DOCSLIB.ORG

La Gran Colombia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
La Gran Colombia DOCENTE: Yeny Carely Rueda Gómez ÁREA:Historia de Colombia GRADO: 5° UNIDAD TEMÁTICA: Nueva Granada y Estados Unidos de Colombia. GUÍA Nº: 2 FECHA: “UN ESPACIO PEDAGÓGICO DE DESARROLLO DE INTELIGENCIAS” NOMBRE: _______________________________________________________________________________ Indicador de logro: Argumenta cómo se desarrolló el proceso de conformación de la República de la Nueva Granada y los Estados Unidos de Colombia. LA GRAN COLOMBIA PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS ADOPTADAS POR LA GRAN COLOMBIA COMO REPÚBLICA INDEPENDIENTE ● El control político fue asumido por los criollos, quienes empezaron administrar el gobierno desde los cargos políticos. ● Se adoptó para el país un gobierno republicano regido por una constitución. ● El poder público se dividió en tres ramas: Ejecutiva, legislativa y judicial. ● Se acordó la conformación de un Congreso con representantes de todas las provincias, para redactar las leyes de toda la República. ● Algunos esclavos lograron su libertad. ● Se inició el pago de la deuda que el país adquirió con Inglaterra para financiar la guerra de independencia. Página 1 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 Nuevas Independencias, nuevas anexiones a la Gran Colombia ❖ La Gran Colombia inició su consolidación como República. ❖ Simón Bolívar apoyó las luchas independistas que se desarrollaron en los territorios suramericanos. ❖ Dejó de presidente a Francisco de Paula Santander. DESACUERDOS POLÍTICOS EN LA GRAN COLOMBIA Durante los años de vigencia del proyecto de la Gran Colombia se presentaron diferentes desacuerdos de tipo político relacionados principalmente con la forma de gobierno que debía ser adoptada en la nueva República, dividiendo a los criollos en dos bandos. Los que ​ apoyaban el centralismo y los que apoyaban el federalismo. ARGUMENTA 1. Teniendo en cuenta lo explicado en clase indica con tus palabras qué entiendes por centralismo y federalismo. __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 2. ¿Por qué razón se iniciaron los desacuerdos políticos entre los dirigentes de la Gran Colombia? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ Página 2 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 3. ¿Qué diferenciaba el pensamiento de Simón Bolívar respecto al de Francisco de Paula Santander? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 4. ¿ Cuál fue el principal objetivo de Simón Bolívar al proclamar la constitución Boliviana en 1826? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 5. ¿Por qué crees que Santander se opuso al nombramiento de Bolívar como presidente vitalicio? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 6. ¿Qué efectos tuvo para la estabilidad política la redacción de la Constitución Boliviana? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ 7. ¿Qué motivos crees que tuvieron Perú y Bolivia para aceptar la propuesta de integrar la Gran Colombia? __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Página 3 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 Teniendo en cuenta los dramatizados en clase, justifica. 8. ¿Qué hechos condujeron a la disolución de la gran Colombia; luego, represéntalo mediante un comic en tu cuaderno. 9. Lee, analiza y marca con una X la respuesta correcta. ★ Entre 1819 y 1830 se estableció una república independiente conformada por los actuales países de Colombia, Ecuador, Venezuela y Panamá. Este proyecto de unificación, conocido como la gran Colombia se desintegró, entre otras razones, por: A. las profundas diferencias culturales, la ausencia de Bolívar, la falta de unificación de la moneda. B. las dificultades entre Bolívar y Santander, la influencia de la iglesia católica y las malas vías de comunicación C. la dificultad para gobernar un territorio tan extenso, la crisis económica del país y el descontento de los líderes de Venezuela y Ecuador con la administración regentada desde Bogotá. D. las diferencias raciales y culturales entre los habitantes de Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador y Panamá. ¿Por qué es la respuesta correcta? _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________ 10.¿Por qué crees que la situación económica fue una de las causas de la desintegración de la Gran Colombia? _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Página 4 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 11.Si no se hubiera separado los países de la Gran Colombia en 1830, ¿crees que esta se mantendría aún vigente?Justifica. _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ 12. ¿Qué ventajas tendría nuestro país si la Gran Colombia no se hubiese disuelto? _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________ Lee el siguiente texto: ​ 1. según la lectura anterior marca con una X, la opinión correcta Justifica cada una de tus respuestas: ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Página 5 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 Lee el siguiente texto, En tu cuaderno y mediante un cómic representa los acuerdos que se aprobaron en el congreso de Cúcuta y explica por qué fueron importantes. Página 6 de 6 FTO-EPA-001_V2/18/01/2017 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Simón Bolívar
    Reading Comprehension/Biography SIMÓN BOLÍVAR Simón José Antonio de la Santísima Trinidad Bolívar y Palacios, (July 24, 1783 – December 17, 1830), more commonly known as Símon Bolívar, was one of the most important leaders of Spanish America's successful struggle for independence from Spain. He is a very important figure in South American political history, and served as President of Gran Colombia from 1821 to 1830, President of Peru from 1824 to 1826, and President of Bolivia from 1825 to 1826. Bolívar was born into a wealthy family in Caracas, in what is now Venezuela. Much of his family’s wealth came from silver, gold and copper mines. Later in his revolutionary life, Bolívar used part of the mineral income to finance the South American revolutionary wars. After the death of his parents, he went to Spain in 1799 to complete his education. He married there in 1802, but his wife died of yellow fever on a short return visit to Venezuela in 1803. Bolívar returned to Europe in 1804 and for a time was part of Napoleon's retinue. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1807, and, when Napoleon made Joseph Bonaparte King of Spain and its colonies in 1808, he participated in the resistance juntas in South America. The Caracas junta declared its independence in 1810, and Bolívar was sent to Britain on a diplomatic mission. Bolívar returned to Venezuela in 1811. In March 1812, he left Venezuela after an earthquake destroyed Caracas. In July 1812, junta leader Francisco de Miranda surrendered to the Spanish, and Bolívar had to flee.
    [Show full text]
  • A Key Ingredient for Successful Peacekeeping Operations Management by Joseph L
    No. 04-6W Landpower Essay October 2004 An Institute of Land Warfare Publication Special Operators: A Key Ingredient for Successful Peacekeeping Operations Management by Joseph L. Homza Low-intensity operations cannot be won or contained by military power alone. They require the application of all elements of national power across the entire range of conditions which are the source of the conflict.1 U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, Special Forces Peacekeeping is not a job for soldiers, but only a soldier can do it.2 Former United Nations Secretary-General Dag Hammerskold Multinational and regional alliances, as well as the Charter of the United Nations, include “terms that reflect a determination to provide an international institution that could control conflict” in the Low-Intensity Conflict (LIC) spectrum of war.3 As a defense contractor employed by Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, I recently had a unique opportunity to participate directly in the Military Observer Mission Ecuador and Peru (MOMEP), an LIC reduction operation conducted by conventional military forces with management influence by Special Operations Forces (SOF). The tenets of campaign analysis—e.g., military historical perspectives, force structure, command and control capabilities and military objectives—provide a paradigm to demonstrate clearly the effectiveness of this conflict management mission performed by SOF in accordance with the ten focus areas stipulated by John M. Collins in Special Operations Forces: An Assessment.4 The MOMEP Confidence Building Measure (CBM) was an example of SOF and conventional military force elements at their operational best. The Organization of American States (OAS), due to the actions of the SOF and conventional units assigned to MOMEP, would experience a successful CBM Peacekeeping Operation (PKO) in a regional context.
    [Show full text]
  • Habits of Peace: the Foundations of Long-Term Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia and South America
    Habits of Peace: The Foundations of Long-Term Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia and South America by Aarjen Derek Glas A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto @ Copyright by Aarjen Derek Glas 2017 Habits of Peace: The Foundations of Long-Term Regional Cooperation in Southeast Asia and South America Aarjen Derek Glas Doctor of Philosophy Department of Political Science University of Toronto 2017 Abstract The regions of Southeast Asia and South America are often cited as puzzling cases of long peace among nation-states. Absent hard power balancing behaviours, liberal democratic development, and economic interdependence, both present unlikely cases for prolonged periods of time absent large scale inter-state violence. This research begins with an inquiry into the foundations the long peace of each region: practices of conflict management. More narrowly, this project asks: How can we understand cooperation and community building alongside persistent militarized violence? Upon what foundations have these largely illiberal states been able to build relative but lasting peace despite pervasive territorial disputes? In answering these questions, this research argues that distinct and diplomatic habits shape the management of peace and conflict in each region. The underlying argument of this work is that the habitual and dispositional qualities of regional diplomatic practice inform the long peace of these regions and regional relations more generally. In each region, distinctive and discrete qualities of regional relations shape crisis response, but also shape how crises, themselves, are understood by regional diplomatic officials. These “habits of peace” make possible long-term regional cooperation and relative peace alongside persistent intra-regional violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Directorio-De-La-Institución.Pdf
    SERVICIO INTEGRADO DE SERGURIDAD ECU 911 - QUITO 1) Parámetros Aplicables a la Información Administrativa B. Directorio de la Institución Fecha de publicación: 31 DE MAYO DE 2014 Teléfono y extensión Correo Electrónico No. Nombres y Apellidos Cargo o Puesto Dirección institucional institucional institucional SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 1 ACOSTA FUERTES EDGAR RAMIRO TECNICO DE SEGURIDAD FISICA ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9790 [email protected] SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 2 AGUILAR CARDENAS JHONATAN GABRIEL ANALISTA DE TECNOLOGIA ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9780 [email protected] SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 3 AGUILAR CARDENAS JHONATAN GABRIEL ANALISTA TECNOLOGICO ENDARA 3800793 EXT 9793 [email protected] SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 4 AGUIRRE PALACIOS MIRYAM IVONNE ANALISTA DE TALENTO HUMANO II ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9753 [email protected] SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 5 ALBERCA GOMEZ EDWIN LEODAN ANALISTA REGULATORIO ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9762 [email protected] ANDRADE HEREDIA PAOLA DEL SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 6 CONSUELO ANALISTA ADMINISTRATIVO II ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9732 [email protected] ANALISTA DE REDES, SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 7 ARGUELLO RIVERA DIEGO DAVID TELECOMUNICACIONES Y PERIFERICOS ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9780 [email protected] ANALISTA DE REDES, SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 8 ARGUELLO RIVERA DIEGO DAVID TELECOMUNICACIONES Y PERIFERICOS ENDARA 3800785 EXT 9785 [email protected] SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO 9 ARTEAGA RODRIGUEZ MARIA BELEN ESPECIALISTA MULTIMEDIA ENDARA 3800700 EXT 9854 [email protected] AULESTIA ORTEGA CARMENSA SECTOR PARQUE ITCHIMBÍA, AV. JULIO [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Tyranny Or Victory! Simón Bolívar's South American Revolt
    ODUMUNC 2018 Issue Brief Tyranny or Victory! Simón Bolívar’s South American Revolt by Jackson Harris Old Dominion University Model United Nations Society of the committee, as well as research, all intricacies involved in the committee will be discussed in this outline. The following sections of this issue brief will contain a topical overview of the relevant history of Gran Colombia, Simón Bolívar, and Spanish-American colonial relations, as well as an explanation of the characters that delegates will be playing. This guide is not meant to provide a complete understanding of the history leading up to the committee, rather to provide a platform that will be supplemented by personal research. While there are a number of available online sources the Crisis Director has provided the information for a group of helpful books to use at the delegate’s discretion. The legacy of Simón Bolívar, the George Washington of South America, is anything but historical. His life stands at the center of contemporary South America.1 Any doubt about his relevance was eliminated on 16 July 2010 when Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez presided at the exhumation of Bolívar’s remains.2 Pieces of the skeleton were El Libertador en traje de campaña, by Arturo Michelena 1985, Galería de Arte Nacional 1 Gerhard Straussmann Masur, ‘Simón Bolívar: Venezuelan soldier and statesman’, Encyclopædia Britannica, n.d., https://www.britannica.com/biography/Simo n-Bolivar ; and Christopher Minster, FORWARD ‘Biography of Simon Bolivar: Liberator of ¡Bienvenidos delegados! Welcome to the South America’, ThoughtCo., 8 September Tyranny or Victory! Simón Bolívar’s 2017, South American Revolt crisis committee! https://www.thoughtco.com/biography-of- In order to allow delegates to familiarize simon-bolivar-2136407 2 Thor Halvorssen, ‘Behind exhumation of themselves with the rules and procedures Simon Bolivar is Hugo Chavez's warped Tyranny or Victory! Simón Bolívar’s South American Revolt removed for testing.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irish in Colombia by Edmundo Murray
    Irish Migration Studies in Latin America Vol. 4, No. 2: March 2006 www.irlandeses.org The Irish in Colombia By Edmundo Murray The only South American country with coasts on both the Pacific and the Atlantic oceans, Colom- bia was part of the Spanish viceroyalty of New Granada. The United States of Colombia, which also included Panama, Venezuela and Ecuador was proclaimed in 1819 by Simón Bolívar when he crossed the Andes and defeated the royalist forces at the battle of Boyacá. In 1822 the four countries were united as Gran Colombia, which collapsed in 1830 with the separation of Vene- zuela and Ecuador. The republic of Colombia was established in 1886, but Panama separated in 1903, after the US-backed War of the Thousand Days (1899-1902). Irish soldiers fought in Colombia during the War of Independence with Spain in 1816-1822. They were recruited in Dublin, London and other cities by John Devereux, James T. English, William Walton and others. The Irish Legion sailed from Liverpool in July 1819. Some of the officers were Major L'Estrange, Francis Burdett O'Connor, and William Aylmer. They arrived in the island of Margarita, where they suffered hardships, sickness and loss of life. In March 1820 the Legion sailed to Río Hacha, and after the attack to this city, their standard displaying the harp of Ireland was raised instead of the Palenquera in the Caribbean coast Spanish royal ensign. Weakened by lack of pay Photo Mauricio Zuloaga (http://www.uniandes.edu.co/Colombia/Turismo/turismo.html) and proper food, and complaining of the native officers, some of the Irish mutinied, got drunk and began to ransack the city for booty.
    [Show full text]
  • Rafael Urdaneta Y Maracaibo
    1 RAFAEL URDANETA Y MARACAIBO Ernesto García Mac Gregor DISCURSO DE ORDEN. 224° ANIVERSARIO DEL NATALICIO DEL GENERAL RAFAEL URDANETA. Parque Urdaneta 24 de octubre 2012 Con la venia de ustedes quisiera referirme en estas cortas palabras a nuestro paladín Rafael Urdaneta, pero en especial, a su relación directa con la ciudad de Maracaibo, a su casa natal, hoy Museo Urdaneta, a sus plazas y estatuas y a sus penurias por estas tierras. Sin embargo, hablar de nuestro principal prócer sin mencionar sus grandes logros en el ámbito nacional e internacional es más que imposible. ¿Cómo obviar al Urdaneta estadista por ejemplo? Fue gobernador de Guayana, de Caracas y el equivalente a Gobernador del Zulia. Fue Presidente del Senado y después Presidente de la Gran Colombia, Secretario de Guerra y Marina en cuatro oportunidades, Senador por la Provincia de Coro. ¿Cómo no hablar del Urdaneta guerrero, protagonista de las veintisiete batallas campales de las cuales ganó veinte? Luchó en un total de setenta y cinco acciones de guerra pero nunca tuvo la buena suerte de dirigir alguna de las batallas 2 decisivas de la emancipación. Fue el gran ausente de las contiendas gloriosas de Boyacá, Carabobo, Bomboná, Pichincha y Ayacucho que le dieron a Latinoamérica su independencia. Jamás pudo llegar a la hora de las recompensas y de las glorificaciones, pero siempre fue exacto en concurrir a la hora de los sacrificios. Es quizás por este motivo que su nombre no aparece tan frecuente como otros próceres en los libros de historia de educación primaria y media Y para entrar directamente en la historia local es necesario comenzar con la conocida controversia existente sobre el lugar de su nacimiento.
    [Show full text]
  • Simón Bolívar's Republic
    REVISTA DE SOCIOLOGIA E POLÍTICA V. 20, Nº 42: 21-37 JUN. 2012 SIMÓN BOLÍVAR’S REPUBLIC: A BULWARK AGAINST THE “TYRANNY” OF THE MAJORITY Aline Helg RESUMO Based on Bolívar’s speeches, decrees, and correspondence as well as on Gran Colombia’s constitutions and laws, this essay examines the tensions within Bolívar’s vision of Venezuela’s and New Granada’s society produced by his republican, yet authoritarian and hierarchical ideas, his concern for keeping the lower classes of African descent in check, and his denial of Indian agency. It shows that even in Peru, Bolívar’s main concern was to prevent the racial war and social disintegration that allegedly slaves and free Afro- descended people would bring to the newly independent nations. To prevent such an outcome, he advocated all along legal equality through the abolition of the colonial privileges and, since mid-1816, the abolition of slavery, but simultaneously the preservation of the monopole of power by the white creole elite. He secured the perpetuation of the socioracial hierarchy inherited from Spain by a two-edged citizenship: an active citizenship restricted to a tiny literate and skilled minority and an inactive citizenship for the immense majority of (mostly nonwhite) men. KEYWORDS: Simón Bolívar; independence; citizenship; nation building; race relations; slavery. I. INTRODUCTION “Estamos autorizados, pues, a creer que todos los hijos de la América española, de cualquier color o condición que sean, se profesan un afecto fraternal recíproco, que ninguna maquinación es capaz de alterar” (BOLÍVAR, 1947, v. 1, p. 181). “Nosotros somos el compuesto abominable de esos tigres cazadores que vinieron a la América a derramarle su sangre y a encastar con las víctimas antes de sacrificarlas, para mezclar después los frutos espúreos de estos enlaces con los frutos de esos esclavos arrancados del África.
    [Show full text]
  • AN AQUEOUS TERRITORY This Page Intentionally Left Blank an AQUEOUS TERRITORY
    AN AQUEOUS TERRITORY This page intentionally left blank AN AQUEOUS TERRITORY Sailor Geographies and New Granada’s Transimperial Greater Ca rib bean World ernesto bassi duke university press Durham and London 2016 © 2016 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of Amer i ca on acid- free paper ∞ Typeset in Minion Pro by Westchester Publishing Services Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Bassi, Ernesto, [date] author. Title: An aqueous territory : sailor geographies and New Granada’s transimperial greater Ca rib bean world / Ernesto Bassi. Description: Durham : Duke University Press, 2017. | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: lccn 2016023570 (print) lccn 2016024535 (ebook) isbn 9780822362203 (hardcover : alk. paper) isbn 9780822362401 (pbk. : alk. paper) isbn 9780822373735 (ebook) Subjects: lcsh: Geopolitics— Caribbean Area. | Ca rib bean Area— Bound aries. | Ca rib bean Area— Commerce. | Ca rib bean Area— History. | Ca rib bean Area— Politics and government. | Imperialism. Classification: lcc f2175.b37 2017 (print) | lcc f2175 (ebook) | ddc 320.1/2— dc23 lc rec ord available at https:// lccn . loc . gov / 2016023570 Cover art: Detail of Juan Álvarez de Veriñas’s map of the southern portion of the transimperial Greater Caribbean. Image courtesy of Archivo General de Indias, Seville, Spain (MP-Panama, 262). TO CLAU, SANTI, AND ELISA, mis compañeros de viaje This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS acknowl edgments ix introduction: Uncovering Other Pos si ble
    [Show full text]
  • To Write, to Tell, to Keep: the Diary of Santander in European Exile (1829-1832)
    Escrever, contar, guardar: o diário de Santander no exílio europeu (1829-1832) To write, to tell, to keep: The diary of Santander in European exile (1829-1832) Libertad Borges Bittencourt* Resumo Abstract O propósito deste artigo é examinar o The purpose of this article is to examine diário do general granadino Francisco the diary of the Grenadian General de Paula Santander (1792-1840), um Francisco de Paula Santander (1792- dos líderes da independência da Colôm- 1840), one of the leaders of the indepen- bia, escrito na primeira metade do sécu- dence of Colombia, written in the first lo XIX. Dentre as temáticas que ele pri- half of the nineteenth century. Among vilegia em seus escritos, optei por the themes he favors in his writings, I destacar suas reflexões sobre a situação chose to highlight his thoughts on the política da Colômbia, bem como suas political situation in Colombia as well considerações sobre Bolívar. Os dois ge- his notes about Bolivar. The two gener- nerais se desentenderam quanto ao mo- als quarreled about the government of delo de governo a ser estabelecido nas the independent regions from Spanish regiões libertas do jugo espanhol, e esse dissenso levou à acusação de traição, rule and this disagreement led to the ar- prisão e condenação de Santander à rest of Santander and his judgment for morte. A pena foi comutada por Bolí- treason and his condemnation to death. var, substituída pelo exílio na Europa, e The sentence was commuted by Bolivar, essa experiência como desterrado é nar- exchanged for exile in Europe, and that rada em seu diário.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Welcome Brief IFRC ENG-Ecuador-Jun 2019
    SECURITY WELCOME BRIEF FOR ECUADOR Background Ecuador What is now Ecuador formed part of the northern Inca Empire until the Spanish conquest in 1533. Quito became a seat of Spanish colonial government in 1563 and part of the Viceroyalty of New Granada in 1717. The territories of the Viceroyalty - New Granada (Colombia), Venezuela, and Quito - gained their independence between 1819 and 1822 and formed a federation known as Gran Colombia. When Quito withdrew in 1830, the traditional name was changed in favor of the "Republic of the Equator." Between 1904 and 1942, Ecuador lost territories in a series of conflicts with its neighbors. A border war with Peru that flared in 1995 was resolved in 1999. Although Ecuador marked 30 years of civilian governance in 2004, the period was marred by political instability. Protests in Quito contributed to the mid-term ouster of three of Ecuador's last four democratically elected presidents. In late 2008, voters approved a new constitution, Ecuador's 20th since gaining independence. General elections were held in February 2013, and voters reelected President Rafael CORREA. Since May 2017 Lenín Moreno is the President of Ecuador. He was Vice President from 2007 to 2013, serving under the former President Rafael Correa. The combination of low oil prices (50% of Ecuador’s export and 30% of Fiscal revenue) and a high US$ (Ecuador’s currency since 2000) drove the economy into recession and prospects for the next years remain modest. The RCRC Movement in Ecuador ICRC The presence of the ICRC in Ecuador is mainly due to the spillover of the Colombian armed conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Topic Abstract Blood and Taxes: Cabinet of Simón Bolívar, 1825
    Topic Abstract Blood and Taxes: Cabinet of Simón Bolívar, 1825 Historical Crisis | Washington, D.C. | February 11-14, 2021 A Georgetown International Relations Association, Inc. Conference Dear Delegates and Advisors, Greetings from NAIMUN LVIII! The staff has been working hard to make the conference the most rewarding and educational experience yet, and we are excited to welcome you all to D.C. in February! This document is the topic abstract for Blood and Taxes: Cabinet of Simón Bolívar, 1825. It contains three key elements to allow you to prepare well in advance for the committee: topic descriptions, questions to consider, and research avenues. This abstract will give you a better understanding of the committee’s content and procedures, and it can act as a starting point for further research. We hope to be of assistance to you in your preparation for NAIMUN LVIII. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please feel free to contact the Secretary- General, Director-General, or your Under-Secretaries-General. You may also contact your dais directly at [email protected]. We look forward to welcoming you to the NAIMUN family! Best, Alexander Chen Sanjna Jain Secretary-General Director-General [email protected] [email protected] Mags Glass Tasha Januszewicz Under-Secretary-General, Under-Secretary-General, Historical Crisis Historical Crisis [email protected] [email protected] Topic Abstract | naimun.modelun.org | 2 What is a Crisis Committee? Crisis Committees are markedly different from both GAs and ECOSOCs. They tend to focus on specific issues, geographic areas, and historical periods. For example, the Court of Louis XIV, 1665 simulates the peak years of King Louis XIV in power, tackling issues from the international expansion of the French empire to developing domestic institutions.
    [Show full text]