DOCSLIB.ORG

Myanmar: Internal Displacement in Kachin and Northern Shan States (1 Aug 2014)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Myanmar: Internal Displacement in Kachin and Northern Shan States (1 Aug 2014) Myanmar: Internal Displacement in Kachin and northern Shan States (1 Aug 2014) IDP camp State Capital IDPs per Township INDIA 17 - 5,000 Nawngmun 5,001 - 15,000 15,001 - 30,076 International Boundary State Boundary Township Boundary Puta-O Machanbaw Khaunglanhpu BHUTAN INDIA CHINA Tanai Tsawlaw BANGLADESH Sumprabum Lahe KACHIN Injangyang LAOS Chipwi Bay of Bengal Hpakan Myitkyina THAILAND Waingmaw Mogaung Gulf of Homalin Thailand Mohnyin CHINA Andaman Sea Reported No State/Region Township Date & Source IDPs 1 Kachin Bhamo 8,439 2 Kachin Chipwi 3,797 3 Kachin Hpakan 3,570 4 Kachin Khaunglanhpu 17 5 Kachin Mansi 12,794 Shwegu 6 Kachin Mogaung 148 7 Kachin Mohnyin 150 Momauk 8 Kachin Momauk 23,512 9 Kachin Myitkyina 6,604 1 0 Kachin Puta-O 211 Aug 2014 Bhamo 1 1 Kachin Shwegu 2,423 (CCCM Cluster) 1 2 Kachin Waingmaw 30,076 Pinlebu 1 3 Kachin Sumprabum 32 Mansi 1 4 Kachin Machanbaw 37 1 5 Shan (North) Kutkai 2,747 1 6 Shan (North) Manton 290 Muse 1 7 Shan (North) Muse 1,267 1 8 Shan (North) Namhkan 1,844 1 9 Shan (North) Namtu 571 Kawlin Namhkan 2 0 Shan (North) Hseni 392 Kachin & Shan (North) Total 98,921 Map Doc Name: Kutkai MMR_0307_IDPs_Kachin_140801_A3_Portrait Manton Map reference Number: MMR_0307 Creation Date: 17 Sept 2014 Projection/Datum: D_WGS_1984 Hseni Nominal Scale at A3 paper size: 1:1,820,681 Kachin IDPs trend (July 2013 - Aug 2014) 100,000 0 30 60 Kilometers 4 6 9 8 8 6 4 4 7 4 0 5 5 8 80,000 2 2 7 8 2 1 1 1 2 , , 4 4 4 4 4 , , , 0 , 6 6 6 7 , , 8 8 9 9 9 2 0 0 0 0 3 9 9 4 4 , , , , 4 4 4 5 0 4 4 0 20 40 Miles 3 2 2 2 60,000 , 5 5 5 5 3 Namtu 5 Pangwaun 40,000 1 5 4 1 1 4 4 2 7 7 3 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 0 0 5 2 0 4 SHAN NORTH 7 7 7 9 5 7 7 4 4 1 , , , Map data source(s): , , , , , 6 6 6 3 2 0 0 8 , , , , , 6 6 6 6 20,000 6 5 5 4 8 8 8 Admin,Settlement data: GAD/MIMU 8 8 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 Source of data: OCHA, Camp Coordination and Camp 0 Management (CCCM) Cluster. Disclaimers: The boundaries and names shown and the designations Areas where Government's services are not available used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. Areas where Government's services are available Wetlet Nawnghkio Ayadaw Madaya.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Appendix – D Model Villages with Rice Husk Gas Engine
    APPENDIX – D MODEL VILLAGES WITH RICE HUSK GAS ENGINE APPENDIX D-1 Project Examples 1 (1/3) Development Plan Appendix D-1 Project Examples 1: Rice Husk Gas Engine Electrification in Younetalin Village Plans were prepared to electrify villages with rice husk gas engine in Ayeyarwaddi Division headed by Area Commander. Younetalin Village was the first to be electrified in accordance with the plans. The scheme at Younetalin village was completed quite quickly. It was conceived in January 2001 and the committee was formed then. The scheme commenced operation on 15 2001 April and therefore took barely 3 months to arrange the funding and building. The project feature is as follows (as of Nov 2002): Nippon Koei / IEEJ The Study on Introduction of Renewable Energies Volume 5 in Rural Areas in Myanmar Development Plans APPENDIX D-1 Project Examples 1 (2/3) Basic Village Feature Household 1,100 households Industry and product 6 rice mills, BCS, Video/Karaoke Shops Paddy (Cultivation field is 250 ares), fruits processing, rice noodle processing) Public facilities Primary school, monastery, state high school, etc. Project Cost and Fund Capital cost K9,600,000 (K580,000 for engine and generator, K3,800,000 for distribution lines) Collection of fund From K20,000 up to K40,000 was collected according to the financial condition of each house. Difference between the amount raised by the villagers and the capital cost of was K4,000,000. It was covered by loan from the Area Commander of the Division with 2 % interest per month. Unit and Fuel Spec of unit Engine :140 hp, Hino 12 cylinder diesel engine Generator : 135 kVA Model : RH-14 Rice husk ¾ 12 baskets per hour is consumed consumption ¾ 6 rice mills powered by diesel generator.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2020 (23:45 Yangon Time)
    Allocation Strategy Paper 2020: FIRST STANDARD ALLOCATION DEADLINE: Monday, 20 July 2020 (23:45 Yangon time) I. ALLOCATION OVERVIEW I.1. Introduction This document lays the strategy to allocating funds from the Myanmar Humanitarian Fund (MHF) First Standard Allocation to scale up the response to the protracted humanitarian crises in Myanmar, in line with the 2020 Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP). The allocation responds also to the critical underfunded situation of humanitarian requirements by mid-June 2020. As of 20 June, only 23 per cent of the 2020 HRP requirements, including the revised COVID-19 Addendum, have been met up to now (29 per cent in the case of the mentioned addendum), which is very low in comparison with donor contributions against the HRP in previous years for the same period (50 per cent in 2019 and 40 per cent in 2018). This standard allocation will make available about US$7 million to support coordinated humanitarian assistance and protection, covering displaced people and other vulnerable crisis-affected people in Chin, Rakhine, Kachin and Shan states. The allocation will not include stand-alone interventions related to the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has been already supported through a Reserve Allocation launched in April 2020, resulting in ten funded projects amounting a total of $3.8 million that are already being implemented. Nevertheless, COVID-19 related actions may be mainstreamed throughout the response to the humanitarian needs. In addition, activities in Kayin State will not be included in this allocation, due to the ongoing projects and level of funding as per HRP requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • The Union Report the Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Census Report Volume 2
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report The Union Report : Census Report Volume 2 Volume Report : Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population May 2015 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census The Union Report Census Report Volume 2 For more information contact: Department of Population Ministry of Immigration and Population Office No. 48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431 062 www.dop.gov.mm May, 2015 Figure 1: Map of Myanmar by State, Region and District Census Report Volume 2 (Union) i Foreword The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census (2014 MPHC) was conducted from 29th March to 10th April 2014 on a de facto basis. The successful planning and implementation of the census activities, followed by the timely release of the provisional results in August 2014 and now the main results in May 2015, is a clear testimony of the Government’s resolve to publish all information collected from respondents in accordance with the Population and Housing Census Law No. 19 of 2013. It is my hope that the main census results will be interpreted correctly and will effectively inform the planning and decision-making processes in our quest for national development. The census structures put in place, including the Central Census Commission, Census Committees and Offices at all administrative levels and the International Technical Advisory Board (ITAB), a group of 15 experts from different countries and institutions involved in censuses and statistics internationally, provided the requisite administrative and technical inputs for the implementation of the census.
    [Show full text]
  • Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Call for Proposals (Cfp)
    Livelihoods and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT) Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Call for Proposals (CfP) Ref no: CfP/LIFT/2016/7/Migration Release date: 19 February 2016 Deadline: 21 March 2016 12:00hrs (noon) Title: Leveraging Labour Migration for Development Duration: Planned start date July 2016, not to go beyond March 2019 Background UNOPS is the Fund Manager for the multi-donor Livelihood and Food Security Trust Fund (LIFT), which was established in 2009 to address food insecurity and income poverty in Myanmar. LIFT’s donors are Australia, Denmark, the European Union, France, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America. From the private sector, the Mitsubishi Corporation is a donor. The overall goal of LIFT is to sustainably reduce the number of people living in poverty and hunger in Myanmar. LIFT’s purpose is to improve the incomes and nutrition status of poor rural people by promoting resilient livelihoods and food security. Its designated outcomes are improvements in income, resilience, nutrition, and pro-poor policy developments. LIFT works with implementing partners (IPs), such as international NGOs, national NGOs, United Nations agencies, international organisations, academic and research institutions and the Government of Myanmar. LIFT is currently funding projects at the Union level and in the Ayeyarwady Delta, the Dry Zone, Myanmar’s Uplands and Rakhine State. So far, LIFT has reached over three million people, or roughly six per cent of Myanmar's population, and is active in just under half of the country's townships. The Fund is expected to continue operations until the end of 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2008
    cover_asia_report_2008_2:cover_asia_report_2007_2.qxd 28/11/2008 17:18 Page 1 Central Committee for Drug Lao National Commission for Drug Office of the Narcotics Abuse Control Control and Supervision Control Board Vienna International Centre, P.O. Box 500, A-1400 Vienna, Austria Tel: (+43 1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43 1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Opium Poppy Cultivation in South East Asia Lao PDR, Myanmar, Thailand OPIUM POPPY CULTIVATION IN SOUTH EAST ASIA IN SOUTH EAST CULTIVATION OPIUM POPPY December 2008 Printed in Slovakia UNODC's Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme (ICMP) promotes the development and maintenance of a global network of illicit crop monitoring systems in the context of the illicit crop elimination objective set by the United Nations General Assembly Special Session on Drugs. ICMP provides overall coordination as well as direct technical support and supervision to UNODC supported illicit crop surveys at the country level. The implementation of UNODC's Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme in South East Asia was made possible thanks to financial contributions from the Government of Japan and from the United States. UNODC Illicit Crop Monitoring Programme – Survey Reports and other ICMP publications can be downloaded from: http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/crop-monitoring/index.html The boundaries, names and designations used in all maps in this document do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations. This document has not been formally edited. CONTENTS PART 1 REGIONAL OVERVIEW ..............................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State
    A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State ASIA PAPER May 2018 EUROPEAN UNION A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State © Institute for Security and Development Policy V. Finnbodavägen 2, Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden www.isdp.eu “A Return to War: Militarized Conflicts in Northern Shan State” is an Asia Paper published by the published by the Institute for Security and Development Policy. The Asia Paper Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Institute’s Asia Program, and addresses topical and timely subjects. The Institute is based in Stockholm, Sweden, and cooperates closely with research centers worldwide. The Institute serves a large and diverse community of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. It is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lectures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public discussion. This publication has been produced with funding by the European Union. The content of this publication does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed in the paper lies entirely with the authors. No third-party textual or artistic material is included in the publication without the copyright holder’s prior consent to further dissemination by other third parties. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. © European Union and ISDP, 2018 Printed in Lithuania ISBN: 978-91-88551-11-5 Cover photo: Patrick Brown patrickbrownphoto.com Distributed in Europe by: Institute for Security and Development Policy Västra Finnbodavägen 2, 131 30 Stockholm-Nacka, Sweden Tel.
    [Show full text]
  • Grave Diggers a Report on Mining in Burma
    GRAVE DIGGERS A REPORT ON MINING IN BURMA BY ROGER MOODY CONTENTS Abbreviations........................................................................................... 2 Map of Southeast Asia............................................................................. 3 Acknowledgments ................................................................................... 4 Author’s foreword ................................................................................... 5 Chapter One: Burma’s Mining at the Crossroads ................................... 7 Chapter Two: Summary Evaluation of Mining Companies in Burma .... 23 Chapter Three: Index of Mining Corporations ....................................... 29 Chapter Four: The Man with the Golden Arm ....................................... 43 Appendix I: The Problems with Copper.................................................. 53 Appendix II: Stripping Rubyland ............................................................. 59 Appendix III: HIV/AIDS, Heroin and Mining in Burma ........................... 61 Appendix IV: Interview with a former mining engineer ........................ 63 Appendix V: Observations from discussions with Burmese miners ....... 67 Endnotes .................................................................................................. 68 Cover: Workers at Hpakant Gem Mine, Kachin State (Photo: Burma Centrum Nederland) A Report on Mining in Burma — 1 Abbreviations ASE – Alberta Stock Exchange DGSE - Department of Geological Survey and Mineral Exploration (Burma)
    [Show full text]
  • Kachin State for the May 2021 3W July 2021
    Myanmar Information Management Unit Overview of Kachin State for the May 2021 3W July 2021 The MIMU 3W gathers inputs from participating humanitarian and development agencies on Who is doing What, Where, across Myanmar. It is normally conducted every 6 months and provides information on agencies’ activities at various levels (village/village tract/township, and IDP camps). Given the changing situation, there has been a 9 month gap since the last 3W round documenting agencies activities as of August 28th 2020. In total, 159 agencies participated in the May 2021 3W, providing information on their humanitarian and development activities across 22 sectors and 157 sub-sectors as defined by technical/sector working groups. 3W reporting is quite comprehensive for projects of INGO, UN and Red Cross agencies, but there is under-reporting of activities for local NGOs and CBOs, since not all are participating. This indicates 54 less agencies reporting than in the last MIMU 3W in August 2020, possibly due to the pressures of the COVID pandemic and/or uncertainty re the situation for agencies’ activities countrywide. Note that Agencies must report to a sufficiently detailed level (village or camp level) for their work to be reflected fully in the MIMU 3W products. This Overview describes projects under implementation in Kachin as of May 31, 2021. Further information on planned and recently completed projects is available from the 3W dataset, which can be requested by 3W Partners. Projects under implementation can also be viewed on our interactive
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Inclusion
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 I LIFT Annual Report 2020 ANNUAL REPORT 2020 II III LIFT Annual Report 2020 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asian Development Bank LBVD Livestock Breeding and Veterinary ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Department CBO Community-based Organisation We thank the governments of Australia, Canada, the European Union, LEARN Leveraging Essential Nutrition Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and CSO Civil Society Organisation Actions To Reduce Malnutrition project the United States of America for their kind contributions to improving the livelihoods and food security of rural poor people in Myanmar. Their DAR Department of Agricultural MAM Moderate acute malnutrition support to the Livelihoods and Food Security Fund (LIFT) is gratefully Research acknowledged. M&E Monitoring and evaluation DC Donor Consortium MADB Myanmar Agriculture Department of Agriculture Development Bank DISCLAIMER DoA DoF Department of Fisheries MEAL Monitoring, evaluation, This document is based on information from projects funded by LIFT in accountability and learning 2020 and supported with financial assistance from Australia, Canada, the DRD Department for Rural European Union, Ireland, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland, the United Development MoALI Ministry of Agriculture, Kingdom, and the United States of America. The views expressed herein Livestock and Irrigation should not be taken to reflect the official opinion of the LIFT donors. DSW Department of Social Welfare MoE Ministry of Education Exchange rate: This report converts MMK into
    [Show full text]
  • First Standard Allocation (2021) Strategy Paper
    First Standard Allocation (2021) Strategy Paper DEADLINE: Tuesday, 1 June 2021 (09:00am Yangon time) Allocation Summary This document lays the strategy to allocating funds from the Myanmar Humanitarian Fund (MHF) First Standard Allocation in response to the protracted humanitarian crises in Myanmar, in line with the Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) 2021. The allocation will address the underfunded situation of humanitarian requirements. By 20 April 2021, only 12.5 per cent of the HRP 2021 requirements had been met1. Looking at the most underfunded sectors as per HRP requirements, Education in emergencies (EiE) has not been funded yet, followed by water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) with 1.3 per cent of requirements met; and shelter, non-food items and camp coordination and camp management (Shelter/NFI/CCCM) with 1.7 per cent reached. This standard allocation will make US$10 million available to support coordinated humanitarian assistance and protection, covering displaced people and other vulnerable crisis-affected people in Chin, Rakhine, Kachin and Shan states and the south-eastern part of Myanmar.2 COVID-19 related actions will be mainstreamed throughout the response to the humanitarian needs. In areas identified by the HRP, additional emergency response for people with humanitarian needs as a consequence of the new context since 1 February 2021 will be considered, as per needs assessment and analysis provided during the prioritization process. Additional emergency response beyond the areas indicated in the HRP 2021, particularly urban and peri-urban areas, as a consequence of the developments since 1 February 2021, will not be included under this allocation.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census SHAN STATE, KYAUKME DISTRICT Namtu Township Report
    THE REPUBLIC OF THE UNION OF MYANMAR The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census SHAN STATE, KYAUKME DISTRICT Namtu Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population October 2017 The 2014 Myanmar Population and Housing Census Shan State, Kyaukme District Namtu Township Report Department of Population Ministry of Labour, Immigration and Population Office No.48 Nay Pyi Taw Tel: +95 67 431062 www.dop.gov.mm October 2017 Figure 1 : Map of Shan State, showing the townships Namtu Township Figures at a Glance 1 Total Population 50,423 2 Population males 24,448 (48.5%) Population females 25,975 (51.5%) Percentage of urban population 26.4% Area (Km2) 1,689.0 3 Population density (per Km2) 29.9 persons Median age 25.8 years Number of wards 2 Number of village tracts 21 Number of private households 11,641 Percentage of female headed households 27.5% Mean household size 4.2 persons 4 Percentage of population by age group Children (0 – 14 years) 32.6% Economically productive (15 – 64 years) 62.3% Elderly population (65+ years) 5.1% Dependency ratios Total dependency ratio 60.5 Child dependency ratio 52.3 Old dependency ratio 8.2 Ageing index 15.6 Sex ratio (males per 100 females) 94 Literacy rate (persons aged 15 and over) 67.5% Male 71.8% Female 63.7% People with disability Number Per cent Any form of disability 3,082 6.1 Walking 1,035 2.1 Seeing 1,374 2.7 Hearing 1,137 2.3 Remembering 976 1.9 Type of Identity Card (persons aged 10 and over) Number Per cent Citizenship Scrutiny 28,204 71.4 Associate Scrutiny
    [Show full text]
  • THE STATE of LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS in KACHIN Photo Credits
    Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN Photo credits Mike Adair Emilie Röell Myanmar Survey Research A photo record of the UNDP Governance Mapping Trip for Kachin State. Travel to Tanai, Putao, Momauk and Myitkyina townships from Jan 6 to Jan 23, 2015 is available here: http://tinyurl.com/Kachin-Trip-2015 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author, and do not necessarily represent the views of UNDP. Local Governance Mapping THE STATE OF LOCAL GOVERNANCE: TRENDS IN KACHIN UNDP MYANMAR Table of Contents Acknowledgements II Acronyms III Executive Summary 1 1. Introduction 5 2. Kachin State 7 2.1 Kachin geography 9 2.2 Population distribution 10 2.3 Socio-economic dimensions 11 2.4 Some historical perspectives 13 2.5 Current security situation 18 2.6 State institutions 18 3. Methodology 24 3.1 Objectives of mapping 25 3.2 Mapping tools 25 3.3 Selected townships in Kachin 26 4. Governance at the front line – Findings on participation, responsiveness and accountability for service provision 27 4.1 Introduction to the townships 28 4.1.1 Overarching development priorities 33 4.1.2 Safety and security perceptions 34 4.1.3 Citizens’ views on overall improvements 36 4.1.4 Service Provider’s and people’s views on improvements and challenges in selected basic services 37 4.1.5 Issues pertaining to access services 54 4.2 Development planning and participation 57 4.2.1 Development committees 58 4.2.2 Planning and use of development funds 61 4.2.3 Challenges to township planning and participatory development 65 4.3 Information, transparency and accountability 67 4.3.1 Information at township level 67 4.3.2 TDSCs and TMACs as accountability mechanisms 69 4.3.3 WA/VTAs and W/VTSDCs 70 4.3.4 Grievances and disputes 75 4.3.5 Citizens’ awareness and freedom to express 78 4.3.6 Role of civil society organisations 81 5.
    [Show full text]