DOCSLIB.ORG

The Nobel Prize Laureate Who Disappeared

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Nobel Prize Laureate Who Disappeared 33 The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared How a man from Örebro was awarded the Nobel Prize thanks to a lucky eye for design and great attention to detail. Assistant and Reader Manne Siegbahn, born in 1886 in Örebro, was registered as a student at Lund University at the age of 19 and began studying physics. In the same year he was appointed teaching assistant and a few years later assistant to Janne Rydberg. He turned out to have a great talent for physics and gained a PhD in 1911 at the age of 25 with a thesis on methods of mea- suring magnetic fields. Manne Siegbahn was soon given on a leading position at the department. Rydberg was prone to illness and, Siegbahn substituted for him. Manne Siegbahn 1886 - 1978 The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 34 Rydberg’s successor 35 At that time there were many unsolved mysteries in physics research. The discovery of X-rays and radioactivity and the work of Planck and Einstein led the research onto new lines. After completing his PhD in 1911, Siegbahn fo- cused his research on X-rays. During the summer vacations he travelled to leading departments of physics around Europe – Göttingen, Munich, Heidelberg, Paris and Berlin – to acquaint himself with current work. When Rydberg retired in 1919, Siegbahn was internationally renowned as one of the leaders in his field and he was appointed directly as Rydberg’s successor without having to apply for the position. Mysterious rays On one of his European trips, Siegbahn visited Professor Wilhelm Röntgen. Just over ten years previously, Röntgen had reported the discovery of a mysterious, penetrating type of ray. On the top floor of the Department of Physics in Würzburg, Röntgen had his private quarters, and on the ground floor was the department laboratory. On the afternoon of 8 November 1895, Röntgen went down to his laboratory in Würzburg and here he describes what he saw: [...] The vacuum tube is surrounded by a fairly close-fitting shield of black paper; it is then possible to see, in a completely darkened room, that paper covered on one side with barium pla- tinocyanide lights up with brilliant fluorescence when brought into the neighbourhood of the tube, whether the painted side or the other be turned towards the tube. The fluorescence is still visible at two metres distance. In the early experiments, X-rays were generated in glass discharge tubes. The radiation was emitted from the anode (A on the drawing). The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 36 X-rays 37 Soon Röntgen could show that the rays not only penetrated paper screens, but also various types of material. He sent his report of these results to around 100 colleagues as a New Year’s greeting and soon after it was being cited in the world press. The discovery of X-rays led to intensive research around the world and Wilhelm Röntgen was awarded the first Nobel Prize for Physics in 1901. The first medical X-ray image, taken by Professor Wilhelm Röntgen of his wife Anna Bertha Ludwig’s hand with wedding ring. Wavelength measurements The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 38 Bragg’s law 39 Sir William Henry Bragg and William Lawrence Bragg Since X-rays behave like a wave motion, their wave- length can be measured. In 1913 Sir William Henry Bragg and William Lawrence Bragg (father and son) showed how the reflection in a crystal could be used to measure wavelengths. The formula for this came to be known as Bragg’s law. They received the 1915 Nobel Prize for Physics for this discovery. Using Bragg’s law it became possible to determine the wavelength of X-rays. In the shadow of the war In 1914 Englishman Henry Moseley had discovered a fundamental connection between atomic number and wavelength in the X-ray spectra of various elements. He had found that if the root of the frequency ν or √(1/ λ) is plotted against the element’s ordinal num- ber in the periodic table, a straight line is produced. Using this type of diagram and with the help of Niels Bohr’s theories, Moseley was able to draw the conclusion that the atomic number and the charge number of the nucleus, Ζ, were the same number. Atomic numbers became meaningful. In August 1915 Moseley was killed in action at Gallipoli. The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 40 X-ray tubes and spectrometers 41 In Lund, Manne Siegbahn had followed the deve- lopments in the new research field that opened up. Siegbahn realised that Moseley’s work should be continued and expanded to more elements and other wavelength regions. Spectrometers with the entire radiation path in a vacuum made it possible to observe spectra on longer wavelengths than previously. With a new method, Siegbahn was also able to increase the accuracy of the measurements by over 100 times. With higher resolution, many new com- ponents were discovered in the groups of lines that had previously been observed. Designers and instrument makers One of Siegbahn’s pupils, Arvid Leide, wrote that the successes were due to: … Siegbahn’s personal qualities as an in- genious and inspiring teacher, his scientific intuition and his lucky eye for design. X-ray tubes, spectrometers and vacuum pumps were manufactured at the department, initially by caretaker A L Pedersen and later by a specially employed precision instru- ment maker A S Ahlström. Alfred S Ahlström, had his workshop on Stora Fiskaregatan 8 in a dark room in the yard. The same room contained work- shop, storeroom, kitchen and bed. He had introduced a flat rate and all repairs cost 1 krona and 25 öre regardless of how long they took to carry out. If the repair was particularly amusing or interesting then the work was free. The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 42 New discoveries 43 Manne Siegbahn had a rare ability to attract talented doctoral students. In the years 1914 – 1925, no fewer than 15 doctoral theses were published, several of which were of epoch- making significance. The projects comprised systematic studies and precision measurements of X-ray spectra throughout the periodic table. Two groups of spectral lines had previously been observed in each element, called the K series and the L series. Using the new spec- trometers, it was found that the L series contai- ned many more lines than had previously been Siegbahns own photographic spectra with observed. In 1916 Siegbahn discovered a new the L series in four different elements. group of lines at longer wavelengths, which be- came known as the M series. A new measurement method and the precision scale engraved on the lower part of the spectro- meter, gave the great improvement in accuracy. Bohr’s model of the atom In 1913 Niels Bohr had presented his model of the atom. With this model it was possible in principle to explain how the characteristic X-ray lines came about. In the X-ray tube, an electron is knocked out of an inner electron shell. The space is filled by an electron from an outer shell and the surplus energy is emit- ted as an X-ray. Bohr’s model could also be used to explain the connection between wavelengths and atomic numbers discovered by Moseley. However, the many new spectral lines obser- ved with Siegbahn’s high-resolution spectro- meters could not be explained. The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 44 Sommerfeld’s ellipses 45 In order to improve the model of the atom, Arnold Sommerfeld (German mathemati- cian and theoretical physicist) assumed that the electrons moved in elliptical trajectories around the atomic nucleus instead of in Bohr’s circular trajectories. Sommerfeld’s elliptical electron trajectories assumed that many of the X-ray lines – as observed – were divided into a number of components. Now precision measurements were needed that could only be performed in Lund. In order to access accurate data, Arnold Sommerfeld corresponded with Manne Siegbahn.The eyes of the atomic physi- cists were on Lund. In a general presentation that Siegbahn held in autumn 1918, he said: Based on our precise measurements, Sommerfeld has proved that his formula is generally correct. Measurements now exist that make it possible to check the value of his formula even more precisely. International attention The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 46 New effects 47 Nobel Prize In 1922, the chair of physics in Uppsala became vacant, and, as previously in Lund, Siegbahn was offered the post without having to apply. He accepted and left Lund in 1923. In 1925 Manne Siegbahn was awarded the dormant 1924 Nobel Prize for Physics for his discoveries and research in the field of X-ray spectroscopy. In 1936 the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences established a research institute for physics in Stockholm and Manne Siegbahn was appointed head of the institute. The primary focus of the research there was on nuclear physics. The Nobel Prize Laureate who disappeared 48 Table of content >> Next chapter >>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating Achievement from Fame
    Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating achievement from fame Every schoolboy has heard of Einstein; fewer have heard of Antoine Becquerel; almost nobody has heard of Nils Dalén. Yet they all won Nobel Prizes for Physics. Can we gauge a scientist’s achievements by his or her fame? If so, how? And how do fighter pilots help? Mikhail Simkin and Vwani Roychowdhury look for the linkages. “It was a famous victory.” We instinctively rank the had published. However, in 2001–2002 popular French achievements of great men and women by how famous TV presenters Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff published they are. But is instinct enough? And how exactly does a great man’s fame relate to the greatness of his achieve- ment? Some achievements are easy to quantify. Such is the case with fighter pilots of the First World War. Their achievements can be easily measured and ranked, in terms of their victories – the number of enemy planes they shot down. These aces achieved varying degrees of fame, which have lasted down to the internet age. A few years ago we compared1 the fame of First World War fighter pilot aces (measured in Google hits) with their achievement (measured in victories); and we found that We can estimate fame grows exponentially with achievement. fame from Google; Is the same true in other areas of excellence? Bagrow et al. have studied the relationship between can this tell us 2 achievement and fame for physicists . The relationship Manfred von Richthofen (in cockpit) with members of his so- about actual they found was linear.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Fragmentation Reactions: from Basic Research to Medical Applications Igor N
    Nuclear fragmentation reactions: from basic research to medical applications Igor N. Mishustin Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies (FIAS), J.W. Goethe Universität, Frankfurt am Main National Research Center “Kurchatov Institute”, Moscow Part 1: Introduction: Nuclear break-up processes Basic Research Statistical description of nuclear break-up Multifragmentation of nuclei Nuclear Liquid-Gas phase transition Applications Propagation of heavy ions through extended medium Cancer therapy with ion beams Transmutation of radioactive waste Conclusions Introduction: Nuclear break-up processes, historical remarks Anticipation of nuclear “explosions” Nobel prize in Physics (1922) “for his services in the investigation of the structure of atoms and of Niels Bohr (1885 – 1962) the radiation emanating from them" Evaporation/fission of compound nucleus t=0 fm/c t>1000 fm/c p A CN low excitation fission Compound Nucleus (CN) is an equilibrated hot nucleus whose excitation energy is distributed over many microscopic d.o.f. (introduced by Niels Bohr in 1936-39) Sequential evaporation model—Weiskopf 1937, Statistical fission model—Bohr-Wheeler 1939, Frenkel 1939 Nuclear break-up: multifragmentation t=0 fm/c t>100 fm/c p A pA collision spectator A or B spectator A moderate excitation peripheral spectator AB collision B slow expansion equilibrated system at freeze-out Power-low fragment mass distribution around critical point, Y(A)~A-τ Can be well understood within an equilibrium statistical approach Early 80s: Randrup&Koonin, D.H.E. Gross et al, Bondorf-Mishustin-Botvina, Hahn&Stoecker; Later: S. Das Gupta et al., Gulminelli et al, Raduta et al,... Explosive disintegration of nuclei t ≈ R/v < 50 fm/c t = 0 fm/c f hot foreball central AA collision compression+heating E>50 AMeV collective flow fast expansion of fragments Typically, exponential fragment mass distributions, Y(A)~exp(-bA) The stronger is flow-the smaller are fragments-mechanical rupture Dynamical modeling is required: QMD, IQMD, NMD, AMD, ..
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Bragg's “Brainwave” Drives Father-Son Collaboration
    www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin HISTORICAL NOTE Lawrence Bragg’s “Brainwave” Drives Father-Son Collaboration In 1912, some 17 years after the serendip- and quickly began to learn what he could itous discovery of x-rays by Wilhelm on the subject. Röntgen, a debate raged as to the wave or Until this point in his life, at age 42, particle nature of this radiation phenome- William later recalled, “It had never non. William Henry Bragg, a 50-year-old entered my head that I should do any professor of physics at Leeds University in research work.” His curiosity aroused by England, came down firmly on the side of his reading on radiation, he soon obtained particles, citing the bullet-like nature of the some radium samples and began the rays, and how they were preferentially experiments that were to make him a lead- scattered in the forward direction when ing figure in radiation theory in a few colliding with matter. Max von Laue of years’ time. He quickly developed novel Germany, having produced elegant spot- hypotheses about the nature of radioactiv- diffraction photographs of CuS by aiming ity. The penetrating power of x-rays, and x-rays at crystal samples, used the diffrac- the fact that they are not deflected by a tion behavior as evidence for the wave magnetic field, were accounted for by the argument. Experiments by Charles G. “neutral pair hypothesis,” which stated Barkla that demonstrated the polarization that x-rays consisted of “an electron which of x-rays confirmed the wave theory in the has assumed a cloak of darkness in the minds of many scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • (Owen Willans) Richardson
    O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson: An Inventory of His Papers at the Harry Ransom Center Descriptive Summary Creator: Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 Title: O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson Papers Dates: 1898-1958 (bulk 1920-1940) Extent: 112 document boxes, 2 oversize boxes (49.04 linear feet), 1 oversize folder (osf), 5 galley folders (gf) Abstract: The papers of Sir O. W. (Owen Willans) Richardson, the Nobel Prize-winning British physicist who pioneered the field of thermionics, contain research materials and drafts of his writings, correspondence, as well as letters and writings from numerous distinguished fellow scientists. Call Number: MS-3522 Language: Primarily English; some works and correspondence written in French, German, or Italian . Note: The Ransom Center gratefully acknowledges the assistance of the Center for History of Physics, American Institute of Physics, which provided funds to support the processing and cataloging of this collection. Access: Open for research Administrative Information Additional The Richardson Papers were microfilmed and are available on 76 Physical Format reels. Each item has a unique identifying number (W-xxxx, L-xxxx, Available: R-xxxx, or M-xxxx) that corresponds to the microfilm. This number was recorded on the file folders housing the papers and can also be found on catalog slips present with each item. Acquisition: Purchase, 1961 (R43, R44) and Gift, 2005 Processed by: Tessa Klink and Joan Sibley, 2014 Repository: The University of Texas at Austin, Harry Ransom Center Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 2 Richardson, O. W. (Owen Willans), 1879-1959 MS-3522 Biographical Sketch The English physicist Owen Willans Richardson, who pioneered the field of thermionics, was also known for his work on photoelectricity, spectroscopy, ultraviolet and X-ray radiation, the electron theory, and quantum theory.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 X-Ray Diffraction Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department Of
    x-ray diffraction Masatsugu Sei Suzuki Department of Physics, SUNY at Binghamton (Date: January 13, 2012) Sir William Henry Bragg OM, KBE, PRS] (2 July 1862 – 10 March 1942) was a British physicist, chemist, mathematician and active sportsman who uniquely shared a Nobel Prize with his son William Lawrence Bragg - the 1915 Nobel Prize in Physics. The mineral Braggite is named after him and his son. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Henry_Bragg ________________________________________________________________________ Sir William Lawrence Bragg CH OBE MC FRS (31 March 1890 – 1 July 1971) was an Australian-born British physicist and X-ray crystallographer, discoverer (1912) of the Bragg law of X-ray diffraction, which is basic for the determination of crystal structure. He was joint winner (with his father, Sir William Bragg) of the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1915. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Lawrence_Bragg 1 1. x-ray source Fig. Schematic diagram for the generation of x-rays. Metal target (Cu or Mo) is bombarded by accelerating electrons. The power of the system is given by P = I(mA) V(keV), where I is the current of cathode and V is the voltage between the anode and cathode. Typically, we have I = 30 mA and V = 50 kV: P = 1.5 kW. We use two kinds of targets to generate x-rays: Cu and Mo. The wavelength of CuK1, CuK2 and CuK lines are given by K1 1.540562 Å. K 2 = 1.544390 Å, K = 1.392218 Å. The intensity ratio of CuK1 and CuK2 lines is 2:1. The weighed average wavelength K is calculated as 2 K 1 K 2 = 1.54184 Å.
    [Show full text]
  • Lsu-Physics Iq Test 3 Strikes You're
    LSU-PHYSICS IQ TEST 3 STRIKES YOU'RE OUT For Physics Block Party on 9 September 2016: This was run where all ~70 people start answering each question, given out one-by-one. Every time a person missed an answer, they made a 'strike'. All was done with the Honor System for answers, plus a fairly liberal statement of what constitutes a correct answer. When the person accumulates three strikes, then they are out of the game. The game continue until only one person was left standing. Actually, there had to be one extra question to decide a tie-break between 2nd and 3rd place. The prizes were: FIRST PLACE: Ravi Rau, selecting an Isaac Newton 'action figure' SECOND PLACE: Juhan Frank, selecting an Albert Einstein action figure THIRD PLACE: Siddhartha Das, winning a Mr. Spock action figure. 1. What is Einstein's equation relating mass and energy? E=mc2 OK, I knew in advance that someone would blurt out the answer loudly, and this did happen. So this was a good question to make sure that the game flowed correctly. 2. What is the short name for the physics paradox depicted on the back of my Physics Department T-shirt? Schroedinger's Cat 3. Give the name of one person new to our Department. This could be staff, student, or professor. There are many answers, for example with the new profs being Tabatha Boyajian, Kristina Launey, Manos Chatzopoulos, and Robert Parks. Many of the people asked 'Can I just use myself?', with the answer being "Sure". 4. What Noble Gas is named after the home planet of Kal-El? Krypton.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Zero, Absolute Temperature. Absolute Zero Is the Lowest
    Contents Radioactivity: The First Puzzles................................................ 1 The “Uranic Rays” of Henri Becquerel .......................................... 1 The Discovery ............................................................... 2 Is It Really Phosphorescence? .............................................. 4 What Is the Nature of the Radiation?....................................... 5 A Limited Impact on Scientists and the Public ............................ 6 Why 1896? .................................................................. 7 Was Radioactivity Discovered by Chance? ................................ 7 Polonium and Radium............................................................. 9 Marya Skłodowska .......................................................... 9 Pierre Curie .................................................................. 10 Polonium and Radium: Pierre and Marie Curie Invent Radiochemistry.. 11 Enigmas...................................................................... 14 Emanation from Thorium ......................................................... 17 Ernest Rutherford ........................................................... 17 Rutherford Studies Radioactivity: ˛-and ˇ-Rays.......................... 18 ˇ-Rays Are Electrons ....................................................... 19 Rutherford in Montreal: The Radiation of Thorium, the Exponential Decrease........................................... 19 “Induced” and “Excited” Radioactivity .................................... 20 Elster
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobel Prize in Physics and Lise Meitner
    The Nobel Prize in Physics and Lise Meitner Ringvorlesung Zum Gedenken an Lise Meitner 2018/19 FU, Berlin, 4 February 2019 Karl Grandin, KVA – CVH “The women who were swindled out of the Nobel Prize” Questions • Is Lise Meitner forgotten? • Why did she chose Sweden? • No support in Sweden? • Was she counteracted by Manne Siegbahn? • Why did she not get the Nobel Prize in 1945 (1946, 1947)? • What happened then? Lise Meitner to Margarethe Bohr 25/11-1945 ”Du weisst ja, dass ich immer das Gefühl habe, das ich mit meiner ganzen Art nicht nach Schweden passe und ich habe auch noch keinen schwedischen Physiker getroffen”. Eva von Bahr and Lise Meitner in Berlin Eva von Bahr at Uppsala Physics institute Oskar Klein and Niels Bohr Atomic bombs over Hiroshima 6 August and over Nagasaki 9 August 1945 The Research institute for experimental physics of the Swedish Academy of Sciences, 1937– Manne Siegbahn Eva von Bahr-Bergius to Carl Wilhelm Oseen 31/1-1939 ”It doesn't seem possible to get any [assistant] now and Lise sounds rather unhappy. She says, she feels like a charlatan, who receives money [from the Nobel Committee 5,400 SEK + Eva vB-B], although she cannot accomplish much, and her life seems to her completely pointless. […] If she for the past two years had not been so unaccustomed to simpler technical work such as glass blowing, soldering etc. that she now cannot cope with such.” Carl Wilhelm Oseenen to Eva von Bahr-BergiusBahr 2/2-1939 ”Is it true what L.M. says, that it is an assistant she needs? Isn't it rather so, that what she needs is a - even with regard to staff - fully equipped institute, as whose brain she could be? The quote that you mentioned, seems to me, to point quite firmly in this direction.
    [Show full text]
  • William Henry Bragg 1862 - 1942 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1915
    William Henry Bragg 1862 - 1942 Awarded the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1915 William Henry Bragg was a pioneer British scientist in solid- state physics. He was born on July 2, 1862, in Wigton, Cumberland, England. Bragg's father came from a family of farmers and merchant seamen. His mother, a sweet and kind woman, was the daughter of the local vicar. He did not remember her very well, as she died when he was about seven. The small boy was taken to the family of his uncle, the owner of a pharmacy and grocery shop. In 1875 his father took him back and sent him to school at King William’s College, Isle of Man. Bragg was good in his lessons and sports and became the head boy. He was fond of all games and played them rather well. In 1881 Bragg tried for Cambridge University,but the first interview was not a success, and he had to return to school.After the next attempt he was granted a scholarship to Trinity College. Here he worked very hard at mathematics and two years later obtained third place in the final Both he and his son examination. Bragg played tennis and hockey well. His teacher was the famous physicist J.J. lectured at the Royal Thomson with whom he also played tennis. Thomson advised him to send an application for the Institution post of professor of mathematics and physics at Adelaide University in Australia. After an interview Bragg was appointed and went to Australia where he began his career. In Adelaide the young professor became one of the best lecturers and a brilliant experimentalist.
    [Show full text]
  • Ottokar A.A. Tumlirz (Prague, 1879) Arthur March (Innsbruck, 1913
    EUROPEAN TREES#1 c Dr. John Andraos, 2002 Bert R. Bolin Theophile de Donder Martinus W. Beijerinck Rydberg constant, formula, state (Stockholm, 1956) (Brussels, 1899) (Chem. Eng. 1872, TU Delft) Rydberg transition, orbital (1890) Paul J. Crutzen Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn Ilya Prigogine G. van Iterson, Jr. Formation and decomposition Theory of non-equilibrium (TU Delft) X-ray spectroscopy of ozone in the atmosphere thermodynamics; theory of Physics Nobel 1924 Chemistry Nobel 1995 dissipative structures Chemistry Nobel 1977 Albert J. Kluyver (TU Delft, 1914) Kai Manne Siegbahn Svedberg unit for Debye-Waller factor Hannes O.G. Alfven sedimentation (1925) (1923 - 1927) Development of high- Magneto-hydrodynamics; Leon Charles van Hove resolution electron Invention of centrifuge; (U Libre de Bruxelles, 1946) plasma physics Colloid chemistry; Brownian Cornelius B. van Niel microscopy Physics Nobel 1970 (TU Delft, 1928) Loewdin Physics Nobel 1981 motion orthogonalization Chemistry Nobel 1926 Martinus J.G. Veltman (1950) Geraldus 'T. Hooft Elucidation of quantum structure Entner-Doudoroff Eilhard Wiedemann Ottokar A.A. Tumlirz Arne Tiselius pathway (1952) Electrophoresis (1958) of electroweak interactions Robert Schiff (Leipzig, 1872/3) (Prague, 1879) Physics Nobel 1999 (Zurich, 1876) Chemistry Nobel 1948 Nils Svartholm Rijke acoustic tubes (1859) Hans W. Geiger Arthur March Gerhardus J. Mulder Mario G. Betti (Erlangen, 1906) (Innsbruck, 1913) (Utrecht, 1825? MD) (Pisa, 1897) Lorentzian function, Hubert Krueger Petrus J. van Kerckhoff Kai Manne
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Bragg's
    www.mrs.org/publications/bulletin HISTORICAL NOTE Lawrence Bragg’s “Brainwave” Drives Father-Son Collaboration In 1912, some 17 years after the serendip- and quickly began to learn what he could itous discovery of x-rays by Wilhelm on the subject. Röntgen, a debate raged as to the wave or Until this point in his life, at age 42, particle nature of this radiation phenome- William later recalled, “It had never non. William Henry Bragg, a 50-year-old entered my head that I should do any professor of physics at Leeds University in research work.” His curiosity aroused by England, came down firmly on the side of his reading on radiation, he soon obtained particles, citing the bullet-like nature of the some radium samples and began the rays, and how they were preferentially experiments that were to make him a lead- scattered in the forward direction when ing figure in radiation theory in a few colliding with matter. Max von Laue of years’ time. He quickly developed novel Germany, having produced elegant spot- hypotheses about the nature of radioactiv- diffraction photographs of CuS by aiming ity. The penetrating power of x-rays, and x-rays at crystal samples, used the diffrac- the fact that they are not deflected by a tion behavior as evidence for the wave magnetic field, were accounted for by the argument. Experiments by Charles G. “neutral pair hypothesis,” which stated Barkla that demonstrated the polarization that x-rays consisted of “an electron which of x-rays confirmed the wave theory in the has assumed a cloak of darkness in the minds of many scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • European Physical Society Exec
    August 1994 European Physical Society Exec. Sec.: G. Thomas Council Meetings Geneva Secretariat: Location: Budapest Secretariat: 1995: 31 March-1 April, Bad Honnef P. O. Box 69 27, chemin de la Vendée Nádor u.7 1996: 29-30 March, Lisbon CH -1213 Petit-Lancy 2 Petit-Lancy, Geneva H-1051 Budapest 1997: 21-22 March, The Netherlands Tl: +41 (22) 793 11 30 Access: Tl: +36 (1) 117 35 10 1998: 27-28 March Fx: +41 (22) 793 13 17 Chemin du Banc-Bénit Fx: +36 (1) 117 68 17 1999: 26-27 March Past Presidents IOM Delegates to Council 1968-70: G. Bernardini, Pisa 1982-84: J. Friedel, Orsay Delegates are elected by a ballot of the Individual Ordinary Members (4168 were 1970-72: E. Rudberg, Stockholm 1984-86: G.H. Stafford, on the Society’s books on 1 August 1994) for a four-year term of office from nomi­ 1972-76: H.B.G. Casimir, Oxford nations signed by at least three IOM’s. The term of office ends if the Delegate is Eindhoven 1986-88: W. Buckel, Karlsruhe elected to the Executive Committee. A former Delegate may serve again after three 1976-78: I. Ursu, Bucharest 1988-91: R.A. Ricci, Legnaro years have lapsed. 1978-80: A. Zichichi, Bologna 1991-93: M. Jacob, Geneva G. Benedek, Dip. di Fisica dell’Università, Via Celoria, 16, I-20133 Milan 1980-82: A.R. Mackintosh, 1993- : N. Kroó, Budapest {+39 (2) 239 24 09 / 239 24 14; benedek @ milano.infn.it} Copenhagen K. Bethge, Inst. für Kernphysik, Universität Frankfurt, August-Euler-Str.
    [Show full text]