 terests and work together to solve such formi­ strong in their determination for a free billion that Is spent annually for health dable global problexns as the threat of nu­ tomorrow. Thein remains a vision of care, and recognize that over half of this clear war, racial hatred, the arms race, en­ hope-a hope for freedom denied a great expenditure is to treat Ufe-style related dis­ vironmental damage, hunger and disease." nation far too long. orders of which obesity, alcohol abuse, and This all sounds fine. But implementation The cause of human rights will not cigarette smoking account for the major por­ is, of course, the crucial test. rest until it is realized by all peoples. It tion, the Congress w111 rescind the Delaney Although, almost instinctively, most Amer­ is symbolic in this commemoration for Amendment and give its attention to the real icans like Mr. Carter's primary emphasis on Lithuanian nationhood, which is ob­ hazards to the health of Americans. human rights, adverse reactions have come I trust these comments w111 be of value 1n from friend and foe. served throughout the free world. your deliberations. In some European countries, government Sincerely, officials have expressed concern that the JoHN A. GALLOWAY, strong public drumming on human rights M.D., F.A.C.P.. Associate Professor o/ will cause more harm than good for the peo­ ON SACCHARIN BAN Medicine, Indiana University School ple under authoritarian regimes in general of Medicine; Member Board of Direc­ and tn eastern Europe in particular. tors, American Diabetes Association; And governments which have long been Immediate Past President, Indiana especially friendly with our country, such HON. ELWOOD HILLIS Diabetes Association. as Brazil, have turned critical or reacted OF INDIANA harshly to the Carter Administration's publlc IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES castigating of them over human rights. The Soviets, particularly, have responded Wednesday, June 15, 1977 CARTER'S EMERGING FOREIGN sharply. They have stepped up their prop­ aganda against our government's policies Mr. HILLIS. Mr. Speaker, I am sub­ POLICY and against Presldent Carter personally. mitting today a copy of a letter which I They have also Increased their repression have rceived from Dr. John A. Gallo­ of dissidents in Russia. And they have been way concerning another one of the prob­ HON. ROBERT J. LAGOMARSINO especially hard-nosed in strategic arms lems which will be present if saccharin OF CALIFORNIA negotiations. · is banned as an artificial sweetener in Now this Soviet reaction may not be bad. IN THE HOUSE OF ~RESENTATIVES soft drinks. I wanted all of my constitu­ For one thing, it 1s causing a more serious Wednesday, June 15, 1977 look than has been recently taken by most ents to be able to have the benefit of Dr. of us at the nature of the Soviet regime and Galloway's opinion on this matter: Mr. LAGOMARSINO. Mr. Speaker, I the implications of their on-going heavy AMERICAN DIABETES ASSOCIATION, would like to bring to the attention of my arms buildup. INDIANA AFFILIATE, INC. colleagues the following column by my In the broader world context, though, Sec­ May 10, 1977. constituent, Gen. Henry Huglln. General retary of State Vance wisely said in April: Hon. ELWOOD H. "BUD" HILLIS, "In pursuing a. human rights policy, we must Rayburn House Offtce Butld:tng, Huglin is a retired Air Force brigadier general and syndicated columnist. He always keep in mind the limits of our power Washington, D.C. and of our wisdom. . .. A sure fonnula for DEAR MR. HILLIS: I was pleased for the op­ comments on the questions of idealism defeat of our goals would be a rigid, hubris­ portunity of discussing with you a number versus pragmatism in President Carter's tic attempt to impose our values on others." of issues on the occasion of the kick-off foreign policy. Yet. our government's poUctes relative to brealtfast for the Kokomo fund-raising drive The article follows: for the Indiana Affiliate of the American southern Africa, in particular, seem to fly in Diabetes Association on Saturday, April 30. CARTER'S EMERGING FOREIGN POLICY the face of Mr. Vance's sensible points. I am writing now to state the specifics of my (By Henry Huglln) In Africa, the Administra tlon 1s certainly concern about the effect of banning sac­ To the surprise of most people, President selectively intruding into the internal affairs charin from use in soft drinks. The starting Carter has devoted a great deal of attention of Rhodesia and South Africa and trying to point for the views stated below 1s the fact and action to foreign affairs. This 1s good, as impose our values on them. But the Admin­ that there are no data whatsoever to demon­ foreign and domestic policy and action are tstratio:n. is not paying much attention to strate that saccharin Is~ carcinogenic in increasingly two sides of the same coin of the grave human rights violations in some humans. our national well-being. of the other African nations--or in China., In the discussions on saccharin which have What is emerging 1s a Carter foreign pol­ or Cuba. or Vietnam. been reported in the news media, 11 ttle or no icy based on an unusual amount of idealis­ President Carter and his Administration attention has been given to the plight of the tic moralism, which needs to be tempered st111 have a way to go to sort out feasible for­ diabetic of school age should saccharin be with more pragmatism. eign affairs pollcies and actions that wlll be removed from soft drinks. According to the In some areas, such as our alliances with most effective. report of the National Diabetes Commission Japan and with our NATO partners, Mr. Over-zealousness on such areas as human there are nearly 100,000 ·children of school Carter has wisely emphasized continuity, re- rights and control of nuclear weapons and June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19321 nuclear energy can lead to unfortunate con­ State to press vigorously in all current and Arthur Upton) sponsored by the Ford sequences for our basic national interests and and forthcoming talks with the signa­ Foundation and administered by the MITRE the best interests of other peoples of the tories of the Helsinki accords for con­ Corporation (Ball1nger Publishing Company, world as well. tinued improvement in the political and 1977, 418 pages). But the President has sometimes shown a Even 1! several of this book's 21 authors st rong streak of tough-minded pragmatism. human rights of all unjustly repressed had not accepted influential positions in the Th is w111 likely come to the fore as he has persons and groups in the Soviet Union. Carter administration since completing their to deal with hard foreign a!fairs choices. On this 37th anniversary of the Soviet work on the project, and even 1! the prin­ So, for au the idealistic moralizing, Presi­ Union's brutal attack on Lithuania, it is cipal recommendations made in the book dent Carter w111 probably ease into a middle­ perhaps the most fitting tribute that I had not become presidential policy within of-the-road position in the implementation can pay. weeks of the book's publication, it would of his foreign policy, as have all Presidents still be required reading for anyone with a since World War II-generally applying the serious interest in U.S. energy policy. As itt is, adage President Theodore Roosevelt recom­ A REVIEW OF THE FORD/MITRE NPIC (to which the acronym-addicted en­ mended: "Speak softly and carry a big ergy policy community doubtless will com­ stick." Let's hope so. STUDY ON NUCLEAR POWER press the book's unwieldy title) commands immediate attention beside Amory Lovins' "Energy Strategy: The Road Not Taken" as HON. GEORGE E. BROWN, JR. one of the new local points of The Great THE 37TH ANNIVERSARY OF SOVIET OF CALIFORNIA Energy Debate. IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Like the President's energy plan itself, the OCCUPATION OF LITHUANIA-WHY? book contains so much more that is reason­ Wednesday, June 15, 1977 able and right than is questionable or ob­ Mr. BROWN of California. Mr. jectionable, and represents so substantial a HON. J. HERBERT BURKE Speaker, the debate over the Clinch River step forward in what for want of a better OF FLORIDA term I will call "establishment analysis" of fast breeder reactor project has fre­ the energy problem, that I am almost reluc­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES quently focused on the fact that Presi­ tant to make any criticisms at all. Better a Wednesday, June 15. 1977 dent Carter's position is a reversal of loud hurrah for both the book and the Presi­ President Ford's position. This is not dent's energy plan, so that no on e m ay sup­ Mr. BURKE of Florida. Mr. Speaker, significant in itself, given the nature of pose that progress is unappreci8ited. In this right now the United States is participat­ politics, but the focus on President Car­ spirit, I shall begin by recording some of ing in a conference at Belgrade, to es­ ter's decision to defer the Clinch River the book's considerable merits. tablish an agenda for a serious discus­ breeder reactor project obscures the fact The authors of NPIC obviously were aware sion of the results of the Helsinki that many other groups and individuals that the issues surrounding nuclear power accords. There are so many individual are woven tightly into the fabric of the have also reconsidered their earlier, broader energy situation, and that it would and group concerns about denial of hu­ short-lived support of this phase of the not be possible to carry out their stated task man rights by the Soviet Union which fast breeder reactor research, develop­ of taking a "fresh and independent look at could be discussed, violations of Basket ment, and demonstration program. the role nuclear power should play in the m of the accords which could be raised, One of the reports which supports the United States and the rest of the world in with the Soviets, that I hesitate to single President's position is the Ford/Mitre this century" without looking at oil, coal, out any person or group for particular study, "Nuclear Power: Issues and conservation, and a good many other things attention. Yet every case like Anatoly Choices." I have previously placed some as well. The pitfall that accompanies this Scharansky is a painful example of what recognition is that the scope of such a study of the findings of this study in the CoN­ may expand out of control--everything being the accords were supposed to accomplish GRESSIONAL RECORD, and WOuld strongly connected to everything else-untll it en­ and did not. Every time we recall the recommend to my colleagues that they compasses the entire indigestible corpus of brave peoples who live under Soviet rule, take time to read this report. However, the human predicament. These authors, how­ \ denied self-determination, we are clearly knowing that most of my colleagues will ever, avoided the pitfall with grace and dex­ reminded that there is a shameful gap not have time to do. so, I would like to ter! ty, managing in a book of 400 pages to between Soviet law and practice. recommend that my colleagues at least 1lluminate most of the essential threads of the nuclear debate while avoiding matters In this connection, Mr. Speaker, I can­ take the time to read a recent book review of marginal relevance and not belaboring not fall to join in commemoration of a. of this Ford/Mitre study. This review some others that are relevant but too clouded day of infamy, June 15, 1940, when the summarizes the key points of this study, by uncertainties to repay exhaustive treat­ sovereign State of Lithuania was invaded which the reviewer claims "provides some ment. by the Soviet Union. Lithuania's position intellectual underpinning for Carter's The organization of the book is excellent. as an unwilling part of the U.S.S.R. is a energy program." It begins with a lucid overview of about 40 modern monument to that day 37 years· Mr. Speaker, since the Committee on pages, summarizing all of the Study Group's ago. Lithuania does not suffer alone, Mr. Science and Technology has rejected the principal conclusions on the issues relevant to policy. The remainder of the boo~ is Speaker; Latvia and Estonia also wait position of the administration, I will be divided into four parts. patiently for a day when they can enjoy offering an amendment on the House Part I, Energy Economics and Supply, cov­ the rights guaranteed by a constitution :floor supporting President Carter's posi­ ers the relation between energy and eco­ which the Soviets imposed by force, or tion on the Clinch River breeder reactor nomic prosperity, the supplies of uranium those called for in the accords reached project. The review, which I will insert and fossil fuels, the comparative economics by the Conference on Security and Co­ in the REcoRD, explains some of the of light water reactors and coal-fired power operation in Europe at Helsinki. But to­ backnound of this debate: plants, and an introduction to alternatives day is Lithuania's infamous anniversary. to fossll fuel and nuclear fission, including [From the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, solar energy, fusion, and energy conserva­ And how ironically apt that prepara­ June 1977] tions are underway for a discussion of tion. A STRATEGY TO BUY TIME-NEW POLICY STUDY Part ll, Health, Environment and Safety, those accords, while thousands of PROVIDES SoME INTELLECTUAL UNDERPINNING covers nuclear accident risks, radioactive­ Lithuanians throughout the free world FOR CARTER'S ENERGY PROGRAM waste management, and routine risks to are joining in spirit with their relatives (Reviewed by John P. Holdren) health and environment posed by generation and friends in their Soviet-dominated Nuclear Power: Issues and Choices, Report of electricity with uranium and coal. homeland to remember how the long of the Nuclear Energy Policy Study Group Part III treats Nuclear Proliferation and night of oppression began. (Spurgeon M. Keeny, Jr., Chairman; Seymour Terrorism. Mr. Speaker, this body went on record Abrahamson, Kenneth J. Arrow, Harold Part IV, Issues for Decision, applies the in­ on December 2, 1975, with H.R. 864, as Brown, Albert Carnesale, Abram Chayes, formation developed in Parts I to ill, plus clearly refusing to recognize the force­ Holl1s, B. Chenery, Paul Doty, Phlllp J. Far­ additional descriptive material, data, and ley, Richard L. Garwin, Marvin L. Goldberger, argumentation ~ needed, to develop recom­ able incorporation of the Baltic Repub­ Carl Kaysen, Hans H. Landsberg, Gordon J. mendations on what the U.S. policy should lics into the Soviet Union. I take this MacDonald, Joseph S. Nye, Wolfgang K. H. be concerning plutonium reprocessiilg and highly appropriate opportunity today to Panofsky, Howard Raiffa, George W. Rath­ recycle, breeder reactors, uranium enrich­ urge the President and the Secretary of Jens, John C. Sawhill, Thomas C. Schelling, ment, and exports of nuclear technology. 19322 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 The book evidently was written to be un­ confidence that there is no direct relation­ ClinCih River liquid metal fast breeder re­ derstandable to intelligent lay persons, and ship between energy costs and the number actor demonstration project; in this respect I suspect it has succeeded ad­ of jobs ... The same processes that have ad­ Call for a two to three year moratorium mirably. There is a compact appendix intro­ justed the economy to technological change by all nuclear-supplier nations on exports ducing the elementary technology and ter­ should respond to energy scarcities without of technology for enrichment of u ranium minology of the nuclear fuel cycle for those significant increases in unemployment." and for reprocessing of reactor fuel, during without prior exposure to it, and the authors On Conservation (p. 147) : "Conservation which time an intensive reexaintnation of have done an uncommonly thorough job of is one of the most effective means of making proliferation risks could take place; providing concise definitions of needed tech­ avallable additional energy to produce de­ Expand domestic uranium-enrichment ca­ nical terms and concepts as they arise in the sired goods and services." pacity, partly to help the United States con­ development of the argument. (Explanatory On nuclear power as insurance against sup­ tribute to the establishment of a stable and footnotes as well as those supplying refer­ ply disruptions (p. 15): "Whlle substantial reliable world xna.rket in low-enriched urani­ ences are at the bottoms of the pages, spar­ changes in energy prices can be accommo­ um for use in light water reactors (on terms ing the reader a constant scramble for the dated in the long run, sudden stoppages or attractive enough to discourage adoption of end of the chapter of the back of the book.) sharp increases can indeed force temporary indigenous reprocessing and enrichment ca­ The reader will discover the meaning of cutbacks in industiral operations with at­ pacity in nations not now possessing it); "forward cost" of uranium resources, the dif­ tendant unemployment and hardship . . . . Develop technology for interim manage­ ference between "fault trees" and "event The amount of nucle9.r power available w111 ment and then perxna.nent storage of unre­ trees" in analysis of reactor-accident prob­ ha7o little to do with the cause, severity, or processed radioactive wastes (that is, spent abilities, and the much-abused subleties in duration of such events." fuel), and, if it seems necessary to serve non ­ the definition of "capacity factor" of nuclear On the Rasmussen report (p. 18) : "Al­ proliferation objectives, otter to take back and coal-fired power plants, for example, though W ASH-1400 is a valuable resource for spent fuel from other nations for storage; much more quickly and surely here than ln the study of the safety problem, we believe Seek a 15-year moratorium on the use of the original literature. that it seriously underestimates uncertain­ "peaceful nuclear explosives,'' which pose In fact, the clarity of the exposition and ties and has methodological flaws that are proliferation problems far out of proportion the extensive use of recent relevant data discussed in our report." to their potential benefits; would make this a better book from which On the usab111ty of plutonium from ltght Urge our industrialized allies, insofar as to teach an introductory course about con­ water reactors for weapons (pp. 331-332): possible, to adopt simllar policies. temporary energy problems than most texts "Earlier, it was believed that reactor-grade It is important to emphasize that the Study designed for that purpose. At the same time, plutonium would be unsuitable for weapons Group does not recommend abandoning the the pedagogical material has been introduced because of the presence of the isotope plu­ breeder option (nor does President Carter in with sufficient grace and economy of style tonium-240. This isotope, which c!ln poten­ his proposed energy program) . NPIC argues, that it does not seem overly intrusive to the tially lead to disruptive preinitiation of a and President Carter does not appear to dis­ specialist reading the book for its policy con­ weapon, 1s now not regarded as a prohibitive agree, that it is conceivable this country and tent. In all, this is the best written book I barrier to successful weapons ptoduction." the world will need plutonium breeders even­ have ever encountered that was produced by On existing safeguards against nuclear tually as a long-term energy source, and that a committee. terrorism (p. 302, p. 311): "As presently op­ the option should be kept alive for now as a The deliberations of the Nuclear Policy erated, the security system even in the Amer­ hedge against the possibility that more agree­ Study Group and the production of this book ican nuclear industry does not appear ade­ able long-term sources turn out not to be were sponsored by the Ford Foundation quate to meet the potential threat of terror­ adequate. through a grant to the MITRE Corporation, ism .... The federal government appears to which managed the project. The work was The recommendations are based on the be poorly prepared to respond to an act or view, hcwever, that neither Clinch River nor carried out, according to the author's pref­ threat against a reactor or the theft of nu­ ace, without the intervention or Influence early plutonium recycle are needed to keep clear materials." the breeder option alive, and that a decel­ of either organization in matters of intel­ On the coal-nuclear comparison in terms lectual substance. The 21 participants were erated and more diverse breeder program has of health, environment, and safety (p. 17): few costs and many benefits (especially for chosen, writes McGeorge Bundy in his fore­ "The range of uncertainty in social costs 1s word, as individuals "highly qualified in their proliferation) compared to the path the so great that the balance between coal and country has been on until now. own fields of investigation and analysts" and nuclear power cou!d be tipped in either di­ "e~sentially open-minded on the general de­ rection with resolution of the uncertainties." In putting forward their proposals, the 1 bate raging around nuclear power." On the economic benefits of nuclear power Ford/MITRE authors make it perfectly clear No one is likely to argue much with the (p. 15): "Even with assumptions favorable that they are aware proliferation is a com­ first of these assessments, although some to nuclear power, the benefits from the con­ plex political problem-one for which there may question whether the national distribu­ tinued growth of light water reactors and can be no solution through technical fixes tion of highly qualified people really is such the early introduction· of the breeder are alone.. or through unilateral action by the as to require naming Harvard professors to very small in this century (a small fraction United States, and indeed for which there is fully a third of the 21 slots. of 1 percent of GNP), and only 1 or 2 percent no complete solution at all. They discuss the Institutional affiliations other than uni­ in the next century." alternative pathways to nuclear-weapons versities include the International Bank for On the timing of decisions about nuclear capab111ty outside commercial nuclear power, power (p. 4): "While nuclear power is one and they describe some political initiatives Reconstruction and Development, the Brook­ unrelated to nuclear power that the United ings Institution, and Resources for the Fu­ of the options that should be pursued, it is ture. The breakdown by disciplines was: eco­ not as critical to future economic develop­ States might take to relieve international nomics, law, and pollcy studies, 14; physics, ment as it advocates claim. There is there­ tensions in general and incentives toward 4; environmental and life sciences, 3. As for fore time to assess carefully the potential proliferation ln particular. openmindedness, environmentalists will risks as well as the benefits of nuclear power Their position is therefore not that manip­ probably find a pro-high-technology if not a and to avoid hasty and uncritical decisions." ulating nuclear power is the only way to in­ pro-nuclear leaning in prior position taken The central issues in U.S. nuclear policy, fluence proliferation, nor that stopping the by members of the Study Group, and ana­ as the Ford/MITRE Study Group sees them, spread or the evolution of nucle3r power lysts of m111t~ry nuclear policy wlll certainly involve proliferation of nuclear weapons and would stop proliferation. It is rather that find a pro-arms-control, anti-proliferation the potential influences of U.S. decision­ slowing the spread of the most "sensitive" leaning. making on that process. (Proliferation in this technologies (enrichment, reprocessing, context means the spread of nuclear-weapons breeders), and slowing the evolution of com­ CONCLUSIONS OF STUDY GROUP capab111ty among nations; the acquisition of mercial nuclear power toward plutonium­ What, then, were the conclusions of this suoh weapons by subnational groups is also based systems, can slow proliferation down. body? On a variety of important points, the given considerable attention in the book, but Theirs is, in other words, a time-buying strat­ conclusions are not new but are nevertheless the emphasis on the international dimen­ egy, and in a sensible world the time that is of great significance bec~use their endorse­ sion 1s much greater.) Based mainly on pro­ bought will be used to implement political ment here by authors of such impeccable liferation considerations, the authors suggest measures that can reduce more permanently credentials will do much to remove them that the United States should: the chance that nuclear weaoons will be used. from the realm of controversy. For example: Defer indefinitely domestic reprocessing of (If statesmen cannot or will not use the time On the relation of energy and GNP (p. 14): spent reactor fuel and the recycling of plu­ this way, we are all dead no matter what else "Although there has been historical correla­ tonium and, more specifically, not supply happens.) tion between energy and economic growth, federal assistance for the completion and Two questions about this sort of strategy there is no re3son to believe that the same operation of the Barnwell (South Caroldna) come immediately to mind. How much time relationship wm hold under conditions of reprocessing plant; can really be bought thereby? How expensive rising rather than falling energy prices." Postpone beyond the end of the century 1s the time that is bought? The NPIC au­ On energy prices and employment (pp. 48- any decision to commercialize the plutonium thors admit the answer to the first question 49) : "For the long run, we can only say with breeder reactor, and probably cancel the ts somewhat uncertain. Countries that want June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19323

nuclear bombs badly enough will get them It 1s on these three points that the main particular regions cannot be judged at this by an alternative route-production reac­ substantive attacks on the study by the nu­ time." tors or indigenous enrichment facllities spe­ clear community probably will focus. The first-order effects of both natural cli­ cifically for this purpose, for example. But URANIUM RESOURCES matic change and change induced by carbon­ these routes are expensive, slow, and obvious, dioxide bulld-up would not be the alteration magnifying a government's vulnerab111ty to With respect to uranium resources, the of mean global surface temperature but, internal dissent, external censure; or even supplies assumed in the economic mod­ rather, more complicated associated changes preemptive action. el's "base case" were 2.5 million tons of in patterns of circulation and precipitation. Possessing the appropriate indigenous nu­ uranium oxide at a production cost of $30 or Expecting these to cancel when natural and clear-power technologies, by contrast, legiti­ less per pound and 5.5 million tons at a anthropogenic influences are superimposed mates the development of a bomb-relevant production cost of $100 or less per pound. would be a bit like expecting two random technological base, greatly shortens the time These numbers are roughly consistent with malfunctions in the innards of a watch to between a decision to make bombs and ac­ those developed to date in ERDA's National counteract each other in a way that left tually having them, and increases the num­ Uranium Resource Evaluation Program its timekeeping abllity unchanged. The ber of bombs that can be produced in a (NURE), which include actual plus potential short-term effect on mankind of any non­ short time. It is these "attractive nuisance" reserves of 3.7 million tons at "forward costs" cancelling perturbations, moreover, is over­ characteristics of enrichment and reprocess­ below $30 per pound. Much lower estimates whelmingly likely to be negative, owing to ing technologies that suggest that slowing have been put forward by some other ana­ the adaption of existing agricultural systems their spread will slow proliferation signifi­ lysts, and it is fair to say that the question of to existing climatic conditions. uranium supply remains one of the most cantly. ENERGY CONSERVATION It is often argued that the United States controversial ingredients of the breeder can no longer have much infiuence over the debate. In the event that the Study Group 1s spread and character of nuclear power I believe the situation reflects a classic judged to have overestimated uranium re­ abroad, because other industrial nations will confrontation of the geologist's versus the sources, or to have been too sanguine about sell what the United States will not, and be­ economist's approach to resource estimation, the prospect..~ for expanding the use of coal, cause the incentives for developing countries the geologist deriving low figures from the it has left itself a comfortable, compensating to buy are so strong. The Ford/MITRE group, tangible but limited geologic evidence in cushion 1n its analysis of conservation. and evidently President Carter, reject that hand and the economist deriving much It assumed that energy use would increase view. The Study Group puts great weight on higher estimates from extrapolation and the in direct proportion to income 1! energy the potential infiuence of the United States expectation that higher prices will stimu­ prices stayed constant, probably an overly setting an example in deferring its own re­ late new discoveries. cautious assumption, 1n my view, in the face processing and breeder-deployment pro­ My own view is that the economist's view of trends toward miniaturization, toward grams. They write (p. 357) : 1s more reasonable early in the development more etnclent industrial processes, and from "The United States has played a major role history of a given mineral (as I would argue manufactured goods toward services (all of in shaping world expectations regarding is the case for uranium), whUe the geologist's which were underway before real energy l:'reeders and indeed, inspired many of the view 1s more realistic late in the development prices started to rise) . foreign breeder programs now underway. Re­ history (as I think is the case for oU) . This It assumed a "base case" price elasticity of demand for energy of 0.35--a reasonable fig­ examination of U.S. needs and estimates of view puts me in sympathy with the NPIC po­ what it is possible to do at economic advan­ sition (known to rest mainly on the analysis ure but one likely to prove low as more ex­ tage or low cost in delaying commitment to of Study Group member and Resources for perience with higher prices accumulates. a plutonium economy can still have an im­ the Future economist Hans Landsberg). At It assumed that only 3 percent of society's pact on decision processes in other coun­ the same time, I think the Study Group can capital stock can be adjusted each year to tries." fairly be faulted for not exploring more ex­ respond to energy-conserving opportunities. And on p. 381: plicitly the sensitivity of their conclusions And it gave little credit to energy conserva­ "Any U.S. proposal for international reex­ to the real uncertainty about who is right tion induced by factors other than price. amlna tion of the fuel cycle could hardly be concerning uranium. The Study Group explicitly acknowledged credible 1f the United States were forging I do not accept the view, put forward by that these assumptions tended to understate ahead with its own plans for reprocessing some breeder proponents, that the most pru­ the potential of energy conservation; the fuel for LWSs and with its program for early dent course is always to formulate pollcy on authors chose not to take a stron•Jer position commercialization of the breeder reactor .... the basis of the minlmum resource estimate. on conservation because their conclusions all Other countries may not follow the U.S. lead, If the policies responsive to that minimum seemed robust enough with a moderate one. but most would at least reassess their own estimate have very high costs associated with Critics inclined to claim that the study's plans in the face of U.S. restraint." them, it ts not at all obvious that this is a assumptions were biased against nuclear The authors recognize that some countries prudent course. The saving grace in the pres­ power wlll have trouble with this point. I have stronger incentives than others to pro­ ent case 1s that a good deal more could be believe there is enough slack on the conser­ ceed with plutonium recycle and breeder re­ learned about uranium supply, by means of vation side to sustain the study's main con­ actors and, although they argue that the ra­ a vigorous program of resea.rch and explora­ clusions even with a considerable reduction tionale for developing countries to move in tion, in the space of perhaps five years--not in the ~sumed capab111ties in uranium and these directions is especially thin, they con­ a crucial loss even if the low estimates turned coal. cede that a strong U.S. example may not be out to be more nearly correct. My own principal criticism of NPIC is that as effective as they hope. Their position, it does not pursue its antiproliferation argu­ then, 1s not that the strategy they propose The coal alternative, too, is controversial. The Study Group envisions the possibllity of ment quite far enough. I find very compell­ is a foolproof means of buying time agaJ.ru;t ing the arguments adduced in NPIC and proliferation, but rather that it will probably a quadrupling of 1975 U.S. annual produc­ tion of 600 million tons by the year 2000, a elsewhere about the unsuitab111ty of nuclear work to some extent and that the cost of power for meeting the energy needs of most finding out is low. prospect that makes many other analysts queasy. The authors concede that such a developing countries. Nuclear power, even The Study Group's view of the low cost of role for coal would require "more etncient Wzht water reactors using low-enriched time bought by their prescriptions is based mining technology, improved transportation uranium with no reprocessing, is economic largely on an economic analysis of the bene­ systems, better control of sulfur oxides and only in large units, demanding of indige­ fits of early breeder-reactor com.rnercializa­ other emissions, radically improved long­ nous technical sophistication, vulnerable, tion, described in Chap. 12. The conclusion distance electrical transmission, and devel­ unforgiving, and produces only electricity. of that analysis that the benefits (and hence opment of more etncient, lower cost synthetic Most needs in the developing countries are the costs of delav) are small rests, in turn. gas and au conversion." While admitting this for nonelectric enel"6Y and, whether electric on three propositions: is a big order, they suggest that according or not, for technologies that are sturdy, eas­ That enough uranium 1s available in the coal research and development a national ily repaired by local talent, and deployable United States at reasonable cost to support priority equivalent to that which nuclear in dispersed units of modest size. expanded domestic rellance on llght water power has enjoyed could probably accom­ I would therefore rather have seen the reactors and a sisznificant quantity of low­ plish it. They may be right, but I am per­ Study Group explore more thoroughly the enriched uranium for export; sonally nervous that we may get the coal merits of a U.S. position against export of That the coal alternative to nuclear power without getting the envnonmental-control nonbreeder reactors as well as against that can not only be relied upon but can be ex­ improvements needed to go with it. of more "sensitive" technologies. Such a po­ panded rapidly; I also belleve the Study Group has under­ sition would have compelled more attention That economic, price-induced energv con­ stated the carbon-dioxide-and-climate prob­ to the important question of what tech­ servation can reduce the growth of demand lem, in concluding ( p. 20) : "Whether the nical assistance better suited than nuclear !or energy in general and electricity in par­ impacts of carbon dioxide will combine with reactors to the needs of developing ticular to well below traditional .. business natural changes in climate to the net dis­ countries the United States might be as usual" forecasts. advantage or advantage of mankind or to able to provide. And it would have cxxm--1216--Part 16 19324 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 confronted more squarely what I think may his family. We also were aware of the port. This report, written by bank be the real Achllles heel of the Ford/MrrRE great satisfaction he derived from both economist Alan Reynolds underscores position-namel'Y, that developing countries of those interests. With all of their ac­ the need for a major reevaluation of our are unlikely to be more enthusiastic about complishments he and his lovely wife, Federal funding formulae and their re­ dependence on industrial nations for en­ riched uranium than they are about de­ Mary, .took the greatest pride in the ac­ liance upon a simpUstic interpretation pendence on OPEC for oil, and that posses­ complishments of their children, Mildred of existing income data. The message in sion of light water reactors will therefore and Ramsey. Mr. Reynolds' analysis is clear: Adjust­ prove to be a strong inducement to develop His family have our condolences, but ments for regional cost of living are ab­ indigenous enrichment capacity as soon as I know they derive great comfort out of solutely essential if we are to truly target they are able. the achievements of his remarkable ca­ Federal funds to areas of need. Some may also argue that NPIC should reer. We, his friends, his fellow Texans, For the benefit of my colleagues, the have e.xplored the implications for the and all Americans share their grief and American Political Report's summary of United States of centralized versus decen­ Mr. Reynolds' report follows: tralized and electric versus nonelectric pat­ their pride as we reflect on the life of terns of do:rnestic energy development. I Justice Tom C. Clark. BUSINESS POLITICS: THE IMPLICATIONS OF think this would be carping; the study was SHIJ'TING U.S. INCOME GEOGRAPHY supposed to draw conclusions from avail­ New state-by-state income data suggests able information and analysis, not explore that politicians and businessmen can look entirely new ground. There is always more for more actions like the Senate's June 7 to do. NEW YORK AND ALABAMA: PART­ vote to tnt federal urban aid to the North­ The book contains remarkably few factual NERS IN POVERTY east and Midwest. Meanwhile, though, t h is errors; I found only two. The statement (p. same data--drawn from analyses by Chicago 201) that "the amount of solar energy inter­ Bank economist Alan Reynolds in the "First Chicago World Report"-5hows just how cepted by the entire earth's surface andre­ HON. MICHAEL HARRINGTON much ground the old Northern industrial turned to the atmosphere averages 341 watts OJ' MASSACHUSETTS per square meter" is incorrect. The figure states have been losing. given 1s the average short-wave energy inci­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVEO The stunning message of Reynolds' South dent at the top of the atmosphere, and only Wednesday,. June 15, 1977 versus North figures lies in how the Nort h­ about half as much penetrates clouds, dust, ern lead in nominal (unadjusted) per capita and atmospheric gases to reach the surface. Mr. HARRINGTON. Mr. Speaker, over income fades to nothing or a defi cit when The five-year Non-Proliferation Treaty Re­ the past several months we have wit­ adjusted for the purchasing power impact of view Conference (p. 288) was held in 1975, nessed a growing interest in, and sensi­ local living costs, state and local taxes and not 1973. tivity to the special economic dimculties (nominal income-related) federal tax • • • • • of particular regions of the country. To brackets. Nuclear Power; Issues and Choices is, by ·a large degree, the debate over regional Real disposable income by State (1975) any yardstick, a major contribution to the economic trends has been constructive, Snow Belt: · Income 1 Income 2 energy debate. I think it has irreversibly for it has focused attention on deeply Connecticut ------$6, 973 $4,254 moved the middle-of-the-road position, in rooted economic problems which, until Massachusetts ------6, 114 3, 166 the spectrum of views about nuclear energy now, this body has failed to address. Rhode Island.______5, 841 3, 535 policy, a large step to the lett. And one does Maine------4,786 3,244 not have to agree with all its conclusions to There has, however, been a negative side New Hampshire______6, 315 3,293 effect as well. Some of the debate has recognize that the document is painstaking­ Vermont ------4,960 3, 132 ly researched, superbly organized, cogently descended into an atmosphere of re­ New York______6, 564 3,493 argued, lucidly written. It, and the presiden­ gional mistrust and competition. Each Ne~ Jersey ______6,722 4,062 tial energy plan for which it provides much group has armed itself with a new bat­ Pennsylvania------5,943 3,870 intellectual underpinning, wm be much de• tery of selective and sometimes errone­ Ohio------5,810 3,973 bated in the coming months, including, un­ ous statistics to defend its own interests. Illlnois ------6, 789 4,404 fortunately, by people who have read neither. Perhaps, more than anything else, these Indiana------5,653 3,834 Read them both. It is time well spent. Michigan------6,173 3,945 squabbles have underscored our current Wisconsin ------5, 699 3,670 inabil1ty to accurately measure eco­ Florida ------5, 638 4, 122 nomic need. Georgia ------5, 086 3,795 In the fray, the essential concern N. Carolina----'-'------4, 952 3,738 JUSTICE TOM C. CLARK which motivates the regional spokes­ s. Carolina______4, 618 3,530 VJ,rginia -- ~ ------5, 785 4,105 people of the Northeast and Midwest has 3,692 been lost. That motivation is a deep ------4, 871 Tennes~ee ------4,895 3,704 BON. JACK BROOKS commitment to a healthy and balanced Alabama ------4,643 3,566 OJ' TEXAS national economy-one in which each Mississippi ------4,052 3, 109 3,745 IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES geographical area of the United States Arkansas------4,620 participates fully, both by making its Louisiana ------4, 904 3,663 Wednesday, June 15, 1977 own contribution and deriving its par­ Oklahoma ____ -::______5, 250 4,015 4,313 Mr. BROOKS. Mr. Speaker, last Sun­ ticular benefits. Texas------5,631 day night, Justice Tom C. Clark died. Over the past year or so, leaders in 1 Per capita, unadjusted. His death marked the end to a legal the Northeast and Midwest have at­ 2 Per capita, ad.fusted for local taxes, dif­ career that may well be unmatched in tempted to demonstrate that their re­ ferences in cost of living and per capita fed­ our history. gions no longer enjoy the economic eral taxes. Justice Clark came to Washington in stability which once allowed for a gen­ Reynolds bluntly says "Our calculations 1937 after having engaged in private erous exportation of their development indicate that real, after-tax incomes are now practice in Texas, Throughout his years capital. In fact, ample evidence exists to significantly lower in New York and Massa­ chusetts, t han in, say, Arkansa~ and Ala­ of legal practice he always combined a support the contention that the chief bama." With local cost-of-living and tax calm dignity with a profound sense of capital exporters of the past are now in factors the principal culprits, though, federal practical reality. In his public life, as serious need of the very same economic aid shifts may not have much impact . . . Assistant U.S. Attorney General, as U.S. assistance they once provided the less economics (the Britainization Attorney General, as Associate Justice developed regions of the South and of New England and New York) appear more of the Supreme Court, and finally as a Southwest. critical. senior judge, he was totally dedicated to Some other implications for business . . . The most recent and disturbing evi­ a larger-than-expected shift of real dispos­ the law, to justice, and to his country. dence of this economic reversal can be able income to the South and West; further Those of us who had the good fortune found in a report on geographic shifts in reinforcement of anti-welfare state business to know him personally can testify to the income issued by the First National Bank relocation factors (Northeast and Great Lakes depth of feeling he had for the two over­ of Chicago and summarized in the June states constitute the bulk of those where riding interests of his life-the law and 10 issue of the American Political Re- taxes are "high and rising" per the Advisory June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMAiq{S 19325

Commission on Intergovernmental Rela· WILDERNESS STUDY LEGISLATION be better able to assess the effect of the tions); and growing need to watch out for legislation upon the National Wilderness federal legislation like the just-introduced "National Employment Priorities Act" (see System and other public land uses. Christian Science Monitor, 6/7) designed to HON. MAX BAUCUS I enclose for the RECORD copies of let­ force relocation-minded corporations to sub­ 01' MONTANA ters which I have sent to Assistant Secre­ mit to investigation, hearings and possible IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES tary CUtler, his response, and supporting tax benefits loss. Wednesday, June 15, 1977 materials: Wilderness statistic8 Mr. BAUCUS. Mr. Speaker, I would NATIONAL INFAMOUS ANNIVERSARY OF like to share today with my colleagues LITHUANIAN REPRESSION some observations regarding our national Total wUderness now 1n forest public lands policy. During this system ------14, 903, 690 Congress, we will consider various pro­ MONTANA HON. JOHN J. RHODES posals which, if enacted, will set aside Total wllderness now clas- OF AJUZONA areas for wilderness study and possible s!fted 1D Monta.na______1, 966, 968 inclusion into the National Wilderness IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES System. Anaconda Pintlar------159,086 Wednesday, June 15, 1977 I am keenly interested in these wilder­ Bob Ma.rsha.ll------950,000 cabtnet Mountains ______94,272 Mr. RHODES. Mr. Speaker, 37 years ness study proposals because many of the Gates-ot-the-Mountalns ------28,562 ago the Russians overran and conquered potential study areas are in the congres­ Mission Mountains ______75,500 sional district which I represent. For the Lithuania. Since that time, the people Scapegoat ------­ 240,000 of that land have suffered repression and benefit of my colleagues, I include the Selway-Bltterroot (Montana. violation of their human rights. Many following information which I hope will only) ------419,648 be of assistance as the House considers have been deported to Siberian labor Total wUderness study camps. All have felt the deprivation of various wilderness study area proposals. areas 1D Montana______1, 823, 370 basic human rights and the loss of the The House Subcommittee on Public Lands will mark up H.R. 3454 on Thurs­ freedom that we here take so much for Selected d~g ~------1,353.024 granted. day, June 23. This bill w111 designate

Forests

Kootenai Flathead Beaverhead Bitterroot Custer Helena Dnrlodge Lolo Gallatin Total

Average cut, last 5 Y'--···------In. 6 134.2 18.5 35.6 2.1 18.3 26.5 131.3 17.7 561.8 High year·----·----·------·------(1971) 205.7 (1972) 156.4 (1973) 23.9 (1972) 45.6 (1972) 4. 7 (1974) 25.8 (1971) 39.2 (1972) 158. 1 (1972) 24.6 ------·----­ Low year·----··----·------·--·-- (1975) 142.3 (1975) 114.6 (1975) 12.4 (1975) 24.4 (1973) • 3 (1975) 10.1 (1975) 15.6 (1975) 110.2 (1975) 11.6 ---··----·---­ latest year.. •••..••.....•.•••.•••.• (1975) 142.3 (1975) 114. 6 (1975) 12.4 (1975) 24.4 . 7 (1975) 10.1 (1975) 15.6 (1975) 2 (1975) 6 ------····- Industry trend______(1) (1) (2) (1) (') (2) (1) no. n. Potential yield.----··------·-·---- 239.8 146.3 58.9 63.7 10.4 29.9 64.0 188~1l ~~l-·------uG.-5 Potential yield in roaded areas only.... 199.9 119.0 24.5 34.8 10.3 22.2 55.3 151. 1 41. 0 658. 1 4 4 4 8 ~~,i:t~~~iiailie--iT-roaiiiess·--a-reas- <> <5) <> (5) <'> <> <> (4) (•) ---··------·-- reserved. ___ .••• ______.•....• (7) (') (1) (7) (7) (1) (') Other considerations •. --·. ___ ._ •••• _. (O) ___ •• ____ ------____ •• -----••• ______-·-·. __ -----·· ___ ·------______••• _•• _ (7) (7) ··------··· (0) ------···--···-----·······--

• Declining. • Potential yield in roaded areas only is smaller than industrial use. Thus, if all roadless area 2 Stable. were reserved, industry would have to be reduced. a Downward. 8 Potential yield exceeds industrial consumption. No marginal lands would need to be used . • 4 Potential yield exceeds industrial needs. Some marginal lands may be needed; costs may be 1 None necessary. high. • 89 pet could be maintained. • Added pressure in roaded areas is possibility. 19326 EXTENSIONS OF. REMARKS June 15, 1977 U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, that I will be coming back to you and to the amount of approximately $35.6 million Washington, D.O., May 13, 1977. your colleagues in the Appropriations Com­ will be required to maintain the 1.1 b111ion Hon. M. RuPERT CUTLER, mittee to request the funds needed to en­ board feet program level. In order to achieve Assi stant Secretary for Conservation, Be­ hance production of both public and private a program offering the full potential yield search and Education, U.S. Department lands of the needed balance o! both goods (maximum allowable harvest) level of 1.8 of Agriculture, Washington, D.O. and services." blllion board feet, timber management DEAR SECRETARY CUTLER: I am writing to Another area I woula like to explore with funding would need to be Increased approxi­ ·request your immediate assistance in con­ you in our meeting is the extent to which mately $14.4 million to a level of about $50 nection with two wilderness bllls that directly roadless areas have been studied by the For­ million. affect my legislative district. Le.st week you est Service. In youl' prepared testimony sub­ You inquired about the status of wilder­ testified before a House Interior Subcom­ mitted to Chairman Roncallo, you noted ness studies !or areas in H.R. 3454 and S. mittee in connection with H.R. 3454, the En­ that the Forest Service bas carefully con­ 393-11 areas in total. Of the 11 areas, only dangered American Wilderness Act of 1977. sidered the status and condition of variety two Involve Forest Service designated wilder­ In that testimony, you expressed the Ad­ of wilderness areas. As you know, there are ness study areas. In 1973, we designated the ministration's support for inst ant wilderness currently twelve prospective wilderness areas Hilgard Wilderness Study Area (79,000 acres) designation for the Mt. Henry and McGregor­ now being considered by Congress. Three of and the Hyalite Wilderness Study Area Thompson areas. I would llke to have the those are in H.R.. 3454. Nine others are in (22,300 acres) . B. 393 would designate !or opportunity to discuss with you in some de­ S. 393, but there is one area, Mt. Henry, that wilderness study 289,000 acres in the Taylor­ tail the rationale that the Department fol­ 1s included in. both bllls. Tlle twelfth wild­ Hilgard area and 151,000 acres in the Hyalite­ lowetl til making th is recommendation. erness prospect Ls the Beartooth-Absaroka Porcupine-Buffalo Horn area. In this discussion, I would llke to con­ proposal that Senator Metcalf plans to sub­ Land management planning now under­ sider a number of items, many of which you mit legislation for soon. way proposes to designate a 93,450-acre West can assist me substantially in obtaining back­ For those t welve area.s, I am particula rly Pioneer Wilderness St udy Area (vs. 151,000 ground Information. First, I am particularly interested in t he following Information. acres in S. 393) , and a 10,856-acre wilderness intrigued by a statement made to me the What is the st atus of the Wilderness studies study area (vs. the 94,000 acre Sapphire other day by a friend of mine from the done on them by the Forest Service? How area inS. 393). Land management planning Wilderness Society, Bill Cunningham. Bill long have those studies taken, and how much has been completed !or the Mt. Henry, Ten said that on a sustained-yield basis, the longer is it expected before they are com­ U.S. forests in Montana could provide an Lakes, McGregor-Thompson, and Bluejoint pleted? Roughly, what does lt cost to pre­ areas and decisions made heretofore to man­ annual allowable cut equal to that for the pare those studies? Has the puollc been in­ average annual cut over the pa.st five year$. age them for other than wllderness purposes. volved in the studies, and 1! so, to what Planning 1s incomplete for the Welcome U this is so, it wculd seem to me that the degree? Finally, are there reports available Forest Service can provide enough timber Creek, Taylord-Hilgard and Hyallte-Porcu­ on these studies, and, 1f so, how long are pine-Buffalo Horn areas, and has· not been to the Montana forest products industry to they and are they Immediately available to meet our state's employment needs without my office? started !or the Big Snowies and Middle Fork sacrificing any further intrusion into road­ I would like to sit down with you and dis­ Judith areas. less areas. cuss some of the questions I have raised In Studies have not been started !or the two I am intrigued by this notion, primarily this letter. Ideally, I would like to meet with designated wllderness study areas. Other because almost every time I talk with some­ you on these matters within the next two than the H.R. 3454 and S. 393 areas, Montana body from the forest products industry In weeks because I would like to be a.ble to has 25 wilderness study areas designated by Montana, I am told that it is necessary to make my recommendation to Chairman the Forest Service and two designated by the go into new land if the industry is to sus­ Roncalio on or before June 1. Congress--the Great Bear and tl;le Elkhorn. tain itself at current levels. With best personal regards, I am First priority for completion 1s mandated by Perhaps you oan· help me address this ques­ Sincerely, those congressional studies. tion by providing information on a forest-by­ MAx BAUCUS. Generally speaking, a wilderness study forest basis on the following items. For the takes 2-3 years and costs about $3 to $4 per past five years and for the next five years U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, acre. We also request a minerals study !rom on a projected basis, what is the forest sus­ the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bu­ tained yield, its allowable cut, the amount of FOREST SERVICE, Washington, D.O., June 15, 1977. reau of Mines, both U.S. Department of the board feet actually placed on bid, the amount Interior agencies. Their field work and report of board feet actually purchased, and, Hon. MAX BAUCUS, House of Representatives, preparation usually takes 2-3 years. We do finally, the amount of board feet actually cut? not have cost data !or their work. The If there is a way to disa.ggregate that infor­ Washington, D.O. DEAR MR. BAUCUS: This letter Will sUpple­ size of the area, amount of resource infor­ mation to relate it directly to the wilderness mation available, degree o! public involve­ areas, that would be helpful, but it 1s ·not ment our acknowledgment of June 1 to your letter of Inquiry seeking information about ment, and other !actors determine the length necessary. and cost of the wilderness studies. The pub­ My suspicion is that currently roaded areas timber data and roadless areas in Montana. The following information 1s provided !or lic is invited to participate 1n the study. They may not be able to provide enough In the your review. have an opportunity to present their views way of allowable cuts to sustain Montana's on a proposal at a public hearing and to forest products Industry at existing levels We believe the enclosed Tables 1 through comment on the environmental statements. unless more intensive forestry practices are 4 will provide you with the specific timber We intend to devise means to streamline the used than are currently provided by the U.S. resource data you requested. Also enclosed 1s a Supplemental Statement !or all areas wilderness study process making it less cost­ Forest Service. This 1s not intended as a crit­ ly in funds and time. icism of the Forest Service. Rather, the in­ ln B. 393. This provides a. short summary !or tell;Sity of forestry practices is largely .a func­ each area including data !or commercial The twelfth area 1s the proposed Beartooth tion of budget. Fortunately, the Interior forest lands and potential annual yield. Wilderness. The Wllderness Act of 1964 Appropriations Committee has seen fit to You have asked us to furnish an estima­ (PL. 88-577) directed that all primitive recommend nearly a $200 million increase in tion o! harvest level increases which might areas be studied and reported on within ten the Forest Service budget !or reforestation. be achieved through increased intensive for­ years. The Absaroka (64,000 acres) and the How much impact that will have on Mon­ est management in Montana. We do not Beartoot:tl (230,000 acres) prUnitive areas tana now and in the future Ls something I have information which 1s specific !or Mon­ were reviewed concurrently. Numerous pub­ do not know. However, you may have In­ tana, but we have the following estimates lic meetings were held between May 1968 formation on that particular item, and 1! !or the Northern Region as a whole. By 1980, and the public hearing in March 1974. The so, I would certainly like to know your Views. the annual potential yield (ma.ximum al­ proposed Beartooth Wllderness ( 542,437 lowable harvest) can be increased !rom 1.7 acres) was forwarded by the President to the Perhaps it would be possible to provide Congress in December 1974. A copy of the me actual and projected data on existing al­ billion to 1.8 billion board !eet and the an­ lowable cuts and projected allowable cuts nual sell program increased !rom 1.1 billion proposal and the final environmental state­ given various hypothetical increases in funds to 1.3 blllion board feet. This 1s based on: ment 1s enclosed !or your use. The Beartooth· available !or intensive management prac­ ( 1) the assumption that the commercial Wilderness proposal w1ll be reexamined in tices. For example, In your estimation, how forest land base will not be decreased more light o! the President's recent environmental much would Montana's allowable cuts be than 1.9 milllon acres or below 10.8 million message. affected by national increases in reforesta­ acres, (2) that biological and economic prob­ We will be pleased to answer any questions tion budgets in Increments of $100 million? lems involved in operating in marginal areas you may have after review of this data. Your One final note on reforestation. A good can be overcome, and (3) investments in tnterest in the administration of the Na­ bit of my thinking of late in this area was funding and manpower for intensive prac­ tional Forests is very much appreciated. prompted by a passage from your testimony tices are available in a timely fashion now, Sincerely, before Mr. Roncalio's subcommittee when and In the future. JoHN R. McGUIRE, you stated that, "I can assure the Committee In 1980, timber management !utlding 1n Chief. June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19327

TABLE I.-MONTANA NATIONAL FORESTS (In millions of board feet)

Programed allowable harvest Projected programed harvest 1 Forest 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Beaverhead ______----______59 28 19 30 4 18 42 29 32 32 32 Bitterroot.______------____ 58 36 39 46 53 45 42 38 38 38 38 Custer------______3 1 2 4 5 5 6 5 4 5 5 Deerlodge_. ______------______42 37 19 21 36 25 30 25 30 32 32 Flathead ______------______184 119 112 135 150 104 136 116 105 105 105 Gallatin ______------______18 15 19 28 27 16 22 16 16 16 16 Helena.______18 12 8 14 10 12 18 16 16 16 16 Kootenai______242 184 192 209 184 187 207 190 185 185 195 Lewis and Clark______10 10 9 15 16 10 15 13 13 13 13 Lolo ______------______---- ______187 88 130 150 150 126 153 135 125 125 130 Totals ______---8-21------530 549 652 635 548 671 583 564 567 582

t Furnished by region-midpoint of range. TABLE 11.-MONTANA NATIONAL FORESTS [In millions of board feet)

Potential yield (allowable cut)-sawtimber Projected potential yield-sawtimber 2 Forest 1972 1973 1974 19751 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982

Beaverhead ______------65 65 60 59 59 59 59 45 45 45 54 Bitterroot______------53 53 53 64 64 64 50 50 50 50 05 Custer __ ------______------10 10 10 10 10 10 10 8 8 8 8 49 49 49 64 64 64 64 40 40 40 40 182 182 170 146 146 146 146 120 120 120 120 Gallatin.~~~h~~~9:= __ =• =_____ ======--_-----_------======-- = 48 48 38 45 45 45 45 25 25 25 25 Helena. ______------_-_-_------33 33 32 30 30 30 30 21 21 21 21 Kootenai. __ ------234 234 233 240 240 287 287 230 230 230 230 Lewis and Clark ______40 40 37 23 23 23 23 15 15 15 15 Lolo _____ • ______------192 192 184 189 189 189 189 150 150 150 150 TotaL _____ ------906 906 866 870 870 917 903 704 704 704 704

t Old allowable cuts recast to include marginal component; allowable cut term expanded to ! Furnished by region. potential yield fiscal years 1975 to 1982. TABLE II I.-MONTANA NATIONAL FORESTS [In millions of board feet)

Offered for sale Volume purchased Volume actually cut Forest 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976

Beaverhead ______------15 26 20 13 1 16 20 13 1 16 24 22 12 lt Bitterroot.______------30 32 36 45 34 30 32 35 25 25 46 39 23 24 24 Custer __ .------____ ---- ______------10 2 2 5 ------1 2 2 5 ------4 1 I 23 43 19 22 15 23 37 13 22 11 30 27 21 16 19 132 121 113 149 125 132 120 lll 148 117 156 118 133 115 110 Gallatin._------~~~~~~:~~======16 10 19 19 18 8 5 5 12 12 25 13 16 12 5 Helena ______3 8 10 12 10 2 6 6 12 7 16 25 26 10 8 Kootenai__------137 162 167 210 183 137 162 162 201 171 198 172 170 142 152 lewis and Clark ______8 4 10 5 16 6 3 4 5 16 12 19 7 11 8 Lolo. _------85 90 116 104 104 85 69 102 85 87 158 130 114 110 107 Totals ______------449 506 512 581 511 424 450 459 525 449 662 567 536 453 445

TABLE tV.-COMMERCIAL FOREST LAND AND ESTIMATED FREEDOM FOR LITHUANIA in 1954, a House Select Committee POTENTIAL YIELD IN NONSELECTED ROADLESS AREAS to investigate Communist aggression AND UNDEVELOPED AREAS INCLUDED IN THE CALCU­ reported: LATED POTENTIAL YIELD HON. HENRY J. HYDE The evidence is overwhelming and conclu­ OF ILLINOIS sive that Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania were Estimated IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES forcibly occupied and illegally annexed by the potential U.S.S.R.; that the elections conducted in yield from Wednesday, June 15, 1977 CFL in non­ July, 1940, were free and voluntary or that non­ Total selected Mr. HYDE. Mr. Speaker, 37 years ago the resolutions adopted by the resulting selected potential road less today-on June 1_5, 1940-the Soviet Un­ parliaments into petitioning for recognition Total roadless Y.ield areas as Soviet Republics were legal, are false and CFL areas (million (million ion invaded Lithuania, even though an (thousand (thousand board board agreement between the U.S.S.R. and without foundation in fact. Forest acres) acres) feet) feet) Lithuania signed on October 10, 1939, And former President Ford stated on stipulated: the eve of the Helsinki Summit, July 25, Beaverhead ______935.5 448.7 59 28.3 Bitterroot.______625.4 395.6 64 40.5 The realization of this Treaty must not 1975: Custer______•• __ 291.9 8. 4 10 .3 infringe the sovereign rights of the contract­ ... the United States has never recognized Deerlodge ______782.0 126.6 64 10.4 ing parties, especially the structure of their Rathead ______971.4 315.9 146 47.5 the Soviet incorporation of Lithuania, Latvia Gallatin ______502.6 167.4 45 15.0 State, their economic and social systems, and Estonia and is not doing so now. Helena. ___ ------597.7 140.4 30 7.1 military instruments and altogether the prin­ Kootenai______1, 599.3 345.7 287 62.0 ciple of non-intervention of one State in the On May 5, 1976, the U.S. Senate joined Lewis and Clark •• 696.7 479.7 23 15.8 Lolo ______internal atl'airs of the other State. this Chamber in passing a resolution 1,423. 2 479.6 189 63.7 stating the sense of Congress: TotaL ______8,425. 7 2,908.1 917 290.6 There is no denying the fact that Lith­ (1) that there has been no change in the uania was illegally annexed and remains longstanding policy of the United States on Note: furnished by region-phone request. so to this day. During the 83d Congress, nonrecognition of the lllegal seizure and 19328 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS June 15, 1977 annexation by the Soviet Union of the three JuNE 9, 1977. of oil a day in 1984, which is about 4 million Baltic nations of Estonia, Latvia and Lithu­ Re The President's Energy Proposal. barrels a day more than it did in 1974. ania, and (2) that it will continue to be the Hon. OLIN EARL TEAGUE, And there seems to be agreement among policy of the United States not to recognize House Office Building, the experts that we will have to rely on oil in any way the annexation of the Baltic Washington, D.C. and gas, coal and nuclear power for most of nations by the Soviet Union. DEAR CoNGRESSMAN TEAGUE: In some quar­ our energy supply over at least the next 10 ters, I am sure that this letter I write today years-with oil and gas bearing the largest Furthermore, President Carter stated in will be characterized as parochial. It is not burden. (It has been estimated that the en­ his campaign literature: so intended, but if it sounds that way, it is ergy supply during that time will be 52 % Today, when we look at the list of coun­ only because I sincerely believe that the from oil and gas, 33% from coal, and 14% tries in an atlas or an almanac, the name of highest and best interests of The University from nuclear power under the goals set by Lithuania is generally missing. But no atlas of Texas parallel the highest and best in­ the President's National Energy Plan.] or almanac can wipe out the memory of the terests of the State of Texas and our Nation. Production from existing oil and gas fields illegal way in which the Soviet Union oc­ Neither is my letter intended to suggest is declining-with a resulting increasing gap cupied Lithuania and the other Baltic states that our esteemed President had anything between production from presently proved in 1940 .... I would continue the long-stand­ less than the highest and best interests of reserves and total demand. How do we close ing bipartisan policy of non-recognition of the Nation in mind when he came forth with this gap? the Soviet annexation of Lithuania, Latvia, his recent energy proposal. Indeed, as any As recently stated by Dr. W. L. Fisher, and Estonia. chief executive, he is largely the captive of Bureau of Economic Geology, the University of Texas at Austin~ I remind my colleagues of all of this the ideas of his advisors, unless he has taken "Under the production requirements, as today because we in Congress, represent­ the time neceEsary to explore their notions opposed to the pricing policy of NEP, these in depth, and determine whether or not declines in the producing areas, including ing the American people, must continue their motives stem entirely from good faith, to voice our strong opposition to the So­ Texas, must be reversed. Assuming finding whether or not their assumptions are spe­ rates as a function of exploratory drllling, viet Union's illegal and hostile acts of cious, whether or not their order of priorities and total reserve additions as a function of aggression. Members of Congress have is politically motivated, and, basically, total drilling, we must steadily inC!'ease repeatedly done so. And President Car­ whether or not the conclusions drawn by his ~jrilling to a level about twice that of last ter obviously concurs and he has de­ advisors are based on mis1nformation or year. If this doubling is achieved by the early clared on numerous occasions that the something less than all the facts and logic. 1980's, production declines possibly could be issue of human rights is of the utmost Surely our President has done at least arrested, and restored to last year's level by concern to him and members of his ad­ that, and consequently, I must say that if 1985, and meet the NEP requirements." his energy proposal has errors and omissions, In other words, we close the gap by new ministration. they were honestly made. supply, and new supply of oil and gas de­ Thus, I believe it is imperative that I will not dwell on the fact that an energy pends on potential supply (which is worth­ our U.S. Representatives who are at­ crisis exists, nor wlll I dwell on the contri­ less in the ground) and someone who will tending the followup Conference on butions of indecision, wrong decisions, and explore for new supply. European Security and Cooperation in refusal to face reality, beginning some 20 The potential supply is undoubtedly there; Belgrade at the present time confront years ago, made by our federal government but where are the oil and gas finders? the representatives of the Soviet Union (e.g., natural gas control, oil import program, Dr1111ng rates have moved somewhat up­ concerning their blatant disregard of, east coast off-shore drllling delay, Alaska ward, but by and large, most of those thou­ pipeline delay stemming from the National sands of independents who drill at least 80% and noncompliance with, the Final Act Environmental Policy Act, and the Clean Air of all wells and 90% of the wildcat wells, as of Helsinki. Act amendments), nor on the highly com­ well as the majors, are out there waiting for We share with the Lithuanian people a plex matrix of problems involving alternate a reasonable economic opportunity to buy passion for freedom. Were our home­ energy sources, enlightened tradeoffs between leases, to explore and drill-so they can run land to be invaded today and occupied energy needs and environmental costs, the the 1 to 20 risk o! finding oil and gas and for the next 40 years, I know that we source of investment capital, and the federal make new discoveries. In short, they are Americans would still be fighting as de­ tax structure. waiting for price incentives which w1ll let terminedly to win back our freedom and All of these matters have been treated at them realize a reasonable rate of return on a independence 40 years from now as we great length in the media and professional high risk investment, and furnish them the journals, seminars, speeches, etc., etc. Those retained earnings necessary to generate risk would be tomorrow. And we would be interested have a mass of material on which capital, either by direct use, or as a basis to passing on to our children and grand­ to base their own conclusions. So I will not convince lenders of capital that loans to them children the·same yearning for freedom speak to those points. are sound: and the same determination to fight. Instead, I would like to focus on what all Some would say that the proposed National Such are the feelings of the Lithuan­ of this means to the University of Texas, and Energy Plan orovides those incentives for in­ ian people; how can we not sympathize to other landowners, present and prospective creased activity by those who seek oil and royalty owners, and taxpayers of this great gas. But not so. with such emotions? The American peo­ According to Dr. Stephen McDonald, pro­ ple will never forget their plight and we State of ours. The primary point of impact on the Uni­ fessor of economics of the University of Tex­ will continue to pray for the day when versity of Texas is the income from the 2.1 as, except for incremental tertiary recovery, Lithuanians can celebrate their renewed ·million acres of University Lands, part of stripper oil, and Alaska on, the program independence, rather than commem­ which is under oil and gas leases, which con­ would: orate the day of their homeland's in­ stitutes, in my view, a very attractive oil "1. Allow the price of newly discovered on vasion. and gas prospect for those who seek to find to rise over a three year period to the 1977 those hydrocarbons. It should be noted that world price adjusted for inflation, and there­ Texas A&M University receives one-third of after permit further adjustments for HON. EDWARD CLARK, OF TEXAS, the net income from University Lands, and, inflation. while I do not and cannot speak for that "2. Continue indefinitely the regulated ef­ SPEAKS OUT ON THE PRESIDENT'S great institution, its interests are also at fective prices to producers of $5.25 for old oil ENERGV PROGRAM stake under the propo~d National Energy and $11.28 for old •new' oil (1973-77 vintage), Plan. with adjustments for inflation. HON. OLIN E. TEAGUE The President's Plan, basically, ls a pro­ "3. By means of a tax on $5.25 and $11.28 gram which, in effect, deals with only one oil, bring their market prices (including tax) OF TEXAS side of the energy problem-demand. Al­ to the world price level by 1980, and there­ IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES though demand spawned by wasteful use of after adjust the tax uoward for inflation. "4. Use the proceeds of the tax to compen­ Wednesday, June 15, 1977 energy 1s important, and needs to be ad­ dressed, the proposed program fails wholly sate the public, by means of tax credits or Mr. TEAGUE. Mr. Speaker, under to tackle the other. and much more signifi­ direct payments on a per capita basis, for the increased price of oil." leave to extend mv remarks in the REc­ cant sid~new supply. ORD, I wish to include a copy of a letter The well founded materials I have read Faced with the fact that drilling is in the I have received from the Honorable Ed­ seem to agree that the basic problem is one of doldrums under present price controls, which ward Clark. a member of the board of supply of energy, even when taking account generate only minimal earnings available for of reasonable conservation measures to re­ retention, it is simply incredible to me that regents of the University of Texas svs­ duce demand. Demand will continue to in­ anyone would think that continuation of tem. Mr. Clark, a former Ambassador crease, even though the rate of increase w1ll price controls would encourage a silmlficantly and a lon~time public servant. discusses be lower. Indeed, there are solid opinions higher rate of domestic drilling activity. the President's energy proposals in great that even if the consumption of oil is only It is even more incredible to me that any­ depth and I commend his letter to my one-half of what it has been, the United one would think that domestic production colleagues: States wlll stlll need almost 21 million barrels would be encouraged by taking potential in- June 15, 1977 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS 19329 come from the oil finders, and giving it away ity and let the gas price throughout the na­ cerns President Carter's proposed with­ to the public-thereby, in effect, redistrib­ tion find its competitive level, as it now does drawal of American ground forces from uting risk capital from those who will use it within gas-producing states. This would pro­ Korea. There is very serious ground for to find oil and gas, to those who won't use it vide the most effective lever for the switch for that purpose. to coal from inappropriate uses of natural concern, from the evidence we have to­ I suppose that some additional leasing and gas, as well as the working capital for in­ day, that inadequate planning has gone drilling activity could result in Texas from tensified gas exploration. As those who live into this potentially momentous de­ the permitted graduated increase in the price within gas-producing states know well, that cision. The administration has up to of oil produced from wells drllled under per­ price is not a pleasant fact of life, but lt is now been unable to demonstrate that this mits issued on or after April 20, 1977, 1f (as not catastrophic." withdrawal is part of a rationally calcu­ defined in the NEP) the oil and gas finders I fear that 1f the President's NEP is lated or clearly articulated policy, or that can find locations which are at least 2.5 adopted, we can never expect to realize the it has given due consideration to the miles from the location of any producing income from University Lands that we should well, or which wm have a "depth of produc­ be able to forecast under ordinary free mar­ effects this withdrawal might have on tion of which 1,000 feet or more is in excess ket conditions, either from bonuses, delay America's friends and allies in Asia. This of the depth of production of any well which rentals, or royalties. Moreover, royalties from latter point is particularly important, produced or was capable of producing on existing production from those Lands will since the importance of America's pres­ April 20, 1977"-whatever that last condition not keep pace proportionately with free mar­ ence in Korea is psychological as much as means. ket prices. military. This latter point is the subject But I don't see how that would be much I further fear that producers would be of an excellent column from the Los encouragement, and I don't think that it discouraged from making development in­ Angeles Times which I strongly recom­ would be much incentive to those in the oil vestments, engaging in secondary recovery and gas business, especially in view of the operations, reworking wells, etc., all to the mend to the Members. I include it in the cloudy tax picture most of them now have detriment of University Land production and RECORD: by virtue of the Tax Reduction Act of 1975, income. To ASIANS, THE AMERICANS ARE INSCRUTABLE­ which substantially repealed percentage de­ In answer to the proposed National En­ ABSENCE OF RATIONALE FOR KOREA PULLBACK pletion for nearly 85 percent of domestic oil ergy Plan, I would agree that a "free market" RISKS CONFUSION OVER INTENT and gas, and changes in tax consequences in is the answer. I believe in a "free market," (By Sam Jameson) especially where the interests of The Uni­ typical farm-out transactions under a recent ToKYo.-Maj. Gen. John K. Singlaub, IRS ruling. versity of Texas are concerned, and more especially where the interests of the State ordered home from Korea fo:r publicly ques­ Indeed, as said by one editorial writer, it tioning the military wisdom of President makes about as much sense as a program to an