DOCSLIB.ORG

Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating Achievement from Fame

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating Achievement from Fame Von Richthofen, Einstein and the AGA Estimating achievement from fame Every schoolboy has heard of Einstein; fewer have heard of Antoine Becquerel; almost nobody has heard of Nils Dalén. Yet they all won Nobel Prizes for Physics. Can we gauge a scientist’s achievements by his or her fame? If so, how? And how do fighter pilots help? Mikhail Simkin and Vwani Roychowdhury look for the linkages. “It was a famous victory.” We instinctively rank the had published. However, in 2001–2002 popular French achievements of great men and women by how famous TV presenters Igor and Grichka Bogdanoff published they are. But is instinct enough? And how exactly does a great man’s fame relate to the greatness of his achieve- ment? Some achievements are easy to quantify. Such is the case with fighter pilots of the First World War. Their achievements can be easily measured and ranked, in terms of their victories – the number of enemy planes they shot down. These aces achieved varying degrees of fame, which have lasted down to the internet age. A few years ago we compared1 the fame of First World War fighter pilot aces (measured in Google hits) with their achievement (measured in victories); and we found that We can estimate fame grows exponentially with achievement. fame from Google; Is the same true in other areas of excellence? Bagrow et al. have studied the relationship between can this tell us 2 achievement and fame for physicists . The relationship Manfred von Richthofen (in cockpit) with members of his so- about actual they found was linear. The measure of achievement used called “flying circus”, 1917. Source: Deutsches Bundesarchiv achievement? in that study was the number of papers the physicists (German Federal Archive) 22 march2011 © 2011 The Royal Statistical Society five papers in a number of respectable journals 10000 enemy aircraft each pilot shot down. For our including Classical and Quantum Gravity3 fighter aces, therefore, we can measure both and Annals of Physics. The problem was that fame (in Google hits) and real achievement di- their papers consisted of incoherent streams of 1000 rectly. We can also estimate each ace’s achieve- buzzwords from modern physics. Their affair ment from his fame, using equation (2). casts doubt on using the number of published For every ace we computed this estimate papers to measure scientific achievement. How, of achievement. We then compared it to his 100 then, can we measure it? real achievement. Our estimates did not turn Some have used the number of citations out to be very accurate. With 50% probability of the scientist’s papers as a true measure of our estimated achievement was between 0.7 4 5, 6 10 achievement . But in another study we have Googlehits) of (number ame and 1.44 of real achievement. And with 85% shown that this measure is also question- F probability the real achievement was between able, since citations multiply by mere copying. 0.5 and 2 times the estimate. Even these crude There is a cascade effect. If scientist A is cited 1 estimates, however, can provide some insight in paper B, then a third author citing B may 5 25 45 65 85 in the fields where we have no clue of how to Achievement (number of victories) include in it a citation of A as well; and if our measure achievement – such as in physics. third author gets cited in turn, D may cite not Figure 1. A scatter plot of fame versus achievement for 392 German First World War aces. The correlation only C but anything that C cites, including B 2 coefficient of 0.72 suggests that 0.72 ≈ 52% of the What is achievement in physics? and A – even if he has not actually read A’s variation in fame is explained by the variation in paper at all. While the number of citations achievement. The straight line is the fit using Eq.1 with So let us now try to estimate the achievement may be increasing with the size of scientific C ≈ 5.3 and b ≈ 0.72. There are many aces with identical of different physicists based on their fame. contribution made in the paper, the exact rela- values of both achievement and fame. Therefore, for Table 1 shows the names of 45 Nobel Laure- display purposes random numbers between 0 and 1 tion between these variables is not obvious. So were added to every value of achievement and fame. ates in Physics before the Second World War, again, finding a measure of achievements of This way the scatter plot represents the true density ranked according to their fame. (The only win- physicists is a problem. of the data points ner excluded is Charles Wilson, whose Nobel Here, we made the hypothesis that the Prize was awarded in 1927; he has so many exponential relationship between fame and fame, we can try to estimate achievement, by namesakes that Googling his name reflects the achievement that we found for fighter pilots simply inverting equation (1): fame of too many other people as well.) Figure holds also for people of other professions, such 2 shows the probability density of their fame Achievement = ln(Fame/C)/b (2) as scientists. We can then use the scientists’ distribution, and how it is very similar to the fame (measured in Google hits) to infer their We will first see how accurately it works fame distribution of aces. We hypothesize that achievement. Let us emphasise that we do not using the aces data, where we do know both the relation between achievement and fame for insist that web hit counts are preferable to fame and achievement. We looked at 392 physicists is, as with aces, given by equation citation counts. These two measures of fame German First World War fighter pilots1. Their (2). A big difference from the case of aces is are strongly correlated. We used web hits achievements were easy to quantify, since ac- that we do not know the values of b and C. because we used them for fighter pilots aces in curate historical data exists for the number of The fact that b is unknown is irrelevant, as it our earlier study. The point of this article is not that one should use web hits, but that to make Fame (Google hits) Fame (Google hits) 4 5 6 7 8 an estimate of achievement one should take a 1 10 100 1000 10000 10 10 10 10 10 –1 5 logarithm of fame. 10 10 In our study of fighter pilots1 we found –2 that fame, F, depends on achievement, A, ac- 10 6 cording to the following equation: 10 –3 Fame = C × exp(b × Achievement) (1) 10 Here b and are parameters determined by C 7 –4 10 regression. C turns out to be about 5.3, and b 10 is about 0.72. To be precise, the real data of fame as a function of achievement present not –5 10 Probability density Probability density 8 a smooth curve, but a scatter plot (see Figure 10 1) and equation (1) gives the curve that is the –6 best fit to it. It is not a perfect fit; nonetheless, 10 given the value of achievement, we can use the 9 10 –7 equation to greatly reduce the uncertainty in 10 the value of fame. Similarly, given the value of Figure 2. Distribution of fame of First World War aces (left) and Nobel Prize winning physicists (right). Solid lines are power-law fits with exponent 1.9 and 1.5, respectively march2011 23 Table 1. Winners of the Nobel Prize for Physics before the Second World War, ranked by fame Physicist Alternative names used in Google June 2008 Log over Lower bound on the most search, all joined using OR Google hits Dalén likely achievement in einsteins Albert Einstein 22,700,000 8.53 1 Max Planck Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck 10,600,000 7.77 0.911 Marie Curie 6,300,000 7.25 0.850 Niels Bohr 1,890,000 6.04 0.709 Enrico Fermi 1,730,000 5.95 0.698 Guglielmo Marconi 1,110,000 5.51 0.646 Werner Heisenberg 987,000 5.39 0.632 Erwin Schrödinger Erwin Schroedinger 375,000 4.43 0.519 Pierre Curie 330,000 4.30 0.504 Wilhelm Röntgen Wilhelm Conrad Röntgen 272,000 4.10 0.481 Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen Wilhelm Roentgen Paul Dirac Paul Adrien Maurice Dirac 255,000 4.04 0.474 Paul A.M. Dirac Louis de Broglie Louis-Victor de Broglie 201,000 3.80 0.446 Lord Rayleigh Lord John William Strutt Rayleigh 167,000 3.62 0.424 Max von Laue 142,000 3.45 0.405 Hendrik Lorentz Hendrik Antoon Lorentz 119,000 3.28 0.384 Robert Millikan Robert Andrews Millikan 112,000 3.22 0.377 James Franck 109,000 3.19 0.374 James Chadwick 99,100 3.09 0.363 Charles Guillaume Charles Edouard Guillaume 89,900 3.00 0.351 Ernest Orlando Lawrence 89,500 2.99 0.351 Albert Michelson Albert Abraham Michelson 76,600 2.84 0.333 William Lawrence Bragg 74,500 2.81 0.329 Joseph John Thomson 73,700 2.80 0.328 Antoine Becquerel Antoine Henri Becquerel 70,300 2.75 0.323 Arthur Compton Arthur Holly Compton 66,800 2.70 0.317 Wilhelm Wien 52,600 2.46 0.289 Gabriel Lippmann 49,300 2.40 0.281 Johannes van der Waals Johannes Diderik van der Waals 48,800 2.39 0.280 Pieter Zeeman 47,200 2.35 0.276 William Henry Bragg 46,800 2.34 0.275 Johannes Stark 45,900 2.32 0.273 Manne Siegbahn Karl Manne Georg Siegbahn 45,000 2.30 0.270 Philipp Lenard Philipp Eduard Anton Lenard 40,000 2.19 0.256 Carl Ferdinand Braun Karl Ferdinand Braun 40,000 2.19 0.256 Gustav Hertz 37,800 2.13 0.250 Heike Kamerlingh Onnes 35,100 2.06 0.241 Sir George Thomson George Paget Thomson 29,900 1.90 0.222 Clinton Davisson Clinton Joseph Davisson 29,100 1.87 0.219 Jean Baptiste Perrin 28,600 1.85 0.217 Carl David Anderson 26,400 1.77 0.208 Owen Richardson Willans Richardson 24,900 1.71 0.201 Charles Barkla Charles Glover Barkla 24,500 1.70 0.199 Chandrasekhara Raman Chandrasekhara Venkata Raman 22,100 1.59 0.187 Victor Franz Hess 17,200 1.34 0.157 Nils Dalén Nils Gustaf Dalén 4,490 0.00 0 Nils Gustaf Dalen 24 march2011 cancels out from the ratio of achievements, but rural kitchen, the AGA stove.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hendrik Antoon Lorentz's Struggle with Quantum Theory A. J
    Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Archive for History of Exact Sciences ISSN 0003-9519 Volume 67 Number 2 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149-170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 1 23 Your article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution license which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works, as long as the author of the original work is cited. You may self- archive this article on your own website, an institutional repository or funder’s repository and make it publicly available immediately. 1 23 Arch. Hist. Exact Sci. (2013) 67:149–170 DOI 10.1007/s00407-012-0107-8 Hendrik Antoon Lorentz’s struggle with quantum theory A. J. Kox Received: 15 June 2012 / Published online: 24 July 2012 © The Author(s) 2012. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract A historical overview is given of the contributions of Hendrik Antoon Lorentz in quantum theory. Although especially his early work is valuable, the main importance of Lorentz’s work lies in the conceptual clarifications he provided and in his critique of the foundations of quantum theory. 1 Introduction The Dutch physicist Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853–1928) is generally viewed as an icon of classical, nineteenth-century physics—indeed, as one of the last masters of that era. Thus, it may come as a bit of a surprise that he also made important contribu- tions to quantum theory, the quintessential non-classical twentieth-century develop- ment in physics. The importance of Lorentz’s work lies not so much in his concrete contributions to the actual physics—although some of his early work was ground- breaking—but rather in the conceptual clarifications he provided and his critique of the foundations and interpretations of the new ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Julie Brown, CTO of UDC, Awarded Prestigious 2020 Karl Ferdinand Braun Prize from the Society of Information Display
    8/3/2020 Dr. Julie Brown, CTO of UDC, Awarded Prestigious 2020 Karl Ferdinand Braun Prize from the Society of Information Display Dr. Mike Weaver, VP of UDC, Honored with 2020 SID Fellow Award EWING, N.J.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Universal Display Corporation (Nasdaq: OLED), enabling energy-efficient displays and lighting with its UniversalPHOLED® technology and materials, today announced that Dr. Julie Brown, Senior Vice President and Chief Technical Officer, was awarded the 2020 Karl Ferdinand Braun Prize by the Society of Information Display (SID). Additionally, Dr. Mike Weaver, Vice President of PHOLED R&D, was named a 2020 SID Fellow. The Karl Ferdinand Braun Prize was awarded to Dr. Brown for her outstanding technical achievements and contributions to the development and commercialization of phosphorescent OLED materials and display technology. The Society for Information Display created this prize in 1987 in honor of the German physicist and Nobel Laureate Karl Ferdinand Braun who invented the cathode-ray tube (CRT). Dr. Brown has been a leading innovator in the discovery and development of state-of-the-art OLED technologies and materials for display and lighting applications for over two decades, and is the first woman to be awarded this prestigious prize. Joining Universal Display (UDC) in 1998, Dr. Brown leads a global team of unique chemists, physicists and engineers and spearheads the R&D vision of UDC, from its start-up years to its successful commercial present, and continues to create and shape the Company’s innovation strategy for its future growth. The distinction of Fellow honors an SID member of outstanding qualifications and experience as a scientist or engineer in the field of information display.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Extraction in Numerical Relativity
    Doctoral Dissertation Wave Extraction in Numerical Relativity Dissertation zur Erlangung des naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades der Bayrischen Julius-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Wurzburg¨ vorgelegt von Oliver Elbracht aus Warendorf Institut fur¨ Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik Fakultat¨ fur¨ Physik und Astronomie Julius-Maximilians-Universitat¨ Wurzburg¨ Wurzburg,¨ August 2009 Eingereicht am: 27. August 2009 bei der Fakultat¨ fur¨ Physik und Astronomie 1. Gutachter:Prof.Dr.Karl Mannheim 2. Gutachter:Prof.Dr.Thomas Trefzger 3. Gutachter:- der Dissertation. 1. Prufer¨ :Prof.Dr.Karl Mannheim 2. Prufer¨ :Prof.Dr.Thomas Trefzger 3. Prufer¨ :Prof.Dr.Thorsten Ohl im Promotionskolloquium. Tag des Promotionskolloquiums: 26. November 2009 Doktorurkunde ausgehandigt¨ am: Gewidmet meinen Eltern, Gertrud und Peter, f¨urall ihre Liebe und Unterst¨utzung. To my parents Gertrud and Peter, for all their love, encouragement and support. Wave Extraction in Numerical Relativity Abstract This work focuses on a fundamental problem in modern numerical rela- tivity: Extracting gravitational waves in a coordinate and gauge independent way to nourish a unique and physically meaningful expression. We adopt a new procedure to extract the physically relevant quantities from the numerically evolved space-time. We introduce a general canonical form for the Weyl scalars in terms of fundamental space-time invariants, and demonstrate how this ap- proach supersedes the explicit definition of a particular null tetrad. As a second objective, we further characterize a particular sub-class of tetrads in the Newman-Penrose formalism: the transverse frames. We establish a new connection between the two major frames for wave extraction: namely the Gram-Schmidt frame, and the quasi-Kinnersley frame. Finally, we study how the expressions for the Weyl scalars depend on the tetrad we choose, in a space-time containing distorted black holes.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophical Rhetoric in Early Quantum Mechanics, 1925-1927
    b1043_Chapter-2.4.qxd 1/27/2011 7:30 PM Page 319 b1043 Quantum Mechanics and Weimar Culture FA 319 Philosophical Rhetoric in Early Quantum Mechanics 1925–27: High Principles, Cultural Values and Professional Anxieties Alexei Kojevnikov* ‘I look on most general reasoning in science as [an] opportunistic (success- or unsuccessful) relationship between conceptions more or less defined by other conception[s] and helping us to overlook [danicism for “survey”] things.’ Niels Bohr (1919)1 This paper considers the role played by philosophical conceptions in the process of the development of quantum mechanics, 1925–1927, and analyses stances taken by key participants on four main issues of the controversy (Anschaulichkeit, quantum discontinuity, the wave-particle dilemma and causality). Social and cultural values and anxieties at the time of general crisis, as identified by Paul Forman, strongly affected the language of the debate. At the same time, individual philosophical positions presented as strongly-held principles were in fact flexible and sometimes reversible to almost their opposites. One can understand the dynamics of rhetorical shifts and changing strategies, if one considers interpretational debates as a way * Department of History, University of British Columbia, 1873 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1; [email protected]. The following abbreviations are used: AHQP, Archive for History of Quantum Physics, NBA, Copenhagen; AP, Annalen der Physik; HSPS, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences; NBA, Niels Bohr Archive, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen; NW, Die Naturwissenschaften; PWB, Wolfgang Pauli, Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg a.o., Band I: 1919–1929, ed. A. Hermann, K.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein's Mistakes
    Einstein’s Mistakes Einstein was the greatest genius of the Twentieth Century, but his discoveries were blighted with mistakes. The Human Failing of Genius. 1 PART 1 An evaluation of the man Here, Einstein grows up, his thinking evolves, and many quotations from him are listed. Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at 14 Einstein at 26 Einstein at 42 3 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Einstein at age 61 (1940) 4 Albert Einstein (1879-1955) Born in Ulm, Swabian region of Southern Germany. From a Jewish merchant family. Had a sister Maja. Family rejected Jewish customs. Did not inherit any mathematical talent. Inherited stubbornness, Inherited a roguish sense of humor, An inclination to mysticism, And a habit of grüblen or protracted, agonizing “brooding” over whatever was on its mind. Leading to the thought experiment. 5 Portrait in 1947 – age 68, and his habit of agonizing brooding over whatever was on its mind. He was in Princeton, NJ, USA. 6 Einstein the mystic •“Everyone who is seriously involved in pursuit of science becomes convinced that a spirit is manifest in the laws of the universe, one that is vastly superior to that of man..” •“When I assess a theory, I ask myself, if I was God, would I have arranged the universe that way?” •His roguish sense of humor was always there. •When asked what will be his reactions to observational evidence against the bending of light predicted by his general theory of relativity, he said: •”Then I would feel sorry for the Good Lord. The theory is correct anyway.” 7 Einstein: Mathematics •More quotations from Einstein: •“How it is possible that mathematics, a product of human thought that is independent of experience, fits so excellently the objects of physical reality?” •Questions asked by many people and Einstein: •“Is God a mathematician?” •His conclusion: •“ The Lord is cunning, but not malicious.” 8 Einstein the Stubborn Mystic “What interests me is whether God had any choice in the creation of the world” Some broadcasters expunged the comment from the soundtrack because they thought it was blasphemous.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Nuclear Astrophysics
    A BRIEF HISTORY OF NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS PART I THE ENERGY OF THE SUN AND STARS Nikos Prantzos Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris Stellar Origin of Energy the Elements Nuclear Astrophysics Astronomy Nuclear Physics Thermodynamics: the energy of the Sun and the age of the Earth 1847 : Robert Julius von Mayer Sun heated by fall of meteors 1854 : Hermann von Helmholtz Gravitational energy of Kant’s contracting protosolar nebula of gas and dust turns into kinetic energy Timescale ~ EGrav/LSun ~ 30 My 1850s : William Thompson (Lord Kelvin) Sun heated at formation from meteorite fall, now « an incadescent liquid mass » cooling Age 10 – 100 My 1859: Charles Darwin Origin of species : Rate of erosion of the Weald valley is 1 inch/century or 22 miles wild (X 1100 feet high) in 300 My Such large Earth ages also required by geologists, like Charles Lyell A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J. Homer Lane ; 1880s :August Ritter : Sun gaseous Compressible As it shrinks, it releases gravitational energy AND it gets hotter Earth Mayer – Kelvin - Helmholtz Helmholtz - Ritter A gaseous, contracting and heating Sun 푀⊙ Mean solar density : ~1.35 g/cc Sun liquid Incompressible = 4 3 푅 3 ⊙ 1870s: J.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Linkage Between Planck's Quantum and Maxwell's Equations
    The Finnish Society for Natural Philosophy 25 years, K.V. Laurikainen Honorary Symposium, Helsinki 11.-12.11.2013 On the Linkage between Planck's Quantum and Maxwell's Equations Tuomo Suntola Physics Foundations Society, www.physicsfoundations.org Abstract The concept of quantum is one of the key elements of the foundations in modern physics. The term quantum is primarily identified as a discrete amount of something. In the early 20th century, the concept of quantum was needed to explain Max Planck’s blackbody radiation law which suggested that the elec- tromagnetic radiation emitted by atomic oscillators at the surfaces of a blackbody cavity appears as dis- crete packets with the energy proportional to the frequency of the radiation in the packet. The derivation of Planck’s equation from Maxwell’s equations shows quantizing as a property of the emission/absorption process rather than an intrinsic property of radiation; the Planck constant becomes linked to primary electrical constants allowing a unified expression of the energies of mass objects and electromagnetic radiation thereby offering a novel insight into the wave nature of matter. From discrete atoms to a quantum of radiation Continuity or discontinuity of matter has been seen as a fundamental question since antiquity. Aristotle saw perfection in continuity and opposed Democritus’s ideas of indivisible atoms. First evidences of atoms and molecules were obtained in chemistry as multiple proportions of elements in chemical reac- tions by the end of the 18th and in the early 19th centuries. For physicist, the idea of atoms emerged for more than half a century later, most concretely in statistical thermodynamics and kinetic gas theory that converted the mole-based considerations of chemists into molecule-based considerations based on con- servation laws and probabilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Nobel Prizes Social Network
    Nobel prizes social network Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Maurice de Broglie Louis de Broglie (Phys.1929) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Henri Becquerel (Phys.1903) Pierre Curie (Phys.1903) = Marie Skłodowska Curie (Phys.1903, Chem.1911) Paul Langevin Maurice de Broglie Louis de Broglie (Phys.1929) Irène Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) = Frédéric Joliot-Curie (Chem.1935) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Clinton Davisson (Phys.1937) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J. J. Thomson (Phys.1906) Owen Richardson (Phys.1928) Charlotte Richardson = Clinton Davisson (Phys.1937) Nobel prizes social network (more) Sir J.
    [Show full text]
  • Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922
    Einstein and the Early Theory of Superconductivity, 1919–1922 Tilman Sauer Einstein Papers Project California Institute of Technology 20-7 Pasadena, CA 91125, USA [email protected] Abstract Einstein’s early thoughts about superconductivity are discussed as a case study of how theoretical physics reacts to experimental find- ings that are incompatible with established theoretical notions. One such notion that is discussed is the model of electric conductivity implied by Drude’s electron theory of metals, and the derivation of the Wiedemann-Franz law within this framework. After summarizing the experimental knowledge on superconductivity around 1920, the topic is then discussed both on a phenomenological level in terms of implications of Maxwell’s equations for the case of infinite conduc- tivity, and on a microscopic level in terms of suggested models for superconductive charge transport. Analyzing Einstein’s manuscripts and correspondence as well as his own 1922 paper on the subject, it is shown that Einstein had a sustained interest in superconductivity and was well informed about the phenomenon. It is argued that his appointment as special professor in Leiden in 1920 was motivated to a considerable extent by his perception as a leading theoretician of quantum theory and condensed matter physics and the hope that he would contribute to the theoretical direction of the experiments done at Kamerlingh Onnes’ cryogenic laboratory. Einstein tried to live up to these expectations by proposing at least three experiments on the arXiv:physics/0612159v1 [physics.hist-ph] 15 Dec 2006 phenomenon, one of which was carried out twice in Leiden. Com- pared to other theoretical proposals at the time, the prominent role of quantum concepts was characteristic of Einstein’s understanding of the phenomenon.
    [Show full text]
  • Marischal College
    The Scientific Tourist: Aberdeen Marischal College George P Thomson – Nobel Prize winning physicist Sir George Paget Thomson FRS (1892-1975) was the only son of Sir J. J. Thomson, the Cavendish Professor of Physics who is probably most famous for discovering the existence of the electron and measuring its mass. G. P. Thomson was one of a select group of academics in the University of Aberdeen to be awarded the Nobel Prize. He earned it for his work in the Department of Natural Philosophy at Marischal College during his tenure from 1922-1930. There is now a commemorative plaque in the Marischal College quadrangle. Thomson was a high achieving Trinity College, Cambridge, scholar who graduated in 1913 and was elected Fellow and Lecturer at Corpus Christi College in the following year. He was, though, of the generation whose adult lives were to be shaped by two World Wars and their aftermaths. Thomson spent most of the First World War in France and in the research wing of the Royal Flying Corps. His first book1 came out of this experience and is simply entitled “Applied Aerodynamics”. It is a well-illustrated summary of the lessons of wartime work on the science of aircraft design and operation, underlining the basic physics involved. Upon Thomson’s return to Cambridge he took up research into his father’s long-standing interest of electrical discharges in gases. He brought this interest with him when he came to Aberdeen in 1922 and did much of the work enlarging J. J. Thomson’s “Conduction of Electricity through Gases” into a long awaited 3rd edition that was published in their joint names in 1928.
    [Show full text]
  • ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE Opened up the Science of Radioactivity
    ARIE SKLODOWSKA CURIE opened up the science of radioactivity. She is best known as the discoverer of the radioactive elements polonium and radium and as the first person to win two Nobel prizes. For scientists and the public, her radium was a key to a basic change in our understanding of matter and energy. Her work not only influenced the development of fundamental science but also ushered in a new era in medical research and treatment. This file contains most of the text of the Web exhibit “Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity” at http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm. You must visit the Web exhibit to explore hyperlinks within the exhibit and to other exhibits. Material in this document is copyright © American Institute of Physics and Naomi Pasachoff and is based on the book Marie Curie and the Science of Radioactivity by Naomi Pasachoff, Oxford University Press, copyright © 1996 by Naomi Pasachoff. Site created 2000, revised May 2005 http://www.aip.org/history/curie/contents.htm Page 1 of 79 Table of Contents Polish Girlhood (1867-1891) 3 Nation and Family 3 The Floating University 6 The Governess 6 The Periodic Table of Elements 10 Dmitri Ivanovich Mendeleev (1834-1907) 10 Elements and Their Properties 10 Classifying the Elements 12 A Student in Paris (1891-1897) 13 Years of Study 13 Love and Marriage 15 Working Wife and Mother 18 Work and Family 20 Pierre Curie (1859-1906) 21 Radioactivity: The Unstable Nucleus and its Uses 23 Uses of Radioactivity 25 Radium and Radioactivity 26 On a New, Strongly Radio-active Substance
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific References for Nobel Physics Prizes
    1 Scientific References for Nobel Physics Prizes © Dr. John Andraos, 2004 Department of Chemistry, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ONTARIO M3J 1P3, CANADA For suggestions, corrections, additional information, and comments please send e-mails to [email protected] http://www.chem.yorku.ca/NAMED/ 1901 - Wilhelm Conrad Roentgen "in recognition of the extraordinary services he has rendered by the discovery of the remarkable rays subsequently named after him." Roentgen X-ray Roentgen, W.C. Ann. Physik 1898, 64 , 1 Stanton, A. Science 1896, 3 , 227; 726 (translation) 1902 - Hendrik Antoon Lorentz and Pieter Zeeman "in recognition of the extraordinary service they rendered by their researches into the influence of magnetism upon radiation phenomena." Zeeman effect Zeeman, P., Verhandlungen der Physikalischen Gesellschaft zu Berlin 1896, 7 , 128 Zeeman, P., Nature 1897, 55 , 347 (translation by A. Stanton) 1903 - Antoine Henri Becquerel "in recognition of the extraordinary service he has rendered by his discovery of spontaneous radioactivity." Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1896, 122 , 420; 501; 559; 689; 1086 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1896, 123 , 855 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1897, 124 , 444; 800 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1899, 129 , 996; 1205 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1900, 130 , 327; 809; 1583 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1900, 131 , 137 Becquerel, A.H. Compt. Rend. 1901, 133 , 977 1903 - Pierre Curie and Marie Curie, nee Sklodowska "in recognition of the extraordinary services they have rendered by their joint researches on the radiation phenomena discovered by Professor Henri Becquerel." Curie unit of radiation Curie, P; Desains, P., Compt. Rend.
    [Show full text]