DOCSLIB.ORG

A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Report: Option

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Report: Option A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Summary Report – Option Assessment A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Report: Option Assessment Employer: Supplier: Highways England Mouchel Lateral St Johns House 8 City Walk Queen St Leeds Manchester LS11 9AT M2 5JB Document Ref.: HE550313-MOU-GEN-SW-REP-Z-011 Revision: P4.0 Date: September 2016 i A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Summary Report – Option Assessment Document Control Project A66/A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Document Title Stage 0.2 Report – Option Assessment Document Ref HE550313-MOU-GEN-SW-REP-Z-011 Revision P4.0 Name Company Suitability S3 Author(s) H Achampong, J Best, J Walsh Mouchel Date 19/09/2016 Reviewer D Morrow Mouchel Date 22/09/2016 Checker D Morrow Mouchel Date 22/09/2016 Authoriser H Achampong Mouchel Date 23/09/2016 Revision History Revision Date Description Author P1.0 12/02/2016 Draft for review and comment H Achampong, J Best P2.0 29/03/2016 Updated draft for review and H Achampong, J Best comment (Location 5 appraisals) P3.0 12/08/2016 Updated draft for review and H Achampong, J Walsh comment (Updated modelling and scope) P4.0 23/09/2016 Issue for sign off (updated report J Walsh and conclusions following client group review) Reviewer List Name Role Daniel Gaunt Project Sponsor, Highways England Fran Manancourt Strategic Transport Planning Officer, Tees Valley Unlimited Bill Trewick (rev P1.0) Infrastructure Projects Manager, Stockton-On-Tees Council Rob Farnham (rev P2.0, Principal Traffic Engineer, Middlesbrough Council P3.0 & P4.0) Approvals Name Signature Title Issue Date Revision The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England. ii A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Summary Report – Option Assessment Contents Contents .......................................................................................................................... i 0. Executive Summary ............................................................................................. i 0.1. Context and Background .................................................................................................. i 0.2. Summary of Option Assessment ...................................................................................... i 0.3. Options / Option Packages Identified .............................................................................. ii 0.4. Further Assessment ........................................................................................................ iii 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Study Purpose & Objectives............................................................................................ 1 1.3. Study Stages .................................................................................................................. 1 1.4. Stage Objectives ............................................................................................................. 2 2. Summary of Stage 0.1 Findings ......................................................................... 3 2.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 3 2.2. Strategic Context ............................................................................................................ 3 2.3. The Current Situation ...................................................................................................... 3 2.4. Future Considerations ..................................................................................................... 4 2.5. Prioritisation of Challenges ............................................................................................. 4 2.6. Next Steps ...................................................................................................................... 5 3. Assessment Methodology .................................................................................. 6 3.1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 6 3.2. Option Identification ........................................................................................................ 6 3.3. Option Sifting .................................................................................................................. 7 3.4. Option Assessment ....................................................................................................... 15 4. Location 1: A66(M) and A1(M) Junction 57 & Location 2: A66 Darlington Bypass ............................................................................................................... 18 4.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 18 4.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 19 5. Location 3: Potential New Link between A1(M) and A66 ............................... 23 5.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 23 5.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 25 6. Location 4: A66 South-west Stockton-on-Tees to A19 .................................. 29 6.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 29 6.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 30 i A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Summary Report – Option Assessment 7. Location 5: A66 from A19 to Teesport ............................................................ 35 7.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 35 7.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 35 8. Location 6: A689 Tees Valley ........................................................................... 41 8.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 41 8.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 41 9. Location 7: A689 County Durham.................................................................... 43 9.1. Context ......................................................................................................................... 43 9.2. Development of Options ................................................................................................ 43 10. Summary of Results ......................................................................................... 46 10.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 46 10.2. Strategic Fit ................................................................................................................... 46 10.3. Value for Money – Economy ......................................................................................... 46 10.4. Value for Money – Environmental ................................................................................. 46 10.5. Value for Money – Society ............................................................................................ 47 10.6. Value for Money – Public Accounts ............................................................................... 47 10.7. Value for Money – Indicative BCR................................................................................. 48 10.8. Financial Case .............................................................................................................. 48 10.9. Delivery Case ............................................................................................................... 48 10.10. Commercial Case ......................................................................................................... 49 10.11. Summary ...................................................................................................................... 49 11. Conclusions – Identification of Options for Further Assessment ................ 54 11.1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 54 11.2. Recommendations and Next Steps ............................................................................... 54 12. Glossary ............................................................................................................. 57 ii A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.2 Summary Report – Option Assessment Tables Table 3-1: A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Objectives .................................................. 6 Table 3-2: EAST Scoring Categorisation .................................................................................... 9 Table 3-3: Option Assessment Areas ......................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Durham Chester- Le-Street
    Washington Newcastle Consett A6127 A1(M) A182 A183 A693 A693 Bernicia Inset Three Rivers House J63 Shiney Abbeywoods Business Park Row Pity Me A183 Co. Durham DH1 5TG A167 B6313 A167 Tel: 0344 800 3800 Chester- www.bernicia.com le-Street E-mail: [email protected] Potterhouse Sunderland Lane Arnison Centre Consett A693 J63 Sainsbury B1284 Chester- Durham CCC A1052 Abbeywoods le-Street A690 Seaham A1(M) Business Park Sports Car Dealerships Centre A691 A19 North oad ey R Great J62 Sea Abb Northumbrian Water VW Car Lumley t A167 Dealership A68 Durham e e N A690 r t e S Peterlee n t a A167 J61 n L t ro i F P Red A167 A1(M) Hartlepool Lion A688 C A68 Bishop rown Copyright 43428U Auckland East J60 A689 B6312 Rainton Newton West Auckland Aycliffe A1(M) West Billingham A19 River Wear Rainton A688 A68 J59 Consett From A1(M) Southbound Leave the A1(M) at Junction 63 (signed Chester-le-Street & A167). At the roundabout at the bottom of the slip road, join the A167 A691 See Inset towards Durham. Remain on the A167 over 5 roundabouts (passing "The Riverside" A690 cricket ground on the left and the Red Lion public house on the B6532 right) At the sixth roundabout, take the second exit onto Front Street. At the next roundabout turn left onto Abbey Road and at the next A691 roundabout turn left. J62 Turn left onto Abbeywoods. Our building is located on the left hand side. 0 1mile From A1(M) Northbound 0 1 2km Leave the A1(M) at Junction 62 (signed Durham, A690 & Consett).
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Outline Business Case
    Tees Valley Combined Authority Darlington Station Outline Business Case 24 January 2020 Version 1.0 Issue 2 Tees Valley Combined Authority 2085-29 ▪ Darlington Station ▪ Outline Business Case 24 January 2020 ▪ Version 1.0 ▪ Issue Document Control Client: Tees Valley Combined Authority Project Title: Darlington Station Job Number: 2085-29 Report Title: Outline Business Case Date Version Status Author Checked Approved 17/01/2020 0.1 Draft E Roberts J Spruce J Spruce 20/01/2020 0.2 Draft E Roberts J Spruce J Spruce 24/01/2020 1.0 Issue E Roberts J Spruce J Spruce i Tees Valley Combined Authority 2085-29 ▪ Darlington Station ▪ Outline Business Case 24 January 2020 ▪ Version 1.0 ▪ Issue Contents Executive Summary 1 1 Introduction 3 Overview 3 Business Case 3 Document Content and Structure 4 2 The Strategic Case 5 Step 1: Setting the Context 7 2.1.1 Tees Valley Area Profile 7 2.1.2 Darlington Area Profile 15 Step 2: Identifying Transport Barriers 16 2.2.1 Tees Valley Transport Issues 16 2.2.2 Rail Network Issues 21 2.2.3 Darlington Transport Issues 28 Step 3: Exploring Options and Strategic Alternatives 30 2.3.1 Objectives 30 2.3.2 Options 31 Step 4: Exploring Impacts of Interventions 34 2.4.1 Preferred Option 34 2.4.2 Measures for Success 35 Step 5: Aligning with Wider Local Plans and Objectives 36 2.5.1 Tees Valley Local Plans 36 2.5.2 Darlington Local Plan 2016-2036 37 2.5.3 Darlington Economic Strategy 38 2.5.4 Local Large Scale Developments 38 2.5.5 Other Rail Network Proposals 39 Step 6: Considering Wider Evidence and Stakeholder Views
    [Show full text]
  • Elr Data File - Ecm5 York Station - Newcastle West Jn
    ELR DATA FILE - ECM5 YORK STATION - NEWCASTLE WEST JN www.railwaydata.co.uk M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 0m 00ch Bridge Station Footbridge - York Footbridge | Steel 1 0m 00ch Station York YRK 0m 02ch Bridge Ecm5/1 York Sta. North/post Off. Subway Underline Bridge | Steel (Joist in Concrete) 1 0m 09ch Bridge Marble Arch (yms) Underline Bridge | Steel 2 0m 10ch Bridge Ecm5/2a (post Office Subway) Underline Bridge | Cast Iron 2A 0m 54ch Bridge Leeman Road Underline Bridge | Steel 3 0m 68ch Bridge Holgate Beck (part Op) See Notepad Underline Bridge | Brick 3A 1m 04ch Bridge Ecm5/4 (also Hos/3) Landing Lane La Overline Bridge | Concrete 4 1m 05ch Bridge Ecm5/4a (also Hos/3aa) Pipe Bridge L Overline Bridge | Concrete 4A 1m 33ch Bridge Ecm5/5 (hos 4) Underline Bridge | Brick 5 2m 30ch Bridge Millfield Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 10 2m 41ch Bridge Ecm5/10a A1237 York Nth Ring Road L Overline Bridge | Concrete 10A 2m 57ch Bridge Ecm5/11 (near Nether Poppleton) Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 11 3m 12ch Bridge Skelton Bridge Underline Bridge | Stone (Arch) 12 3m 12ch Bridge New Skelton Bridge Viaduct | Wrought Iron 12A 3m 24ch Bridge Ecm5/13 Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 13 3m 44ch Bridge Folly Bridge Underline Bridge | Cast in-situ reinforced Concrete 14 0m 0ch LEVEL 0m 13ch -571 1m 8ch +1310 3m 10ch +5860 1 (ECM5 -00.01 - 004.01) M. Ch. Type Name Details ID 4m 54ch Bridge Ecm5/15 Overton Road Overline Bridge | Steel 15 5m 39ch Bridge Shipton Bridge Overline Bridge | Steel 16 5m 51ch Crossing Newton Sidings Public Footpath Crossing - 6m 37ch Bridge Chapman Bridge Overline Bridge | Steel 17 7m 01ch Crossing Beningbrough Public Footpath Crossing with Minature Stop Lights - 4m 6ch +2478 6m 0ch +5213 2 (ECM5 004.01 - 008.01) M.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL 139 London Roads Carrying Over 10000 Vpd Ranked by Volume of Traffic and Searchable
    CLEAN AIR IN LONDON Roads carrying over 10,000 vehicles per day Received from Transport for London on 060411 DfT Annual Road Traffic Census Counts Major road links within Greater London with an Annual average daily flow estimate of Greater than 10,000 vehicles 2009 Annual Average Daily Traffic Flows Estimates by link Number of All Motor Vehicles -------------Annual Average Daily Flow Estimates--------------- Easting Northing of count of count Road Road Name From…. ….to site site All Motor Vehicles 1 M25 N/A 14 LA Boundary 504031 176656 213,127 2 M4 N/A LA Boundary 4 506000 178400 170,726 3 A13 Newham Way A117 A13 543000 182214 148,977 4 A13 Newham Way A112 A117 542000 182120 140,175 5 A40 Western Avenue A312 A4127 514000 183445 136,071 6 A406 North Circular Road LA Boundary A124 543450 185670 135,043 7 A406 N/A A118 LA Boundary 543400 186000 135,043 8 M25 N/A LA Boundary 25 536250 200000 134,423 9 A4 Great West Road LA Boundary A4 522005 178312 133,364 Southend Road (North 10 A406 Southend Road LA Boundary Cicular Road) 540000 190450 130,196 Southend Road (North 11 A406 Circular Road) A104 LA Boundary 539445 190430 130,196 12 M4 N/A LA Boundary A312 510401 178265 125,029 13 M4 N/A 4 3 508900 178400 125,029 14 A1261 Aspen Way A1206 Aspen Way Tunnel 538620 180750 123,339 15 M25 N/A LA Boundary 29 558360 185100 122,011 16 M25 N/A 28 LA Boundary 555000 194030 117,523 17 A40 Western Avenue A4127 A406(T) 515000 183145 117,405 18 A13 Newham Way A1011 A112 540000 181700 114,549 19 M25 N/A 29 LA Boundary 557400 190260 114,392 20 M25 N/A LA Boundary
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Mitigation Plan for M3 J2-J4a, M1 J28-J32, M1 J32-J32a
    A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.1 Summary Report Employer: Supplier: Highways England Mouchel Lateral St Johns House 8 City Walk Queen St Leeds Manchester LS11 9AT M2 5JB Document Ref.: HE550313-MOU-GEN-SW-REP-Z-001 Date: July 2015 Revision: P1.1 Registered office Bridge House, 1 Walnut Tree Close, Guildford GU1 4LZ Highways England Company Limited registered in England and Wales number 09346363 A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.1 Summary Report Document Control Project A66/A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Document Title Stage 0.1 Summary Report - A66/A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Document Ref HE550313-MOU-GEN-SW-REP-Z-001 Revision P1.1 Name Company Suitability S2 Gerard Jennings / Joanne Author(s) Mouchel Date 29/07/15 Best Henrietta Achampong / Reviewer Mouchel Date 29/07/15 Dave Morrow Checker Rehan Mian / Greg Taylor Mouchel Date 30/07/15 Authoriser Claire Johnson Mouchel Date 30/07/15 Revision History Revision Date Description Author P1.0 30/07/2015 Draft for comment Gerard Jennings / Joanne Best P1.1 16/11/2015 Issue for sign off (Amended Gerard Jennings / Henrietta following client comment) Achampong Reviewer List Name Role Daniel Gaunt Project Sponsor, Highways England Fran Manancourt Strategic Transport Planning Officer, Tees Valley Unlimited Bill Trewick Infrastructure Projects Manager, Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council Approvals Name Signature Title Date of Revision Issue The original format of this document is copyright to Highways England. July 2015 A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.1 Summary Report July 2015 A66 & A689 Tees Valley Strategic Study Stage 0.1 Summary Report Contents 1 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chester-Le-Street District Local Plan to 2006
    CHESTER-LE-STREET DISTRICT LOCAL PLAN TO 2006 Planning Division Civic Centre Newcastle Road Chester-le-Street County Durham DH3 3UT Tel: 0191 387 1919 Fax: 0191 387 1583 ADOPTED PLAN OCTOBER 2003 CONTENTS Introduction & Strategy 1 CHAPTER ONE Natural environment 13 Policies 16 CHAPTER TWO Built Environment 37 Policies 40 CHAPTER THREE Housing and Population 52 Policies 54 CHAPTER FOUR Retailing 74 Policies 76 CHAPTER FIVE Chester-le-Street Town Centre 95 Policies 99 CHAPTER SIX Industry 104 Policies 106 CHAPTER SEVEN Recreation and Leisure 117 Policies 119 CHAPTER EIGHT Tourism 129 Policies 132 CHAPTER NINE Agriculture 141 Policies 142 CHAPTER TEN Transport 153 Policies 155 CHAPTER ELEVEN Public Utilities 164 Policies 165 CHAPTER TWELVE Environmental Appraisal 172 APPENDICES Appendix I – Residential Estate Design 179 Appendix II – Shop Front Design Guidelines and Retail Frontages 195 Appendix III – Policies Specifically Relating to Chester-le-Street Town Centre 199 Appendix IV – Prestige Industrial Estates 201 Appendix V – Formal Play Space Provision 203 Appendix VI – Aims of the Great North Forest 208 Appendix VII – Caravan and Chalet Development 210 Appendix VIII – Siting and Design of Agricultural Buildings 213 Appendix IX – The Conversion of Rural Buildings 217 Appendix X – Parking Guidelines 222 Appendix XI – Environmental Stock Criteria 229 Appendix XII – Index of Policies 237 GLOSSARY 248 Introduction and Strategy 1 INTRODUCTION AND STRATEGY ROLE AND PURPOSE OF THE LOCAL PLAN 1 The Chester-le-Street District Local Plan is a statutory document which provides a land use framework in which the District’s future needs for growth, protection and restraint are balanced. It forms the basis for making day to day planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Darlington
    BOROUGH OF DARLINGTON PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Committee Date – 30 June 2004 SCHEDULE OF APPLICATIONS FOR CONSIDERATION Background Papers used in compiling this Schedule:- 1) Letters and memoranda in reply to consultations. 2) Letters of objection and representation from the public. Index of applications contained in this Schedule are as follows:- Page Address/Site Location Reference Number Policies Faverdale East Business Park 03/00340/RM1 E2, E7, E11, E13, E14, E16, E23, E24, E28, E29, E34, E45, E48, EP1, EP3, EP6, EP7,T2, T7, T12, T13, T36, T37, T40, R2, H15 Queen Street Shopping Arcade 04/00388/OUT E2, E10, E12, E14, E16, E27, E28, E29, E33, E35, E46, E47, E48, EP11.5, S1, S2, T12, T13, T19, T24, T37, T38 Eastbourne Service Station, Yarm Road 04/00231/FUL E16,E29, E46, E47, T2, T13, T24, T31, S10, S11, S18 Topoli Joe’s, 172-176 Northgate 04/00137/CU R25, S9, E35, T24 206 North Road 04/00578/FUL E29, E38, H15 5A The Spinney, Middleton St George 04/00481/OUT E2,E16, H3, H7, H11, T24 37 Middleham Road 04/00453/FUL H12 8 Heathrow Close, Middleton St George 04/00480/FUL H12 25 Church Lane, Middleton St George 04/00420/FUL H12, E35 Eastbourne Nursery School 04/00496/DC H15, EP13, T14 Dodmire School 04/00206/DC E46, H15, R1, R2, R11, R20 DARLINGTON BOROUGH COUNCIL PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE COMMITTEE DATE: 30 June 2004 Page APPLICATION REF. NO: 03/00340/RM1 STATUTORY DECISION DATE: 17 June 2004 WARD/PARISH: FAVERDALE LOCATION: Faverdale East Business Park, Faverdale, Darlington, DESCRIPTION: Details of siting design & external appearance means of access & landscaping of new distribution centre associated offices & maintenance facilities pursuant to Outline Application 03/340/OUTE (19/11/03) amended by plans rec'd 11 & 18/05/04 APPLICANT: ARGOS LIMITED APPLICATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION Faverdale East Business Park is a 35.5 hectare site located to the north west of the town, to the east of High Faverdale Farm and to the north of the Faverdale Industrial Estate.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of DURHAM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE 18Th
    CITY OF DURHAM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE 18th September 2008 REPORT OF DIRECTOR OF STRATEGIC SERVICES 1. REPORT FOR INFORMATION Section 106 Agreements Members are asked to note that a report in relation to monies received from developers as part of planning conditions is attached. CITY OF DURHAM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE 18 September 2008 REPORT OF THE HEAD OF PLANNING SERVICES Reports for Information Members are asked to note that reports in relation to the following items are placed in the Members Room in the Town Hall: - 1. Notice of Planning / Enforcement Appeals which have been lodged with the City Council a) Appeal by Mr D Brown, Mr D Hird and Mr R Young Site at 2, 3 and 4 Auton Close, Bearpark, Durham, DH7 7BJ b) Appeal by Mr C Moulden Site at land at Cheveley Park Shopping Centre, Belmont, Durham, DH1 2AA c) Appeal by Mr G Maw Site at Coalford Lane Farm, Littletown, Durham, DH6 1RD 2. Planning Applications – Determined under Plenary Powers 3. Building Control Applications – Determined under Plenary Powers 4. Decisions made by the County Council Applicant No: CM4/08/361 Applicant: Greencycle Plc Location: Unit S1A, Tursdale Business Park, Tursdale, Durham, DH6 5PG Proposal: Retrospective application for the change of use to recycling recovery facility The above application was considered by the City Council under delegated powers on 9 June 2008 when it was resolved to raise no objection. Durham County Planning Committee has now considered the proposal and resolved to approve the application subject to conditions. Recommendation: That the report be noted. Applicant No: CM4/08/4673 Applicant: Northumbrian Water Ltd Location: Kelloe Sewage Treatment Works, Kelloe, Durham Proposal: Erection of kiosk to house control equipment The above application was considered by the City Council under delegated powers on 1 August 2008 when it was resolved to raise no objection.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTORWAY MAP of ENGLAND, SCOTLAND and WALES
    MOTORWAY MAP of ENGLAND, SCOTLAND and WALES Perth West Perth East Perth South Bridge of Earn Inspired by Dunblane Burnside Stirling North HARRY BECK’S Milnathort M9 Stirling South LONDON UNDERGROUND MAP Kinross M90 Ballingry M9 Kelty © Copyright 2005, 2007, 2008 G Higgins Kincardine Bridge Dunfermline North www.motorwaymap.co.uk M80 Dunfermline M876 South Cowdenbeath Printed by The Map Centre, Hereford www.themapcentre.com V3 Falkirk Stenhousemuir Grangemouth Inverkeithing Bonnybridge M80 Cumbernauld Polmont M9 North Linlithgow Kirkliston Stepps Philpstoun M80 Erskine Braehead Robroyston Bridge M898 M73 Cumbernauld South Paisley Kinning Gallow- Gartham- M9 Newbridge West Paisley Hillington Ibrox Park Anderston Cowcaddens gate Riddrie lock Gartcosh Newhouse Whitburn Livingston M8 M8 M8 M8 M8 M8 Langbank Linwood Glasgow Renfrew Govan Laurieston Charing Garnet- Springburn Ruchazie Easter- Baillieston Shotts Bathgate Edinburgh Airport Cross hill Rd Dennistoun house Dumbreck M73 Pollok Rutherglen Broomhouse GLASGOW Great North Rd Thornliebank M74 Jesmond Rd Cambuslang Bellshill Crookfur A167(M) Camden St NEWCASTLE M77 Hamilton upon TYNE Newton Mearns Manors Kingswell Larkhall North Tyne Bridge Fenwick Larkhall South Kirkmuirhill Kilmarnock Monkton M74 Lesmahagow A194(M) Pelaw Coalburn Washington North Uddington Birtley Abington Washington South Crawford Moffat A195(M) Chester-le-Street Johnstonebridge Bowburn Lockerbie North A1(M) Sedgefield A74(M) Lockerbie South Newton Aycliffe Ecclefechan Darlington North Annan Darlington South Kirkpatrick
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Council Name - England Council logo can be inserted here 2009 Air Quality Updating and Screening Assessment for Gateshead Council In fulfillment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management Date April, 2009 Updating and Screening Assessment Date (Month Year) Council Name - England Local Authority Mrs Janice Lawton Officer Department Development & Enterprise Regulatory Services – Environmental Health Address Civic Centre, Regent Street, Gateshead, Tyne & Wear NE8 1HH Telephone 0191 4333916 e-mail [email protected] Report Reference Gateshead USA 09 number Date April 2009 ii Updating and Screening Assessment Date (Month Year) Council Name - England Executive Summary Gateshead Council’s Updating and Screening Assessment 2009 has found that there are no new developments or changes in existing pollutant sources which may have a significant impact on pollutant concentrations in Gateshead. All of the air quality objectives in the Governments National Air Quality Strategy 2007 are met for all of the relevant pollutants, namely benzene, 1-3 butadiene, carbon monoxide, lead, nitrogen dioxide, PM10, and sulphur dioxide, except for a few marginal exceedences, or borderline cases, of the annual mean objective for nitrogen dioxide. These isolated cases are all within the existing Town Centre Air Quality Management Area and a Further Detailed Assessment of Nitrogen Dioxide for this and the Portobello AQMA has recently been submitted to Defra for appraisal. The Council does not therefore intend to carry out detailed assessments for any of the relevant pollutants. Although there were no exceedences of the nitrogen dioxide objectives within the Portobello AQMA for 2008, the Council does not consider it appropriate to revoke the AQMA based on only one year’s data.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements
    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Neighbourhood Plan has been produced by volunteers from the Neighbourhood Plan Working Group with the support and endorsement of the Durham City Neighbourhood Planning Forum. The volunteers at various times have comprised: John Ashby Pippa Bell Ruth Chambers Sue Childs Roger Cornwell Mike Costello Adam Deathe Karen Elliott Jonathan Elmer Ann Evans David Hook Peter Jackson Jonathan Lovell John Lowe Nigel Martin Matthew Phillips David Miller Muriel Sawbridge Kirsty Thomas Angela Tracy Ros Ward DURHAM CITY NEIGHBOURHOOD DRAFT PLAN FOR PUBLIC CONSULTATION November 2017 Durham City Neighbourhood Planning Forum © Durham City Neighbourhood Planning Forum, 2017 DURHAM CITY NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING FORUM The Durham City Neighbourhood Planning Forum is an officially-sanctioned group of volunteers who live or work in Durham City. Our role is to produce a Neighbourhood Plan for Durham City, based on the views of the community. The Forum comprises 32 members. The Forum officers are: · Chair: Roger Cornwell · Vice Chair: John Ashby · Secretary: John Lowe · Treasurer: Sue Childs · Engagement Officer: Pippa Bell Project Manager: Ros Ward PLAN CONSULTATION The consultation runs from 4th November to 18th December Drop In Events St John's Church, Neville's Cross Monday 6 November, 14.30 to 18.30 St Oswald's Institute, Church St, Tuesday 21 November, 11.00 to 16.00 St Nicholas Church, Market Place Friday 24 November. 12.00 to 16.00 Heritage Centre, Wharton Park Wednesday 6 December, 11.00 to 16.00 Document Viewing
    [Show full text]