DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft – June 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft – June 2020 INGLEWOOD TRANSIT CONNECTOR OPERATING SYSTEM CONCEPTUAL PLANNING EIR PROJECT DEFINITION DRAFT – JUNE 2020 ‐ ATTORNEY‐CLIENT PRIVILEGE ‐ FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY DRAFT Inglewood Transit Connector Operating System Conceptual Planning for EIR Project Definition TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Report Purpose ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Basic Assumptions ......................................................................................................................... 1 2. System Layout ....................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1. Utilities Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.2. Alternatives ................................................................................................................................... 5 3. Technology Assessment ........................................................................................................................ 6 3.1. Self‐Propelled Rubber‐Tire APMs ................................................................................................. 8 3.1.1. Applicability to ITC Project .................................................................................................. 11 3.2. Monorails .................................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.1. Applicability to the ITC Project ............................................................................................ 15 3.3. Automated Light Rail Transit (ALRT) ........................................................................................... 15 3.3.1. Applicability to the ITC Project ............................................................................................ 16 4. Projected Ridership ............................................................................................................................. 18 5. System Operations .............................................................................................................................. 19 5.1. Typical Operations ...................................................................................................................... 19 5.2. Simulation and Performance ...................................................................................................... 19 5.3. Minimum Operating Headway .................................................................................................... 20 5.4. Fleet Size and Line Capacity Analysis .......................................................................................... 21 6. Stations ............................................................................................................................................... 23 6.1. Basic Functions ............................................................................................................................ 23 6.2. Station Configuration .................................................................................................................. 24 6.2.1. Applicability to the ITC Project ............................................................................................ 25 6.3. Station Dimensions ..................................................................................................................... 25 6.3.1. Station Length ..................................................................................................................... 26 6.3.2. Station Width ...................................................................................................................... 26 6.3.2.1. Assumptions ................................................................................................................ 27 6.3.2.2. Platform Queuing Analysis .......................................................................................... 27 6.4. Vertical Circulation ...................................................................................................................... 28 Lea+Elliott, Inc.; DRAFT June 2020 Page i ATTORNEY‐CLIENT PRIVILEGE; FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Inglewood Transit Connector Operating System Conceptual Planning for EIR Project Definition 6.4.1. Operational Requirements Analysis .................................................................................... 29 7. Guideway ............................................................................................................................................ 31 7.1. Guideways and Guideway Equipment ........................................................................................ 31 7.1.1. Clearances ........................................................................................................................... 31 7.1.2. Maintenance/Emergency Walkway .................................................................................... 34 7.1.3. Crossovers and Switches ..................................................................................................... 35 7.2. Alignment .................................................................................................................................... 38 7.2.1. Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 39 7.2.2. Profile .................................................................................................................................. 39 7.3. Other Guideway Considerations ................................................................................................. 39 8. Maintenance and Storage Facility....................................................................................................... 41 8.1. Layout .......................................................................................................................................... 41 8.1.1. Vehicle Storage ................................................................................................................... 41 8.1.2. Maintenance Bays ............................................................................................................... 42 8.1.3. Vehicle Wash: ...................................................................................................................... 45 8.1.4. Maintenance Support Facilities .......................................................................................... 46 8.1.4.1. Repair Shops and Inventory ........................................................................................ 48 8.1.4.2. Administrative ............................................................................................................. 49 8.1.4.3. Command, Control, and Communications. ................................................................. 49 8.1.4.4. Roadway and Ground Floor Access ............................................................................. 49 8.1.5. Spatial Requirements .......................................................................................................... 50 8.2. Elevations .................................................................................................................................... 52 9. Traction Power Substations ................................................................................................................ 53 9.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 53 9.2. Assumptions ................................................................................................................................ 54 9.3. Typical Substation Information ................................................................................................... 56 9.3.1. Substation Single Line Diagram ........................................................................................... 56 9.3.2. Estimated PDS Substation Space Allocations ...................................................................... 57 9.3.2.1. Underground PDS Substation ..................................................................................... 58 9.4. Analysis Results ........................................................................................................................... 60 9.4.1. Mainline Operations ........................................................................................................... 60 9.4.2. Normal Operation ............................................................................................................... 60 Lea+Elliott, Inc.; DRAFT June 2020 Page ii ATTORNEY‐CLIENT PRIVILEGE; FOR REVIEW AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY Inglewood Transit Connector Operating System Conceptual Planning for EIR Project Definition 9.4.3. Failure Operations ..............................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Adapting Automated People Mover Capacity on Airports to Real-Time Demand Via Model-Based Predictive Control
    Adapting Automated People Mover Capacity on Airports to Real-Time Demand via Model-Based Predictive Control M.P. van Doorne1, G. Lodewijks2, W.W.A. Beelaerts van Blokland3 1 Airbiz Aviation Strategies Ltd., 92 Albert Embankment, SE1 7TY, London, United Kingdom 2 University of New South Wales, School of Aviation, NSW 2052, Sydney, Australia 3Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628 CD, Delft, The Netherlands Abstract The Automated People Mover (APM) is an important asset for many airports to transport passengers inside or between terminal and satellite buildings An APM system normally runs on fixed schedules throughout the day, which means that the capacity of the APM is pre-determined and not depending on the actual demand. This at times can cause either an overcapacity, which leads to a waste of resources, or an under capacity, which results in passengers waiting at the station. Especially the latter factor is problematic, as it reduced passenger experience and can negatively affect the transfer process between airport facilities. In order to better match the offered APM capacity with the demand, it is proposed in this paper to use sensor-based predictive control system, which adapts the APM system capacity to real-time demand. By means of sensor data, passenger numbers are determined before they walk onto the stations platforms, and subsequently the APM system capacity is adjusted to the measured demand. In principle there are two methods to change the APM system capacity, i.e.: 1) by changing the APM capacity (i.e. more cars per train) or 2) by changing the frequency.
    [Show full text]
  • KSP 7 Lessons from Korea's Railway Development Strategies
    Part - į [2011 Modularization of Korea’s Development Experience] Urban Railway Development Policy in Korea Contents Chapter 1. Background and Objectives of the Urban Railway Development 1 1. Construction of the Transportation Infrastructure for Economic Growth 1 2. Supply of Public Transportation Facilities in the Urban Areas 3 3. Support for the Development of New Cities 5 Chapter 2. History of the Urban Railway Development in South Korea 7 1. History of the Urban Railway Development in Seoul 7 2. History of the Urban Railway Development in Regional Cities 21 3. History of the Metropolitan Railway Development in the Greater Seoul Area 31 Chapter 3. Urban Railway Development Policies in South Korea 38 1. Governance of Urban Railway Development 38 2. Urban Railway Development Strategy of South Korea 45 3. The Governing Body and Its Role in the Urban Railway Development 58 4. Evolution of the Administrative Body Governing the Urban Railways 63 5. Evolution of the Laws on Urban Railways 67 Chapter 4. Financing of the Project and Analysis of the Barriers 71 1. Financing of Seoul's Urban Railway Projects 71 2. Financing of the Local Urban Railway Projects 77 3. Overcoming the Barriers 81 Chapter 5. Results of the Urban Railway Development and Implications for the Future Projects 88 1. Construction of a World-Class Urban Railway Infrastructure 88 2. Establishment of the Urban-railway- centered Transportation 92 3. Acquisition of the Advanced Urban Railway Technology Comparable to Those of the Developed Countries 99 4. Lessons and Implications
    [Show full text]
  • Construction Supervision
    SAMBO ENGINEERING Corporate Profile To the World, For the Future Construction engineering is basically having big change as periodic requirements from “The 4th Industrial Revolution”. SAMBO ENGINEERING is trying hard to change and innovate in order to satisfy clients and react actively to the change of engineering market. SAMBO ENGINEERING provides total solution for the entire process of engineering such as plan, design, CM/PM, O&M in roads, railways, civil structures, tunnels & underground space development, transportation infrastructure & environmental treatment, new & renewable energy, urban & architecture planning for land development, water and sewage resource. Recently, from natural disaster such as earthquakes and ground settlement, in order to create motivation for stable profit system, we adapt BIM, perform topographical survey using Drones, design automation using AI, underground safety impact assessment as well as active investment for new & renewable energy such as solar and wind power plant. We accumulate lots of technologies and experience from R&D participation which develops and applies new technology and patent as well as technical exchange with academies and technical cooperation with major globalized engineering companies. SAMBO ENGINEERING will be one of the leading engineering companies in the future by overcoming “The 4th Industrial Revolution”. Algeria - Bir Touta~Zeralda Railway Project Armenia - Project Management for South-North Expressway Project Azerbaijan - Feasibility Study for Agdas~Laki, Arbsu~Kudamir~Bahramtepe
    [Show full text]
  • ACRP Report 37 – Guidebook for Planning and Implementing
    AIRPORT COOPERATIVE RESEARCH ACRP PROGRAM REPORT 37 Sponsored by the Federal Aviation Administration Guidebook for Planning and Implementing Automated People Mover Systems at Airports ACRP OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE* TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH BOARD 2010 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE* CHAIR OFFICERS James Wilding CHAIR: Michael R. Morris, Director of Transportation, North Central Texas Council of Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority (re- Governments, Arlington tired) VICE CHAIR: Neil J. Pedersen, Administrator, Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore VICE CHAIR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Robert E. Skinner, Jr., Transportation Research Board Jeff Hamiel MEMBERS Minneapolis–St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission J. Barry Barker, Executive Director, Transit Authority of River City, Louisville, KY Allen D. Biehler, Secretary, Pennsylvania DOT, Harrisburg MEMBERS Larry L. Brown, Sr., Executive Director, Mississippi DOT, Jackson James Crites Deborah H. Butler, Executive Vice President, Planning, and CIO, Norfolk Southern Corporation, Dallas–Fort Worth International Airport Norfolk, VA Richard de Neufville William A.V. Clark, Professor, Department of Geography, University of California, Los Angeles Massachusetts Institute of Technology Eugene A. Conti, Jr., Secretary of Transportation, North Carolina DOT, Raleigh Kevin C. Dolliole Unison Consulting Nicholas J. Garber, Henry L. Kinnier Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, and Director, John K. Duval Center for Transportation Studies, University of Virginia, Charlottesville Austin Commercial, LP Jeffrey W. Hamiel, Executive Director, Metropolitan Airports Commission, Minneapolis, MN Kitty Freidheim Paula J. Hammond, Secretary, Washington State DOT, Olympia Freidheim Consulting Steve Grossman Edward A. (Ned) Helme, President, Center for Clean Air Policy, Washington, DC Jacksonville Aviation Authority Adib K. Kanafani, Cahill Professor of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley Tom Jensen Susan Martinovich, Director, Nevada DOT, Carson City National Safe Skies Alliance Debra L.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE Bombardier celebrates 25th anniversary of Germany’s first automatic people mover system • INNOVIA APM vehicles carry twelve million passengers annually at Frankfurt am Main Airport – with almost 100 percent reliability • The system’s 25-year anniversary corresponds with Fraport’s opening of Terminal 2 Berlin, October 24, 2019 – Today, global mobility solution provider Bombardier Transportation celebrates 25 years of fully automatic BOMBARDIER INNOVIA APM 100 people mover system’s operation at Frankfurt am Main Airport. The system and Fraport’s Terminal 2 opened on the same day 25 years ago. Since 1994, Germany’s first elevated passenger transport system called the SkyLine, has connected Terminals 1 and 2. With an average reliability of 99.83 percent, twelve million passengers and guests per year safely and comfortably arrive at their destinations in the terminals – around the clock. “We’d like to congratulate our customer on this quarter century anniversary. We have a very successful and long-standing partnership with Fraport, which marks our joint success in moving millions of travelers between terminals at the Frankfurt Airport,” said Michael Fohrer, Head of Bombardier Transportation Germany. “Fraport benefits from a high-performing turnkey transit system, which was not only manufactured by Bombardier, but also operated and maintained. I am grateful to all our committed and competent employees, without them this milestone would not have been possible,” emphasized Alexander Ketterl, Head of Sales and Delivery German cities at Bombardier Transportation. Volker Maul, Head of the Bombardier team at Frankfurt Airport, can look back on the people mover system's 25 years of service.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents >
    < TABLE OF CONTENTS > 1. Greetings .................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Company Profile ........................................................................................................................................................................ 3 A. Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Status of Registration ........................................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Organization .............................................................................................................................................................................. 8 A. Organization chart ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 B. Analysis of Engineers ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 C. List of Professional Engineers......................................................................................................................................... 10 D. Professional Engineer in Civil Eng.(U.S.A) ..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Beginning of a Better Future
    THE BEGINNING OF A BETTER FUTURE Doosan E&C CONTENTS Doosan Engineering & PORTFOLIO BUSINESS 04 CEO Message Construction COMPANY PROFILE 06 Company Profile 08 Corporate History 12 Socially Responsible Management 16 Doosan Group BUSINESS PORTFOLIO HOUSING 22 Brand Story 28 Key Projects 34 Major Project Achievements Building a better tomorrow today, the origin of a better world. ARCHITECTURE 38 Featured Project 40 Key Projects Doosan Engineering & Construction pays keen attention 48 Major Project Achievements to people working and living in spaces we create. We ensure all spaces we create are safer and more INFRASTRUCTURE pleasant for all, and constantly change and innovate 52 Featured Project to create new value of spaces. 54 Key Projects 60 Major Project Achievements This brochure is available in PDF format which can be downloaded at 63 About This Brochure www.doosanenc.com CEO MESSAGE Since the founding in 1960, Doosan Engineering & Construction (Doosan E&C) has been developing capabilities, completing many projects which have become milestones in the history of the Korean construction industry. As a result, we are leading urban renewal projects, such as housing redevelopment and reconstruction projects, supported by the brand power of “We’ve”, which is one of the most prominent housing brands in Korea. We also have been building a good reputation in development projects, creating ultra- large buildings both in the center of major cities including the Seoul metropolitan area. In particular, we successfully completed the construction of the “Haeundae Doosan We’ve the Zenith”, an 80-floor mixed-use building 300-meter high, and the “Gimhae Centum Doosan We’ve the Zenith”, an ultra-large residential complex for 3,435 households, demonstrating, once again, Doosan E&C’s technological prowess.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nnual Report 2017 Scomi Group
    Scomi Group Bhd (571212-A) Level 17, 1 First Avenue, Bandar Utama, 47800 Petaling Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan, Malaysia +603 7717 3000 +603 7728 5258 www.scomigroup.com.my Bhd Scomi Group (571212-A) Annual ReportAnnual 2017 CONTENTS 2 Key Financial Indicators 3 Key Financial Highlights 4 Corporate Structure 6 Corporate Statement 7 Corporate Information 8 Board of Directors 14 Key Senior Management 18 Chairman’s Statement 22 Management Discussion and Analysis 26 Corporate Social Responsibility 30 Statement on Corporate Governance 46 Statement on Risk Management and Internal Control 52 Audit and Risk Management Committee Report 56 Additional Information 57 Statement of Directors’ Responsibility 58 Financial Statements 191 Analysis of Shareholdings 195 List of Properties 197 Corporate Directory 200 Notice of Annual General Meeting • Form of Proxy Scomi Group Bhd Key Financial Indicators 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 RM’000 RM’000 RM’000 RM’000 RM’000 Continuing operations Turnover 826,892 1,383,332 1,798,572 1,653,059 1,922,368 EBITDA 17,666 199,531 257,911 249,125 288,488 Depreciation and amortisation 104,962 110,032 97,524 97,501 106,413 Finance costs 61,107 63,706 56,480 70,565 160,978 Share of profit/(loss) in associates - 495 (124) (247) 133 Share of profit/(loss) from joint ventures (24,208) (10,628) 1,117 5,310 6,568 (Loss)/profit before tax (148,403) 25,793 103,907 81,059 21,097 Taxation (17,248) (13,889) (37,535) (50,113) (27,557) (Loss)/profit from continuing operations (165,651) 11,904 66,372 30,946 (6,460) Loss from discontinued operations
    [Show full text]
  • The Bulletin NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY CAR UPDATE: Published by the Electric Railroaders’ R-32S RETURN to SERVICE! Association, Inc
    ERA BULLETIN — AUGUST, 2020 The Bulletin Electric Railroaders’ Association, Incorporated Vol. 63, No. 8 August, 2020 The Bulletin NEW YORK CITY SUBWAY CAR UPDATE: Published by the Electric Railroaders’ R-32s RETURN TO SERVICE! Association, Inc. (Photographs by Ron Yee) P. O. Box 3323 Grand Central Station New York, NY 10163 For general inquiries, or Bulletin submissions, contact us at bulletin@erausa. org or on our website at erausa. org/contact Editorial Staff: Jeff Erlitz Editor-in-Chief Ron Yee Tri-State News and Commuter Rail Editor Alexander Ivanoff North American and World News Editor David Ross Production Manager Copyright © 2020 ERA This Month’s Cover Photo: SNCF Z 8800 set 42B with Z 8884 driving motor in the lead, at Javel Station and soon to depart as an RER Line C service to Versailles on the occasion of a week- A train of R-32s, led by 3436-3437, is seen entering the Hewes Street station on July 9. end service change. The 8800 class are dual Several trains of the Phase I R-32s that from the East New York facility, a fleet which voltage 1.5 kV DC / 25 kV were recently resurrected were placed back was expanded to the following 90 as of July AC 50 Hz. Built by a con- sortium of Alstom-ANF- in revenue service on the J/Z starting on 12: 3360-3361, 3376-3377, 3380-3381, CIMT-TCO, they were deliv- the morning of July 1, with the start of anoth- 3388-3389, 3394-3397, 3400-3401, 3414- ered between 1986-1988.
    [Show full text]
  • Trams Der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1
    www.blickpunktstrab.net – Trams der Welt / Trams of the World 2021 Daten / Data © 2021 Peter Sohns Seite / Page 1 Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Metro ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Alger (Algier) ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Constantine ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Oran ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Ouragla ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sétif ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Algeria ... Sidi Bel Abbès ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF ... Metro ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Caballito ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Lacroze (General Urquiza) ... Interurban (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Premetro E ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Buenos Aires, DF - Tren de la Costa ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Córdoba, Córdoba ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Mar del Plata, BA ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 900 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Mendoza, Mendoza ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Argentina ... Rosario, Santa Fé ... Trolleybus Argentina ... Valle Hermoso, Córdoba ... Tram-Museum (Electric) ... 600 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Metro ... 1524 mm Armenia ... Yerevan ... Trolleybus Australia ... Adelaide, SA - Glenelg ... Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Ballarat, VIC ... Heritage-Tram (Electric) ... 1435 mm Australia ... Bendigo, VIC ... Heritage-Tram
    [Show full text]
  • Mono-Rail Guided Transport
    Mono-Rail guided Transport - From the 1902 Mono-Rail guided Bullock Cart in India to the 21th Century Centre Mono-Rail guided Los Angeles Automated Airport People Mover (LAX APM) in USA Indian Steam hauled Patiala Mono-Rail (1907-1927) preserved in running Condition in National Rail Museum at New Delhi By F.A. Wingler June 2019 1 From the 1902 Mono-Rail guided Bullock Cart in India to the 21th Century Mono-Rail guided Los Angeles Airport Automatic People Mover (LAX APM) in USA I. Mono-Rail guided Carriage Transport in India from 1902 to 1927 The first Mono-Rail guided goods carriage system, a road borne railway system, had been the Kundala Valley Railway in India, which was built in 1902 and operated between Munnar and Top Station in the Kannan Devan Hills of Kerala. It operated with a cart- vehicle, built to transport tea and other goods. The initial cart road was cut in 1902 and then replaced by the monorail goods carriage system along the road leading from Munnar to Top Station for the purpose of transporting tea and other products from Munnar and Madupatty to Top Station. This monorail was based on the Ewing System (see below) and had small steel-wheels placed on the mono-rail track while a larger wheel rested on the road to balance the monorail. The mono-rail was pulled by bullocks. Top Station was a trans-shipment point for delivery of tea from Munnar to Bodinayakkanur. Tea chests arriving at Top Station were then transported by an aerial ropeway from Top Station 5 km (3 mi) down-hill to the south to Kottagudi, Tamil Nadu, which popularly became known as "Bottom Station".
    [Show full text]
  • Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report
    Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Work Order #GPC V-16 Metromover System Expansion Study Final Report Prepared for: Miami-Dade County Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: Work Order # GPC V-16 September 2014 This Page Intentionally Left Blank Miami-Dade MPO Metromover System Expansion Study Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................................................................................i List of Figures ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ v List of Appendices ............................................................................................................................................................................................ vi 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Study Need ..................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]